Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:06, 1 January 2014 view sourceCyberpower678 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators26,883 edits Happy New Year← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:46, 3 November 2024 view source Sonic678 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,091 edits Notification: listing of List of Kamen Rider Ryuki charcters at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{nobots}}
{{User talk:Ryulong/Header}}{{bots|deny=SineBot}}{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{banned user|by=the ]|link=]}}
== Japanese translations in video game articles ==
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
{{User talk:Ryulong/Header}}


== e's not dead, e's just restin' ==
There appears to be an issue with using the Japanese translation of PlayStation, as evidenced by several editors' to remove it from the ] article. In searching through ] and other articles, I came across a ] on the subject that you participated in. Since I know very little about the policies/guidelines concerning translation, I was hoping you could enlighten me as to whether or not this belongs in the PlayStation articles and why. Or if you prefer, please feel free to weigh in at the talk page discussion (see ]).


Though the ink is not yet 100% dry, reports of your demise may have been premature. Guerillero moved to oppose, which based on T. Canen's conditional support, movies his vote to oppose as well. Or something. ] (]) 20:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you in advance! --] (]) 22:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
:I already nuked my watch list. Great.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 20:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:Yes, it most certainly does belong (and I see he removed it from the ] article multiple times as well). I have restored the text, used the rationale in the edit summary, and responded on the talk page.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 03:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::Thank you again for your assistance. I am truly indifferent on the matter, but I know there are other editors (such as yourself) that this matters to. Sorry to have dragged you back into the fray. ;) --] (]) 05:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC) :: Do you know how freeing a good watch list nuke is? I do. ] (]) 20:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Yea I did that once too, a ton of crap that I long ago abandoned, every album art cover I uploaded, no need to watch all that anymore. Start from scratch...and leave every WP:* 'tard board off...maybe narrow the focus a little, it'll be fun. ] (]) 20:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::::A lot of my watchlist was to deal with ongoing long term vandalism.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 21:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


Loganmac is disrupting ] now.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 21:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Funimation ==


{{ping|Tarc|Hipocrite}} —<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 21:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Didn't want to post this somewhere as public as ANI, but if you're on LinkedIn, you should be able to contact ] directly - personally I've found that CEOS are often the best people to complain to when their company screws up... ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 15:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
:I sent the email off to their support line already. And I am not on LinkedIn.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 15:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
::Well, I wish you luck - hopefully they'll be willing to comply with the licensing requirements and there won't be any need for you to take it any further. ]&nbsp;]&zwj;] 16:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


:Yea, I'm out the door for dinner date but I left a message for HJ Mitchell, who is a fair admin and is familiar with Logan. IMO this is about as clear cut a case of baiting/stalking as one can get. ] (]) 21:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Note bene ==


These things happen all the time Ryulong; I know its supposed to be "flattery", but I do understand seeing your text in a book that you are not credited for can be a rather stunning blow. Problem solved though, right? ] (]) 14:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC) :And they're still quibbling so hopefully we didn't get your hopes up too much. It seems it'll depend on Canens himself providing a clarifying remark. ] (]) 21:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


:And this is why you should keep your watchlist nuked for a bit (assuming that T Canens meant what I think he meant, and you avoid the ban). Quit thinking about the quality of the encyclopaedia for a bit and focus on your peace of mind. ] (]) 21:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
==December 2013==
::I've only got my regular pages on there now.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 21:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 18:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block -->
:Are you serious. Because I was being gamed by someone on a rapidly changing IP address who for some reason was aware of the warning templates and another IP who showed up to support him I'm blocked? I am done with this site.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 18:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
::I'm sorry, but you made five reverts on that page in the last 24 hours, two of them after receiving an edit warring warning. I don't believe that any of your reverts were covered under the exemptions to 3RR, but I'm willing to reconsider if there's something I have missed. Note that I blocked the IP range that was edit warring, as well. ] (]) 19:01, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
:::I received a warning from ''an IP address'' and there was also the actions of ] who appeared to be working in concert with the other IPs' user. The geolocation is similar. Something fishy was going on.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 19:04, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
::::Ok, I've left a warning for the other IP, as well. I'll block if he reverts again. ] (]) 19:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::I made attempts at communication outside of edit summaries but he kept hopping IPs. Why is it that every time I try to do something right and the other party doesn't communicate effectively and just keeps doing what it wants it bites me in the ass?—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 19:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::Ugh Mark I'm going to have so much shit to do in a few hours because no one ever fucking updates ] and ] despite the fact I have a half-filled out template for them to do so on both pages. Why do I keep getting fucking blocked on Sundays.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 19:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)


Well it was a nice few hours considering all of the bullshit going on behind the scenes on the mailing list.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== ] ==


Sorry that you died again. My email is enabled, so if you need something specific changed on a specific article, contact me and I'll review the merits on my own per ] and consider making the edit myself based on my independent and fully formed review of your proposals and stuff. ] (]) 22:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the above article, I would appreciate your cooperation in retaining the well-sourced material and not removing it wholesale. Also, if you want the citations to take any particular form, I would appreciate your correcting them inasmuch as I have never learned the new method of handling them and prefer to stick by the older method. Sincerely, your friend, ] (]) 07:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:Just watch ] and its related pages and ] (maybe some related pages). The official trademark trumps a single frame from the TV show and a stupid fandom insistence otherwise.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:Five massive direct quotations do not comprise "well-sourced material", neither does unnecessarily focusing on something which has its own separate article. Also, you did not have to revert everything I did on the article outright just to restore those poorly formatted and entirely unnecessary direct quotations.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 07:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:: I was commenting more on a go-forward-for-a-year basis. ] (]) 22:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:Also holy shit just look at all of the citations in the article that use the {{tl|cite web}} template.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 07:43, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Those are really the only pages I'm worried about. Also maybe that BuickCenturyDriver/Don't Feed the Zords will return to troll ]. ALl I do is update a bunch of episode lists because I put in too much of a complex formatting for anyone to possibly use on their own.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::Well, I'm sorry if I offended you, but I worked pretty hard to get everything right, and I don't believe you should have simply destroyed everything. It is better to have more information than less, and I beseech you to make a self-revert lest somebody accuse you of engaging in an edit war. Also, I don't appreciate the scatology; it is really demeaning, and, frankly, demoralizing. Sincerely, ] (]) 07:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::: Roger. Provide a list and I will guarantee coverage. I can do the formatting. Post the list to {{u|HipocriteRLWatcher}} so I can segregate the watchlists. Thanks ] (]) 22:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::The direct quotations are not "more information". They simply clutter up the article and disrupt the reading flow. It is not necessary to provide that many direct quotations when it is much better to summarize them as I had done. It is only pertinent to include quotations when they are of particular notability or import. Simply copying what other people have stated for the sake of having it on the page is not particularly welcomed in formal writing when what they have said can easily be summarized in original words. Similarly, information regarding the murder of Raustein and the happy slapping incidents of Europe need only be summarized on this article per ]. And finally I will not be self-reverting edits I had made in good faith nor will I be refraining from "scatology" or using other strong words in my communication as they do not comprise any ] as they are not directed towards you in particular but to the situation in general. I would appreciate if any further discussion on article content be kept at the section I created on the article's talk page concerning the content I had initially removed and you decided to restore.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 07:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::Salvidrim hit the wrong button on me so I can't do that atm.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Hipocrite}} what do you want me to do again.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::: Make a page with your watchlist that I can watch to figure out what I'm supposed to do while you're gone. ] (]) 22:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::The formatting I have on ] is unnecessarily complex though.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::: Are you... challenging me? ] (]) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::Here's the thing. I update ], ], ], ], and ] on a weekly basis. This involves translating the episode titles, watching the little "next time on..." clip, translating the episode summary for a one sentence summary for Misplaced Pages, check who the writer is for the episode, and then make sure that people don't fuck up the formatting after I've made a new entry. I've already filled out the final episodes of ToQger and started up ] for good measure, even though the titles are tentative and I don't like that color I picked out. Do you seriously want to pick up the slack in these multiple pages that requires knowing something about the plot and deciphering Google Translate's jumbled up garbage because the reading comprehension I gained in Japanese is somewhat waning?—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::: Can I do that if my Japanese is limited to, basically the names of the attacks and defenses that a student of Aikido who has never traveled west of Hawaii would know? Wait, don't answer that, it's just going to depress both of us. ] (]) 22:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::Wait, you mean episode guides don't magically appear on their own? :) ] (]) 22:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::::I'd suggest some fanblogs to use for double checking, but I learned fairly recently that they're just copying what I had been writing for all of the entries. They're going to be totally fucked over after this case. Take that JEFusion and Orends Range.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::::I forgot I also update ] monthly.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


::::::Best wishes to another good contributor that arbcom has dismissed. I hope to see you in the future. ] (]) 22:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Edit warring over the inclusion of a source? ==
:::::::It's clear no one wants me around simply because I raised the issue that their 1RR proposal was already causing me grief.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::::Having seen multiple socks stalk you I understand completely why it's unworkable...it sets you up to be never stop harrassed.] (]) 22:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::: Based on my sources from back when I got ArbCommed, you were likely the casualty of one arb threatening to blow the whole place up if they didn't get what they wanted. I don't know who, because I took a long wikipedia break, and have no idea who the majority of the committee are now. I can't believe I delayed clearing my name from the horrendous ClimateChange ban for GamerGate! ] (]) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::It's fairly obvious that it was either a full site ban or a 1RR ban was going to pass. But maybe this is a blessing in disguise because I was so fucking tired of updating those episode lists.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


Ryulong, I can't comment on any ongoing arbcom case or the like. However, you can find your watchlist key in preferences -> watchlist -> Near the bottom and email an individual it. They will then be able to view your watchlist. What I've not figured out is where you enter the darned thing. ] (]) 22:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Why are you over the inclusion of a reliable source? I disagree with your assertion that "there is no need to source a block of colors that are not text" but I more strongly disapprove of your willingness to edit war over something so trivial! Please consider self-reverting and taking the issue to Talk instead of using edit summaries to discuss the issue. ] (]) 16:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:What is it sourcing? The hex codes? Do you know how trivial that is? Do you know how unnecessary that is? Do you know how obvious that is to anyone who downloads their logotype and opens it up in Paint? It's not necessary. And it is not ''my'' prerogative to argue against its inclusion. I reverted a bold edit to the article. It is up to the parties who feel it should be included to begin a discussion on the talk page rather than simply reverting me. Why is it that no one bothers to do this? Why is it when I restore the status quo I'm the one who gets int rouble and it's edit warring? I'm tired of this bullshit.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
::What happened to ]? An editor made an edit and you reverted - fine, no problem. Another edit reverted your revert and you reverted their revert of your revert - problem. Should the other editors be more communicative? Yeah, they should. But that doesn't absolve you.
::And why would you believe that the colors shouldn't be sourced? They're non-obvious facts. We can quibble over whether using a program to examine the specific colors in an image is original research but clearly there is no reason for us to know that the particular image selected is correct nor is it reasonable to expect editors to go through that when there is a reliable source readily at hand. And we can avoid the discussion altogether if we just do what we always do when there is a question about a fact in an article - we cite a reliable source. ] (]) 17:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::BRD does not require the person who reverted to start a discussion if they themselves are reverted. There should have never been the second revert in thef irst place. And the PDF simply contains the technical information on how to reproduce the colors for internal purposes. Such a primary source isn't necessary in the first place.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:: I agree with ElKevbo. There's never any reason on Misplaced Pages to not source something. And you're right, he's sourcing the RGB values for their colors. Many universities have very specific RGB values and I think it's quite useful to have them sourced. I don't think the original edit was bold in any way. It was adding a reference to a piece of information that was unsourced on Misplaced Pages. And you should be more civil and not call the edit and this discussion "bullshit". — ] (]) 17:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::'''It's not necessary to souce the RGB values''' and I see no such sourcing at any other article. They just list the colors and have the box. The ] page says the colors are green, white, and orange, and has a series of boxes that are green, white, and orange. There is no point in providing a source that shows that not only are the colors green, white, and orange but they happen to be a specific hexadecimal set of green, white, and orange that the article happens to use as well. It's trivial nonsense. And this discussion isn't "bullshit". This situation is as a whole is. I am tired of the nonsense nitpicking on this website and I am tired of having to answer for things that no one in their right mind should give a shit about in the first place.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
::::I'm completely baffled. You seem to believe that you have a right to make multiple reverts in an article. You also seem to believe that we don't need to source material in articles. Is that correct?
::::Look, on some level I agree that it's a tiny bit silly and trivial to source this information. But it's a reliable source that is being appropriately used to support an assertion made in the article so what's the problem? It's something to sigh about and move on, not something to edit war and argue about! ] (]) 17:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::No one's right to revert anything anywhere. That's all I've learned in the last few weeks. That's why I've gotten blocked twice in the past month for edit warring.
:::::It is not necessary to source a color being displayed on an article just because that color happens to be the one mentioned in a reliable source. I'm not discussing this further.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


{{ping|Salvidrim!}} You hit the wrong button.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Your page notice ==
:Oops! <span style="font-family:Sylfaen;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;">☺&nbsp;·&nbsp;]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]</span> 22:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


I wanted to make ] but fuck it.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I just want to be clear on your page notice, as I don't really understand what is and what is not allowed on your page, according to your page notice. So that there will be no confusion next time, am I allowed to leave talkback templates, or will you remove them the next time they are added? Thanks, ] (]) 15:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
:24 hours! Let's go out with my first FA. ] (]) 22:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:Why would I need to keep a talkback tag here? It serves its purpose and directs me to your user talk page so it can be removed.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 15:44, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
::] probably does need to be created, and surely will be at some point. <span style="font-family:Sylfaen;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;">☺&nbsp;·&nbsp;]&nbsp;·&nbsp;]</span> 22:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
::I'm not saying to keep it—I am asking if you even want me to notify you using them. Do you want any talkbacks, or are you fine without them? ] (]) 20:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
:::It is generally fine. I just don't need people sending me <nowiki>{{uw-whatever}}</nowiki>.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 06:17, 14 December 2013 (UTC) :::. Haven't checked BARKS.jp to see if they have anything different.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Yeah is all Barks has.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
:::At least someone wrote ] without me.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


{{ping|Hipocrite|Hell in a Bucket}} I emailed both of you my watchlist token.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
==Reverts==
: ] ] (]) 22:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


] (soon to be ]) and ] updates every Saturday (EST). The first updates at 6 pm EST and the other 6:30 pm EST (jumping forward with the change to EDT). The Ninninger page might need to have its reference links updated because I just copied the old entry on another page and assumed that the link formatting would be exactly the same. Someone's going to have to start a ] page at some point.
Please stop reverting my edits.
] (]) 16:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:No. Your edits are not at all necessary for these pages. There is no need to provide lists on the intercollegiate athletic group pages on the school's academic status.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 16:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
::please see college football's talk page. This has been discussed. You are vandalizing Wikipidea. They are necessary. ] (]) 16:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:::All I see are a bunch of sections tagged "This doesn't match the scope of the article." And my edits do not constitute vandalism. They are reverts of your bold edits to introduce these sections into the articles without any discussion as far as I can tell.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 16:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
::::See the ]. You will not be vandalizing without making a case on that page. You are edit warring. ] (]) 16:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::Read ]. My edits do not constitute that. And I see nothing except massive essays from you on that talk page drowning out any other voices. All I can see is UW Dawgs also disagreeing with you. When you get reverted, which constitutes removing the massive unsourced sections you added to all these pages, '''you do not revert again'''.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 16:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
::::::It seems you're not new to edit warring. Look, I'm here to help. Let me debate with you civilly. Why do you think the tables are unwarranted? ] (]) 16:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::::I have explained my reasons on your user talk page and at ]. There is a consensus to remove them and you simply haven't paid it any attention.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 16:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
* The consensus was reached. I compromised and removed information and no one said anything afterwords. {{unsigned|DMB112}}
*:Please read ] regarding the fact that "no one said anything afterwords".—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


] and ] update every Friday. I'm fairly certain that these update around noon but I just get to them when I remember that the episode aired. Garo has hidden templates with instructions and such in them (check the writer, etc.) and Stardust Crusaders has all of the episodes preplanned but no titles. I think ] updates on this day too. I can't remember.
==Blocked==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''14 days''' for edit warring on ] and ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. &nbsp;] (]) 17:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->


A new issue of ] comes out every month on the 19th so unless it's taking a break for the month which happens every so often ] is updated this often too. I use to pull the new UJ chapter titles from and if a new volume comes out I just try my best to search for blogs posting them and the volume's title.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 23:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
== Unblock request ==


I used to also update ] with cast member updates but I stopped caring a while back.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 23:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I will admit that I edit warred but two weeks is an excessive escalation off of my prior blocks. I attempted all methods of communication with the other user on four different discussion pages, but he refused to listen to me and began personally attacking me as well.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC) | decline = I reviewed your previous block log and can see two blocks in the past four weeks for edit warring, it is apparent that short blocks do not deter you from edit warring, that alone would have been sufficient to justify a longer block. The situation was made considerably worse as there isn't any real evidence of restraint, with nine reverts in 24 hours on ], nine reverts in 24 hours on ], four reverts in 24 hours on ], a technical breach of 3RR which you resolved on ]. You've made approximately 100 edits today reverting DMB112 on various articles including the listed articles above. This is so egregious a breach of policy that I consider two weeks to be lenient. ] (]) 17:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)}}
:You removed my statement that if the block is shortened I'd stick to 1RR. I still stand by that even if the block is cut down to a week.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:59, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
::I think, in light of recent behaviour, a 1RR restriction will be necessary, but I don't agree with it being voluntary or in exchange for a reduced block length. ] (]) 18:16, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Then I will see you next year.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 18:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


] updates Wednesdays. I check for the next week's episode.—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not really related but when the hell was EnglishEfternamn unblocked after I blocked him in 2007 for sockpuppetry and harassing me to the point where there was a new feature to the MediaWiki software created to prevent his harassment?—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 18:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


Could someone inform {{user|Born on Setons}} that he is edit warring at ] by ?—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 18:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC) {{ping|Hipocrite}} .—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 00:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


:Hm, well, sorry...I really thought they were backing away from the precipice as they did with TDA. ] (]) 01:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
== It's been a goodish 7 years ==


::Ryulong -- do you have any friends on the Power Rangers Wiki, or related wikias? Perhaps you could edit there, that would allow you to retain focus on your zone of interest.<small>] ]</small> 14:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- {{retired}} -->


== Suggestion ==
Actually it's been downhill for me since 2009 but I can't wait to see all the Buddyroids and Tajadors written about then summarily deleted because they're not up to snuff to the project's main standards.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 19:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:It's been great working with you(to some extent). I just wish you understood the way stuff works. If you are truly correct, then somebody else should have your back and revert with you. You don't have to fight the war alone. If you do find yourself fighting a war alone, then maybe either you are wrong, or it just plain isn't a cause worth fighting over.(I think this needs to be an essay!) Unless the edits are obviously straight up vandalism, you don't have the right to revert that many times. ]. Best wishes in your future! <sub style="color:#00008B;">''']'''</sub> <sup>(]·])</sup> 19:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
::It's always been fights other people are involved in but I'm the only to have the balls to do anything about it. I might reconsider after the block is done but this I've contemplated doing this too many times this year and it's time. Plus the outing offsite and the fact no one will do anything about it is distressing enough. I know what will happen without me on the pages I remotely care about and it'll be upsetting but what can I do. No one respects me anywhere because of this garbage.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 19:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Well this was an unfortunate inevitability. In a perfect world, your previous promises to change your attitude, stop abusing rollback and get along with others would have carried weight. Problematically you didn't deliver on said promises. You're right, it has been a downhill spiral for you, but only because you seem to be unable to follow ] and keep yourself from editing while on tilt. If that's the way you will continue to edit, I'm sad to say you should not be here.
:::I'm going to say something now that I've been pondering about in your case for about a month now, hopefully without you feeling like I'm trying to kick you while you're down. Have you ever considered that perhaps the pages you frequent are actually not '''that''' important? That's not to say your contributions are moot, but an encyclopedia should be more focused on things like ], events in history, the world around us, geography, etc. - real information for people to sink their teeth into. By comparison, things like ] and ] seem miniscule at best.
:::And yes, I frequent, follow and contribute to articles of a similar amount of frivolousness, but they're not articles that I'm going to fight to the death for. Saying things like "It's always been fights other people are involved in but I'm the only to have the balls to do anything about it" is a terrible idea. Why fan the flames by clearly picking one side of an argument? These are the kinds of things that certainly will (and have) get you in trouble.
:::If you're truly done here, I wish you luck in your future endeavors. Hopefully when the fire dies down, this will be a learning experience for you to further grow as a person. Take care. <b><span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #A200FF, -4px -4px 15px #00CCFF;">]</span> <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF0000, -4px -4px 15px #FFF600;">] ]</span></b> 03:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
::::It's shit like this that truly shows me that I have no use on this project. One would think that to have someone with some knowledge of Misplaced Pages policies to be able to keep a group of articles that no one else is going to be editing seriously in line with them would be welcomed. Honestly, I don't give a fuck about the NCAA shit. I just saw someone acting against consensus and called him out on it, and he wouldn't take no for an answer, as is evident from the massive diatribes he's left at ]. And with all of the bullshit Japanese kids' television shows, the only thing I do now is make sure that the new episode entry is properly formatted (because no one can apparently figure out how to copy the template I have hidden in the page code) and that the English names are the ones found in reliable sources (also preventing entirely unreliable sources from ever being used in articles), but you would not believe how much ire and hatred I receive because Misplaced Pages uses an L when everyone on 4chan or some other garbage site uses an R. I honestly can't take it anymore. I clearly have lost the respect of everyone on here since the RFAR and I can't keep myself out of trouble so the only way to benefit everyone is to say goodbye to this website and its horribly destructive community. The only benefit that can be gained from this is that ] can use me as a case study as to why their dumb little "Editor of the Week" award doesn't do shit. I have clearly done nothing on this project except piss people off. That is why we now have e-mail blocking and I still can't fucking believe that the guy responsible is allowed to edit now and I'm not.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 05:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::But the reality is that it's '''you''' who refuses to take 'no' for an answer. I remember hearing about this ongoing 'R' vs. 'L' debate you were in and honestly, ''who cares''? It's an extremely moot point and yet these moot points are what you continually find yourself fighting, arguing and edit warring about? ] is not something optional - it's mandatory. You seriously need to take a step back and chill out. You're taking your editing and responsibilities '''far''' to seriously when in reality it's not a huge deal. You are not the only one with knowledge of the content you contribute to and/or Misplaced Pages policies, which all tie into my next point.
:::::From what I've noticed of you these past few months, not only is it you who refuses to take 'no' for an answer, but you continually believe that '''you are right and everyone else is wrong.''' That is not how articles and projects are bettered. They're bettered by a collaborative effort of everyone involved working together. You cannot be the one who's "been fights other people are involved in but I'm the only to have the balls to do anything about it" because that's completely ineffective as far as a 💕 that anyone can edit is concerned.
:::::Your first reaction is usually scorched earth, delete your talk page comments, even blanking the whole thing and replacing it with the "Retired" template only to realize you were being too hasty. You even did that with my last comment and then said "No, I'll reply." Not only does that come off as you being incapable of reacting calmly, but you seemingly cannot stand it when someone else doesn't conform to your standards. Maybe I'm coming off as a little harsh, but these are things I feel I need to say. I've become fairly involved in this saga even from just being on the sidelines.
:::::Misplaced Pages policies became corrupted in your head in the time between you becoming an admin and today. They are not something for you to argue your convictions, to twist them and put spin on them so that you come out on top looking like the one who's right, or for you to argue that you are more right than others referencing a specific guideline "because I was instrumental in drafting it." Do you not see how pointless and frivolous these arguments are? Arguing almost to the death to keep the Japanese title of the PlayStation 4 (which is literally just "Playstation 4" anyway) that doesn't matter to readers on an English Misplaced Pages anyway?
:::::I'm not sure if you're beyond help if you truly believe with all your heart that you are right and everyone else is wrong. If you do, even with literally everyone else telling you with talkback's, discussions, debates, arguments, AN/I's, RfC's and blocks that you are '''wrong''', then that is a very serious problem. <b><span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #A200FF, -4px -4px 15px #00CCFF;">]</span> <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF0000, -4px -4px 15px #FFF600;">] ]</span></b> 16:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
::::::All I do with the L and R shit is follow primary sources, which no one apparently likes because of fansub groups and what they think the translation should be. The PS4 shit was dealt with when I did a fucking Google search. I still don't see how I cannot be considered particularly better at explaining a guideline if I was the one who essentially wrote it. And clearly if I am edit warring with a single other party like what happened with DMB112 or that IP address hopper then it's not just me at fault when I go out of my way to resolve the issue but the other party refuses to start a dialogue.
::::::And I am taking a step back. During the block I've cut my watchlist in half and I'm still considering not returning to editing when the block is lifted, which is honestly the biggest step back that anyone can make. And really, all you're doing is convincing me that that is the best plan to follow through with. You clearly don't give a shit about the work I've done. You've called everything that I work on on this project trivial and unworthy of being in an encyclopedia. So why should I ever bother contributing again if everything I add to this website is jewel encrusted fancruft turds? Or why should I return when someone who I personally had a hand in banning from the site has been allowed to return despite the months of stress he caused me years ago? I can't take this meta nonsense anymore. I wouldn't still be logged in if I didn't despise the Vector skin. Goodbye Antoshi.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 17:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


I think you might benefit from a few days away from Misplaced Pages. You're under stress. ] (]) 22:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The shit on my watchlist has gone so far downhill in my absense and someone is pushing a really stupid opinion on one article. I can't leave just yet. Also, hi one guy on /m/ who thinks using the word "Brave" is racist when a word is literally translaed as "Brave".—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 10:03, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


: Um... I'm going to assume you are unaware... ] (]) 22:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
{{ping|AlienX2009}} would you stop building up the non-main Kamen Rider pages for Gaim already? They're all going to be merged when my block is up because we should not be making pages like these anymore. There is no point in making individual articles for these characters and filling these god damn pages with such useless minutae from the TV show. There is nothing about the character. It's all nonsense about their weapons and belts. Stop now because people have already decided Baron was a shit page.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 20:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
:This doesn't seem particularly helpful ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


== Citations ==
{{ping|KenYokai}} When you see vandalism, '''report it to ]'''. Don't send me an email asking what you should do about it.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 23:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


Should I announce some published scientific articles I worked on while I was in Okinawa?—<span style="color:blue">Ryūlóng</span> (<span style="color:Gold">琉竜</span>) 22:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
{{ping|Rtkat3}} FFS, stop adding more and more information to the villains section of the Megaforce character page. There is no reason that the section on a character who has not even appeared on screen yet is longer than that of the lead character. This is getting ridiculous.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 21:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
:Would this mean GG would know where you work? They've been trying to get other wiki-editors fired from their jobs, so you should probably keep that in mind. ] (]) 23:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


== Troubling decision ==
== Block review (different block) ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
Hi Ryulong. Too bad about your current situation - I hope enjoy a break. We are reviewing old indef IP blocks over at ]. There are three of your blocks in the miscellaneous queue. I wonder if you could review them. They all look good to unblock to me. They are {{userblock|201.36.74.89}}, {{userblock|75.59.243.73}}, and {{userblock|62.114.229.130}}. There are some other lists we'll be looking through, and I know you blocked a lot of open proxies, mostly righteously at the time imo. I expect there'll a few more we'll be looking for your comments on, after we've organised them a bit. Maybe you'd like to follow the discussion or comment or review them yourself. Thanks. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
:These were more than likely blocked at the time due to a disruptive user IP hopping much easier than he should be. Do whatever is necessary without me.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 13:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''When ArbCom fails to take the world into account, it makes the angels cry.'''
::OK, thanks. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 14:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | A really poorly thought out decision. I am sorry it landed this way and the ArbCom will be sorry shortly when they realize what harm they have wrought. -- ] 23:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
|}


== ] closed ==
== Inves ==


This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
{{ping|AlienX2009}} There is no reason to use the Japanese animal names for the Inves because they never show up anyway and it's always the same ones. The only reason we kept them for the Yummy is because of the Medals having Japanese names. Switch them back, please.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 21:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)


{{quotebox|
== JoJo anime official name? ==
1.1)
{{Ivmbox| (i) The community ] are hereby rescinded and are replaced by ], which are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed.


(ii) All sanctions in force when this remedy is enacted are endorsed and will become standard discretionary sanctions governed by the standard procedure from the moment of enactment.
isn't the official name for the 2012-2013 JoJo anime called JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: The Animation? ] (]) 21:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
:No. It's just "JoJo's Bizarre Adventure". The 2014 season will be "JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders", though.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="blue">琉竜</font>) 21:43, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


(iii) Notifications issued under Gamergate general sanctions become ] for twelve months from the date of enactment of this remedy, then expire. The log of notifications will remain on the Gamergate general sanction page.
== Happy 2014 from Cyberpower678 ==


(iv) All existing and past sanctions and restrictions placed under Gamergate general sanctions will be transcribed by the arbitration clerks in the central discretionary sanctions log.
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:gold; background-color:white; font color:gray; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]


(v) Any requests for enforcement that may be open when this remedy is enacted shall proceed, but any remedy that is enacted should be enacted as a discretionary sanction.


(vi) Administrators who have enforced the Gamergate general sanctions are thanked for their work and asked to continue providing administrative assistance enforcing discretionary sanctions and at ].}}
—] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>] — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br />


1.2)
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{tls|New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
{{Ivmbox|1=Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in this case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:


(i) Accounts with a ] may be blocked if they violate the ] or other applicable policy;
</div>—] <sub style="color:olive;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub>] 00:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

(ii) Accounts whose primary purpose is ], violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely;

(iii) There are ] in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;

(iv) The default position for BLPs, particularly for individuals whose noteworthiness is limited to a particular event or topic, is the ] for personal matters;

(v) Editors who spread or further publicize existing ] may be blocked;

(vi) Administrators may act on clear ] with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;

(vii) Discretionary sanctions permit full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has ] of sanctions for the topic – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

The Arbitration Committee thanks those administrators who have been helping to enforce the community general sanctions, and thanks, once again, in advance those who help enforce the remedies adopted in this case.}}

2.1) Any editor subject to a topic-ban in this decision is indefinitely prohibited from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, (a) Gamergate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

4.1) {{userlinks|NorthBySouthBaranof}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

5.1) {{userlinks|Ryulong}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

5.3) {{userlinks|Ryulong}} is indefinitely banned from the English Language Misplaced Pages. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

6.2) {{userlinks|TaraInDC}} is admonished for treating Misplaced Pages as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

7.2) {{userlinks|Tarc}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

7.3) {{userlinks|Tarc}} is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion of the Arbitration Committee.

8.2) {{userlinks|The Devil's Advocate}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

8.3) Subject to ], {{userlinks|The Devil's Advocate}} is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 48-hour period. This applies for all pages on the English Misplaced Pages, except The Devil's Advocate's own user space. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.4) Subject to ], {{userlinks|The Devil's Advocate}} is indefinitely prohibited from editing any administrative or conduct noticeboard (including, not not limited to; AN, AN/I, AN/EW, and AE), except for threads regarding situations that he was directly involved in when they were started. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.5) {{userlinks|The Devil's Advocate}} is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion of the Arbitration Committee. Further, the committee strongly suggests that The Devil's Advocate refrains from editing contentious topic areas in the future.

9) {{userlinks|TheRedPenOfDoom}} is admonished for treating Misplaced Pages as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

10.1) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing {{User|Tutelary}} from editing under the ]. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. {{userlinks|Tutelary}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

12) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic bans preventing {{User|ArmyLine}}, {{User|DungeonSiegeAddict510}}, and {{User|Xander756}} from editing under the ]. The topic bans for these three editors are converted to indefinite restrictions per the ].

13) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing {{User|Titanium Dragon}} from editing under ]. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. Titanium Dragon is indefinitely restricted per the ].

14.1) {{userlinks|Loganmac}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

15) {{userlinks|Willhesucceed}} is indefinitely restricted per the ].

18) The Arbitration Committee urges that knowledgeable and non-conflicted users not previously involved in editing GamerGate-related articles, especially GamerGate-related biographies of living people, should carefully review them for adherence to Misplaced Pages policies and address any perceived or discovered deficiencies. This is not a finding that the articles are or are not satisfactory in their present form, but an urging that independent members of the community examine the matter in light of the case.
}}

For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 00:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Callanecc@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Callanecc/sandbox&oldid=644628920 -->

== Sanctions ==

Ryulong, I know I've been plenty critical of your editing, but this is much more than I think is warranted. Take care. ] (]) 05:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
*My condolences to you Ryulong. You have definitely been a valuable contributor. I'll try to hold the fort down on Pokemon Episodes during your absence. Take care.—<sup>]</sup><small><sub style="margin-left:-13.5ex;color:#FF8C00;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Limited Access</sub></small> 05:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
We await your return. Be strong. ] (]) 07:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

*Seconding Drmies, this is very harsh and I'm sorry. Hope to see you again in a year. ] (]) 16:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
*Be strong, find joy in the good things of life outside the encyclopedia anyone can edit. Hope to see you back. ] (]) 19:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
*I would have expected a topic ban, not a site ban. That said, you make good edits elsewhere, and when the time comes I'll endorse your appeal. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-size:3">]</span><sup>]</sup> 10:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

If you want me to remove this, let me know.--] (]) 23:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
:Just saying that I got the ping, but someone (^) apparently got to it before me. Cheers ​—] (])​ 02:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
*Ryulong! How are things. I hear you're suspected of socking--that's not good. I hope those suspicions are wrong, since they'll hurt you in an eventual appeal, which I and I'm sure others hope you will file at some point. Take care. ] (]) 17:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 10:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Old article that fails Google test.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] ] ] 15:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#List of Kamen Rider Ryuki charcters}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]] 22:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:46, 3 November 2024

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link.
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely.
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page.
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words.
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there.
My local time: December 2024 24 Tuesday 4:32 pm EST
Archives
  1. 2—6/06
  2. 7/06
  3. 8/06
  4. 9/06
  5. 10/06
  6. 11/06
  7. 12/06
  8. 1/07
  9. 2/07
  10. 3/07
  11. 4/07
  12. 5/07
  13. 6/07
  14. 7/07
  15. 8/07
  16. 9/07
  17. 10/07
  18. 11/07
  19. 12/07
  20. 1/08
  21. 2/08
  22. 3/08
  23. 4/08
  24. 5/08
  25. 6/08
  26. 7/08
  27. 8/08
  28. 9/08
  29. 10/08
  30. 11/08
  31. 12/08
  32. 1/09
  33. 2/09
  34. 3/09
  35. 4/09
  36. 5/09
  37. 6/09
  38. 7/09
  39. 8/09
  40. 9/09
  41. 10/09
  42. 11/09
  43. 12/09
  44. 1/10
  45. 2/10
  46. 3/10
  47. 4/10
  48. 5/10
  49. 6/10
  50. 7/10
  51. 8/10
  52. 9/10
  53. 10/10
  54. 11/10
  55. 12/10
  56. 1/11
  57. 2/11
  58. 3/11
  59. 4/11
  60. 5/11
  61. 6/11
  62. 7/11
  63. 8/11
  64. 9/11
  65. 10/11
  66. 11/11
  67. 12/11
  68. 1/12
  69. 2/12
  70. 3/12
  71. 4/12
  72. 5/12
  73. 6/12
  74. 7/12
  75. 8/12
  76. 9/12
  77. 10/12
  78. 11/12
  79. 12/12
  80. 1/13
  81. 2/13
  82. 3/13
  83. 4/13
  84. 5/13
  85. 6/13
  86. 7/13
  87. 8/13
  88. 9/13
  89. 10/13
  90. 11/13
  91. 12/13
  92. 1/14
  93. 2/14
  94. 3/14
  95. 4/14
  96. 5/14
  97. 6/14
  98. 7/14
  99. 8/14
  100. 9/14
  101. 10/14
  102. 11/14
  103. 12/14
  104. 1/15

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng



e's not dead, e's just restin'

Though the ink is not yet 100% dry, reports of your demise may have been premature. Guerillero moved to oppose, which based on T. Canen's conditional support, movies his vote to oppose as well. Or something. Tarc (talk) 20:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I already nuked my watch list. Great.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Do you know how freeing a good watch list nuke is? I do. Hipocrite (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Yea I did that once too, a ton of crap that I long ago abandoned, every album art cover I uploaded, no need to watch all that anymore. Start from scratch...and leave every WP:* 'tard board off...maybe narrow the focus a little, it'll be fun. Tarc (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
A lot of my watchlist was to deal with ongoing long term vandalism.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Loganmac is disrupting Tokumei Sentai Go-Busters now.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Tarc and Hipocrite: —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Yea, I'm out the door for dinner date but I left a message for HJ Mitchell, who is a fair admin and is familiar with Logan. IMO this is about as clear cut a case of baiting/stalking as one can get. Tarc (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
And they're still quibbling so hopefully we didn't get your hopes up too much. It seems it'll depend on Canens himself providing a clarifying remark. Tarc (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
And this is why you should keep your watchlist nuked for a bit (assuming that T Canens meant what I think he meant, and you avoid the ban). Quit thinking about the quality of the encyclopaedia for a bit and focus on your peace of mind. Guettarda (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I've only got my regular pages on there now.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Well it was a nice few hours considering all of the bullshit going on behind the scenes on the mailing list.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry that you died again. My email is enabled, so if you need something specific changed on a specific article, contact me and I'll review the merits on my own per WP:BAN and consider making the edit myself based on my independent and fully formed review of your proposals and stuff. Hipocrite (talk) 22:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Just watch Tokumei Sentai Go-Busters and its related pages and Kamen Rider OOO (character) (maybe some related pages). The official trademark trumps a single frame from the TV show and a stupid fandom insistence otherwise.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I was commenting more on a go-forward-for-a-year basis. Hipocrite (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Those are really the only pages I'm worried about. Also maybe that BuickCenturyDriver/Don't Feed the Zords will return to troll List of Power Rangers Dino Charge episodes. ALl I do is update a bunch of episode lists because I put in too much of a complex formatting for anyone to possibly use on their own.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Roger. Provide a list and I will guarantee coverage. I can do the formatting. Post the list to HipocriteRLWatcher so I can segregate the watchlists. Thanks Hipocrite (talk) 22:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Salvidrim hit the wrong button on me so I can't do that atm.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
@Hipocrite: what do you want me to do again.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Make a page with your watchlist that I can watch to figure out what I'm supposed to do while you're gone. Hipocrite (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
The formatting I have on List of Kamen Rider Drive episodes is unnecessarily complex though.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Are you... challenging me? Hipocrite (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Here's the thing. I update List of Ressha Sentai ToQger episodes, List of Kamen Rider Drive episodes, List of Yo-Kai Watch episodes, List of Garo: The Animation episodes, and JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders on a weekly basis. This involves translating the episode titles, watching the little "next time on..." clip, translating the episode summary for a one sentence summary for Misplaced Pages, check who the writer is for the episode, and then make sure that people don't fuck up the formatting after I've made a new entry. I've already filled out the final episodes of ToQger and started up List of Shuriken Sentai Ninninger episodes for good measure, even though the titles are tentative and I don't like that color I picked out. Do you seriously want to pick up the slack in these multiple pages that requires knowing something about the plot and deciphering Google Translate's jumbled up garbage because the reading comprehension I gained in Japanese is somewhat waning?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Can I do that if my Japanese is limited to, basically the names of the attacks and defenses that a student of Aikido who has never traveled west of Hawaii would know? Wait, don't answer that, it's just going to depress both of us. Hipocrite (talk) 22:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Wait, you mean episode guides don't magically appear on their own? :) Guettarda (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I'd suggest some fanblogs to use for double checking, but I learned fairly recently that they're just copying what I had been writing for all of the entries. They're going to be totally fucked over after this case. Take that JEFusion and Orends Range.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
I forgot I also update JoJolion monthly.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Best wishes to another good contributor that arbcom has dismissed. I hope to see you in the future. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
It's clear no one wants me around simply because I raised the issue that their 1RR proposal was already causing me grief.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Having seen multiple socks stalk you I understand completely why it's unworkable...it sets you up to be never stop harrassed.Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Based on my sources from back when I got ArbCommed, you were likely the casualty of one arb threatening to blow the whole place up if they didn't get what they wanted. I don't know who, because I took a long wikipedia break, and have no idea who the majority of the committee are now. I can't believe I delayed clearing my name from the horrendous ClimateChange ban for GamerGate! Hipocrite (talk) 22:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
It's fairly obvious that it was either a full site ban or a 1RR ban was going to pass. But maybe this is a blessing in disguise because I was so fucking tired of updating those episode lists.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Ryulong, I can't comment on any ongoing arbcom case or the like. However, you can find your watchlist key in preferences -> watchlist -> Near the bottom and email an individual it. They will then be able to view your watchlist. What I've not figured out is where you enter the darned thing. Tutelary (talk) 22:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Salvidrim!: You hit the wrong button.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Oops! ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  22:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I wanted to make White Light (Superfly song) but fuck it.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

24 hours! Let's go out with my first FA. Hipocrite (talk) 22:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
White (Superfly album) probably does need to be created, and surely will be at some point. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  22:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This is all I have on either at the moment. Haven't checked BARKS.jp to see if they have anything different.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Yeah this is all Barks has.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
At least someone wrote Shine Like a Billion Suns without me.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Hipocrite and Hell in a Bucket: I emailed both of you my watchlist token.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I found out where you enter it at. Tutelary (talk) 22:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

List of Ressha Sentai ToQger episodes (soon to be List of Shuriken Sentai Ninninger episodes) and List of Kamen Rider Drive episodes updates every Saturday (EST). The first updates at 6 pm EST and the other 6:30 pm EST (jumping forward with the change to EDT). The Ninninger page might need to have its reference links updated because I just copied the old entry on another page and assumed that the link formatting would be exactly the same. Someone's going to have to start a List of Shuriken Sentai Ninninger characters page at some point.

List of Garo: The Animation episodes and JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders update every Friday. I'm fairly certain that these update around noon but I just get to them when I remember that the episode aired. Garo has hidden templates with instructions and such in them (check the writer, etc.) and Stardust Crusaders has all of the episodes preplanned but no titles. I think List of Yo-Kai Watch episodes updates on this day too. I can't remember.

A new issue of Ultra Jump comes out every month on the 19th so unless it's taking a break for the month which happens every so often JoJolion is updated this often too. I use this website to pull the new UJ chapter titles from and if a new volume comes out I just try my best to search for blogs posting them and the volume's title.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I used to also update List of Yo-Kai Watch characters with cast member updates but I stopped caring a while back.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Parasyte updates Wednesdays. I check this TV schedule for the next week's episode.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Hipocrite: There it is again.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 00:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hm, well, sorry...I really thought they were backing away from the precipice as they did with TDA. Tarc (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Ryulong -- do you have any friends on the Power Rangers Wiki, or related wikias? Perhaps you could edit there, that would allow you to retain focus on your zone of interest.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 14:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Suggestion

I think you might benefit from a few days away from Misplaced Pages. You're under stress. DS (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Um... I'm going to assume you are unaware... Hipocrite (talk) 22:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
This doesn't seem particularly helpful EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Citations

Should I announce some published scientific articles I worked on while I was in Okinawa?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 22:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Would this mean GG would know where you work? They've been trying to get other wiki-editors fired from their jobs, so you should probably keep that in mind. Bosstopher (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Troubling decision

When ArbCom fails to take the world into account, it makes the angels cry.
A really poorly thought out decision. I am sorry it landed this way and the ArbCom will be sorry shortly when they realize what harm they have wrought. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate closed

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1.1)

(i) The community Gamergate general sanctions are hereby rescinded and are replaced by standard discretionary sanctions, which are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed.

(ii) All sanctions in force when this remedy is enacted are endorsed and will become standard discretionary sanctions governed by the standard procedure from the moment of enactment.

(iii) Notifications issued under Gamergate general sanctions become alerts for twelve months from the date of enactment of this remedy, then expire. The log of notifications will remain on the Gamergate general sanction page.

(iv) All existing and past sanctions and restrictions placed under Gamergate general sanctions will be transcribed by the arbitration clerks in the central discretionary sanctions log.

(v) Any requests for enforcement that may be open when this remedy is enacted shall proceed, but any remedy that is enacted should be enacted as a discretionary sanction.

(vi) Administrators who have enforced the Gamergate general sanctions are thanked for their work and asked to continue providing administrative assistance enforcing discretionary sanctions and at Arbitration enforcement.

1.2)

Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in this case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:

(i) Accounts with a clear shared agenda may be blocked if they violate the sockpuppetry policy or other applicable policy;

(ii) Accounts whose primary purpose is disruption, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely;

(iii) There are special provisions in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;

(iv) The default position for BLPs, particularly for individuals whose noteworthiness is limited to a particular event or topic, is the presumption of privacy for personal matters;

(v) Editors who spread or further publicize existing BLP violations may be blocked;

(vi) Administrators may act on clear BLP violations with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;

(vii) Discretionary sanctions permit full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has become aware of sanctions for the topic – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

The Arbitration Committee thanks those administrators who have been helping to enforce the community general sanctions, and thanks, once again, in advance those who help enforce the remedies adopted in this case.

2.1) Any editor subject to a topic-ban in this decision is indefinitely prohibited from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, (a) Gamergate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

4.1) NorthBySouthBaranof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

5.1) Ryulong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

5.3) Ryulong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely banned from the English Language Misplaced Pages. They may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.

6.2) TaraInDC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished for treating Misplaced Pages as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

7.2) Tarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

7.3) Tarc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion of the Arbitration Committee.

8.2) The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

8.3) Subject to the usual exceptions, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 48-hour period. This applies for all pages on the English Misplaced Pages, except The Devil's Advocate's own user space. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.4) Subject to the usual exceptions, The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely prohibited from editing any administrative or conduct noticeboard (including, not not limited to; AN, AN/I, AN/EW, and AE), except for threads regarding situations that he was directly involved in when they were started. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee only after 12 months have elapsed from the closing of this case.

8.5) The Devil's Advocate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is strongly warned that should future misconduct occur in any topic area, he may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion of the Arbitration Committee. Further, the committee strongly suggests that The Devil's Advocate refrains from editing contentious topic areas in the future.

9) TheRedPenOfDoom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished for treating Misplaced Pages as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.

10.1) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing Tutelary (talk · contribs) from editing under the Gamergate general sanctions. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. Tutelary (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

12) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic bans preventing ArmyLine (talk · contribs), DungeonSiegeAddict510 (talk · contribs), and Xander756 (talk · contribs) from editing under the Gamergate general sanctions. The topic bans for these three editors are converted to indefinite restrictions per the standard topic ban.

13) The Arbitration Committee endorses the community-imposed topic ban preventing Titanium Dragon (talk · contribs) from editing under BLP enforcement. This ban is converted to an Arbitration Committee-imposed ban. Titanium Dragon is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

14.1) Loganmac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

15) Willhesucceed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely restricted per the standard topic ban.

18) The Arbitration Committee urges that knowledgeable and non-conflicted users not previously involved in editing GamerGate-related articles, especially GamerGate-related biographies of living people, should carefully review them for adherence to Misplaced Pages policies and address any perceived or discovered deficiencies. This is not a finding that the articles are or are not satisfactory in their present form, but an urging that independent members of the community examine the matter in light of the case.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 00:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Sanctions

Ryulong, I know I've been plenty critical of your editing, but this is much more than I think is warranted. Take care. Drmies (talk) 05:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

  • My condolences to you Ryulong. You have definitely been a valuable contributor. I'll try to hold the fort down on Pokemon Episodes during your absence. Take care.—Chat:Limited Access 05:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

We await your return. Be strong. GoodDay (talk) 07:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

If you want me to remove this, let me know.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Just saying that I got the ping, but someone (^) apparently got to it before me. Cheers ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:34, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Ryulong! How are things. I hear you're suspected of socking--that's not good. I hope those suspicions are wrong, since they'll hurt you in an eventual appeal, which I and I'm sure others hope you will file at some point. Take care. Drmies (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryo Ueno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryo Ueno is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ryo Ueno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shirt58 (talk) 10:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camino (band)

Notice

The article Camino (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old article that fails Google test.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 15:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

"List of Kamen Rider Ryuki charcters" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of Kamen Rider Ryuki charcters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3 § List of Kamen Rider Ryuki charcters until a consensus is reached. Regards, SONIC678 22:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)