Revision as of 09:42, 16 June 2006 edit62.171.194.5 (talk) →Against other major currencies← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:51, 12 January 2025 edit undoDasomm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,012 edits →EU members not using the euro | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Currency of the European Union}} | |||
:<span class="dablink">''For other uses, see ] or ].''</span> | |||
{{hatnote group| | |||
{{Life in the European Union}} | |||
{{about|the currency}} | |||
{{redirect|EUR}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Good article}} | |||
{{Use British English|date=March 2013}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2021}} | |||
{{Infobox currency | |||
| name = Euro | |||
| local_name = <small>{{nobold|1=see also ]}}</small> | |||
| image_1 = Euro banknotes, Europa series.png | |||
| image_width_1 = 175px | |||
| image_title_1 = ] | |||
| image_2 = Reverso 1 euro.jpg | |||
| image_width_2 = 125px | |||
| image_title_2 = 1 euro coin | |||
| iso_code = EUR | |||
| subunit_name_1 = ] | |||
| unit = euro | |||
| plural = Varies, see ] | |||
| symbol = ] | |||
| symbol_subunit_1 = c | |||
| nickname = The single currency{{efn|1=Official documents and legislation refer to the euro as "the single currency".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997R1103:EN:HTML |title=Council Regulation (EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June 1997 on certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro |access-date=1 April 2009 |date=19 June 1997 |work=Official Journal L 162, 19 June 1997 P. 0001 – 0003 |publisher=European Communities}}</ref>}} | |||
| frequently_used_banknotes = ], ], ], ], ], ]<ref name="Circulation_report">{{cite web |url=http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/reports.do?node=1000004111 |title=ECB Statistical Data Warehouse, Reports>ECB/Eurosystem policy>Banknotes and coins statistics>1.Euro banknotes>1.1 Quantities |publisher=European Central Bank}}</ref> | |||
| rarely_used_banknotes = ]<ref name="Circulation_report"/> | |||
| frequently_used_coins = ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| rarely_used_coins = ], ] (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Slovakia<ref>{{cite web|first1=Alistair|last1=Walsh|access-date=2019-11-04|title=Italy to stop producing 1- and 2-cent coins |url=https://www.dw.com/en/italy-to-stop-producing-1-and-2-cent-coins/a-39020206|date=29 May 2017|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|first1=|last1=|access-date=17 December 2023|title=Po 1. júli 2022 budú končiť na Slovensku jedno a dvojcentové mince |url=https://www.bystricoviny.sk/spravy/po-1-juli-2022-budu-koncit-na-slovensku-jedno-a-dvojcentove-mince/|date=29 May 2017|website=bystricoviny.sk|language=sk}}</ref>) | |||
| subunit_ratio_1 = {{frac|100}} | |||
| subunit_inline_note_1 = (]) | |||
| plural_subunit_1 = (]) | |||
| banknote_article = euro banknotes | |||
| coin_article = euro coins | |||
| using_countries = primary: ] (20),<br/>also: ] | |||
| date_of_introduction = {{start date and age|1999|1|1|df=y}} | |||
| replaced_currency = ] | |||
| issuing_authority = ] | |||
| issuing_authority_website = {{URL|https://www.ecb.europa.eu}} | |||
| printer = see {{section link|Euro|Banknote printing|nopage=y}} | |||
| mint = ] | |||
| inflation_rate = 2.2% (November 2024)<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/macroeconomic_and_sectoral/hicp/html/index.en.html | title=Inflation and consumer prices}}</ref> | |||
| pegged_by = see {{section link||Pegged currencies}} | |||
| inflation_source_date = | |||
| inflation_method = ] | |||
}} | |||
] | |||
The '''euro''' (]: '''€'''; ]: '''EUR''') is the official ] of the ] and single currency for over 300 million ]s in the following twelve European Union member states: | |||
{{legend|#0076BA|Euro Zone inflation year/year}} | |||
], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], the ], ] and ]; collectively also known as the ]. Due to bilateral agreements it is the official currency of the following non-member states: ], ], and ]. It is the ''de facto'' currency of ], ] and ]. | |||
{{legend-line|#FFD932 solid 3px|M3 money supply increases}} | |||
{{legend-line|#EE220C solid 3px|Marginal Lending Facility}} | |||
{{legend-line|#970E53 solid 3px|Main Refinancing Operations}} | |||
{{legend-line|#F27200 solid 3px|Deposit Facility Rate}} | |||
{{legend-line|#FF95CA solid 3px|]}} | |||
]] | |||
The '''euro''' (]: ''']'''; ]: '''EUR''') is the official ] of 20 of the {{EUnum}} ] of the ]. This group of states is officially known as the euro area or, more commonly, the ]. The euro is divided into 100 ].<ref name="EC Euro Area">{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/index_en.htm |title=The euro |access-date=2 January 2019 |work=] website}}</ref><ref name="EC Euro1 euro cent coin Area 2">{{cite web |access-date=2019-01-02 |title=What is the euro area? |url=https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/euro-area/what-euro-area_en |website=European Commission website}}</ref> | |||
The euro was introduced to world financial markets as an ] currency in 1999 and launched as physical ]s and ]s in 2002. All EU member states are eligible to join if they comply with certain monetary requirements, and eventual use of the euro is mandatory for all new EU members. The euro is to be introduced in ] on ], ], replacing the ]. | |||
The currency is also used officially by the ], by ] that are not EU members,<ref name="EC Euro1 euro cent coin Area 2" /> the ] of ], as well as unilaterally by ] and ]. Outside Europe, a number of ] also use the euro as their currency. Additionally, over 200 million people worldwide use ]. | |||
The euro is managed and administered by the ]-based ] (ECB) and the ] (ESCB) (composed of the ]s of its member states). As an independent ], the ECB has sole authority to set ]. The ESCB participates in the printing, minting and distribution of ] and ] in all member states, and the operation of the Eurozone payment systems. | |||
The euro is the second-largest ] as well as the second-most traded currency in the world after the ].<ref>{{cite web|title=IMF Data – Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserve – At a Glance|publisher=International Monetary Fund|url=http://data.imf.org/?sk=E6A5F467-C14B-4AA8-9F6D-5A09EC4E62A4|date=23 December 2022|access-date=11 January 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Foreign exchange turnover in April 2013: preliminary global results |url=http://www.bis.org/publ/rpfx13fx.pdf |publisher=Bank for International Settlements |access-date=7 February 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bis.org/publ/rpfxf07t.pdf |title=Triennial Central Bank Survey 2007 |publisher=BIS |date=19 December 2007 |access-date=25 July 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14350/1/MPRA_paper_14350.pdf |last1=Aristovnik |first1=Aleksander |last2=Čeč |first2=Tanja |title=Compositional Analysis of Foreign Currency Reserves in the 1999–2007 Period. The Euro vs. The Dollar As Leading Reserve Currency|publisher=Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 14350 |date=30 March 2010 |access-date=27 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Boesler |first=Matthew |title=There Are Only Two Real Threats to the US Dollar's Status As The International Reserve Currency |url=http://www.businessinsider.com/dollar-as-international-reserve-currency-2013-11 |access-date=8 December 2013 |newspaper=Business Insider |date=11 November 2013}}</ref> {{As of|2019|12|post=,}} with more than €1.3 trillion in circulation, the euro has one of the highest combined values of banknotes and coins in circulation in the world.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/reports.do?node=1000004112 |title=1.2 Euro banknotes, values |access-date=23 January 2020 |publisher=European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse|date=14 January 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/reports.do?node=1000004114|title=2.2 Euro coins, values|access-date=23 January 2020 |publisher=European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse|date=14 January 2020}}</ref> | |||
==Characteristics of the euro== | |||
===Coins and banknotes=== | |||
] | |||
] | |||
The name ''euro'' was officially adopted on 16 December 1995 in ].<ref name="madrid1995">{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/mad1_en.htm |title=Madrid European Council (12/95): Conclusions |publisher=European Parliament |access-date=14 February 2009}}</ref> The euro was introduced to world financial markets as an ] on 1 January 1999, replacing the former ] (ECU) at a ratio of 1:1 (US$1.1743 at the time). Physical euro coins and banknotes entered into circulation on 1 January 2002, making it the day-to-day operating currency of its original members, and by March 2002 it had completely replaced the former currencies.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.ecb.int/euro/changeover/2002/html/index.en.html| title = Initial changeover (2002)| publisher=European Central Bank| access-date =5 March 2011}}</ref> | |||
:''Main articles: ], ]''. | |||
Between December 1999 and December 2002, the euro traded below the US dollar, but has since traded near parity with or above the US dollar, peaking at US$1.60 on 18 July 2008 and since then returning near to its original issue rate. On 13 July 2022, the two currencies hit parity for the first time in nearly two decades due in part to the ].<ref name="NYTimes-2022">{{Cite news |date=2022-07-12 |title=Euro Falls Near Parity With Dollar, a Threshold Watched Closely by Investors |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/12/business/euro-dollar-parity.html |access-date=2022-07-13 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Then, in September 2022, the US dollar again had a face value higher than the Euro, at around US dollar 0.95 per euro.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-09-23 |title=Euro fällt zum US-Dollar auf 20-Jahrestief |url=https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/euro-faellt-zum-us-dollar-auf-20-jahrestief-a-327dab06-b9ed-40bf-9b48-502c9dde1607 |access-date=2024-07-10 |work=Der Spiegel |language=de |issn=2195-1349}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Euro (EUR) To US Dollar (USD) Exchange Rate History for 2022 |url=https://www.exchange-rates.org/exchange-rate-history/eur-usd-2022 |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=www.exchange-rates.org |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The euro is divided into 100 ''']'''. In each country but Greece, which uses ''λεπτό'' and ''λεπτά'' on its coins, the form "cent" is officially required to be used in legislation in both the singular and in the plural, though in common usage it is common to translate these into the local language, for example ''cents'' in ] and ''centesimo-centesimi'' in ]. (For more information on language and the euro, see ].) | |||
==Characteristics== | |||
All euro coins (including the ]) have a '''common side''' showing the denomination (value) with the EU-countries in the background and a '''national side''' showing an image specifically chosen by the country that issued the coin; the ] often have a picture of their reigning monarch, while other countries usually have their national symbols. Most member states use only one or up to three different symbols, whereas Austria, Greece, Italy and San Marino have choosen individual depictions for every coin, so you can tell the value without looking at the denomination. All coins can be used in all member states: for example, a euro coin bearing the image of the ] is legal tender not only in Spain, but also in all other member states where the euro is in use. There are €2 (silver-colored enclosure with gold-colored centerpiece), €1 (gold-colored enclosure with silver-colored centerpiece), 50c (gold-colored), 20c (gold-colored), 10c (gold-colored), 5c (copper-colored), 2c (copper-colored) and 1c (copper-colored) coins, though the latter two are not generally used in Finland or the Netherlands (but are still ]). | |||
===Administration=== | |||
{{Main|European Central Bank|Maastricht Treaty|Eurogroup}} | |||
The euro is managed and administered by the ] and the ], composed of the ]s of the eurozone countries. As an independent central bank, the ECB has sole authority to set ]. The Eurosystem participates in the printing, minting and distribution of ] and ] in all member states, and the operation of the eurozone payment systems. | |||
All euro banknotes have a '''common design''' for each denomination on both sides. Notes are issued in the following values: €500, €200, €100, €50, €20, €10, €5. Some of the higher denominations are not issued in a few countries, though again, are legal tender. | |||
The 1992 ] obliges most EU member states to adopt the euro upon meeting certain monetary and budgetary ], although not all participating states have done so. ] has negotiated exemptions,<ref>{{cite web|title=The Euro |publisher=European Commission|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/index_en.htm |access-date=29 January 2009}}</ref> while Sweden (which joined the EU in 1995, after the Maastricht Treaty was signed) turned down the euro in a ], and has circumvented the obligation to adopt the euro by not meeting the monetary and budgetary requirements. All nations that have joined the EU since 1993 have pledged to adopt the euro in due course. The Maastricht Treaty was amended by the 2001 ],<ref>{{cite web |last1=Nice |first1=Treaty of |title=Treaty of Nice |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-nice |website=About Parliament |publisher= European Parliament |access-date=7 May 2021}}</ref> which closed the gaps and loopholes in the Maastricht and Rome Treaties. | |||
Both euro coins and banknotes are designed from the start in consultation with organizations representing people suffering from ] or other ]. Both have been designed to facilitate their use by people who may not be able to see the currency very well (or at all). Cues to aid in identification include gross differences in appearance (colour, size) for banknotes and coins, and tactile cues such as thickness and edge decoration for coins in particular. Although there have been other currencies predating the euro that were specifically designed in similar ways (different sizes, colours, and ridges) to aid the visually impaired, the introduction of the euro constitutes the first time that authorities have consulted associations representing the blind before and not after the event. For details, see the ] and ] articles. | |||
<!-- the design of the banknotes is documented in the banknotes article --> | |||
==Countries that use the euro== | |||
The ECB has set up a ] for large euro transactions (). | |||
{{Further|Euro#Direct and indirect usage}} | |||
All intra-] transfers shall cost the same as a domestic one. This is true for retail payments, although several ECB payment methods can be used. Credit card charging and ATM withdrawals within the Eurozone are also charged as if they were domestic. The ECB hasn't standardized paper based payment orders, such as cheques; these are still domestic-based. | |||
=== |
===Eurozone members=== | ||
{{main| |
{{main|Eurozone}} | ||
The 20 participating members are<br /> | |||
] Yellow on a PMS Reflex Blue background]] | |||
{{div col|colwidth=10em}} | |||
A special ] (€) was designed, after a public survey had narrowed the original ten proposals down to just two. The European Commission then chose the final design. The eventual winner was a design allegedly created by a team of four experts who have not, however, been officially named. The official story of the design history of the euro symbol is by ], a former chief graphic designer for the ], who claims to have created it as a generic symbol of Europe. | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Austria}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Belgium}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Croatia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Cyprus}}{{efn|], where the government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control, uses the ].}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Estonia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Finland}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|France}}{{efn|Including outermost regions of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Germany}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Greece}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Republic of Ireland|Ireland}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Italy}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Latvia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Lithuania}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Luxembourg}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Malta}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Netherlands}}{{efn|Only the European part of the country is part of the European Union and uses the euro. The ] introduced the ] in 2011 following the dissolution of the ] (which used the ]). ], ] and ] have their own currencies, which are pegged to the dollar.}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Portugal}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Slovakia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Slovenia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Spain}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
===]=== | |||
The symbol is (according to the ]) "a combination of the Greek ], as a sign of the weight of European civilization; an E for Europe; and the parallel lines crossing through standing for the stability of the euro". | |||
{{div col|colwidth=40em}} | |||
''']:''' | |||
{{colbegin|colwidth=15em}} | |||
*{{Flagcountry|France}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|French Guiana}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Guadeloupe}} | |||
**{{flagicon image|Flag-of-Martinique.svg|size=23px}} ] | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Saint Martin}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Mayotte}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Réunion}} | |||
*{{Flagcountry|Portugal}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Azores}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Madeira}} | |||
*{{Flagcountry|Spain}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Canary Islands}} | |||
{{colend}} | |||
''']:''' | |||
The European Commission also specified a euro logo with exact proportions and foreground/background colour tones . Although some font designers simply copied the exact shape of this logo as the euro sign in their fonts, most designed their own variants, often based upon the capital letter C in the respective font. The illustration at the top of this section shows the official euro logo. | |||
*{{Flagcountry|France}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|French Southern and Antarctic Lands}} | |||
**{{flagicon|Saint Barthélemy|local}} ] | |||
**{{flagicon|Saint Pierre and Miquelon|local}} ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1999:030:0029:0030:EN:PDF |title=By agreement of the EU Council |access-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
''']:''' | |||
No "official" recommendation is made with regard to the use of a ], and sums are often expressed as decimals of the euro (for example €0.05 or even €–.05 rather than 5c). As a result the abbreviations differ between Eurozone members. The most used abbreviation is "c", but other abbreviations also exist, like "ct" (among others: Germany), snt (Finland), the capital letter ''lambda'' (Λ) (Greece). In Ireland, "c" is used, but the American-style "¢" is occasionally seen. | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Finland}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Åland}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Greece}} | |||
**{{Flagicon image|Flag of the Greek Orthodox Church.svg}} ] | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Spain}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Ceuta}} | |||
**{{Flagcountry|Melilla}} | |||
===Other users=== | |||
Placement of the symbol varies from nation to nation. While the official recommendation is to place it before the number, people in many countries have kept the placement of their former currencies.{{citation needed}} | |||
'''Microstates with a monetary agreement:''' | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Andorra}}<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:369:0001:0013:EN:PDF |title=Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra |date=17 December 2011 |access-date=2012-09-08 |journal=] |archive-date=10 May 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130510123910/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:369:0001:0013:EN:PDF |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Monaco}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:142:0059:0073:EN:PDF |title=By monetary agreement between France (acting for the EC) and Monaco |access-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|San Marino}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:209:0001:0004:EN:PDF |title=By monetary agreement between Italy (acting for the EC) and San Marino |access-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Vatican City}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:299:0001:0004:EN:PDF |title=By monetary agreement between Italy (acting for the EC) and Vatican City |access-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
''']:''' | |||
==Economic and Monetary Union== | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
===History (1990-2002)=== | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Akrotiri and Dhekelia}}<ref>{{cite news |last=Theodoulou |first=Michael |date=27 December 2007 |url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3097521.ece |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110510204604/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3097521.ece |title=Euro reaches field that is for ever England |work=The Times |access-date= 4 January 2008 |archive-date=10 May 2011}}</ref> | |||
:''Main article: ]. For earlier monetary history in Europe, see: ]. | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
The euro was established by the provisions in the 1992 ] ] that was used to establish an ]. In order to participate in the new currency, member states had to meet ] such as a ] of less than three per cent of ], a debt ratio of less than sixty per cent of GDP, combined with low ] and ] rates close to the EU average. | |||
'''Unilateral adopters:''' | |||
Economist ] is sometimes referred to as the father of the euro. Other economists that helped include ], ], ] and ]. (For macro-economic theory, see ].) | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Kosovo}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm |title=By UNMIK administration direction 1999/2 |publisher=Unmikonline.org |access-date=30 May 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110607234444/http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm |archive-date=7 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Montenegro}}{{efn|See ].}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
==EU members not using the euro == | |||
{| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="border: 1px solid #000000; float: right; margin: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 5px;" | |||
{{main|Enlargement of the eurozone}} | |||
|- style="background-color: #999999;" | |||
{{Anchor|EUnoEZ}} | |||
! Currency | |||
! Abbr. | |||
! Rate | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} Austrian ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (ATS) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 13.7603 | |||
|- style="background-color: #CCCCCC;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Belgium}} Belgian ] | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (BEF) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 40.3399 | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} Dutch ] | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (NLG) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 2.20371 | |||
|- style="background-color: #CCCCCC;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Finland}} Finnish ] | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (FIM) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 5.94573 | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} French ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (FRF) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 6.55957 | |||
|- style="background-color: #CCCCCC;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Germany}} German ] | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (DEM) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 1.95583 | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Ireland}} Irish ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (IEP) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 0.787564 | |||
|- style="background-color: #CCCCCC;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Italy}} Italian ] | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (ITL) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 1936.27 | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Luxembourg}} Luxembourg ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (LUF) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 40.3399 | |||
|- style="background-color: #CCCCCC;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Portugal}} Portuguese ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (PTE) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 200.482 | |||
|- style="background-color: #EEEEEE;" | |||
| {{flagicon|Spain}} Spanish ]s | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | (ESP) | |||
| style="text-align: right;" | 166.386 | |||
|} | |||
Due to differences in national conventions for rounding and significant digits, all conversion between the national currencies had to be carried out using the process of triangulation via the euro. The ''definitive'' values in euro of these subdivisions (which represent the ]s at which the currency entered the euro) are shown at right. | |||
=== Committed to adopt the euro <span class="anchor" id="Obliged to adopt the euro"></span> === | |||
The above rates were determined by the Council of the European Union, based on a recommendation from the European Commission based on the market rates on ] ], so that one ECU (]) would equal one euro. (The European Currency Unit was an accounting unit used by the EU, based on the currencies of the member states; it was not a currency in its own right.) These rates were set by Council Regulation 2866/98 (EC), of ] ]. They could not be set earlier, because the ECU depended on the closing exchange rate of the non-euro currencies (principally the ]) that day. | |||
{{See also|Bulgaria and the euro|Czech Republic and the euro|Hungary and the euro|Poland and the euro|Romania and the euro|Sweden and the euro}} | |||
The following ] member states committed themselves in their respective ] to adopt the euro. However they do not have a deadline to do so and can delay the process by deliberately not complying with the convergence criteria (such as by not meeting the convergence criteria to join ERM II). Bulgaria and Romania are actively working to adopt the euro, while the remaining states do not have a migration plan in progress. | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Bulgaria}}: The Bulgarian government aims to replace the ] with the euro by 2026.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Economic forecasts optimistic as Bulgaria moves closer to joining eurozone |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/economic-forecasts-optimistic-as-bulgaria-moves-closer-to-joining-eurozone/ |access-date=10 January 2025 |website= Euractiv}}</ref> In November 2023, Bulgarian euro coin design has been revealed and approved by the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The design of future Bulgarian euro coins has been approved |url=https://bnr.bg/en/post/101909237/the-design-of-future-bulgarian-euro-coins-has-been-approved |access-date=27 January 2024 |website=Radio Bulgaria}}</ref> | |||
] failed to meet the criteria for joining initially, so it did not join the common currency on ] ]. It was admitted two years later, on ] ], with a Greek ] (GRD) exchange rate of 340.750000. | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Czechia}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Hungary}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Poland}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Romania}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Sweden}} | |||
===Opt-out=== | |||
The procedure used to fix the irrevocable conversion rate between the drachma and the euro was different, since the euro by then was already two years old. While the conversion rates for the initial eleven currencies were determined only hours before the euro was introduced, the conversion rate for the Greek drachma was fixed several months beforehand, in Council Regulation 1478/2000 (EC), of ] ]. | |||
{{See also|Denmark and the euro}} | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Denmark}}: The government of Denmark negotiated an ] to retain its currency. | |||
==Coins and banknotes== | |||
The currency was introduced in non-physical form (travellers' cheques, electronic transfers, banking, etc.) at midnight on ] ], when the national currencies of participating countries (the Eurozone) ceased to exist independently in that their exchange rates were locked at fixed rates against each other, effectively making them mere non-decimal subdivisions of the euro. The euro thus became the successor to the ] (ECU). The notes and coins for the old currencies, however, continued to be used as ] until new notes and coins were introduced on ] ]. | |||
===Coins=== | |||
{{Main|Euro coins}} | |||
The euro is divided into 100 ] (also referred to as ''euro cents'', especially when distinguishing them from other currencies, and referred to as such on the common side of all cent coins). In Community legislative acts the plural forms of ''euro'' and ''cent'' are spelled without the ''s'', notwithstanding normal English usage.<ref name="ec.europa.eu">{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/cash/symbol/index_en.htm |title= How to use the euro name and symbol |publisher=European Commission |access-date=7 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication6336_en.pdf |title=Spelling of the words "euro" and "cent" in official Community languages as used in Community Legislative acts |access-date=26 November 2008 |author=European Commission }}</ref> Otherwise, normal English plurals are used,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/style_guides/english/style_guide_en.pdf |title=English Style Guide: A handbook for authors and translators in the European Commission |access-date=16 November 2008 |author=European Commission Directorate-General for Translation |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205092625/http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/style_guides/english/style_guide_en.pdf |archive-date=5 December 2010 }}; {{cite web |url=http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370303.htm |title=Interinstitutional style guide, 7.3.3. Rules for expressing monetary units |access-date=16 November 2008 |author=European Union }}</ref> with many ] such as ''centime'' in France. | |||
The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until ] ]. The official date on which the national currencies ceased to be legal tender varied from member state to member state. The earliest date was in ]; the ] officially ceased to be legal tender on ] ], though the exchange period lasted two months. The final date was ] ], by which all national currencies ceased to be legal tender in their respective member states. (Note that some of these dates were earlier than was originally planned.) However, even after the official date, they continued to be accepted by national central banks for several years up to forever (Austria, Germany, Ireland, Spain). The earliest coins to become non-convertible were the Portuguese escudos, which ceased to have monetary value after ] ], although banknotes remain exchangeable until 2022. | |||
All circulating coins have a ''common side'' showing the denomination or value, and a map in the background. Due to the ], the Latin alphabet version of ''euro'' is used (as opposed to the less common Greek or Cyrillic) and ] (other text is used on national sides in national languages, but other text on the common side is avoided). For the denominations except the 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins, the map only showed the 15 member states of the union as of 2002. Beginning in 2007 or 2008 (depending on the country), the old map was replaced by a map of Europe also showing countries outside the ].<ref name="europa-common_sides">{{cite web |title=Common sides of euro coins |url=https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/euro/euro-coins-and-notes/euro-coins/common-sides-euro-coins_en |website=Europa |publisher=European Commission |access-date=30 December 2023}}</ref> The 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins, however, keep their old design, showing a geographical map of Europe with the ] member states as of 2002, raised somewhat above the rest of the map. All common sides were designed by ]. The coins also have a ''national side'' showing an image specifically chosen by the country that issued the coin. Euro coins from any member state may be freely used in any nation that has adopted the euro. | |||
Although some countries are not printing the €500 and €200 banknotes, all banknotes are legal tender throughout the Eurozone. Finland decided not to mint or circulate one-cent and two-cent coins, except in small numbers for collectors. The Netherlands stopped minting these on ] ]. All cash transactions in these countries ending in one, two, six or seven cents are rounded down, and those ending in three, four, eight or nine cents are rounded up. Despite this convention, the one-cent and two-cent coins are still legal tender. | |||
The coins are issued in denominations of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. To avoid the use of the two smallest coins, some cash transactions are rounded to the nearest five cents in the Netherlands and Ireland<ref>{{cite web|url=http://neurope.eu/article/ireland-to-round-to-nearest-5-cents-starting-october-28/|title=Ireland to round to nearest 5 cents starting October 28|date=27 October 2015|access-date=17 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306012032/http://neurope.eu/article/ireland-to-round-to-nearest-5-cents-starting-october-28/|archive-date=6 March 2016|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.centralbank.ie/paycurr/Pages/rounding.aspx|title=Rounding |website= Central Bank of Ireland}}</ref> (by voluntary agreement) and in Finland and Italy (by law).<ref>{{cite web|author=European Commission|author-link=European Commission|title=Euro cash: five and familiar |url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/een/005/article_4324_en.htm |publisher=] |date = January 2007|access-date=26 January 2009}}</ref> This practice is discouraged by the commission, as is the practice of certain shops of refusing to accept high-value euro notes.<ref>Pop, Valentina (22 March 2010) , '']''</ref> | |||
===Current Eurozone (2002-2007)=== | |||
{{main|Eurozone}} | |||
[[Image:Euro_map_en.PNG|thumb|right|300px| | |||
{{legend|#4068b8|Eurozone countries}} | |||
{{legend|#f0b261|ERM II countries}} | |||
{{legend|#c55050|other EU countries}} | |||
{{legend|#976dc6|unilaterally adopted euro}}]] | |||
] with €2 face value have been issued with changes to the design of the national side of the coin. These include both commonly issued coins, such as the €2 commemorative coin for the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Rome, and nationally issued coins, such as the coin to commemorate the ] issued by Greece. These coins are legal tender throughout the eurozone. Collector coins with various other denominations have been issued as well, but these are not intended for general circulation, and they are legal tender only in the member state that issued them.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/economic_and_monetary_affairs/introducing_euro_practical_aspects/l25058_en.htm |title=Commission communication: The introduction of euro banknotes and coins one year after COM(2002) 747 |access-date=26 January 2009 |author=European Commission |publisher=Europa (web portal) |date=15 February 2003}}</ref> | |||
*The euro is sole currency in the following EU member states: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], the ], ] and ]. These 12 countries together are frequently referred to as the "]", or more informally "euroland" or the "eurogroup". The euro is also legal currency in the Eurozone overseas territories of ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
====Coin minting==== | |||
*By virtue of some bilateral the European mini states of ], ], and ] mint their own euro coins on behalf of the ]. | |||
A number of institutions are authorised to mint euro coins: | |||
{{div col|colwidth=25em}} | |||
* ] (]: D) | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (J) | |||
* ] | |||
* {{ill|Banknote and Securities Printing Foundation|el}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] (A) | |||
* ] (F): Stuttgart, (G): Karlsruhe | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
===Banknotes=== | |||
*], ] and ] adopted the foreign euro as their legal currency for movement of capital and payments without participation in the ] or the right to mint coins. Andorra is in the process of entering a monetary agreement similar to Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City. | |||
{{Main|Euro banknotes}} | |||
] and banknotes of various denominations]] | |||
The design for the ] has common designs on both sides. The design was created by the Austrian designer ].<ref name="euro96">{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/euro/changeover/2002/photos/html/image12.en.html |title=Robert Kalina, designer of the euro banknotes, at work at the Oesterreichische Nationalbank in Vienna |publisher=European Central Bank |access-date=30 May 2010}}</ref> Notes are issued in ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Each banknote has its own colour and is dedicated to an artistic period of European architecture. The front of the note features windows or gateways while the back has bridges, symbolising links between states in the union and with the future. While the designs are supposed to be devoid of any identifiable characteristics, the initial designs by Robert Kalina were of specific bridges, including the ] and the ], and were subsequently rendered more generic; the final designs still bear very close similarities to their specific prototypes; thus they are not truly generic. The monuments looked similar enough to different national monuments to please everyone.<ref>{{cite news|last=Schmid |first=John |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/03/news/03iht-euro_ed3_.html |title=Etching the Notes of a New European Identity|work=International Herald Tribune |date=3 August 2001 |access-date=29 May 2009}}</ref> | |||
===Future prospects (2007-)=== | |||
{{main article|Eurozone}} | |||
====Pre-2004 EU members==== | |||
From the launch of the euro in 1999 until the ] in 2004, ], ] and the ] were the only EU member states outside the monetary union. The situation for the three older member states also looks different from that of the ten new EU members; all three have no clear roadmap for adopting the euro: | |||
The Europa series, or second series, consists of six denominations and no longer includes the €500 with issuance discontinued as of 27 April 2019.<ref name="Bank">{{Cite web|title=Banknotes|url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/euro/banknotes/html/index.en.html|website=European Central Bank|access-date=2020-05-10}}</ref> However, both the first and the second series of euro banknotes, including the €500, remain legal tender throughout the euro area.<ref name="Bank"/> | |||
]. The text translates as "] and solidarity".]] | |||
* ]: According to the 1995 accession treaty, Sweden is required to join the euro and therefore must convert to the euro at some point. Notwithstanding this, on ] ], a consultative Swedish ] was held on the euro, the result of which was 55.9% against adopting the common currency versus 42.0% in favour. The Swedish government has argued that such a line of action is possible since one of the requirements for Eurozone membership is a prior two-year membership of the ERM II. By simply choosing to stay outside the exchange rate mechanism, the Swedish government is provided a formal loophole avoiding the theoretical requirement of adopting the euro. Some of Sweden's major parties continue to believe that it would be in the national interest to join, but they have all pledged to abide by the results for the time being and show no interest in raising the issue again. | |||
In December 2021, the ECB announced its plans to redesign euro banknotes by 2024. A theme advisory group, made up of one member from each euro area country, was selected to submit theme proposals to the ECB. The proposals will be voted on by the public; a design competition will also be held.<ref>{{cite journal|title=ECB to redesign euro banknotes by 2024 |url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2021/html/ecb.pr211206~a9e0ba2198.en.html |access-date=7 December 2021 |date=6 December 2021|website=European Central Bank}}</ref> | |||
* The ]'s ] believe that the single currency is merely a stepping stone to the formation of a unified European superstate, and that removing Britain's ability to set its own interest rates will have detrimental effects on its economy. Others in the UK, usually joined by eurosceptics, advance several economic arguments against membership: the most cited one concerns the large unfunded pension liabilities of many continental European governments (unlike in the UK) which would, with a greying population, depress the currency in the future against the UK's interests. The contrary view is that, since intra-European exports make up to 50% of the UK's total, it eases the Single Market by removing currency risk, although financial derivatives are becoming more accessible to small UK businesses thereby allowing businesses to offset this risk. An interesting parallel can be seen in the 19th century discussions concerning the possibility of the UK joining the ] . Many British people also simply like ] as a currency as it is part of British heritage. The UK government has set ] that must be passed before it can recommend that the UK join the euro; however, given the relatively subjective nature of these tests it seems unlikely that they would be held to be fulfilled whilst public opinion remains so strongly against participation. | |||
====Issuing modalities for banknotes==== | |||
* ] negotiated a number of opt-out clauses from the ] after it had been rejected in a first referendum. On ] ], another referendum was held in Denmark regarding the euro resulting in a 53.2% vote against joining. However, Danish politicians have suggested that debate on abolishing the four opt-out clauses may possibly be re-opened in 2006. In addition, Denmark has pegged its ] to the euro (€1 = DKr7.460,38 ± 2.25%) as the krone remains in the ]. | |||
Since 1 January 2002, the national central banks (NCBs) and the ] have issued euro banknotes on a joint basis.<ref name="Scheller">{{Cite book|url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecbhistoryrolefunctions2006en.pdf|quote=Since 1 January 2002, the NCBs and the ECB have issued euro banknotes on a joint basis. |title=The European Central Bank: History, Role and Functions|first=Hanspeter K. |last=Scheller |edition=2nd |date= 2006|isbn=978-92-899-0027-0 |page=103|publisher=European Central Bank }}</ref> Eurosystem NCBs are required to accept euro banknotes put into circulation by other Eurosystem members and these banknotes are not repatriated. The ECB issues 8% of the total value of banknotes issued by the Eurosystem.<ref name="Scheller"/> In practice, the ECB's banknotes are put into circulation by the NCBs, thereby incurring matching liabilities vis-à-vis the ECB. These liabilities carry interest at the main refinancing rate of the ECB. The other 92% of euro banknotes are issued by the NCBs in proportion to their respective shares of the ECB capital key,<ref name="Scheller"/> calculated using national share of European Union (EU) population and national share of EU GDP, equally weighted.<ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url=http://www.ecb.int/ecb/orga/capital/html/index.en.html | |||
|title=Capital Subscription | |||
|publisher=European Central Bank | |||
|access-date=18 December 2011 | |||
|quote=The NCBs' shares in this capital are calculated using a key which reflects the respective country's share in the total population and gross domestic product of the EU – in equal weightings. The ECB adjusts the shares every five years and whenever a new country joins the EU. The adjustment is done on the basis of data provided by the European Commission. | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
==== |
====Banknote printing==== | ||
Member states are authorised to print or to commission bank note printing. {{as of|November 2022}}, these are the printers: | |||
In 2004 the 10 new EU member states had a currency other than the euro; however, those countries are required by their ] to join the euro. | |||
{{div col|colwidth=25em}} | |||
Some of the following countries have already joined the ], ERM II. They and the others have set themselves the goal to join the euro (]) as follows: | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
===Payments clearing, electronic funds transfer=== | |||
*] ] for ]. (Date confirmed and finalized by the European Commission) | |||
{{Main|Single Euro Payments Area}} | |||
*] ] for ], ], ] and ] | |||
*] ] for ] and ] | |||
*Mid-January 2009 for ] | |||
*] ] for the ] and ]. | |||
*2011 or later for ] and ] | |||
Capital within the EU may be transferred in any amount from one state to another. All intra-Union transfers in euro are treated as domestic transactions and bear the corresponding domestic transfer costs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R2560:EN:HTML|title=Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 on cross-border payments in euro |publisher=EUR-lex – European Communities, Publications office, Official Journal L 344, 28 December 2001 P. 0013 – 0016 |access-date=26 December 2008}}</ref> This includes all member states of the EU, even those outside the eurozone providing the transactions are carried out in euro.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.euro.gov.uk/crossborder.asp |title=Cross border payments in the EU, Euro Information, The Official Treasury Euro Resource |publisher=United Kingdom Treasury |access-date=26 December 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201114647/http://www.euro.gov.uk/crossborder.asp |archive-date=1 December 2008 }}</ref> Credit/debit card charging and ATM withdrawals within the eurozone are also treated as domestic transactions; however paper-based payment orders, like cheques, have not been standardised so these are still domestic-based. The ECB has also set up a ], ] since March 2023, for large euro transactions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/paym/target/html/index.en.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080121081217/http://www.ecb.int/paym/target/html/index.en.html |archive-date=21 January 2008 |title=TARGET |author=European Central Bank |access-date=25 October 2007}}</ref> | |||
However, a country's entry to the Eurozone is subject to fulfilling the economical ] during the ERM II stage. For instance, too high an inflation rate postponed the entry of Lithuania as planned on ] ]. | |||
==History== | |||
], ], ] and ] have already finalised the design for the country's coins' obverse side. | |||
{{Main|History of the euro}} | |||
===Introduction=== | |||
] and ] are not yet members of the EU, but are scheduled to enter on ] ]. | |||
{{Euro adoption past|group="note"}} | |||
The euro was established by the provisions in the 1992 ]. To participate in the currency, member states are meant to meet ], such as a budget ] of less than 3% of their GDP, a debt ratio of less than 60% of GDP (both of which were ultimately widely flouted after introduction), low inflation, and ] rates close to the EU average. In the Maastricht Treaty, the United Kingdom and Denmark were granted exemptions per their request from moving to the stage of monetary union which resulted in the introduction of the euro (see also ]). | |||
* The ] and the Bulgarian government have agreed on the introduction of the euro in mid-2009, when the Bulgarian National Bank is expected to become part of the EMU and will receive the right to issue Bulgarian euro coins. The early accession to the EMU is due to existing ] agreement that was signed in 1997 to help put an end to the deep financial crisis and foreign debt reimbursement problems. The agreement effectively binds the Bulgarian lev to the euro (between 1997 and 1999, before the euro came into existence, the lev was bound to the ]). As a consequence, Bulgaria has fulfilled the great majority of the EMU membership criteria. | |||
The name "euro" was officially adopted in ] on 16 December 1995.<ref name="madrid1995"/> Belgian ] ], a former teacher of French and history, is credited with naming the new currency by sending a letter to then ], ], suggesting the name "euro" on 4 August 1995.<ref>{{Cite news | title= Germain Pirlot 'uitvinder' van de euro | url= http://www.ikso.net/vikipedio/artikeleuro.jpg | publisher= De Zeewacht | language= nl | date= 16 February 2007 | access-date= 21 May 2012 | url-status=dead | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130630181850/http://www.ikso.net/vikipedio/artikeleuro.jpg | archive-date= 30 June 2013 }}</ref> | |||
* In Romania, the ] retained its monetary policy attributes throughout the financial crisis of the 1990s (which gradually ended). Hence, Romania's accession to the EMU will take more time. It is likely that Romania will join the Eurozone in the 2010–12 period, and strategies have been established to this end. To simplify future adjustments to ] at the adoption of the euro, when the Romanian new Leu was adopted in 2005 (at 10,000 old Lei to 1 new Leu) the new banknotes were issued to the same physical proportions as euro banknotes, the old leu notes being substantially longer in relation to their width. | |||
Due to differences in national conventions for ] and significant digits, all conversion between the national currencies had to be carried out using the process of ] via the euro. The ''definitive'' values of one euro in terms of the ]s at which the currency entered the euro are shown in the table. | |||
====Public opinion after the European Constitution referenda==== | |||
Although the failure of the ] to be ratified would have no direct impact on the status of the euro, some debate regarding the euro arose after the negative outcome of the French and Dutch referenda in mid 2005. | |||
The rates were determined by the ],{{efn|by means of Council Regulation 2866/98 (EC) of 31 December 1998.}} based on a recommendation from the European Commission based on the market rates on 31 December 1998. They were set so that one ] (ECU) would equal one euro. The European Currency Unit was an accounting unit used by the EU, based on the currencies of the member states; it was not a currency in its own right. They could not be set earlier, because the ECU depended on the closing exchange rate of the non-euro currencies (principally ]) that day. | |||
*A poll by Stern magazine released ] ] found that 56% of Germans would favour a return to the mark. | |||
*Members of the ] northern Italian separatist political party, have discussed calling a referendum to return Italy to the Lira. | |||
*Members of the ] political party have proposed holding a referendum to return France to the Franc. | |||
*In contrast to Germany a poll in Austria on ] ] showed the overwhelming support of the euro: 73 percent of the sample said they preferred to keep the common currency with only 21 percent in favour of returning to the old currency the schilling. | |||
The procedure used to fix the conversion rate between the ] and the euro was different since the euro by then was already two years old. While the conversion rates for the initial eleven currencies were determined only hours before the euro was introduced, the conversion rate for the Greek drachma was fixed several months beforehand.{{efn|by Council Regulation 1478/2000 (EC) of 19 June 2000.}} | |||
However, soon after these suggestions were made, the ] issued a statement denying any possibility of this, stating "the euro is here to stay". <!-- personal views on this go in Discussion page --> | |||
The currency was introduced in non-physical form (]s, electronic transfers, banking, etc.) at midnight on 1 January 1999, when the national currencies of participating countries (the eurozone) ceased to exist independently. Their exchange rates were locked at fixed rates against each other. The euro thus became the successor to the ] (ECU). The notes and coins for the old currencies, however, continued to be used as ] until new euro notes and coins were introduced on 1 January 2002. | |||
==Eurozone as an optimal currency area?== | |||
{{main|Optimal Currency Area - Eurozone}} | |||
The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002. The official date on which the national currencies ceased to be legal tender varied from member state to member state. The earliest date was in Germany, where the ] officially ceased to be legal tender on 31 December 2001, though the exchange period lasted for two months more. Even after the old currencies ceased to be legal tender, they continued to be accepted by national central banks for periods ranging from several years to indefinitely (the latter for Austria, Germany, Ireland, Estonia and Latvia in banknotes and coins, and for Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Slovakia in banknotes only). The earliest coins to become non-convertible were the Portuguese ], which ceased to have monetary value after 31 December 2002, although banknotes remained exchangeable until 2022.{{clear}} | |||
In economic theory the degree of fullfillment of the following four criteria indicate whether an area is optimal for a monetary union. These criteria are often called the ] (OCA) criteria. Although these criteria are not exhaustive and far from absolute, they are generally accepted as a sufficient measure. There are three economic criteria (labour and capital mobility, product diversification, and openness) and one political criterion (fiscal transfers). All these criteria stand in relation to the ability to deal with asymmetric shocks (i.e. shocks that only hit one area). Symmetric shocks are less problematic in a currency area as the currency will depreciate or appreciate to the needed level for all areas (as this level is the same for all areas), while asymmetric shocks will create an exchange rate that is too high for one area and one that is too low for the other. This causes wage and price changes and unemployment problems. | |||
===Currency sign=== | |||
*] formulated the idea that perfect ] and ] would mitigate the adverse consequences of asymmetric shocks in a currency area. While capital is quite mobile in the Eurozone, labour mobility is relatively low, especially when compared to the ] and ]. | |||
] | |||
{{Main|Euro sign}} | |||
A special ] (€) was designed after a public survey had narrowed ten of the original thirty proposals down to two. The ] at the time (]) and the European Commissioner with responsibility for the euro (]) then chose the winning design.<ref>{{cite web |title=The euro, our currency {{!}} A symbol for the European currency |date=18 March 2009 |access-date=8 April 2023 |publisher=European Commission |url=https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/events/2009/theeuro/isola3_en2008-2009.pdf}}</ref> | |||
*] formulated the idea that widely diversified production and export structures that are similar between the areas that form the currency area lower the effect and probability of asymmetric shocks. The Eurozone scores quite well on this criterion, and monetary integration seems to further improve the diversification of production structures. | |||
Regarding the symbol, the ] stated on behalf of the ]: | |||
*] formulated the idea that areas which are very open to ] and trade heavily with each other form an optimum currency area. This is because the high trade intensity will lower the significance of the distinction between domestic and foreign ] as ] will equalize the ]s of most goods, independently of ]s. The Eurozone members trade heavily with each other, and all evidence so far seems to indicate that the monetary union has at least doubled trade between members. | |||
{{blockquote|The symbol € is based on the Greek letter epsilon (Є), with the first letter in the word "Europe" and with 2 parallel lines signifying stability.|source=]<ref name="design, rules">{{cite web |title=Institutions, law, budget {{!}} The Euro {{!}} Design |author=Directorate-General for Communication |publisher=European Union |access-date=8 April 2022 |url= https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/euro/design_en}}</ref>}} | |||
*The term "] transfers" refers to the transfer of money between areas. This could decrease the adverse consequences of asymmetric shocks as the areas that are hit, would receive money. This would create a counter ] effect and thus lower the price and wage changes and unemployment wouldn't rise as much. In reality however there is a no-bail out clause in the ], meaning that fiscal transfers are not allowed. | |||
The European Commission also specified a euro logo with exact proportions.<ref name="design, rules" /> Placement of the currency sign relative to the numeric amount varies from state to state, but for texts in English published by EU institutions, the symbol (or the ]-standard "EUR") should precede the amount.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370303.htm#position|title=Position of the ISO code or euro sign in amounts|date=5 February 2009|work=Interinstitutional style guide|publisher=Europa Publications Office|access-date=10 January 2010|location=Bruxelles, Belgium}}</ref> | |||
In general, economic research state that is impossible to say whether Eurozone members would benefit from a currency area, as two important criteria support a monetary union, while at the same time two important criteria oppose such an union. | |||
===Eurozone crisis=== | |||
==Effects of the single currency== | |||
] bonds floated together in parity | |||
]]] | |||
{{legend-line|#001489 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
The introduction of a single currency for many separate countries presents a number of advantages and disadvantages for the participating nations. Opinions differ on the actual effects of the euro so far, as most of them will take years to understand. Theories and predictions abound. | |||
{{legend-line|#046A38 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
{{legend-line|#FF8200 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
{{legend-line|#F1BF00 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
{{legend-line|#CD212A solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
{{legend-line|#970E53 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
{{legend-line|#000000 solid 3px|] 10 year bond}} | |||
]] | |||
{{main|European debt crisis|Greek government-debt crisis}} | |||
{{see also|2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisis}} | |||
] | |||
===Removal of exchange rate risk=== | |||
One of the most important benefits of the euro will be lowered ] risks, which will make it easier to invest across borders. The risks of changes in the value of respective currencies has always made it risky for companies or individuals to invest or even import/export outside their own currency zone. Profits could be quickly eliminated as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. As a result, most investors and importers/exporters have to either accept the risk or ] their bets, resulting in further costs on the financial markets. Consequently, it is less appealing to invest outside one's own currency zone. The Eurozone greatly increases the potentially "exchange-risk free" investment area. Since Europe's economy is heavily dependent on intra-European exports, the benefits of this effect can hardly be overstated. This is particularly important for countries whose currencies have traditionally fluctuated a great deal such as the Mediterranean nations. | |||
Following the U.S. financial crisis in 2008, fears of a ] developed in 2009 among investors concerning some European states, with the situation becoming particularly tense in ].<ref>{{Cite news|url= https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE61F0W720100216 |title=Peripheral euro zone government bond spreads widen |work=Reuters |author=George Matlock |date=16 February 2010 |access-date=28 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/node/16009099 | title=Acropolis now |newspaper=The Economist |date=29 April 2010 |access-date=22 June 2011}}</ref> ] was most acutely affected, but fellow Eurozone members ], ], ], ], and ] were also significantly affected.<ref>, CNN Library (last updated 22 January 2017).</ref><ref>], , ''Brookings Papers on Economic Activity'', ] (Fall 2015), p. 433.</ref> All these countries used EU funds except Italy, which is a major donor to the EFSF.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.linkiesta.it/it/article/2011/11/04/efsf-come-funziona-il-fondo-salvastati-europeo/2302/|title=Efsf, come funziona il fondo salvastati europeo|date=4 November 2011}}</ref> To be included in the eurozone, countries had to fulfil certain ], but the meaningfulness of such criteria was diminished by the fact it was not enforced with the same level of strictness among countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3454 |title=The politics of the Maastricht convergence criteria|publisher=VoxEU |date=15 April 2009 |access-date=1 October 2011}}</ref> | |||
At the same time, this is likely to increase foreign investment in countries with more liberal markets and reduce that in those with rigid markets. Some people worry that thus will see profits flowing away from particular member states to the detriment of their traditional social values. It might also result in the reduction of local decision makers in businesses. | |||
According to the ] in 2011, "f the is treated as a single entity, its position looks no worse and in some respects, rather better than that of the US or the UK" and the budget deficit for the euro area as a whole is much lower and the euro area's government debt/GDP ratio of 86% in 2010 was about the same level as that of the United States. "Moreover", they write, "private-sector indebtedness across the euro area as a whole is markedly lower than in the highly leveraged ] economies". The authors conclude that the crisis "is as much political as economic" and the result of the fact that the euro area lacks the support of "institutional ] (and mutual bonds of solidarity) of a state".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pages.eiu.com/rs/eiu2/images/EuroDebtPaperMarch2011.pdf |title=State of the Union: Can the euro zone survive its debt crisis?|page=4 |publisher=] |date=1 March 2011 |access-date=1 December 2011}}</ref> | |||
===Removal of conversion fees=== | |||
A benefit is the removal of ] transaction charges that previously were a cost to both individuals and ]es when exchanging from one national currency to another. Although not an enormous cost, multiplied thousands of times, the savings add up across the entire economy. | |||
The crisis continued with S&P downgrading the credit rating of nine euro-area countries, including France, then downgrading the entire ] (EFSF) fund.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eurozone-efsf-sp-idUSTRE80F1OV20120116|title=S&P downgrades euro zone's EFSF bailout fund|date=2017-01-16|work=Reuters|access-date=2017-01-21}}</ref> | |||
For electronic payments (e.g. ]s, ]s and ] withdrawals), banks in the Eurozone must now charge the same for intra-member cross-border transactions as they charge for domestic transactions. Banks in ] have attempted to circumvent this regulation by charging for all bank transfers (domestic and cross-border) unless the transfer is instructed via ] — a method through which they do not offer cross-border payments. In this way, banks in France continue to charge more for cross-border transfers than for domestic transfers.{{citation needed}} | |||
A historical parallel – to 1931 when Germany was burdened with debt, unemployment and austerity while France and the United States were relatively strong creditors – ] in summer 2012<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/euro-crisis-brings-world-to-brink-of-depression-2012-07-24 |title=Euro crisis brings world to brink of depression |first=Darrell | last= Delamaide |website=MarketWatch |date=24 July 2012 |access-date=24 July 2012}}</ref> even as Germany received a ] warning of its own.<ref>Lindner, Fabian, "", ''The Guardian'', 24 July 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2012.</ref><ref>Buergin, Rainer, " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120728105157/http://washpost.bloomberg.com/Story?docId=1376-M7MTLK6K50YQ01-2MU1077HDEEK0FPVVG6AUS88JB |date=28 July 2012 }}", ''washpost.bloomberg'', 24 July 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2012.</ref> | |||
===Deeper financial markets=== | |||
Another significant advantage of switching to the euro is the creation of deeper financial markets. Financial markets on the continent are expected to be far more ] and flexible than they were in the past. There will be more competition for, and availability of financial products across the union. This will reduce the financial servicing costs to businesses and possibly even individual consumers across the continent. The costs associated with public debt will also decrease. It is expected that the broader, deeper markets will lead to increased stock market ] and investment. Larger, more internationally competitive financial and business institutions may arise. | |||
==Direct and indirect usage== | |||
{{Further|Eurozone|International status and usage of the euro|Enlargement of the eurozone}} | |||
{{Eurozone labelled map interior}} | |||
===Agreed direct usage with minting rights=== | |||
The euro is the sole currency of 20 ]: Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain. These countries constitute the "]", some 347 million people in total {{As of|2023|lc=y}}.<ref name="2013_data_sheet">{{cite web|url=http://www.prb.org/pdf13/2013-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf|title=2013 World Population Data Sheet|author=Population Reference Bureau|author-link=Population Reference Bureau|access-date=2013-10-01|archive-date=26 February 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150226072048/http://www.prb.org/pdf13/2013-population-data-sheet_eng.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> According to ], the euro has also been designated as the sole and official currency in a further four ] awarded minting rights (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City). All but one (Denmark) current, and any potential future EU members, are ] when economic conditions permit. | |||
===Agreed direct usage without minting rights=== | |||
The euro is also the sole currency in three ] that are not themselves part of the EU, namely ], ], and the ], as well as in the ] of ].<ref>{{cite web | title=Sovereign Base areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on Cyprus |url=https://commonwealthchamber.com/associated-territories/sovereign-base-areas-of-akrotiri-and-dhekelia-on-cyprus/ |website=Commonwealth Chamber of Commerce}}</ref> | |||
===Unilateral direct usage=== | |||
The euro has been adopted unilaterally as the sole currency of Montenegro and Kosovo. It has also been used as a foreign trading currency in Cuba since 1998,<ref>{{cite news| title=Cuba to adopt euro in foreign trade |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/210441.stm |work=BBC News |date=8 November 1998 |access-date=2 January 2008}}</ref> Syria since 2006,<ref>{{cite news| title= US row leads Syria to snub dollar | url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4713622.stm |work=BBC News |date=14 February 2006 | access-date=2 January 2008}}</ref> and Venezuela since 2018.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-16/dollars-are-out-euros-are-in-as-u-s-sanctions-sting-venezuela|title=Dollars Are Out, Euros Are in as U.S. Sanctions Sting Venezuela|last1=Rosati|first1=Andrew|date=17 October 2018|work=]|access-date=17 June 2019|last2=Zerpa|first2=Fabiola}}</ref> In 2009, Zimbabwe abandoned its ] and introduced major global convertible currencies instead, including the euro and the United States dollar. The direct usage of the euro outside of the official framework of the EU affects nearly 3 million people.<ref>{{Cite news| title=Zimbabwe: A Critical Review of Sterp |url=http://allafrica.com/stories/200904170690.html |date=17 April 2009 |access-date=30 April 2009}}</ref> | |||
===Currencies pegged to the euro=== | |||
{{Main|International status and usage of the euro}} | |||
[[File:DOLLAR AND EURO IN THE WORLD.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|Worldwide use of the euro and the US dollar: | |||
{{Legend|#092D98|]}} | |||
{{Legend|#98b3ff|External adopters of the euro}} | |||
{{Legend|#510999|Currencies pegged to the euro}} | |||
{{Legend|#CC99FF|Currencies pegged to the euro within narrow band}} | |||
{{Legend|#099811|United States}} | |||
{{Legend|#99FF9E|External adopters of the US dollar}} | |||
{{Legend|#999909|Currencies pegged to the US dollar}} | |||
{{Legend|#FFFF99|Currencies pegged to the US dollar within narrow band}} | |||
<hr/> | |||
<small>Note: The ] is pegged to the euro, ] and ] in a ].</small>]] | |||
Outside the eurozone, two EU member states have currencies that are ], which is a precondition to joining the eurozone. The ] and ] are pegged due to their participation in the ]. | |||
Additionally, a total of 22 countries and territories that do not belong to the EU have currencies that are directly ] to the euro including 14 countries in mainland Africa (]), three African island countries (], ] and ] (since 1 January 2010)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.telanon.info/economia/2010/01/04/2437/1-euro-equivale-a-24500-dobras/|title=1 euro equivale a 24.500 dobras|date=4 January 2009|trans-title=1 euro is equivalent to 24,500 dobras|language=pt|access-date=16 November 2020|publisher=Téla Nón}}</ref>), three French Pacific territories (]) and two Balkan countries, Bosnia and Herzegovina (]) and North Macedonia (]).<ref name="Cardoso"/> Additionally, the ] is tied to a basket of currencies, including the euro and the US dollar, with the euro given the highest weighting. | |||
These countries generally had previously implemented a currency peg to one of the major European currencies (e.g. the ], ] or ]), and when these currencies were replaced by the euro their currencies became pegged to the euro. Pegging a country's currency to a major currency is regarded as a safety measure, especially for currencies of areas with weak economies, as the euro is seen as a stable currency, prevents runaway inflation, and encourages foreign investment due to its stability. | |||
In total, {{As of|2013|lc=y}}, 182 million people in Africa use a currency pegged to the euro, 27 million people outside the eurozone in Europe, and another 545,000 people on Pacific islands.<ref name="2013_data_sheet"/> | |||
Since 2005, stamps issued by the ] have been denominated in euros, although the Order's official currency remains the ].<ref name=smom>{{cite web| url = https://www.orderofmalta.int/associate-countries/| title = Retrieved 3 October 2017.}}</ref> The Maltese scudo itself is pegged to the euro and is only recognised as legal tender within the Order. | |||
The currency of a number of states is ] to the euro. These states are: | |||
{{div col|colwidth=25em}} | |||
'''North America''' | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Haiti}} (], {{ISO 4217|HTG}}) | |||
'''Europe''' | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Albania}} (], {{ISO 4217|ALL}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} (], {{ISO 4217|BAM}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Bulgaria}} (], {{ISO 4217|BGN}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Denmark}} (], {{ISO 4217|DKK}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|North Macedonia}} (], {{ISO 4217|MKD}})<ref name="Cardoso">{{cite web |last=Cardoso |first=Paulo |title=Interview – Governor of the National Bank of Macedonia – Dimitar Bogov |url=http://www.the-american-times.com/american-times-governor-national-bank-macedonia-dimitar-bogov/2013/10/05 |work=The American Times United States Emerging Economies Report (USEER Report) |publisher=Hazlehurst Media SA |access-date=8 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020073010/http://www.the-american-times.com/american-times-governor-national-bank-macedonia-dimitar-bogov/2013/10/05 |archive-date=20 October 2013 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Sovereign Military Order of Malta}} (])<ref>{{Cite web |title=Numismatica|url=https://www.ordinedimaltaitalia.org/article/numismatica |access-date=2022-04-30 |website=Ordine di Malta Italia}}</ref> | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Moldova}} (], {{ISO 4217|MDL}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Romania}} (], {{ISO 4217|RON}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Serbia}} (], {{ISO 4217|RSD}}) | |||
'''Oceania''' | |||
* {{Flagcountry|French Polynesia}} (], {{ISO 4217|XPF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|New Caledonia}} (CFP franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Wallis and Futuna}} (CFP franc) | |||
'''Africa''' | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Burundi}} (], {{ISO 4217|BIF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Cape Verde}} (], {{ISO 4217|CVE}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Cameroon}} (], {{ISO 4217|XAF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Central African Republic}} (Central African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Chad}} (Central African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Equatorial Guinea}} (Central African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Gabon}} (Central African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Republic of the Congo}} (Central African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Comoros}} (], {{ISO 4217|KMF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Democratic Republic of the Congo}} (], {{ISO 4217|CDF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Djibouti}} (], {{ISO 4217|DJF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Eritrea}} (], {{ISO 4217|ERN}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Ethiopia}} (], {{ISO 4217|ETB}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Gambia}} (], {{ISO 4217|GMD}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Guinea}} (], {{ISO 4217|GNF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Madagascar}} (], {{ISO 4217|MGA}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Mozambique}} (], {{ISO 4217|MZN}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Rwanda}} (], {{ISO 4217|RWF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic}} (]) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|São Tomé and Príncipe}} (], {{ISO 4217|STN}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Sierra Leone}} (], {{ISO 4217|SLE}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Benin}} (], {{ISO 4217|XOF}}) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Burkina Faso}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Côte d'Ivoire}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Guinea-Bissau}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Mali}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Niger}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Senegal}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
* {{Flagcountry|Togo}} (West African CFA franc) | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
===Use as reserve currency=== | |||
Since its introduction in 1999, the euro has been the second most widely held international ] after the U.S. dollar. The share of the euro as a reserve currency increased from 18% in 1999 to 27% in 2008. Over this period, the share held in U.S. dollar fell from 71% to 64% and that held in RMB fell from 6.4% to 3.3%. The euro inherited and built on the status of the ] as the second most important reserve currency. The euro remains underweight as a reserve currency in advanced economies while overweight in emerging and developing economies: according to the ]<ref name="external1">{{cite web|url=http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/cofer/eng/cofer.pdf |title=Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) – Updated COFER tables include first quarter 2009 data. June 30, 2009 |access-date=8 July 2009}}</ref> the total of euro held as a reserve in the world at the end of 2008 was equal to $1.1 trillion or €850 billion, with a share of 22% of all currency reserves in advanced economies, but a total of 31% of all currency reserves in emerging and developing economies. | |||
The possibility of the euro becoming the first international reserve currency has been debated among economists.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wage.wisc.edu/uploads/Working%20Papers/chinnfrankel_NBER_eurotopcurrency.pdf |title=Will the Euro Eventually Surpass the Dollar As Leading International Reserve Currency? |access-date=17 July 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130825070016/http://www.wage.wisc.edu/uploads/Working%20Papers/chinnfrankel_NBER_eurotopcurrency.pdf |archive-date=25 August 2013 }}</ref> Former ] Chairman ] gave his opinion in September 2007 that it was "absolutely conceivable that the euro will replace the US dollar as reserve currency, or will be traded as an equally important reserve currency".<ref>{{Cite news| title=Euro could replace dollar as top currency – Greenspan | url=https://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSL1771147920070917 | access-date=17 September 2007 | date=17 September 2007 |work=Reuters}}</ref> In contrast to Greenspan's 2007 assessment, the euro's increase in the share of the worldwide currency reserve basket has slowed considerably since 2007 and since the beginning of the worldwide ] related recession and ].<ref name="external1"/> | |||
==Economics== | |||
===Optimal currency area=== | |||
{{Further|Optimum currency area}} | |||
In economics, an optimum currency area, or region (OCA or OCR), is a geographical region in which it would maximise economic efficiency to have the entire region share a single currency. There are two models, both proposed by ]: the ] and the ]. Mundell himself advocates the international risk sharing model and thus concludes in favour of the euro.<ref>{{cite book|chapter=A Plan for a European Currency |date=1970 |orig-year=published 1973|last=Mundell |first=Robert|editor1=Johnson, H. G. | editor2= Swoboda, A. K. | title = The Economics of Common Currencies{{snd}} Proceedings of Conference on Optimum Currency Areas. 1970. Madrid. | publisher= Allen and Unwin | location = London |pages= 143–172 | isbn= 9780043320495}}</ref> However, even before the creation of the single currency, there were concerns over diverging economies. Before the ] it was considered unlikely that a state would leave the euro or the whole zone would collapse.<ref>{{cite journal |ssrn=1014341 |title=The Breakup of the Euro Area by Barry Eichengreen |date=14 September 2007 |journal=] |number=w13393|last1=Eichengreen |first1=Barry }}</ref> However the ] led to former ] ] claiming the eurozone could not last in its current form.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13839381 |title=Greek debt crisis: Straw says eurozone 'will collapse' |work=] |date=20 June 2011 |access-date=17 July 2011}}</ref> Part of the problem seems to be the rules that were created when the euro was set up. John Lanchester, writing for '']'', explains it: {{blockquote|The guiding principle of the currency, which opened for business in 1999, were supposed to be a set of rules to limit a country's annual deficit to three per cent of gross domestic product, and the total accumulated debt to sixty per cent of G.D.P. It was a nice idea, but by 2004 the two biggest economies in the euro zone, Germany and France, had broken the rules for three years in a row.<ref>John Lanchester, "Euro Science", ''The New Yorker'', 10 October 2011.</ref>}} | |||
Increasing business cycle divergence across the Eurozone over the last decades implies a decreasing Optimum Currency Area.<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1007/s11079-024-09750-z | title=Optimum Currency Area in the Eurozone | date=2024 | last1=Beck | first1=Krzysztof | last2=Okhrimenko | first2=Iana | journal=Open Economies Review | doi-access=free |issn = 0923-7992 }}</ref> | |||
===Transaction costs and risks=== | |||
The most obvious benefit of adopting a single currency is to remove the cost of exchanging currency, theoretically allowing businesses and individuals to consummate previously unprofitable trades. For consumers, banks in the eurozone must charge the same for intra-member cross-border transactions as purely domestic transactions for electronic payments (e.g., ]s, ]s and ] withdrawals). | |||
Financial markets on the continent are expected to be far more ] and flexible than they were in the past. The reduction in cross-border transaction costs will allow larger banking firms to provide a wider array of banking services that can compete across and beyond the eurozone. However, although transaction costs were reduced, some studies have shown that ] has increased during the last 40 years in the Eurozone.<ref>Benchimol, J., 2014. , ], vol. 68, issue 1, pp. 40–56.</ref> | |||
===Price parity=== | ===Price parity=== | ||
Another effect of the common European currency is that differences in prices—in particular in price levels—should decrease. Differences in prices can trigger ], e.g. artificial trade in a commodity between countries purely to exploit the price differential, which will tend to equalise prices across the euro area. It is held that this is supposed to result in increased competition or consolidation of companies, which should help to contain inflation and which therefore will be beneficial to consumers. Similarly, price transparency across borders should help consumers find lower cost goods or services. | |||
Another effect of the common European currency is that differences in prices—in particular in price levels—should decrease because of the ]. Differences in prices can trigger ], i.e., ] trade in a ] across borders purely to exploit the price differential. Therefore, prices on commonly traded goods are likely to converge, causing inflation in some regions and deflation in others during the transition. Some evidence of this has been observed in specific eurozone markets.<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Pinelopi K. |last1=Goldberg |first2=Frank |last2=Verboven |title=Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market |journal=Journal of International Economics |volume=65 |issue=1 |year=2005 |pages=49–73 |doi=10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.12.002 |citeseerx=10.1.1.494.1517 |s2cid=26850030 }}</ref> | |||
===Competitive funding=== | |||
Competitive funding is also a benefit for many countries (and companies) that adopted the euro. National and corporate ]s denominated in euro are significantly more liquid and have lower interest rates than was historically the case when denominated in legacy currency. Likewise, companies have greater freedom to borrow competitively from cross-border banks without incurring exchange rate risk. This has forced the incumbent banks to reduce their rates to compete. <!-- Ireland provides an example of both. I'm sure that a web search will find. --> | |||
===Macroeconomic stability=== | ===Macroeconomic stability=== | ||
{{further|]}}<!-- Advice to editors: this article is already too long and this is only a summary, so if at all possible please develop the ECB article instead of this one --> | |||
Improved macroeconomic stability is an important benefit of the euro for the entire continent. Much of Europe has been susceptible to economic problems such as ] throughout the last 50 years. Inflation is a very damaging phenomenon from most of society’s perspective. It discourages investment, can cause social unrest, and causes problems for those on fixed incomes and for ]ation. However, many countries have been unable or unwilling to deal with serious inflationary pressures. They often have other priorities that compromise their ability to do so. Sometimes their economic clout is simply insufficient, sometimes their parliamentary seats are at risk if they do. However, there have been models, particularly in those with largely independent central banks, that have successfully countered inflation. One such bank was the ] in Germany; since the European Central Bank is modeled on the Bundesbank, it is independent of the pressures of national governments. Since it has a mandate to keep inflationary pressures low, prices in Europe have been after the euro's introduction. (] data confirms this, nevertheless many citizens perceive it not to be the case). Unlike the ] in the US, it does not have a second objective to sustain growth and employment and consequently seems too conservative. | |||
Before the introduction of the euro, some countries had successfully contained inflation, which was then seen as a major economic problem, by establishing largely independent central banks. One such bank was the ] in Germany; the European Central Bank was modelled on the Bundesbank.<ref name="bundesbank">{{Cite book|title=The History of the Bundesbank: Lessons for the European Central Bank |last=de Haan |first=Jakob |year=2000 |publisher=Routledge |location=London |isbn=978-0-415-21723-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EaIV0OWlaokC}}</ref> | |||
===Less-specific monetary policy=== | |||
Some economists are concerned about the possible dangers of adopting a single currency for a large and diverse area. Because the Eurozone has a single ], and so a single ], set by the ECB, it cannot be fine-tuned for the economic situation in each individual country (however, prior to the introduction of the euro, exchange rate volatility had reduced substantially after the European currency crisis in the early 1990s). ] and ] in each country is thus the only way in which government-led economic stimulus can be introduced specific to each region or nation. This inflexible interest rate might stifle growth in some areas, while over-promoting it in others. The result could be extended periods of economic depression in some areas of the continent, disadvantaged by the central interest rate. Given such a situation resentment and friction within the community, and toward the bank, might well increase. Others point out that in today's globalised economy, individual countries do not really have power to effectively manage their monetary policy, as it creates other imbalances. This effect was already visible in the last European currency crises of 1992, when the Bundesbank was effectively coordinating monetary policy for the whole continent. | |||
The euro has come under criticism due to its regulation, lack of flexibility and rigidity towards sharing member states on issues such as nominal interest rates.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Silvia|first=Steven J|year=2004|title=Is the Euro Working? The Euro and European Labour Markets|jstor=4007858|volume=24|issue=2|pages=147–168|doi=10.1017/s0143814x0400008x|journal=Journal of Public Policy|s2cid=152633940}}</ref> | |||
Some proponents of the euro point out that the Eurozone is similar in size and population to the ], which has a single currency and a single monetary policy set by the Federal Reserve. However, the individual states that make up the US have less ] and a more homogeneous economy than the nations of the EU. Of particular concern in accordance with this theory is the notion that the economies of the EU may not all be 'in sync'— each may be at a different stage in the ] cycle, or just be experiencing different inflationary pressures. ] is also much lower in the Eurozone than across the United States, largely due to the vast differences in language and culture between European nations, and despite labour, capital and goods full mobility rules. | |||
Many national and corporate ] denominated in euro are significantly more liquid and have lower interest rates than was historically the case when denominated in national currencies. While increased liquidity may lower the ] on the bond, denominating the bond in a currency with low levels of inflation arguably plays a much larger role. A credible commitment to low levels of inflation and a stable debt reduces the risk that the value of the debt will be eroded by higher levels of inflation or default in the future, allowing debt to be issued at a lower nominal interest rate. | |||
There is also a cost in structurally keeping inflation lower than in the United States, United Kingdom, and China. The result is that seen from those countries, the euro has become expensive, making European products increasingly expensive for its largest importers; hence export from the eurozone becomes more difficult. | |||
It can also be argued that a single currency works for the USA because the ] is a hegemonic currency. Before the euro, eighty per cent of the world's currency reserves were held in US dollars. This gives the US economy a huge subsidy in that reserve dollars are invested in US institutions or foreign institutions under US control. This subsidy helps cushion the effects of a possible strong dollar hurting certain regions of the US. | |||
In general, those in Europe who own large amounts of euro are served by high stability and low inflation. | |||
If the euro were to become either a hegemonic currency replacing the dollar or a co-hegemonic currency equal in reserve status to the dollar, some of the subsidy the US gains would be transferred to the EU and help balance out some of the problems of the present heterogeneous economic structure still in place. | |||
A ] means states in that union lose the main mechanism of recovery of their international ] by weakening (]) their currency. When ]s become too high compared to ] in the exports sector, then these exports become more expensive and they are crowded out from the market within a country and abroad. This drives the fall of employment and output in the exports sector and fall of ] and ] balances. Fall of output and employment in the tradable goods sector may be offset by the growth of non-exports sectors, especially in ] and ]. Increased purchases abroad and negative current account balances can be financed without a problem as long as ] is cheap.<ref>{{cite web |author1=Ernest Pytlarczyk, Stefan Kawalec |title=Controlled Dismantlement of the Euro Area in Order to Preserve the European Union and Single European Market |url=http://www.case-research.eu/en/controlled-dismantlement-of-the-euro-area-in-order-to-preserve-the-european-union-and-sing |publisher=CASE Center for Social and Economic Research |access-date=19 December 2018 |pages=11 |date=June 2012}}</ref> The need to finance trade deficit weakens currency, making exports automatically more attractive in a country and abroad. A state in a monetary union cannot use weakening of currency to recover its international competitiveness. To achieve this a state has to reduce prices, including wages (]). This could result in high ] and lower incomes as it was during the ].<ref>{{cite journal |author1=] |title=The Failure of the Euro |journal=Foreign Affairs |date=January–February 2012 |url=https://www.nber.org/feldstein/fa121311.html |at=Chapter: Trading Places}}</ref> | |||
===A new reserve currency?=== | |||
The euro will probably become one of two, or perhaps three, major global ]. Currently, international currency exchange is dominated by the U.S. dollar (USD). The U.S. dollar is used by banks world-wide as a stable reserve on which to ensure their liquidity and international transactions and investments are often made in U.S. dollars. | |||
====Trade==== | |||
A currency is attractive for foreign transactions when it demonstrates a proven track record of stability, a well-developed financial market to dispose of the currency in, and proven acceptability to others. The euro will almost certainly be able to match these criteria at least as well as the U.S. dollar, so given some time to become accepted, it will likely begin to take its place alongside the dollar as one of the world’s major international currencies. | |||
The euro increased price transparency and stimulated cross-border trade.<ref name="Eichengreen-2019">{{Cite book|last=Eichengreen|first=Barry|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvd58rxg|title=Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System|date=2019|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-19390-8|edition=3rd|pages=212–213|doi=10.2307/j.ctvd58rxg |jstor=j.ctvd58rxg|s2cid=240840930 }}</ref> A 2009 consensus from the studies of the introduction of the euro concluded that it has increased trade within the eurozone by 5% to 10%,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.de/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp594.pdf |title=The euro's trade effects |access-date=2 October 2009}}</ref> and a ] of all available studies on the effect of introduction of the euro on increased trade suggests that the prevalence of positive estimates is caused by ] and that the underlying effect may be negligible.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone? |journal=Review of World Economics |doi=10.1007/s10290-010-0050-1 |volume=146 |issue=2 |pages=241–261|year=2010 |last1=Havránek |first1=Tomáš |s2cid=53585674 |url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00582634/file/PEER_stage2_10.1007%252Fs10290-010-0050-1.pdf }}</ref> Although a more recent meta-analysis shows that publication bias decreases over time and that there are positive trade effects from the introduction of the euro, as long as results from before 2010 are taken into account. This may be because of the inclusion of the ] and ongoing integration within the EU.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Polák|first=Petr|year=2019|title=The Euro's Trade Effect: A Meta-Analysis|url=https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/174189/1/wp_2016_22_polak.pdf |journal=Journal of Economic Surveys|volume=33|issue=1|pages=101–124|doi=10.1111/joes.12264|hdl=10419/174189|s2cid=157693449|issn=1467-6419|hdl-access=free}}</ref> Furthermore, older studies based on certain methods of analysis of main trends reflecting general cohesion policies in Europe that started before, and continue after implementing the common currency find no effect on trade.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Gomes|first1=Tamara|last2=Graham|first2=Chris|last3=Helliwel|first3=John|last4=Takashi|first4=Kano|last5=Murray|first5=John|last6=Schembri|first6=Lawrence|title=The Euro and Trade: Is there a Positive Effect?|url=http://www2.dse.unibo.it/soegw/paper/GomGraHelKanoMurrayS.pdf|publisher=Bank of Canada|date=August 2006|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150903222409/http://www2.dse.unibo.it/soegw/paper/GomGraHelKanoMurrayS.pdf|archive-date=3 September 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=H.|first1=Berger|last2=V.|first2=Nitsch|title=Zooming out: The trade effect of the euro in historical perspective|journal=Journal of International Money and Finance|volume=27|issue=8|pages=1244–1260 |doi=10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.07.005|year=2008|hdl=10419/18799|s2cid=53493723|url=https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp1435.pdf|hdl-access=free}}</ref> These results suggest that other policies aimed at European integration might be the source of observed increase in trade. According to Barry Eichengreen, studies disagree on the magnitude of the effect of the euro on trade, but they agree that it did have an effect.<ref name="Eichengreen-2019"/> | |||
====Investment==== | |||
There are several benefits to reserve currencies of being such an internationally acceptable currency. If the euro were to become a reserve currency it would benefit member countries by lowering the service charges on their ]s. Since the currency would be so broadly acceptable it would make the premiums paid to debt holders lower, since the risk to the borrower is lower. It is estimated that the United States government currently saves 10-15 billion dollars a year on 2 trillion dollars of international debt because of this principle. The issuer of the reserve currency is freer to pursue macroeconomic policy adjustments to suit its own needs in terms of financing its debt, or influencing other countries. Reserve status would also lower the cost of many commodities for Europeans. | |||
Physical investment seems to have increased by 5% in the eurozone due to the introduction.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eu-financial-system.org/fileadmin/content/Dokumente_Events/second_conference/Dvorak.pdf |title=The Impact of the Euro on Investment: Sectoral Evidence |access-date=2 October 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130831043539/http://www.eu-financial-system.org/fileadmin/content/Dokumente_Events/second_conference/Dvorak.pdf |archive-date=31 August 2013 }}</ref> Regarding foreign direct investment, a study found that the intra-eurozone FDI stocks have increased by about 20% during the first four years of the EMU.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.afse.fr/docs/congres_2005/docs2005/Sousa.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061210053621/http://www.afse.fr/docs/congres_2005/docs2005/Sousa.pdf |archive-date=10 December 2006 |title=Does the single currency affect FDI? |publisher=AFSE.fr |access-date=30 May 2010 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Concerning the effect on corporate investment, there is evidence that the introduction of the euro has resulted in an increase in investment rates and that it has made it easier for firms to access financing in Europe. The euro has most specifically stimulated investment in companies that come from countries that previously had weak currencies. A study found that the introduction of the euro accounts for 22% of the investment rate after 1998 in countries that previously had a weak currency.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www2.wu-wien.ac.at/rof/papers/pdf/Bris-Koskinen-Nilsson_Euro%20Effects.pdf |title=The Real Effects of the Euro: Evidence from Corporate Investments |access-date=30 May 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706085845/http://www2.wu-wien.ac.at/rof/papers/pdf/Bris-Koskinen-Nilsson_Euro%20Effects.pdf |archive-date=6 July 2011 }}</ref> | |||
=== |
====Inflation==== | ||
] | |||
The Eurozone consumes more imported ] than the US. This would mean that more euros than US dollars would flow into the ] nations, but oil is priced by those nations in US dollars only. There have been frequent discussions at OPEC about pricing oil in euros, which would have various effects, among them, requiring nations to hold stores of euros to buy oil, rather than the US dollars that they hold now. ] under ] has been a vocal proponent of this scheme, despite selling most of its own oil to the United States. Another proponent was ] of ], which held the world's second largest oil reserves. Since 2000 Iraq had used the euro as oil export currency. In 2002, Iraq changed its US dollars into euros, a few months prior to the ]. If implemented by OPEC, the changeover to the euro would be a transfer of a ']' that presently subsidises the United States to subsidise the European Union instead. Another effect would be that the price of oil in the Eurozone would more closely follow the world price. When oil prices skyrocketed to almost 50 USD/barrel in August 2004, the oil price in euros didn't change nearly as much because of the concurrent rise in the exchange rate of the euro to the US dollar (to an exchange rate of EUR 1.00 = USD 1.33 in December 2004). Similarly, should oil prices lower significantly, together with the USD/EUR exchange rate, the oil price in the Eurozone would not fall as much. On the other hand, if the exchange rate and the oil price move in different directions, oil price changes are magnified. Pricing oil in euros would nullify this dependency of European oil prices on the USD/EUR exchange rate. | |||
The introduction of the euro has led to extensive discussion about its possible effect on inflation. In the short term, there was a widespread impression in the population of the eurozone that the introduction of the euro had led to an increase in prices, but this impression was not confirmed by general indices of inflation and other studies.<ref>{{Cite journal|author = Paolo Angelini |author2=Francesco Lippi | title = Did Prices Really Soar after the Euro Cash Changeover? Evidence from ATM Withdrawals | journal = International Journal of Central Banking | date = December 2007 | url = http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb07q4a1.pdf | access-date =23 August 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Querschnittsveroeffentlichungen/WirtschaftStatistik/Preise/EuroBargeldeinfuehrung,property=file.pdf| title = Fünf Jahre nach der Euro-Bargeldeinführung –War der Euro wirklich ein Teuro?|trans-title=Five years after the introduction of euro cash – Did the euro really make things more expensive?| author = Irmtraud Beuerlein| publisher = Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden| language = de| access-date =23 August 2011}}</ref> A study of this paradox found that this was due to an asymmetric effect of the introduction of the euro on prices: while it had no effect on most goods, it had an effect on cheap goods which have seen their price round up after the introduction of the euro. The study found that consumers based their beliefs on inflation of those cheap goods which are frequently purchased.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121658067/abstract |archive-url=https://wayback.archive-it.org/all/20171011040045/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00189.x/abstract |url-status=dead |archive-date=11 October 2017 |title=The Euro Changeover and Its Effects on Price Transparency and Inflation |access-date=12 November 2010|doi=10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00189.x|volume=41|journal=Journal of Money, Credit and Banking|pages=101–129|year=2009 |last1=Dziuda |first1=Wioletta |last2=Mastrobuoni |first2=Giovanni |issue=1 }}</ref> It has also been suggested that the jump in small prices may be because prior to the introduction, retailers made fewer upward adjustments and waited for the introduction of the euro to do so.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1162/qjec.121.3.1103 |title=Quarterly Journal of Economics – Abstract |journal=Quarterly Journal of Economics |volume=121 |issue=3 |pages=1103–1131 |year=2006 |last1=Hobijn |first1=Bart |last2=Ravenna |first2=Federico |last3=Tambalotti |first3=Andrea |url=https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/60548/1/477453724.pdf }}</ref> Based on the ] in 2023, the ECB argues that inflation due to a change of currency is a one-time effect of limited impact.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/blog/date/2023/html/ecb.blog.230307~1669dec988.en.html |title=Has the euro changeover really caused extra inflation in Croatia |date=2023-03-07 |access-date=2024-05-05 |website=ECB |last1=Falagiarda |first1=Matteo |last2=Gartner |first2=Christine |last3=Mužić |first3=Ivan |last4=Pufnik |first4=Andreja}}</ref> | |||
====Exchange rate risk==== | |||
In 2006, ] announced its plans to open an ] for the express purpose of trading oil priced in other currencies, including ]s. | |||
One of the advantages of the adoption of a common currency is the reduction of the risk associated with changes in currency exchange rates.<ref name="Eichengreen-2019"/> It has been found that the introduction of the euro created "significant reductions in market risk exposures for nonfinancial firms both in and outside Europe".<ref>{{cite journal |title=The impact of the introduction of the Euro on foreign exchange rate risk exposures |journal=Journal of Empirical Finance |doi=10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.01.002 |volume=13 |issue=4–5 |pages=519–549|year=2006 |last1=Bartram |first1=Söhnke M. |last2=Karolyi |first2=G. Andrew }}</ref> These reductions in market risk "were concentrated in firms domiciled in the eurozone and in non-euro firms with a high fraction of foreign sales or assets in Europe". | |||
====Financial integration==== | |||
==Euro exchange rate== | |||
The introduction of the euro increased financial integration within Europe, which helped stimulate growth of a European ] (bond markets are characterized by ] dynamics).<ref name="Eichengreen-2019"/> According to a study on this question, it has "significantly reshaped the European financial system, especially with respect to the securities markets However, the real and policy barriers to integration in the retail and corporate banking sectors remain significant, even if the wholesale end of banking has been largely integrated."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tcd.ie/iiis/documents/discussion/pdfs/iiisdp139.pdf |title=The Euro and Financial Integration|date=May 2006 |access-date=2 October 2009}}</ref> Specifically, the euro has significantly decreased the cost of trade in bonds, equity, and banking assets within the eurozone.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The geography of asset trade and the euro: Insiders and outsiders |journal=Journal of the Japanese and International Economies |doi=10.1016/j.jjie.2008.11.001 |volume=23 |issue=2 |pages=90–113|year=2009 |last1=Coeurdacier |first1=Nicolas |last2=Martin |first2=Philippe |s2cid=55948853 |url=http://www.cepremap.fr/depot/docweb/docweb0701.pdf }}</ref> On a global level, there is evidence that the introduction of the euro has led to an integration in terms of investment in bond portfolios, with eurozone countries lending and borrowing more between each other than with other countries.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lane |first1=Philip R. |title=Global Bond Portfolios and EMU |journal=International Journal of Central Banking |date=June 2006 |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=1–23 |url=https://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb06q2a1.htm |citeseerx=10.1.1.365.4579 }}</ref> Financial integration made it cheaper for European companies to borrow.<ref name="Eichengreen-2019"/> Banks, firms and households could also invest more easily outside of their own country, thus creating greater international risk-sharing.<ref name="Eichengreen-2019"/> | |||
===Flexible exchange rates=== | |||
One of the implications of the ] is the fact that when an economy combines international capital mobility with monetary autonomy, it cannot at the same time maintain a fixed exchange rate (as increasing the ] would result in a ] of the currency). In the years following the ] the EU has liberalized its capital markets, and as the ] has chosen for monetary autonomy, the ] of the euro is flexible or ]. In other words, the ECB does not use the exchange rate instrument and in general does not intervene on the foreign exchange rate markets. This explains why the exchange rate of the euro vis-à-vis other currencies is characterized by strong fluctuations. Most notable are the fluctuations of the euro vs. the US dollar, another freely floating currency. | |||
=== |
====Effect on interest rates==== | ||
] | |||
[[Image:Euro exchange rate to USD, JPY, and GBP.png|thumb|right|350px||Exchange rate evolution of the euro compared to USD, JPY and GBP. Exchange rate at start is put to 1. | |||
<br>Green: in Jan-1999: 1 € = 1.18 USD ; in May-2006: 1 € = 1.28 USD | |||
<br>Red: in Jan-1999: 1 € = 133 JPY ; in May-2006: 1 € = 144 JPY | |||
<br>Blue: in Jan-1999: 1 € = 0.71 GBP ; in May-2006: 1 € = 0.68 GBP ]] | |||
After the introduction of the euro, its exchange rate against other currencies, especially the US dollar, declined heavily. At its introduction in 1999, the euro was traded at USD1.18; on ] ], it fell to an all time low of $0.8228 per euro. It then began what at the time was thought to be a recovery; by the beginning of 2001 it had risen to nearly $0.96. It declined again, although less than previously, reaching a low of $0.8344 on ] ] before commencing a steady appreciation. The two currencies reached parity on ] ], and by the end of 2002 the euro had reached $1.04 as it climbed further. | |||
As of January 2014, and since the introduction of the euro, interest rates of most member countries (particularly those with a weak currency) have decreased. Some of these countries had the most serious sovereign financing problems. | |||
On ] ], the euro surpassed its initial ($1.18=€1.00) trading value for the first time. At the end of 2004, it had reached a peak of $1.3668 per euro (€0.7316 per $) as the US dollar fell against all major currencies. At that time, some analysts expected the dollar to continue to fall, a few even suggesting $1.60 per euro by the end of 2005, fuelled by the so called twin deficit of the US accounts. However, the dollar recovered in 2005, rising to $1.18 per euro (€0.85 per $) in July 2005 (and stable throughout the second half of 2005). The fast increase in US interest rates during 2005 had much to do with this trend. | |||
The effect of declining interest rates, combined with excess liquidity continually provided by the ECB, made it easier for banks within the countries in which interest rates fell the most, and their linked sovereigns, to borrow significant amounts (above the 3% of GDP budget deficit imposed on the eurozone initially) and significantly inflate their public and private debt levels.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.investmentweek.co.uk/investment-week/opinion/2076100/redwood-origins-euro-crisis |title=Redwood: The origins of the euro crisis |publisher=Investmentweek.co.uk |date=3 June 2011 |access-date=16 September 2011}}</ref> Following the ], governments in these countries found it necessary to bail out or nationalise their privately held banks to prevent systemic failure of the banking system when underlying hard or financial asset values were found to be grossly inflated and sometimes so nearly worthless there was no liquid market for them.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ip-global.org/2011/02/01/farewell-fair-weather-euro/ |title=Farewell, Fair-Weather Euro | IP – Global-Edition |publisher=Ip-global.org |access-date=16 September 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110317161013/http://www.ip-global.org/2011/02/01/farewell-fair-weather-euro/ |archive-date=17 March 2011 }}</ref> This further increased the already high levels of public debt to a level the markets began to consider unsustainable, via increasing government bond interest rates, producing the ongoing European sovereign-debt crisis. | |||
By mid-2006, the euro had risen to $1.28. | |||
====Price convergence==== | |||
* | |||
The evidence on the convergence of prices in the eurozone with the introduction of the euro is mixed. Several studies failed to find any evidence of convergence following the introduction of the euro after a phase of convergence in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.ecb.eu/events/pdf/conferences/emu/sessionV_Angeloni_Paper.pdf |title=Price setting and inflation dynamics: did EMU matter |access-date=13 March 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725112443/http://www.ecb.eu/events/pdf/conferences/emu/sessionV_Angeloni_Paper.pdf |archive-date=25 July 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://opus.zbw-kiel.de/volltexte/2009/7575/pdf/200906dkp.pdf |title=Price convergence in the EMU? Evidence from micro data |access-date=2 October 2009}}</ref> Other studies have found evidence of price convergence,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://faculty.london.edu/hrey/IMRRtele.pdf |title=One TV, One Price? |access-date=17 July 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/835/1/MPRA_paper_835.pdf |title=One Market, One Money, One Price? |access-date=17 July 2011}}</ref> in particular for cars.<ref>Gil-Pareja, Salvador, and Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, , FEDEA, November 2005.</ref> A possible reason for the divergence between the different studies is that the processes of convergence may not have been linear, slowing down substantially between 2000 and 2003, and resurfacing after 2003 as suggested by a recent study (2009).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/hepdoc/macppr_4_2009.pdf |first1=Ulrich |last1=Fritsche |first2=Sarah |last2=Lein |first3=Sebastian |last3=Weber |title=Do Prices in the EMU Converge (Non-linearly)? |publisher=University of Hamburg, Department Economics and Politics Discussion Papers, Macroeconomics and Finance Series |date=April 2009 |access-date=28 December 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719105515/http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/hepdoc/macppr_4_2009.pdf |archive-date=19 July 2011 }}</ref> | |||
* | |||
* | |||
====Tourism==== | |||
===Currencies pegged to the euro=== | |||
A study suggests that the introduction of the euro has had a positive effect on the amount of tourist travel within the EMU, with an increase of 6.5%.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gil-Pareja|first1=Salvador|last2=Llorca-Vivero|first2=Rafael|last3=Martínez-Serrano|first3=José|title=The Effect of EMU on Tourism|ssrn=983231|journal=Review of International Economics |volume=15 |issue=2 |pages=302–312 |date=May 2007|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00620.x|s2cid=154503069}}</ref> | |||
{{main|Currencies related to the euro}} | |||
==Exchange rates== | |||
There are a number of foreign currencies that were pegged to a European currency and are now currencies related to the euro: the ], the ], the ], the ], the ] and the ]. | |||
===Flexible exchange rates=== | |||
The ECB targets ]s rather than ]s and in general, does not intervene on the foreign exchange rate markets. This is because of the implications of the ], which implies a central bank cannot (without ]s) maintain interest rate and exchange rate targets simultaneously, because increasing the ] results in a ] of the currency. In the years following the ], the EU has liberalised its capital markets and, as the ECB has ] as its ], the exchange-rate regime of the euro is ]. | |||
In total, the euro is the official currency in 15 states and territories outside the European Union. In addition, 22 states and territories have a national currency that are directly pegged to the euro including fourteen West African countries, three French Pacific territories, two African island countries and three Balkan countries. | |||
===Against other major currencies=== | |||
===Drivers=== | |||
Part of the euro's strength in the period 2001-2004 was thought to be due to more attractive ] rates in Europe than in the United States. The US ] had maintained lower rates than the ] for these years, despite key European economies, notably Germany, growing relatively slowly or not at all. This is attributed in part to the ECB's duty to check inflation across the Eurozone, which in high-performing countries such as ] is above the ECB's target. | |||
The euro is the second-most widely held ] after the U.S. dollar. After its introduction on 4 January 1999 its exchange rate against the other major currencies fell reaching its lowest exchange rates in 2000 (3 May vs ], 25 October vs the ], 26 October vs ]). Afterwards it regained and its exchange rate reached its historical highest point in 2008 (15 July vs US dollar, 23 July vs Japanese yen, 29 December vs sterling). With the advent of the global financial crisis the euro initially fell, to regain later. Despite pressure due to the ], the euro remained stable.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kirschbaum |first1=Erik |title=Schaeuble says markets have confidence in euro |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eurozone-schaeuble/schaeuble-says-markets-have-confidence-in-euro-idUSTRE77L0LK20110822 |access-date=28 March 2018}}</ref> In November 2011 the euro's exchange rate index – measured against currencies of the bloc's major trading partners – was trading almost two percent higher on the year, approximately at the same level as it was before the crisis began in 2007.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-markets-euro-mystery-idUKLNE7AE02520111115 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151230043335/http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-markets-euro-mystery-idUKLNE7AE02520111115 |url-status=dead |archive-date=30 December 2015 |title= Puzzle over euro's 'mysterious' stability |work=] |date= 15 November 2011}}</ref> In mid July 2022, the euro and the US dollar traded at par for a short period of time during an episode of dollar ].<ref name="NYTimes-2022" /> On 11 July 2024, it recorded a new high against the Japanese yen during a long period of ] of the latter.<ref>{{Cite web |last=日本放送協会 |date=2024-07-11 |title=円相場 対ユーロで最安値を更新 {{!}} NHK |url=https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240711/k10014509161000.html |access-date=2024-07-16 |website=NHKニュース}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-07 |title=Weekly Pairs in Focus - July 7 (Charts) |url=https://dailyforex.com/forex-technical-analysis/2024/07/pairs-in-focus-this-week-8th-july-13th-july-2024/214557 |access-date=2024-07-12 |website=DailyForex |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-01 |title=Japanese yen sinks to record low against euro |url=https://www.bastillepost.com/global/article/3958525/ |access-date=2024-07-01 |website=www.bastillepost.com}}</ref> | |||
However, although the interest rate differential formed part of the backdrop, the main ''a posteriori'' justification for the euro's continuing ascent against the dollar was the concern over the huge unsustainable US ] ]s. The market has been awash with concerns about the US ]s, which have been a key driver of dollar weakness. The US ] is about $427 ], or 3.7% of ] (GDP), while the current account—the broadest trade measure since it adds investment flows—hit a record $166.18bn shortfall in the second quarter of 2004. | |||
{{multiple image | |||
A key factor is that a number of Asian currencies are rising less against the dollar than is the euro. In the case of China, the ] was until recently pegged against the dollar, whilst the Japanese ] is supported by intervention (and the threat of it) by the ]. This means much of the pressure from a falling dollar is translated into a rising euro. | |||
| align = center | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| width = 310 | |||
| footer_align = center | |||
| footer = Euro exchange rate against US dollar (USD), sterling (GBP) and Japanese yen (JPY), starting from 1999. | |||
| image1 = Euro exchange rate to USD.svg | |||
| alt1 = | |||
| caption1 = | |||
| image2 = Euro exchange rate to GBP.svg | |||
| alt2 = | |||
| caption2 = | |||
| image3 = Euro exchange rate to JPY.svg | |||
| alt3 = | |||
| caption3 = | |||
}} | |||
*Current and historical exchange rates against 32 other currencies (European Central Bank): '''' | |||
The euro's climb from its lows began shortly after it was introduced as a cash currency. In the time between 1999 and 2002, ] believed that the weak euro was a sign that the euro experiment was doomed to fail. It may be that its weakness in this period was due to low confidence in a currency that did not exist in "real" form. While the overt conversion to notes and coins had not yet occurred, it remained possible that the project could fail. Once the euro became "real" in the sense of existing in the form of cash, confidence in the euro rose and the increasing perception that it was here to stay helped increase its value. This effect was probably significant in the euro's decline and recovery between 1999 and 2002, but other factors are more significant since then. | |||
{{Exchange Rate|EUR|SEK|PLN|style=navbox}} <!-- The major world currencies are included "as standard", so this list is just for the two major European currencies not on the default list. For other currencies, see the corresponding table at its article, which will give its rate v the euro. --> | |||
Another factor in the early decline of the euro was that many investors and ]s sold large portions of their legacy (national) currency holdings once the irrevocable exchange rates were set, as the goal of holding multiple currencies is to dampen losses when one currency falls. Once the exchange rates between Eurozone countries were pegged against each other, holdings in German ] and French ] (for example) became identical. There is also some reason to believe that significant sums of illegally held money were sold for dollars to avoid an official and public exchange for euros.{{citationneeded}} | |||
==Political considerations== | |||
===Consequences=== | |||
Besides the economic motivations to the introduction of the euro, its creation was also partly justified as a way to foster a closer sense of joint identity between European citizens. Statements about this goal were for instance made by ], European Central Bank Governor, in 1998,<ref>{{cite book |title=Global Finance After the Crisis|date= 2013|quote=The euro is far more than a medium of exchange. It is part of the identity of a people. It reflects what they have in common now and in the future.}}</ref> ], French Finance Minister, in 2000,<ref>{{cite news |newspaper=Financial Times|date=24 July 2000|quote=Thanks to the euro, our pockets will soon hold solid evidence of a European identity|title=European identity}}</ref> and ], President of the European Commission, in 2002.<ref>{{cite book|title=Speech to the European Parliament|date=16 January 2002 |quote=The euro is becoming a key element in peoples sense of shared European identity and common destiny.}}</ref> However, 15 years after the introduction of the euro, a study found no evidence that it has had any effect on a shared sense of European identity.<ref name=EER>{{cite journal |author1=Franz Buscha |title=Can a common currency foster a shared social identity across different nations? The case of the euro|journal=European Economic Review|date=November 2017 |volume=100 |pages=318–336 |url=http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/19659/1/EU_identity_V17_EER_revisions_2ndRound.pdf |doi=10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.08.011|s2cid=102510742 }}</ref> | |||
Despite the euro's rise in US-dollar-denominated value, as well as those of other major and minor currencies, the US trade deficits continue to rise. Economic theory would suggest that a fall in the dollar and a rise in the euro should lead to an increase in US exports and a decline in US imports, as the former becomes cheaper and the latter more expensive. However, this depends to some extent on how currency costs are passed down the supply chain. Furthermore, the declining dollar makes foreign investment in the US cheaper (although also reducing the return), so that continuing foreign investment may underpin the dollar to some extent. | |||
Public support of Euro by country according to ] 2024:<ref name="i768">{{cite report | title=Public opinion in the European Union: first results : report. | date=2024 | publisher=Publications Office of the European Union | doi=10.2775/437940 | url=https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/437940 | page = 26 | author1=European Commission. Directorate General for Communication. }}</ref> | |||
The role of the US dollar as the world's ] reserve currency helps support both the US dollar and the US budget deficit — but it depends on the continued willingness of foreigners to finance both. Central banks and others finance the budget by acquiring newly-issued, dollar-denominated US government bonds, which they need to acquire dollars for. If at some point foreigners become unwilling to accept new bonds at the prevailing interest rate (perhaps because the falling dollar is reducing the bonds' value too much), the dollar will fall even more — or the US will have to raise interest rates, which would reduce economic growth. | |||
{{Sticky header}} | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable sticky-header" | |||
! Country !! For % !! Against % | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Austria}} || 66 || 27 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Belgium}} || 82 || 15 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Bulgaria}} || 37 || 47 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Croatia}} || 71 || 24 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Cyprus}} || 80 || 16 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Czech Republic}} || 30 || 62 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Denmark}} || 34 || 58 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Estonia}} || 90 || 8 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Finland}} || 90 || 7 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|France}} || 74 || 20 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Germany}} || 81 || 14 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Greece}} || 80 || 16 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Hungary}} || 65 || 28 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Ireland}} || 88 || 7 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Italy}} || 70 || 23 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Latvia}} || 85 || 8 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Lithuania}} || 78 || 15 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Luxembourg}} || 90 || 8 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Malta}} || 89 || 8 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Netherlands}} || 84 || 13 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Poland}} || 36 || 51 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Portugal}} || 81 || 13 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Romania}} || 54 || 37 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Slovakia}} || 86 || 8 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Slovenia}} || 92 || 7 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Spain}} || 83 || 11 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flaglist|Sweden}} || 37 || 56 | |||
|} | |||
==''Euro'' in various official EU languages== | |||
There is speculation that the strength of the euro relative to the US dollar might encourage the use of the euro as an alternative ]; ]'s ] switched its currency reserves from US dollars to euros in 2000. Moves by central banks with major reserve currency holdings such as those of ] or ] to switch some of their reserves from US dollars to euros, or even of ] countries to switch the currency they trade in from US dollars to euros, will further reinforce the US dollar's decline. In 2004, the ] reported the proportion of bank deposits held in euros rising to 20%, from 12% in 2001, and it is continuously rising. The falling dollar also raises returns for US investors from investing in foreign stocks, encouraging a switch which further depresses the dollar. | |||
{{Main|Language and the euro}} | |||
The formal titles of the currency are ''euro'' for the major unit and ''cent'' for the minor (one-hundredth) unit and for official use in most eurozone languages; according to the ECB, all languages should use the same spelling for the nominative singular.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/conrep/cr200705en.pdf|title=European Central Bank, Convergence Report|date= May 2007|quote=The euro is the single currency of the member states that have adopted it. To make this singleness apparent, Community law requires a single spelling of the word ''euro'' in the nominative singular case in all community and national legislative provisions, taking into account the existence of different alphabets.|access-date=29 December 2008}}</ref> This may contradict normal rules for word formation in some languages. | |||
Bulgaria has negotiated an exception; ''euro'' in the Bulgarian Cyrillic alphabet is spelled {{lang|bg|eвро}} ({{transliteration|bg|evro}}) and not {{script|Cyrl|eуро}} (''{{transliteration|Cyrl|euro}}'') in all official documents.<ref>{{cite news|author=Elena Koinova |url=http://sofiaecho.com/2007/10/19/656777_evro-dispute-over-portuguese-foreign-minister |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110603212303/http://sofiaecho.com/2007/10/19/656777_evro-dispute-over-portuguese-foreign-minister |archive-date=3 June 2011 |url-status=dead |title="Evro" Dispute Over – Portuguese Foreign Minister – Bulgaria |newspaper=The Sofia Echo |date=19 October 2007 |access-date=17 July 2011}}</ref> In the Greek script the term {{lang|el|ευρώ}} ({{transliteration|el|evró}}) is used; the Greek "cent" coins are denominated in {{lang|el|λεπτό/ά}} ({{transliteration|el|leptó/á}}). Official practice for English-language EU legislation is to use the words euro and cent as both singular and plural,<ref>European Commission. "Spelling of the words "euro" and "cent" in official community languages as used in community legislative acts" (PDF). Retrieved 12 January 2009.</ref> although the European Commission's ] states that the plural forms ''euros'' and ''cents'' should be used in English.<ref>For example, see {{Cite web |publisher=European Commission Directorate-General for Translation |title=English Style Guide |at=para.{{nbsp}}20.8 |quote=''The euro.'' Like 'pound', 'dollar' or any other currency name in English, the word 'euro' is written in lower case with no initial capital and, where appropriate, takes the plural 's' (as does 'cent'). |url=http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/style_guides/english/style_guide_en.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101205092625/http://ec.europa.eu/translation/writing/style_guides/english/style_guide_en.pdf |archive-date=5 December 2010 |date=29 June 2010}}</ref> | |||
The rise in the euro should dampen Eurozone exports, but there is little sign of this happening yet. The main reason is that the currencies of the Eurozone's major world-wide customers are also seeing their currencies rise relative to the US dollar. As the current account deficits continue to rise and the US plans no austerity measures to curb foreign imports and increase exports, the situation may cause the US dollar to lose its position as a hegemonic currency replaced by either the euro or the euro and a basket of currencies. | |||
The word 'euro' is pronounced differently according to pronunciation rules in the individual languages applied; in German {{IPA|de|ˈɔʏʁo|}}, in English {{IPAc-en|ˈ|j|ʊər|oʊ}}, in French {{IPA|fr|øʁo|}}, etc. | |||
<!-- Advice to editors: this paragraph is intended to be just a summary. If you wish to add material, please consider using the "Linguistic issues" article to do so.--> | |||
In summary: | |||
{{Exchange Rate|EUR|date=9 June 2006|rate= | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
€ 1 = 1.26469 ]<br/> | |||
! Language(s) | |||
1 ] = € 1.45800<br/> | |||
! Name | |||
€ 1 = 10.1383 ]<br/> | |||
! ] | |||
€ 1 = 144.004 ]<br/> | |||
|- | |||
€ 1 = 1.55788 ]<br/> | |||
| ] | |||
€ 1 = 1.41598 ]<br/> | |||
| euro | |||
€ 1 = 34.1581 ]}} | |||
| {{IPA|hr|ěuro|lang}}, {{IPA|cs|ˈɛuro|lang}}, {{IPA|da|ˈœwʁo|lang}}, {{IPA|nl|ˈøːroː|lang}}, {{IPA|et|ˈeu̯ro|lang}}, {{IPA|fi|ˈeu̯ro|lang}}, {{IPA|fr|øʁo|lang}}, {{IPA|it|ˈɛuro|lang}}, {{IPA|pl|ˈɛwrɔ|lang}}, {{IPA|pt|ˈewɾɔ|lang}} or {{IPA|pt|ˈewɾu|}}, {{IPA|sk|ˈewrɔ|lang}}, {{IPA|es|ˈewɾo|lang}} | |||
|- | |||
==Name and linguistic issues== | |||
| ] | |||
{{main|Linguistic issues concerning the euro}} | |||
| {{lang|bg|евро}} ''evro'' | |||
| {{IPA|bg|ˈɛvro|lang}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|de|Euro}} | |||
| {{IPA|de|ˈɔʏʁo|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|el|ευρώ}} ''evró'' | |||
| {{IPA|el|eˈvro|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|hu|euró}} | |||
| {{IPA|hu|ˈɛuroː|}} or {{IPA|hu|ˈɛu̯roː|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| ''euro'' or {{lang|lv|eiro}} | |||
| {{IPA|lv|ɛìro|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|lt|euras}} | |||
| {{IPA|lt|ˈɛʊrɐs|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|mt|ewro}} | |||
| {{IPA|mt|ˈɛwrɔ|}} | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| {{lang|sl|evro}} | |||
| {{IPA|sl|ˈéːʋrɔ|}} | |||
|} | |||
For local phonetics, cent, use of plural and amount formatting (€6,00 or 6.00 €), see ]. | |||
Several ] issues have arisen in relation to the spelling of the words ''euro'' and ''cent'' in the many languages of the member states of the European Union, as well as in relation to ] and the formation of ]. Immutable word formations have been encouraged by the European Commission in usage with official EU ] (originally in order to ensure uniform presentation on the banknotes), but the "unofficial" practice concerning the mutability (or not) of the words differs between the member states and their languages. The subject has led to much debate and controversy. <!-- advice to editors: this paragraph is intended to be just a summary. If you wish to add material, please consider using the "Linguistic issues" article to do so. --> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ], '']'' | |||
===Euro related=== | |||
*] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] (EMU) | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*], ] and ]. | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] |
* ] | ||
* ] | |||
*], a benchmark for money market in the Eurozone. | |||
* ] | |||
*], an effective overnight reference rate for the euro. | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
* ] | |||
*] | |||
*] is an agreement by ] member states related to their conduct of ], to facilitate and maintain ]. | |||
*] | |||
== |
== Notes == | ||
{{NoteFoot}} | |||
*] '''(1865–1927)''' | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
*] | |||
*], a proposed ] currency union. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
*Baldwin, Richard and Charles Wyplosz, ''The Economics of European Integration'', New York: McGraw Hill, 2004. | |||
*European Commission, ''High Level Task Force on Skills and Mobility - Final Report'', ] ]. | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{cite journal |author2=Taylor, Stephen J. |author3=Wang, Yaw-Huei |date=May 2007 |title=The Euro and European Financial Market Dependence |journal=Journal of Banking and Finance |volume=51 |issue=5 |pages=1461–1481 |doi= 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.014|ssrn=924333 |last1=Bartram |first1=Söhnke M. |url=http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/news/agent_contract.pdf}} | |||
* {{cite journal |author2=Karolyi, G. Andrew |date=October 2006 |title=The Impact of the Introduction of the Euro on Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Exposures |journal=Journal of Empirical Finance |volume=13 |issue=4–5 |pages=519–549 |doi= 10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.01.002|ssrn=299641 |last1=Bartram |first1=Söhnke M.}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Baldwin |first1=Richard |first2=Charles |last2=Wyplosz |title=The Economics of European Integration |location=New York |publisher=McGraw Hill |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-07-710394-1}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last1=Buti |first1=Marco |first2=Servaas |last2=Deroose |first3=Vitor |last3=Gaspar |first4=João |last4=Nogueira Martins |title=The Euro |location=Cambridge |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-92-79-09842-0}} | |||
* {{cite web|last=Jordan|first=Helmuth|year=2010|url=http://dorrance.stores.yahoo.net/feeurzufleuk.html|title=Fehlschlag Euro|publisher=Dorrance Publishing|access-date=28 January 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100916233209/http://dorrance.stores.yahoo.net/feeurzufleuk.html|archive-date=16 September 2010|url-status=dead}} | |||
*{{cite book|last1=Simonazzi|first1=A. |last2=Vianello |first2=F. |chapter=Financial Liberalization, the European Single Currency and the Problem of Unemployment |editor1-last=Franzini |editor1-first=R. |editor2-last=Pizzuti |editor2-first=R.F.|title=Globalization, Institutions and Social Cohesion|date=2001|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-540-67741-3}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Sister project links}} | |||
{{commons|euro}} | |||
* | |||
*{{languageicon|20 languages}} '''''' | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
*The of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Translation. See section 20.7 for the recommendation that in all non-legal texts, "especially documents intended for the general public, use the natural plurals ‘euros’ and ‘cents’." | |||
{{Euro topics}} | |||
===Articles=== | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
* | |||
|list1= | |||
* | |||
{{European Union topics}} | |||
* | |||
{{Currencies of Europe}} | |||
* | |||
{{Currencies of Africa}} | |||
* | |||
{{Currencies of the Americas}} | |||
* (]; including "The plural of euro is euros!" as well as a discussion on what the words for "euro" and "cent" should be in ]) | |||
{{Currencies of Asia}} | |||
* | |||
{{Charlemagne Prize recipients}} | |||
* | |||
}} | |||
* | |||
{{Portal bar|European Union|Money|Numismatics}} | |||
* | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
===Books=== | |||
* | |||
{{PreEuroCurrencies}} | |||
{{EuropeanCurrencies}} | |||
]<!--please leave the empty space as standard--> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
<!-- The below are interlanguage links. --> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 12 January 2025
Currency of the European Union This article is about the currency. For other uses, see Euro (disambiguation). "EUR" redirects here. For other uses, see EUR (disambiguation).
see also euro in various languages | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
ISO 4217 | |||||
Code | EUR (numeric: 978) | ||||
Subunit | 0.01 | ||||
Unit | |||||
Unit | euro | ||||
Plural | Varies, see language and the euro | ||||
Symbol | € | ||||
Nickname | The single currency | ||||
Denominations | |||||
Subunit | |||||
1⁄100 | euro cent (Name varies by language) | ||||
Plural | |||||
euro cent | (Varies by language) | ||||
Symbol | |||||
euro cent | c | ||||
Banknotes | |||||
Freq. used | €5, €10, €20, €50, €100, €200 | ||||
Rarely used | €500 | ||||
Coins | |||||
Freq. used | 1c, 2c, 5c, 10c, 20c, 50c, €1, €2 | ||||
Rarely used | 1c, 2c (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Slovakia) | ||||
Demographics | |||||
Date of introduction | 1 January 1999; 26 years ago (1999-01-01) | ||||
Replaced | European Currency Unit | ||||
User(s) | primary: § members of Eurozone (20), also: § other users | ||||
Issuance | |||||
Central bank | European Central Bank | ||||
Website | www | ||||
Printer | see § Banknote printing | ||||
Mint | List of mints | ||||
Valuation | |||||
Inflation | 2.2% (November 2024) | ||||
Source | ec.europa.eu | ||||
Method | HICP | ||||
Pegged by | see § Pegged currencies |
The euro (symbol: €; currency code: EUR) is the official currency of 20 of the 27 member states of the European Union. This group of states is officially known as the euro area or, more commonly, the eurozone. The euro is divided into 100 euro cents.
The currency is also used officially by the institutions of the European Union, by four European microstates that are not EU members, the British Overseas Territory of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, as well as unilaterally by Montenegro and Kosovo. Outside Europe, a number of special territories of EU members also use the euro as their currency. Additionally, over 200 million people worldwide use currencies pegged to the euro.
The euro is the second-largest reserve currency as well as the second-most traded currency in the world after the United States dollar. As of December 2019, with more than €1.3 trillion in circulation, the euro has one of the highest combined values of banknotes and coins in circulation in the world.
The name euro was officially adopted on 16 December 1995 in Madrid. The euro was introduced to world financial markets as an accounting currency on 1 January 1999, replacing the former European Currency Unit (ECU) at a ratio of 1:1 (US$1.1743 at the time). Physical euro coins and banknotes entered into circulation on 1 January 2002, making it the day-to-day operating currency of its original members, and by March 2002 it had completely replaced the former currencies.
Between December 1999 and December 2002, the euro traded below the US dollar, but has since traded near parity with or above the US dollar, peaking at US$1.60 on 18 July 2008 and since then returning near to its original issue rate. On 13 July 2022, the two currencies hit parity for the first time in nearly two decades due in part to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Then, in September 2022, the US dollar again had a face value higher than the Euro, at around US dollar 0.95 per euro.
Characteristics
Administration
Main articles: European Central Bank, Maastricht Treaty, and EurogroupThe euro is managed and administered by the European Central Bank and the Eurosystem, composed of the central banks of the eurozone countries. As an independent central bank, the ECB has sole authority to set monetary policy. The Eurosystem participates in the printing, minting and distribution of euro banknotes and coins in all member states, and the operation of the eurozone payment systems.
The 1992 Maastricht Treaty obliges most EU member states to adopt the euro upon meeting certain monetary and budgetary convergence criteria, although not all participating states have done so. Denmark has negotiated exemptions, while Sweden (which joined the EU in 1995, after the Maastricht Treaty was signed) turned down the euro in a 2003 non-binding referendum, and has circumvented the obligation to adopt the euro by not meeting the monetary and budgetary requirements. All nations that have joined the EU since 1993 have pledged to adopt the euro in due course. The Maastricht Treaty was amended by the 2001 Treaty of Nice, which closed the gaps and loopholes in the Maastricht and Rome Treaties.
Countries that use the euro
Further information: Euro § Direct and indirect usageEurozone members
Main article: EurozoneThe 20 participating members are
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Estonia
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Latvia
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Malta
- Netherlands
- Portugal
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- Spain
Special territories of members of the European Economic Area
Special Autonomous Territories:
Other users
Microstates with a monetary agreement:
Unilateral adopters:
EU members not using the euro
Main article: Enlargement of the eurozone
Committed to adopt the euro
See also: Bulgaria and the euro, Czech Republic and the euro, Hungary and the euro, Poland and the euro, Romania and the euro, and Sweden and the euroThe following EU member states committed themselves in their respective Treaty of Accession to adopt the euro. However they do not have a deadline to do so and can delay the process by deliberately not complying with the convergence criteria (such as by not meeting the convergence criteria to join ERM II). Bulgaria and Romania are actively working to adopt the euro, while the remaining states do not have a migration plan in progress.
- Bulgaria: The Bulgarian government aims to replace the Bulgarian lev with the euro by 2026. In November 2023, Bulgarian euro coin design has been revealed and approved by the Bulgarian National Bank.
- Czech Republic
- Hungary
- Poland
- Romania
- Sweden
Opt-out
See also: Denmark and the euroCoins and banknotes
Coins
Main article: Euro coinsThe euro is divided into 100 cents (also referred to as euro cents, especially when distinguishing them from other currencies, and referred to as such on the common side of all cent coins). In Community legislative acts the plural forms of euro and cent are spelled without the s, notwithstanding normal English usage. Otherwise, normal English plurals are used, with many local variations such as centime in France.
All circulating coins have a common side showing the denomination or value, and a map in the background. Due to the linguistic plurality in the European Union, the Latin alphabet version of euro is used (as opposed to the less common Greek or Cyrillic) and Arabic numerals (other text is used on national sides in national languages, but other text on the common side is avoided). For the denominations except the 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins, the map only showed the 15 member states of the union as of 2002. Beginning in 2007 or 2008 (depending on the country), the old map was replaced by a map of Europe also showing countries outside the EU. The 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins, however, keep their old design, showing a geographical map of Europe with the EU member states as of 2002, raised somewhat above the rest of the map. All common sides were designed by Luc Luycx. The coins also have a national side showing an image specifically chosen by the country that issued the coin. Euro coins from any member state may be freely used in any nation that has adopted the euro.
The coins are issued in denominations of €2, €1, 50c, 20c, 10c, 5c, 2c, and 1c. To avoid the use of the two smallest coins, some cash transactions are rounded to the nearest five cents in the Netherlands and Ireland (by voluntary agreement) and in Finland and Italy (by law). This practice is discouraged by the commission, as is the practice of certain shops of refusing to accept high-value euro notes.
Commemorative coins with €2 face value have been issued with changes to the design of the national side of the coin. These include both commonly issued coins, such as the €2 commemorative coin for the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Rome, and nationally issued coins, such as the coin to commemorate the 2004 Summer Olympics issued by Greece. These coins are legal tender throughout the eurozone. Collector coins with various other denominations have been issued as well, but these are not intended for general circulation, and they are legal tender only in the member state that issued them.
Coin minting
A number of institutions are authorised to mint euro coins:
- Bayerisches Hauptmünzamt (Mint mark: D)
- Currency Centre
- Real Casa de la Moneda
- Hamburgische Münze (J)
- Hrvatska kovnica novca
- Banknote and Securities Printing Foundation [el]
- Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda
- Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato
- Koninklijke Munt van België/Monnaie Royale de Belgique
- Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt
- Lietuvos monetų kalykla
- Mincovňa Kremnica
- Monnaie de Paris
- Münze Österreich
- Suomen Rahapaja/Myntverket i Finland
- Staatliche Münze Berlin (A)
- Staatliche Münzen Baden-Württemberg (F): Stuttgart, (G): Karlsruhe
Banknotes
Main article: Euro banknotesThe design for the euro banknotes has common designs on both sides. The design was created by the Austrian designer Robert Kalina. Notes are issued in €500, €200, €100, €50, €20, €10, and €5. Each banknote has its own colour and is dedicated to an artistic period of European architecture. The front of the note features windows or gateways while the back has bridges, symbolising links between states in the union and with the future. While the designs are supposed to be devoid of any identifiable characteristics, the initial designs by Robert Kalina were of specific bridges, including the Rialto and the Pont de Neuilly, and were subsequently rendered more generic; the final designs still bear very close similarities to their specific prototypes; thus they are not truly generic. The monuments looked similar enough to different national monuments to please everyone.
The Europa series, or second series, consists of six denominations and no longer includes the €500 with issuance discontinued as of 27 April 2019. However, both the first and the second series of euro banknotes, including the €500, remain legal tender throughout the euro area.
In December 2021, the ECB announced its plans to redesign euro banknotes by 2024. A theme advisory group, made up of one member from each euro area country, was selected to submit theme proposals to the ECB. The proposals will be voted on by the public; a design competition will also be held.
Issuing modalities for banknotes
Since 1 January 2002, the national central banks (NCBs) and the ECB have issued euro banknotes on a joint basis. Eurosystem NCBs are required to accept euro banknotes put into circulation by other Eurosystem members and these banknotes are not repatriated. The ECB issues 8% of the total value of banknotes issued by the Eurosystem. In practice, the ECB's banknotes are put into circulation by the NCBs, thereby incurring matching liabilities vis-à-vis the ECB. These liabilities carry interest at the main refinancing rate of the ECB. The other 92% of euro banknotes are issued by the NCBs in proportion to their respective shares of the ECB capital key, calculated using national share of European Union (EU) population and national share of EU GDP, equally weighted.
Banknote printing
Member states are authorised to print or to commission bank note printing. As of November 2022, these are the printers:
- Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato
- Banco de Portugal
- Bank of Greece
- Bank of France
- Bundesdruckerei
- Central Bank of Ireland
- De La Rue
- Real Casa de la Moneda
- François-Charles Oberthür
- Giesecke+Devrient
- Royal Joh. Enschedé
- National Bank of Belgium
- Oesterreichische Nationalbank
- Setec Oy
Payments clearing, electronic funds transfer
Main article: Single Euro Payments AreaCapital within the EU may be transferred in any amount from one state to another. All intra-Union transfers in euro are treated as domestic transactions and bear the corresponding domestic transfer costs. This includes all member states of the EU, even those outside the eurozone providing the transactions are carried out in euro. Credit/debit card charging and ATM withdrawals within the eurozone are also treated as domestic transactions; however paper-based payment orders, like cheques, have not been standardised so these are still domestic-based. The ECB has also set up a clearing system, T2 since March 2023, for large euro transactions.
History
Main article: History of the euroIntroduction
Currency | Code | Rate | Fixed on | Yielded |
---|---|---|---|---|
Austrian schilling | ATS | 13.7603 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Belgian franc | BEF | 40.3399 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Dutch guilder | NLG | 2.20371 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Finnish markka | FIM | 5.94573 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
French franc | FRF | 6.55957 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
German mark | DEM | 1.95583 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Irish pound | IEP | 0.787564 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Italian lira | ITL | 1,936.27 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Luxembourg franc | LUF | 40.3399 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Portuguese escudo | PTE | 200.482 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Spanish peseta | ESP | 166.386 | 31 December 1998 | 1 January 1999 |
Greek drachma | GRD | 340.750 | 19 June 2000 | 1 January 2001 |
Slovenian tolar | SIT | 239.640 | 11 July 2006 | 1 January 2007 |
Cypriot pound | CYP | 0.585274 | 10 July 2007 | 1 January 2008 |
Maltese lira | MTL | 0.429300 | 10 July 2007 | 1 January 2008 |
Slovak koruna | SKK | 30.1260 | 8 July 2008 | 1 January 2009 |
Estonian kroon | EEK | 15.6466 | 13 July 2010 | 1 January 2011 |
Latvian lats | LVL | 0.702804 | 9 July 2013 | 1 January 2014 |
Lithuanian litas | LTL | 3.45280 | 23 July 2014 | 1 January 2015 |
Croatian kuna | HRK | 7.53450 | 12 July 2022 | 1 January 2023 |
The euro was established by the provisions in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. To participate in the currency, member states are meant to meet strict criteria, such as a budget deficit of less than 3% of their GDP, a debt ratio of less than 60% of GDP (both of which were ultimately widely flouted after introduction), low inflation, and interest rates close to the EU average. In the Maastricht Treaty, the United Kingdom and Denmark were granted exemptions per their request from moving to the stage of monetary union which resulted in the introduction of the euro (see also United Kingdom and the euro).
The name "euro" was officially adopted in Madrid on 16 December 1995. Belgian Esperantist Germain Pirlot, a former teacher of French and history, is credited with naming the new currency by sending a letter to then President of the European Commission, Jacques Santer, suggesting the name "euro" on 4 August 1995.
Due to differences in national conventions for rounding and significant digits, all conversion between the national currencies had to be carried out using the process of triangulation via the euro. The definitive values of one euro in terms of the exchange rates at which the currency entered the euro are shown in the table.
The rates were determined by the Council of the European Union, based on a recommendation from the European Commission based on the market rates on 31 December 1998. They were set so that one European Currency Unit (ECU) would equal one euro. The European Currency Unit was an accounting unit used by the EU, based on the currencies of the member states; it was not a currency in its own right. They could not be set earlier, because the ECU depended on the closing exchange rate of the non-euro currencies (principally pound sterling) that day.
The procedure used to fix the conversion rate between the Greek drachma and the euro was different since the euro by then was already two years old. While the conversion rates for the initial eleven currencies were determined only hours before the euro was introduced, the conversion rate for the Greek drachma was fixed several months beforehand.
The currency was introduced in non-physical form (traveller's cheques, electronic transfers, banking, etc.) at midnight on 1 January 1999, when the national currencies of participating countries (the eurozone) ceased to exist independently. Their exchange rates were locked at fixed rates against each other. The euro thus became the successor to the European Currency Unit (ECU). The notes and coins for the old currencies, however, continued to be used as legal tender until new euro notes and coins were introduced on 1 January 2002.
The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002. The official date on which the national currencies ceased to be legal tender varied from member state to member state. The earliest date was in Germany, where the mark officially ceased to be legal tender on 31 December 2001, though the exchange period lasted for two months more. Even after the old currencies ceased to be legal tender, they continued to be accepted by national central banks for periods ranging from several years to indefinitely (the latter for Austria, Germany, Ireland, Estonia and Latvia in banknotes and coins, and for Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Slovakia in banknotes only). The earliest coins to become non-convertible were the Portuguese escudos, which ceased to have monetary value after 31 December 2002, although banknotes remained exchangeable until 2022.
Currency sign
Main article: Euro signA special euro currency sign (€) was designed after a public survey had narrowed ten of the original thirty proposals down to two. The President of the European Commission at the time (Jacques Santer) and the European Commissioner with responsibility for the euro (Yves-Thibault de Silguy) then chose the winning design.
Regarding the symbol, the European Commission stated on behalf of the European Union:
The symbol € is based on the Greek letter epsilon (Є), with the first letter in the word "Europe" and with 2 parallel lines signifying stability.
— Directorate-General for Communication
The European Commission also specified a euro logo with exact proportions. Placement of the currency sign relative to the numeric amount varies from state to state, but for texts in English published by EU institutions, the symbol (or the ISO-standard "EUR") should precede the amount.
Eurozone crisis
Main articles: European debt crisis and Greek government-debt crisis See also: 2008–2011 Icelandic financial crisisFollowing the U.S. financial crisis in 2008, fears of a sovereign debt crisis developed in 2009 among investors concerning some European states, with the situation becoming particularly tense in early 2010. Greece was most acutely affected, but fellow Eurozone members Cyprus, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain were also significantly affected. All these countries used EU funds except Italy, which is a major donor to the EFSF. To be included in the eurozone, countries had to fulfil certain convergence criteria, but the meaningfulness of such criteria was diminished by the fact it was not enforced with the same level of strictness among countries.
According to the Economist Intelligence Unit in 2011, "f the is treated as a single entity, its position looks no worse and in some respects, rather better than that of the US or the UK" and the budget deficit for the euro area as a whole is much lower and the euro area's government debt/GDP ratio of 86% in 2010 was about the same level as that of the United States. "Moreover", they write, "private-sector indebtedness across the euro area as a whole is markedly lower than in the highly leveraged Anglo-Saxon economies". The authors conclude that the crisis "is as much political as economic" and the result of the fact that the euro area lacks the support of "institutional paraphernalia (and mutual bonds of solidarity) of a state".
The crisis continued with S&P downgrading the credit rating of nine euro-area countries, including France, then downgrading the entire European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) fund.
A historical parallel – to 1931 when Germany was burdened with debt, unemployment and austerity while France and the United States were relatively strong creditors – gained attention in summer 2012 even as Germany received a debt-rating warning of its own.
Direct and indirect usage
Further information: Eurozone, International status and usage of the euro, and Enlargement of the eurozone Austria Belgium Croatia Cyprus Finland Estonia France Greece Germany Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Andorra Monaco San Marino Vatican City Kos Mont. Eurozone members (20) Monetary agreement (4) Unilaterally adopted (2)Agreed direct usage with minting rights
The euro is the sole currency of 20 EU member states: Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain. These countries constitute the "eurozone", some 347 million people in total as of 2023. According to bilateral agreements with the EU, the euro has also been designated as the sole and official currency in a further four European microstates awarded minting rights (Andorra, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City). All but one (Denmark) current, and any potential future EU members, are obliged to adopt the euro when economic conditions permit.
Agreed direct usage without minting rights
The euro is also the sole currency in three overseas territories of France that are not themselves part of the EU, namely Saint Barthélemy, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, and the French Southern and Antarctic Lands, as well as in the British Overseas Territory of Akrotiri and Dhekelia.
Unilateral direct usage
The euro has been adopted unilaterally as the sole currency of Montenegro and Kosovo. It has also been used as a foreign trading currency in Cuba since 1998, Syria since 2006, and Venezuela since 2018. In 2009, Zimbabwe abandoned its local currency and introduced major global convertible currencies instead, including the euro and the United States dollar. The direct usage of the euro outside of the official framework of the EU affects nearly 3 million people.
Currencies pegged to the euro
Main article: International status and usage of the euroOutside the eurozone, two EU member states have currencies that are pegged to the euro, which is a precondition to joining the eurozone. The Danish krone and Bulgarian lev are pegged due to their participation in the ERM II.
Additionally, a total of 22 countries and territories that do not belong to the EU have currencies that are directly pegged to the euro including 14 countries in mainland Africa (CFA franc), three African island countries (Comorian franc, Cape Verdean escudo and São Tomé and Príncipe dobra (since 1 January 2010)), three French Pacific territories (CFP franc) and two Balkan countries, Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark) and North Macedonia (Macedonian denar). Additionally, the Moroccan dirham is tied to a basket of currencies, including the euro and the US dollar, with the euro given the highest weighting.
These countries generally had previously implemented a currency peg to one of the major European currencies (e.g. the French franc, Deutsche Mark or Portuguese escudo), and when these currencies were replaced by the euro their currencies became pegged to the euro. Pegging a country's currency to a major currency is regarded as a safety measure, especially for currencies of areas with weak economies, as the euro is seen as a stable currency, prevents runaway inflation, and encourages foreign investment due to its stability.
In total, as of 2013, 182 million people in Africa use a currency pegged to the euro, 27 million people outside the eurozone in Europe, and another 545,000 people on Pacific islands.
Since 2005, stamps issued by the Sovereign Military Order of Malta have been denominated in euros, although the Order's official currency remains the Maltese scudo. The Maltese scudo itself is pegged to the euro and is only recognised as legal tender within the Order.
The currency of a number of states is pegged to the euro. These states are:
North America
- Haiti (Haitian gourde, HTG)
Europe
- Albania (Albanian lek, ALL)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnia and Herzegovina convertible mark, BAM)
- Bulgaria (Bulgarian lev, BGN)
- Denmark (Danish krone, DKK)
- North Macedonia (Macedonian denar, MKD)
- Sovereign Military Order of Malta (Maltese scudo)
- Moldova (Moldovan leu, MDL)
- Romania (Romanian leu, RON)
- Serbia (Serbian dinar, RSD)
Oceania
- French Polynesia (CFP franc, XPF)
- New Caledonia (CFP franc)
- Wallis and Futuna (CFP franc)
Africa
- Burundi (Burundi franc, BIF)
- Cape Verde (Cape Verdean escudo, CVE)
- Cameroon (Central African CFA franc, XAF)
- Central African Republic (Central African CFA franc)
- Chad (Central African CFA franc)
- Equatorial Guinea (Central African CFA franc)
- Gabon (Central African CFA franc)
- Congo (Central African CFA franc)
- Comoros (Comorian franc, KMF)
- DR Congo (Congolese franc, CDF)
- Djibouti (Djibouti franc, DJF)
- Eritrea (Eritrean nakfa, ERN)
- Ethiopia (Ethiopian birr, ETB)
- Gambia (Gambian dalasi, GMD)
- Guinea (Guinean franc, GNF)
- Madagascar (Malagasy ariary, MGA)
- Mozambique (Mozambique metical, MZN)
- Rwanda (Rwanda franc, RWF)
- Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (Sahrawi peseta)
- São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé and Príncipe dobra, STN)
- Sierra Leone (Sierra Leonean leone, SLE)
- Benin (West African CFA franc, XOF)
- Burkina Faso (West African CFA franc)
- Ivory Coast (West African CFA franc)
- Guinea-Bissau (West African CFA franc)
- Mali (West African CFA franc)
- Niger (West African CFA franc)
- Senegal (West African CFA franc)
- Togo (West African CFA franc)
Use as reserve currency
Since its introduction in 1999, the euro has been the second most widely held international reserve currency after the U.S. dollar. The share of the euro as a reserve currency increased from 18% in 1999 to 27% in 2008. Over this period, the share held in U.S. dollar fell from 71% to 64% and that held in RMB fell from 6.4% to 3.3%. The euro inherited and built on the status of the Deutsche Mark as the second most important reserve currency. The euro remains underweight as a reserve currency in advanced economies while overweight in emerging and developing economies: according to the International Monetary Fund the total of euro held as a reserve in the world at the end of 2008 was equal to $1.1 trillion or €850 billion, with a share of 22% of all currency reserves in advanced economies, but a total of 31% of all currency reserves in emerging and developing economies.
The possibility of the euro becoming the first international reserve currency has been debated among economists. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan gave his opinion in September 2007 that it was "absolutely conceivable that the euro will replace the US dollar as reserve currency, or will be traded as an equally important reserve currency". In contrast to Greenspan's 2007 assessment, the euro's increase in the share of the worldwide currency reserve basket has slowed considerably since 2007 and since the beginning of the worldwide credit crunch related recession and European sovereign-debt crisis.
Economics
Optimal currency area
Further information: Optimum currency areaIn economics, an optimum currency area, or region (OCA or OCR), is a geographical region in which it would maximise economic efficiency to have the entire region share a single currency. There are two models, both proposed by Robert Mundell: the stationary expectations model and the international risk sharing model. Mundell himself advocates the international risk sharing model and thus concludes in favour of the euro. However, even before the creation of the single currency, there were concerns over diverging economies. Before the late-2000s recession it was considered unlikely that a state would leave the euro or the whole zone would collapse. However the Greek government-debt crisis led to former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw claiming the eurozone could not last in its current form. Part of the problem seems to be the rules that were created when the euro was set up. John Lanchester, writing for The New Yorker, explains it:
The guiding principle of the currency, which opened for business in 1999, were supposed to be a set of rules to limit a country's annual deficit to three per cent of gross domestic product, and the total accumulated debt to sixty per cent of G.D.P. It was a nice idea, but by 2004 the two biggest economies in the euro zone, Germany and France, had broken the rules for three years in a row.
Increasing business cycle divergence across the Eurozone over the last decades implies a decreasing Optimum Currency Area.
Transaction costs and risks
The most obvious benefit of adopting a single currency is to remove the cost of exchanging currency, theoretically allowing businesses and individuals to consummate previously unprofitable trades. For consumers, banks in the eurozone must charge the same for intra-member cross-border transactions as purely domestic transactions for electronic payments (e.g., credit cards, debit cards and cash machine withdrawals).
Financial markets on the continent are expected to be far more liquid and flexible than they were in the past. The reduction in cross-border transaction costs will allow larger banking firms to provide a wider array of banking services that can compete across and beyond the eurozone. However, although transaction costs were reduced, some studies have shown that risk aversion has increased during the last 40 years in the Eurozone.
Price parity
Another effect of the common European currency is that differences in prices—in particular in price levels—should decrease because of the law of one price. Differences in prices can trigger arbitrage, i.e., speculative trade in a commodity across borders purely to exploit the price differential. Therefore, prices on commonly traded goods are likely to converge, causing inflation in some regions and deflation in others during the transition. Some evidence of this has been observed in specific eurozone markets.
Macroeconomic stability
Before the introduction of the euro, some countries had successfully contained inflation, which was then seen as a major economic problem, by establishing largely independent central banks. One such bank was the Bundesbank in Germany; the European Central Bank was modelled on the Bundesbank.
The euro has come under criticism due to its regulation, lack of flexibility and rigidity towards sharing member states on issues such as nominal interest rates. Many national and corporate bonds denominated in euro are significantly more liquid and have lower interest rates than was historically the case when denominated in national currencies. While increased liquidity may lower the nominal interest rate on the bond, denominating the bond in a currency with low levels of inflation arguably plays a much larger role. A credible commitment to low levels of inflation and a stable debt reduces the risk that the value of the debt will be eroded by higher levels of inflation or default in the future, allowing debt to be issued at a lower nominal interest rate.
There is also a cost in structurally keeping inflation lower than in the United States, United Kingdom, and China. The result is that seen from those countries, the euro has become expensive, making European products increasingly expensive for its largest importers; hence export from the eurozone becomes more difficult.
In general, those in Europe who own large amounts of euro are served by high stability and low inflation.
A monetary union means states in that union lose the main mechanism of recovery of their international competitiveness by weakening (depreciating) their currency. When wages become too high compared to productivity in the exports sector, then these exports become more expensive and they are crowded out from the market within a country and abroad. This drives the fall of employment and output in the exports sector and fall of trade and current account balances. Fall of output and employment in the tradable goods sector may be offset by the growth of non-exports sectors, especially in construction and services. Increased purchases abroad and negative current account balances can be financed without a problem as long as credit is cheap. The need to finance trade deficit weakens currency, making exports automatically more attractive in a country and abroad. A state in a monetary union cannot use weakening of currency to recover its international competitiveness. To achieve this a state has to reduce prices, including wages (deflation). This could result in high unemployment and lower incomes as it was during the European sovereign-debt crisis.
Trade
The euro increased price transparency and stimulated cross-border trade. A 2009 consensus from the studies of the introduction of the euro concluded that it has increased trade within the eurozone by 5% to 10%, and a meta-analysis of all available studies on the effect of introduction of the euro on increased trade suggests that the prevalence of positive estimates is caused by publication bias and that the underlying effect may be negligible. Although a more recent meta-analysis shows that publication bias decreases over time and that there are positive trade effects from the introduction of the euro, as long as results from before 2010 are taken into account. This may be because of the inclusion of the Financial crisis of 2007–2008 and ongoing integration within the EU. Furthermore, older studies based on certain methods of analysis of main trends reflecting general cohesion policies in Europe that started before, and continue after implementing the common currency find no effect on trade. These results suggest that other policies aimed at European integration might be the source of observed increase in trade. According to Barry Eichengreen, studies disagree on the magnitude of the effect of the euro on trade, but they agree that it did have an effect.
Investment
Physical investment seems to have increased by 5% in the eurozone due to the introduction. Regarding foreign direct investment, a study found that the intra-eurozone FDI stocks have increased by about 20% during the first four years of the EMU. Concerning the effect on corporate investment, there is evidence that the introduction of the euro has resulted in an increase in investment rates and that it has made it easier for firms to access financing in Europe. The euro has most specifically stimulated investment in companies that come from countries that previously had weak currencies. A study found that the introduction of the euro accounts for 22% of the investment rate after 1998 in countries that previously had a weak currency.
Inflation
The introduction of the euro has led to extensive discussion about its possible effect on inflation. In the short term, there was a widespread impression in the population of the eurozone that the introduction of the euro had led to an increase in prices, but this impression was not confirmed by general indices of inflation and other studies. A study of this paradox found that this was due to an asymmetric effect of the introduction of the euro on prices: while it had no effect on most goods, it had an effect on cheap goods which have seen their price round up after the introduction of the euro. The study found that consumers based their beliefs on inflation of those cheap goods which are frequently purchased. It has also been suggested that the jump in small prices may be because prior to the introduction, retailers made fewer upward adjustments and waited for the introduction of the euro to do so. Based on the introduction of the euro as the official currency in Croatia in 2023, the ECB argues that inflation due to a change of currency is a one-time effect of limited impact.
Exchange rate risk
One of the advantages of the adoption of a common currency is the reduction of the risk associated with changes in currency exchange rates. It has been found that the introduction of the euro created "significant reductions in market risk exposures for nonfinancial firms both in and outside Europe". These reductions in market risk "were concentrated in firms domiciled in the eurozone and in non-euro firms with a high fraction of foreign sales or assets in Europe".
Financial integration
The introduction of the euro increased financial integration within Europe, which helped stimulate growth of a European securities market (bond markets are characterized by economies of scale dynamics). According to a study on this question, it has "significantly reshaped the European financial system, especially with respect to the securities markets However, the real and policy barriers to integration in the retail and corporate banking sectors remain significant, even if the wholesale end of banking has been largely integrated." Specifically, the euro has significantly decreased the cost of trade in bonds, equity, and banking assets within the eurozone. On a global level, there is evidence that the introduction of the euro has led to an integration in terms of investment in bond portfolios, with eurozone countries lending and borrowing more between each other than with other countries. Financial integration made it cheaper for European companies to borrow. Banks, firms and households could also invest more easily outside of their own country, thus creating greater international risk-sharing.
Effect on interest rates
As of January 2014, and since the introduction of the euro, interest rates of most member countries (particularly those with a weak currency) have decreased. Some of these countries had the most serious sovereign financing problems.
The effect of declining interest rates, combined with excess liquidity continually provided by the ECB, made it easier for banks within the countries in which interest rates fell the most, and their linked sovereigns, to borrow significant amounts (above the 3% of GDP budget deficit imposed on the eurozone initially) and significantly inflate their public and private debt levels. Following the financial crisis of 2007–2008, governments in these countries found it necessary to bail out or nationalise their privately held banks to prevent systemic failure of the banking system when underlying hard or financial asset values were found to be grossly inflated and sometimes so nearly worthless there was no liquid market for them. This further increased the already high levels of public debt to a level the markets began to consider unsustainable, via increasing government bond interest rates, producing the ongoing European sovereign-debt crisis.
Price convergence
The evidence on the convergence of prices in the eurozone with the introduction of the euro is mixed. Several studies failed to find any evidence of convergence following the introduction of the euro after a phase of convergence in the early 1990s. Other studies have found evidence of price convergence, in particular for cars. A possible reason for the divergence between the different studies is that the processes of convergence may not have been linear, slowing down substantially between 2000 and 2003, and resurfacing after 2003 as suggested by a recent study (2009).
Tourism
A study suggests that the introduction of the euro has had a positive effect on the amount of tourist travel within the EMU, with an increase of 6.5%.
Exchange rates
Flexible exchange rates
The ECB targets interest rates rather than exchange rates and in general, does not intervene on the foreign exchange rate markets. This is because of the implications of the Mundell–Fleming model, which implies a central bank cannot (without capital controls) maintain interest rate and exchange rate targets simultaneously, because increasing the money supply results in a depreciation of the currency. In the years following the Single European Act, the EU has liberalised its capital markets and, as the ECB has inflation targeting as its monetary policy, the exchange-rate regime of the euro is floating.
Against other major currencies
The euro is the second-most widely held reserve currency after the U.S. dollar. After its introduction on 4 January 1999 its exchange rate against the other major currencies fell reaching its lowest exchange rates in 2000 (3 May vs sterling, 25 October vs the U.S. dollar, 26 October vs Japanese yen). Afterwards it regained and its exchange rate reached its historical highest point in 2008 (15 July vs US dollar, 23 July vs Japanese yen, 29 December vs sterling). With the advent of the global financial crisis the euro initially fell, to regain later. Despite pressure due to the European sovereign-debt crisis, the euro remained stable. In November 2011 the euro's exchange rate index – measured against currencies of the bloc's major trading partners – was trading almost two percent higher on the year, approximately at the same level as it was before the crisis began in 2007. In mid July 2022, the euro and the US dollar traded at par for a short period of time during an episode of dollar appreciation. On 11 July 2024, it recorded a new high against the Japanese yen during a long period of depreciation of the latter.
Euro exchange rate against US dollar (USD), sterling (GBP) and Japanese yen (JPY), starting from 1999.- Current and historical exchange rates against 32 other currencies (European Central Bank): link
Current EUR exchange rates | |
---|---|
From Google Finance: | AUD CAD CHF CNY GBP HKD JPY USD SEK PLN |
From Yahoo! Finance: | AUD CAD CHF CNY GBP HKD JPY USD SEK PLN |
From XE.com: | AUD CAD CHF CNY GBP HKD JPY USD SEK PLN |
From OANDA: | AUD CAD CHF CNY GBP HKD JPY USD SEK PLN |
Political considerations
Besides the economic motivations to the introduction of the euro, its creation was also partly justified as a way to foster a closer sense of joint identity between European citizens. Statements about this goal were for instance made by Wim Duisenberg, European Central Bank Governor, in 1998, Laurent Fabius, French Finance Minister, in 2000, and Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission, in 2002. However, 15 years after the introduction of the euro, a study found no evidence that it has had any effect on a shared sense of European identity.
Public support of Euro by country according to Eurobarometer 2024:
Country | For % | Against % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 66 | 27 |
Belgium | 82 | 15 |
Bulgaria | 37 | 47 |
Croatia | 71 | 24 |
Cyprus | 80 | 16 |
Czech Republic | 30 | 62 |
Denmark | 34 | 58 |
Estonia | 90 | 8 |
Finland | 90 | 7 |
France | 74 | 20 |
Germany | 81 | 14 |
Greece | 80 | 16 |
Hungary | 65 | 28 |
Ireland | 88 | 7 |
Italy | 70 | 23 |
Latvia | 85 | 8 |
Lithuania | 78 | 15 |
Luxembourg | 90 | 8 |
Malta | 89 | 8 |
Netherlands | 84 | 13 |
Poland | 36 | 51 |
Portugal | 81 | 13 |
Romania | 54 | 37 |
Slovakia | 86 | 8 |
Slovenia | 92 | 7 |
Spain | 83 | 11 |
Sweden | 37 | 56 |
Euro in various official EU languages
Main article: Language and the euroThe formal titles of the currency are euro for the major unit and cent for the minor (one-hundredth) unit and for official use in most eurozone languages; according to the ECB, all languages should use the same spelling for the nominative singular. This may contradict normal rules for word formation in some languages.
Bulgaria has negotiated an exception; euro in the Bulgarian Cyrillic alphabet is spelled eвро (evro) and not eуро (euro) in all official documents. In the Greek script the term ευρώ (evró) is used; the Greek "cent" coins are denominated in λεπτό/ά (leptó/á). Official practice for English-language EU legislation is to use the words euro and cent as both singular and plural, although the European Commission's Directorate-General for Translation states that the plural forms euros and cents should be used in English. The word 'euro' is pronounced differently according to pronunciation rules in the individual languages applied; in German [ˈɔʏʁo], in English /ˈjʊəroʊ/, in French [øʁo], etc.
In summary:
Language(s) | Name | IPA |
---|---|---|
In most EU languages | euro | Croatian: [ěuro], Czech: [ˈɛuro], Danish: [ˈœwʁo], Dutch: [ˈøːroː], Estonian: [ˈeu̯ro], Finnish: [ˈeu̯ro], French: [øʁo], Italian: [ˈɛuro], Polish: [ˈɛwrɔ], Portuguese: [ˈewɾɔ] or [ˈewɾu], Slovak: [ˈewrɔ], Spanish: [ˈewɾo] |
Bulgarian | евро evro | Bulgarian: [ˈɛvro] |
German | Euro | [ˈɔʏʁo] |
Greek | ευρώ evró | [eˈvro] |
Hungarian | euró | [ˈɛuroː] or [ˈɛu̯roː] |
Latvian | euro or eiro | [ɛìro] |
Lithuanian | euras | [ˈɛʊrɐs] |
Maltese | ewro | [ˈɛwrɔ] |
Slovene | evro | [ˈéːʋrɔ] |
For local phonetics, cent, use of plural and amount formatting (€6,00 or 6.00 €), see Language and the euro.
See also
- Captain Euro, The Raspberry Ice Cream War
- Causes of the European debt crisis
- Controversies surrounding the eurozone crisis
- Currency union
- Digital euro
- Economic and Monetary Union of the European Union
- European debt crisis
- European integration
- History of the European Union
- List of acronyms associated with the eurozone crisis
- List of currencies in Europe
- Proposed long-term solutions for the eurozone crisis
- Withdrawal from the eurozone
Notes
- Official documents and legislation refer to the euro as "the single currency".
- Northern Cyprus, where the government of the Republic of Cyprus does not exercise effective control, uses the Turkish lira.
- Including outermost regions of French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Mayotte, Réunion, Saint Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon.
- Only the European part of the country is part of the European Union and uses the euro. The Caribbean Netherlands introduced the United States dollar in 2011 following the dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles (which used the Netherlands Antillean guilder). Curaçao, Sint Maarten and Aruba have their own currencies, which are pegged to the dollar.
- See Montenegro and the euro.
- by means of Council Regulation 2866/98 (EC) of 31 December 1998.
- by Council Regulation 1478/2000 (EC) of 19 June 2000.
References
- "Council Regulation (EC) No 1103/97 of 17 June 1997 on certain provisions relating to the introduction of the euro". Official Journal L 162, 19 June 1997 P. 0001 – 0003. European Communities. 19 June 1997. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
- ^ "ECB Statistical Data Warehouse, Reports>ECB/Eurosystem policy>Banknotes and coins statistics>1.Euro banknotes>1.1 Quantities". European Central Bank.
- Walsh, Alistair (29 May 2017). "Italy to stop producing 1- and 2-cent coins". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 4 November 2019.
- "Po 1. júli 2022 budú končiť na Slovensku jedno a dvojcentové mince". bystricoviny.sk (in Slovak). 29 May 2017. Retrieved 17 December 2023.
- "Inflation and consumer prices".
- "The euro". European Commission website. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
- ^ "What is the euro area?". European Commission website. Retrieved 2 January 2019.
- "IMF Data – Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserve – At a Glance". International Monetary Fund. 23 December 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2023.
- "Foreign exchange turnover in April 2013: preliminary global results" (PDF). Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
- "Triennial Central Bank Survey 2007" (PDF). BIS. 19 December 2007. Retrieved 25 July 2009.
- Aristovnik, Aleksander; Čeč, Tanja (30 March 2010). "Compositional Analysis of Foreign Currency Reserves in the 1999–2007 Period. The Euro vs. The Dollar As Leading Reserve Currency" (PDF). Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 14350. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
- Boesler, Matthew (11 November 2013). "There Are Only Two Real Threats to the US Dollar's Status As The International Reserve Currency". Business Insider. Retrieved 8 December 2013.
- "1.2 Euro banknotes, values". European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse. 14 January 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
- "2.2 Euro coins, values". European Central Bank Statistical Data Warehouse. 14 January 2020. Retrieved 23 January 2020.
- ^ "Madrid European Council (12/95): Conclusions". European Parliament. Retrieved 14 February 2009.
- "Initial changeover (2002)". European Central Bank. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
- ^ "Euro Falls Near Parity With Dollar, a Threshold Watched Closely by Investors". The New York Times. 12 July 2022. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
- "Euro fällt zum US-Dollar auf 20-Jahrestief". Der Spiegel (in German). 23 September 2022. ISSN 2195-1349. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- "Euro (EUR) To US Dollar (USD) Exchange Rate History for 2022". www.exchange-rates.org. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- "The Euro". European Commission. Retrieved 29 January 2009.
- Nice, Treaty of. "Treaty of Nice". About Parliament. European Parliament. Retrieved 7 May 2021.
- "By agreement of the EU Council". Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- "Monetary Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Andorra". Official Journal of the European Union. 17 December 2011. Archived from the original on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
- "By monetary agreement between France (acting for the EC) and Monaco". Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- "By monetary agreement between Italy (acting for the EC) and San Marino". Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- "By monetary agreement between Italy (acting for the EC) and Vatican City". Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- Theodoulou, Michael (27 December 2007). "Euro reaches field that is for ever England". The Times. Archived from the original on 10 May 2011. Retrieved 4 January 2008.
- "By UNMIK administration direction 1999/2". Unmikonline.org. Archived from the original on 7 June 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- "Economic forecasts optimistic as Bulgaria moves closer to joining eurozone". Euractiv. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
- "The design of future Bulgarian euro coins has been approved". Radio Bulgaria. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
- "How to use the euro name and symbol". European Commission. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
- European Commission. "Spelling of the words "euro" and "cent" in official Community languages as used in Community Legislative acts" (PDF). Retrieved 26 November 2008.
- European Commission Directorate-General for Translation. "English Style Guide: A handbook for authors and translators in the European Commission" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 16 November 2008.; European Union. "Interinstitutional style guide, 7.3.3. Rules for expressing monetary units". Retrieved 16 November 2008.
- "Common sides of euro coins". Europa. European Commission. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
- "Ireland to round to nearest 5 cents starting October 28". 27 October 2015. Archived from the original on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 17 December 2018.
- "Rounding". Central Bank of Ireland.
- European Commission (January 2007). "Euro cash: five and familiar". Europa. Retrieved 26 January 2009.
- Pop, Valentina (22 March 2010) "Commission frowns on shop signs that say: '€500 notes not accepted'", EU Observer
- European Commission (15 February 2003). "Commission communication: The introduction of euro banknotes and coins one year after COM(2002) 747". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 26 January 2009.
- "Robert Kalina, designer of the euro banknotes, at work at the Oesterreichische Nationalbank in Vienna". European Central Bank. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- Schmid, John (3 August 2001). "Etching the Notes of a New European Identity". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 29 May 2009.
- ^ "Banknotes". European Central Bank. Retrieved 10 May 2020.
- "ECB to redesign euro banknotes by 2024". European Central Bank. 6 December 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
- ^ Scheller, Hanspeter K. (2006). The European Central Bank: History, Role and Functions (PDF) (2nd ed.). European Central Bank. p. 103. ISBN 978-92-899-0027-0.
Since 1 January 2002, the NCBs and the ECB have issued euro banknotes on a joint basis.
-
"Capital Subscription". European Central Bank. Retrieved 18 December 2011.
The NCBs' shares in this capital are calculated using a key which reflects the respective country's share in the total population and gross domestic product of the EU – in equal weightings. The ECB adjusts the shares every five years and whenever a new country joins the EU. The adjustment is done on the basis of data provided by the European Commission.
- "Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 on cross-border payments in euro". EUR-lex – European Communities, Publications office, Official Journal L 344, 28 December 2001 P. 0013 – 0016. Retrieved 26 December 2008.
- "Cross border payments in the EU, Euro Information, The Official Treasury Euro Resource". United Kingdom Treasury. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 26 December 2008.
- European Central Bank. "TARGET". Archived from the original on 21 January 2008. Retrieved 25 October 2007.
- "Use of the euro". European Central Bank. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
- "Germain Pirlot 'uitvinder' van de euro" (in Dutch). De Zeewacht. 16 February 2007. Archived from the original on 30 June 2013. Retrieved 21 May 2012.
- "The euro, our currency | A symbol for the European currency" (PDF). European Commission. 18 March 2009. Retrieved 8 April 2023.
- ^ Directorate-General for Communication. "Institutions, law, budget | The Euro | Design". European Union. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
- "Position of the ISO code or euro sign in amounts". Interinstitutional style guide. Bruxelles, Belgium: Europa Publications Office. 5 February 2009. Retrieved 10 January 2010.
- George Matlock (16 February 2010). "Peripheral euro zone government bond spreads widen". Reuters. Retrieved 28 April 2010.
- "Acropolis now". The Economist. 29 April 2010. Retrieved 22 June 2011.
- European Debt Crisis Fast Facts, CNN Library (last updated 22 January 2017).
- Ricardo Reis, Looking for a Success in the Euro Crisis Adjustment Programs: The Case of Portugal, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Brookings Institution (Fall 2015), p. 433.
- "Efsf, come funziona il fondo salvastati europeo". 4 November 2011.
- "The politics of the Maastricht convergence criteria". VoxEU. 15 April 2009. Retrieved 1 October 2011.
- "State of the Union: Can the euro zone survive its debt crisis?" (PDF). Economist Intelligence Unit. 1 March 2011. p. 4. Retrieved 1 December 2011.
- "S&P downgrades euro zone's EFSF bailout fund". Reuters. 16 January 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2017.
- Delamaide, Darrell (24 July 2012). "Euro crisis brings world to brink of depression". MarketWatch. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
- Lindner, Fabian, "Germany would do well to heed the Moody's warning shot", The Guardian, 24 July 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2012.
- Buergin, Rainer, "Germany, Juncker Push Back After Moody's Rating Outlook Cuts Archived 28 July 2012 at the Wayback Machine", washpost.bloomberg, 24 July 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2012.
- ^ Population Reference Bureau. "2013 World Population Data Sheet" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2015. Retrieved 1 October 2013.
- "Sovereign Base areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on Cyprus". Commonwealth Chamber of Commerce.
- "Cuba to adopt euro in foreign trade". BBC News. 8 November 1998. Retrieved 2 January 2008.
- "US row leads Syria to snub dollar". BBC News. 14 February 2006. Retrieved 2 January 2008.
- Rosati, Andrew; Zerpa, Fabiola (17 October 2018). "Dollars Are Out, Euros Are in as U.S. Sanctions Sting Venezuela". Bloomberg. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
- "Zimbabwe: A Critical Review of Sterp". 17 April 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2009.
- "1 euro equivale a 24.500 dobras" [1 euro is equivalent to 24,500 dobras] (in Portuguese). Téla Nón. 4 January 2009. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
- ^ Cardoso, Paulo. "Interview – Governor of the National Bank of Macedonia – Dimitar Bogov". The American Times United States Emerging Economies Report (USEER Report). Hazlehurst Media SA. Archived from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 8 September 2013.
- "Retrieved 3 October 2017".
- "Numismatica". Ordine di Malta Italia. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
- ^ "Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) – Updated COFER tables include first quarter 2009 data. June 30, 2009" (PDF). Retrieved 8 July 2009.
- "Will the Euro Eventually Surpass the Dollar As Leading International Reserve Currency?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 August 2013. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- "Euro could replace dollar as top currency – Greenspan". Reuters. 17 September 2007. Retrieved 17 September 2007.
- Mundell, Robert (1970) . "A Plan for a European Currency". In Johnson, H. G.; Swoboda, A. K. (eds.). The Economics of Common Currencies – Proceedings of Conference on Optimum Currency Areas. 1970. Madrid. London: Allen and Unwin. pp. 143–172. ISBN 9780043320495.
- Eichengreen, Barry (14 September 2007). "The Breakup of the Euro Area by Barry Eichengreen". NBER Working Paper (w13393). SSRN 1014341.
- "Greek debt crisis: Straw says eurozone 'will collapse'". BBC News. 20 June 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- John Lanchester, "Euro Science", The New Yorker, 10 October 2011.
- Beck, Krzysztof; Okhrimenko, Iana (2024). "Optimum Currency Area in the Eurozone". Open Economies Review. doi:10.1007/s11079-024-09750-z. ISSN 0923-7992.
- Benchimol, J., 2014. Risk aversion in the Eurozone, Research in Economics, vol. 68, issue 1, pp. 40–56.
- Goldberg, Pinelopi K.; Verboven, Frank (2005). "Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market". Journal of International Economics. 65 (1): 49–73. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.494.1517. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.12.002. S2CID 26850030.
- de Haan, Jakob (2000). The History of the Bundesbank: Lessons for the European Central Bank. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-21723-1.
- Silvia, Steven J (2004). "Is the Euro Working? The Euro and European Labour Markets". Journal of Public Policy. 24 (2): 147–168. doi:10.1017/s0143814x0400008x. JSTOR 4007858. S2CID 152633940.
- Ernest Pytlarczyk, Stefan Kawalec (June 2012). "Controlled Dismantlement of the Euro Area in Order to Preserve the European Union and Single European Market". CASE Center for Social and Economic Research. p. 11. Retrieved 19 December 2018.
- Martin Feldstein (January–February 2012). "The Failure of the Euro". Foreign Affairs. Chapter: Trading Places.
- ^ Eichengreen, Barry (2019). Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press. pp. 212–213. doi:10.2307/j.ctvd58rxg. ISBN 978-0-691-19390-8. JSTOR j.ctvd58rxg. S2CID 240840930.
- "The euro's trade effects" (PDF). Retrieved 2 October 2009.
- Havránek, Tomáš (2010). "Rose effect and the euro: is the magic gone?" (PDF). Review of World Economics. 146 (2): 241–261. doi:10.1007/s10290-010-0050-1. S2CID 53585674.
- Polák, Petr (2019). "The Euro's Trade Effect: A Meta-Analysis" (PDF). Journal of Economic Surveys. 33 (1): 101–124. doi:10.1111/joes.12264. hdl:10419/174189. ISSN 1467-6419. S2CID 157693449.
- Gomes, Tamara; Graham, Chris; Helliwel, John; Takashi, Kano; Murray, John; Schembri, Lawrence (August 2006). "The Euro and Trade: Is there a Positive Effect?" (PDF). Bank of Canada. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 September 2015.
- H., Berger; V., Nitsch (2008). "Zooming out: The trade effect of the euro in historical perspective" (PDF). Journal of International Money and Finance. 27 (8): 1244–1260. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.07.005. hdl:10419/18799. S2CID 53493723.
- "The Impact of the Euro on Investment: Sectoral Evidence" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 August 2013. Retrieved 2 October 2009.
- "Does the single currency affect FDI?" (PDF). AFSE.fr. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 December 2006. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- "The Real Effects of the Euro: Evidence from Corporate Investments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2010.
- Paolo Angelini; Francesco Lippi (December 2007). "Did Prices Really Soar after the Euro Cash Changeover? Evidence from ATM Withdrawals" (PDF). International Journal of Central Banking. Retrieved 23 August 2011.
- Irmtraud Beuerlein. "Fünf Jahre nach der Euro-Bargeldeinführung –War der Euro wirklich ein Teuro?" [Five years after the introduction of euro cash – Did the euro really make things more expensive?] (PDF) (in German). Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. Retrieved 23 August 2011.
- Dziuda, Wioletta; Mastrobuoni, Giovanni (2009). "The Euro Changeover and Its Effects on Price Transparency and Inflation". Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 41 (1): 101–129. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00189.x. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
- Hobijn, Bart; Ravenna, Federico; Tambalotti, Andrea (2006). "Quarterly Journal of Economics – Abstract" (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Economics. 121 (3): 1103–1131. doi:10.1162/qjec.121.3.1103.
- Falagiarda, Matteo; Gartner, Christine; Mužić, Ivan; Pufnik, Andreja (7 March 2023). "Has the euro changeover really caused extra inflation in Croatia". ECB. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
- Bartram, Söhnke M.; Karolyi, G. Andrew (2006). "The impact of the introduction of the Euro on foreign exchange rate risk exposures". Journal of Empirical Finance. 13 (4–5): 519–549. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.01.002.
- "The Euro and Financial Integration" (PDF). May 2006. Retrieved 2 October 2009.
- Coeurdacier, Nicolas; Martin, Philippe (2009). "The geography of asset trade and the euro: Insiders and outsiders" (PDF). Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 23 (2): 90–113. doi:10.1016/j.jjie.2008.11.001. S2CID 55948853.
- Lane, Philip R. (June 2006). "Global Bond Portfolios and EMU". International Journal of Central Banking. 2 (2): 1–23. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.365.4579.
- "Redwood: The origins of the euro crisis". Investmentweek.co.uk. 3 June 2011. Retrieved 16 September 2011.
- "Farewell, Fair-Weather Euro | IP – Global-Edition". Ip-global.org. Archived from the original on 17 March 2011. Retrieved 16 September 2011.
- "Price setting and inflation dynamics: did EMU matter" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2011.
- "Price convergence in the EMU? Evidence from micro data" (PDF). Retrieved 2 October 2009.
- "One TV, One Price?" (PDF). Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- "One Market, One Money, One Price?" (PDF). Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- Gil-Pareja, Salvador, and Simón Sosvilla-Rivero, "Price Convergence in the European Car Market", FEDEA, November 2005.
- Fritsche, Ulrich; Lein, Sarah; Weber, Sebastian (April 2009). "Do Prices in the EMU Converge (Non-linearly)?" (PDF). University of Hamburg, Department Economics and Politics Discussion Papers, Macroeconomics and Finance Series. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 July 2011. Retrieved 28 December 2010.
- Gil-Pareja, Salvador; Llorca-Vivero, Rafael; Martínez-Serrano, José (May 2007). "The Effect of EMU on Tourism". Review of International Economics. 15 (2): 302–312. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9396.2006.00620.x. S2CID 154503069. SSRN 983231.
- Kirschbaum, Erik. "Schaeuble says markets have confidence in euro". Reuters. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
- "Puzzle over euro's 'mysterious' stability". Reuters. 15 November 2011. Archived from the original on 30 December 2015.
- 日本放送協会 (11 July 2024). "円相場 対ユーロで最安値を更新 | NHK". NHKニュース. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
- "Weekly Pairs in Focus - July 7 (Charts)". DailyForex. 7 July 2024. Retrieved 12 July 2024.
- "Japanese yen sinks to record low against euro". www.bastillepost.com. 1 July 2024. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
- Global Finance After the Crisis. 2013.
The euro is far more than a medium of exchange. It is part of the identity of a people. It reflects what they have in common now and in the future.
- "European identity". Financial Times. 24 July 2000.
Thanks to the euro, our pockets will soon hold solid evidence of a European identity
- Speech to the European Parliament. 16 January 2002.
The euro is becoming a key element in peoples sense of shared European identity and common destiny.
- Franz Buscha (November 2017). "Can a common currency foster a shared social identity across different nations? The case of the euro" (PDF). European Economic Review. 100: 318–336. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.08.011. S2CID 102510742.
- European Commission. Directorate General for Communication. (2024). Public opinion in the European Union: first results : report (Report). Publications Office of the European Union. p. 26. doi:10.2775/437940.
- "European Central Bank, Convergence Report" (PDF). May 2007. Retrieved 29 December 2008.
The euro is the single currency of the member states that have adopted it. To make this singleness apparent, Community law requires a single spelling of the word euro in the nominative singular case in all community and national legislative provisions, taking into account the existence of different alphabets.
- Elena Koinova (19 October 2007). ""Evro" Dispute Over – Portuguese Foreign Minister – Bulgaria". The Sofia Echo. Archived from the original on 3 June 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2011.
- European Commission. "Spelling of the words "euro" and "cent" in official community languages as used in community legislative acts" (PDF). Retrieved 12 January 2009.
- For example, see "English Style Guide" (PDF). European Commission Directorate-General for Translation. 29 June 2010. para. 20.8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2010.
The euro. Like 'pound', 'dollar' or any other currency name in English, the word 'euro' is written in lower case with no initial capital and, where appropriate, takes the plural 's' (as does 'cent').
Further reading
- Bartram, Söhnke M.; Taylor, Stephen J.; Wang, Yaw-Huei (May 2007). "The Euro and European Financial Market Dependence" (PDF). Journal of Banking and Finance. 51 (5): 1461–1481. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.07.014. SSRN 924333.
- Bartram, Söhnke M.; Karolyi, G. Andrew (October 2006). "The Impact of the Introduction of the Euro on Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Exposures". Journal of Empirical Finance. 13 (4–5): 519–549. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2006.01.002. SSRN 299641.
- Baldwin, Richard; Wyplosz, Charles (2004). The Economics of European Integration. New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-710394-1.
- Buti, Marco; Deroose, Servaas; Gaspar, Vitor; Nogueira Martins, João (2010). The Euro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-92-79-09842-0.
- Jordan, Helmuth (2010). "Fehlschlag Euro". Dorrance Publishing. Archived from the original on 16 September 2010. Retrieved 28 January 2011.
- Simonazzi, A.; Vianello, F. (2001). "Financial Liberalization, the European Single Currency and the Problem of Unemployment". In Franzini, R.; Pizzuti, R.F. (eds.). Globalization, Institutions and Social Cohesion. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-67741-3.
External links
- European Union – Euro
- European Commission – Euro Area
- European Central Bank – Euro
- European Central Bank – Euro Exchange Rates
Euro topics | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General | |||||||||
Administration | |||||||||
Fiscal provisions | |||||||||
Economy | |||||||||
International status | |||||||||
Denominations |
| ||||||||
Coins by country with minting rights |
| ||||||||
Non-EU territories using euro per agreement without minting rights | |||||||||
Potential adoption by other countries | |||||||||
Countries and territories using euro unilaterally | |||||||||
Other extant EU currencies |
| ||||||||
History |
| ||||||||