Misplaced Pages

Defending the Undefendable: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:23, 26 January 2014 editCarolmooredc (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,944 edits Undid revision 592423273 by Steeletrap (talk)Explain at talk why not RS or take to RSN; it's a general interest economics book not a peer reviewed journal article← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:28, 29 April 2024 edit undoMatthew Wellington (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,015 edits Rescuing 4 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.3] 
(37 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1976 book by Walter Block}}
{{Infobox book {{Infobox book
| name = Defending the Undefendable | name = Defending the Undefendable
| image = Walter Block - Defending the Undefendable.jpeg | image = Walter Block - Defending the Undefendable.jpeg
| caption = | caption = First edition
| author = Walter Block | author = ]
| country = United States | country = United States
| language = English | language = English
| subject = ], ] | subject = ], ]
| publisher = Fleet Press | publisher = Fleet Press
| release_date = 1976; 2008 Mises Institute edition | release_date = 1976
| media_type = Paperback | media_type = Print (])
| pages = 256 | pages = 256
| isbn = 9781933550176 | isbn = 9781933550176
| dewey= 973.925 | dewey = 973.925
| congress= HB95 .B58 | congress = HB95 .B58
| oclc= 248638106 | oclc = 248638106
| followed_by = Defending the Undefendable II: Freedom in All Realms
| external_url = https://cdn.mises.org/Defending_the_Undefendable_2018.pdf
| external_host = ]
}} }}
'''''Defending the Undefendable''''' is a book by ] originally published in 1976 which defends various classes of individuals whom ] would regard as undesirables.<ref>Walter Block, book reprint, ], 2008 version.</ref> Block is best known for the book which Marcus Epstein describes as defending "pimps, drug dealers, blackmailers, corrupt policemen, and loan sharks as 'economic heroes'."<ref></ref> The book advocates for the application of the ] of ] also in non-popular cases and support ] of all public services.{{Citation needed|date=July 2013}} It has been translated into ten foreign languages.<ref>, ], ''accessed July 31, 2013.''</ref> '''''Defending the Undefendable''''' is a 1976 book by American economist ].<ref>Walter Block, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140628100513/http://mises.org/books/defending.pdf |date=2014-06-28 }} book reprint, ], 2008 version.</ref> It has been translated into ten foreign languages.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131123011315/http://www.business.loyno.edu/bio/walter-block |date=2013-11-23 }}, ], ''accessed July 31, 2013.''</ref> The book advances the thesis that various people are stigmatized for engaging in acts that are often illegal or disreputable yet do not involve ]. Block further proposes these people may in fact benefit society. Each chapter examines a different type of person, including ]s, ]ers, ]s and ]ers.


The original edition included illustrations by ] and a foreword from ], with commentary provided by ].
] said of it, "Defending the Undefendable... opened my eyes to the beauties of libertarianism. It explains that so much of what is assumed to be evil – is not."<ref>], December, 2006, p. 37.</ref> In 2011, writing that economics "illuminates what common sense overlooks", Stossel called the book "eye-opening" and detailed its contents.<ref>], , ], August 25, 2011.</ref>

The book's 2013 sequel, ''Defending the Undefendable II: Freedom in All Realms'', included a foreword by ].<ref>{{ISBN|978-1908089373}}, {{OCLC|923198764}}</ref>

==Reception==
Economist ] thought that by emphasizing marginal scenarios, ''Defending the Undefendable'' "does far more to demonstrate the workability and morality of the ] than a dozen sober tomes on more respectable industries and activities. By testing and proving the extreme cases, he all the more illustrates and vindicates the theory."<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=https://mises.org/library/defending-undefendable|title=Defending the Undefendable|date=August 18, 2014|website=Mises Institute|access-date=August 21, 2017|archive-date=September 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200913051841/https://mises.org/library/defending-undefendable|url-status=live}}</ref>

Libertarian activist ] had a more mixed/critical take, agreeing with large parts of it but calling it "a bizarre combination of both excellent and horrible elements". She offered some praise for its "valid economic and political analysis” but also criticised its "sensationalistic style", several instances of "faulty logic", and its overly "mechanistic and insensitive view of human behavior". She feared it might ultimately act to discredit the ideas it was meant to promote, concluding that it is "a positive menace to the libertarian movement and dramatically demonstrates ] statement that the worst enemies of capitalism are its defenders."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Presley |first1=Sharon |title=Defending the Undefendable |url=https://reason.com/1977/02/01/defending-the-undefendable/ |accessdate=7 September 2020 |work=Reason |issue=February 1977 |archive-date=19 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919071013/https://reason.com/1977/02/01/defending-the-undefendable/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

Cable news pundit ] said of it, "Defending the Undefendable... opened my eyes to the beauties of ]. It explains that so much of what is assumed to be evil – is not."<ref>'']'', December 2006, p. 37.</ref> In 2011, writing that economics "illuminates what common sense overlooks", Stossel called the book "eye-opening" and detailed its contents.<ref>], {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170702113323/http://reason.com/archives/2011/08/25/almost-everything-were-taught |date=2017-07-02 }}, ], August 25, 2011.</ref>

The philosopher ], who generally shared Block's libertarian leanings, wrote that the book "defends some of the silliest ideas in support of an essentially good cause... He raises some stimulating issues, even if in an intellectually inadequate fashion."<ref name="auto"/>

==Further reading==
* ] '']'', Vol. 65, No. 2, April 2006, pp.&nbsp;463–467. {{JSTOR|27739570}}.


==References== ==References==
Line 24: Line 42:


== External links == == External links ==
* . Online edition, by ] * . Online edition, by ]
* {{LCCN|74021359}} * {{LCCN|74021359}}
{{Portal bar|Law|Philosophy|Society}}


] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 17:28, 29 April 2024

1976 book by Walter Block
Defending the Undefendable
First edition
AuthorWalter Block
LanguageEnglish
SubjectMoral philosophy, political economy
PublisherFleet Press
Publication date1976
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Paperback)
Pages256
ISBN9781933550176
OCLC248638106
Dewey Decimal973.925
LC ClassHB95 .B58
Followed byDefending the Undefendable II: Freedom in All Realms 
TextDefending the Undefendable at Ludwig von Mises Institute

Defending the Undefendable is a 1976 book by American economist Walter Block. It has been translated into ten foreign languages. The book advances the thesis that various people are stigmatized for engaging in acts that are often illegal or disreputable yet do not involve violence or violation of property. Block further proposes these people may in fact benefit society. Each chapter examines a different type of person, including prostitutes, blackmailers, misers and litterers.

The original edition included illustrations by Charles Rodrigues and a foreword from Murray Rothbard, with commentary provided by F. A. Hayek.

The book's 2013 sequel, Defending the Undefendable II: Freedom in All Realms, included a foreword by Ron Paul.

Reception

Economist Murray Rothbard thought that by emphasizing marginal scenarios, Defending the Undefendable "does far more to demonstrate the workability and morality of the free market than a dozen sober tomes on more respectable industries and activities. By testing and proving the extreme cases, he all the more illustrates and vindicates the theory."

Libertarian activist Sharon Presley had a more mixed/critical take, agreeing with large parts of it but calling it "a bizarre combination of both excellent and horrible elements". She offered some praise for its "valid economic and political analysis” but also criticised its "sensationalistic style", several instances of "faulty logic", and its overly "mechanistic and insensitive view of human behavior". She feared it might ultimately act to discredit the ideas it was meant to promote, concluding that it is "a positive menace to the libertarian movement and dramatically demonstrates Rand's statement that the worst enemies of capitalism are its defenders."

Cable news pundit John Stossel said of it, "Defending the Undefendable... opened my eyes to the beauties of libertarianism. It explains that so much of what is assumed to be evil – is not." In 2011, writing that economics "illuminates what common sense overlooks", Stossel called the book "eye-opening" and detailed its contents.

The philosopher Tibor Machan, who generally shared Block's libertarian leanings, wrote that the book "defends some of the silliest ideas in support of an essentially good cause... He raises some stimulating issues, even if in an intellectually inadequate fashion."

Further reading

References

  1. Walter Block, Defending the Undefendable Archived 2014-06-28 at the Wayback Machine book reprint, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008 version.
  2. Walter Block faculty page Archived 2013-11-23 at the Wayback Machine, Loyola University New Orleans, accessed July 31, 2013.
  3. ISBN 978-1908089373, OCLC 923198764
  4. ^ "Defending the Undefendable". Mises Institute. August 18, 2014. Archived from the original on September 13, 2020. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  5. Presley, Sharon. "Defending the Undefendable". Reason. No. February 1977. Archived from the original on 19 September 2020. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
  6. American Spectator, December 2006, p. 37.
  7. John Stossel, "Almost Everything We're Taught Is Wrong, Using economics to explode fallacies" Archived 2017-07-02 at the Wayback Machine, Reason, August 25, 2011.

External links

Portals: Categories: