Misplaced Pages

Ape: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:56, 21 June 2006 view sourceEal~enwiki (talk | contribs)113 edits Historical and modern terminology← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:07, 14 December 2024 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,409,084 edits Add: pmid, bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Otheruses4|the superfamily of primates|the acronym|APE}} {{Short description|Branch of primates}}
{{Distinguish-redirect|Hominoid|Hominid}}
{{Taxobox
{{About|the branch of primates}}
| color = pink
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
| name = Apes<ref name=MSW3>{{MSW3 Groves|pages=178-184}}</ref>
{{pp-move-indef}}
| image = Weisshandgibbon tierpark berlin.jpg
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2019}}
| image_width = 250px
{{automatic taxobox
| image_caption = ] (''Hylobates lar'')
| name = Hominoids<br/>Apes
| regnum = ]ia
| phylum = ] | fossil_range = ]-]
| image = 013 Alpha male chimpanzee at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
| classis = ]ia
| image_caption = Male ] (''Pan troglodytes'')
| ordo = ]s
| taxon = Hominoidea
| subordo = ]
| authority = ], 1825<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gray |first=J. E. |title=An outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into tribes and families, with a list of the genera apparently appertaining to each tribe. |url=http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1223371163&folder=122 |journal=Annals of Philosophy |series=New Series |volume=10 |pages=337–344 |access-date=27 April 2022 |archive-date=27 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220427185350/http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1223371163&folder=122 |url-status=live }}</ref>
| parvordo = ]
| superfamilia = '''Hominoidea''' | type_species = '']''
| type_species_authority = ], ]
| superfamilia_authority = ], 1825
| subdivision_ranks = ] | subdivision_ranks = Families
| subdivision = | subdivision = * †]
* †]
]<br>
* †]
]
* †]
* ]
* ]
}} }}


'''Apes''' (collectively '''Hominoidea''' {{IPAc-en|h|ɒ|m|ᵻ|ˈ|n|ɔɪ|d|i|.|ə}}) are a ] of ] ]s native to ] and ] (though they were more widespread in Africa, most of Asia, and Europe in prehistory, and counting humans are found globally). Apes are more closely related to ]s (family Cercopithecidae) than to the ]s (Platyrrhini) with both Old World monkeys and apes placed in the ] ]. Apes do not have tails due to a mutation of the ].<ref>{{Cite bioRxiv |last1=Xia |first1=Bo |last2=Zhang |first2=Weimin |last3=Wudzinska |first3=Aleksandra |last4=Huang |first4=Emily |last5=Brosh |first5=Ran |last6=Pour |first6=Maayan |last7=Miller |first7=Alexander |last8=Dasen |first8=Jeremy S. |last9=Maurano |first9=Matthew T. |last10=Kim |first10=Sang Y. |last11=Boeke |first11=Jef D. |date=2021-09-16 |title=The genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes |biorxiv=10.1101/2021.09.14.460388}}</ref><ref name="CNN-20240323">{{cite news |last=Weisberger |first=Mindy |title=Why don't humans have tails? Scientists find answers in an unlikely place |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/23/world/humans-tails-genetic-mutation-junk-dna-scn/index.html |date=March 23, 2024 |work=] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20240324031927/https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/23/world/humans-tails-genetic-mutation-junk-dna-scn/index.html |archivedate=March 24, 2024 |accessdate=March 24, 2024 }}</ref> In traditional and non-scientific use, the term ''ape'' can include tailless primates taxonomically considered Cercopithecidae (such as the ] and ]), and is thus not equivalent to the scientific ] Hominoidea. There are two extant branches of the superfamily Hominoidea: the ]s, or lesser apes; and the ]s, or ].
'''Apes''' are the members of the '''Hominoidea''' ] of ], which includes ]s. Under current classification, there are two ] of '''hominoids''':
* The family ], the lesser apes, include four genera and a total of 20 species of gibbon, including the ] and the ], all native to ]. They are highly arboreal and ] on the ground. They have lighter bodies and smaller social groups than great apes.
* The family ] (''hominids''), the great apes, include four genera comprising three extant species of ]s and their subspecies, two extant species of ]s and their subspecies, two extant species of ] and their subspecies, and ]s in a single extant subspecies.{{efn|name=DawkinsUse1|Although Dawkins is clear that he uses "apes" for Hominoidea, he also uses "great apes" in ways which exclude humans. Thus in {{Harvnb|Dawkins|2005}}: "Long before people thought in terms of evolution ... great apes were often confused with humans" (p. 114); "gibbons are faithfully monogamous, unlike the great apes which are our closer relatives" (p. 126).}}{{Sfn|Dixson|1981|pp=13}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Grehan |first=J. R. |year=2006 |title=Mona Lisa smile: the morphological enigma of human and great ape evolution |journal=Anatomical Record |volume=289B |pages=139–157 |doi=10.1002/ar.b.20107 |pmid=16865704 |issue=4 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=Benton2005p371/>


Except for gorillas and humans, hominoids are agile climbers of trees. Apes eat a variety of plant and animal foods, with the majority of food being plant foods, which can include fruits, leaves, stalks, roots and seeds, including nuts and grass seeds. Human diets are sometimes substantially different from that of other hominoids due in part to the development of technology and a wide range of habitation.
*the family ] consists of 4 genera and 12 species of ]s, including the ] and the ], collectively known as the "lesser apes"
*the family ] consisting of ]s, ]s, ]s, and humans, collectively known as the "great apes".


All non-human hominoids are rare and threatened with ]ion. The main threat is ], though some populations are further imperiled by hunting. The great apes of Africa are also facing threat from the ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |title=Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn |last=Rush |first=J. |date=23 January 2015 |work=The Independent |access-date=26 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150330035716/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |archive-date=30 March 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
A few other primates have the word "ape" in their common names, but they are not regarded as true apes.


== Name and terminology ==
Except for gorillas and humans, all true apes are agile climbers of trees. They are best described as ], their diet consisting of fruit, grass seeds, and in most cases some quantities of meat and invertebrates&mdash;either hunted or scavenged&mdash;along with anything else available and easily digested. They are native to ] and ], although humans have spread to all parts of the world.
{{Human timeline}}
"Ape", from Old English ''apa'', is a word of uncertain origin.<!---->{{efn|reference=The hypothetical Proto-Germanic form is given as ''*apōn'' (F. Kluge, ''Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache'' (2002), online version, s.v. ""; V. Orel, ''A handbook of Germanic etymology'' (2003), s.v. "" or as *''apa(n)'' (''Online Etymology Dictionary'' (2001–2014), s.v. ""; M. Philippa, F. Debrabandere, A. Quak, T. Schoonheim & N. van der Sijs, ''Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands'' (2003–2009), s.v. ""). Perhaps ultimately derived from a non-Indo-European language, the word might be a direct borrowing from Celtic, or perhaps from Slavic, although in both cases it is also argued that the borrowing, if it took place, went in the opposite direction.}} The term has a history of rather imprecise usage—and of comedic or punning usage in the vernacular. Its earliest meaning was generally of any non-human anthropoid primate, as is still the case for its cognates in other Germanic languages.{{efn|reference="Any simian known on the Mediterranean during the Middle Ages; monkey or ape"; cf. ''ape-ward'': "a juggler who keeps a trained monkey for the amusement of the crowd." (Middle English Dictionary, s.v. "").}}{{Sfn|Terry|1977|pp=3}}
Later, after the term "]" had been introduced into English, "ape" was specialized to refer to a tailless (therefore exceptionally human-like) primate.{{Sfn|Terry|1977|pp=3–4}} Thus, the term "ape" obtained two different meanings, as shown in the 1911 ] entry: it could be used as a synonym for "monkey" and it could denote the tailless human-like primate in particular.<ref name="EB1911">{{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Ape|volume=2|page=160}}</ref>


Some, or recently all, hominoids are also called "apes", but the term is used broadly and has several different senses within both popular and scientific settings. "Ape" has been used as a synonym for "monkey" or for naming any primate with a human-like appearance, particularly those without a tail.<ref name="EB1911"/> Biologists have traditionally used the term "ape" to mean a member of the superfamily Hominoidea ''other than'' humans,{{Sfn|Dixson|1981|pp=13}} but more recently to mean ''all'' members of Hominoidea. So "ape"—not to be confused with "great ape"—now becomes another word for '''hominoid''' ''including'' humans.<ref name=Benton2005p371/>{{efn|name=DawkinsUse2|{{Harvnb|Dawkins|2005}}; for example "ll apes except humans are hairy" (p. 99), "mong the apes, gibbons are second only to humans" (p. 126).}}
Most non-human ape species are rare or ]. The chief threat to most of the endangered species is loss of tropical rainforest habitat, though some populations are further imperiled by hunting for ].


The taxonomic term ''hominoid'' is derived from, and intended as encompassing, the '']s,'' the family of ]s. Both terms were introduced by Gray (1825).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gray |first=JE |title=An outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into tribes and families, with a list of the genera apparently appertaining to each tribe. |url=http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1223371163&folder=122 |journal=Annals of Philosophy |series=New Series |volume=10 |pages=337–344 |access-date=27 April 2022 |archive-date=27 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220427185350/http://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/index.php?s=1&act=pdfviewer&id=1223371163&folder=122 |url-status=live }}</ref> The term '']s'' is also due to Gray (1824), intended as including the human lineage (see also ], ]).
==Historical and modern terminology==
"Ape" (Old Eng. ''apa''; Dutch ''aap''; Old Ger. ''affo''; Welsh ''epa''; Old Czech ''op'') is a word of uncertain origin and is possibly an ] imitation of animal chatter. The term has a history of rather imprecise usage. Its earliest meaning was a tailless (and therefore exceptionally human-like) non-human primate, but as ] knowledge developed it became clear that taillessness occurred in a number of different and otherwise unrelated ].


The distinction between apes and monkeys is complicated by the traditional ] of monkeys: Apes emerged as a sister group of Old World Monkeys in the ], which are a sister group of New World Monkeys. Therefore, ], apes, catarrhines and related contemporary extinct groups such as ] are monkeys as well, for any consistent definition of "monkey". "Old World monkey" may also legitimately be taken to be meant to include all the catarrhines, including apes and extinct species such as '']'',<ref name="OsmanHill1953">{{Cite book |title=Primates Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy I—Strepsirhini |last=Osman Hill |first=W. C. |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |year=1953 |series=Edinburgh Univ Pubs Science & Maths, No 3 |pages=53 |oclc=500576914 |author-link=William Charles Osman Hill}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/generalintroduct00martrich |title=A General Introduction to the Natural History of Mammiferous Animals, With a Particular View of the Physical History of man, and the More Closely Allied Genera of the Order Quadrumana, or Monkeys |last=Martin |first=W. C. L. |publisher=Wright and Co. printers |year=1841 |location=London |pages=340, 361}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire |first=M. É. |date=1812 |title=Tableau des quadrumanes, ou des animaux composant le premier ordre de la classe des Mammifères |url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/23270#page/107/mode/1up |journal=Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle |location=Paris |volume=19 |pages=85–122 |access-date=16 July 2019 |archive-date=27 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327091031/https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/23270#page/107/mode/1up |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Bugge1974">{{Cite journal |last=Bugge |first=J. |date=1974 |title=Chapter 4 |journal=Cells Tissues Organs |volume=87 |issue=Suppl. 62 |pages=32–43 |doi=10.1159/000144209 |issn=1422-6405}}</ref>{{citation needed|date=October 2016}} in which case the apes, Cercopithecoidea and ''Aegyptopithecus'' emerged within the Old World monkeys.
The original usage of "ape" in English may have referred to the ], an ]n ]. Two tailless species of ] are commonly named as apes, the ] of North Africa (introduced into ]), ''Macaca sylvanus'', and the Sulawesi Black Ape or ], ''M. nigra''.


The primates called "apes" today became known to Europeans after the 18th century. As zoological knowledge developed, it became clear that taillessness occurred in a number of different and otherwise distantly related ]. Sir ] was one of those primatologists who developed the idea that there were trends in primate evolution and that the extant members of the order could be arranged in an "ascending series", leading from "monkeys" to "apes" to humans. Within this tradition "ape" came to refer to all members of the superfamily Hominoidea except humans.{{Sfn|Dixson|1981|pp=13}} As such, this use of "apes" represented a ] grouping, meaning that, even though all species of apes were descended from a common ancestor, this grouping did ''not'' include all the descendant species, because humans were excluded from being among the apes.{{efn|Definitions of ] vary; for the one used here see e.g. {{Harvnb|Stace|2010|pp=106}}}}
Until a handful of decades ago, humans were thought to be distinctly set apart from the other apes (even from the other great apes), so much so that many people still don't think of the term "apes" to include humans at all. However, it is not considered accurate by many biologists to think of apes in a biological sense without considering humans to be included. The terms "non-human apes" or "non-human great apes" is used with increasing frequency to show the relationship of humans to the other apes while yet talking only about the non-human species.


Traditionally, the English-language ] "apes" does not include humans, but phylogenetically, humans ('']'') form part of the family Hominidae within Hominoidea. Thus, there are at least three common, or traditional, uses of the term "ape": non-specialists may not distinguish between "monkeys" and "apes", that is, they may use the two terms interchangeably; or they may use "ape" for any tailless monkey or non-human hominoid; or they may use the term "ape" to just mean the non-human hominoids.
A group of apes may be referred to as a troop of apes or a shrewdness of apes. Both of these ]s seems to be equally common.]


Modern taxonomy aims for the use of ] groups for taxonomic classification;<ref name="SpringerHolley2011">{{cite book |author1=Springer |author2=D. H. |title=An Introduction to Zoology: Investigating the Animal World |date=1 July 2011 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Publishers |isbn=978-0-7637-5286-6 |pages=536 |quote=Through careful study taxonomists today struggle to eliminate polyphyletic and paraphyletic groups and taxons, reclassifying their members into appropriate monophyletic taxa}}</ref>{{efn|Definitions of ] vary; for the one used here see e.g. {{Harvnb|Mishler|2009|pp=114}}}}
==Biology==
Some literature may now use the common name "ape" to mean all members of the superfamily Hominoidea, including humans. For example, in his 2005 book, Benton wrote "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orang-utan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans".<ref name=Benton2005p371>{{Cite book |last=Benton |first=M. J. |year=2005 |title=Vertebrate Palaeontology |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-0-632-05637-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SyJO3vpCk8AC |access-date=10 July 2011 |archive-date=3 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230403152612/https://books.google.com/books?id=SyJO3vpCk8AC |url-status=live }}, p. 371</ref> Modern biologists and primatologists refer to apes that are not human as "non-human" apes. Scientists broadly, other than paleoanthropologists, may use the term "]" to identify ], replacing the term "]". See ].
The gibbon family, Hylobatidae, is composed of thirteen medium-sized species. Their major distinction are their long arms which they use to ] through the trees. As an evolutionary adaption to this ] lifestyle, their wrists are ball and socket joints. The largest of the gibbons, the ], weighs up to 23 kg (50 lb). In comparison, the smallest great ape is the ] at a modest 40 to 65 kg (88 to 143 lb).


See below, ], for a discussion of changes in scientific classification and terminology regarding hominoids.
The great ape family was previously referred to as ], and humans (and fossil hominids) were omitted from it, but on grounds of relatedness there is no argument for doing this. Chimpanzees, gorillas, humans and orangutans are all more closely related to one another than any of these four genera are to the gibbons. Awkwardly, however, the term "hominid" is still used with the specific meaning of extinct animals more closely related to humans than the other great apes (for example, ]s). It is now usual to use even finer divisions, such as ] and ]s to distinguish which hominoids are being discussed. Current evidence implies that humans share a common, extinct, ancestor with the chimpanzee line, from which we separated more recently than the gorilla line.


== Evolution ==
Both great apes and lesser apes fall within ], which also includes the ] of ] and ]. Within this group, both families of apes can be distinguished from these ]s by the number of cusps on their ]s (apes have five&mdash;the "Y-5" molar pattern, Old World monkeys have only four in a "bilophodont" pattern). Apes have more mobile shoulder joints and arms, ribcages that are flatter front-to-back, and a shorter, less mobile spine compared to Old World monkeys. These are all anatomical adaptations to vertical hanging and swinging locomotion (brachiation) in the apes. All living members of the Hylobatidae and Hominidae are tailless, and humans can therefore accurately be referred to as bipedal apes. However there are also primates in other families that lack tails, and at least one (the ]) that has been known to walk significant distances bipedally.
{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2021}}


Although the hominoid fossil record is far from complete, and the evidence is often fragmentary, there is enough to give a good outline of the evolutionary history of humans. The time of the split between humans and living apes used to be thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years ago, or even up to 30 or 40 million years ago. Some apes occurring within that time period, such as '']'', used to be considered as ]s, and possible ancestors of humans. Later fossil finds indicated that ''Ramapithecus'' was more closely related to the orangutan, and new biochemical evidence indicated that the last common ancestor of humans and other hominins occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago, and probably in the lower end of that range. Although the hominoid fossil record is still incomplete and fragmentary, there is now enough evidence to provide an outline of the ]. Previously, the divergence between humans and other extant hominoids was thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years ago, and several species of that time period, such as '']'', were once thought to be ]s and possible ancestors of humans. But, later fossil finds indicated that ''Ramapithecus'' was more closely related to the orangutan; and new biochemical evidence indicates that the last common ancestor of humans and non-hominins (that is, the chimpanzees) occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago, and probably nearer the lower end of that range (more recent); see ] (CHLCA).


== Taxonomic classification and phylogeny ==
==Cultural aspects of non-human apes==
{{main|List of hominoids}}
The intelligence and humanoid appearance of non-human apes are responsible for legends which attribute human qualities; for example, they are sometimes said to be able to speak but refuse to do so in order to avoid work. They are also said to be the result of a curse&mdash;a ] ] claims that one of the races who built the ] became non-human apes as punishment, while ] lore says that the Jews of ] became non-human apes as punishment for ] on the ]. ] folklore claims that non-human apes are a symbol of ] and were created by ] in response to ]'s creation of humans. It is uncertain whether any of these references is to any specific non-human apes, since all date from a period when the distinction between non-human apes and monkeys was not widely understood, or not understood at all.


Genetic analysis combined with fossil evidence indicates that hominoids diverged from the ]s about 25 million years ago (mya), near the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/fossils-may-pinpoint-critical-split-between-apes-and-monkeys |title=Fossils may pinpoint critical split between apes and monkeys |date=15 May 2013 |access-date=30 June 2022 |archive-date=16 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221216065413/https://www.science.org/content/article/fossils-may-pinpoint-critical-split-between-apes-and-monkeys |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rossie |first1=J. B. |last2=Hill |first2=A. |year=2018 |title=A new species of ''Simiolus'' from the middle Miocene of the Tugen Hills, Kenya |journal=Journal of Human Evolution |volume=125 |pages=50–58 |doi=10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.09.002 |pmid=30502897|bibcode=2018JHumE.125...50R |s2cid=54625375 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rasmussen |first1=D. T. |last2=Friscia |first2=A. R. |last3=Gutierrez |first3=M. |display-authors=3 |last4=Kappelman |first4=J. |last5=Miller |first5=E. R. |last6=Muteti |first6=S. |last7=Reynoso |first7=D. |last8=Rossie |first8=J. B. |last9=Spell |first9=T. L. |last10=Tabor |first10=N. J. |last11=Gierlowski-Kordesch |first11=E. |last12=Jacobs |first12=B. F. |last13=Kyongo |first13=B. |last14=Macharwas |first14=M. |last15=Muchemi |first15=F. |year=2019 |title=Primitive Old World monkey from the earliest Miocene of Kenya and the evolution of cercopithecoid bilophodonty |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=116 |issue=13 |pages=6051–6056 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1815423116 |pmid=30858323 |pmc=6442627 |bibcode=2019PNAS..116.6051R |doi-access=free}}</ref> The gibbons split from the rest about 18 mya, and the hominid splits happened 14 mya (''Pongo''),<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Alba |first1=D. M. |last2=Fortuny |first2=J. |last3=Moyà-Solà |first3=S. |date=2010 |title=Enamel thickness in the Middle Miocene great apes ''Anoiapithecus'', ''Pierolapithecus'' and ''Dryopithecus'' |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences |volume=277 |issue=1691 |pages=2237–2245 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2010.0218|issn=0962-8452 |pmc=2880156 |pmid=20335211}}</ref> 7 mya (''Gorilla''), and 3–5 mya (''Homo'' & ''Pan'').<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Grabowski |first1=M. |last2=Jungers |first2=W. L. |date=2017 |title=Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes |journal=Nature Communications |volume=8 |issue=1 |pages=880 |bibcode=2017NatCo...8..880G |doi=10.1038/s41467-017-00997-4|issn=2041-1723 |pmc=5638852 |pmid=29026075}}</ref><!-- note, this figure of 3-5 mya for the Homo/Pan split differs from the figure in the article ], which says 6.5-7.4 mya or alternatively 5.4-6.3 mya--> In 2015, a new genus and species were described, '']'', which lived 11.6 mya, and appears to predate the split between Hominidae and Hylobatidae.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://phys.org/news/2015-10-primate-species-root-tree-extant.html |title=A new primate species at the root of the tree of extant hominoids |date=29 October 2015 |access-date=29 October 2015 |archive-date=29 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151029203847/http://phys.org/news/2015-10-primate-species-root-tree-extant.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Nengo |first1=I. |last2=Tafforeau |first2=P. |last3=Gilbert |first3=C. C. |display-authors=3 |last4=Fleagle |first4=J. G. |last5=Miller |first5=E. R. |last6=Feibel |first6=C. |last7=Fox |first7=D. L. |last8=Feinberg |first8=J. |last9=Pugh |first9=K. D. |year=2017 |title=New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape evolution |url=http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1570349/1/Spoor_Nengo-et-al_text.pdf |journal=Nature |volume=548 |issue=7666 |pages=169–174 |bibcode=2017Natur.548..169N |doi=10.1038/nature23456|pmid=28796200|s2cid=4397839 |access-date=15 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180722103154/http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1570349/1/Spoor_Nengo-et-al_text.pdf |archive-date=22 July 2018 |url-status=dead}}</ref>{{Sfn|Dixson|1981|p=16}}<ref name="Benton2005p371" />{{clarify |date=July 2019 |reason=It's not clear which of these sources contains the cladogram shown, and it would be SYNTH to combine cladograms from different sources}}
Humans and the other apes share many similarities, including the ability to properly use tools and imitate others. Recent studies at ] test some of these similarities. A professor and his/her students gave a challenge to baby humans and baby chimps. Both groups were shown a way that might solve the challenge. However what both the baby humans and chimps did not know was that the way that was shown was incorrect. Both times the baby humans tried they imitated what they were shown and failed at the attempt. For the chimps, the first time they tried, they followed the same path and failed. However on a second time around they succeeded in finding a new path and actually completed the objective. The professor interpreted that baby chimps learned from experience while baby humans just imitated what they were shown. This gave scientists key information in understanding the cultural aspects of ape life and evolutionary similarities between humans and apes.
{{Clade|{{Clade
|label1='''(29)'''
|1={{Clade
|1=] (†28)
|label2='''] (24)'''
|2={{Clade
|1=] (†19)
|2=''']'''
}}
}}
|label2='''Hominoidea (30)'''
|2={{Clade
|1=] (†7 Mya)
|label2=
|2={{clade
|1='']'' (†17 Mya)
|2={{clade
|1={{clade
|2='']'' (†17 Mya)
|1=] (†18 Mya)
}}
|label2='''(29)'''
|2={{Clade
|1='']'' (†16)
|2='']'' (†11.6 Mya)
|label3='''(29)'''
|3={{Clade
|label1=] (28)
|1={{Clade
|1='']'' (†20)


|2='']'' (†16)
There have also been recent breakthroughs in evidence of ape culture that go beyond what was explained above. This was further explored by scientists at the convention in St. Louis.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://livescience.com/animalworld/060228_ape_culture.html | publisher = Livescience.com | year = ] | title = Case Closed: Apes Got Culture | author = Corey Binns}}</ref>
}}
|label2='''Crown Hominoidea (22)'''
|2={{Clade
|1=''']'''
|2=''']'''
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}}}}}|label1='''] (31)'''|style1=line-height:80%;font-size:80%}}
{{Clade|style=line-height:80%;font-size:80%
|label1=] (31.0 Mya)
|1={{Clade
|grouplabel1=<br><br><br>Traditional apes
|label1=Hominoidea/apes (20.4 Mya)
|1={{Clade
|label1=]/great apes (15.7 Mya)
|1={{Clade
|label1=] (8.8 Mya)
|1={{Clade
|label1=] (6.3 Mya)
|1={{Clade
|1=humans&nbsp;(genus&nbsp;''Homo'') ]
|2=chimpanzees&nbsp;(genus&nbsp;''Pan'') ]|barbegin2=purple
}}
|2=gorillas&nbsp;(genus ''Gorilla'') ]|bar2=purple
}}
|2=orangutans&nbsp;(genus ''Pongo'') ]|bar2=purple
}}
|2=gibbons/lesser apes (family&nbsp;Hylobatidae) ]|barend2=purple
}}
|2=] ]&nbsp;Old World monkeys
}}
}}


], the "great apes"; and ], the gibbons, or "lesser apes".]]
==New Subspecies?==
In 2002, a new giant ape troop was discovered in the ]. These apes share many features of both chimpanzees and gorillas. According to a report from ],<ref>{{cite web | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3730574.stm | title = 'New' giant ape found in DR Congo | publisher = ] | year = ]}}</ref>, the apes have large black faces, are two meters (6 feet) tall and make nests on the ground, all like gorillas. However, they live hundreds of kilometers from any other gorilla troops, and their diet is high in fruits, similar to the chimpanzee diet. They were given the common name of ].


]
Subsequent molecular investigation of hair and pelt samples showed them to be ]s who had individually adapted to local conditions. This would indicate that they may be a subspecies of the common chimp.


The families, and extant genera and species of hominoids are:
==History of hominoid taxonomy==
* '''Superfamily Hominoidea'''<ref name=MSW3/>
The history of hominoid taxonomy is somewhat confusing and complex. The names of subgroups have changed their meaning over time as new evidence from fossil discoveries, anatomy comparisons and DNA sequences, has changed understanding of the relationships between hominoids. The story of the hominoid taxonomy is one of gradual demotion of humans from a special position in the taxonomy to being one branch among many. It also illustrates the growing influence of ] (the science of classifying living things by strict descent) on taxonomy.
** Family ]: hominids ("great apes")
*** Genus '']'': orangutans
**** ], ''P. pygmaeus''
**** ], ''P. abelii''
**** ], ''P. tapanuliensis''<ref name="NYT-20171102">{{cite news |last=Cochrane |first=J. |title=New Orangutan Species Could Be the Most Endangered Great Ape |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/science/new-orangutan-species.html |date=2 November 2017 |work=] |access-date=3 November 2017 |archive-date=17 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417014924/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/02/science/new-orangutan-species.html |url-status=live }}</ref>
*** Genus '']'': gorillas
**** ], ''G. gorilla''
**** ], ''G. beringei''
*** Genus '']'': humans
**** ], ''H. sapiens''
*** Genus '']'': chimpanzees
**** ], ''P. troglodytes''
**** ], ''P. paniscus''
** Family ]: gibbons ("lesser apes")
*** Genus '']''
**** ] or white-handed gibbon, ''H. lar''
**** ], ''H. albibarbis''
**** ] or black-handed gibbon, ''H. agilis''
****] or Abbott's grey gibbon, ''H. abbotti''<ref name=":1">{{Cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Don E. |last2=Cavallini |first2=Paolo |date=2013 |title=Handbook of the Mammals of the World |location=Barcelona |publisher=Lynx Edicions |isbn=978-84-96553-89-7 |oclc=1222638259}}</ref>
**** ] or northern grey gibbon, ''H. funereus''<ref name=":1" />
**** ] or southern grey gibbon, ''H. muelleri''
**** ], ''H. moloch''
**** ] or capped gibbon, ''H. pileatus''
**** ] or Mentawai gibbon or bilou, ''H. klossii''
*** Genus '']''
**** ], ''H. hoolock''
**** ], ''H. leuconedys''
**** ], ''H. tianxing''<!--as per wiki article on Gibbons-->
*** Genus '']''
**** ], ''S. syndactylus''
*** Genus '']''
**** ], ''N. annamensis''<!--as per wiki article on Gibbons-->
**** ], ''N. concolor''
**** ], ''N. nasutus''
**** ], ''N. hainanus''
**** ] ''N. siki''
**** ], ''N. leucogenys''
**** ], ''N. gabriellae''


=== History of hominoid taxonomy ===
], there are eight extant ] of hominoids. They are the four great ape genera ('']'' (humans), '']'' (chimpanzees), '']'', and '']'' (orangutans)), and the four genera of ]s ('']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'').<ref name=MSW3/> (The genus for the ]s was recently changed from '']'' to ''Hoolock''.<ref name=Mootnick>{{cite journal | last = Mootnick | first = A. | coauthors = Groves, C. P. | year = 2005 | title = A new generic name for the hoolock gibbon (Hylobatidae) | journal = International Journal of Primatology | issue = 26 | pages = 971-976}}</ref>)
{{see|Human taxonomy#History}}


The history of hominoid taxonomy is complex and somewhat confusing. Recent evidence has changed our understanding of the relationships between the hominoids, especially regarding the human lineage; and the traditionally used terms have become somewhat confused. Competing approaches to methodology and terminology are found among current scientific sources. Over time, authorities have changed the names and the meanings of names of groups and subgroups as new evidence — that is, new discoveries of fossils and tools and of observations in the field, plus continual comparisons of anatomy and ] — has changed the understanding of relationships between hominoids. There has been a gradual demotion of humans from being 'special' in the taxonomy to being one branch among many. This recent turmoil (of history) illustrates the growing influence on all taxonomy of ], the science of classifying living things strictly according to their lines of descent.{{citation needed|date=December 2021}}
In 1758, ], relying on second- or third-hand accounts, placed a second species in ''Homo'' along with ''H. sapiens'': ''Homo troglodytes'' ("cave-dwelling man"). It is not clear to which animal this name refers, as Linnaeus had no specimen to refer to, hence no precise description. Linnaeus named the orangutan ''Simia satyrus'' ("satyr monkey"). He placed the three genera ''Homo'', '']'' and ''Lemur'' in the family of Primates.


Today, there are eight extant ] of hominoids. They are the four genera in the family Hominidae, namely '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''; plus four genera in the family Hylobatidae (gibbons): '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref name=MSW3>{{MSW3 Groves|pages=178–184|id=12100751}}</ref> (The two subspecies of ] were recently moved from the genus '']'' to the new genus ''Hoolock'' and re-ranked as species; a third species was described in January 2017).<ref name="Mootnick">{{cite journal |last1=Mootnick |first1=A. |last2=Groves |first2=C. P. |year=2005 |title=A new generic name for the hoolock gibbon (Hylobatidae) |journal=International Journal of Primatology |issue=4 |pages=971–976 |doi=10.1007/s10764-005-5332-4 |volume=26 |s2cid=8394136}}</ref>
The ''troglodytes'' name was used for the chimpanzee by ] in 1775 but moved to the genus ''Simia''. The orangutan was moved to the genus '']'' in 1799 by ].


In 1758, ], relying on second- or third-hand accounts, placed a second species in ''Homo'' along with ''H. sapiens'': ''Homo troglodytes'' ("cave-dwelling man"). Although the term "Orang Outang" is listed as a variety – ''Homo sylvestris'' – under this species, it is nevertheless not clear to which animal this name refers, as Linnaeus had no specimen to refer to, hence no precise description. Linnaeus may have based ''Homo troglodytes'' on reports of mythical creatures, then-unidentified ]s, or Asian natives dressed in animal skins.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Frängsmyr |first1=T. |last2=Lindroth |first2=S. |last3=Eriksson |first3=G. |last4=Broberg |first4=G. |title=Linnaeus, the man and his work |year=1983 |publisher=] |location=Berkeley and Los Angeles |isbn=978-0-7112-1841-3}}, p. 166</ref> Linnaeus named the orangutan ''Simia satyrus'' ("satyr monkey"). He placed the three genera ''Homo'', '']'' and ''Lemur'' in the order of Primates.
Linnaeus's inclusion of humans in the primates with monkeys and apes was troubling for people who denied a close relationship between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom. Linneaus's Lutheran ] had accused him of "impiety." In a letter to ] dated ], ], Linnaeus wrote:


The ''troglodytes'' name was used for the chimpanzee by ] in 1775, but moved to the genus ''Simia''. The orangutan was moved to the genus '']'' in 1799 by ].
:It is not pleasing to me that I must place ] among the ]s, but man is intimately familiar with himself. Let's not quibble over words. It will be the same to me whatever name is applied. But I desperately seek from you and from the whole world a general difference between men and ]s from the principles of ]. I certainly know of none. If only someone might tell me one! If I called man a ] or vice versa I would bring together all the ] against me. Perhaps I ought to, in accordance with the law of Natural History.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://linnaeus.c18.net/Letters/display_txt.php?id_letter=L0783 | title = Letter, Carl Linnaeus to Johann Georg Gmelin. Uppsala, Sweden, 25 February 1747 | publisher = Swedish Linnaean Society}}</ref>


Linnaeus's inclusion of humans in the primates with monkeys and apes was troubling for people who denied a close relationship between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom. Linnaeus's Lutheran archbishop had accused him of "impiety". In a letter to ] dated 25 February 1747, Linnaeus wrote:
Accordingly, ] in the first edition of his ''Manual of Natural History'' (1779), proposed that the primates be divided into the ] (four-handed, i.e. apes and monkeys) and ] (two-handed, ie. humans). This distinction was taken up by other naturalists, most notably ]. Some elevated the distinction to the level of ].


{{Blockquote|text=It is not pleasing to me that I must place humans among the primates, but man is intimately familiar with himself. Let's not quibble over words. It will be the same to me whatever name is applied. But I desperately seek from you and from the whole world a general difference between men and simians from the principles of Natural History. I certainly know of none. If only someone might tell me one! If I called man a simian or vice versa I would bring together all the theologians against me. Perhaps I ought to, in accordance with the law of Natural History.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://linnaeus.c18.net/Letters/display_txt.php?id_letter=L0783 |title=Letter, Carl Linnaeus to Johann Georg Gmelin. Uppsala, Sweden, 25 February 1747 |publisher=Swedish Linnaean Society |access-date=4 February 2009 |archive-date=27 February 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090227174240/http://linnaeus.c18.net/Letters/display_txt.php?id_letter=L0783 |url-status=live }}</ref>}}
However, the many affinities between humans and other primates — and especially the great apes — made it clear that the distinction made no scientific sense. ] wrote, in '']'':


Accordingly, ] in the first edition of his ''Manual of Natural History'' (1779), proposed that the primates be divided into the ] (four-handed, i.e. apes and monkeys) and ] (two-handed, i.e. humans). This distinction was taken up by other naturalists, most notably ]. Some elevated the distinction to the level of ].
:The greater number of naturalists who have taken into consideration the whole structure of man, including his mental faculties, have followed ] and ], and have placed man in a separate Order, under the title of the Bimana, and therefore on an equality with the orders of the Quadrumana, ], etc. Recently many of our best naturalists have recurred to the view first propounded by ], so remarkable for his sagacity, and have placed man in the same Order with the Quadrumana, under the title of the Primates. The justice of this conclusion will be admitted: for in the first place, we must bear in mind the comparative insignificance for classification of the great development of the brain in man, and that the strongly-marked differences between the skulls of man and the Quadrumana (lately insisted upon by ], ], and others) apparently follow from their differently developed brains. In the second place, we must remember that nearly all the other and more important differences between man and the Quadrumana are manifestly adaptive in their nature, and relate chiefly to the erect position of man; such as the structure of his hand, foot, and pelvis, the curvature of his spine, and the position of his head.<ref>{{cite book | author = ] | title = ] | year = 1871}}</ref>


However, the many affinities between humans and other primates – and especially the "great apes" – made it clear that the distinction made no scientific sense. In his 1871 book '']'', ] wrote:
<!-- ...history from 1870 to 1960 goes here... -->


{{Blockquote|text=The greater number of naturalists who have taken into consideration the whole structure of man, including his mental faculties, have followed Blumenbach and Cuvier, and have placed man in a separate Order, under the title of the Bimana, and therefore on an equality with the orders of the Quadrumana, Carnivora, etc. Recently many of our best naturalists have recurred to the view first propounded by Linnaeus, so remarkable for his sagacity, and have placed man in the same Order with the Quadrumana, under the title of the Primates. The justice of this conclusion will be admitted: for in the first place, we must bear in mind the comparative insignificance for classification of the great development of the brain in man, and that the strongly marked differences between the skulls of man and the Quadrumana (lately insisted upon by ], ], and others) apparently follow from their differently developed brains. In the second place, we must remember that nearly all the other and more important differences between man and the Quadrumana are manifestly adaptive in their nature, and relate chiefly to the erect position of man; such as the structure of his hand, foot, and pelvis, the curvature of his spine, and the position of his head.<ref>{{cite book |first=C. |last=Darwin |title=The Descent of Man |year=1871 |isbn=978-0-7607-7814-2| title-link=The Descent of Man |publisher=Barnes & Noble |author-link=Charles Darwin}}</ref>}} <!-- ...history from 1870 to 1960 goes here... -->
]
Until about 1960, the hominoids were usually divided into two families: humans and their extinct relatives in ], the other apes in ].<ref>{{cite journal | author = ] | year = 1945 | title = The principles of classification and a classification of mammals | journal = Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. | volume = 85 | pages = 1–350}}</ref>


=== Changes in taxonomy and terminology ===
<br style="clear:both"/>
{{see also|Hominidae|Human taxonomy}}
]
{| class="wikitable"
The 1960s saw the application of techniques from ] to primate taxonomy. Goodman used his 1963 immunological study of serum proteins to propose a division of the hominoids into three families, with the non-human great apes in Pongidae and the lesser apes (gibbons) in ].<ref>{{cite book | author = M. Goodman | year = 1963 | chapter = Man’s place in the phylogeny of the primates as reflected in serum proteins | editor = S. L. Washburn | title = Classification and human evolution | publisher = Aldine, Chicago | pages = 204–234}}</ref> The ] of hominoid families, however, prompted scientists to ask which family ] first from the common hominoid ancestor.
| '''Humans the non-apes''': Until about 1960, taxonomists typically divided the superfamily Hominoidea into two families. The science community treated humans and their extinct relatives as the ] within the superfamily; that is, humans were considered as quite distant from kinship with the "apes". Humans were classified as the family ] and were known as the "hominids". All other hominoids were known as "apes" and were referred to the family ].<ref>{{cite journal |last=G. G. |first=Simpson |year=1945 |title=The principles of classification and a classification of mammals |journal=Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History |volume=85 |pages=1–350 |author-link=George Gaylord Simpson}}</ref>
| ]
|-
| '''The "great apes" in Pongidae''': The 1960s saw the methodologies of ] applied to primate taxonomy. Goodman's 1964 immunological study of serum proteins led to re-classifying the hominoids into three families: the humans in Hominidae; the great apes in Pongidae; and the "lesser apes" (gibbons) in ].<ref name=Goodman>{{cite book |first=M. |last=Goodman |year=1964 |chapter=Man's place in the phylogeny of the primates as reflected in serum proteins |editor-first=S. L. |editor-last=Washburn |title=Classification and Human Evolution |publisher=Aldine |location=Chicago |pages=204–234}}</ref> However, this arrangement had two ]: ''Pan'', ''Gorilla'', and ''Pongo'' of the "great apes" in Pongidae, and Hominidae, Pongidae, and Hylobatidae in Hominoidea. These presented a puzzle; scientists wanted to know which genus ] first from the common hominoid ancestor.
| ]
|-
| '''Gibbons the outgroup''': New studies indicated that ]s, not humans, are the ] within the superfamily Hominoidea, meaning: the rest of the hominoids are more closely related to each other than (any of them) are to the gibbons. With this splitting, the gibbons (''Hylobates'', ''et al''.) were isolated after moving the great apes into the same family as humans. Now the term "hominid" encompassed a larger collective taxa within the family Hominidae. With the family trichotomy settled, scientists could now work to learn which genus is 'least' related to the others in the subfamily Ponginae.
| ]
|-
| '''Orangutans the outgroup''': Investigations comparing humans and the three other hominid genera disclosed that the African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas) and humans are more closely related to each other than any of them are to the Asian orangutans (''Pongo''); that is, the ]s, not humans, are the ] within the family Hominidae. This led to reassigning the African apes to the subfamily Homininae with humans—which presented a new three-way split: ''Homo'', ''Pan'', and ''Gorilla''.<ref name=Goodman1>{{cite journal |title=Biochemical evidence on hominid phylogeny |first=M. |last=Goodman |journal=Annual Review of Anthropology |volume=3 |issue=1 |pages=203–228 |year=1974 |doi=10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.001223}}</ref>
| ]
|-
| '''Hominins''': In an effort to resolve the trichotomy, while preserving the nostalgic "outgroup" status of humans, the subfamily Homininae was divided into two tribes: Gorillini, comprising genus ''Pan'' and genus ''Gorilla''; and Hominini, comprising genus ''Homo'' (the humans). Humans and close relatives now began to be known as "hominins", that is, of the tribe Hominini. Thus, the term "hominin" succeeded to the previous use of "hominid", which meaning had changed with changes in Hominidae (see above: 3rd graphic, "Gibbons the outgroup").
| ]
|-
| '''Gorillas the outgroup''': New DNA comparisons now provided evidence that ], not humans, are the outgroup in the subfamily Homininae; this suggested that chimpanzees should be grouped with humans in the tribe Hominini, but in separate subtribes.<ref name=Goodman2>{{cite journal |title=Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids |first1=M. |last1=Goodman |first2=D. A. |last2=Tagle |first3=D. H. |last3=Fitch |first4=W. |display-authors=3 |last4=Bailey |first5=J. |last5=Czelusniak |first6=B. F. |last6=Koop |first7=P. |last7=Benson |first8=J. L. |last8=Slightom |journal=Journal of Molecular Evolution |year=1990 |volume=30 |pages=260–266 |doi = 10.1007/BF02099995 |pmid=2109087 |issue=3 |bibcode=1990JMolE..30..260G |s2cid=2112935}}</ref> Now the name "hominin" delineated ''Homo'' plus those earliest ''Homo'' relatives and ancestors that arose ''after'' the divergence from the chimpanzees. (Humans are no longer recognized as an outgroup, but are a branch, ] of the pre-1960s ape group).
| ]
|-
| '''Speciation of gibbons''': Later DNA comparisons disclosed previously unknown speciation of genus ''Hylobates'' (gibbons) into four genera: '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.<ref name=MSW3/><ref name=Mootnick/> The ordering of speciation of these four genera are being ] {{As of|2022|lc=yes}}.
| ]
|}


== Characteristics ==
<br style="clear:both"/>
{{Unreferenced section|date=July 2011}}
]
], or movement by swinging in tree branches.]]
Within the superfamily Hominoidea, gibbons are the ]: this means that the rest of the hominoids are more closely related to each other than any of them are to gibbons. This led to the placing of the other great apes into the family Hominidae along with humans, by demoting the Pongidae to a subfamily; the Hominidae family now contained the subfamilies ] and ]. Again, the three-way split in Ponginae led scientists to ask which of the three genera is least related to the others.


The lesser apes are the gibbon family, Hylobatidae, of sixteen species; all are native to Asia. Their major differentiating characteristic is their long arms, which they use to ] through trees. Their wrists are ]s as an evolutionary adaptation to their ] lifestyle. Generally smaller than the African apes, the largest gibbon, the ], weighs up to {{convert|14|kg|lb|0|abbr=on}}; in comparison, the smallest "great ape", the ], is {{convert|34|to|60|kg|lb|0|abbr=on}}.
<br style="clear:both"/>
]
Investigation showed ]s to be the outgroup, but comparing humans to all three other hominid genera showed that African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas) and humans are more closely related to each other than any of them are to orangutans. This led to the placing of the African apes in the subfamily Homininae, forming another three-way split. This classification was first proposed by M. Goodman in 1974.<ref>{{cite journal | journal = Annual Review of Anthropology | volume = 3 | pages = 203–228 | year = 1974 | url = http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.001223 | title = Biochemical Evidence on Hominid Phylogeny | author = M. Goodman}}</ref>


The superfamily Hominoidea falls within the ] ], which also includes the Old World monkeys of Africa and Eurasia. Within this grouping, the two families Hylobatidae and Hominidae can be distinguished from Old World monkeys by the number of ] on their ]; hominoids have five in the "Y-5" molar pattern, whereas Old World monkeys have only four in a ] pattern.
<br style="clear:both"/>
]
To try to resolve the hominine trichotomy, some authors proposed the division of the subfamily Homininae into the tribes Gorillini (African apes) and Hominini (humans).


Further, in comparison with Old World monkeys, hominoids are noted for: more mobile shoulder joints and arms due to the dorsal position of the ]; broader ribcages that are flatter front-to-back; and a shorter, less mobile spine, with greatly reduced caudal (tail) vertebrae—resulting in complete loss of the tail in extant hominoid species. These are anatomical adaptations, first, to vertical hanging and swinging locomotion (]) and, later, to developing balance in a ] pose. Note there are primates in other families that also lack tails, and at least one, the ], is known to walk significant distances bipedally. The front of the ape skull is characterised by its sinuses, fusion of the frontal bone, and by ].
<br style="clear:both"/>
]
However, DNA comparisons provide convincing evidence that within the subfamily Homininae, gorillas are the outgroup. This suggests that chimpanzees should be in Hominini along with humans. This classification was first proposed (though one rank lower) by M. Goodman et. al. in 1990.<ref>{{cite journal | journal = Journal of Molecular Evolution | year = 1990 | volume = 30 | pages = 260–266 | url = http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2109087&dopt=Abstract | title = Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids | author = M. Goodman, D. A. Tagle, D. H. Fitch, W. Bailey, J. Czelusniak, B. F. Koop, P. Benson, J. L. Slightom}}</ref>


=== Distinction from monkeys ===
<br style="clear:both"/>
{{See also|Monkey#Historical and modern terminology}}
]
Later DNA comparisons split the gibbon genus ''Hylobates'' into four genera: '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.<ref name=MSW3/><ref name=Mootnick/>


], apes, catarrhines, and extinct species such as ] and ]a, are monkeys,{{citation needed|date=October 2016}} so one can only specify ape features not present in other monkeys.
<br clear=all>


Unlike most ]s, apes do not possess a tail. Monkeys are more likely to be in trees and use their tails for balance. While the great apes are considerably larger than monkeys, ]s (lesser apes) are smaller than some monkeys. Apes are considered to be more intelligent than monkeys, which are considered to have more primitive brains.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Gestural Communication of Apes and Monkeys |first1=J. |last1=Call |first2=M. |last2=Tomasello |year=2007 |publisher=Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates}}</ref>
==Classification and evolution==
As discussed above, hominoid taxonomy has undergone several changes. Current understanding is that the apes diverged from the ]s about 25 million years ago. The lesser and greater apes split about 18 mya, and the hominid splits happen 14 mya (''Pongo''), 7 mya (''Gorilla''), and 3-5 mya (''Homo'' & ''Pan'')


The enzyme ] has become inactive in all apes, its function having been lost in two ] lineages during the middle Miocene; first in the common ancestors of Hominidae, and later in the common ancestor of Hylobatidae. It has been hypothesized that in both incidents it was a mutation that occurred in apes living in Europe when the climate was getting colder, leading to starvation during winter. The mutation changed the biochemistry of the apes and made it easier to accumulate fat, which allowed the animals to survive longer periods of starvation. When they migrated to Asia and Africa, this genetic trait remained.<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=3203212 | year=2011 | last1=Johnson | first1=R. J. | last2=Lanaspa | first2=M. A. | last3=Gaucher | first3=E. A. | title=Uric acid: A Danger Signal from the RNA World that may have a role in the Epidemic of Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and CardioRenal Disease: Evolutionary Considerations | journal=Seminars in Nephrology | volume=31 | issue=5 | pages=394–399 | doi=10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.08.002 | pmid=22000645 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-mutation-in-apes-may-explain-human-obesity-and-diabetes/ | doi=10.1038/scientificamerican1015-64 | title=The Fat Gene | year=2015 | last1=Johnson | first1=Richard J. | last2=Andrews | first2=Peter | journal=Scientific American | volume=313 | issue=4 | pages=64–69 | bibcode=2015SciAm.313d..64J }}</ref>
* '''Superfamily Hominoidea'''<ref name=MSW3/>
** Family ]: gibbons
*** Genus '']''
*** Genus '']''
*** Genus '']''
*** Genus '']''
** Family ]: great apes
*** Genus '']'': orangutans
*** Genus '']'': gorillas
*** Genus '']'': humans
*** Genus '']'': chimpanzees


==Legal status== == Behaviour ==
Human beings are the only ape recognized as ]s and protected in law by the ] ]<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html | title = Universal Declaration of Human Rights | year = ] | publisher = United Nations}}</ref> and by all governments, though to varying degrees. Chimpanzees, Gorillas and Orangutans are not classified as ], which means that where their interests intersect with that of humans they have no legal status.


Major studies of behaviour in the field were completed on the three better-known "great apes", for example by ], ] and ]. These studies have shown that in their natural environments, the non-human hominoids show sharply varying social structure: gibbons are monogamous, territorial pair-bonders, orangutans are solitary, gorillas live in small troops with a single adult male leader, while chimpanzees live in larger troops with bonobos exhibiting promiscuous sexual behaviour. Their diets also vary; gorillas are ]s, while the others are all primarily ]s, although the common chimpanzee hunts for meat. Foraging behaviour is correspondingly variable.
Many argue that the other apes' cognitive capacity in itself, as well as their close genetic relationship to human beings, dictates an acknowledgement of personhood. The ], founded by Australian philosopher ], is campaigning to have the United Nations endorse its ], which would extend to all species of ]s, ]s, and ]s the protection of three basic interests: the right to life, the protection of individual ], and the prohibition of ].

In November 2023, scientists reported, for the first time, evidence that groups of ]s, including apes, and, particularly ]s, are capable of cooperating with each other.<ref name="NYT-20231116">{{cite news |last=Zimmer |first=Carl |authorlink=Carl Zimmer |title=Scientists Find First Evidence That Groups of Apes Cooperate - Some bonobos are challenging the notion that humans are the only primates capable of group-to-group alliances. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/science/bonobos-cooperation-study.html |date=16 November 2023 |work=] |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231116194259/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/16/science/bonobos-cooperation-study.html |archivedate=16 November 2023 |accessdate=17 November 2023 }}</ref><ref name="SCI-20231116">{{cite journal |author=Samuni, Liran |display-authors=et al. |title=Cooperation across social borders in bonobos
|url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg0844 |date=16 November 2023 |journal=] |volume=382 |issue=6672 |pages=805–809 |doi=10.1126/science.adg0844 |pmid=37972165 |bibcode=2023Sci...382..805S |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20231117125744/https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg0844 |archivedate=17 November 2023 |accessdate=17 November 2023 }}</ref>

=== Diet ===

Apart from humans and gorillas, apes eat a predominantly ] diet, mostly fruit, but supplemented with a variety of other foods. Gorillas are predominantly ], eating mostly stalks, shoots, roots and leaves with some fruit and other foods. Non-human apes usually eat a small amount of raw animal foods such as insects or eggs. In the case of humans, migration and the invention of hunting tools and cooking has led to an even wider variety of foods and diets, with many human diets including large amounts of cooked ]s (]s) or ]s.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23230980-600-every-human-culture-includes-cooking-this-is-how-it-began |title=Every human culture includes cooking – this is how it began |first=G. |last=Lawton |date=2 November 2016 |website=] |access-date=27 August 2021 |archive-date=29 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210729081037/https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23230980-600-every-human-culture-includes-cooking-this-is-how-it-began/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Other food production and processing methods including animal husbandry and industrial refining and processing have further changed human diets.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nature.com/news/humans-are-becoming-more-carnivorous-1.14282 |title=Humans are becoming more carnivorous |last=Hoag |first=Hannah |date=2 December 2013 |journal=] |doi=10.1038/nature.2013.14282 |s2cid=183143537 |access-date=26 November 2014 |archive-date=29 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129232443/http://www.nature.com/news/humans-are-becoming-more-carnivorous-1.14282 |url-status=live }}</ref> Humans and other apes occasionally eat other primates.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14926-loving-bonobos-have-a-carnivorous-dark-side.html#.VHXsaclWqUU |title=Loving bonobos have a carnivorous dark side |last=Callaway |first=E. |date=13 October 2006 |work=] |access-date=26 November 2014 |archive-date=29 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029130152/http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14926-loving-bonobos-have-a-carnivorous-dark-side.html#.VHXsaclWqUU |url-status=live }}</ref> Some of these primates are now close to extinction with habitat loss being the underlying cause.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150728-chimps-nearly-wiped-out-monkeys |title=Chimpanzees over-hunt monkey prey almost to extinction |first=Michael |last=M. |publisher=] |access-date=28 May 2018 |archive-date=6 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180606155344/http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150728-chimps-nearly-wiped-out-monkeys |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080804222912.htm |title=Extinction threat to monkeys and other primates due to habitat loss, hunting |website=] |access-date=28 May 2018 |archive-date=28 May 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180528134736/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080804222912.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>

=== Cognition ===
]

All the non-human hominoids are generally thought of as highly intelligent, and scientific study has broadly confirmed that they perform very well on a wide range of cognitive tests—though there is relatively little data on gibbon cognition. The early studies by ] demonstrated exceptional ] abilities in chimpanzees, which Köhler attributed to ]. The ] has been repeatedly demonstrated; more recently, the manufacture of tools has been documented, both in the wild and in laboratory tests. ] is much more easily demonstrated in "great apes" than in other primate species. Almost all the studies in ] have been done with "great apes", and though there is continuing dispute as to whether they demonstrate real language abilities, there is no doubt that they involve significant feats of learning. Chimpanzees in different parts of Africa have developed tools that are used in food acquisition, demonstrating a form of ].<ref>{{cite book |first=W. |last=McGrew |title=Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution |year=1992}}</ref>

== Threats and conservation ==
All non-human hominoids are rare and threatened with ]ion. The ] is the least threatened, only being ] to extinction. Five gibbon species are ], as are all species of orangutan and gorilla. The remaining species of gibbon, the bonobo, and all four subspecies of chimpanzees are ]. The chief threat to most of the endangered species is loss of tropical ] habitat, though some populations are further imperiled by hunting for ]. The great apes of Africa are also facing threat from the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Rush |first=J. |date=23 January 2015 |title=Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150330035716/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |archive-date=30 March 2015 |access-date=26 March 2015 |work=The Independent}}</ref> Currently considered to be the greatest threat to survival of African apes, ] infection is responsible for the death of at least one third of all gorillas and chimpanzees since 1990.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |title=Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn |last=Rush |first=J. |date=23 January 2015 |work=The Independent |access-date=26 March 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150330035716/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/ebola-virus-has-killed-a-third-of-the-worlds-gorillas-and-chimpanzees--and-could-pose-greatest-threat-to-their-survival-conservationists-warn-9998386.html |archive-date=30 March 2015 |url-status=dead}}</ref>

All the species of ] in Africa, are considered endangered. Hunting, logging, agricultural expansion and mining are among the main threats. Recently mining has expanded due to the ]. According to researchers "This means that current climate solutions could lead to more industrialization in these places, which could worsen the climate crisis". The ] was created for solve problems like this.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Threat of mining to African great apes |journal=Science Advances |date=3 April 2024 |volume=10 |issue=14 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.adl0335 |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adl0335 |access-date=19 September 2024 |last1=Junker |first1=Jessica |last2=Quoss |first2=Luise |last3=Valdez |first3=Jose |last4=Arandjelovic |first4=Mimi |last5=Barrie |first5=Abdulai |last6=Campbell |first6=Geneviève |last7=Heinicke |first7=Stefanie |last8=Humle |first8=Tatyana |last9=Kouakou |first9=Célestin Y. |last10=Kühl |first10=Hjalmar S. |last11=Ordaz-Németh |first11=Isabel |last12=Pereira |first12=Henrique M. |last13=Rainer |first13=Helga |last14=Refisch |first14=Johannes |last15=Sonter |first15=Laura |last16=Sop |first16=Tenekwetche |pmid=38569032 |bibcode=2024SciA...10L.335J }}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==
* {{Portal inline|Mammals}}
* ]
* '']'' (2015 PBS film)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] (for notable non-fictional non-human apes)
* ]
* ]
* ] from the ]
{{Clear}}

==Notes==
{{noteslist}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}}
<references/>

===Literature cited===
{{refbegin}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dawkins |first=R. |year=2005 |title=The Ancestor's Tale |edition=p/b |location=London |publisher=Phoenix (Orion Books) |isbn=978-0-7538-1996-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dixson |first=A. F. |year=1981 |title=The Natural History of the Gorilla |location=London |publisher=Weidenfeld & Nicolson |isbn=978-0-297-77895-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mishler |first=Brent D |year=2009 |editor-last=Ayala |editor-first=F. J. |editor2-last=Arp |editor2-first=R. |contribution=Species are not uniquely real biological entities |title=Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology |pages=110–122 |isbn=978-1-4443-1492-2 |doi=10.1002/9781444314922.ch6 |name-list-style=amp}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Stace |first=C. A. |author-link=Clive A. Stace |year=2010 |title=Classification by molecules: what's in it for field botanists? |journal=Watsonia |volume=28 |pages=103–122 |url=http://www.watsonia.org.uk/Wats28p103.pdf |access-date=7 February 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726104027/https://www.watsonia.org.uk/Wats28p103.pdf |archive-date=26 July 2011}}
* {{cite book |last=Terry |first=M. W. |chapter=Use of common and scientific nomenclature to designate laboratory primates |editor-first=A. M. |editor-last=Schrier |title=Behavioral Primatology: Advances in Research and Theory |volume=1 |location=Hillsdale, N.J., US |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum |year=1977}}
{{refend}}


==External links == ==External links==
{{Sister project links}}
{{sisterlinks|Ape}}
{{Wikispecies|Hominoidea|Ape}} * {{Wikispecies-inline|Hominoidea}}
{{Wikibookspar|Dichotomous Key|Hominoidea}} * {{Wikibooks-inline|Dichotomous Key|Hominoidea}}
* {{cite journal |author=Pilbeam D. |author-link=David Pilbeam |title=Hominoid systematics: The soft evidence |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=97 |issue=20 |pages=10684–6 |date=September 2000 |pmid=10995486 |pmc=34045 |doi=10.1073/pnas.210390497 |bibcode=2000PNAS...9710684P |doi-access=free }} Agreement between cladograms based on molecular and anatomical data.
* at the ]
* – ], ] (August 2016).
*{{1911}}


] {{Apes}}
{{Notable apes}}
{{Primates}}
{{Haplorhini|Ho.}}
{{Taxonbar|from=Q102470}}
{{Authority control}}


] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 06:07, 14 December 2024

Branch of primates "Hominoid" redirects here. Not to be confused with Hominid. This article is about the branch of primates. For other uses, see Ape (disambiguation).

Hominoids
Apes
Temporal range: Miocene-Holocene
Male chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Parvorder: Catarrhini
Superfamily: Hominoidea
Gray, 1825
Type species
Homo sapiens
Linnaeus, 1758
Families

Apes (collectively Hominoidea /hɒmɪˈnɔɪdi.ə/) are a clade of Old World simians native to sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia (though they were more widespread in Africa, most of Asia, and Europe in prehistory, and counting humans are found globally). Apes are more closely related to Old World monkeys (family Cercopithecidae) than to the New World monkeys (Platyrrhini) with both Old World monkeys and apes placed in the clade Catarrhini. Apes do not have tails due to a mutation of the TBXT gene. In traditional and non-scientific use, the term ape can include tailless primates taxonomically considered Cercopithecidae (such as the Barbary ape and black ape), and is thus not equivalent to the scientific taxon Hominoidea. There are two extant branches of the superfamily Hominoidea: the gibbons, or lesser apes; and the hominids, or great apes.

  • The family Hylobatidae, the lesser apes, include four genera and a total of 20 species of gibbon, including the lar gibbon and the siamang, all native to Asia. They are highly arboreal and bipedal on the ground. They have lighter bodies and smaller social groups than great apes.
  • The family Hominidae (hominids), the great apes, include four genera comprising three extant species of orangutans and their subspecies, two extant species of gorillas and their subspecies, two extant species of chimpanzees and their subspecies, and humans in a single extant subspecies.

Except for gorillas and humans, hominoids are agile climbers of trees. Apes eat a variety of plant and animal foods, with the majority of food being plant foods, which can include fruits, leaves, stalks, roots and seeds, including nuts and grass seeds. Human diets are sometimes substantially different from that of other hominoids due in part to the development of technology and a wide range of habitation.

All non-human hominoids are rare and threatened with extinction. The main threat is habitat loss, though some populations are further imperiled by hunting. The great apes of Africa are also facing threat from the Ebola virus.

Name and terminology

Hominin timeline
This box:
−10 —–−9 —–−8 —–−7 —–−6 —–−5 —–−4 —–−3 —–−2 —–−1 —–0 —MiocenePliocenePleistoceneHomininiNakalipithecusSamburupithecusOuranopithecus
(Ou. turkae)
(Ou. macedoniensis)ChororapithecusOreopithecusSivapithecusSahelanthropusGraecopithecusOrrorin(O. praegens)
(O. tugenensis)Ardipithecus(Ar. kadabba)(Ar. ramidus)Australopithecus
(Au. africanus)
(Au. afarensis)
(Au. anamensis)H. habilis
(H. rudolfensis)
(Au. garhi)H. erectus
(H. antecessor)
(H. ergaster)
(Au. sediba)H. heidelbergensisHomo sapiensNeanderthalsDenisovans 
Earlier apes
Gorilla split
Chimpanzee split
Earliest bipedal
Earliest sign of Ardipithecus
Earliest sign of Australopithecus
Earliest stone tools
Earliest sign of
Homo
Dispersal beyond Africa
Earliest language
Earliest fire / cooking
Earliest rock art
Earliest clothes
Modern humans
H o m i n i d sP a r a n t h r o p u s
(million years ago)

"Ape", from Old English apa, is a word of uncertain origin. The term has a history of rather imprecise usage—and of comedic or punning usage in the vernacular. Its earliest meaning was generally of any non-human anthropoid primate, as is still the case for its cognates in other Germanic languages. Later, after the term "monkey" had been introduced into English, "ape" was specialized to refer to a tailless (therefore exceptionally human-like) primate. Thus, the term "ape" obtained two different meanings, as shown in the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica entry: it could be used as a synonym for "monkey" and it could denote the tailless human-like primate in particular.

Some, or recently all, hominoids are also called "apes", but the term is used broadly and has several different senses within both popular and scientific settings. "Ape" has been used as a synonym for "monkey" or for naming any primate with a human-like appearance, particularly those without a tail. Biologists have traditionally used the term "ape" to mean a member of the superfamily Hominoidea other than humans, but more recently to mean all members of Hominoidea. So "ape"—not to be confused with "great ape"—now becomes another word for hominoid including humans.

The taxonomic term hominoid is derived from, and intended as encompassing, the hominids, the family of great apes. Both terms were introduced by Gray (1825). The term hominins is also due to Gray (1824), intended as including the human lineage (see also Hominidae#Terminology, Human taxonomy).

The distinction between apes and monkeys is complicated by the traditional paraphyly of monkeys: Apes emerged as a sister group of Old World Monkeys in the catarrhines, which are a sister group of New World Monkeys. Therefore, cladistically, apes, catarrhines and related contemporary extinct groups such as Parapithecidae are monkeys as well, for any consistent definition of "monkey". "Old World monkey" may also legitimately be taken to be meant to include all the catarrhines, including apes and extinct species such as Aegyptopithecus, in which case the apes, Cercopithecoidea and Aegyptopithecus emerged within the Old World monkeys.

The primates called "apes" today became known to Europeans after the 18th century. As zoological knowledge developed, it became clear that taillessness occurred in a number of different and otherwise distantly related species. Sir Wilfrid Le Gros Clark was one of those primatologists who developed the idea that there were trends in primate evolution and that the extant members of the order could be arranged in an "ascending series", leading from "monkeys" to "apes" to humans. Within this tradition "ape" came to refer to all members of the superfamily Hominoidea except humans. As such, this use of "apes" represented a paraphyletic grouping, meaning that, even though all species of apes were descended from a common ancestor, this grouping did not include all the descendant species, because humans were excluded from being among the apes.

Traditionally, the English-language vernacular name "apes" does not include humans, but phylogenetically, humans (Homo) form part of the family Hominidae within Hominoidea. Thus, there are at least three common, or traditional, uses of the term "ape": non-specialists may not distinguish between "monkeys" and "apes", that is, they may use the two terms interchangeably; or they may use "ape" for any tailless monkey or non-human hominoid; or they may use the term "ape" to just mean the non-human hominoids.

Modern taxonomy aims for the use of monophyletic groups for taxonomic classification; Some literature may now use the common name "ape" to mean all members of the superfamily Hominoidea, including humans. For example, in his 2005 book, Benton wrote "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orang-utan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans". Modern biologists and primatologists refer to apes that are not human as "non-human" apes. Scientists broadly, other than paleoanthropologists, may use the term "hominin" to identify the human clade, replacing the term "hominid". See terminology of primate names.

See below, History of hominoid taxonomy, for a discussion of changes in scientific classification and terminology regarding hominoids.

Evolution

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Although the hominoid fossil record is still incomplete and fragmentary, there is now enough evidence to provide an outline of the evolutionary history of humans. Previously, the divergence between humans and other extant hominoids was thought to have occurred 15 to 20 million years ago, and several species of that time period, such as Ramapithecus, were once thought to be hominins and possible ancestors of humans. But, later fossil finds indicated that Ramapithecus was more closely related to the orangutan; and new biochemical evidence indicates that the last common ancestor of humans and non-hominins (that is, the chimpanzees) occurred between 5 and 10 million years ago, and probably nearer the lower end of that range (more recent); see Chimpanzee–human last common ancestor (CHLCA).

Taxonomic classification and phylogeny

Main article: List of hominoids

Genetic analysis combined with fossil evidence indicates that hominoids diverged from the Old World monkeys about 25 million years ago (mya), near the Oligocene–Miocene boundary. The gibbons split from the rest about 18 mya, and the hominid splits happened 14 mya (Pongo), 7 mya (Gorilla), and 3–5 mya (Homo & Pan). In 2015, a new genus and species were described, Pliobates cataloniae, which lived 11.6 mya, and appears to predate the split between Hominidae and Hylobatidae.

Crown Catharrhini (31)
(29)

Saadanioidea (†28)

Cercopithecoidea (24)

Victoriapithecinae (†19)

Crown Cercopithecoidea

Hominoidea (30)

Dendropithecidae (†7 Mya)

Ekembo heseloni (†17 Mya)

Proconsulidae (†18 Mya)

Ekembo nyanzae (†17 Mya)

(29)

Equatorius (†16)

Pliobates (†11.6 Mya)

(29)
Afropithecidae (28)

Morotopithecus (†20)

Afropithecus (†16)

Crown Hominoidea (22)

Hominidae

Hylobatidae

Catarrhini (31.0 Mya)
Hominoidea/apes (20.4 Mya)
Hominidae/great apes (15.7 Mya)
Homininae (8.8 Mya)
Hominini (6.3 Mya)

humans (genus Homo)

chimpanzees (genus Pan)

gorillas (genus Gorilla)

orangutans (genus Pongo)

gibbons/lesser apes (family Hylobatidae)




Traditional apes

Cercopithecoidea  Old World monkeys

Skeletons of members of the ape superfamily, Hominoidea. There are two extant families: Hominidae, the "great apes"; and Hylobatidae, the gibbons, or "lesser apes".
From left: Comparison of size of gibbon, human, chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan. Non-human hominoids do not stand upright as their normal posture.

The families, and extant genera and species of hominoids are:

History of hominoid taxonomy

Further information: Human taxonomy § History

The history of hominoid taxonomy is complex and somewhat confusing. Recent evidence has changed our understanding of the relationships between the hominoids, especially regarding the human lineage; and the traditionally used terms have become somewhat confused. Competing approaches to methodology and terminology are found among current scientific sources. Over time, authorities have changed the names and the meanings of names of groups and subgroups as new evidence — that is, new discoveries of fossils and tools and of observations in the field, plus continual comparisons of anatomy and DNA sequences — has changed the understanding of relationships between hominoids. There has been a gradual demotion of humans from being 'special' in the taxonomy to being one branch among many. This recent turmoil (of history) illustrates the growing influence on all taxonomy of cladistics, the science of classifying living things strictly according to their lines of descent.

Today, there are eight extant genera of hominoids. They are the four genera in the family Hominidae, namely Homo, Pan, Gorilla, and Pongo; plus four genera in the family Hylobatidae (gibbons): Hylobates, Hoolock, Nomascus and Symphalangus. (The two subspecies of hoolock gibbons were recently moved from the genus Bunopithecus to the new genus Hoolock and re-ranked as species; a third species was described in January 2017).

In 1758, Carl Linnaeus, relying on second- or third-hand accounts, placed a second species in Homo along with H. sapiens: Homo troglodytes ("cave-dwelling man"). Although the term "Orang Outang" is listed as a variety – Homo sylvestris – under this species, it is nevertheless not clear to which animal this name refers, as Linnaeus had no specimen to refer to, hence no precise description. Linnaeus may have based Homo troglodytes on reports of mythical creatures, then-unidentified simians, or Asian natives dressed in animal skins. Linnaeus named the orangutan Simia satyrus ("satyr monkey"). He placed the three genera Homo, Simia and Lemur in the order of Primates.

The troglodytes name was used for the chimpanzee by Blumenbach in 1775, but moved to the genus Simia. The orangutan was moved to the genus Pongo in 1799 by Lacépède.

Linnaeus's inclusion of humans in the primates with monkeys and apes was troubling for people who denied a close relationship between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom. Linnaeus's Lutheran archbishop had accused him of "impiety". In a letter to Johann Georg Gmelin dated 25 February 1747, Linnaeus wrote:

It is not pleasing to me that I must place humans among the primates, but man is intimately familiar with himself. Let's not quibble over words. It will be the same to me whatever name is applied. But I desperately seek from you and from the whole world a general difference between men and simians from the principles of Natural History. I certainly know of none. If only someone might tell me one! If I called man a simian or vice versa I would bring together all the theologians against me. Perhaps I ought to, in accordance with the law of Natural History.

Accordingly, Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in the first edition of his Manual of Natural History (1779), proposed that the primates be divided into the Quadrumana (four-handed, i.e. apes and monkeys) and Bimana (two-handed, i.e. humans). This distinction was taken up by other naturalists, most notably Georges Cuvier. Some elevated the distinction to the level of order.

However, the many affinities between humans and other primates – and especially the "great apes" – made it clear that the distinction made no scientific sense. In his 1871 book The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Charles Darwin wrote:

The greater number of naturalists who have taken into consideration the whole structure of man, including his mental faculties, have followed Blumenbach and Cuvier, and have placed man in a separate Order, under the title of the Bimana, and therefore on an equality with the orders of the Quadrumana, Carnivora, etc. Recently many of our best naturalists have recurred to the view first propounded by Linnaeus, so remarkable for his sagacity, and have placed man in the same Order with the Quadrumana, under the title of the Primates. The justice of this conclusion will be admitted: for in the first place, we must bear in mind the comparative insignificance for classification of the great development of the brain in man, and that the strongly marked differences between the skulls of man and the Quadrumana (lately insisted upon by Bischoff, Aeby, and others) apparently follow from their differently developed brains. In the second place, we must remember that nearly all the other and more important differences between man and the Quadrumana are manifestly adaptive in their nature, and relate chiefly to the erect position of man; such as the structure of his hand, foot, and pelvis, the curvature of his spine, and the position of his head.

Changes in taxonomy and terminology

See also: Hominidae and Human taxonomy
Humans the non-apes: Until about 1960, taxonomists typically divided the superfamily Hominoidea into two families. The science community treated humans and their extinct relatives as the outgroup within the superfamily; that is, humans were considered as quite distant from kinship with the "apes". Humans were classified as the family Hominidae and were known as the "hominids". All other hominoids were known as "apes" and were referred to the family Pongidae.
The "great apes" in Pongidae: The 1960s saw the methodologies of molecular biology applied to primate taxonomy. Goodman's 1964 immunological study of serum proteins led to re-classifying the hominoids into three families: the humans in Hominidae; the great apes in Pongidae; and the "lesser apes" (gibbons) in Hylobatidae. However, this arrangement had two trichotomies: Pan, Gorilla, and Pongo of the "great apes" in Pongidae, and Hominidae, Pongidae, and Hylobatidae in Hominoidea. These presented a puzzle; scientists wanted to know which genus speciated first from the common hominoid ancestor.
Gibbons the outgroup: New studies indicated that gibbons, not humans, are the outgroup within the superfamily Hominoidea, meaning: the rest of the hominoids are more closely related to each other than (any of them) are to the gibbons. With this splitting, the gibbons (Hylobates, et al.) were isolated after moving the great apes into the same family as humans. Now the term "hominid" encompassed a larger collective taxa within the family Hominidae. With the family trichotomy settled, scientists could now work to learn which genus is 'least' related to the others in the subfamily Ponginae.
Orangutans the outgroup: Investigations comparing humans and the three other hominid genera disclosed that the African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas) and humans are more closely related to each other than any of them are to the Asian orangutans (Pongo); that is, the orangutans, not humans, are the outgroup within the family Hominidae. This led to reassigning the African apes to the subfamily Homininae with humans—which presented a new three-way split: Homo, Pan, and Gorilla.
Hominins: In an effort to resolve the trichotomy, while preserving the nostalgic "outgroup" status of humans, the subfamily Homininae was divided into two tribes: Gorillini, comprising genus Pan and genus Gorilla; and Hominini, comprising genus Homo (the humans). Humans and close relatives now began to be known as "hominins", that is, of the tribe Hominini. Thus, the term "hominin" succeeded to the previous use of "hominid", which meaning had changed with changes in Hominidae (see above: 3rd graphic, "Gibbons the outgroup").
Gorillas the outgroup: New DNA comparisons now provided evidence that gorillas, not humans, are the outgroup in the subfamily Homininae; this suggested that chimpanzees should be grouped with humans in the tribe Hominini, but in separate subtribes. Now the name "hominin" delineated Homo plus those earliest Homo relatives and ancestors that arose after the divergence from the chimpanzees. (Humans are no longer recognized as an outgroup, but are a branch, deep in the tree of the pre-1960s ape group).
Speciation of gibbons: Later DNA comparisons disclosed previously unknown speciation of genus Hylobates (gibbons) into four genera: Hylobates, Hoolock, Nomascus, and Symphalangus. The ordering of speciation of these four genera are being investigated as of 2022.

Characteristics

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Like those of the orangutan, the shoulder joints of hominoids are adapted to brachiation, or movement by swinging in tree branches.

The lesser apes are the gibbon family, Hylobatidae, of sixteen species; all are native to Asia. Their major differentiating characteristic is their long arms, which they use to brachiate through trees. Their wrists are ball and socket joints as an evolutionary adaptation to their arboreal lifestyle. Generally smaller than the African apes, the largest gibbon, the siamang, weighs up to 14 kg (31 lb); in comparison, the smallest "great ape", the bonobo, is 34 to 60 kg (75 to 132 lb).

The superfamily Hominoidea falls within the parvorder Catarrhini, which also includes the Old World monkeys of Africa and Eurasia. Within this grouping, the two families Hylobatidae and Hominidae can be distinguished from Old World monkeys by the number of cusps on their molars; hominoids have five in the "Y-5" molar pattern, whereas Old World monkeys have only four in a bilophodont pattern.

Further, in comparison with Old World monkeys, hominoids are noted for: more mobile shoulder joints and arms due to the dorsal position of the scapula; broader ribcages that are flatter front-to-back; and a shorter, less mobile spine, with greatly reduced caudal (tail) vertebrae—resulting in complete loss of the tail in extant hominoid species. These are anatomical adaptations, first, to vertical hanging and swinging locomotion (brachiation) and, later, to developing balance in a bipedal pose. Note there are primates in other families that also lack tails, and at least one, the pig-tailed langur, is known to walk significant distances bipedally. The front of the ape skull is characterised by its sinuses, fusion of the frontal bone, and by post-orbital constriction.

Distinction from monkeys

See also: Monkey § Historical and modern terminology

Cladistically, apes, catarrhines, and extinct species such as Aegyptopithecus and Parapithecidaea, are monkeys, so one can only specify ape features not present in other monkeys.

Unlike most monkeys, apes do not possess a tail. Monkeys are more likely to be in trees and use their tails for balance. While the great apes are considerably larger than monkeys, gibbons (lesser apes) are smaller than some monkeys. Apes are considered to be more intelligent than monkeys, which are considered to have more primitive brains.

The enzyme urate oxidase has become inactive in all apes, its function having been lost in two primate lineages during the middle Miocene; first in the common ancestors of Hominidae, and later in the common ancestor of Hylobatidae. It has been hypothesized that in both incidents it was a mutation that occurred in apes living in Europe when the climate was getting colder, leading to starvation during winter. The mutation changed the biochemistry of the apes and made it easier to accumulate fat, which allowed the animals to survive longer periods of starvation. When they migrated to Asia and Africa, this genetic trait remained.

Behaviour

Major studies of behaviour in the field were completed on the three better-known "great apes", for example by Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Birutė Galdikas. These studies have shown that in their natural environments, the non-human hominoids show sharply varying social structure: gibbons are monogamous, territorial pair-bonders, orangutans are solitary, gorillas live in small troops with a single adult male leader, while chimpanzees live in larger troops with bonobos exhibiting promiscuous sexual behaviour. Their diets also vary; gorillas are foliovores, while the others are all primarily frugivores, although the common chimpanzee hunts for meat. Foraging behaviour is correspondingly variable.

In November 2023, scientists reported, for the first time, evidence that groups of primates, including apes, and, particularly bonobos, are capable of cooperating with each other.

Diet

Apart from humans and gorillas, apes eat a predominantly frugivorous diet, mostly fruit, but supplemented with a variety of other foods. Gorillas are predominantly folivorous, eating mostly stalks, shoots, roots and leaves with some fruit and other foods. Non-human apes usually eat a small amount of raw animal foods such as insects or eggs. In the case of humans, migration and the invention of hunting tools and cooking has led to an even wider variety of foods and diets, with many human diets including large amounts of cooked tubers (roots) or legumes. Other food production and processing methods including animal husbandry and industrial refining and processing have further changed human diets. Humans and other apes occasionally eat other primates. Some of these primates are now close to extinction with habitat loss being the underlying cause.

Cognition

This series of images shows a gorilla using a small tree trunk as a tool. The trunk is used to maintain balance while fishing for aquatic plants

All the non-human hominoids are generally thought of as highly intelligent, and scientific study has broadly confirmed that they perform very well on a wide range of cognitive tests—though there is relatively little data on gibbon cognition. The early studies by Wolfgang Köhler demonstrated exceptional problem-solving abilities in chimpanzees, which Köhler attributed to insight. The use of tools has been repeatedly demonstrated; more recently, the manufacture of tools has been documented, both in the wild and in laboratory tests. Imitation is much more easily demonstrated in "great apes" than in other primate species. Almost all the studies in animal language acquisition have been done with "great apes", and though there is continuing dispute as to whether they demonstrate real language abilities, there is no doubt that they involve significant feats of learning. Chimpanzees in different parts of Africa have developed tools that are used in food acquisition, demonstrating a form of animal culture.

Threats and conservation

All non-human hominoids are rare and threatened with extinction. The eastern hoolock gibbon is the least threatened, only being vulnerable to extinction. Five gibbon species are critically endangered, as are all species of orangutan and gorilla. The remaining species of gibbon, the bonobo, and all four subspecies of chimpanzees are endangered. The chief threat to most of the endangered species is loss of tropical rainforest habitat, though some populations are further imperiled by hunting for bushmeat. The great apes of Africa are also facing threat from the Ebola virus. Currently considered to be the greatest threat to survival of African apes, Ebola infection is responsible for the death of at least one third of all gorillas and chimpanzees since 1990.

All the species of great apes in Africa, are considered endangered. Hunting, logging, agricultural expansion and mining are among the main threats. Recently mining has expanded due to the energy transition. According to researchers "This means that current climate solutions could lead to more industrialization in these places, which could worsen the climate crisis". The Sustainable Critical Minerals Alliance was created for solve problems like this.

See also

Notes

  1. Although Dawkins is clear that he uses "apes" for Hominoidea, he also uses "great apes" in ways which exclude humans. Thus in Dawkins 2005: "Long before people thought in terms of evolution ... great apes were often confused with humans" (p. 114); "gibbons are faithfully monogamous, unlike the great apes which are our closer relatives" (p. 126).
  2. The hypothetical Proto-Germanic form is given as *apōn (F. Kluge, Etymologisches Wörterbuch der Deutschen Sprache (2002), online version, s.v. "Affe"; V. Orel, A handbook of Germanic etymology (2003), s.v. "*apōn" or as *apa(n) (Online Etymology Dictionary (2001–2014), s.v. "ape"; M. Philippa, F. Debrabandere, A. Quak, T. Schoonheim & N. van der Sijs, Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands (2003–2009), s.v. "aap"). Perhaps ultimately derived from a non-Indo-European language, the word might be a direct borrowing from Celtic, or perhaps from Slavic, although in both cases it is also argued that the borrowing, if it took place, went in the opposite direction.
  3. "Any simian known on the Mediterranean during the Middle Ages; monkey or ape"; cf. ape-ward: "a juggler who keeps a trained monkey for the amusement of the crowd." (Middle English Dictionary, s.v. "ape").
  4. Dawkins 2005; for example "ll apes except humans are hairy" (p. 99), "mong the apes, gibbons are second only to humans" (p. 126).
  5. Definitions of paraphyly vary; for the one used here see e.g. Stace 2010, pp. 106
  6. Definitions of monophyly vary; for the one used here see e.g. Mishler 2009, pp. 114

References

  1. Gray, J. E. "An outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into tribes and families, with a list of the genera apparently appertaining to each tribe". Annals of Philosophy. New Series. 10: 337–344. Archived from the original on 27 April 2022. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
  2. Xia, Bo; Zhang, Weimin; Wudzinska, Aleksandra; Huang, Emily; Brosh, Ran; Pour, Maayan; Miller, Alexander; Dasen, Jeremy S.; Maurano, Matthew T.; Kim, Sang Y.; Boeke, Jef D. (16 September 2021). "The genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes". bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.09.14.460388.
  3. Weisberger, Mindy (23 March 2024). "Why don't humans have tails? Scientists find answers in an unlikely place". CNN. Archived from the original on 24 March 2024. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  4. ^ Dixson 1981, pp. 13.
  5. Grehan, J. R. (2006). "Mona Lisa smile: the morphological enigma of human and great ape evolution". Anatomical Record. 289B (4): 139–157. doi:10.1002/ar.b.20107. PMID 16865704.
  6. ^ Benton, M. J. (2005). Vertebrate Palaeontology. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-632-05637-8. Archived from the original on 3 April 2023. Retrieved 10 July 2011., p. 371
  7. Rush, J. (23 January 2015). "Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn". The Independent. Archived from the original on 30 March 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  8. Terry 1977, pp. 3.
  9. Terry 1977, pp. 3–4.
  10. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Ape" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 2 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 160.
  11. Gray, JE. "An outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into tribes and families, with a list of the genera apparently appertaining to each tribe". Annals of Philosophy. New Series. 10: 337–344. Archived from the original on 27 April 2022. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
  12. Osman Hill, W. C. (1953). Primates Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy I—Strepsirhini. Edinburgh Univ Pubs Science & Maths, No 3. Edinburgh University Press. p. 53. OCLC 500576914.
  13. Martin, W. C. L. (1841). A General Introduction to the Natural History of Mammiferous Animals, With a Particular View of the Physical History of man, and the More Closely Allied Genera of the Order Quadrumana, or Monkeys. London: Wright and Co. printers. pp. 340, 361.
  14. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, M. É. (1812). "Tableau des quadrumanes, ou des animaux composant le premier ordre de la classe des Mammifères". Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle. 19. Paris: 85–122. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  15. Bugge, J. (1974). "Chapter 4". Cells Tissues Organs. 87 (Suppl. 62): 32–43. doi:10.1159/000144209. ISSN 1422-6405.
  16. Springer; D. H. (1 July 2011). An Introduction to Zoology: Investigating the Animal World. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 536. ISBN 978-0-7637-5286-6. Through careful study taxonomists today struggle to eliminate polyphyletic and paraphyletic groups and taxons, reclassifying their members into appropriate monophyletic taxa
  17. "Fossils may pinpoint critical split between apes and monkeys". 15 May 2013. Archived from the original on 16 December 2022. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  18. Rossie, J. B.; Hill, A. (2018). "A new species of Simiolus from the middle Miocene of the Tugen Hills, Kenya". Journal of Human Evolution. 125: 50–58. Bibcode:2018JHumE.125...50R. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.09.002. PMID 30502897. S2CID 54625375.
  19. Rasmussen, D. T.; Friscia, A. R.; Gutierrez, M.; et al. (2019). "Primitive Old World monkey from the earliest Miocene of Kenya and the evolution of cercopithecoid bilophodonty". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (13): 6051–6056. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116.6051R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1815423116. PMC 6442627. PMID 30858323.
  20. Alba, D. M.; Fortuny, J.; Moyà-Solà, S. (2010). "Enamel thickness in the Middle Miocene great apes Anoiapithecus, Pierolapithecus and Dryopithecus". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 277 (1691): 2237–2245. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0218. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 2880156. PMID 20335211.
  21. Grabowski, M.; Jungers, W. L. (2017). "Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 880. Bibcode:2017NatCo...8..880G. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00997-4. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 5638852. PMID 29026075.
  22. "A new primate species at the root of the tree of extant hominoids". 29 October 2015. Archived from the original on 29 October 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  23. Nengo, I.; Tafforeau, P.; Gilbert, C. C.; et al. (2017). "New infant cranium from the African Miocene sheds light on ape evolution" (PDF). Nature. 548 (7666): 169–174. Bibcode:2017Natur.548..169N. doi:10.1038/nature23456. PMID 28796200. S2CID 4397839. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  24. Dixson 1981, p. 16.
  25. ^ Groves, C. P. (2005). Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M. (eds.). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 178–184. ISBN 0-801-88221-4. OCLC 62265494.
  26. Cochrane, J. (2 November 2017). "New Orangutan Species Could Be the Most Endangered Great Ape". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 April 2018. Retrieved 3 November 2017.
  27. ^ Wilson, Don E.; Cavallini, Paolo (2013). Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN 978-84-96553-89-7. OCLC 1222638259.
  28. ^ Mootnick, A.; Groves, C. P. (2005). "A new generic name for the hoolock gibbon (Hylobatidae)". International Journal of Primatology. 26 (4): 971–976. doi:10.1007/s10764-005-5332-4. S2CID 8394136.
  29. Frängsmyr, T.; Lindroth, S.; Eriksson, G.; Broberg, G. (1983). Linnaeus, the man and his work. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-7112-1841-3., p. 166
  30. "Letter, Carl Linnaeus to Johann Georg Gmelin. Uppsala, Sweden, 25 February 1747". Swedish Linnaean Society. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 4 February 2009.
  31. Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man. Barnes & Noble. ISBN 978-0-7607-7814-2.
  32. G. G., Simpson (1945). "The principles of classification and a classification of mammals". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 85: 1–350.
  33. Goodman, M. (1964). "Man's place in the phylogeny of the primates as reflected in serum proteins". In Washburn, S. L. (ed.). Classification and Human Evolution. Chicago: Aldine. pp. 204–234.
  34. Goodman, M. (1974). "Biochemical evidence on hominid phylogeny". Annual Review of Anthropology. 3 (1): 203–228. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.001223.
  35. Goodman, M.; Tagle, D. A.; Fitch, D. H.; et al. (1990). "Primate evolution at the DNA level and a classification of hominoids". Journal of Molecular Evolution. 30 (3): 260–266. Bibcode:1990JMolE..30..260G. doi:10.1007/BF02099995. PMID 2109087. S2CID 2112935.
  36. Call, J.; Tomasello, M. (2007). The Gestural Communication of Apes and Monkeys. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  37. Johnson, R. J.; Lanaspa, M. A.; Gaucher, E. A. (2011). "Uric acid: A Danger Signal from the RNA World that may have a role in the Epidemic of Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and CardioRenal Disease: Evolutionary Considerations". Seminars in Nephrology. 31 (5): 394–399. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2011.08.002. PMC 3203212. PMID 22000645.
  38. Johnson, Richard J.; Andrews, Peter (2015). "The Fat Gene". Scientific American. 313 (4): 64–69. Bibcode:2015SciAm.313d..64J. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1015-64.
  39. Zimmer, Carl (16 November 2023). "Scientists Find First Evidence That Groups of Apes Cooperate - Some bonobos are challenging the notion that humans are the only primates capable of group-to-group alliances". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 16 November 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2023.
  40. Samuni, Liran; et al. (16 November 2023). "Cooperation across social borders in bonobos". Science. 382 (6672): 805–809. Bibcode:2023Sci...382..805S. doi:10.1126/science.adg0844. PMID 37972165. Archived from the original on 17 November 2023. Retrieved 17 November 2023.
  41. Lawton, G. (2 November 2016). "Every human culture includes cooking – this is how it began". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 29 July 2021. Retrieved 27 August 2021.
  42. Hoag, Hannah (2 December 2013). "Humans are becoming more carnivorous". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.14282. S2CID 183143537. Archived from the original on 29 November 2014. Retrieved 26 November 2014.
  43. Callaway, E. (13 October 2006). "Loving bonobos have a carnivorous dark side". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 29 October 2014. Retrieved 26 November 2014.
  44. M., Michael. "Chimpanzees over-hunt monkey prey almost to extinction". BBC Earth. Archived from the original on 6 June 2018. Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  45. "Extinction threat to monkeys and other primates due to habitat loss, hunting". Science Daily. Archived from the original on 28 May 2018. Retrieved 28 May 2018.
  46. McGrew, W. (1992). Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution.
  47. Rush, J. (23 January 2015). "Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn". The Independent. Archived from the original on 30 March 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  48. Rush, J. (23 January 2015). "Ebola virus 'has killed a third of world's gorillas and chimpanzees' – and could pose greatest threat to their survival, conservationists warn". The Independent. Archived from the original on 30 March 2015. Retrieved 26 March 2015.
  49. Junker, Jessica; Quoss, Luise; Valdez, Jose; Arandjelovic, Mimi; Barrie, Abdulai; Campbell, Geneviève; Heinicke, Stefanie; Humle, Tatyana; Kouakou, Célestin Y.; Kühl, Hjalmar S.; Ordaz-Németh, Isabel; Pereira, Henrique M.; Rainer, Helga; Refisch, Johannes; Sonter, Laura; Sop, Tenekwetche (3 April 2024). "Threat of mining to African great apes". Science Advances. 10 (14). Bibcode:2024SciA...10L.335J. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adl0335. PMID 38569032. Retrieved 19 September 2024.

Literature cited

External links

Apes
Extant
ape species
Study of apes
Legal and
social status
Related
Notable non-human apes
Bonobos
Chimpanzees
Gorillas
Orangutans
Extant primate families
Strepsirrhini
Lorisoidea
Lemuroidea
Chiromyiformes
Haplorhini
Simian
Platyrrhini
Catharrhini
Hominoidea
Haplorhini
Haplorhini
"Omomyidae"
Microchoerinae
"Anaptomorphinae"
"Omomyinae"
Tarkadectinae
Tarsiiformes
Tarsiidae
Simiiformes
    • see below↓
Teilhardina sp.
Simiiformes
Simiiformes
Afrotarsiidae?
Eosimiidae
Amphipithecidae
Parapithecoidea
Proteopithecidae
Parapithecidae
Platyrrhini
Aotidae
Pitheciidae
Atelidae
Cebidae
Callitrichidae
Catarrhini
    • see below↓
Eosimias sinensis
Catarrhini
Catarrhini
Oligopithecidae
Propliopithecidae
Pliopithecoidea
Pliopithecidae
Dionysopithecidae
Crouzeliidae
Cercopithecoidea
Victoriapithecidae
Colobinae
Cercopithecinae
Cercopithecini
Papionini
Hominoidea
    • see below↓
Aegyptopithecus zeuxis
Hominoidea
Hominoidea
Dendropithecidae
Hylobatidae
Hominidae
Ponginae
Homininae
Dryopithecini
Gorillini
Hominini
Hominina
Gigantopithecus blacki
Taxon identifiers
Hominoidea
Categories: