Misplaced Pages

Thomas DiLorenzo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:33, 18 March 2014 editSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers299,663 edits "Examined" is a neutral description (not interpreted by editors) of the article; expand the descript; tag the "investigation" as needing update.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:14, 11 November 2024 edit undoChopinAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,184 edits add template 
(252 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|American economist (born 1954)}}
{{BLP primary sources|date=March 2023}}
{{Infobox economist {{Infobox economist
|school_tradition = ] |school_tradition = ]
|color = firebrick |image = Thomas DiLorenzo by Gage Skidmore 2.jpg
|image = Thomas DiLorenzo by Gage Skidmore.jpg |caption = DiLorenzo in October 2017
|caption = Thomas DiLorenzo at ] in February 2010.
|name = Thomas DiLorenzo |name = Thomas DiLorenzo
|birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1954|08|08}} |birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1954|08|08}}
|residence = ], ]<ref>http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/108102.html</ref>
|birth_place = |birth_place =
|death_date = |death_date =
|death_place = |death_place =
|nationality = ] |nationality = American
|field = ], ], ] |field = ]
|influences = ], ]<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, , Mises Daily, September 27, 2004.</ref> |influences = ], ]<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, , Mises Daily, September 27, 2004.</ref>
|opposed =
|influenced = |influenced =
|contributions = |contributions =
| module =
{{Infobox person
| child = yes
| signature = Thomas DiLorenzo signature (transparent).png
}} }}


}}
'''Thomas James DiLorenzo''' (born August 8, 1954) is an American ] ] at ] ].<ref name=loyola>], ] and , ''accessed November 22, 2013''.</ref> He identifies himself as an adherent of the ] of economics.<ref> at ] website, August 16, 2010.</ref> He is a research fellow at ],<ref> at ] website, ''accessed November 22, 2013''.</ref> a senior fellow of the ],<ref name= "mises">, at the ] website, ''accessed November 22, 2013.''</ref> and an associate of the ].<ref>, ''accessed November 22, 2013.''</ref> He holds a ] in Economics from ].<ref name=loyola/>

'''Thomas James DiLorenzo''' ({{IPAc-en|d|i|l|ə|ˈ|r|ɛ|n|z|oʊ}}; born August 8, 1954) is an American author and former university economics professor who is the President of the ].<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":0" /> He has written books denouncing ] and is well known among economists for his work chronicling the history of ] policy in the United States.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{Cite book |last=Barr |first=John McKee |title=Loathing Lincoln: An American Tradition from the Civil War to the Present |publisher=LSU Press |year=2014 |isbn=9780807153857 |location=United States}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-03-08 |title=Tom DiLorenzo on Antitrust, Abe Lincoln, and the Future of the Austrian School {{!}} Mises Institute |url=https://mises.org/podcasts/human-action-podcast/tom-dilorenzo-antitrust-abe-lincoln-and-future-austrian-school |access-date=2024-09-30 |website=mises.org |language=en}}</ref>

He is a research fellow at ],<ref> at ] website, ''accessed November 22, 2013''.</ref> Board of Advisors member at ],<ref>{{Cite web |title=CFACT Board of Advisors |url=https://www.cfact.org/about/cfact-board-of-advisors/ |access-date=2022-03-05 |archive-date=2022-03-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220305230523/https://www.cfact.org/about/cfact-board-of-advisors/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> and an associate of the ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203041949/http://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/index.php/associates|date=2013-12-03}}, ''accessed November 22, 2013.''</ref> He identifies with the ] of economics.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013715/http://archive.mises.org/13581/faculty-spotlight-interview-thomas-dilorenzo/ |date=2013-12-03 }} at ] website, August 16, 2010.</ref> He has spoken in favor of ] and has been described as an ally of, or part of, the ] movement.<ref name="Weinberg 2009 pp. 64–64" /><ref name="Milbank" /><ref name=":2" />


==Life and work== ==Life and work==
Thomas James DiLorenzo grew up in western ], descended from Italian immigrants. In an essay he attributed his individualism to playing sports. He began to study ] in college.<ref name="evil">DiLorenzo, Thomas, , ], 25 December 2002.</ref>


He has a BA in Economics from ] in Pennsylvania.<ref name="Wile">, ''The Daily Bell,'' 16 May 2010, published by High Alert Capital Partners.</ref> He holds a ] in Economics from ].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2009 |title=Sellinger School of Business Profile of Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo |url=https://www.loyola.edu/webtrans/aca/sellingertest/profile.html?profile=2009053&directory=1487196 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514100639/http://www.loyola.edu/webtrans/aca/sellingertest/profile.html?profile=2009053&directory=1487196 |archive-date=2013-05-14 |access-date=2015-02-27 |website=], ]}}</ref>
DiLorenzo grew up in western ]. In an autobiographical essay he attributes his early commitment to individualism to "playing competitive sports." He also details how he came to believe in the 1960s that the "government was busy destroying the work ethic, the family, and the criminal justice system." This, plus his experiences regarding the ] and the ], led him to the opinion that politics was “evil”.<ref name=evil>DiLorenzo, Thomas, , ], December 25, 2002. </ref>


DiLorenzo has taught at the ],<ref name="Authors">, ], January 1, 2005</ref><ref>Thomas J. DiLorenoz, , ''Public Finance Quarterly,'' Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1981, 117–119</ref> ],<ref>James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , ''Policy Analysis'' No. 49, ], February 26, 1985.</ref> and the ].<ref>Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , ''],'' Volume 4, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 180–195.</ref>
DiLorenoz has a B.A. in economics from ] in Pennsylvania.<ref name=Wile>Anthony Wile,
], The Daily Bell, May 16, 2010.</ref> He holds a ] in Economics from ].<ref name=loyola/>


He is a former adjunct fellow of the Center for the Study of American Business at ].<ref name=Authors/><ref>Thomas J. DiLorenzo, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131212203021/http://wc.wustl.edu/files/wc/imce/suburban_legend.pdf |date=2013-12-12 }}, ] Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, "Contemporary Issues", Series 97, November 1999.</ref> From 1992 to 2020, he was a professor of economics at ] Sellinger School of Business.<ref name=Authors/> As of 2020, DiLorenzo was no longer listed as active faculty at Loyola University, and instead as a professor emeritus.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=The Joseph A. Sellinger, S.J., School of Business and Management – Loyola University Maryland – Acalog ACMS™ |url=https://catalogue.loyola.edu/preview_entity.php?catoid=17&ent_oid=858&hl=economics&returnto=search |access-date=2022-11-01 |website=catalogue.loyola.edu}}</ref> He is a research fellow at the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Thomas J. DiLorenzo |url=https://www.independent.org/aboutus/person_detail.asp?id=544 |access-date=2022-11-01 |website=The Independent Institute}}</ref>
DiLorenzo has taught at the ],<ref name=Authors>, ], January 1, 2005, ''via ].''</ref><ref>Thomas J. DiLorenoz, ], Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1981, 117-119</ref> ].<ref>James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , Policy Analysis No. 49, ], February 26, 1985.</ref> and the ].<ref>Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , ], Volume 4, Issue 1, 1990, pp 180-195.</ref> He is a former adjunct fellow of the Center for the Study of American Business at ]<ref>Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , ] Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, “Contemporary Issues”, Series 97, November 1999.</ref><ref name=Authors/> He has been a professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business since 1992.<ref name=Authors/>


DiLorenzo is a speaker at ] events and teaches some of its online courses.<ref name="mises"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211183805/http://academy.mises.org/faculty/thomas-j-dilorenzo/|date=2013-12-11}}, at the ] website, ''accessed November 22, 2013.''</ref> He writes for the blog ].<ref> for ].</ref> He was listed as an affiliated scholar though 2009 of the Institute for the Study of Southern Culture, which is run by the ], a ] group.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Beirich |first=Heidi |date=February 9, 2011 |title=Ron Paul Invites Neo-Confederate Witness to Testify in Congress |url=https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/02/09/ron-paul-invites-neo-confederate-witness-testify-congress |access-date=2023-10-23 |website=] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Reichman |first=Henry |title= The Future of Academic Freedom |publisher= Johns Hopkins University Press  |year=2019 |isbn=9781421428598 |location=United States |pages=116}}</ref><ref name="Milbank" /> The ] (SPLC) in 2004 described DiLorenzo as one of 10 key ideologues in the ] movement.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last1=Beirich |first1=Heidi |last2=Potok |first2=Mark |date=December 21, 2004 |title=The Ideologues |url=https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2004/ideologues |access-date=2023-10-23 |website=Southern Poverty Law Center |language=en}}</ref>
DiLorenzo is a frequent speaker at ] events, and offers several online courses on political subjects on the Mises Academy platform.<ref name = "mises" /> He also writes for ].<ref> for ].</ref>


==Views== ==Views==
{{Conservatism US|commentators}}
{{Expand section|date=December 2013}}
DiLorenzo writes about what he calls "the myth of Lincoln" in American history and politics. He has said, " Lincoln is on record time after time rejecting the idea of racial equality. But whenever anyone brings this up, the Lincoln partisans go to the extreme to smear the bearer of bad news."<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, , ''Mises Daily'', 3 June 2002]</ref> DiLorenzo has also spoken out in favor of the secession of the ], defending the right of these states to secede.<ref name=Abolitionist>Thomas DiLorenzo, , LewRockwell.com, October 20, 2004].</ref> DiLorenzo writes about what he calls "the myth of Lincoln" in American history and politics. He has said, "Lincoln is on record time after time rejecting the idea of racial equality. But whenever anyone brings this up, the Lincoln partisans go to the extreme to smear the bearer of bad news."<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, , ''Mises Daily'', 3 June 2002]</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Abraham Lincoln Online: Speeches and Writing|title=Letter to Henry L. Pierce and others|url=http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/pierce.htm|access-date=26 February 2016}}</ref> DiLorenzo has spoken out in favor of the secession of the ], defending the right of these states to secede from an abolitionist perspective.<ref name="Abolitionist">Thomas DiLorenzo, , LewRockwell.com, October 20, 2004].</ref>{{Third-party inline|date=June 2023}} He has described himself as a ].<ref name="Milbank" /> He has called the ] the "War for Southern Independence".<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Kirchick |first=James |date=2008-01-08 |title=Angry White Man |magazine=The New Republic |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/61771/angry-white-man |access-date=2023-10-23 |issn=0028-6583}}</ref>


DiLorenzo is critical of ]'s financial views, the concept of "implied powers" in the Constitution, the existence of a federal bank, and the use of Keynesian economics to increase the national debt.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Dilorenzo |first=Thomas J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=M3FFs3BKugoC&dq=hamiltons+curse&pg=PA10 |title=Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution – and What It Means for Americans Today |date=2009 |publisher=Crown Publishing Group |isbn=978-0307382856 |language=en}}</ref>{{primary inline|date=September 2024}}
==Books==
DiLorenzo's book, '']'' is a critical biography published in 2002.<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, ''The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War'', Random House LLC, 2002, ISBN 9780307559388.</ref> In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, ] described DiLorenzo's thesis: Lincoln was a "white supremacist" with no principled interest in abolishing slavery, and believed in a strong central government that imposed high tariffs and a nationalized banking system. He attributes the South's secession to Lincoln's economic policies rather than a desire to preserve slavery. Gordon quotes DiLorenzo: "slavery was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons".<ref>] review of Thomas J. DiLorenzo, , ''The Mises Review'', Vol 8, No 2, February 2002.</ref>


DiLorenzo is critical of ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/06/thomas-dilorenzo/neocons-are-unhinged/|title = Neocons Are Unhinged}}</ref>{{primary inline|date=September 2024}}
Reviewing for '']'', a think tank associated with DiLorenzo, Professor Richard M. Gamble called the book "travesty of historical method and documentation". He said the book was plagued by a "labyrinth of errors", and concluded that DiLorenzo has "earned the ... ridicule of his critics."<ref>Gamble, Richard M. "The Real Lincoln: Book review" ''The Independent Review'' .</ref> In his review for the ], Ken Masugi writes that "DiLorenzo adopts as his own the fundamental mistake of leftist multiculturalist historians: confusing the issue of race with the much more fundamental one, which was slavery." He noted that in Illinois "the anti-slavery forces actually joined with racists to keep their state free of slavery, and also free of blacks." Masugi called DiLorenzo's work "shabby" and stated that DiLorenzo's treatment of Lincoln was "feckless" and that the book is "truly awful".<ref>{{cite web|last=Masugi|first=Ken|title=The Unreal Lincoln|url=http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.226/pub_detail.asp|publisher=Claremont Institute|accessdate=26 November 2013}}</ref><ref>] is an academic in the fields of American history and multiculturalism at Johns Hopkins University and the Claremont Institute. See: {{cite web|title=Ken Masugi Faculty bio|url=http://advanced.jhu.edu/about-us/faculty/ken-masugi-phd/|publisher=Johns Hopkins University|accessdate=26 November 2013}}</ref> In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Claremont Institute fellow professor ] on the merits of ]'s statesmanship before and during the Civil War.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate|url=http://www.independent.org/events/transcript.asp?eventID=9|work=Events|publisher=The ]|author=]|coauthors=Thomas J. DiLorenzo|date=May 7, 2002}}</ref>


DiLorenzo is critical of the ], noting that "the Sherman Act was never intended to protect competition. It was a blatantly protectionist act designed to shield smaller and less efficient businesses from their larger competitors. There never was a golden age of antitrust."<ref>{{Cite web |date=1991-02-24 |title=The Antitrust Economists' Paradox {{!}} Mises Institute |url=https://mises.org/articles-interest/antitrust-economists-paradox |access-date=2024-09-30 |website=mises.org |language=en}}</ref>
DiLorenzo's book, '']'' (2007), continues his explorations begun in ''The Real Lincoln.''<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, ''Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe'', Random House LLC, 2007, ISBN 030749652X</ref> In a review, David Gordon stated that DiLorenzo's thesis in the 2007 volume was that Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery to new states because black labor would compete with white labor; that Lincoln hoped that all blacks would eventually be deported to Africa in order that white laborers could have more work. According to Gordon, DiLorenzo states that Lincoln only supported emancipation of slaves as a wartime expedient to help defeat the south.<ref>David Gordon review of ''Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe'', Mises Review, Volume 13, Number 2, February 2007.</ref> Reviews in '']'' and '']'' both stated that the book seemed to be aimed at unnamed Lincoln scholars in American universities.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/12/AR2007011200119_2.html</ref><ref>http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-307-33841-9</ref>


== Books ==
==Controversy over League of the South involvement==
DiLorenzo has written extensively on Abraham Lincoln. According to one historian, "Most historians are inclined to dismiss DiLorenzo as a crackpot. But... his books generally sell better than those of academic 'Lincolnologists' and... views help lay the foundation for conservative political action today", historian ] has recently suggested that we ignore these writings at our peril."<ref name="Weinberg 2009 pp. 64–64" />
Controversy arose in 2011 when DiLorenzo testified before the ] at the request of former U.S. Congressman ]. During the hearing, Congressman ] criticized DiLorenzo for his associations with the League of the South, which Clay described as a "neo-Confederate group".<ref name="Walker">Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). . ''The Baltimore Sun''.</ref> In '']'' and '']'' articles about the hearing, a ] story about DiLorenzo's connection with the League was mentioned.<ref>Sullivan, Andy (February 9, 2011). Reuters</ref><ref>Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). The ''Baltimore Sun''</ref> '']'' columnist ] wrote about Clay's remarks and he said the League of the South was listing DiLorenzo on its Web site as an 'affiliated scholar' as recently as 2008.<ref name=Milbank>{{cite news|last=Milbank|first=Dana| authorlink=Dana Milbank |title=Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/09/AR2011020905879.html|accessdate=24 November 2013|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=February 9, 2011}}</ref><ref></ref>


DiLorenzo's book '']'' is a critical biography published in 2002.<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, ''The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War'', Random House LLC, 2002, {{ISBN|978-0307559388}}.</ref> Writing for ''The Daily Beast'', ] described DiLorenzo's technique in this book as the following: "His scholarship, such as it is, consists of rummaging through the record for anything he can find to damn Lincoln, stripping it of any nuance or context, and piling on pejorative adjectives. In DiLorenzo, the Lincoln-haters have found a champion with the judiciousness and the temperament they deserve."<ref name="lowry">{{Cite news |last=Lowry |first=Rich |date=2013-06-17 |title=The Rancid Abraham Lincoln–Haters of the Libertarian Right |language=en |work=] |url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/06/17/the-rancid-abraham-lincoln-haters-of-the-libertarian-right |access-date=2023-06-06}}</ref>
DiLorenzo denied any affiliation with the group, telling a ''Baltimore Sun'' reporter that "I don't endorse what they say and do any more than I endorse what Congress says and does because I spoke at a hearing on Wednesday." An investigation was subsequently conducted by his employer.<ref name=Burris>Burris, Joe (February 14, 2011). " The ''Baltimore Sun''</ref>{{Update after|reason=What were the results of the investigation?}} In a ] column, he described his association with the League as limited to "a few lectures on the economics of the Civil War" he gave to The League of the South Institute about thirteen years ago.<ref name="Lewrockwell.com">, ''Lewrockwell.com'', February 11, 2011</ref> In a 2005 LewRockwell.com article, DiLorenzo examined criticism of the League's social and political views, concluding that it "advocates peace and prosperity in the tradition of a George Washington or a Thomas Jefferson".<ref>Dilorenzo, Thomas J. (February 25, 2005). "". LewRockwell.com</ref>


In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, ] described DiLorenzo's thesis: Lincoln was a "white supremacist" with no principled interest in abolishing slavery, and believed in a strong central government that imposed high tariffs and a nationalized banking system. He attributes the South's secession to Lincoln's economic policies rather than a desire to preserve slavery. Gordon quotes DiLorenzo: "slavery was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons".<ref>] review of Thomas J. DiLorenzo, {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140914004104/https://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=207 |date=2014-09-14 }}, ''The Mises Review'', Vol. 8, No. 2, February 2002.</ref>
== Publications ==
DiLorenzo has authored several books, including:<ref></ref>


Reviewing for ''The Independent Review'', the magazine of ], a think tank associated with DiLorenzo,{{cn|date=March 2023}} Richard M. Gamble of ] said that the book "manages to raise fresh and morally probing questions" and that DiLorenzo "writes primarily not as a defender of the Old South and its institutions, culture, and traditions, but as a libertarian enemy of the Leviathan state" but bemoans that DiLorenzo was "careless" in his handling of sources and despite his "evident courage and ability", his execution was lacking. Gamble concludes that the book is a "travesty of ] and documentation". He said the book was plagued by a "labyrinth of errors", and that DiLorenzo has "earned the... ridicule of his critics."<ref>Gamble, Richard M. "The Real Lincoln: Book review" ''The Independent Review'' .</ref>
* ''Organized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About Government'' (2012). ], ISBN 9781610162562. {{OCLC|815625479}}

* ''Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution – and What It Means for Americans Today'' (2009). Random House LLC, ISBN 9780307382856. {{OCLC|593712801}}
In a review for the ], historian Ken Masugi writes that "DiLorenzo adopts as his own the fundamental mistake of leftist multi-culturalist historians: confusing the issue of race with the much more fundamental one, which was slavery." He noted that in Illinois "the anti-slavery forces actually joined with racists to keep their state free of slavery, and also free of blacks." Masugi called DiLorenzo's work "shabby" and stated that DiLorenzo's treatment of Lincoln was "feckless" and that the book is "truly awful".<ref>{{cite web|last=Masugi|first=Ken|title=The Unreal Lincoln|url=http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.226/pub_detail.asp|publisher=Claremont Institute|access-date=26 November 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203053713/http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.226/pub_detail.asp|archive-date=3 December 2013}}</ref><ref>] is an academic in the fields of American history and multiculturalism at Johns Hopkins University and the Claremont Institute. See: {{cite web |title=Ken Masugi Faculty bio |url=http://advanced.jhu.edu/about-us/faculty/ken-masugi-phd/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141127071826/http://advanced.jhu.edu/about-us/faculty/ken-masugi-phd/ |archive-date=27 November 2014 |access-date=26 November 2013 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University}}</ref> In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Claremont Institute fellow professor ] on the merits of ]'s statesmanship before and during the Civil War.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate|url=http://www.independent.org/events/transcript.asp?eventID=9|work=Events|publisher=The ]|author=Harry V. Jaffa|author2=Thomas J. DiLorenzo |date=May 7, 2002|author-link = Harry V. Jaffa}}</ref>
* '']'' (2006). Random House Inc, ISBN 9780307338419. {{OCLC|67727894}}

* ''How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country, From the Pilgrims to the Present'' (2004). Random House LLC, ISBN 9780761525264. {{OCLC|834478638|56895316}}
DiLorenzo's book, '']'' (2007), continues his explorations begun in ''The Real Lincoln.''<ref>Thomas DiLorenzo, ''Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe'', Random House LLC, 2007, {{ISBN|030749652X}}</ref> Reviews in '']'' and '']'' both stated that the book seemed directed at unnamed scholars who had praised Lincoln's contributions. Justin Ewers criticized DiLorenzo, saying this book "is more of a diatribe against a mostly unnamed group of Lincoln scholars than a real historical analysis. His wild assertions – for example, that Lincoln held 'lifelong white supremacist views' – don't help his argument."<ref>{{cite news |last=Ewers |first=Justin |date=January 14, 2007 |title=Memorializing Lincoln |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/12/AR2007011200119_2.html}}</ref> ''Publishers Weekly'' described this as a "laughable screed," in which DiLorenzo "charges that most scholars of the Civil War are part of a 'Lincoln cult';" he particularly attacks scholar ], characterizing him and others as "cover-up artists" and "propagandists".<ref name=":1">{{cite web |date=2006-08-07 |title=Nonfiction Book Review: Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe by Thomas J. DiLorenzo |url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-307-33841-9 |access-date=2014-08-13 |website=] |publisher=}}</ref>
* '']'' (2003). Random House LLC, ISBN 9780761536413. {{OCLC|716369332}}

* ''From Pathology to Politics: Public Health in America'', with Thomas T. Bennett, (2000). Transaction Publishers, ISBN 0765800233. {{OCLC|43978653}}
Writing for the Mises Institute, David Gordon summarises DiLorenzo's thesis: that Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery to new states because black labor would compete with white labor; that Lincoln hoped that all blacks would eventually be deported to Africa in order that white laborers could have more work. According to Gordon, DiLorenzo states that Lincoln supported emancipation of slaves only as a wartime expedient to help defeat the South.<ref>David Gordon review of ''Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe'', ''Mises Review'', Vol. 13, No. 2, February 2007.</ref>
* ''The Food and Drink Police: America's Nannies, Busybodies, and Petty Tyrants'' with James T. Bennett, (1998). Transaction Publishers, ISBN 9781560003854. {{OCLC|60213705}}

* ''CancerScam: The Diversion of Federal Cancer Funds for Politics'', with James T. Bennett, (1997). Transaction Publishers, ISBN 9781560003342. {{OCLC|59624748}}
In a 2009 review of three newly published books on Lincoln, historian Brian Dirck linked the earlier work of Thomas DiLorenzo with that of ], another critic of Lincoln. He wrote that "Few Civil War scholars take Bennett and DiLorenzo seriously, pointing to their narrow political agenda and faulty research."<ref>, ''Civil War History,'' September 2009, Vol. 55, No. 3; pp. 382–385</ref>
* ''Underground government: the off-budget public sector'', with James T. Bennett, (1983), ], ISBN 9780932790378. {{OCLC|9281695}}

DiLorenzo's 2008 book ''Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and What It Means for Americans Today'' expands on DiLorenzo's libertarian, small government views and details ideological differences between "Hamiltonians" and "Jeffersonians" in the role of the central government.<ref>{{Cite book |last=DiLorenzo |first=Thomas J. |title=Hamilton's curse: how Jefferson's archenemy betrayed the American revolution – and what it means for Americans today |date=2008 |publisher=Three Rivers Press |isbn=978-0307382856 |location=New York |oclc=316835983}}</ref>{{Third-party inline|date=October 2023|reason=] #1 #2 #4}}

== League of the South involvement ==
In 2009, ] historian Carl R Weinberg wrote in the magazine of the ] that "DiLorenzo has also allied himself with the neo-Confederate League of the South, which shares his view that slavery had little to do with the Civil War and that 'big government' is the root of all evil."<ref name="Weinberg 2009 pp. 64–64">{{cite journal | last=Weinberg | first=C. R. | title=Does Lincoln Still Matter? | journal=OAH Magazine of History | publisher=Oxford University Press (OUP) | volume=23 | issue=1 | date=1 January 2009 | issn=0882-228X | doi=10.1093/maghis/23.1.64 | pages=64}}</ref>

Congressman ] criticized DiLorenzo for his associations with the group when DiLorenzo testified before the ] at the request of former U.S. Congressman ] in 2011.<ref name="Walker">Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). . '']''.</ref><ref>Sullivan, Andy (February 9, 2011). Reuters</ref><ref>Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). The ''Baltimore Sun''</ref> '']'' columnist ] noted that the League of the South had listed DiLorenzo on its Web site as an "affiliated scholar" as recently as 2008.<ref name="Milbank">{{cite news|last=Milbank|first=Dana| author-link=Dana Milbank |title=Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/09/AR2011020905879.html|access-date=24 November 2013|newspaper=]|date=February 9, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://lsinstitute.org/ |title=League of the South Institute for the Study of Southern History and Culture |access-date=2010-01-31 |url-status=bot: unknown |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071029165040/http://lsinstitute.org/ |archive-date=October 29, 2007 }}</ref> Milbank also wrote that DiLorenzo had in 2010 told a secessionist Web site, DumpDC, that "secession is not only possible but necessary if any part of America is ever to be considered 'the land of the free' in any meaningful sense".<ref name="Milbank" />

DiLorenzo denied any affiliation with the group, telling a '']'' reporter that "I don't endorse what they say and do any more than I endorse what Congress says and does because I spoke at a hearing on Wednesday."{{citation needed|date=May 2018}} An investigation was subsequently conducted by his employer, but no action was taken.<ref name="Burris">Burris, Joe (February 14, 2011). " The ''Baltimore Sun''</ref> In a ] column, he described his association with the League as limited to "a few lectures on the economics of the ]" he gave to The League of the South Institute about thirteen years ago.<ref name="Lewrockwell.com">, ''Lewrockwell.com'', February 11, 2011</ref> In a 2005 LewRockwell.com article, DiLorenzo addressed concerns against the League of the South's core beliefs statement stating that neoconservative viewpoints were at odds with the League of the South's statement, leading to vitriol. Further, DiLorenzo argues that the current Republican party is descended, not from the small-government views of Jefferson, but rather from the ideals of the Hamiltonian ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Why They Hate Tom Woods |url=https://www.lewrockwell.com/2005/02/thomas-dilorenzo/why-they-hate-tom-woods/ |access-date=2022-11-01 |website=LewRockwell |language=en}}</ref>

==Publications==
DiLorenzo has authored several books, including:<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.loyola.edu/webtrans/aca/sellingertest/profile.html?profile=2009053&directory=1487196|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130514100639/http://www.loyola.edu/webtrans/aca/sellingertest/profile.html?profile=2009053&directory=1487196|title=Loyola University Maryland, listing of representative publications for Dr. Thomas J. Di Lorenzo|archive-date=May 14, 2013}}</ref>
* ''The Politically Incorrect Guide to Economics (2022) Regnery Publishing, {{ISBN|978-1684512980}}.
* ''The Problem with Lincoln'' (2020) ], {{ISBN|978-1684510184}}
* ''The Problem with Socialism'' (2016) ], {{ISBN|978-1621575894}}.
* ''Organized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About Government'' (2012). ], {{ISBN|978-1610162562}}. {{OCLC|815625479}}
* ''Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution – and What It Means for Americans Today'' (2009). Random House, {{ISBN|978-0307382856}}. {{OCLC|593712801}}
* '']'' (2006). Random House, {{ISBN|978-0307338419}}. {{OCLC|67727894}}
* ''How Capitalism Saved America: The Untold History of Our Country, From the Pilgrims to the Present'' (2004). Random House, {{ISBN|9780761525264}}. {{OCLC|834478638|56895316}}
* '']'' (2003). Random House, {{ISBN|978-0761536413}}. {{OCLC|716369332}}
* ''From Pathology to Politics: Public Health in America'', with James T. Bennett, (2000). Transaction Publishers, {{ISBN|0765800233}}. {{OCLC|43978653}}
* ''The Food and Drink Police: America's Nannies, Busybodies, and Petty Tyrants'' with James T. Bennett, (1998). Transaction Publishers, {{ISBN|978-1560003854}}. {{OCLC|60213705}}
* ''CancerScam: The Diversion of Federal Cancer Funds for Politics'', with James T. Bennett, (1997). Transaction Publishers, {{ISBN|978-1560003342}}. {{OCLC|59624748}}
* ''Underground government: the off-budget public sector'', with James T. Bennett, (1983), ], {{ISBN|978-0932790378}}. {{OCLC|9281695}}


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{reflist|colwidth=30em}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{commons}} {{commons}}
* Lectures by DiLorenzo at the ]. * Lectures by DiLorenzo at the ].
* for ] * for ]
* {{C-SPAN|25852}}
* for ]
* by ]
* in the " ]."
*
*
* {{cite web |author= Uhlmann, Michael M., Krannawitter, Thomas L. |title=Father Abraham Under Fire Again |url=http://www.claremont.org/publications/precepts/id.178/precept_detail.asp |work=May 20, 2002 |publisher=Claremont Institute}}
* {{cite web |author= Krannawitter, Thomas L. |title=Dishonest About Abe |url=http://www.claremont.org/writings/crb/Spring2002/krannawitter.html |work=January 31, 2009 |publisher=Claremont Institute |quote= A review of ''The Real Lincoln''}}


{{Austrian economists}} {{Austrian economists}}


{{Authority control|VIAF=3845771}} {{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:DiLorenzo, Thomas}}
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ] -->
| NAME =Dilorenzo, Thomas James
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = economist
| DATE OF BIRTH =1954-08-08
| PLACE OF BIRTH =
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dilorenzo, Thomas}}
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 18:14, 11 November 2024

American economist (born 1954)
This biography of a living person relies too much on references to primary sources. Please help by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous or harmful.
Find sources: "Thomas DiLorenzo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Thomas DiLorenzo
DiLorenzo in October 2017
Born (1954-08-08) August 8, 1954 (age 70)
NationalityAmerican
Academic career
FieldEconomic history
School or
tradition		Austrian School
InfluencesHenry Hazlitt, John T. Flynn

Thomas James DiLorenzo (/diləˈrɛnzoʊ/; born August 8, 1954) is an American author and former university economics professor who is the President of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He has written books denouncing President Abraham Lincoln and is well known among economists for his work chronicling the history of antitrust policy in the United States.

He is a research fellow at The Independent Institute, Board of Advisors member at CFACT, and an associate of the Abbeville Institute. He identifies with the Austrian School of economics. He has spoken in favor of secession and has been described as an ally of, or part of, the neo-Confederate movement.

Life and work

Thomas James DiLorenzo grew up in western Pennsylvania, descended from Italian immigrants. In an essay he attributed his individualism to playing sports. He began to study libertarianism in college.

He has a BA in Economics from Westminster College in Pennsylvania. He holds a PhD in Economics from Virginia Tech.

DiLorenzo has taught at the State University of New York at Buffalo, George Mason University, and the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.

He is a former adjunct fellow of the Center for the Study of American Business at Washington University in St. Louis. From 1992 to 2020, he was a professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland Sellinger School of Business. As of 2020, DiLorenzo was no longer listed as active faculty at Loyola University, and instead as a professor emeritus. He is a research fellow at the Independent Institute.

