Revision as of 03:28, 22 November 2013 edit108.56.212.44 (talk) →Mary Magdalene← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:45, 17 December 2024 edit undoNeroSpicy (talk | contribs)72 edits the Septuagint | ||
(644 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Traditional understanding and theories on the sexuality of Jesus}} | |||
{{Unbalanced|date=December 2012}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2023}} | |||
{{Jesus}} | {{Jesus}} | ||
The traditional understanding of ] churches and ] is that ] never married and remained ] until his death. However, this has not prevented speculation about alternative and fringe theories of his sexuality, as both the ] and the ] reveal little on the subject. | |||
The '''sexuality of ]''' has been portrayed in fiction, but the ] 4:15 states: 'We do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.' Most ] denominations throughout history thus have maintained that Jesus remained ] until his death. Interpretation of indirect evidence has produced widely varying theories of Jesus's sexuality. | |||
== |
==Cultural background== | ||
In first century ], sexual immorality in ] included incest, impure thoughts, ], ], and ]. According to the rabbinic interpretation of Genesis 2:24,<ref>{{bibleverse|Genesis|2:24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.jtsa.edu/torah/sexual-immorality/ | title=Sexual Immorality - Jewish Theological Seminary }}</ref> "a man shall leave his father and his mother" forbids a man from having relations with his father's wife and his own biological mother; "cleave to his wife" forbids a man from having more than one wife, having relations with another woman; and "they shall become one flesh" forbids a man from having relations with non-human beings (such as animals).<ref name=weiner429>{{cite book |last= Weiner |first= Moshe |year= 2009 |title= Sheva Mitzvot Hashem |volume=2 |pages= 429–30 fn. 5 |trans-title= Seven Laws of God |language= he |location= Pittsburgh |publisher= Ask Noah International |isbn= 978-0-9814811-4-2}}</ref> Jesus states in the gospels that he came "not to ], but to fulfill the ]", and at his various trials, no one could testify that Jesus broke them (],<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|5:17|9}}</ref> ]:59–60).<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|26:59–60|9}}</ref> | |||
In the ] {{bibleverse-nb||Matthew|19:3-12}} Jesus condemns ] (though an exception is given in cases of adultery), quoting ] {{bibleverse-nb||Genesis|1:27}} and {{bibleverse-nb||Genesis|2:24}}, and explains himself with these words: | |||
==Celibacy== | |||
:''] permitted you to divorce your ] because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, and marries another woman commits ].'' | |||
Mainstream Christian thinking typically assumes Jesus to have remained celibate and without a defined sexuality, living a pious life free from sins such as ] or ]. | |||
:''The disciples said to him, "If this is the situation between a husband and wife, it is better not to marry.'' | |||
:''Jesus replied, "Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For some are ]s because they were born that way; others were made that way by men; and others have renounced marriage because of the ]. The one who can accept this should accept it. (NIV)'' | |||
===Eunuchdom=== | |||
⚫ | |||
In the ] 19:3–12, Jesus is reported to have referred to the behavior of ] to illustrate a desirable approach to sexuality: "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake."<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|19:3–12}}</ref> The term "eunuch" normally referred to a ] man. Several ] and Bible commentators have interpreted this passage as indicating Jesus's support for complete ].<ref group="note">In the ancient Middle East and Asia, eunuchs often served as officials overseeing harems, or in other Royal positions. See {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203095904/http://lexicorient.com/e.o/eunuch.htm |date=2020-12-03 }} for more details.</ref> | |||
⚫ | The early Christian writer ] who was purported to have interpreted Jesus' words literally, was alleged to have ] as an act of devotion.<ref>J. David Hester (2005). ''Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19:12 and Transgressive Sexualities''. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 28, No. 1, 13–40 (2005)</ref> The early ] ] wrote that Jesus himself lived as a "eunuch",<ref group=note>There is some controversy in this statement as in context, ''spado'', which in most cases means "eunuch", is generally translated as "virgin" as in ] and a fuller explanation can be found . e.g. Tertullian, On Monogamy, 3: "...He stands before you, if you are willing to copy him, as a voluntary ''spado'' (eunuch) in the flesh." And elsewhere: "The Lord Himself opened the kingdom of heaven to eunuchs and He Himself lived as a eunuch. The apostle also, following His example, made himself a eunuch..."</ref> likewise encouraged people to adopt this practice.<ref>Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem i.29.</ref> | ||
⚫ | ==Mary Magdalene== | ||
{{See also|Mary_Magdalene#Relationship_with_Jesus}} | |||
The ] (not in the ]) states that Jesus kissed ]. Considering the ] nature of writing, most do not consider this a sexual act, instead interpreting it as an instance of a common Middle-Eastern cultural practice, signifying the transfer of knowledge (in this case, ]) between a teacher and his pupils.<ref>Eric Lyons, , at ''Apologetics Press''</ref><ref></ref> However, the notion of a marriage between Jesus and Mary Magdalene has been a frequent topic in literature, and within the 1982 fraud, '']''. | |||
==Corporeal genitalia== | |||
==The beloved disciple== | |||
]''.]] | |||
⚫ | {{Main| |
||
Christ is ascribed a male ] during his time on Earth, including a set of male genitalia. The ] is a major event of the early ], originally described in Luke<ref>]</ref> as taking place shortly after the ] at the temple in accordance with the Jewish law followed by Mary and Joseph. The ], or ], removed from Jesus's body is a major ] and is described by one scholar as representing a focus on the ].<ref name="Dzon">Dzon, Mary. , University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017, p. 221, {{ISBN|9780812248845}}</ref> | |||
The ] makes references to the '']'' (John 13:23, 19:26, 21:7, 20), a phrase which does not occur in the ]. In the text, this ''beloved disciple'' is present at the ], with ]. | |||
Beginning in the 13th century, European art would break with Christian tradition of hiding Jesus's genitalia using clothing and composition, instead depicting Christ with a visible or even physically erect phallus.<ref>Leo Steinberg: '«Adams Verbrechen». In: ], Eleonora Louis (eds.): ''Glaube Hoffnung Liebe Tod''. Klagenfurt, 1996. p. 170.</ref> This "display of the genitals" was coined in art scholarship as the '']'', mirroring the ''ostentatio vulnerum'', or "display of the ]", during the Passion.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dukes |first=Hunter |date=April 14, 2022 |title=*Ostentatio Genitalium* in Renaissance Art |url=https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/ostentatio-genitalium/ |access-date=2022-10-09 |website=The Public Domain Review |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The ''disciple whom Jesus loved'' is a self-reference by the author of the Gospel (John 21:24), traditionally regarded as ]. Rollan McCleary, author of ''Signs for a Messiah'', thinks this identification would make the phrase highly significant.<ref>Crosswalk: '''' by Patrick Goodenough, Pacific Rim Bureau Chief, CNSNews.com.</ref> | |||
==Heterosexuality== | |||
⚫ | ]]] | ||
⚫ | ===Mary Magdalene=== | ||
], in his work ''Spiritual Friendship'', referred to the relationship of Jesus and John as a "marriage" and held it out as an example sanctioning friendships between clerics.<ref>Louis Crompton, ''Homosexuality and Civilization'' p.180</ref> | |||
{{See also|Mary Magdalene#Speculations}} | |||
]]] | |||
The ] 3rd-century ], using ] variants of the Greek {{lang|grc|κοινωνός}} ({{transliteration|grc|koinōnos}}), describes Jesus' relationship with Mary Magdalene. The gospel uses ]s of {{transliteration|grc|koinōnos}} and Coptic equivalents to refer both to the literal pairing of men and women in marriage and sexual intercourse, but also metaphorically, referring to a spiritual partnership, and the reunification of the Gnostic Christian with the divine realm.<ref>{{cite book|last=Marjanen|first=Antti|title=The Woman Jesus Loved: Mary Magdalene in the Nag Hammadi Library and Related Documents|year=1996|publisher=Brill|location=Leiden|isbn=9004106588|pages=151–60 et passim|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TalC9sUIgE0C}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | ] may have been relying on a pre-existing tradition when he defended his relationship with the |
||
The Gospel of Philip mentions Mary Magdalene as one of three women named Mary "who always walked with the Lord" (Philip 59.6–11). The work also says that the Lord loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often (Philip 63.34–36).<ref name="KingFrontline">King, Karen L. "Women in Ancient Christianity: The New Discoveries". ''Frontline'': The First Christians. Web: 2 November 2009.</ref> Author ] argues that it was common in early Christianity to kiss a fellow believer by way of greeting (1 Peter 5:14),<ref>{{Bibleverse|1 Peter|5:14|ESV}}</ref> thus such kissing would have no romantic connotations.<ref name="dickson95">''The Christ Files: How Historians Know What They Know About Jesus'', John Dickson, p. 95 (Sydney South: Blue Bottle Books, 2006). {{ISBN|1-921137-54-1}}</ref> Kripal writes that "the historical sources are simply too contradictory and simultaneously too silent" to make absolute declarations regarding Jesus' sexuality.<ref>Jeffrey John Kripal, ''The Serpent's Gift: Gnostic Reflections on the Study of Religion'', p. 52 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007). {{ISBN|0-226-45380-4}} {{ISBN|0-226-45381-2}}</ref> | |||
Others who have given voice to this interpretation of the relationship between Jesus and John have been the philosophers ] and ].<ref>Louis Crompton, ''Homosexuality and Civilization'', p. 111.</ref> However, many other researchers reject the theory. For example, ] pointed out that the Greek word translated as "loved" is ] (used, for example, in John 3:16; "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, ].<ref>Robert A. J. Gagnon, ''The Bible and homosexual practice'' (2001)</ref> | |||
], a scholar of the Greek New Testament and early Christianity, concludes that historical evidence says nothing at all about Jesus' sexuality—"certainly nothing to indicate that Jesus and Mary had a sexual relationship of any kind". Ehrman says that the question people ask him most often is whether Mary Magdalene and Jesus of Nazareth married each other (after the claim was popularized in '']''): | |||
] supposed that the depicted scene was a ]n custom, similar to present day ].<ref>"How often have I seen men friends in such an attitude. There is not the slightest infringement of the rules of propriety; the act was as natural to us all as shaking hands. The practice is especially indulged in when intimate friends are about to part from one another, as on the eve of a journey, or when about the face a dangerous undertaking. Then they sit with their heads leaning against each other, or the one's head resting upon the other's shoulder or breast.", Abraham Rihbany, ''The Syrian Christ'' (1916)</ref> | |||
{{blockquote|It is not true that the ] contained Gospels that discussed Mary and Jesus. ... Nor is it true that the marriage of Mary and Jesus is repeatedly discussed in the Gospels that didn't make it into the New Testament. In fact, it is never discussed at all—never even mentioned, not even once. ... It is not true that the Gospel of Philip calls Mary Jesus' spouse.<ref>B. D. Ehrman, ''Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend''. New York: Oxford, 2006. p. 248.</ref>}} | |||
⚫ | ] discussed the possible homoerotic inclinations of Jesus in a sermon in 2005. Robinson's claim has been |
||
===Polygamy=== | |||
] the author of "Jesus Acted Up, A Gay and Lesbian Manifesto" and "Queering Christ, Beyond Jesus Acted Up,"<ref>http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2002/12/05/Culture/Goss-Challenges.Traditional.Christian.Beliefs-336580.shtml</ref> said of the interaction between Jesus and John, it "is a ] relationship between an older man and a younger man. ] would understand."<ref>Hank Hyena, .</ref> | |||
{{further information|Polygamy in Christianity}} | |||
Early ] Apostle ] taught that Jesus was a ] who was married to Mary Magdalene, ], and ], and fathered children with them. He also taught that the ] was Jesus' own wedding.<ref>Orson Hyde, Conference message, October 6, 1854, Journal of Discourses 2:82</ref><ref>''Inside Today's Mormonism'' by Richard Abanes 2007 {{ISBN|0-7369-1968-6}} page 239</ref><ref>''A Disparity in Doctrine and Theology'' by E Roberts 2011 {{ISBN|1-4497-1210-X}} page 54</ref><ref>{{cite web|author1=Cky J. Carrigan|title=Did Jesus Christ Marry and Father Children?|url=http://www.emnr.org/papers/jesusmarry.htm|publisher=Evangelical Ministries to New Religions|access-date=4 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141011174936/http://www.emnr.org/papers/jesusmarry.htm|archive-date=11 October 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> This idea is not official LDS doctrine,<ref>{{cite web|last1=Barams|first1=Cooper|title=Do Mormons Believe that Jesus Christ Was Married and Practiced Polygamy?|url=http://bible-truth.org/LDSpolygamy.html|access-date=4 March 2015}}</ref> although it has certainly entered into ].<ref>{{citation |author-link= Orson Pratt |first= Orson |last= Pratt |contribution= Celestial Marriage |title= ] |volume= 1 |issue= 10 |page= 159 |date=October 1853 |contribution-url= http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/NCMP1820-1846/id/18108 }}</ref><ref>], Journal Entry 1883-07-22, reporting on a sermon given by ].</ref><ref>], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131102031508/http://www.mrm.org/files/images/was-jesus-married-letter.jpg |date=2013-11-02 }}, 1963.{{better source needed|date=June 2013}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | == |
||
The text of the naked youth is puzzling for conventional interpreters because it associates an unnamed and suggestively erotic youth very closely with Jesus. Moreover, the text only appears in Mark 14:51-53, which has led to the tradition that John Mark wrote himself into the text. Because this apologetic interpretation has been largely dismissed by scholars,{{citation needed|date=December 2012}} it leaves open suggestions as to the identity of the young man, especially given the erotically-charged texture surrounding his brief appearance.<ref>Robert J. Myles, ''Dandy Discipleship: A Queering of Mark’s Male Disciples'' JMMS 4:2 (2010), p. 66-81. http://www.jmmsweb.org/issues/volume4/number2/pp66-81</ref> | |||
==Homosexuality== | |||
The ], fragments of which were contained in the controversial ] by ], has led to various interpretations concerning the views of an ancient group called the ]. The ''Secret Gospel of Mark'' states that Jesus taught the ''secrets of the Kingdom of God'' alone to a partially clothed youth during one night. Some modern commentators interpret it as a baptism,<ref>Robert J. Miller, ''The Complete Gospels'', Polebridge Press 1994, p. 411. ISBN 0-06-065587-9.</ref> or an ] for a non-sexual initiation into a ] religion. | |||
{{redirect|Gay Jesus|artistic depictions|List of works depicting Jesus as LGBT}} | |||
===Disciple whom Jesus loved=== | |||
Some{{Citation needed|date=June 2011}} see a connection between the youth of the "Secret Gospel of Mark" and the mysterious youth following Jesus during ], who loses his cloak while trying to escape, mentioned in the ] ]; and the young man or angel clad only in white that Mark mentions was found in the ]. Most scholars however see the so-called ] as a modern hoax.{{Citation needed|date=September 2011}} | |||
⚫ | {{Main article|Disciple whom Jesus loved}} | ||
⚫ | ]]] | ||
The ] makes references to the "disciple whom Jesus loved" (John 13:23,<ref>{{bibleverse|John|13:23}}</ref> John 19:26,<ref>{{bibleverse|John|19:26}}</ref> John 21:7–20),<ref>{{bibleverse|John|21:7–20}}</ref> a phrase which does not occur in the ]. In the text, this "beloved disciple" is present at the ], with Jesus' mother, ]. The "disciple whom Jesus loved" may be a self-reference by the author of the Gospel (John 21:24), traditionally regarded as ]. In subsequent centuries, the reference was used by those who implied a ] or ] reading of the relationship. For example, scholar ] says Saint ], in his work {{lang|la|De spiritali amicitia}} ("Spiritual Friendship"), referred to the relationship of Jesus and John the Apostle as a "marriage" and held it out as an example sanctioning friendships between clerics.<ref>Louis Crompton, ''Homosexuality and Civilization'', p. 180</ref> | |||
⚫ | ] may have been relying on a pre-existing tradition when he defended his relationship with the ]: "I wish to speak in my own behalf and not to have it thought to be a defect, for Jesus Christ did the same, and therefore I cannot be blamed. Christ had his son John, and I have my George."<ref>''Royal Panoply, Brief Lives Of The English Monarchs'', Carrolly Erickson, St. Martin's Press (May 2, 2006). {{ISBN|0-312-31643-7}}</ref> ] wrote to similar effect in his 1748–1749 poem ''Palladium'', which includes the lines: "This good Jesus, how do you think He got John to sleep in his bed? Can't you see he was his ]?"<ref>T. Blanning, Frederick the Great</ref> | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The |
||
⚫ | Others who have given voice to this interpretation of the relationship between Jesus and John have been the philosophers ] and ].<ref>Louis Crompton, ''Homosexuality and Civilization'', p. 111.</ref> ], a bishop, discussed the possible homoerotic inclinations of Jesus in a sermon in 2005. Robinson's claim has been criticized, including by David W. Virtue, who editorialized by calling it an "appalling ]ism from the liberal lobby which will spin even the remotest thing to turn it into a hint that Biblical figures are gay".<ref name="Gene Robinson">{{Cite news |author= Day, Elizabeth |title= Jesus might have been homosexual, says the first openly gay bishop |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1487002/Jesus-might-have-been-homosexual-says-the-first-openly-gay-bishop.html |work= ] |date= April 3, 2005 |location= London |access-date= January 29, 2010}}</ref> | ||
== “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife...’”== | |||
In mid-September 2012, ], the ] at ], published a paper, "Jesus said to them, ‘My wife…’" A New Coptic Gospel Papyrus, with contributions by ], that describes a new codex (that King calls elsewhere the ]), thus: "Published here for the first time is a fragment of a fourth-century ] ] in ] containing a dialogue between Jesus and his disciples in which Jesus speaks of 'my wife.' This is the only extant ancient text which explicitly portrays Jesus as referring to a wife. It does ''not'', however, provide evidence that the historical Jesus was married, given the late date of the fragment and the probable date of original composition only in the second half of the second century. Nevertheless, if the second century date of composition is correct, the fragment does provide direct evidence that claims about Jesus’s marital status first arose over a century after the death of Jesus in the context of intra-Christian controversies over sexuality, marriage, and discipleship."<ref>, ] with contributions by ], draft published 18 September 2012, for later publication in ] 106:1, January 2013, accessed 20 September 2012</ref><ref>, ] and ] images plus transcription of ] and translation into ], ], accessed 20 September 2012</ref><ref>, Ariel Sabar, ].com, 18 September 2012, accessed 20 September 2012 (image recto)</ref><ref>, David Haglund, ], 19 September 2012, accessed 20 September 2012 (image and video story)</ref> | |||
], theologian, and the author of ''Jesus Acted Up: A Gay and Lesbian Manifesto'' and ''Queering Christ: Beyond Jesus Acted Up'',<ref>{{cite web|last1=Hansen|first1=Jamie|title=Goss challenges traditional Christian beliefs|url=http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2002/12/05/Culture/Goss-Challenges.Traditional.Christian.Beliefs-336580.shtml|archive-url=https://archive.today/20070810074838/http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2002/12/05/Culture/Goss-Challenges.Traditional.Christian.Beliefs-336580.shtml|url-status=dead|archive-date=10 August 2007|access-date=4 March 2015}}</ref> said of the interaction between Jesus and John, it "is a ] relationship between an older man and a younger man. A Greek reader would understand."<ref>Hank Hyena, {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110217080422/http://www.salon.com/feature/1998/04/cov_10feature.html |date=February 17, 2011 }}.</ref> Theologian Ismo Dunderberg argues that the absence of accepted Greek terms for "lover" and "beloved" discounts an erotic reading.<ref>{{cite book|last=Dunderberg|first=Ismo|title=The Beloved Disciple in Conflict?: Revisiting the Gospels of John and Thomas|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=odESDAAAQBAJ|year=2006|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-928496-2|page=176}}</ref> In contrast, the writer and theologian Robert Gagnon has argued that the Greek word translated as "loved" is {{transliteration|grc|]}} (used, for example, in John 3:16:<ref>{{bibleverse|John|3:16}}</ref> "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, {{transl|grc|]}}.<ref>Robert A. J. Gagnon, ''The Bible and homosexual practice'' (2001)</ref> On the other hand, Theodore W. Jennings Jr. notes that "eros does not occur either in the New Testament or in the ]", and that these use {{transliteration|grc|agape}} to refer to "the love of a husband for his wife or even to the illicit loves of inordinate desire", including throughout the explicitly erotic ].<ref>Theodore W. Jennings, Jr. '' The Man Jesus Loved'' (2003)</ref> | |||
⚫ | ===Naked youth=== | ||
{{main|Naked fugitive}} | |||
The Gospel of Mark 14:51–52 describes how in the ], "A young man, wearing nothing but a linen garment, was following Jesus. When they seized him, he fled naked, leaving his garment behind."<ref>{{bibleverse|Mark|14:50–52}}</ref> The text of the ] is puzzling for some authors; moreover, the text only appears in Mark, which has led some commentators to allege that ], traditionally held to be the author of the Gospel of Mark, was describing himself as the youth.<ref>Robert J. Myles, '' {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130701040943/http://www.jmmsweb.org/issues/volume4/number2/pp66-81 |date=2013-07-01 }}'' JMMS 4:2 (2010), p. 66–81.</ref> | |||
The separate and non-canonical ]—fragments of which were contained in the controversial ] by ], which ] claimed to have discovered in 1958—states that Jesus during one night taught "the mystery of the kingdom of God" alone to a youth wearing only a linen cloth. This has been linked to the views of an ancient group called the ]. Some modern commentators interpret it as a baptism, others as some form of sexual initiation, and others as an ] for a non-sexual initiation into a ] sect.<ref>{{cite book |first=Robert J. |last=Miller |title=The Complete Gospels: annotated Scholars Version |publisher=HarperSanFrancisco |year=1994 |page= |isbn=9780060655877 |url=https://archive.org/details/completegospels00robe/page/411 }}</ref> However, the authorship of Secret Mark is still a matter of debate.<ref name="Charlesworth">Pheme Perkins, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221227072424/https://books.google.com/books?id=GZOtAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA663 |date=2022-12-27 }}, in ], Brian Rhea, Petr Pokorny (editors); ''Jesus Research: New Methodologies and Perceptions'' (2014), pp. 663-664, ], ]: ], {{ISBN|978-0-8028-6728-5}}.</ref> Some scholars find it authentic, while others consider it to be Smith's ],<ref name="Charlesworth" /> while still others believe it to be ].<ref name="Charlesworth" /> | |||
==Salvation as sexual union with Christ== | |||
⚫ | {{main|Bride of Christ}} | ||
⚫ | The Bride of Christ is a ] for the ], likening the relationship between ] and ] to a ] pointing to a future wedding, when Christians are re-united with Jesus. In the ] (John 3:22–36),<ref>{{bibleverse|John|3:22–36}}</ref> ] speaks in terms of himself as a "]" with the implication that Christ the bridegroom (see also ] 9:15)<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|9:15}}</ref> is coming to meet his bride, although there is nothing specific to identify the bride. ] such as ] applied the image to the Church.<ref>Cyprian of Carthage, De Ecclesiae Catholicae Unitate, 4–6</ref> | ||
A number of Christian sects such as the ] instead took to describing ] as an intimate or erotic union with Jesus, although this interpretation is widely condemned in mainstream theology. ]'s description of her most famous vision has been interpreted by secular writers, such as ], as "a metaphor for some serious sex";<ref>{{cite book|last=Brown|first=Dan|author-link=Dan Brown|year=2000|title=Angels & Demons|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GXznEnKwTdAC&pg=PA285|location=New York, NY|publisher=Washington Square Press|page=285|isbn=978-1-4165-8082-9}}</ref> the view of Teresa having a sexual relationship with Jesus, in her visions, is exemplified by the poster art for '']'', a 2007 film by ]. | |||
The ] Christian group actively promotes the view that a sexual relationship with Jesus would be desirable, encouraging devotees to imagine during sexual activity that it is Jesus who is having sex with them,<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090429093717/http://www.thefamily.org/dossier/statements/lj.htm |date=2009-04-29 }}</ref> and equate prophecy with Jesus' ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.xfamily.org/index.php/Golden_seeds |title=Golden seeds |access-date=2009-05-08 |archive-date=2009-04-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090414150500/http://www.xfamily.org/index.php/Golden_seeds |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==In fiction, art, and imagination== | ==In fiction, art, and imagination== | ||
The Irish surrealist painter ] depicted Jesus as ] in his ''Christ Androgyne'' (1943),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/christ-androgyne-122535 |title=Christ Androgyne - Colin Middleton |accessdate=25 May 2022}}</ref> currently in the ]. Middleton added female characteristics to Christ's body, including one naked breast. The work can be interpreted as sexual, or as a general symbol of suffering humanity during World War II.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nmni.com/collections/art/paintings/belumu365 |title=Christ Androgyne - Colin Middleton, Ulster Museum |accessdate=25 May 2022}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | The |
||
The 1976 fictional poem '']'' by ] speculated what it would have been like if Jesus had had several sexual encounters with other men – including with ], and a graphic description of Jesus' sexual encounter with a Roman soldier; Christian opposition to the poem's suggestions resulted in the '']'' court case, a famous ] trial.<ref name="Pink News Blasphemy">{{cite web|author1=Staff Writer|title=The gay poem that broke blasphemy laws|url=http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2008/01/10/the-gay-poem-that-broke-blasphemy-laws/|website=pinknews.co.uk|publisher=Pink News|access-date=25 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603121627/http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2008/01/10/the-gay-poem-that-broke-blasphemy-laws/|archive-date=3 June 2012|date=10 January 2008|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Some Christians, however, believe that if Jesus was '']'', he must have been a sexual being. The '']'' Christian cult actively promotes the view that a sexual relationship with Jesus would be desirable, encouraging devotees to imagine during sexual activity that it is Jesus who is having sex with them,<ref></ref> and equate prophecy with Jesus' ].<ref></ref> Historic Christian figures have also been accused of similar thoughts. ]'s description of her most famous vision has been interpreted by secular writers, such as ], as ''a metaphor for ]'';<ref>Dan Brown, '']''</ref> the view of Teresa having a sexual relationship with Jesus, in her visions, is exemplified by the ] art for '']'', a 2007 film by ].<ref>due to copyright restrictions, see '']'' article for poster</ref> | |||
'']'', a 2020 novel by American author ], follows a fictional wife of Jesus named Ana.<ref>{{cite news|title=The wife of Jesus: the North Carolina connection|author=D. G. Martin|author-link=D. G. Martin|work=]|date=May 27, 2020}}</ref> The two have sex regularly while they are together, however their only child is stillborn and the couple otherwise agrees to use ]s. | |||
⚫ | The perceived ] of the ] has been commented upon, and occasionally portrayed explicitly in modern art; for ] reasons, this was depicted in the controversial ''Jesus with Erection'' poster, a concept which has also been depicted for serious reasons in sculpture by ].<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/sep/03/art.religion | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Cock and bull | first=Julian | last=Baggini | date=September 3, 2008 | access-date=May 23, 2010}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
⚫ | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
*] | *] | ||
⚫ | *] | ||
==Notes== | |||
{{Reflist|group=note|30em}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
{{Jesus footer}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Sexuality Of Jesus}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Sexuality Of Jesus}} | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
⚫ | ] |
Latest revision as of 14:45, 17 December 2024
Traditional understanding and theories on the sexuality of Jesus
Part of a series on |
Jesus in Christianity |
Jesus in Islam |
Background |
Jesus in history |
Perspectives on Jesus |
Jesus in culture |
The traditional understanding of Christian churches and theologians is that Jesus never married and remained celibate until his death. However, this has not prevented speculation about alternative and fringe theories of his sexuality, as both the gospels and the New Testament reveal little on the subject.
Cultural background
In first century Judaea, sexual immorality in Second Temple Judaism included incest, impure thoughts, homosexual relations, adultery, and bestiality. According to the rabbinic interpretation of Genesis 2:24, "a man shall leave his father and his mother" forbids a man from having relations with his father's wife and his own biological mother; "cleave to his wife" forbids a man from having more than one wife, having relations with another woman; and "they shall become one flesh" forbids a man from having relations with non-human beings (such as animals). Jesus states in the gospels that he came "not to abolish, but to fulfill the law", and at his various trials, no one could testify that Jesus broke them (Matthew 5:17, Matthew 26:59–60).
Celibacy
Mainstream Christian thinking typically assumes Jesus to have remained celibate and without a defined sexuality, living a pious life free from sins such as lust or fornication.
Eunuchdom
In the Gospel of Matthew 19:3–12, Jesus is reported to have referred to the behavior of eunuchs to illustrate a desirable approach to sexuality: "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake." The term "eunuch" normally referred to a castrated man. Several theologians and Bible commentators have interpreted this passage as indicating Jesus's support for complete celibacy.
The early Christian writer Origen who was purported to have interpreted Jesus' words literally, was alleged to have castrated himself as an act of devotion. The early Church Father Tertullian wrote that Jesus himself lived as a "eunuch", likewise encouraged people to adopt this practice.
Corporeal genitalia
Christ is ascribed a male human body during his time on Earth, including a set of male genitalia. The Circumcision is a major event of the early Life of Jesus, originally described in Luke as taking place shortly after the Presentation at the temple in accordance with the Jewish law followed by Mary and Joseph. The Holy Prepuce, or foreskin, removed from Jesus's body is a major Christian relic and is described by one scholar as representing a focus on the humanity of Jesus.
Beginning in the 13th century, European art would break with Christian tradition of hiding Jesus's genitalia using clothing and composition, instead depicting Christ with a visible or even physically erect phallus. This "display of the genitals" was coined in art scholarship as the ostentatio genitalium, mirroring the ostentatio vulnerum, or "display of the wounds", during the Passion.
Heterosexuality
Mary Magdalene
See also: Mary Magdalene § SpeculationsThe non-canonical 3rd-century Gospel of Philip, using Coptic variants of the Greek κοινωνός (koinōnos), describes Jesus' relationship with Mary Magdalene. The gospel uses cognates of koinōnos and Coptic equivalents to refer both to the literal pairing of men and women in marriage and sexual intercourse, but also metaphorically, referring to a spiritual partnership, and the reunification of the Gnostic Christian with the divine realm.
The Gospel of Philip mentions Mary Magdalene as one of three women named Mary "who always walked with the Lord" (Philip 59.6–11). The work also says that the Lord loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often (Philip 63.34–36). Author John Dickson argues that it was common in early Christianity to kiss a fellow believer by way of greeting (1 Peter 5:14), thus such kissing would have no romantic connotations. Kripal writes that "the historical sources are simply too contradictory and simultaneously too silent" to make absolute declarations regarding Jesus' sexuality.
Bart Ehrman, a scholar of the Greek New Testament and early Christianity, concludes that historical evidence says nothing at all about Jesus' sexuality—"certainly nothing to indicate that Jesus and Mary had a sexual relationship of any kind". Ehrman says that the question people ask him most often is whether Mary Magdalene and Jesus of Nazareth married each other (after the claim was popularized in The Da Vinci Code):
It is not true that the Dead Sea Scrolls contained Gospels that discussed Mary and Jesus. ... Nor is it true that the marriage of Mary and Jesus is repeatedly discussed in the Gospels that didn't make it into the New Testament. In fact, it is never discussed at all—never even mentioned, not even once. ... It is not true that the Gospel of Philip calls Mary Jesus' spouse.
Polygamy
Further information: Polygamy in ChristianityEarly Latter Day Saints Apostle Orson Hyde taught that Jesus was a polygamist who was married to Mary Magdalene, Martha, and Mary of Bethany, and fathered children with them. He also taught that the marriage at Cana was Jesus' own wedding. This idea is not official LDS doctrine, although it has certainly entered into Mormon folklore.
Homosexuality
"Gay Jesus" redirects here. For artistic depictions, see List of works depicting Jesus as LGBT.Disciple whom Jesus loved
Main article: Disciple whom Jesus lovedThe Gospel of John makes references to the "disciple whom Jesus loved" (John 13:23, John 19:26, John 21:7–20), a phrase which does not occur in the Synoptic Gospels. In the text, this "beloved disciple" is present at the crucifixion of Jesus, with Jesus' mother, Mary. The "disciple whom Jesus loved" may be a self-reference by the author of the Gospel (John 21:24), traditionally regarded as John the Apostle. In subsequent centuries, the reference was used by those who implied a homosocial or homoerotic reading of the relationship. For example, scholar Louis Crompton says Saint Aelred of Rievaulx, in his work De spiritali amicitia ("Spiritual Friendship"), referred to the relationship of Jesus and John the Apostle as a "marriage" and held it out as an example sanctioning friendships between clerics.
James I of England may have been relying on a pre-existing tradition when he defended his relationship with the George Villiers of Buckingham: "I wish to speak in my own behalf and not to have it thought to be a defect, for Jesus Christ did the same, and therefore I cannot be blamed. Christ had his son John, and I have my George." Frederick the Great wrote to similar effect in his 1748–1749 poem Palladium, which includes the lines: "This good Jesus, how do you think He got John to sleep in his bed? Can't you see he was his Ganymede?"
Others who have given voice to this interpretation of the relationship between Jesus and John have been the philosophers Denis Diderot and Jeremy Bentham. Gene Robinson, a bishop, discussed the possible homoerotic inclinations of Jesus in a sermon in 2005. Robinson's claim has been criticized, including by David W. Virtue, who editorialized by calling it an "appalling deconstructionism from the liberal lobby which will spin even the remotest thing to turn it into a hint that Biblical figures are gay".
Bob Goss, theologian, and the author of Jesus Acted Up: A Gay and Lesbian Manifesto and Queering Christ: Beyond Jesus Acted Up, said of the interaction between Jesus and John, it "is a pederastic relationship between an older man and a younger man. A Greek reader would understand." Theologian Ismo Dunderberg argues that the absence of accepted Greek terms for "lover" and "beloved" discounts an erotic reading. In contrast, the writer and theologian Robert Gagnon has argued that the Greek word translated as "loved" is agape (used, for example, in John 3:16: "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, eros. On the other hand, Theodore W. Jennings Jr. notes that "eros does not occur either in the New Testament or in the Septuagint", and that these use agape to refer to "the love of a husband for his wife or even to the illicit loves of inordinate desire", including throughout the explicitly erotic Song of Solomon.
Naked youth
Main article: Naked fugitiveThe Gospel of Mark 14:51–52 describes how in the Garden of Gethsemane, "A young man, wearing nothing but a linen garment, was following Jesus. When they seized him, he fled naked, leaving his garment behind." The text of the naked youth is puzzling for some authors; moreover, the text only appears in Mark, which has led some commentators to allege that Mark the Evangelist, traditionally held to be the author of the Gospel of Mark, was describing himself as the youth.
The separate and non-canonical Secret Gospel of Mark—fragments of which were contained in the controversial Mar Saba letter by Clement of Alexandria, which Morton Smith claimed to have discovered in 1958—states that Jesus during one night taught "the mystery of the kingdom of God" alone to a youth wearing only a linen cloth. This has been linked to the views of an ancient group called the Carpocratians. Some modern commentators interpret it as a baptism, others as some form of sexual initiation, and others as an allegory for a non-sexual initiation into a gnostic sect. However, the authorship of Secret Mark is still a matter of debate. Some scholars find it authentic, while others consider it to be Smith's forgery, while still others believe it to be apocryphon.
Salvation as sexual union with Christ
Main article: Bride of ChristThe Bride of Christ is a metaphor for the Ecclesia, likening the relationship between Christians and Jesus to a betrothal pointing to a future wedding, when Christians are re-united with Jesus. In the Gospel of John (John 3:22–36), John the Baptist speaks in terms of himself as a "best man" with the implication that Christ the bridegroom (see also Matthew 9:15) is coming to meet his bride, although there is nothing specific to identify the bride. Church Fathers such as Cyprian applied the image to the Church.
A number of Christian sects such as the Brethren of the Free Spirit instead took to describing salvation through Christ as an intimate or erotic union with Jesus, although this interpretation is widely condemned in mainstream theology. Teresa of Avila's description of her most famous vision has been interpreted by secular writers, such as Dan Brown, as "a metaphor for some serious sex"; the view of Teresa having a sexual relationship with Jesus, in her visions, is exemplified by the poster art for Theresa: The Body of Christ, a 2007 film by Ray Loriga.
The Children of God Christian group actively promotes the view that a sexual relationship with Jesus would be desirable, encouraging devotees to imagine during sexual activity that it is Jesus who is having sex with them, and equate prophecy with Jesus' ejaculation.
In fiction, art, and imagination
The Irish surrealist painter Colin Middleton depicted Jesus as androgynous in his Christ Androgyne (1943), currently in the Ulster Museum. Middleton added female characteristics to Christ's body, including one naked breast. The work can be interpreted as sexual, or as a general symbol of suffering humanity during World War II.
The 1976 fictional poem The Love That Dares to Speak Its Name by James Kirkup speculated what it would have been like if Jesus had had several sexual encounters with other men – including with Pontius Pilate, and a graphic description of Jesus' sexual encounter with a Roman soldier; Christian opposition to the poem's suggestions resulted in the Whitehouse v Lemon court case, a famous blasphemous libel trial.
The Book of Longings, a 2020 novel by American author Sue Monk Kidd, follows a fictional wife of Jesus named Ana. The two have sex regularly while they are together, however their only child is stillborn and the couple otherwise agrees to use contraceptives.
The perceived sadomasochism of the crucifixion has been commented upon, and occasionally portrayed explicitly in modern art; for satirical reasons, this was depicted in the controversial Jesus with Erection poster, a concept which has also been depicted for serious reasons in sculpture by Terence Koh.
See also
Notes
- In the ancient Middle East and Asia, eunuchs often served as officials overseeing harems, or in other Royal positions. See Encyclopaedia of the Orient Archived 2020-12-03 at the Wayback Machine for more details.
- There is some controversy in this statement as in context, spado, which in most cases means "eunuch", is generally translated as "virgin" as in here and a fuller explanation can be found here. e.g. Tertullian, On Monogamy, 3: "...He stands before you, if you are willing to copy him, as a voluntary spado (eunuch) in the flesh." And elsewhere: "The Lord Himself opened the kingdom of heaven to eunuchs and He Himself lived as a eunuch. The apostle also, following His example, made himself a eunuch..."
References
- Genesis 2:24
- "Sexual Immorality - Jewish Theological Seminary".
- Weiner, Moshe (2009). Sheva Mitzvot Hashem [Seven Laws of God] (in Hebrew). Vol. 2. Pittsburgh: Ask Noah International. pp. 429–30 fn. 5. ISBN 978-0-9814811-4-2.
- Matthew 5:17
- Matthew 26:59–60
- Matthew 19:3–12
- J. David Hester (2005). Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19:12 and Transgressive Sexualities. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 28, No. 1, 13–40 (2005)
- Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem i.29.
- 21
- Dzon, Mary. The Quest for the Christ Child in the Later Middle Ages, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2017, p. 221, ISBN 9780812248845
- Leo Steinberg: '«Adams Verbrechen». In: Christoph Geissmar-Brandi, Eleonora Louis (eds.): Glaube Hoffnung Liebe Tod. Klagenfurt, 1996. p. 170.
- Dukes, Hunter (April 14, 2022). "*Ostentatio Genitalium* in Renaissance Art". The Public Domain Review. Retrieved October 9, 2022.
- Marjanen, Antti (1996). The Woman Jesus Loved: Mary Magdalene in the Nag Hammadi Library and Related Documents. Leiden: Brill. pp. 151–60 et passim. ISBN 9004106588.
- King, Karen L. "Women in Ancient Christianity: The New Discoveries". Frontline: The First Christians. Web: 2 November 2009.
- 1 Peter 5:14
- The Christ Files: How Historians Know What They Know About Jesus, John Dickson, p. 95 (Sydney South: Blue Bottle Books, 2006). ISBN 1-921137-54-1
- Jeffrey John Kripal, The Serpent's Gift: Gnostic Reflections on the Study of Religion, p. 52 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007). ISBN 0-226-45380-4 ISBN 0-226-45381-2
- B. D. Ehrman, Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene: The Followers of Jesus in History and Legend. New York: Oxford, 2006. p. 248.
- Orson Hyde, Conference message, October 6, 1854, Journal of Discourses 2:82
- Inside Today's Mormonism by Richard Abanes 2007 ISBN 0-7369-1968-6 page 239
- A Disparity in Doctrine and Theology by E Roberts 2011 ISBN 1-4497-1210-X page 54
- Cky J. Carrigan. "Did Jesus Christ Marry and Father Children?". Evangelical Ministries to New Religions. Archived from the original on October 11, 2014. Retrieved March 4, 2015.
- Barams, Cooper. "Do Mormons Believe that Jesus Christ Was Married and Practiced Polygamy?". Retrieved March 4, 2015.
- Pratt, Orson (October 1853), "Celestial Marriage", The Seer, vol. 1, p. 159
- Wilford Woodruff, Journal Entry 1883-07-22, reporting on a sermon given by Joseph F. Smith.
- Joseph Fielding Smith, Handwritten note responding to letter from J. Ricks Smith Archived 2013-11-02 at the Wayback Machine, 1963.
- John 13:23
- John 19:26
- John 21:7–20
- Louis Crompton, Homosexuality and Civilization, p. 180
- Royal Panoply, Brief Lives Of The English Monarchs, Carrolly Erickson, St. Martin's Press (May 2, 2006). ISBN 0-312-31643-7
- T. Blanning, Frederick the Great
- Louis Crompton, Homosexuality and Civilization, p. 111.
- Day, Elizabeth (April 3, 2005). "Jesus might have been homosexual, says the first openly gay bishop". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved January 29, 2010.
- Hansen, Jamie. "Goss challenges traditional Christian beliefs". Archived from the original on August 10, 2007. Retrieved March 4, 2015.
- Hank Hyena, "Was Jesus Gay: A search for the messiah's true sexuality leads to a snare of lusty theories", p.2, 1998–04 Archived February 17, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
- Dunderberg, Ismo (2006). The Beloved Disciple in Conflict?: Revisiting the Gospels of John and Thomas. OUP Oxford. p. 176. ISBN 978-0-19-928496-2.
- John 3:16
- Robert A. J. Gagnon, The Bible and homosexual practice (2001)
- Theodore W. Jennings, Jr. The Man Jesus Loved (2003)
- Mark 14:50–52
- Robert J. Myles, Dandy Discipleship: A Queering of Mark's Male Disciples Archived 2013-07-01 at the Wayback Machine JMMS 4:2 (2010), p. 66–81.
- Miller, Robert J. (1994). The Complete Gospels: annotated Scholars Version. HarperSanFrancisco. p. 411. ISBN 9780060655877.
- ^ Pheme Perkins, "Apocryphal Gospels and the Historical Jesus" Archived 2022-12-27 at the Wayback Machine, in James H. Charlesworth, Brian Rhea, Petr Pokorny (editors); Jesus Research: New Methodologies and Perceptions (2014), pp. 663-664, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids: Michigan, ISBN 978-0-8028-6728-5.
- John 3:22–36
- Matthew 9:15
- Cyprian of Carthage, De Ecclesiae Catholicae Unitate, 4–6
- Brown, Dan (2000). Angels & Demons. New York, NY: Washington Square Press. p. 285. ISBN 978-1-4165-8082-9.
- The "Loving Jesus" Revelation Archived 2009-04-29 at the Wayback Machine
- "Golden seeds". Archived from the original on April 14, 2009. Retrieved May 8, 2009.
- "Christ Androgyne - Colin Middleton". Retrieved May 25, 2022.
- "Christ Androgyne - Colin Middleton, Ulster Museum". Retrieved May 25, 2022.
- Staff Writer (January 10, 2008). "The gay poem that broke blasphemy laws". pinknews.co.uk. Pink News. Archived from the original on June 3, 2012. Retrieved February 25, 2015.
- D. G. Martin (May 27, 2020). "The wife of Jesus: the North Carolina connection". Independent Tribune.
- Baggini, Julian (September 3, 2008). "Cock and bull". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 23, 2010.
Jesus | |
---|---|
Chronology of Jesus's life |
|
New Testament | |
Historicity | |
Depictions | |
Christianity | |
In other faiths | |
Family |
|
Related | |