Misplaced Pages

Fielding independent pitching: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 21 June 2006 editMack2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,439 edits External links← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:37, 28 October 2024 edit undoCitation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,406,218 edits Added date. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Pitching statistics | #UCB_Category 26/47 
(207 intermediate revisions by 87 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of baseball statistic}}
In ], '''Defense Independent Pitching Statistics (DIPS)''' are statistics which measure a pitcher's effectiveness based only on plays which do not involve fielders: ] allowed, ], ] and ]. Those plays are under only the pitcher's control in the sense that fielders have no effect on their outcome.
In ], '''fielding independent pitching''' ('''FIP''') (also referred to as '''defense independent pitching''' (DIP)) is intended to measure a ]'s effectiveness based only on statistics that do not involve ] (except the ]). These include ]s allowed, ]s, ], ], and, more recently, fly ball percentage, ground ball percentage, and (to a much lesser extent) line drive percentage. By focusing on these statistics and ignoring what happens once a ball is put in play, which – on most plays – the pitcher has little control over, DIP claims to offer a clearer picture of the pitcher's true ability.


The most controversial part of DIP is the idea that pitchers have little influence over what happens to balls that are put into play. Some people believe this has been well-established (see below), primarily by showing the large variability of most pitchers' ] from year to year. However, there is a wide variation in career BABIP among pitchers, and this seems to correlate with career success. For instance, no pitcher in the Hall of Fame has a below-average career BABIP.
There are several ] statistics that use only these "defense-independent" pitching statistics to evaluate a pitcher's ability. The logic behind using only these statistics is based on research suggesting that there is little to no difference in the abilities of Major League pitchers to influence the rate of hits against them on balls hit into the field of play. In other words, defense-independent statistics such as walks and strikeouts are determined almost entirely by the pitcher's ability level. But defense-dependent statistics, such as the rate of hits allowed on balls put into play (other than home runs), are almost entirely the result of luck and the skills of the defensive players on the field.


==Formulae==
]'s research was the earliest to detail and publicize these effects. Until his article in 2001, much of the baseball research community believed that individual pitchers had an inherent ability to prevent hits on balls in play. McCracken reasoned that if this ability existed, it would be noticeable in a pitcher's 'Batting Average on Balls In Play' (BABIP). His research found the opposite to be true: that while a pitcher's ability to cause strikeouts or allow home runs remained somewhat constant from season to season, his ability to prevent hits of balls in play did not.
Each of the following formulae uses ] (IP), a measure of the number of outs a team made while a pitcher was in the game.<ref>For an extended overview of the development of DIP and alternative formulas, see Dan Basco and Michael Davies, "The Many Flavors of DIPS: A History and an Overview," Society for American Baseball Research, ''Baseball Research Journal,'' . </ref> Since most outs rely on fielding, the results from calculations using IP are not truly independent of team defense. While the creators of DICE, FIP and similar statistics all suggest they are "defense independent", others have pointed out that their formulas involve (IP). IP is a statistical measure of how many outs were made while a pitcher was pitching. This includes those made by fielders who are typically involved in more than two thirds of the outs. These critics claim this makes pitchers' DICE or FIP highly dependent on the defensive play of their fielders.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://grannybaseball.blogspot.com/2010/06/fielding-independent-pitching-fip-isnt.html|title=Granny Baseball: Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) Isn't Fielding Independent|date=June 10, 2010}}</ref>


===DICE===
However another study, by Tom Tippett at Diamond Mind, while confirming many of McCracken's findings, concluded that the differences between pitchers in preventing hits on balls in play were at least partially the result of skill.]. Tippett analyzed certain groups of pitchers that appear to be able to reduce the number of hits allowed on balls hit into the field of play (BHFP). Like McCracken, Tippett found that a pitcher's BABIP was very volatile on an annual basis. It varied much more widely each year from a pitcher's career average than did home runs or walks. But he also found large and significant differences between pitchers' career averages. In many cases, it was these differences that accounted for the pitchers' relative success.
A simple formula, known as Defense-Independent Component ERA (DICE),<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.sportsmogul.com/content/dice.htm |title=Sports Mogul {{!}} Official Site for Baseball Mogul and Football Mogul {{!}} Online Multi-Player Games for Fantasy, Rotisserie and Computer Sports Fans<!-- Bot generated title --> |access-date=2006-02-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070528164743/http://www.sportsmogul.com/content/dice.htm |archive-date=2007-05-28 |url-status=dead }}</ref> was created by ] in 1998:

To better evaluate pitchers in light of his theory, McCracken developed "]" (dERA), the most well-known defense-independent pitching statistic. McCracken's formula for dERA is incredibly complicated, with a number of steps. A simpler formula, known as Defense-Independent Component ERA (DICE) was created by ] in ] and can be calculated using simple math:


:<math>DICE=3.00 + \frac{13HR + 3(BB + HBP) - 2K}{IP}</math> :<math>DICE=3.00 + \frac{13HR + 3(BB + HBP) - 2K}{IP}</math>


In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "HBP" is hit batters, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation gives a number that is better at predicting a pitcher's ERA in the following year, when compared to the pitcher's actual ERA in the current year. In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "HBP" is hit batters, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation gives a number that is better at predicting a pitcher's ERA in the following year than the pitcher's actual ERA in the current year.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://captaincalculator.com/sports/baseball/defense-independent-component-era-calculator/|title=Defense-Independent Component ERA (DICE) Calculator (Baseball)|website=Captain Calculator}}</ref>


===FIP===
Neither DIPS ERA (dERA) nor DICE are as useful for ] and other "trick" pitchers. Recent research indicates that pitchers with extremely slow changeups are systematically underrated by dERA, although the validity of this research has been questioned by some.
] independently derived a similar formula, known as Fielding Independent Pitching,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tangotiger.net/drspectrum.html |title=Archived copy |website=www.tangotiger.net |access-date=13 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040804215058/http://www.tangotiger.net/drspectrum.html |archive-date=4 August 2004 |url-status=dead}}</ref> which is very close to the results of dERA and DICE.


:<math>FIP=\frac{13HR + 3BB - 2K}{IP}</math>
However, in recent years, McCracken has created version 2.0 of dERA, which incorporates the value of knuckleballers and other types of pitchers in affecting the number of hits allowed on balls hit in the field of play (BHFP).


In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation usually gives a number that is nothing close to a normal ] (this is the FIP core), so the equation used is more often (but not always) this one:<ref>{{cite web|title=FIP|url=http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/fip/|website=Fangraphs|accessdate=25 August 2016}}</ref>
Despite Tippetts's claims, the work done by McCracken and others on DIPS is regarded by many in the sabermetric community as the most important piece of baseball research done in many years. They believe McCracken's work still appears to show that this effect is smaller than the conventional wisdom had assumed.


:<math>FIP=\frac{13HR + 3BB - 2K}{IP}+C</math>
== Alternate Formulae ==


where C is a constant that renders league FIP for the time period in question equal to league ERA for the same period. It is calculated as:
=== FIP ===


:<math>C = lgERA - {{13(lgHR) + 3(lgBB) - 2(lgK) \over lgIP }}</math>
], an internet ], publicized a simpler formula, known as Fielding Independent Pitching, which is very close to the results of dERA and DICE.


where lgERA is the league average ERA, lgHR is the number of home runs in the league, lgBB is the number of walks in the league, lgK is the number of strikeouts in the league, and lgIP is the number of innings pitched in the league.
:<math>FIP=\frac{13HR + 3BB - 2K}{IP}</math>


], a popular baseball statistics website, uses a slightly different FIP equation, instead using 3*(BB+HBP-IBB) rather than simply 3*(BB) where "HBP" stands for batters hit by pitch and "IBB" stands for intentional base on balls.<ref>.</ref>
In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation gives you a number that is nothing close to a normal ], so the equation used is more often (but not always) this one:


===xFIP===
:<math>FIP=\frac{13HR + 3BB - 2K}{IP}+3.20</math>


Dave Studeman of The Hardball Times derived Expected Fielding Independent Pitching (xFIP), a regressed version of FIP. Calculated like FIP, it differs in that it normalizes the number of home runs the pitcher allows, replacing a pitcher's actual home run total with an expected home run total (xHR).<ref>{{cite web|title=xFIP|url=http://www.fangraphs.com/library/pitching/xfip/|website=Fangraphs|accessdate=25 August 2016}}</ref>
That equation gives a number that is much closer to a potential pitcher's ERA.


:<math>xFIP=\frac{13(xHR) + 3BB - 2K}{IP}+ C</math>
The Hardball Times, a popular baseball statistics website, uses a slightly different FIP equation, instead using 3*(BB+HBP) rather than simply 3*(BB) where "HBP" stands for batters hit by pitch.


where xHR is calculated using the league average home run per fly ball rate (lgHR/FB) multiplied by the number of fly balls the pitcher has allowed.


:<math>xHR = Fly Balls * lgHR/FB</math>
==See also==


Typically, the lgHR/FB is around 10.5%, meaning 10.5% of fly balls go for home runs. In 2015, it was 11.4%.<ref>{{cite web|title=Fangraphs - Pitching League Stats - Batted Ball|url=http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=0&type=2&season=2015&month=0&season1=2002&ind=0&team=0,ss&rost=0&age=&filter=&players=0|website=Fangraphs|accessdate=25 August 2016}}</ref>

===SIERA===

Baseball Prospectus invented this statistic, which takes into account balls in play and adjusts for balls in play. For example, if a pitcher has a high xFIP, but also induces a lot of ground balls and popups, his SIERA will be lower than his xFIP. The calculations for it are as follows:

:<math>SIERA=6.145 - 16.986(SO/PA) + 11.434(BB/PA) - 1.858((GB-FB-PU)/PA) + 7.653((SO/PA)^2) +/- 6.664(((GB-FB-PU)/PA)^2) + 10.130(SO/PA)((GB-FB-PU)/PA) - 5.195(BB/PA)*((GB-FB-PU)/PA)</math>
where SO is ], PA is ], BB is ], GB is ], FB is ], and PU is ]

==Origins==
In 1999, ] became the first to detail and publicize these effects to the baseball research community when he wrote on rec.sport.baseball, "I've been working on a pitching evaluation tool and thought I'd post it here to get some feedback. I call it 'Defensive Independent Pitching' and what it does is evaluate a pitcher base strictly on the statistics his defense has no ability to affect..."<ref>{{cite web | title=Google Groups | website=Google Groups | url=https://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.baseball.analysis/msg/b450fe58c05a5a82?hl=en&lr= | access-date=2020-08-23}}</ref> Until the publication of a more widely read article in 2001, however, on ], most of the baseball research community believed that individual pitchers had an inherent ability to prevent hits on balls in play.<ref>Voros McCracken, "Pitching and Defense: How Much Control Do Hurlers Have?," .</ref> McCracken reasoned that if this ability existed, it would be noticeable in a pitcher's 'Batting Average on Balls In Play' (]). His research found the opposite to be true: that while a pitcher's ability to cause strikeouts or prevent home runs remained somewhat constant from season to season, his ability to prevent hits on balls in play did not.

To better evaluate pitchers in light of his theory, McCracken developed "]" (dERA), the most well-known defense-independent pitching statistic. McCracken's formula for dERA is very complicated, with a number of steps.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.futilityinfielder.com/dips2.html|title=Defense Independent Pitching Stats Part II|website=www.futilityinfielder.com}}</ref> DIP ERA is not as useful for ]ers and other "trick" pitchers, a factor that McCracken mentioned a few days after his original announcement of his research findings in 1999, in a posting on the rec.sport.baseball.analysis Usenet site on November 23, 1999, when he wrote: "Also to is that, anecdotally, I believe pitchers with trick deliveries (e.g. Knuckleballers) might post consistently lower $H numbers than other pitchers. I looked at ]'s career and that seems to bear out slightly".<ref>{{cite web | title=Google Groups | website=Google Groups | url=https://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.baseball.analysis/browse_thread/thread/f9f708f94ccb8696/b450fe58c05a5a82?lnk=st&q=+voros+%EE%8A%B7nse-independent-pitching-stats#b450fe58c05a5a82 | access-date=2020-08-23}}</ref>

In later postings on the rec.sport.baseball site during 1999 and 2000 (prior to the publication of his widely read article on BaseballProspectus.com in 2001), McCracken also discussed other pitcher characteristics that might influence BABIP.<ref>{{cite web | title=BBTF's Newsblog Discussion :: vorosmccracken: Me Being Arrogant Again | website=Baseball Think Factory | date=2007-11-16 | url=http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/newsstand/discussion/vorosmccracken_me_being_arrogant_again/P100/ | access-date=2020-08-23}}</ref> In 2002 McCracken created and published version 2.0 of dERA, which incorporates the ability of knuckleballers and other types of pitchers to affect the number of hits allowed on balls hit in the field of play (BHFP).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/primate_studies/discussion/mccracken_2002-01-25_0/|title=BBTF's Primate Studies Discussion :: DIPS Version 2.0|website=www.baseballthinkfactory.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/mccracken/dipsexpl.html|title=Defense Independent Pitching Stats, Version 2.0 Formula|website=www.baseballthinkfactory.org}}</ref>

==Controversy==
Controversy over DIP was heightened when Tom Tippett at ] published his own findings in 2003. Tippett concluded that the differences between pitchers in preventing hits on balls in play were at least partially the result of the pitcher's skill.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://diamond-mind.com/blogs/baseball-articles|title=Baseball Articles|website=Diamond Mind Baseball|date=11 November 2015 }}</ref> Tippett analyzed certain groups of pitchers that appear to be able to reduce the number of hits allowed on balls hit into the field of play (BHFP). Like McCracken, Tippett found that pitchers' ] was more volatile on an annual basis than the rates at which they gave up home runs or walks. It was this greater volatility that had led McCracken to conclude pitchers had "little or no control" over hits on balls in play. But Tippett also found large and significant differences between pitchers' career BABIP. In many cases, it was these differences that accounted for the pitchers' relative success.

However, improvements to DIP that look at more nuanced defense-independent stats than strikeouts, home runs, and walks (such as groundball rate), have been able to account for many of the BABIP differences that Tippet identified without reintroducing the noise from defense variability.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://library.fangraphs.com/pitching/batted-ball/|title=GB%, LD%, FB% &#124; Sabermetrics Library}}</ref>

Despite other criticisms, the work by McCracken on DIP is regarded by many in the sabermetric community as the most important piece of baseball research in many years. As ] wrote in 2012, "When Voros McCracken wrote his seminal piece on pitching and defense 11 years ago, he helped change the way people—fans, writers, even general managers—think about run prevention in baseball. Where once we used to throw most of the blame for a hit on the pitcher who gave it up, McCracken helped us realize that a slew of other factors go into whether a ball hit into play falls for a hit. For many people in the game and others who simply watch it, our ability to recognize the influence of defense, park effects, and dumb luck can be traced back to that one little article".<ref>Jonah Keri, "Fantasy Fiesta: Pitching Stock Tips," ]<span>, June 7, 2012</span>.</ref>

DIP ERA was added to ESPN.com's Sortable Stats in 2004.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.espn.com/mlb/stats|title=2020 MLB Stat Leaders|website=ESPN}}</ref>

==See also==
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]

==References==
{{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
* - ]
*

*
{{Baseball statistics}}
*

*
]
*
* Jay Jaffe's summary and updating of DIPS statistics, 2004]
]
]

Latest revision as of 03:37, 28 October 2024

Type of baseball statistic

In baseball, fielding independent pitching (FIP) (also referred to as defense independent pitching (DIP)) is intended to measure a pitcher's effectiveness based only on statistics that do not involve fielders (except the catcher). These include home runs allowed, strikeouts, hit batters, walks, and, more recently, fly ball percentage, ground ball percentage, and (to a much lesser extent) line drive percentage. By focusing on these statistics and ignoring what happens once a ball is put in play, which – on most plays – the pitcher has little control over, DIP claims to offer a clearer picture of the pitcher's true ability.

The most controversial part of DIP is the idea that pitchers have little influence over what happens to balls that are put into play. Some people believe this has been well-established (see below), primarily by showing the large variability of most pitchers' BABIP from year to year. However, there is a wide variation in career BABIP among pitchers, and this seems to correlate with career success. For instance, no pitcher in the Hall of Fame has a below-average career BABIP.

Formulae

Each of the following formulae uses innings pitched (IP), a measure of the number of outs a team made while a pitcher was in the game. Since most outs rely on fielding, the results from calculations using IP are not truly independent of team defense. While the creators of DICE, FIP and similar statistics all suggest they are "defense independent", others have pointed out that their formulas involve (IP). IP is a statistical measure of how many outs were made while a pitcher was pitching. This includes those made by fielders who are typically involved in more than two thirds of the outs. These critics claim this makes pitchers' DICE or FIP highly dependent on the defensive play of their fielders.

DICE

A simple formula, known as Defense-Independent Component ERA (DICE), was created by Clay Dreslough in 1998:

D I C E = 3.00 + 13 H R + 3 ( B B + H B P ) 2 K I P {\displaystyle DICE=3.00+{\frac {13HR+3(BB+HBP)-2K}{IP}}}

In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "HBP" is hit batters, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation gives a number that is better at predicting a pitcher's ERA in the following year than the pitcher's actual ERA in the current year.

FIP

Tom Tango independently derived a similar formula, known as Fielding Independent Pitching, which is very close to the results of dERA and DICE.

F I P = 13 H R + 3 B B 2 K I P {\displaystyle FIP={\frac {13HR+3BB-2K}{IP}}}

In that equation, "HR" is home runs, "BB" is walks, "K" is strikeouts, and "IP" is innings pitched. That equation usually gives a number that is nothing close to a normal ERA (this is the FIP core), so the equation used is more often (but not always) this one:

F I P = 13 H R + 3 B B 2 K I P + C {\displaystyle FIP={\frac {13HR+3BB-2K}{IP}}+C}

where C is a constant that renders league FIP for the time period in question equal to league ERA for the same period. It is calculated as:

C = l g E R A 13 ( l g H R ) + 3 ( l g B B ) 2 ( l g K ) l g I P {\displaystyle C=lgERA-{13(lgHR)+3(lgBB)-2(lgK) \over lgIP}}

where lgERA is the league average ERA, lgHR is the number of home runs in the league, lgBB is the number of walks in the league, lgK is the number of strikeouts in the league, and lgIP is the number of innings pitched in the league.

The Hardball Times, a popular baseball statistics website, uses a slightly different FIP equation, instead using 3*(BB+HBP-IBB) rather than simply 3*(BB) where "HBP" stands for batters hit by pitch and "IBB" stands for intentional base on balls.

xFIP

Dave Studeman of The Hardball Times derived Expected Fielding Independent Pitching (xFIP), a regressed version of FIP. Calculated like FIP, it differs in that it normalizes the number of home runs the pitcher allows, replacing a pitcher's actual home run total with an expected home run total (xHR).

x F I P = 13 ( x H R ) + 3 B B 2 K I P + C {\displaystyle xFIP={\frac {13(xHR)+3BB-2K}{IP}}+C}

where xHR is calculated using the league average home run per fly ball rate (lgHR/FB) multiplied by the number of fly balls the pitcher has allowed.

x H R = F l y B a l l s l g H R / F B {\displaystyle xHR=FlyBalls*lgHR/FB}

Typically, the lgHR/FB is around 10.5%, meaning 10.5% of fly balls go for home runs. In 2015, it was 11.4%.

SIERA

Baseball Prospectus invented this statistic, which takes into account balls in play and adjusts for balls in play. For example, if a pitcher has a high xFIP, but also induces a lot of ground balls and popups, his SIERA will be lower than his xFIP. The calculations for it are as follows:

S I E R A = 6.145 16.986 ( S O / P A ) + 11.434 ( B B / P A ) 1.858 ( ( G B F B P U ) / P A ) + 7.653 ( ( S O / P A ) 2 ) + / 6.664 ( ( ( G B F B P U ) / P A ) 2 ) + 10.130 ( S O / P A ) ( ( G B F B P U ) / P A ) 5.195 ( B B / P A ) ( ( G B F B P U ) / P A ) {\displaystyle SIERA=6.145-16.986(SO/PA)+11.434(BB/PA)-1.858((GB-FB-PU)/PA)+7.653((SO/PA)^{2})+/-6.664(((GB-FB-PU)/PA)^{2})+10.130(SO/PA)((GB-FB-PU)/PA)-5.195(BB/PA)*((GB-FB-PU)/PA)}

where SO is strikeouts, PA is plate appearances, BB is bases on balls, GB is ground ball, FB is fly ball, and PU is pop-up

Origins

In 1999, Voros McCracken became the first to detail and publicize these effects to the baseball research community when he wrote on rec.sport.baseball, "I've been working on a pitching evaluation tool and thought I'd post it here to get some feedback. I call it 'Defensive Independent Pitching' and what it does is evaluate a pitcher base strictly on the statistics his defense has no ability to affect..." Until the publication of a more widely read article in 2001, however, on Baseball Prospectus, most of the baseball research community believed that individual pitchers had an inherent ability to prevent hits on balls in play. McCracken reasoned that if this ability existed, it would be noticeable in a pitcher's 'Batting Average on Balls In Play' (BABIP). His research found the opposite to be true: that while a pitcher's ability to cause strikeouts or prevent home runs remained somewhat constant from season to season, his ability to prevent hits on balls in play did not.

To better evaluate pitchers in light of his theory, McCracken developed "Defense-Independent ERA" (dERA), the most well-known defense-independent pitching statistic. McCracken's formula for dERA is very complicated, with a number of steps. DIP ERA is not as useful for knuckleballers and other "trick" pitchers, a factor that McCracken mentioned a few days after his original announcement of his research findings in 1999, in a posting on the rec.sport.baseball.analysis Usenet site on November 23, 1999, when he wrote: "Also to is that, anecdotally, I believe pitchers with trick deliveries (e.g. Knuckleballers) might post consistently lower $H numbers than other pitchers. I looked at Tim Wakefield's career and that seems to bear out slightly".

In later postings on the rec.sport.baseball site during 1999 and 2000 (prior to the publication of his widely read article on BaseballProspectus.com in 2001), McCracken also discussed other pitcher characteristics that might influence BABIP. In 2002 McCracken created and published version 2.0 of dERA, which incorporates the ability of knuckleballers and other types of pitchers to affect the number of hits allowed on balls hit in the field of play (BHFP).

Controversy

Controversy over DIP was heightened when Tom Tippett at Diamond Mind published his own findings in 2003. Tippett concluded that the differences between pitchers in preventing hits on balls in play were at least partially the result of the pitcher's skill. Tippett analyzed certain groups of pitchers that appear to be able to reduce the number of hits allowed on balls hit into the field of play (BHFP). Like McCracken, Tippett found that pitchers' BABIP was more volatile on an annual basis than the rates at which they gave up home runs or walks. It was this greater volatility that had led McCracken to conclude pitchers had "little or no control" over hits on balls in play. But Tippett also found large and significant differences between pitchers' career BABIP. In many cases, it was these differences that accounted for the pitchers' relative success.

However, improvements to DIP that look at more nuanced defense-independent stats than strikeouts, home runs, and walks (such as groundball rate), have been able to account for many of the BABIP differences that Tippet identified without reintroducing the noise from defense variability.

Despite other criticisms, the work by McCracken on DIP is regarded by many in the sabermetric community as the most important piece of baseball research in many years. As Jonah Keri wrote in 2012, "When Voros McCracken wrote his seminal piece on pitching and defense 11 years ago, he helped change the way people—fans, writers, even general managers—think about run prevention in baseball. Where once we used to throw most of the blame for a hit on the pitcher who gave it up, McCracken helped us realize that a slew of other factors go into whether a ball hit into play falls for a hit. For many people in the game and others who simply watch it, our ability to recognize the influence of defense, park effects, and dumb luck can be traced back to that one little article".

DIP ERA was added to ESPN.com's Sortable Stats in 2004.

See also

References

  1. For an extended overview of the development of DIP and alternative formulas, see Dan Basco and Michael Davies, "The Many Flavors of DIPS: A History and an Overview," Society for American Baseball Research, Baseball Research Journal, Fall 2010, Vol. 32, Issue 2.
  2. "Granny Baseball: Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) Isn't Fielding Independent". June 10, 2010.
  3. "Sports Mogul | Official Site for Baseball Mogul and Football Mogul | Online Multi-Player Games for Fantasy, Rotisserie and Computer Sports Fans". Archived from the original on 2007-05-28. Retrieved 2006-02-13.
  4. "Defense-Independent Component ERA (DICE) Calculator (Baseball)". Captain Calculator.
  5. "Archived copy". www.tangotiger.net. Archived from the original on 4 August 2004. Retrieved 13 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. "FIP". Fangraphs. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
  7. FIP — Hardball Times Glossary.
  8. "xFIP". Fangraphs. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
  9. "Fangraphs - Pitching League Stats - Batted Ball". Fangraphs. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
  10. "Google Groups". Google Groups. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  11. Voros McCracken, "Pitching and Defense: How Much Control Do Hurlers Have?," BaseballProspectus.com, January 23, 2001.
  12. "Defense Independent Pitching Stats Part II". www.futilityinfielder.com.
  13. "Google Groups". Google Groups. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  14. "BBTF's Newsblog Discussion :: vorosmccracken: Me Being Arrogant Again". Baseball Think Factory. 2007-11-16. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  15. "BBTF's Primate Studies Discussion :: DIPS Version 2.0". www.baseballthinkfactory.org.
  16. "Defense Independent Pitching Stats, Version 2.0 Formula". www.baseballthinkfactory.org.
  17. "Baseball Articles". Diamond Mind Baseball. 11 November 2015.
  18. "GB%, LD%, FB% | Sabermetrics Library".
  19. Jonah Keri, "Fantasy Fiesta: Pitching Stock Tips," Grantland, June 7, 2012.
  20. "2020 MLB Stat Leaders". ESPN.

External links

Baseball statistics
Batting
Base running
Pitching
Fielding
Sabermetrics
Category: