| Revision as of 13:29, 18 June 2006 editFrater FiatLux (talk | contribs)566 edits →Involved parties: Removal of user Zos extraneous comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018 edit undoRGloucester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers38,757 edits rdr to mainTag: New redirect | ||
| (516 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{/Rfm-header}} <!-- Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header --> | |||
| <br style="clear:both;"> | |||
| ==Instructions== | |||
| '''New requests should be listed at , right below the template sample. All requests must use the template provided below.''' | |||
| *] provides an explanation for how to file a request. | |||
| *] shows the template with instructions. | |||
| *] has a description of common reasons for rejecting requests. | |||
| '''All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected.''' Please watch this page during the time the case is listed here; if additional information is required, you will be asked here, and expected to respond within the 7 day period. | |||
| <div style="background: #f5f5f5;"> | |||
| == Case name (Sample)== | |||
| ---- | |||
| <center><big>Do not edit this section! Copy the text of this section into another section and edit that.<br />Edits to this section will be reverted immediately.</big></center> | |||
| ---- | |||
| ===Involved parties=== | |||
| *{{user|Example}} | |||
| *{{user|Example}} | |||
| '''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:''' | |||
| Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{tl|RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties. | |||
| :'''Article talk pages:''' | |||
| :*] | |||
| :'''User talk pages:''' | |||
| :*] | |||
| ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | |||
| *] link | |||
| *] discussion | |||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *Issue 1 | |||
| *Issue 2 | |||
| ===Additional issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *Additional issue 1 | |||
| *Additional issue 2 | |||
| ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | |||
| :''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. '''Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.''''' | |||
| *Agree. | |||
| ===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== | |||
| *'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.) | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.) | |||
| ---- | |||
| <center><big>Your case should look just like this when you have finished filing;</br>no commentary, no extra information, just what is required in this template.<br />'''If you choose to ignore these instructions, your case will likewise be ignored. ].'''</big></center> | |||
| ---- | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==New Requests== | |||
| <center><big>'''New requests immediately below this line.'''</big></center> | |||
| ==Neo-fascism== | |||
| ===Involved parties=== | |||
| *{{user|Cberlet}} | |||
| *{{user|Intangible}} | |||
| '''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:''' | |||
| :'''Article talk pages:''' | |||
| :*] | |||
| :'''User talk pages:''' | |||
| :*] | |||
| ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | |||
| *] | |||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *A dispute concerning the presence or absence of neo-fascism in the United States. ] feels that some published material should simply be deleted. | |||
| ===Additional issues to be mediated=== | |||
| None | |||
| ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | |||
| :''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. '''Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.''''' | |||
| *Agree. --] 02:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Agree. | |||
| ===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== | |||
| *'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.) | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' (Mediation Committee members only.) | |||
| == Three Articles == | |||
| ], ], ]. | |||
| ===Involved parties=== | |||
| *{{user|Frater FiatLux}} | |||
| *{{user|Zanoni666}} | |||
| *{{user|Kephera975}} | |||
| *{{user|Opuaut }} : This user was blocked indefinetly. ] 05:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *{{user|JMax555}} | |||
| *{{user|999}} | |||
| *] - Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page. | |||
| *{{user|Ehheh}} | |||
| '''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:''' | |||
| Provide diffs showing where {{tl|RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and was placed on the talk pages of the other parties. | |||
| :'''Article talk pages:''' | |||
| *] | |||
| ** | |||
| *] | |||
| ** | |||
| *] | |||
| ** | |||
| :'''User talk pages:''' | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] | |||
| :*] Also known as: SynergeticMaggot, both these Users have the same talk page and user page. | |||
| :*] | |||
| ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | |||
| Incessant discussion, in which neither parties can achieve a coherent consensus. There have been repeated attempts at discussions on the disputation with relevant parties, but thus far, is without success or agreement. Editing and Revert warring mainly taking precedence over discussion. | |||
| I have tried on many occasions to contact administrators and left messages on the administration board and asked for the articles to be locked down so that edit/revert wars could cease and proper discussion and proposals could begin. | |||
| ::I'm double indenting to show I did not write the above. We have tried to reach consensus on at least two of the pages that Frater FiatLux has requested mediation on. ] 05:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | |||
| Note to parties: Per the instructions, issues should be listed as bullet statements of actual issues to be mediated. Commentary on the nature of the conflict should be reserved for after the request has been accepted. Please provide the issues to be mediated in the form required. <span style="font-family: Verdana">] <font color="#7b68ee">(<small>] • ]</small>)</font></span> 05:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | |||
| '''Agree''': ] 22:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Agree''': - ] 23:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Status of religious freedom in Canada== | |||
| ===Involved parties=== | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ===Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request=== | |||
| ====Article talk pages==== | |||
| :*] | |||
| : | |||
| ===='''User talk pages==== | |||
| :*] and again | |||
| ===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | |||
| :Attempted discussions on the dispute with new user without success. | |||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *DRCarroll did not like the way the article was originally written. He seeks to delete major sections and add what he sees as the other side of the story. Deet feels many of the facts deleted (e.g., Corren) are important in any discussion of religious freedom in Canada and that DRCarroll's edits are generally not aligned with the topic name itself. This has resulted in a major revert war. | |||
| ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | |||
| *] - agrees. | |||
| ==Use of images at List of Virtual Boy games== | |||
| {{/Rejected|10:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Exploding Boy and nathanrdotcom (Nathan)== | |||
| {{/Rejected|06:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Messianic Judaism == | |||
| {{/Format|05:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Neo-Tech == | |||
| ===Involved parties=== | |||
| *{{user|RJII}} | |||
| *{{user|Bi}} | |||
| '''Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:''' | |||
| :'''Article talk pages:''' | |||
| :*'''User talk pages:''' | |||
| :*===Other steps in ] that have been attempted:=== | |||
| * | |||
| ===Issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *This concerns the article, ]. Bi claims that books published by Integrated Management Associates (a company that publishes material about a philosophy called Neo-Tech) cannot be used as references for the article about Neo-Tech ("''Incidentally, the rules also say that "self-published books" are unacceptable as sources. Well, I think I'm going to throw out lots of stuff that come only from Neo-Tech's self-publications. Bi 10:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)''"), which is bizarre becase it's the only sources on the philosophy. Lest there be any doubt, ] plainly says: ''Self-published sources, and published sources of dubious reliability, may be used only as sources of information on themselves, and only in articles about them. For example, the Stormfront website may be used as a source of information on itself in an article about Stormfront, so long as the information is notable, not unduly self-aggrandizing, and not contradicted by reliable, third-party published sources. Self-published sources may never be used as sources of information on another person or topic.'' Of course you can use the books as sources about the philosophy, in the article about the philosophy! Otherwise, the article would be blank! (As an aside, I'd like to note that the company also publishes the work of other writers not associated with the company as well). Also, he sources "criticism" of Neo-Tech from web forums, self-published web pages, etc rather than from credible published sources. He expressed a desire for form dispute resolution, as have I. Please assist enforcing the Misplaced Pages policies on sourcing. It should be pretty simple and straightforward to mediate this. Thank you. ] 01:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Additional issues to be mediated=== | |||
| *Thank you. In addition to being self-published, the Neo-Tech literature can be considered to be "unduly self-aggrandizing", which ] does not allow. Besides, given that Neo-Tech literature is self-published and self-aggrandizing, it would seem unfair to use a different standard for admitting views opposed to Neo-Tech. ] 06:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Parties' agreement to mediate=== | |||
| :''All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.'' | |||
| *Agree. ] 03:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Agree. ] 06:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Decision of the Mediation Committee=== | |||
| *'''Accept/Reject/Extend''': | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' | |||
| *'''Chairman's note:''' ''Recuse'' from involvement. Another member of the committee will need to accept/reject the case and assign a mediator. <span style="font-family:Sans serif">] <font color="#7b68ee">(<small>] • ]</small>)</font></span> 06:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Comments''' | |||
| :: NOw I see ] is a disambiguatio npage. Which one is this mediation about? -- <small> ]</small> 12:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::] ] 05:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Archives== | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Archives}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 12 November 2018
Redirect to: