| Revision as of 02:51, 21 June 2006 editWoohookitty (talk | contribs)Administrators611,225 edits →Repeated [] violations by []← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024 edit undoNewyorkbrad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,478 edits update to remove reference to RfCs, as user-conduct RfCs were discontinued several years ago | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{historical}} | |||
| {{editabuselinks}}<br /> | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :'''This process has been discontinued per ].''' | |||
| <!-- List editors who are making personal attacks below this line. Head with "=={{User|PROBLEM USER}}==", replacing PROBLEM USER with the user name concerned. --> | |||
| ==Repeated ] violations by ]== | |||
| The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on ] ], was intended as a counterpart to ]. A person with complaints over ] could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page. | |||
| After discovering a particularly on ]'s ] in response to Getcrunk on Biff loman9's ], I gave ] a . He subsequently my warning with the editorial commentary, "deleting comment from loser who needs to get a life...(there are so many", I his deletion of my warning informing him to not make personal attacks in commentary and to not delete warning messages. He again with the editorial commentary, "Leave my own page alone. Go outside and play.". I did a whereupon he again deleted my warning with the editorial commentary, "Will you please fuck off?". It seems that this user needs to do a bit of cooling off. Thanks. ] 02:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :] has been of this report. ] 02:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While ] is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite ]. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and ] on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was ], with the result that the noticeboard was closed on {{#formatdate:10 January 2007}}. | |||
| ::After and corresponding edit commentary, "How many times were you stuffed into your locker in high school. Let me say this plainly: FUCK OFF" the original warning should be restored and his talk page sprotected. ] 02:15, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I agree with Netscott's comments. This user seems to have a habit going (see , ) Anyway, I am too tired to do any further "investigation". -- <font face="tahoma">] ]</font> 02:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the ], ] or, as a last resort, ]. | |||
| ::::I'll block him for 24 hours to start. We've given him plenty of chances. --]<sup>]</sup> 02:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===Procedure=== | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 13 August 2024
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
- This process has been discontinued per this discussion.
The personal attack intervention noticeboard (PAIN), created on 7 October 2005, was intended as a counterpart to the request for intervention against vandalism page. A person with complaints over personal attacks could, after giving warnings, report a personal attacker on this page.
Unfortunately, the noticeboard generated a considerable amount of controversy. While vandalism is usually a clear cut case, and administrator intervention (i.e. blocking) is usually uncontroversial, determining whether a comment is a personal attack, incivil, or just simply blunt and frank, can be quite subjective. That led to a lot of arguments, flame wars, tit-for-tat disputes and wikilawyering on this page. Even after several warnings as well as changes to the header designed to instruct users on how to use this page, this noticeboard continued to deteriorate. Due to this deterioration as well as some particularly poor exchanges in December 2006, the entire page was nominated for deletion, with the result that the noticeboard was closed on 10 January 2007.
The closure of this noticeboard does not mean that personal attacks are tolerated; they should never be. It simply means that complaints over personal attacks are moved to different, and more appropriate venues such as the administrators' noticeboard, dispute resolution or, as a last resort, arbitration.
Procedure
Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard/Header
Categories: