Misplaced Pages

One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:31, 11 February 2014 edit200.120.73.176 (talk) Sylvia Browne: citations go after the facts, not before them← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:35, 11 November 2024 edit undo2a00:23c8:b9c:d101:4d43:a387:96c4:f112 (talk) History: Grammar amendedTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(254 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Offer to pay anyone who could demonstrate a paranormal ability}}
{{Overly detailed|date=August 2023}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2020}}
The '''One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge''' was an offer by the ] (JREF) to pay out one million U.S. dollars to anyone who could demonstrate a ] or ] ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria. A version of the challenge was first issued in 1964. Over a thousand people applied to take it, but none was successful. The challenge was terminated in 2015.<ref name=shut/><ref name=terminated/><ref name=retire/><ref name=rolling>{{Cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/james-randi-obituary-1079316/|title = James Randi, Famed Magician and Paranormal Skeptic, Dead at 92| magazine=] |date = October 22, 2020}}</ref><ref name=challenge>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/magazine/the-unbelievable-skepticism-of-the-amazing-randi.html?_r=0|title=The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi|newspaper=The New York Times|date=November 7, 2014|last1=Higginbotham|first1=Adam}}</ref>


== History ==
The '''One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge''' is offered by the ], which says it will pay out one million U.S. dollars to anyone who can demonstrate a supernatural or paranormal ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria. Over a thousand people have applied to take the challenge, but none has yet been successful.
]
] developed the idea for the challenge during a radio panel discussion when a parapsychologist challenged him to "put money where mouth is."<ref name="faq">{{cite web |title=JREF Challenge FAQ |url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge/challenge-faq.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121212064941/http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge/challenge-faq.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-12-12 |publisher=James Randi Educational Foundation |access-date=2012-12-18}}</ref> In 1964, Randi offered a $1,000 prize, soon increasing it to $10,000. Later, ] wanted Randi to do a show called the $100,000 Psychic Prize, so they added $90,000 to the original $10,000 raised by Randi. Finally, in 1996, one of his friends, Internet pioneer ], donated $1 million for the prize.<ref name = "SF-Weekly">{{cite web| title = The Demystifying Adventures of the Amazing Randi| url = http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-08-26/news/the-demystifying-adventures-of-the-amazing-randi/1| access-date = September 5, 2009| archive-date = October 11, 2012| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121011200041/http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-08-26/news/the-demystifying-adventures-of-the-amazing-randi/1/| url-status = dead}}''SF Weekly'', August 24, 2009, online version, p. 2: "One of his friends, Internet pioneer Rick Adams, put up $1 million in 1996."</ref> The prize is sometimes referred to in the media as the "Randi Prize".


By April 1, 2007, only those with an already existing media profile and the backing of a reputable academic were allowed to apply for the challenge. It was hoped that the resources freed up by not having to test obscure and possibly ] claimants would then be used to challenge high-profile alleged psychics and mediums such as ] and ] with a campaign in the media.<ref name = "Wired2007">{{cite news | url = https://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72482-0.html?tw=wn_index_1 | title = Skeptic Revamps $1M Psychic Prize | publisher = ] |date=2007-01-12 |first=Kevin |last=Poulsen }}</ref>
==History==
]
] developed the idea for the challenge when, during a radio panel discussion, a parapsychologist challenged him to "put money where mouth is."<ref name="faq">{{cite web|title=JREF Challenge FAQ|url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge/challenge-faq.html|publisher=James Randi Educational Foundation|accessdate=18 December 2012}}</ref> In 1964, Randi started offering $1,000, then $10,000 prizes. Later, ] wanted Randi to do a show called the $100,000 Psychic Prize, so they added $90,000 to the original $10,000 raised by Randi. Finally, in 1996, one of his friends, Internet pioneer ], donated US $1,000,000 for the prize.<ref name = "SF-Weekly">{{cite web| title = The Demystifying Adventures of the Amazing Randi| url = http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-08-26/news/the-demystifying-adventures-of-the-amazing-randi/1| accessdate = September 5, 2009}}''SF Weekly'', August 24, 2009, online version, page 2: "One of his friends, Internet pioneer Rick Adams, put up $1 million in 1996."</ref>


On January 4, 2008, it was announced that the prize would be discontinued on March 6, 2010, in order to free the money for other uses. In the meantime, claimants were welcome to vie for it. One of the reasons offered for its discontinuation is the unwillingness of higher-profile claimants to apply.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/144-swift-january-4-2008.html#i4 |title=SWIFT Newsletter January 4, 2008 |publisher=Randi.org |access-date=2014-06-12}}</ref> However, at ''The Amazing Meeting 7'', it was announced that the $1 Million Challenge prize would not expire in 2010. The Foundation issued a formal update on its website on July 30, 2009, announcing the Challenge's continuation, and stated more information would be provided at a later date on any possible changes to the requirements and procedures.<ref>{{cite web| title = Million Dollar Challenge Update: It's not ending!| url = http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/jref-news/640-million-dollar-challenge-update-its-not-ending.html| access-date = July 30, 2009}} Announcement by Director Phil Plait on July 29, 2009</ref>
By April 1, 2007, only those with an already existing media profile and the backing of a reputable academic were allowed to apply for the challenge. It was hoped that the resources freed up by not having to test obscure and possibly ] claimants would then be used to challenge high-profile alleged psychics and mediums such as ] and ] with a campaign in the media.<ref name = "Wired2007">{{cite news | url = http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72482-0.html?tw = wn_index_1 | title = Skeptic Revamps $1M Psychic Prize | publisher = ] | date = January 12, 2007 | first = Kevin | last = Poulsen | accessdate = 2007-01-14}}</ref>


As an ] prank on April 1, 2008, at the ], Randi pretended to award the prize to magician Seth Raphael after participating in a test of Raphael's "psychic abilities".<ref>{{cite web|last=Raphael|first=Seth|title=Seth Raphael claims Randi's Million Dollar Challenge|website=] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_0E1XJP33E |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211220/c_0E1XJP33E |archive-date=2021-12-20 |url-status=live|access-date=2013-04-11 |date=2008-04-01}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
On January 4, 2008, it was announced that the prize would be discontinued on March 6, 2010 in order to free the money for other uses. In the meantime, claimants were welcome to vie for it. One of the reasons offered for its discontinuation is the unwillingness of higher-profile claimants to apply.<ref></ref> However, at ''The Amaz!ng Meeting 7'', it was announced that the $1 Million Challenge prize would not expire in 2010. The Foundation issued a formal update on its website on July 30, 2009, announcing the Challenge's continuation, and stated more information would be provided at a later date on any possible changes to the requirements and procedures.<ref>{{cite web| title = Million Dollar Challenge Update: It's not ending!| url = http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/jref-news/640-million-dollar-challenge-update-its-not-ending.html| accessdate = July 30, 2009}} Announcement by Director Phil Plait on July 29, 2009</ref>


On March 8, 2011, the JREF announced that qualifications were being altered to open the challenge to more applicants. Whereas applicants were previously required to submit press clippings and a letter from an academic institution to qualify, the new rules now require applicants to present either press clippings, a letter from an academic institution, or a public video demonstrating their ability. The JREF explained that these new rules would give people without media or academic documentation a way to be considered for testing, and would allow the JREF to use online video and social media to reach a wider audience.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/jref-news/1239-mdc-changes.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110312070220/http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/jref-news/1239-mdc-changes.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2011-03-12 |author=Crabtree, Sadie |title=JREF's $1,000,000 Paranormal Challenge Now Easier Than Ever |publisher=James Randi Educational Foundation |date=2011-03-09}}</ref>
As an ] prank on April 1, 2008, at the ], Randi awarded the prize to magician Seth Raphael after participating in a test of Raphael's "psychic abilities".<ref>{{cite web|last=Raphael|first=Seth|title=Seth Raphael claims Randi's Million Dollar Challenge|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_0E1XJP33E|accessdate=11 April 2013|date=1 April 2008}}</ref>


Since the challenge was first created by Randi in 1964, about a thousand people applied, but none were successful.<ref name="faq"/> Randi has said that few unsuccessful applicants ever seriously considered that their failure to perform might be due to the nonexistence of the power they believe they possess.<ref> on ], 2007-02-08</ref><ref name=rolling/>
On March 8, 2011, the JREF announced that qualifications were being altered to open the Challenge to more applicants. Whereas applicants were previously required to submit press clippings and a letter from an academic institution to qualify, the new rules now require applicants to present either press clippings, a letter from an academic institution, or a public video demonstrating their ability. The JREF explained that these new rules would give people without media or academic documentation a way to be considered for testing, and would allow the JREF to use online video and social media to reach a wider audience.<ref>Crabtree, Sadie. , James Randi Education Foundation, March 9, 2011</ref>


In January 2015, James Randi announced that he was officially retiring and stepping down from his position with the JREF.<ref name=retire>{{cite web |url=http://web.randi.org/home/archives/01-2015 |title=An AMAZ!NG adventure… to be continued |author=James Randi |publisher=James Randi Educational Foundation |date=2015-01-28 |access-date=2015-12-10}}</ref> In September 2015, JREF announced that their board had decided that it would convert the foundation into a grant-making foundation, and they will no longer accept applications directly from people claiming to have a paranormal power.<ref name=shut>{{cite web |url=http://web.randi.org/home/jref-status |title=JREF Status |author=The Board of Directors of JREF, Chip Denman and Rick Adams |publisher=James Randi Educational Foundation |date=2015-09-01 |access-date=2015-12-10}}</ref> In 2015 the James Randi paranormal challenge was officially terminated.<ref name="terminated">{{Cite web|url=https://web.randi.org/the-million-dollar-challenge.html|title=The Million Dollar Challenge|website=JREF|language=en|access-date=2020-04-11}}</ref>
Since the challenge was first created by Randi in 1964, about a thousand people have applied, but no one has been successful.<ref name="faq"/> Randi has said that few unsuccessful applicants ever seriously consider that their failure to perform might be due to the nonexistence of the power they believe they possess.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pennfans.net/view/Audio_Archive/PennRadio/Penn.Jillette.Radio.Show.2007.02.08/ |title=James Randi interview on Penn Radio, 2007-02-08 |publisher=Pennfans.net |date=2007-02-08 |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


==Rules and judging== == Rules and judging ==
{{more citations needed|date=February 2019}}
] (back to camera) has his balance performance tested during the preliminary test phase of the challenge.]]
] (back to camera) has his balance performance tested during the preliminary test phase of the challenge.]]
The official Challenge rules stipulate that the participant must agree, in writing, to the conditions and criteria of their test. Claims that cannot be tested experimentally are not eligible for the Challenge. Claimants are able to influence all aspects of the testing procedure and participants during the initial negotiation phase of the challenge. Applications for any challenges that might cause serious injury or death will not be accepted.
The official challenge rules stipulated that the participant must agree, in writing, to the conditions and criteria of their test. Claims that cannot be tested experimentally are not eligible for the Challenge. Claimants were able to influence all aspects of the testing procedure and participants during the initial negotiation phase of the challenge. Applications for any challenges that might cause serious injury or death were not accepted.<ref name="faq"/>


To ensure that the experimental conditions themselves do not negatively affect a claimant's ability to perform, non-blinded preliminary control tests are often performed. For example, the JREF has ] perform a control test, in which the dowser attempts to locate the target substance or object using their dowsing ability, even though the target's location has been revealed to the applicant. Failure to display a 100% success rate in the open test will cause their immediate disqualification. However, claimants are usually able to perform successfully during the open test, confirming that experimental conditions are adequate. To ensure that the experimental conditions themselves did not negatively affect a claimant's ability to perform, non-blinded preliminary control tests are often performed. For example, the JREF had ] perform a control test, in which the dowser attempts to locate the target substance or object using their dowsing ability, even though the target's location has been revealed to the applicant. Failure to display a 100% success rate in the open test would cause their immediate disqualification. However, claimants were usually able to perform successfully during the open test, confirming that experimental conditions are adequate.{{citation needed|date=February 2019}}


The rules prohibit independent judging, making the success or failure of the challenge dependent on whether Randi agrees that the test has been passed. JREF staff and affiliates point out that the nature of the experimental design makes subjective judging of results unnecessary. Since claimants agree to readily observable success criteria prior to the test, results are unambiguous and clearly indicate whether or not the criteria have been met. Randi has said that he need not participate in any way with the actual execution of the test, and he has been willing to travel far from the test location to avoid the perception that his anti-paranormal bias could influence the test results.<ref>{{cite web|title=Challenge Info|url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html|publisher=JREF|accessdate=10 April 2013}}</ref> Claimants agreed to readily observable success criteria prior to the test, results were unambiguous and clearly indicated whether or not the criteria have been met. Randi had said that he need not participate in any way with the actual execution of the test, and he has been willing to travel far from the test location to avoid the perception that his anti-paranormal bias could influence the test results.<ref>{{cite web|title=Challenge Info|url=http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130402125827/http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=2013-04-02|publisher=JREF|access-date=2013-04-10}}</ref>


The discussions between the JREF and applicants were at one time posted on a public discussion board for all to see. Since the resignation of Randi's assistant, Mr. Kramer—and subsequent changes to challenge rules requiring applicants to have demonstrated considerable notability—new applications are no longer logged, but the JREF continues to maintain an archive of previous applicants.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=8 |title=JREF logs of challenge applicants |publisher=Forums.randi.org |date= |accessdate=2013-04-10}}</ref> The discussions between the JREF and applicants were at one time posted on a public discussion board.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=43 |title=Challenge Applications |publisher=International Skeptics Forum |access-date=10 June 2016}}</ref> After the resignation of Randi's assistant ] and subsequent changes to challenge rules—requiring applicants to have demonstrated considerable notability—new applications were no longer logged.


]
==Example of a test (dowsing)==

In 1979 Randi tested four people in Italy for ] ability (Mr. Fontana, Dr. Borga, Mr. Stanziola, and Mr. Senatore). The prize at the time was $10,000. The conditions were that a 10 meter by 10 meter test area would be used. There would be water supply and a reservoir just outside the test area. There would be three plastic pipes running underground from the source to the reservoir along different concealed paths. Each pipe would pass through the test area by entering at some point on an edge and exiting at some point on an edge. A pipe would not cross itself but it might cross others. The pipes were 3 centimeters in diameter and were buried 50 centimeters below ground. Valves would select which of the pipes water was running through, and only one would be selected at a time. At least 5 liters per second of water would flow through the selected pipe. The dowser must first check the area to see if there is any natural water or anything else that would interfere with the test, and that would be marked. Additionally, the dowser must demonstrate that the dowsing reaction works on an exposed pipe with the water running. Then one of the three pipes would be selected randomly for each trial. The dowser would place ten to one hundred pegs in the ground along the path he or she traces as the path of the active pipe. Two-thirds of the pegs placed by the dowser must be within 10 centimeters of the center of the pipe being traced for the trial to be a success. Three trials would be done for the test of each dowser and the dowser must pass two of the three trials to pass the test. A lawyer was present, in possession of Randi's $10,000 check. If a claimant were successful, the lawyer would give him or her the check. If none were successful, the check would be returned to Randi.
== Example of a test (dowsing) ==

In 1979, Randi tested four people in Italy for ] ability. The prize at the time was $10,000. The conditions were that a {{convert|10|by|10|meter|adj=on|sp=us}} test area would be used. There would be a water supply and a reservoir just outside the test area. There would be three plastic pipes running underground from the source to the reservoir along different concealed paths. Each pipe would pass through the test area by entering at some point on an edge and exiting at some point on an edge. A pipe would not cross itself but it might cross others. The pipes were {{convert|3|cm|abbr=off|sp=us}} in diameter and were buried {{convert|50|cm|abbr=on}} below ground. Valves would select which of the pipes water was running through, and only one would be selected at a time. At least {{convert|5|L/s|abbr=off|sp=us}} of water would flow through the selected pipe. The dowser must first check the area to see if there is any natural water or anything else that would interfere with the test, and that would be marked. Additionally, the dowser must demonstrate that the dowsing reaction works on an exposed pipe with the water running. Then one of the three pipes would be selected randomly for each trial. The dowser would place ten to one hundred pegs in the ground along the path he or she traces as the path of the active pipe. Two-thirds of the pegs placed by the dowser must be within {{convert|10|cm|abbr=on}} of the center of the pipe being traced for the trial to be a success. Three trials would be done for the test of each dowser and the dowser must pass two of the three trials to pass the test. A lawyer was present, in possession of Randi's $10,000 check. If a claimant were successful, the lawyer would give him the check. If none were successful, the check would be returned to Randi.


All of the dowsers agreed with the conditions of the test and stated that they felt able to perform the test that day and that the water flow was sufficient. Before the test they were asked how sure they were that they would succeed. All said either "99 percent" or "100 percent" certain. They were asked what they would conclude if the water flow was 90 degrees from what they thought it was and all said that it was impossible. After the test they were asked how confident they were that they had passed the test. Three answered "100 percent" and one answered that he had not completed the test. All of the dowsers agreed with the conditions of the test and stated that they felt able to perform the test that day and that the water flow was sufficient. Before the test they were asked how sure they were that they would succeed. All said either "99 percent" or "100 percent" certain. They were asked what they would conclude if the water flow was 90 degrees from what they thought it was and all said that it was impossible. After the test they were asked how confident they were that they had passed the test. Three answered "100 percent" and one answered that he had not completed the test.


When all of the tests were over and the location of the pipes was revealed, none of the dowsers had passed the test. Dr. Borga had placed his markers carefully, but the nearest was a full 8 feet from the water pipe. Borga said, "We are lost", but within two minutes he started blaming his failure on many things such as ]s and ] variables. Two of the dowsers thought they had found natural water before the test started, but disagreed with each other about where it was, as well as with the ones who found no natural water.<ref>{{cite book|last=Randi|first=James|title=Flim-Flam!|year=1982|publisher=Prometheus Books|isbn=978-0879751982|pages=307–324}}</ref> When all of the tests were over and the location of the pipes was revealed, none of the dowsers had passed the test. Dr. Borga had placed his markers carefully, but the nearest was a full {{convert|8|ft|sp=us|order=flip}} from the water pipe. Borga said, "We are lost", but within two minutes he started blaming his failure on many things such as ]s and ] variables. Two of the dowsers thought they had found natural water before the test started, but disagreed with each other about where it was, as well as with the ones who found no natural water.<ref>{{cite book|last=Randi|first=James|author-link=James Randi|title=Flim-Flam!|year=1982|publisher=Prometheus Books|isbn=978-0879751982|pages=307–324}}</ref>


== Criticism ==
==Controversies and claimants==


Astronomer ] described the challenge as insincere, saying that Randi would ensure he never had to pay out. In the October 1981 issue of ], Rawlins quoted him as saying "I always have an out".<ref name = "fate-starbaby">{{cite journal | last = Rawlins | first = Dennis | author-link = Dennis Rawlins |date=October 1981 | title = sTARBABY | journal = Fate | issue = 34 }} Reprinted in {{cite web | url = http://cura.free.fr/xv/14starbb.html | title = sTARBABY | publisher = Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Astrologie (The International Astrology Research Center) | access-date=2006-09-09}}</ref> Randi stated that Rawlins did not give the entire quotation, and actually said "Concerning the challenge, I always have an 'out': I'm right!"<ref>Swift newsletter, vol. 2 no. 2, 1998 (p. 3)</ref>
===Dennis Rawlins===
Astronomer ] claimed the challenge is insincere, and that Randi will ensure he never has to pay out. In the October 1981 issue of ], Rawlins quoted him as saying "I always have an out".<ref name = "fate-starbaby">{{cite journal | last = Rawlins | first = Dennis | authorlink = Dennis Rawlins |date=October 1981 | title = sTARBABY | journal = FATE Magazine | issue = 34 | ref = harv }} Reprinted in {{cite web | url = http://cura.free.fr/xv/14starbb.html | title = sTARBABY | publisher = Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Astrologie (The International Astrology Research Center) | accessdate = 2006-09-09}}</ref> Randi has stated that Rawlins did not give the entire quotation, and actually said "''Concerning the challenge, I always have an 'out': I'm right!''".<ref>Swift newsletter, vol. 2 no. 2, 1998 (page 3)</ref> Randi states that the phrase "I always have an out" refers to the fact that he does not allow test subjects to cheat. Randi stated that if such phenomena did exist and someone accurately demonstrated it, he would give them one million dollars.


Self-proclaimed psychic ] suggested the one million dollars prize fund did not exist, or was in the form of pledges or promissory notes.<ref> ''Larry King Live'', CNN, 2007-01-26</ref> The JREF stated that the million dollars was in the form of negotiable bonds within a "James Randi Educational Foundation Prize Account" and that validation of the account and the prize amount could be supplied on demand. The money was held in an ] Wealth Management account.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/site/images/stories/evercore.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140330232310/http://www.randi.org/site/images/stories/evercore.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=2014-03-30 |title=Million Dollar Challenge financial statement |access-date=2014-06-12}}</ref>
===Sylvia Browne===
On ''Larry King Live'', March 6, 2001, ] asked psychic ] if she would take the challenge and she agreed.<ref> ].com transcripts, March 6, 2001</ref> Randi appeared with Browne again on ''Larry King Live'' on September 3, 2001 and she again accepted the challenge.<ref name = "CNN09032001">{{cite news | url = http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/03/lkl.00.html | title = Are Psychics Real? | publisher = CNN/] |date=September 3, 2001 | first = Larry | last = King | accessdate = 2006-08-18}}</ref> However, she has refused to be tested and Randi kept a clock on his website recording the number of weeks that have passed since Sylvia accepted the challenge without following through. Eventually the clock was replaced with text stating that "over 5 years" had passed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/sylvia/ |title=The Sylvia Browne Clock |publisher=Randi.org |date= |accessdate=2010-05-13}}</ref>


== Challenges ==
===Rosemary Altea===
In an appearance on ''Larry King Live'' on January 26, 2007, Randi challenged psychic ] to take the one million challenge. On Altea and Randi's June 5, 2001 meeting on the same show, Altea refused to take the challenge, calling it "a trick". Instead Altea, in part, replied "I agree with what he says, that there are many, many people who claim to be spiritual mediums, they claim to talk to the dead. There are many, people, we all know this. There are cheats and charlatans everywhere." Randi's response was to say "you're one of them".<ref name="transcripts.cnn.com"> (] versus Randi) on ] June 5, 2001</ref>


=== Refusals to be tested ===
Rosemary Altea also made the claim the one million dollars does not exist, or is in the form of pledges or promissory notes.<ref> ''Larry King Live'', CNN, January 26, 2007</ref> The JREF has stated that the million dollars is in the form of negotiable bonds within a "James Randi Educational Foundation Prize Account" and that validation of the account and the prize amount can be supplied on demand. The money is held in an ] Wealth Management account.<ref></ref>


On ''Larry King Live'', March 6, 2001, ] asked psychic ] if she would take the challenge and she agreed.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200112141825/http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0103/06/lkl.00.html |date=January 12, 2020 }} ].com transcripts, March 6, 2001</ref> Randi appeared with Browne again on ''Larry King Live'' on September 3, 2001, and she again accepted the challenge.<ref name = "CNN09032001">{{cite news | url = http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/03/lkl.00.html | title = Are Psychics Real? | publisher = CNN/] |date=September 3, 2001 | first = Larry | last = King |author-link=Larry King| access-date = 2006-08-18}}</ref> However, she refused to be tested and Randi kept a clock on his website recording the number of weeks that had passed since Browne accepted the challenge without following through. Eventually the clock was replaced with text stating that "over 5 years" had passed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/sylvia/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100430151706/http://www.randi.org/sylvia/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=2010-04-30 |title=The Sylvia Browne Clock |publisher=Randi.org |access-date=2010-05-13}}</ref> Browne died in 2013.
===Rico Kolodzey===
Randi rejected applicant Rico Kolodzey, stating in the rejection letter that the applicant was "a liar and a fraud." The applicant in question claimed to survive without food via ]. Randi asserted that Kolodzey's claim was so absurd or untestable on its face that it merited outright rejection. For example, Randi and the JREF explained their outright rejection of Kolodzey based on a policy to reject any applicants who put themselves in grave physical danger, although this clause was not added to the official Challenge rules until years after the incident. However, on May 19, 2006, Randi made a special exception to that rule due to all of the "raucous fuss" and began private negotiations for testing with Kolodzey. After 100 days of negotiations a test procedure still could not be agreed upon by both parties. In response to the stalled negotiations, Randi publicly commented that Kolodzey was retreating from testing after strenuously objecting to the rejection of his initial application.{{Citation needed|date=April 2013}}


In an appearance on ''Larry King Live'' on January 26, 2007, Randi challenged psychic Rosemary Altea to take the one-million-dollar challenge. During Altea and Randi's June 5, 2001 meeting on the same show, Altea refused to take the challenge, calling it "a trick". Instead Altea, in part, replied "I agree with what he says, that there are many, many people who claim to be spiritual mediums, they claim to talk to the dead. There are many, people, we all know this. There are cheats and charlatans everywhere." Randi's response was to suggest that Altea was also one of the "cheats and charlatans".<ref name="transcripts.cnn.com"> (] versus ]) on ] June 5, 2001</ref>
===Yellow Bamboo===
Members of a group from Bali, referring to themselves as Yellow Bamboo, claimed one of their number, Pak Nyoman Serengen, could knock down an attacker at a distance, using only a piece of yellow ]. Video clips on their website showed a crowd of students running at Serengen, and falling to the ground when (or, in some cases, slightly before) Serengen extended his hand and shouted. The JREF arranged volunteers to carry out a preliminary investigation, but after the Yellow Bamboo group "threw every sort of obstacle in the way of that plan", Randi announced that he was terminating further involvement with them.<ref name="bamboo">{{cite web|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20100423010508/http://www.randi.org/jr/100303.html|archivedate=2010-04-23|url=http://www.randi.org/jr/100303.html |title=Rejection of Yellow Bamboo's claim |publisher=Randi.org |date=2003-10-03 |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


In an appearance on ITV's '']'', on September 27, 2011, magician ] challenged Welsh psychic Leigh Catherine (aka Leigh-Catherine Salway) to take the one million dollar challenge and she accepted. ], a ''This Morning'' host, stated that the program would pay for her flights to the US to be tested.<ref>{{cite web|title=Good Morning TV Clip| website=] |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_hit23Tyak |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211220/-_hit23Tyak |archive-date=2021-12-20 |url-status=live}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Salway subsequently backed out of the challenge, claiming it was "dodgy" and "set up to make it impossible to pass".<ref>{{cite tweet|user=PsychicLC|author=Leigh-Catherine|number=119475434030243840|date=29 September 2011|title=Had a very interesting email re the Randi challenge today. As expected – dodgy as legally & set up to make it impossible to pass !}}</ref>
A local volunteer contacted Randi offering to investigate the group unofficially. A low resolution video showed the investigator being knocked to the ground during a preliminary test. The JREF pointed out that the test was not conducted according to the proposed protocol, with multiple flaws in the execution including being carried out at night.<ref name="bamboo"/> Upon viewing a set of still shots from the incident, several people experienced with ] suggested that an electroshock weapon could have been used.<ref>{{cite web|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20100616173018/http://www.randi.org/jr/101703.html|archivedate=2010-06-16|url=http://www.randi.org/jr/101703.html |title=Yellow Bamboo may have used a stun gun to achieve his results |publisher=Randi.org |date=2003-10-17 |accessdate=2009-06-15}}</ref>


===Leigh Catherine=== === Rejected applicants ===
In an appearance on ITV's "This Morning", on September 27, 2011, magician ] challenged Welsh psychic Leigh Catherine to take the one million dollar challenge and she accepted. ], a "This Morning" host, stated that the program would pay for her flights to the USA to be tested.<ref>{{cite web|title=Good Morning TV Clip|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_hit23Tyak}}</ref> Salway subsequently backed out of the challenge, explaining in a Tweet "As expected - dodgy as legally & set up to make it impossible to pass!".<ref>{{cite web|last=Catherine|first=Leigh|title=Twitter Account|url=https://twitter.com/PsychicLC/status/119475434030243840}}</ref>


Randi rejected an application from Rico Kolodzey, a ] who claimed to have survived without food since 1998. In 2006, Randi agreed to test Kolodzey's claims, but the two parties were unable to agree on the venue and method of the test.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://svenska.yle.fi/artikel/2015/04/16/en-hederlig-lognare|title=En hederlig lögnare|author=Marcus Rosenlund|work=yle.fi}}</ref>
==See also==

* ]
Members of a group from Bali, referring to themselves as Yellow Bamboo, claimed one of their number, Pak Nyoman Serengen, could knock down an attacker at a distance, using only a piece of yellow ]. Video clips on their website showed a crowd of students running at Serengen, and falling to the ground when (or, in some cases, slightly before) Serengen extended his hand and shouted. The JREF arranged volunteers to carry out a preliminary investigation, but after the Yellow Bamboo group "threw every sort of obstacle in the way of that plan", Randi announced that he was terminating further involvement with them. A local volunteer contacted Randi offering to investigate the group unofficially. A low-resolution video showed the investigator being knocked to the ground during a preliminary test. The JREF pointed out that the test was not conducted according to the proposed protocol, with multiple flaws in the execution including being carried out at night.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/jr/100303.html |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090710052036/http://www.randi.org/jr/100303.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2009-07-10 |title=Rejection of Yellow Bamboo's claim |publisher=Randi.org |date=2003-10-03 |access-date=2009-06-15}}</ref> Upon viewing a set of still shots from the incident, several people experienced with stun-guns suggested that an ] could have been used.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.randi.org/jr/101703.html |archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20090709232203/http://www.randi.org/jr/101703.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2009-07-09 |title=Yellow Bamboo may have used a stun gun to achieve his results |publisher=Randi.org |date=2003-10-17 |access-date=2009-06-15}}</ref>
* '']'' (by Randi)

===Tests at The Amazing Meeting===
In July 2009, Danish psychic/dowser Connie Sonne was given the chance to prove her dowsing ability. She was asked to dowse some randomly selected cards hidden in envelopes and lost the challenge by selecting other incorrect ones. In an interview with ] afterward, she insisted that she lost merely because, "…it wasn't time yet for my powers to be revealed."<ref name=markedward/>

In July 2014, Chinese salesman Fei Wang was tested in front of an audience of 600 at the conclusion of ] in Las Vegas. Wang said that from his right hand, he could transmit a mysterious force a distance of {{convert|3|ft|cm|abbr=off|sp=us|order=flip}}, unhindered by wood, metal, plastic or cardboard. The energy, he said, could be felt by others as heat, pressure, magnetism, or simply "an indescribable change." A total of nine people were selected by Wang as subjects who would be able to determine whether they were receiving the force from his hand. On stage, Wang and a control person were behind a curtain, and the subjects were in front of the curtain with eyes and ears covered so as not to be able to deduce who was behind the curtain. A colored ball was chosen randomly to determine whether Wang or the control person would go first, and in that order they tried to transmit the energy onto the subject's hand (hidden from their view inside a cardboard box). The subject then stated whether she had felt any energy and whether it came from the first or second person. Wang needed to be the person selected by at least 8 of the 9 subjects in order to win the million dollars. After both of the first two subjects failed to choose Wang, the challenge was over. Wang stated that he would try again the next year, saying, "This energy is mysterious".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Higginbotham|first1=Adam|title=The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/magazine/the-unbelievable-skepticism-of-the-amazing-randi.html?_r=0|work=]|date=November 7, 2014|access-date=2014-11-10}}</ref>

Tech journalist Lee Hutchinson approached the JREF after writing an article for ''Ars Technica'' about directional ] cables that claim to "keep your audio signal completely free of electromagnetic interference". At the 2015 Amazing Meeting, the MDC set up a controlled double-blind demonstration with volunteers listening to two identical recordings with a randomly selected Ethernet cable, a normal one or the cable claiming to improve the listening experience. After seven volunteers (1 hit, 1 miss and 5 hearing no difference), the demonstration was ended as they were unable to select the "enhanced" cable over the common cable enough times to satisfy the testing protocols.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Hutchinson|first1=Lee|title=From the Minds of ARS to the audiophile, this $10,000 Ethernet cable apparently makes sense in reality, one-way silver cable does nothing but make "audiophools" poorer|url=https://arstechnica.com/staff/2015/02/to-the-audiophile-this-10000-ethernet-cable-apparently-makes-sense/|website=Ars Technica|date=February 10, 2015|access-date=July 25, 2015}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title = The audiophile's dilemma: strangers can't identify $340 cables, either|url = https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/even-vegas-strangers-agree-340-audiophile-cables-make-no-difference/|access-date = 2015-07-31|date = 2015-07-30}}</ref>

{|width="100%" border="1" class="wikitable"
|-valign="top"
!'''Year'''
!'''Challenger'''
!'''Purported Ability'''
!'''Test'''
!'''Results'''
!'''Notes'''
|-valign="top"
|2007
|Derek Ogilvie
|Mediumship
|Identify which one out of ten toys is being used by a child at a particular time.
|Failed
|
|-valign="top"
|2009
|Connie Sonne
|Dowsing (Pendulum)
|Identify playing cards in sealed envelope.
|Failed<ref name=markedward>{{cite web|first=Mark|last=Edward|author-link=Mark Edward|title=Connie's Conundrums|url=http://www.skepticblog.org/2009/07/13/connies-conundrums/|publisher=Skeptic Blog|access-date=September 1, 2013}}</ref>
|
|-valign="top"
|2010
|Anita Ikonen
|Medical dowsing
|Determine by observation which of five subjects was missing a kidney.
|Failed
|Billed as "demonstration" not "test"
|-valign="top"
|2011
|colspan="5"|No challenger available
|-
|-
|-
|-valign="top"
|2012
|Andrew Needles
|Performance-enhancing bracelet
|Distinguish participants wearing real product significant number of times.
|Failed
|
|-valign="top"
|2013
|Brahim Addoun
|Remote viewing
|Remotely identify 3 of 20 objects.
|Failed
|
|-valign="top
|2014
|Fei Wang
|Sending energy through his hand that can be felt by another person.
|The energy should be felt by the target person correctly eight out of nine times.
|Failed
|
|-valign="top
|2015
|No claimant – "Demonstration test"
|] cables that are claimed to be "directional".
|Volunteers were played sound twice and were asked to determine which cable had the highest sound quality.
|Failed
|
|}
<gallery>
File:Million Dollar Challenge - Connie Sonne.jpg|Connie Sonne and ] at TAM 2009
File:Challenge 234.jpg|], ] and others are "viewed" by paranormal applicant for a missing kidney – 2010.
File:MillionDollarChallenge2012.jpg|Performance-enhancing bracelet at TAM 2012
File:TAM11-3163.jpg|The 3 remote viewing objects from TAM 2013
File:TAM11-3125.jpg|] in remote viewing room at TAM 2013
File:MDC 2014.jpg|Fei Wang is applicant, ] and ] are assisting TAM 2014
File:MDC TAM13.jpg |Demonstration test of ] cables TAM13 – Grace Denman and volunteers – 2015
</gallery>

== See also ==
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* '']'' (by Randi)


==References== == References ==
{{Reflist|2}} {{Reflist|30em}}


== External links ==
==Official website==
* &nbsp;— Official website * {{Official website|http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html }}
** {{cite web |url= http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html |title= One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge |website= JREF |url-status= dead |archive-date= January 21, 2014 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140121112147/http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html }}
* {{cite web |url= https://web.randi.org/home/jref-status |title= JREF Status |website= JREF |date= Sep 1, 2015}}


{{Skeptic Organizations}} {{Skeptic Organizations}}
{{pseudoscience}} {{pseudoscience}}
{{James Randi}}


]
]
] ]

Latest revision as of 15:35, 11 November 2024

Offer to pay anyone who could demonstrate a paranormal ability
This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience. Please help by spinning off or relocating any relevant information, and removing excessive detail that may be against Misplaced Pages's inclusion policy. (August 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge was an offer by the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) to pay out one million U.S. dollars to anyone who could demonstrate a supernatural or paranormal ability under agreed-upon scientific testing criteria. A version of the challenge was first issued in 1964. Over a thousand people applied to take it, but none was successful. The challenge was terminated in 2015.

History

James Randi, founder of the James Randi Educational Foundation

James Randi developed the idea for the challenge during a radio panel discussion when a parapsychologist challenged him to "put money where mouth is." In 1964, Randi offered a $1,000 prize, soon increasing it to $10,000. Later, Lexington Broadcasting wanted Randi to do a show called the $100,000 Psychic Prize, so they added $90,000 to the original $10,000 raised by Randi. Finally, in 1996, one of his friends, Internet pioneer Rick Adams, donated $1 million for the prize. The prize is sometimes referred to in the media as the "Randi Prize".

By April 1, 2007, only those with an already existing media profile and the backing of a reputable academic were allowed to apply for the challenge. It was hoped that the resources freed up by not having to test obscure and possibly mentally ill claimants would then be used to challenge high-profile alleged psychics and mediums such as Sylvia Browne and John Edward with a campaign in the media.

On January 4, 2008, it was announced that the prize would be discontinued on March 6, 2010, in order to free the money for other uses. In the meantime, claimants were welcome to vie for it. One of the reasons offered for its discontinuation is the unwillingness of higher-profile claimants to apply. However, at The Amazing Meeting 7, it was announced that the $1 Million Challenge prize would not expire in 2010. The Foundation issued a formal update on its website on July 30, 2009, announcing the Challenge's continuation, and stated more information would be provided at a later date on any possible changes to the requirements and procedures.

As an April Fool's prank on April 1, 2008, at the MIT Media Lab, Randi pretended to award the prize to magician Seth Raphael after participating in a test of Raphael's "psychic abilities".

On March 8, 2011, the JREF announced that qualifications were being altered to open the challenge to more applicants. Whereas applicants were previously required to submit press clippings and a letter from an academic institution to qualify, the new rules now require applicants to present either press clippings, a letter from an academic institution, or a public video demonstrating their ability. The JREF explained that these new rules would give people without media or academic documentation a way to be considered for testing, and would allow the JREF to use online video and social media to reach a wider audience.

Since the challenge was first created by Randi in 1964, about a thousand people applied, but none were successful. Randi has said that few unsuccessful applicants ever seriously considered that their failure to perform might be due to the nonexistence of the power they believe they possess.

In January 2015, James Randi announced that he was officially retiring and stepping down from his position with the JREF. In September 2015, JREF announced that their board had decided that it would convert the foundation into a grant-making foundation, and they will no longer accept applications directly from people claiming to have a paranormal power. In 2015 the James Randi paranormal challenge was officially terminated.

Rules and judging

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
A TAM 2012 applicant claimed that a wristband product could improve a person's balance. Here, James Underdown (back to camera) has his balance performance tested during the preliminary test phase of the challenge.

The official challenge rules stipulated that the participant must agree, in writing, to the conditions and criteria of their test. Claims that cannot be tested experimentally are not eligible for the Challenge. Claimants were able to influence all aspects of the testing procedure and participants during the initial negotiation phase of the challenge. Applications for any challenges that might cause serious injury or death were not accepted.

To ensure that the experimental conditions themselves did not negatively affect a claimant's ability to perform, non-blinded preliminary control tests are often performed. For example, the JREF had dowsers perform a control test, in which the dowser attempts to locate the target substance or object using their dowsing ability, even though the target's location has been revealed to the applicant. Failure to display a 100% success rate in the open test would cause their immediate disqualification. However, claimants were usually able to perform successfully during the open test, confirming that experimental conditions are adequate.

Claimants agreed to readily observable success criteria prior to the test, results were unambiguous and clearly indicated whether or not the criteria have been met. Randi had said that he need not participate in any way with the actual execution of the test, and he has been willing to travel far from the test location to avoid the perception that his anti-paranormal bias could influence the test results.

The discussions between the JREF and applicants were at one time posted on a public discussion board. After the resignation of Randi's assistant Mark Kramer and subsequent changes to challenge rules—requiring applicants to have demonstrated considerable notability—new applications were no longer logged.

James Randi discusses the Million Dollar Challenge 2008

Example of a test (dowsing)

In 1979, Randi tested four people in Italy for dowsing ability. The prize at the time was $10,000. The conditions were that a 10-by-10-meter (33 by 33 ft) test area would be used. There would be a water supply and a reservoir just outside the test area. There would be three plastic pipes running underground from the source to the reservoir along different concealed paths. Each pipe would pass through the test area by entering at some point on an edge and exiting at some point on an edge. A pipe would not cross itself but it might cross others. The pipes were 3 centimeters (1.2 inches) in diameter and were buried 50 cm (20 in) below ground. Valves would select which of the pipes water was running through, and only one would be selected at a time. At least 5 liters per second (0.18 cubic feet per second) of water would flow through the selected pipe. The dowser must first check the area to see if there is any natural water or anything else that would interfere with the test, and that would be marked. Additionally, the dowser must demonstrate that the dowsing reaction works on an exposed pipe with the water running. Then one of the three pipes would be selected randomly for each trial. The dowser would place ten to one hundred pegs in the ground along the path he or she traces as the path of the active pipe. Two-thirds of the pegs placed by the dowser must be within 10 cm (3.9 in) of the center of the pipe being traced for the trial to be a success. Three trials would be done for the test of each dowser and the dowser must pass two of the three trials to pass the test. A lawyer was present, in possession of Randi's $10,000 check. If a claimant were successful, the lawyer would give him the check. If none were successful, the check would be returned to Randi.

All of the dowsers agreed with the conditions of the test and stated that they felt able to perform the test that day and that the water flow was sufficient. Before the test they were asked how sure they were that they would succeed. All said either "99 percent" or "100 percent" certain. They were asked what they would conclude if the water flow was 90 degrees from what they thought it was and all said that it was impossible. After the test they were asked how confident they were that they had passed the test. Three answered "100 percent" and one answered that he had not completed the test.

When all of the tests were over and the location of the pipes was revealed, none of the dowsers had passed the test. Dr. Borga had placed his markers carefully, but the nearest was a full 2.4 meters (8 ft) from the water pipe. Borga said, "We are lost", but within two minutes he started blaming his failure on many things such as sunspots and geomagnetic variables. Two of the dowsers thought they had found natural water before the test started, but disagreed with each other about where it was, as well as with the ones who found no natural water.

Criticism

Astronomer Dennis Rawlins described the challenge as insincere, saying that Randi would ensure he never had to pay out. In the October 1981 issue of Fate, Rawlins quoted him as saying "I always have an out". Randi stated that Rawlins did not give the entire quotation, and actually said "Concerning the challenge, I always have an 'out': I'm right!"

Self-proclaimed psychic Rosemary Altea suggested the one million dollars prize fund did not exist, or was in the form of pledges or promissory notes. The JREF stated that the million dollars was in the form of negotiable bonds within a "James Randi Educational Foundation Prize Account" and that validation of the account and the prize amount could be supplied on demand. The money was held in an Evercore Wealth Management account.

Challenges

Refusals to be tested

On Larry King Live, March 6, 2001, Larry King asked psychic Sylvia Browne if she would take the challenge and she agreed. Randi appeared with Browne again on Larry King Live on September 3, 2001, and she again accepted the challenge. However, she refused to be tested and Randi kept a clock on his website recording the number of weeks that had passed since Browne accepted the challenge without following through. Eventually the clock was replaced with text stating that "over 5 years" had passed. Browne died in 2013.

In an appearance on Larry King Live on January 26, 2007, Randi challenged psychic Rosemary Altea to take the one-million-dollar challenge. During Altea and Randi's June 5, 2001 meeting on the same show, Altea refused to take the challenge, calling it "a trick". Instead Altea, in part, replied "I agree with what he says, that there are many, many people who claim to be spiritual mediums, they claim to talk to the dead. There are many, people, we all know this. There are cheats and charlatans everywhere." Randi's response was to suggest that Altea was also one of the "cheats and charlatans".

In an appearance on ITV's This Morning, on September 27, 2011, magician Paul Zenon challenged Welsh psychic Leigh Catherine (aka Leigh-Catherine Salway) to take the one million dollar challenge and she accepted. Phillip Schofield, a This Morning host, stated that the program would pay for her flights to the US to be tested. Salway subsequently backed out of the challenge, claiming it was "dodgy" and "set up to make it impossible to pass".

Rejected applicants

Randi rejected an application from Rico Kolodzey, a breatharian who claimed to have survived without food since 1998. In 2006, Randi agreed to test Kolodzey's claims, but the two parties were unable to agree on the venue and method of the test.

Members of a group from Bali, referring to themselves as Yellow Bamboo, claimed one of their number, Pak Nyoman Serengen, could knock down an attacker at a distance, using only a piece of yellow bamboo. Video clips on their website showed a crowd of students running at Serengen, and falling to the ground when (or, in some cases, slightly before) Serengen extended his hand and shouted. The JREF arranged volunteers to carry out a preliminary investigation, but after the Yellow Bamboo group "threw every sort of obstacle in the way of that plan", Randi announced that he was terminating further involvement with them. A local volunteer contacted Randi offering to investigate the group unofficially. A low-resolution video showed the investigator being knocked to the ground during a preliminary test. The JREF pointed out that the test was not conducted according to the proposed protocol, with multiple flaws in the execution including being carried out at night. Upon viewing a set of still shots from the incident, several people experienced with stun-guns suggested that an electroshock weapon could have been used.

Tests at The Amazing Meeting

In July 2009, Danish psychic/dowser Connie Sonne was given the chance to prove her dowsing ability. She was asked to dowse some randomly selected cards hidden in envelopes and lost the challenge by selecting other incorrect ones. In an interview with Mark Edward afterward, she insisted that she lost merely because, "…it wasn't time yet for my powers to be revealed."

In July 2014, Chinese salesman Fei Wang was tested in front of an audience of 600 at the conclusion of The Amazing Meeting in Las Vegas. Wang said that from his right hand, he could transmit a mysterious force a distance of 91 centimeters (3 feet), unhindered by wood, metal, plastic or cardboard. The energy, he said, could be felt by others as heat, pressure, magnetism, or simply "an indescribable change." A total of nine people were selected by Wang as subjects who would be able to determine whether they were receiving the force from his hand. On stage, Wang and a control person were behind a curtain, and the subjects were in front of the curtain with eyes and ears covered so as not to be able to deduce who was behind the curtain. A colored ball was chosen randomly to determine whether Wang or the control person would go first, and in that order they tried to transmit the energy onto the subject's hand (hidden from their view inside a cardboard box). The subject then stated whether she had felt any energy and whether it came from the first or second person. Wang needed to be the person selected by at least 8 of the 9 subjects in order to win the million dollars. After both of the first two subjects failed to choose Wang, the challenge was over. Wang stated that he would try again the next year, saying, "This energy is mysterious".

Tech journalist Lee Hutchinson approached the JREF after writing an article for Ars Technica about directional Ethernet cables that claim to "keep your audio signal completely free of electromagnetic interference". At the 2015 Amazing Meeting, the MDC set up a controlled double-blind demonstration with volunteers listening to two identical recordings with a randomly selected Ethernet cable, a normal one or the cable claiming to improve the listening experience. After seven volunteers (1 hit, 1 miss and 5 hearing no difference), the demonstration was ended as they were unable to select the "enhanced" cable over the common cable enough times to satisfy the testing protocols.

Year Challenger Purported Ability Test Results Notes
2007 Derek Ogilvie Mediumship Identify which one out of ten toys is being used by a child at a particular time. Failed
2009 Connie Sonne Dowsing (Pendulum) Identify playing cards in sealed envelope. Failed
2010 Anita Ikonen Medical dowsing Determine by observation which of five subjects was missing a kidney. Failed Billed as "demonstration" not "test"
2011 No challenger available
2012 Andrew Needles Performance-enhancing bracelet Distinguish participants wearing real product significant number of times. Failed
2013 Brahim Addoun Remote viewing Remotely identify 3 of 20 objects. Failed
2014 Fei Wang Sending energy through his hand that can be felt by another person. The energy should be felt by the target person correctly eight out of nine times. Failed
2015 No claimant – "Demonstration test" Ethernet cables that are claimed to be "directional". Volunteers were played sound twice and were asked to determine which cable had the highest sound quality. Failed
  • Connie Sonne and Banachek at TAM 2009 Connie Sonne and Banachek at TAM 2009
  • Hal Bidlack, Derek Colanduno and others are "viewed" by paranormal applicant for a missing kidney – 2010. Hal Bidlack, Derek Colanduno and others are "viewed" by paranormal applicant for a missing kidney – 2010.
  • Performance-enhancing bracelet at TAM 2012 Performance-enhancing bracelet at TAM 2012
  • The 3 remote viewing objects from TAM 2013 The 3 remote viewing objects from TAM 2013
  • Richard Saunders in remote viewing room at TAM 2013 Richard Saunders in remote viewing room at TAM 2013
  • Fei Wang is applicant, Banachek and Richard Saunders are assisting TAM 2014 Fei Wang is applicant, Banachek and Richard Saunders are assisting TAM 2014
  • Demonstration test of Ethernet cables TAM13 – Grace Denman and volunteers – 2015 Demonstration test of Ethernet cables TAM13 – Grace Denman and volunteers – 2015

See also

References

  1. ^ The Board of Directors of JREF, Chip Denman and Rick Adams (September 1, 2015). "JREF Status". James Randi Educational Foundation. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  2. ^ "The Million Dollar Challenge". JREF. Retrieved April 11, 2020.
  3. ^ James Randi (January 28, 2015). "An AMAZ!NG adventure… to be continued". James Randi Educational Foundation. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  4. ^ "James Randi, Famed Magician and Paranormal Skeptic, Dead at 92". Rolling Stone. October 22, 2020.
  5. Higginbotham, Adam (November 7, 2014). "The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi". The New York Times.
  6. ^ "JREF Challenge FAQ". James Randi Educational Foundation. Archived from the original on December 12, 2012. Retrieved December 18, 2012.
  7. "The Demystifying Adventures of the Amazing Randi". Archived from the original on October 11, 2012. Retrieved September 5, 2009.SF Weekly, August 24, 2009, online version, p. 2: "One of his friends, Internet pioneer Rick Adams, put up $1 million in 1996."
  8. Poulsen, Kevin (January 12, 2007). "Skeptic Revamps $1M Psychic Prize". Wired.
  9. "SWIFT Newsletter January 4, 2008". Randi.org. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
  10. "Million Dollar Challenge Update: It's not ending!". Retrieved July 30, 2009. Announcement by Director Phil Plait on July 29, 2009
  11. Raphael, Seth (April 1, 2008). "Seth Raphael claims Randi's Million Dollar Challenge". YouTube. Archived from the original on December 20, 2021. Retrieved April 11, 2013.
  12. Crabtree, Sadie (March 9, 2011). "JREF's $1,000,000 Paranormal Challenge Now Easier Than Ever". James Randi Educational Foundation. Archived from the original on March 12, 2011.
  13. James Randi interview on Penn Radio, 2007-02-08
  14. "Challenge Info". JREF. Archived from the original on April 2, 2013. Retrieved April 10, 2013.
  15. "Challenge Applications". International Skeptics Forum. Retrieved June 10, 2016.
  16. Randi, James (1982). Flim-Flam!. Prometheus Books. pp. 307–324. ISBN 978-0879751982.
  17. Rawlins, Dennis (October 1981). "sTARBABY". Fate (34). Reprinted in "sTARBABY". Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Astrologie (The International Astrology Research Center). Retrieved September 9, 2006.
  18. Swift newsletter, vol. 2 no. 2, 1998 (p. 3)
  19. "Interview with Larry Birkhead" Larry King Live, CNN, 2007-01-26
  20. "Million Dollar Challenge financial statement" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 30, 2014. Retrieved June 12, 2014.
  21. "Are Psychics for Real?" Archived January 12, 2020, at the Wayback Machine CNN.com transcripts, March 6, 2001
  22. King, Larry (September 3, 2001). "Are Psychics Real?". CNN/Larry King Live. Retrieved August 18, 2006.
  23. "The Sylvia Browne Clock". Randi.org. Archived from the original on April 30, 2010. Retrieved May 13, 2010.
  24. Spiritual Medium Versus Paranormal Skeptic (Rosemary Altea versus James Randi) on Larry King Live June 5, 2001
  25. "Good Morning TV Clip". YouTube. Archived from the original on December 20, 2021.
  26. Leigh-Catherine (September 29, 2011). "Had a very interesting email re the Randi challenge today. As expected – dodgy as legally & set up to make it impossible to pass !" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  27. Marcus Rosenlund. "En hederlig lögnare". yle.fi.
  28. "Rejection of Yellow Bamboo's claim". Randi.org. October 3, 2003. Archived from the original on July 10, 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2009.
  29. "Yellow Bamboo may have used a stun gun to achieve his results". Randi.org. October 17, 2003. Archived from the original on July 9, 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2009.
  30. ^ Edward, Mark. "Connie's Conundrums". Skeptic Blog. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
  31. Higginbotham, Adam (November 7, 2014). "The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi". New York Times Magazine. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
  32. Hutchinson, Lee (February 10, 2015). "From the Minds of ARS to the audiophile, this $10,000 Ethernet cable apparently makes sense in reality, one-way silver cable does nothing but make "audiophools" poorer". Ars Technica. Retrieved July 25, 2015.
  33. "The audiophile's dilemma: strangers can't identify $340 cables, either". July 30, 2015. Retrieved July 31, 2015.

External links

Skeptic organizations
Pseudoscience
List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
Terminology
Topics
characterized as
pseudoscience
Medicine
Social science
Physics
Other
Promoters of
pseudoscience
Related topics
Resources
James Randi
The Amazing Randi
Books
Related articles
Categories: