Revision as of 23:51, 16 June 2006 editMcginnly (talk | contribs)Rollbackers14,989 edits added nomination← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:23, 1 October 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,528 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <tt> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
Good article which the ] would like to see improved.--] 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | Good article which the ] would like to see improved.--] 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
*The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic ]. They <span style="color:red;">may or may not be accurate</span> for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on ]. | |||
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at ]. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on ], and should adequately summarize the article. | |||
*Per ] and ], months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide ] for the article. | |||
:This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
*There may be an applicable ] for this article. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{]}} may be useful.|For example, see ], ], or ].}} (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) | |||
*Per ], there should be a non-breaking space - <code>&nbsp;</code> between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of ''18mm'', use ''18 mm'', which when you are editing the page, should look like: <code>18&nbsp;mm</code>. | |||
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at ]. {{{1|}}} | |||
:Done. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
*Please alphabetize the ] and ]. | |||
:Done. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
*There are a few occurrences of ]s in this article- please observe ]. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. {{#if:it has been|For example, | |||
**it has been}}{{#if:correctly|**correctly}}{{#if:{{{3|}}}|**{{{3}}}}}{{#if:{{{4|}}}|**{{{4}}}}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|**{{{5}}}}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|**{{{6}}}}} {{#if:it has been|**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper ] (if they already too, please <s>strike</s> this comment).}} <!--This javascript cannot determine if a citation is provided; if all weasel terms are covered by citations, please strike this--> | |||
*As is done in ], for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change ''blah blah .'' to ''blah blah.'' | |||
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of ]. See also ]. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|For example, | |||
**{{{1}}}}}{{#if:{{{2|}}}|**{{{2}}}}}{{#if:{{{3|}}}|**{{{3}}}}}{{#if:{{{4|}}}|**{{{4}}}}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|**{{{5}}}}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|**{{{6}}}}}{{#if:{{{1|}}}|**and perhaps other copyediting fixes for grammar/spelling are needed.}} | |||
*You may wish to browse through ] (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. | |||
*Thanks, '']'' <sub>]</sub> 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
*Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. A collaboration between ] and myself. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! ] | ] 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
*I second Giano here. Please give us some time. --] ] 10:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:23, 1 October 2024
Neo-Renaissance
Good article which the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Architecture would like to see improved.--Mcginnly 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
- This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like:18 mm
.
- Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
- Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.
- Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
- it has been
- correctly
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already too, please
strikethis comment).
- As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah . to blah blah.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. A collaboration between Ghirla and myself. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! Giano | talk 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- I second Giano here. Please give us some time. --Ghirla 10:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)