Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Neo-Renaissance/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review | Neo-Renaissance Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:59, 17 June 2006 editAndyZ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,875 edits []: PR suggestions← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:23, 1 October 2024 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,527 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <tt> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
Good article which the ] would like to see improved.--] 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC) Good article which the ] would like to see improved.--] 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


*The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic ]. They <font color="red">may or may not be accurate</font> for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on ]. *The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic ]. They <span style="color:red;">may or may not be accurate</span> for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on ].


*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at ]. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on ], and should adequately summarize the article. *Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at ]. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on ], and should adequately summarize the article.


*Per ] and ], months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide ] for the article. *Per ] and ], months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide ] for the article.
:This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


*There may be an applicable ] for this article. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{]}} may be useful.|For example, see ], ], or ].}} (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually) *There may be an applicable ] for this article. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|{{]}} may be useful.|For example, see ], ], or ].}} (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)


*Per ], there should be a non-breaking space - <code>&amp;nbsp;</code> between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of ''18mm'', use ''18&nbsp;mm'', which when you are editing the page, should look like: <tt>18&amp;nbsp;mm</tt>. *Per ], there should be a non-breaking space - <code>&amp;nbsp;</code> between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of ''18mm'', use ''18&nbsp;mm'', which when you are editing the page, should look like: <code>18&amp;nbsp;mm</code>.


*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at ]. {{{1|}}} *Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at ]. {{{1|}}}
:Done. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


*Please alphabetize the ] and ]. *Please alphabetize the ] and ].
:Done. ] (]) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


*There are a few occurrences of ]s in this article- please observe ]. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. {{#if:it has been|For example, *There are a few occurrences of ]s in this article- please observe ]. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. {{#if:it has been|For example,
**it has been}}{{#if:correctly|**correctly}}{{#if:{{{3|}}}|**{{{3}}}}}{{#if:{{{4|}}}|**{{{4}}}}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|**{{{5}}}}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|**{{{6}}}}} {{#if:it has been|**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper ] (if they already too, please <strike>strike</strike> this comment).}} <!--This javascript cannot determine if a citation is provided; if all weasel terms are covered by citations, please strike this--> **it has been}}{{#if:correctly|**correctly}}{{#if:{{{3|}}}|**{{{3}}}}}{{#if:{{{4|}}}|**{{{4}}}}}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|**{{{5}}}}}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|**{{{6}}}}} {{#if:it has been|**might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper ] (if they already too, please <s>strike</s> this comment).}} <!--This javascript cannot determine if a citation is provided; if all weasel terms are covered by citations, please strike this-->


*As is done in ], for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change ''blah blah .'' to ''blah blah.'' *As is done in ], for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change ''blah blah .'' to ''blah blah.''
Line 25: Line 28:
*You may wish to browse through ] (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. *You may wish to browse through ] (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
*Thanks, '']''&nbsp;<sub>]</sub> 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC) *Thanks, '']''&nbsp;<sub>]</sub> 00:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
*Could I just point out, this is in fact one of a series of pages on 19th century revival styles which like this page are still under construction. A collaboration between ] and myself. This is still being researched, and is a long way from completion. Hence PR, or indeed any other form of review is very premature! ] | ] 10:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
*I second Giano here. Please give us some time. --] ] 10:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:23, 1 October 2024

Neo-Renaissance

Good article which the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Architecture would like to see improved.--Mcginnly 23:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

  • The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
  • Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
This has been fixed thanks to bobblewik's tool. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18&nbsp;mm.
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.
Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Done. Joelito (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
    • it has been
    • correctly
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already too, please strike this comment).
  • As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah . to blah blah.