Talk:Architecture of Russia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:10, 19 June 2006 editAndriyK (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 edits →unexplained tag ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:17, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,272,802 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: By geographic location.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(150 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1=
	{{Architecture}}
			{{WikiProject Architecture\|importance=Top}}
			{{WikiProject Russia\| importance = Top\| art = yes\| hist = yes\| tech = yes}}
			{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors}}
			}}
			{{Archive box\|auto=yes}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|maxarchivesize = 100K
			\|counter = 2
			\|minthreadsleft = 5
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|algo = old(90d)
			\|archive = Talk:Architecture of Russia/Archive %(counter)d
			}}

			==File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
	{{Architecture SA}}
			{\|
			\|-
			\| ]
			\| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests September 2011''
			;What should I do?
			''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
			* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
			* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.

			''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 15:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
	]
			\|}
	==Problems with the article==
			==File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
	: This article is not suitable as an encyclopaedia article, as it is in violation of Misplaced Pages's ] (NPOV) policy, and is written in a very non-encyclopaedic tone. In addition if it's from a website, it might be a ]. Please do something to address these problems, or the article might be deleted as per Misplaced Pages's ]. - ] ] 18:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
			{\|
			\|-
			\| ]
			\| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests May 2012''
			;What should I do?
			''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
			* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
			* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.
			To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant ]

			''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --] (]) 13:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
	'''Architectural landmarks erected in the country of RUS, regradless of prefixes and suffixes, must be called RUSSIAN (RUS+IAN, adjective, belonging to RUS)!'''
			\|}

			== External links modified ==
	==Article completely rewritten==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	This article was completely rewritten after the article that the above comments refer to was speedy deleted after being listed for deletion. ] 12:26, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
	:Nice work on the article. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></sup></small> 16:30, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050818065003/http://www.bartleby.com/65/ru/RussianA.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/ru/Russiana.html
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021030808/http://www.skypalace.org/europe/slavic/east_slavic/russia.shtml to http://www.skypalace.org/europe/slavic/east_slavic/russia.shtml

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	== Readings ==

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	I went to the library this afternoon and had a look at the following books:

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 04:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
	* (2003) Entry "Architecture: Kievan Rus and Russia" in ''Encyclopædia Britannica (Macropedia) vol. 13,'' 15th ed., p. 921.
	: The article is "Architecture", the section is called "Kievan Rus and Russia". The state is referred to as Kievan Rus, but the churches of Rus are referred to in aggregate as "Russian ecclesiastical architecture".

			== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion ==
	* William Craft Brumfield ( 2004). ''A History of Russian Architecture,'' Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-98393-0.
			The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
	: Nice book, with photographs by the author. The subject is referred to in the text as "medieval Russian architecture", but the people and state of the period are called "eastern Slavs", and note "medieval Rus and subsequently Russia".
			* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy \| 2020-06-20T08:55:03.974433 \| RIAN archive 850726 XXV Congress of the CPSU.jpg -->
			You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —] (]) 08:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

			==Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History==
	* John Fleming, Hugh Honour, Nikolaus Pevsner ( 1998). Entry "Russian Architecture" in ''The Penguin Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape Architecture'', 5th ed., pp. 493–498, London: Penguin. ISBN 0-67-088017-5.
			{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment \| course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Miami/Imperial_Russian_History_(Fall_2022) \| assignments = ] \| reviewers = ], ] \| start_date = 2022-08-23 \| end_date = 2022-12-06 }}
	: Under the entry "Russian Architecture". References to the subject and period in general are "Russia", "the Old Russian state", "Kievan Russia", "Transfiguration Cathedral at Chernigov (c. 1036) . . . and all other Old Russian churches . . . ", but Kievan Rus’ specifically is called "Kiev", also "the Kiev Prince". Polotsk and Smolensk are in "west Russian lands". Later references are to "Moscow's domination of Russia", "Muscovite architecture".
	: (Interesting quote about the Baroque period: ". . . ] has its own characteristics, however, and stylistically the interaction with Muscovy is less significant than was once thought.")

			<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 16:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)</span>
	I would classify these all as post-Soviet editions of earlier writing. They seem to know that Kievan Rus’ is not the same thing as Russia, and refer to the state as Rus or Kiev, although it is also referred to descriptively as "medieval Russia". Russia is used for the name of later states, but in all three sources the architecture of Rus belongs firmly within the subject of Russian architecture. There is no subdivision of Rus architecture into Belarusian, Russian, or Ukrainian.

	In the next day or two I'll propose some revisions to the article based on this, if someone else hasn't done so already. ''—] ] <small>2005-11-21 00:08 Z</small>''

	:Nice job. Thanks. --] 00:22, 21 November 2005 (UTC)





	----
	I've found a lovely image of a Russian monastery. Perhaps there's room for it in your article? ] 00:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
	:Yes!!! Of course!--] 01:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

	] in ] (photo from ]).]]

	----

	== Bepassing the dispute ==

	Whilst I not going to get myself involved in your (to be fair quite pathetic) arguments. I would like to give the following site with excellent photos of Orthodox architecure for those who are intersted in cotributing professional information: http://www.sobory.ru/

	-- ] 15:32, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

	== Why only tamples and churches? ==

	Why only tamples and churches? What about citadels, towers, palaces?--] 01:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

	BTW, why there is no "]" article?--] 01:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

	: Get to work. ''—] ] <small>2005-12-14 07:24 Z</small>''




	==My proposal for the future of the article==
	I propose that this article has some radical changes. The truth is that like History of Russia, it is impossible to generalise everything into one article without having seprate articles reflecting each phase. In Russian architecture there are clear break-ups. THis site here has a feature were one can actually search through the dates when each building was built. We might be also able to obtain copyrights for several images if lucky. I propose the following strucutre:
	A general page (which this article can provide) Then about individual subarticles describing the individual phases of history. Now for those nationally conscious little people, there should destinct and separate subarticles for periods of history for your phase.
	*So this is what we get:
	:#Three general articles (maybe more) Architectures of Russia, Belarus, Ukraine
	:#Broken into phases of history:
	::#Kievan Rus
	::#Grand Duchy of Lithuania/Halych/Muscouvian Rus (and their respecive styles)
	::#Polish Lithuanian Boroque/Ukrainian Boroque/Muscovian Boroque
	::#...and so on
	::#Stalinist Architecutre
	::#Post-Stalinist Soviet architecture
	::#Late Soviet Architecture
	::#Modern Architecture of Ukraine/Russia/Belarus
	:#Each subarticle talks about decorative features, Churches, Fortifications, Palaces, Terema and so on...
	Here is some info on styles

	--] 22:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

	==Unexplained tag insertion==
	I see that AndriyK's mission after the return to Misplaced Pages from the ] is to keep trolling this article. On one hand, this is much better than large scale moving nightmare and vote rigging which got him in trouble previously. OTOH, I see no activity from this user other than occasionally showing up here and there, run some quick but fierce edit wars just under the 3RR and disappear for another week or so. This is untenable.

	The tag removal has been explained multiple times. Reasons were discussed, the article RfC was filed, users commented, MichaelZ spent hours in the library due to AndriyK's persistence with nonsense ideas. The public spoke over the issue he raised and the tag was removed.

	Yet, it is restored either by himself, or others who choose to act as his proxies in his shameful quest to expunge anything Russian from everything related to Ukraine. Please care to read past discussion and clearly point out the reasons behind the tag reinsertion which were not addressed by the past discussion. I hope others will reconsider acting as AndriyK's proxies. If others have an issue after having read the past discussions and insist on tagging, please use talk to explain your POV disagreement. Same applies to AndriyK. If he has anything new to say, he is welcome to do so at the talk page. Finally, if AndriyK reinserts the tag one more time without entering his grievances at talk (taking into account past discussions) and/or his explanation will seem frivolous, I will file a specific ] with an ArbCom. ArbCom cases often have unintended consequences as ArbCom members sometimes rule not only on specific issues, but more generally on the user's behavior and a block may very well be a consequences of a new arbitration. For one, it is not my intention to have AndriyK blocked, whatever stuff he dumps on me all the time. Another issue is that I would hate wasting time on this yet again. But I see no other venue to bring this article to normalcy with the tag being reinserted and the tagger's refusal to use talk. RfC was not sufficient. All kinds of dispute resolution was tried. ArbCom would be the last resort. --] 08:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	:The reseons for inserting the tag are explained in the tag itself. Please read.
	:The fact that you explained your personal opinion about removal of the tag does not mean that the issue is resolved. Your opponents may disagree with your personal opinion. And, in fact, this was the case.
	:There is no need to say anything new here. The problem that I pointed out half a year ago is still not solved.
	:I propose the solution, you did not accept it. You do not propose any acceptable alternative solution.
	:The only way out is to keep the tag until somebody proposes an acceptable solution for both sides.
	:Please read once more what another user wrote to you ] --] 08:26, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	::There was a vote, a poll which culminated in DROPPING the issue permanentely ] Find it there. As of then the MAJORITY of wikipedians are AGAINST any more disputes. They are FINE as it is. If you want a another poll start one here and ask it '''Do you see any point continuing the dispute between AndriyK's POV (and his maidan goonies) and the rest of wikipedian society?''' Extend the notification to the whole ] and go for it. It is not an issue anymore wether the buildings will be mentioned, previous poll but a fat tochka on that it is wether your POV-pushing continues. --] ] 10:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	:::Read what you moved in archive ] --] 10:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
	::::Makes no difference to the stance. If I was you I would write Ukrainian architecture and then simply interlink them into this article that way there will be no problem, but of course how many useful articles have you written (sorry but your contributions page is so full of worthless conflicts that it really is impossible to filter) or can you ever right them? --] ] 11:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	:::::I have to explain you once more. There is a unsolved problem with the article ].
	:::::Whether i article on Ukrainian architecture or not is my choice.
	:::::I tried to write articles here, but your troll friends prevent me from doing it.--] 11:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	::::::You tried? Really? Молодец, садись -енко/-чюк, пять. :) Although I find that if one makes writing articles a priority and leaving the policing of wikipedia to the admins which is clearely the opposite of your case, then at least people can have an opinion of you as a valuable contributor as opposed to a troll. Experience shows that useful contributors are more successful at gaining favouralbe outcomes on disputes. If I were you I'd reregister a new account and start all over. User:AnriyK's reputation is a shame of the Ukrainian society and even if you start writing articles now there is little to salvage. Стыд и срам.--] ] 13:44, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
	I see AndriyK reinserted the tag. Everyone, please do not remove it or alter it in any way until the issue is referred to ArbCom. I will try to be as fast as I can. --] 19:03, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	== Page protection ==

	There has been no actual change to the content of this article since before the last page protection on March 31. Every single edit since then has been to either (1) insert or (2) remove the NPOV tag. Until this gets cleared up on the talk page for good, I don't feel like I'm stopping any earth-shattering developments by protecting the page. (])<sup>(])</sup> 22:04, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

	<nowiki>{{editprotected}}</nowiki>

	:I think an edit needs to be made. In that ludicrous looking POV tag it currently reads:
	::''it describes the structures that were build by ancestors of the present-day Greeks and Ukrainians in Kievan Rus...''
	:Is it possible to have that replaced with:
	::''it describes the structures that were buil'''t''' by ancestors of the present-day Greeks and Ukrainians in Kievan Rus...''
	:Thanks. ] 10:19, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
	:::Done ] 14:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

	==unexplained tag==
	A single user persisting with a nonsense claim is no reason to destroy excellent articles with ridiculous tags. When whoever who thinks that the ] tags the ] article because it represents the "Earth is round POV", the tag would similarly be removed without discussion.

	If AndriyK can come up with new reasons on why the article is not NPOV, he should bring them at talk. His old points prompted much discussion, much research through the most authoritative literature and were rejected based on that as well as the vote. Until new points are brought up, I am removing the tag. --] 02:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

	:I do not think that the dispute is as obvious as about the shape of the Earth (see, for instance, ). I would not remove the tag without discussion if I would you. It would be much better to find a compromise solution.--] 23:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

	::The dispute is settled, if you look in the archive, all of the points raised by the opposing party were overturned. I propose to unlock the article and permanentely purge the tag. --] ] 10:10, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

	:::A dispute is settled if
	:::*a decission that satisfies both sides is found or
	:::*there is a decission by some authority (ArbCom in the present case) that is compulsory for both sides even if they do not agree with it.
	:::This was not the case. Therefore, the present dispute has not been resolved yet. Let's take the next step.--] 08:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

	To Irpen: there is no new reasons. The old dispute has not been resolve yet. Please note that removing the tag (and even locking the page without it) does not resolve the dispute. Let's follow ].--] 08:10, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:17, 20 October 2024

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / History Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Russian architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

RIAN archive 850726 XXV Congress of the CPSU.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 6 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ToriTrouble (article contribs). Peer reviewers: CIN513, Norgusbjorgus.

— Assignment last updated by Soviethistorian (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: