| Revision as of 20:29, 19 June 2006 editWilliam M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,008 edits →User notice: temporary 3RR block: reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:29, 16 May 2013 edit undoWerieth (talk | contribs)54,678 editsm clean up using AWB |
| (268 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
__NOTOC__ |
|
{{unblock}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* This file is used for the history dates only. |
|
==curses are not real== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<table width="100%" style="background-color: rgb(220, 220, 220); text-align: left; font-family: monospace;" border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="2"><tr style="vertical-align: top; text-align: center; background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204);"><td>'''Archive'''</td><td>'''From'''</td><td>'''To'''</td><td style="background-color:#DDDDDD" rowspan="6" width="100px">]</td> |
|
Just to be clear, Ste4k, there is not actually such a thing as a "curse", as you seem to believe in your persistent insertion of a weird story about a "cursed newsgroup". Please stop adding this silliness to an otherwise fine article. ] <small>(])</small> 23:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
Thank you for your comments Sdedeo, and I appreciate your further comments on the Talk:Curse about the rephrasing |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:01:09 +0000</td> |
|
of the section to avoid such an interpretation in the future: "''Congrats on rephrasing the paragraph so as not to claim the existence of a real live internet curse.'' -- Sdedeo (tips) 23:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)" ] 17:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:01:39 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:01:09 +0000</td> |
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
====Regarding reversions made on ] ] (]) to ]==== |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
{| class="user-block" |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000</td> |
|
|| ] |
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
|| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
|
|
|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 06:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)</div> |
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000</td> |
|
Thank you Mr. Connolly, for bringing this matter to my attention. I am sorry that you hadn't the time |
|
|
|
</tr><tr> |
|
to read the discussion in Talk:Curse or check to see that the revisions made had changed the content. |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;"></td> |
|
I have taken the time that you set aside for me to become more familiar with the 3RR. I have also |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:01.00 +0000</td> |
|
become more aware of the purposes of the Talk pages. Thanks again. ] 17:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<td style="vertical-align: top;">Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000</td> |
|
|
|
|
|
</tr></table> |
|
: But you have also leapt straight back into reverting, so you get another block: 24h this time ] 20:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: On the contrary, the revert was made to prevent vandalism, and proper procedure for preventing vandalism |
|
|
: was followed. ] 20:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
: By the way, I am new and unfamilar to the wiki environment. I am reading about how all of this works, but |
|
|
: am still unclear on whether your reference to "discussion" earlier meant e-mail, the talk-page of the subject, |
|
|
: your talk-page, or this-page here. I haven't any idea how you are properly notified to discuss this issue or |
|
|
: where exactly such discussions normally take place. Please allow some patience. ] |
|
|
|
|
|
:: I suggest, if you're new, you apply ] until you're settled in. And perhaps beyond. Discussion refers to the talk pages of the article. Its boilerplate text in my block message, though ] 20:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC) |
|
