| Revision as of 19:02, 10 December 2013 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits →WP:RFAR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:43, 3 December 2024 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,227 edits →Happy Birthday!: replied | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="padding-bottom: 0.5em;">{{Usertalk bar}}</div> | |||
| <noinclude>{{User talk:AGK/Header}}</noinclude>{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{Message}} | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 0 | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:AGK/Archive_ | |||
| |algo = old(10d) | |||
| |format=Y | |||
| |archive = User talk:AGK/Archive/78 | |||
| |minkeepthreads=0 | |||
| }}{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
| |age=8760 | |||
| |target=User talk:AGK/Archive/Index | |||
| }}<div style="float: right" class="infobox"> | |||
| |mask=User talk:AGK/Archive/<#> | |||
| * ] | |||
| |leading_zeros=0 | |||
| * () | |||
| |indexhere=no | |||
| * ]</div>__TOC__ | |||
| |template location=User talk:AGK/Archive/Index template}} | |||
| == AE request concerning Lecen == | |||
| ==Hello, stranger!== | |||
| Hi, after you remarked on an apparent interaction ban violation by Lecen at ], an enforcement request was made at ]. Could you comment at ] on whether this request should be processed by administrators or whether problematic conduct in arbitration fora should be left for arbitrators or clerks to address? Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 17:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, Arcticocean, | |||
| No, nope, nah, nyet, it's not going to work. Go back to your former name! You know us long-time editors don't adapt well to changes, especially small ones. | |||
| : {{ping|Sandstein}} I have commented there. Thanks, ] ]] 17:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Any way, in case you have indeed transitioned to a new identity, I hope I'll run into you on this project in the future (in a positive way, I mean). Just spend some time working on some subject that brings a smile to your face. And stay away from noticeboards. Take care, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 06:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Applicability of the 2013 DS review == | |||
| :You might want to change the target page for the redirect on ]. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, I'm still trying to figure out this business of discretionary sanctions warnings. You confirmed to me that the warning is for misconduct. An administrator cited the ] under "Draft v2", seemingly suggesting that the warning is no longer for misconduct. Does the draft apply presently? | |||
| ::<small>Sorry, the archive bot had buried your message away. I've just restored it.<br/></small>{{xt|And stay away from noticeboards}} – was better advice ever given to a Misplaced Pages editor? :) ] 13:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| Hi Articocean. Have I asked you yet about whether or not you'd be interested in ]? I see you blank your talk page regularly and I'm worried I'm missing my name in the history even though I checked. 😅 I really hope this isn't a duplicate request. ] ] 16:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| This is enormously confusing and I am only trying to understand what is going on. If in the near future all such warnings will be grandfathered in as informational "alerts" issuable by non-admins (as noted in the last section of the draft), then there would seem to be no long-term damage to my having received a warning by mistake. ] (]) 22:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Welcome back== | |||
| Hey there! I just wanted to give you a shoutout for nominating this ] for deletion. I’m surprised it’s been hanging around for about five years now and you definitely did the right thing by calling it out! Also, welcome back! I’m glad to see you’re active again and I hope you’ll stick around this time! Thanks for all your good work!<span id="Saqib:1730576685561:User_talkFTTCLNArcticocean" class="FTTCmt"> — ] (] I ]) 19:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)</span> | |||
| : As a draft, it is not presently in effect. After adoption of the draft, I believe warnings given under the old (that is, our current) system will be treated as both alerts and warnings under the new system. ] ]] 23:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:Thanks for the welcome! It's nice to be contributing again. I have been part of the Misplaced Pages community for nearly 20 years, and after so long I was losing my enthusiasm. However, the break has done me some good. ] 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ::: Under the current system, they can do nothing. Under the new system, they will be able to appeal the warning as if it is a sanction; but if that appeal is successful, they will still be considered to have been "Alerted" in the sense used by the new draft. Is that clear? ] ]] 23:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 10:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for noticing this. We created this template as part of a drive to refresh the WikiProject, but the planned use of the template did not materialise. I have now tagged it for speedy deletion: the deletion is clear-cut and does not necessarily require a TfD. Thanks again, ] 12:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Is there an expected time for when the new system will be in effect? Can a warning issued in the old system be appealed in the new system? ] (]) 23:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| ::::: I cannot give a more exact estimate than that the system will probably be live by February or late January of 2014. Yes, warnings issued under the old system will be treated as sanctions under the new system, and will be appealable under it. Regards, ] ]] 23:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| :: Because of the contentious nature of some of the earlier warnings, my view is that all historic warnings should be treated simply as alerts. This is a very good opportunity to wipe the slate clean and (to mix a metaphor) leave some baggage behind. ] <sup>]</sup> 12:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| @{{U|Roger Davies}} Please double-check everything I have said here. ] ]] 11:56, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Done. My mileage varies slightly, ] <sup>]</sup> 12:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Concerning your request == | |||
| </div> | |||
| I need to ask at this point if you would like for me to add more evidence given the growing number of external and internal links being added to the page by the involved parties. Is whats being added good enough for arbcom purposes, or should I role up my sleeves and dig into the archives such as it were? ] (]) 07:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Alt account == | |||
| : {{ping|TomStar81}} I think the other parties' statements have given us enough to go on. Thanks, ] ]] 20:11, 1 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Glad to hear it. I'd make one suggestion though: consider renaming the case when you accept it. I named it "Ottoman Empire / Turkish naming dispute", but its grown increasingly apparent that there is far more at work here then just the name of the nation. While I would stop short of renaming it "Everyone v RoslynSKP", I think a case name like "RoslynSKP consensus and civility issues" would more accurately reflect the issues our editors seem to be presenting. Otherwise, I'll leave this in your hands. ] (]) 00:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Thanks for your comments. I'll raise the case title for discussion on the list. ] ]] 00:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Hey. Is actually your alt, or is someone messing around? Thanks, ] (]) 21:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive == | |||
| :Ah nevermind, I see you created it. Should have checked the logs first. ] (]) 21:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::No problem. Better safe than sorry! ] 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy Birthday!== | |||
| {| {{WP:WikiProject Good articles/Shell|introduction=Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the ] has begun and will end on December 31, 2013!<br/> | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive!</br> | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them ]--] (]) 23:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |style = background:Darkgreen;border: 1px solid #CC9999; | |||
| }}|} | |||
| |text = <span style="font-family:Book Antiqua;color:#FFFF00;">Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the ].</span>--] (]) 02:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0671 --> | |||
| ==You've got mail!== | |||
| {{tlx|1=you've got mail|2=ts{{=}}12:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| Just in case you don't check your email often, I have send you something quite some time ago. ] 12:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : {{ping|Blurred Lines}} Replied. Thanks, ] ]] 21:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Large user impressed== | |||
| Bishzilla impressed by down-to-earth remark by little arb, edit influential voter guide! More than nice pair of legs in kilt! ] '']'' 00:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC). | |||
| : Your zillaship honours me. ] ]] 12:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2013 GOCE drive wrap-up == | |||
| {| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #dfeff3; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); {{border-radius}} {{box-shadow|8px|8px|12px|rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 )}}" | |||
| | <span style="font-size: 110%;">'''] ] wrap-up newsletter'''</span> | |||
| <div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div> | |||
| <div style="position: absolute; top: -20px; right: -12px;">]</div> | |||
| <hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" /> | |||
| <center>The ''']''' is now ready for review.</center> | |||
| <center>{{red|Sign up for the ]!}} | |||
| – Your project coordinators: {{noping|Torchiest|Torchiest}}, {{noping|Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978}}, {{noping|Jonesey95|Jonesey95}}, and {{noping|The Utahraptor|The Utahraptor}}. | |||
| </center> | |||
| {{center | |||
| | <small> To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from ]. Newsletter delivered by ] (]) 05:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| |} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Diannaa@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Mailing_List --> | |||
| == Blocked IPs == | |||
| *] | |||
| There is a serious backlog of about 20K individual IPs that are blocked without expiration. I have broken the IPs into groups of 5000: ]. So they are effectively blocked until time ends. This creates considerable potential collateral damage as the owners of IPs tend to be not very consistent. Some of these IPs are on dynamic ranges which results in arbitrary blocks of good users. Vast majority of the blocks go back years all the way to 2004 - some were preemptively blocked. Nowadays even open proxies normally do not get indefinite blocks. | |||
| The problem is that no single admin wants to review this many IPs and very few have the technical capability to review. Such a technical review would be non-trivial for individual IPs which in my humble opinion would be a complete waste of time. I feel ArbCom could step in and provide criteria for bulk action. A bulk unblock of all indefinite blocks (with exceptions if the specific single IP unblocks are contested) before - say - 2010 would be a good start. | |||
| Open proxies tend to be better handled at meta as open proxies are a global problem for all wikis. | |||
| --<small> ]</small> <sup>]</sup> 11:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : The most sensible thing to do is obtain a consensus at, say, the administrators' noticeboard for mass-unblocking these IPs. This isn't a problem that would fall under ArbCom's remit. If you open a noticeboard proposal for this matter, I'll happily comment – but as a checkuser and administrator, not an arbitrator. Thanks, ] ]] 12:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Apology & Thank You == | |||
| I owe you an apology since I had earlier said I would leave the rest of the case in your hands, however in filing my clarification request I feel that I have once again infringed on your good graces as the arbitrator overseeing this case. I offer no excuse for the infringement, and apologize for having to inconvenience you once more in this case by bringing you back to rule on the matter of the filing parties. | |||
| That having been said I thank you for your reply on the matter, and since this is my first arbcom case I will keep in mind that parties must be explicitly named in the case in order to be considered filing members. Should the need arise for me to do this again I will endeavor not to make this mistake twice. ] (]) 01:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : You're very gracious, but there is no need: this sort of mistake is very easily fixed! Thank you, ] ]] 12:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for word extension == | |||
| Can I have a time extension as there are only two hours left, to make use of it? --] (]) 21:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : <s>What do you want to discuss in the extra evidence? The extension was to allow your extra words to be accepted into evidence, not for you to submit more evidence and therefore run over the word count again. ] ]] 22:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)</s> | |||
| :: Moving to ]. ] ]] 23:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == The Misplaced Pages Library Survey == | |||
| As a subscriber to one of ]'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this Thanks and cheers, ]<sup> ]|]</sup> 14:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- EdwardsBot 0678 --> | |||
| Thanks, {{u|DaniloDaysOfOurLives}}! ] 17:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==WP:RFAR== | |||
| Thank you, I did get the original message, but when I went to the linked page, I didn't see my name. I'm not sure why. Had the discussion begun by the time that first message had been left on my page? When I didn't see my name there, I figured that the initial message was one informing me of the ''intention'' to begin a discussion there, and that I would be notified once it had been. Sorry that I missed it. I'll look over the material now. Thanks for contacting me. ] (]) 18:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Nightscream}} You can find your case request under ]. --''']]]''' 19:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:43, 3 December 2024
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. |
| Please leave a new message. |
Hello, stranger!
Hi, Arcticocean,
No, nope, nah, nyet, it's not going to work. Go back to your former name! You know us long-time editors don't adapt well to changes, especially small ones.
Any way, in case you have indeed transitioned to a new identity, I hope I'll run into you on this project in the future (in a positive way, I mean). Just spend some time working on some subject that brings a smile to your face. And stay away from noticeboards. Take care, Liz 06:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- You might want to change the target page for the redirect on User:Arcticocean. Liz 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, the archive bot had buried your message away. I've just restored it.
And stay away from noticeboards – was better advice ever given to a Misplaced Pages editor? :) arcticocean ■ 13:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, the archive bot had buried your message away. I've just restored it.
Good article reassessment for 2010 Shanghai fire
2010 Shanghai fire has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Articocean. Have I asked you yet about whether or not you'd be interested in participating here? I see you blank your talk page regularly and I'm worried I'm missing my name in the history even though I checked. 😅 I really hope this isn't a duplicate request. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Welcome back
Hey there! I just wanted to give you a shoutout for nominating this PROMO AUTOBIO for deletion. I’m surprised it’s been hanging around for about five years now and you definitely did the right thing by calling it out! Also, welcome back! I’m glad to see you’re active again and I hope you’ll stick around this time! Thanks for all your good work! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome! It's nice to be contributing again. I have been part of the Misplaced Pages community for nearly 20 years, and after so long I was losing my enthusiasm. However, the break has done me some good. arcticocean 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:WPCGR/Backlog
Template:WPCGR/Backlog has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing this. We created this template as part of a drive to refresh the WikiProject, but the planned use of the template did not materialise. I have now tagged it for speedy deletion: the deletion is clear-cut and does not necessarily require a TfD. Thanks again, arcticocean ■ 12:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Alt account
Hey. Is this actually your alt, or is someone messing around? Thanks, Spicy (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah nevermind, I see you created it. Should have checked the logs first. Spicy (talk) 21:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- No problem. Better safe than sorry! arcticocean ■ 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
 | Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee.--DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC) |
Thanks, DaniloDaysOfOurLives! arcticocean ■ 17:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)