| Revision as of 14:00, 6 February 2014 editRing Cinema (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers6,691 edits Undid revision 594211234 by Ring Cinema (talk) cleanup← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:41, 27 March 2024 edit undoAndrybak (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors81,034 edits →top: add Template:Not around – user Ring Cinema hasn't edited since 2015 (using Not around v4.4-unpublished) | ||
| (182 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|date=2015}} | |||
| ] ] | ] ] | ||
| {{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 70K | |maxarchivesize = 70K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 6 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 4 | |minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | ||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| == Notice of article editing and justifications : THE ENGLISH PATIENT == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| I believe these changes are in line with both the efforts of W. for appropriate article content that best presents the intent of the subject and should it be found they do not meet standards then I will take the issue up with the review board in order to get a better understanding as to just what role do individuals serve in this effort. | |||
| ORIGINAL: In the final days of World War II, Hana, a French-Canadian nurse in an abandoned Italian monastery looks after a critically burned man who speaks English but is reluctant to disclose any personal information. | |||
| REPLACEMENT: World War II waning finds the French-Canadian Hana nursing, in a bombed Italian monastery, a critically burned English-speaking man avoiding disclosure of personal information. | |||
| JUSTIFICATION: | |||
| Waning means coming to an end and adequately sets the war time frame in five words instead of the eight. | |||
| "Abandoned" does not adequately convey the monastery's condition. It was abandoned, yes, but the uncertain safety of it, which may very well be a reason for it being people less, better conveys by being described as bombed which can convey also that the site was not safe therefore people less. Even Hana is warned of marauders when taking on the task. "Nursing" conveys both what she is doing and most likely her role in the war and eliminates "looks after" which is an aspect of nursing. | |||
| "Critically burned English-speaking man" conveys with less words than "a critically burned man who speaks English" The use of "but" implies that being "a critically burned man who speaks English" is the reasoning behind "is reluctant to disclose any personal information." It is not. He could have other reasons: trauma memory loss, embarrassment, a personal preference? Also, "avoiding disclosure of personal information" says in five what the original says in seven words.A1Houseboy (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :We can discuss this on the talk page. --] (]) 02:05, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::FYI, see ]. Regards, ] (]) 15:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re: '']'' - Undid revision 591633596 by ClanCularius: out of place== | |||
| It sounds as though you have no objection to identifying the Chigurh character as a psychopath, but you would like to see the reference placed elsewhere. I believe it belongs in this article (specifically describing the film version of ''No Country for Old Men'') at a minimum, to provide in-article support for the categorization "Category:Films about psychopaths" found at the bottom of the page. Other WP film articles have identified characters as psychopaths in various places within the WP film article template, from the lede (e.g., ]) to '''Plot''' (as I originally placed it on this article, for example, or as found in ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and others), '''Synopsis''' (e.g., ]), '''Production''' (e.g., ]), '''Cast''' (e.g., ]), and others. There appears to be no pattern or fixed rule. | |||
| My major goal in this change is to anchor and justify the article's categorization of "Category:Films about psychopaths" by providing an explicit reference to an acceptable source, so I had not intended to add much material to the article. Meeting this goal doesn't seem to require a paragraph or even a full sentence, but I am not sure where in the article you will find it acceptable to add the brief description "psychopath" and the supporting reference. Please let me know what you had in mind - thanks for the interest and the comment. ] (]) 18:40, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Maybe that material would fit in the section on the character. (Chigurh may have his own page, too.) For the plot summary, I feel it is better to stick to the action of the film and studiously avoid conclusions. If he is a sociopath, the evidence is in his behavior and we can squeeze as much of that into the plot section as feasible. If you believe he is a psychopath, my question for you is, How do you know? That's what belongs in the plot summary. Thanks. --] (]) 20:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Sleuth/Deathtrap Dispute Resolution Noticeboard discussion == | |||
| :: Thanks for your response. As I mentioned above and ], I am working to reflect recently published results of researchers analyzing the accurate (or inaccurate) depiction of psychopathic behavior by film characters. That research anchors and justifies the article's categorization of "Category:Films about psychopaths", which (in this article) was present before I initially added the reference that kicked off this discussion. The article on ] addresses his behavior as depicted both in the novel and in the film, and does not appear to be the right place to put the categorization "Category:Films about psychopaths". This article on the film appears to be the right place to embed the research reference. | |||
| == August 2015 == | |||
| :: Following your suggestion, I will place the term "psychopathic" and the appropriate reference in this article's section '''Cast'''. (I am inferring this is the place you refer to as "the section on the character".) I am not certain regarding the Misplaced Pages protocol for the wider application of this standard to the articles where the terms "psychopath" and "psychopathic" already appear in the lede, '''Plot''', '''Synopsis''', or other sections. Will you be addressing them, or is it expected that I should do so, or are they best left as they stand? Thanks for your advice. ] (]) 21:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ] 16:11, 27 September 2025 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1758989496}} | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''one month''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 02:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC) <span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'><big>'''S'''</big><small>'''''warm'''''</small></span>]] ] 00:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
| Another idiot admin who doesn't know the policy of Misplaced Pages. Good job, Swarm, you stupidly blocked me for returning the page to the last consensus. That's what we're supposed to do in the case of a content dispute. Yes, I know, that is so hard to learn! Another moron example of how admins are the sickness of Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 02:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|reason=Swarm very stupidly failed to follow policy. While that is a very common problem with admins, this is an obvious case. Good editors like me don't have time to waste with morons like Swarm. I expect an apology and a prompt reversal. | |||
| ::::Thank you for your interest, and I hope your question is not the type of query that would hide under bridges to commit blood crimes on yokels and their livestock. | |||
| |decline=Due to ], your block has been extended indefinitely. ] (]) 04:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Due to your stupidity, you are banned from having an opinion. LOL. Let's be clear, pea brain: I create value on Misplaced Pages and I've done that for years. Moron admins like you are afraid of your shadows because you are told the truth. Okay, so you all are the disease of Misplaced Pages. You are ruining WP because of your incompetence. All right, now you know. Now lift my block and stop proving you're over your head with a thimble of power. I expect you to correct your stupid error by the end of the day. --] (]) 12:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| }}--] (]) 03:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> | |||
| ::::In some very general sense you may be asking why we want an online reference mechanism that links reputable research to widely-known terms, works, and memes of popular culture. "Why does IMDb exist?" you might cry. "Misplaced Pages? Google, for that matter?" I would suggest that these tools evidently support some human needs or they would not consume so many of our resources in time, attention, and effort. The fact that you have mastered WP's formidable interface implies that you already support the concept of an online reference mechanism with the features just described. Your question must therefore be more subtle in its implications. | |||
| ] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.''' | |||
| <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ] • ] • • }} • ] • • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()) </span> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the ]'s '']''.<br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> | |||
| == Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest! == | |||
| ::::At one level, your activity in this article might imply you have already observed that the detailed descriptions of filmic characters provide a continual stream of interest and entertainment for film watchers. Just to pick the nearest example, the ''Goldfinger'' article mentions many filmic character traits apart from psychopathy that may interest one or more Misplaced Pages readers: Goldfinger is wealthy - is a man - is obsessed with gold; Mr. Simmons is gullible; Tilly Masterson is vengeful. | |||
| {{Ivmbox|] | |||
| ::::Looking more deeply into your question, perhaps you are wondering why these characteristics are mentioned in the WP article. Why is it written that Goldfinger is wealthy, implied to be successful at some capital-generating enterprise (however criminal), and therefore exhibiting complex behavior that some might claim is constructed for purposes unrelated to the ostensible aims of the film? Who has documented the ostensible aims of the film, that we may solve this conundrum? Why, in any constructed discourse, should it be said that Goldfinger loves . . . gold? Deep questions, indeed, though - to a simple film fan, for example - perhaps irrelevant or unnecessary. | |||
| Greetings! | |||
| ] invites you to join us again this October and November, ] about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. | |||
| ::::Even deeper, why do other characters have their own personal characteristics, in this or any work of popular media? Why do characters have unique names? Why do characters even exist? At the risk of oversimplifying a potentially rich and wide-ranging discussion of fiction, meta-narrative, and the post-modern meaning of "meaning", I conjecture in general that fans of the genre or of popular culture in the greater sense demand this sort of content from the media they consume (both the original source media, i.e., the film ''Goldfinger'', and secondary or tertiary sources like reviews, scholarly papers, and Misplaced Pages). Needless to say, I cannot answer for you in particular. | |||
| Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly ] to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. | |||
| ::::There is an hypothetical "I" that self-identifies as an amateur of cinema. I watch well over 400 films a year. I am deeply interested in films, books, and printed graphic works containing representations of mystery, suspense, action, violence, and evil. In these characteristics, I am not alone - that is, I represent a cohort, not insignificant in size, of the popular media consumer. Is it really a mystery that I am likewise interested in the nature of the characters I watch every night? That I want to know why they act as they do? That I am curious about the authenticity of a director's vision or of an actor's interpretation of the script? That I wonder whether real people like the ones depicted actually exist, and actually behave as depicted? My real and representative interests alone may answer your question. | |||
| We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners: | |||
| ::::On a slightly less post-modern note, the research paper earlier referenced was discussed at the local university's faculty club last weekend. It was immediately apparent that the list of films chosen by the researchers was skewed or incomplete in significant ways. I raised from memory ten or more films of the last fifteen years from Korea, Japan, and south-east Asia that were better suited for this sort of study than many of the films originally selected by the researchers. Someone else wondered at the poor showing of Hong Kong or mainland Chinese films on my list and on the list defined by the original researchers: is there a cultural or other bias at work on the part of the researchers, or are the involved film-makers avoiding psychopathic characters for reasons yet unknown? | |||
| *'''''Overall winner''''' | |||
| ::::It became my responsibility to find other candidate films for further formal or informal research, so I came to WP for leads. It is clear that the adjective "psychopathic" and the noun "psychopath" are much more liberally interpreted on Misplaced Pages than the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, in Hare's PCL-R test for psychopathy, or in related professional tools. Many filmic characters displaying clear and consistent traits of psychopathy, such as Auric Goldfinger in this film, are not identified as psychopathic in WP. Many other filmic characters, including some explicitly rejected by the researchers for displaying inauthentic or no characteristics of this mental condition, are labeled psychopathic. I felt that . | |||
| **1st - $500 | |||
| **2nd - $200 | |||
| **3rd - $100 | |||
| *'''''Diversity winner''''' - $100 | |||
| *'''''Gender-gap fillers''''' - $100 | |||
| *'''''Language Winners''''' - up to $100* | |||
| We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page ]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--] (]) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)}} | |||
| ::::As a predictable but unfortunate result, I came to believe that some users of WP exhibit a curious "psycho-blindness", to coin a novel and quite unnecessary term. They disbelieve and reject incoming information that suggests their preconceptions about psychopathic behavior, richly and inaccurately fed by WP itself, may be inconsistent with formally completed, reviewed, and published scientific research. I find this sad, yet I believe it's somehow avoidable. Surely there must be a way to clarify the meaning and implications of these scientific terms, perhaps in reference to works of popular culture that are widely accessible and may even be familiar to the WP users in question. More complete and more accurate information on psychopaths in film might help in some way! But where can we put it? | |||
| <small>''Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from ]''</small> | |||
| ::::To wrap up, and again in reference to your question, I suspect you know where we can put it. I hope you can agree that someone is interested in almost any type of information, and that in the inclusive universe of the Web it may be worthwhile meeting that need. Structuring the discourse to satisfy the varied and sometimes incomprehensible interests of other humans may be challenging, but is ultimately worthwhile. A life, or even a half-hour, documenting something of interest to someone is conspicuously more valuable to the Web than one spent in protocoloholic gateclosing. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=20471120 --> | |||
| == Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest! == | |||
| ::::I cannot myself comfortably take on a role as gatecloser, to campaign that the Web be purged of references to items I personally don't find interesting, reducing its size and general usefulness by a trillion times. I respect the nature and choices of others in this regard and humbly suggest that if someone is so interested as to learn Misplaced Pages's crappy editing UI, to grasp however feebly the mass of written and unwritten rules of combat, to research content, and to overcome WP's many other barriers against entry, then the benefit of my doubt is their freedom to document those areas of the universe that they find interesting. I hope I have not, in making this response, alienated or offended you. And I hope that you understand my answer to your question. ] (]) 02:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|] | |||
| :::::Thanks for the response. You are correct that WP offers information to readers, but not exactly spot on that designations of 'psychopath' applied to fictional characters share the same epistemological status as the rest of its material. The film can be understood equally, it seems, with or without determining Chigurh's clinical condition. In fact, if no one had said anything about his "diagnosis", the story retains all of its values, and if in the future there is a debate among professionals about whether or not he is a psychopath that leads to widespread agreement that he is not, none of the fictional elements of the film are changed. No one in the film responds to Chigurh qua psychopath. However, nothing could change the fact that the film is set in Texas, even if the state was annexed by Australia and renamed "New Outback". So, a plot summary should say what happens in the film and psychopathology is not a subject of the film or an element in the plot. --] (]) 12:54, 22 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Greetings! | |||
| == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 11:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] core team is happy to inform you that the ] Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Misplaced Pages! | |||
| == Unusual phrases from four editors == | |||
| Please ] of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean. | |||
| A1Houseboy: "Did any one block the meaning of those three words from being used to clarify the understanding that the "burned man" and the "dashing archaeologist" were the same. The answer is no by the potential solutions to be found stated in the Discussion section." | |||
| The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest: | |||
| SharpQuillPen: "Personally, not knowing all the little details one might when you grow up in a particular environment learn, there is a lot that is need to become familiar in order to get a better understand as to how to place what happens in the film with real life since there are some scenes that all you know is that they followed in the film but you do not know during when so you just have to accept on nuance." | |||
| *'''''Overall winner''''' | |||
| WordwrightUSA: "Mastery seems to be a perception that you hold high your craft of composition but evidently that mastery doers not include the means by which your characterizations are expressed for nullification. Please attempt by all means possible the absence of what can only truly and accurately be attributed your own attitude towards things that make it an avenue by which you to exhibit." | |||
| **1st - $500 | |||
| **2nd - $200 | |||
| **3rd - $100 | |||
| *'''''Diversity winner''''' - $100 | |||
| *'''''Gender-gap fillers''''' - $100 | |||
| *'''''Language Winners''''' - up to $100* | |||
| Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page ]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--] (]) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)}} | |||
| LimeyCinema1960: "Is it crucial in the development of this article that a preliminary draft of an independent and probably on their own effort produced dialogue transcript of the released film have have a typo identified? Talk about inconsequential and maybe a pathological obsession with asserting some sense of perceived authority working on behalf of the group based on what that person accepts as either correct or incorrect. This comes from me because i am attempting to understand the dynamics and reiterate in my mind every time that some "decision" comes down from Almighty." | |||
| <small>''Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from ]''</small> | |||
| Stylometric comparison, anyone? --] (]) 13:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=22093159 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 19:41, 27 March 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Ring Cinema has not edited Misplaced Pages since 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| This is Ring Cinema's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
happy birthday transcript
Patty Hill's 1935 deposition Deposition De Bene Esse 7-8 in Hill v. Harris, No. E 78-350, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Examination of Miss Patty S. Hill by Mr. Malcolm B. Stark).
A. . . . while only the words “Good Morning to All” were put in the book we used it for “Good-bye to you”, “Happy Journey to You”, “Happy Christmas to You” and “Happy New Year to You”, Happy Vacation to You” and so forth and so on. Q. Did you also use the words “Happy Birthday to You”. A. We certainly did with every birthday celebration in the school. Q. Did you write the words for this particular tune of “Good Morning To All,” Miss Hill? A. I did. Q. Had you at that time also written many other verses in conjunction with the words which appear in the edition of “Song Stories for the Kindergarten”, published in 1893. A. Yes, we were writing them practically every day.150
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Sleuth/Deathtrap Dispute Resolution Noticeboard discussion
August 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ] ♠ 00:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Another idiot admin who doesn't know the policy of Misplaced Pages. Good job, Swarm, you stupidly blocked me for returning the page to the last consensus. That's what we're supposed to do in the case of a content dispute. Yes, I know, that is so hard to learn! Another moron example of how admins are the sickness of Misplaced Pages. --Ring Cinema (talk) 02:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Ring Cinema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Swarm very stupidly failed to follow policy. While that is a very common problem with admins, this is an obvious case. Good editors like me don't have time to waste with morons like Swarm. I expect an apology and a prompt reversal.
Decline reason:
Due to personal attacks, your block has been extended indefinitely. Max Semenik (talk) 04:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Due to your stupidity, you are banned from having an opinion. LOL. Let's be clear, pea brain: I create value on Misplaced Pages and I've done that for years. Moron admins like you are afraid of your shadows because you are told the truth. Okay, so you all are the disease of Misplaced Pages. You are ruining WP because of your incompetence. All right, now you know. Now lift my block and stop proving you're over your head with a thimble of power. I expect you to correct your stupid error by the end of the day. --Ring Cinema (talk) 12:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
--Ring Cinema (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Misplaced Pages!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Categories: