| Revision as of 17:40, 1 December 2013 editKierzek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,733 edits Belated welcome | Latest revision as of 22:19, 26 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me. ] (]) 17:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC) | If you have any questions, see the ], add a question to the ] or ask me. ] (]) 17:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Gamergate notice == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |'''Please read this notification carefully:'''<br>A ] has authorised the use of ] for pages related to the ].<br>The details of these sanctions are described ]. | |||
| ] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged ]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| | Commons-emblem-notice.svg | |||
| | icon size = 50px}} '''<span style="font-family:Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 17:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Gamergate == | |||
| I understand the sanctions. I was working to improve the article based on the notices on the top of the page. The article was too long, and relied too heavily on the quotes of others. | |||
| While reviewing the article, I also noted a lack of objectivity in language. In many cases, accusations from both sides of the controversy are presented either as "truth" or a "claim" of truth. In most cases there is no hard evidence that can be brought to differentiate between the two. Most of what either side says is a "claim" at this point. | |||
| I am not a gamer. Just interested in making something useful out of a page that can be of little use to anyone who isn't heavily involved. | |||
Latest revision as of 22:19, 26 March 2022
Welcome
Hello and a belated welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Misplaced Pages's core policies.
- Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Misplaced Pages is not a forum.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me. Kierzek (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Gamergate notice
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Acroterion (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Gamergate
I understand the sanctions. I was working to improve the article based on the notices on the top of the page. The article was too long, and relied too heavily on the quotes of others.
While reviewing the article, I also noted a lack of objectivity in language. In many cases, accusations from both sides of the controversy are presented either as "truth" or a "claim" of truth. In most cases there is no hard evidence that can be brought to differentiate between the two. Most of what either side says is a "claim" at this point.
I am not a gamer. Just interested in making something useful out of a page that can be of little use to anyone who isn't heavily involved.