DiLorenzo is a speaker at Mises Institute events and teaches some of its online courses. He writes for the blog LewRockwell.com. He was listed as an affiliated scholar though 2009 of the Institute for the Study of Southern Culture, which is run by the League of the South, a neo-Confederate group. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) in 2004 described DiLorenzo as one of 10 key ideologues in the neo-Confederate movement.

Views

This article is part of a series on
Conservatism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Intellectuals
Politicians
Jurists
Commentators
Activists
Literature
Concerns
PartiesActive

Defunct

Think tanks
Media

Newspapers

Journals

TV channels

Websites

Other

Other organizations

Economics

Gun rights

Identity politics

Nativist

Religion

Watchdog groups

Youth/student groups

Miscellaneous

Other

Movements
Related

DiLorenzo writes about what he calls "the myth of Lincoln" in American history and politics. He has said, "Lincoln is on record time after time rejecting the idea of racial equality. But whenever anyone brings this up, the Lincoln partisans go to the extreme to smear the bearer of bad news." DiLorenzo has spoken out in favor of the secession of the Confederate States of America, defending the right of these states to secede from an abolitionist perspective. He has described himself as a historical revisionist. He has called the American Civil War the "War for Southern Independence".

DiLorenzo is critical of Alexander Hamilton's financial views, the concept of "implied powers" in the Constitution, the existence of a federal bank, and the use of Keynesian economics to increase the national debt.

DiLorenzo is critical of neoconservatism and military interventionism.

DiLorenzo is critical of the Sherman Act, noting that "the Sherman Act was never intended to protect competition. It was a blatantly protectionist act designed to shield smaller and less efficient businesses from their larger competitors. There never was a golden age of antitrust."

Books

DiLorenzo has written extensively on Abraham Lincoln. According to one historian, "Most historians are inclined to dismiss DiLorenzo as a crackpot. But... his books generally sell better than those of academic 'Lincolnologists' and... views help lay the foundation for conservative political action today", historian David Blight has recently suggested that we ignore these writings at our peril."

DiLorenzo's book The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War is a critical biography published in 2002. Writing for The Daily Beast, Rich Lowry described DiLorenzo's technique in this book as the following: "His scholarship, such as it is, consists of rummaging through the record for anything he can find to damn Lincoln, stripping it of any nuance or context, and piling on pejorative adjectives. In DiLorenzo, the Lincoln-haters have found a champion with the judiciousness and the temperament they deserve."

In a review published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, David Gordon described DiLorenzo's thesis: Lincoln was a "white supremacist" with no principled interest in abolishing slavery, and believed in a strong central government that imposed high tariffs and a nationalized banking system. He attributes the South's secession to Lincoln's economic policies rather than a desire to preserve slavery. Gordon quotes DiLorenzo: "slavery was already in sharp decline in the border states and the upper South generally, mostly for economic reasons".

Reviewing for The Independent Review, the magazine of The Independent Institute, a think tank associated with DiLorenzo, Richard M. Gamble of Palm Beach Atlantic University said that the book "manages to raise fresh and morally probing questions" and that DiLorenzo "writes primarily not as a defender of the Old South and its institutions, culture, and traditions, but as a libertarian enemy of the Leviathan state" but bemoans that DiLorenzo was "careless" in his handling of sources and despite his "evident courage and ability", his execution was lacking. Gamble concludes that the book is a "travesty of historical method and documentation". He said the book was plagued by a "labyrinth of errors", and that DiLorenzo has "earned the... ridicule of his critics."

In a review for the Claremont Institute, historian Ken Masugi writes that "DiLorenzo adopts as his own the fundamental mistake of leftist multi-culturalist historians: confusing the issue of race with the much more fundamental one, which was slavery." He noted that in Illinois "the anti-slavery forces actually joined with racists to keep their state free of slavery, and also free of blacks." Masugi called DiLorenzo's work "shabby" and stated that DiLorenzo's treatment of Lincoln was "feckless" and that the book is "truly awful". In 2002, DiLorenzo debated Claremont Institute fellow professor Harry V. Jaffa on the merits of Abraham Lincoln's statesmanship before and during the Civil War.

DiLorenzo's book, Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe (2007), continues his explorations begun in The Real Lincoln. Reviews in The Washington Post and Publishers Weekly both stated that the book seemed directed at unnamed scholars who had praised Lincoln's contributions. Justin Ewers criticized DiLorenzo, saying this book "is more of a diatribe against a mostly unnamed group of Lincoln scholars than a real historical analysis. His wild assertions – for example, that Lincoln held 'lifelong white supremacist views' – don't help his argument." Publishers Weekly described this as a "laughable screed," in which DiLorenzo "charges that most scholars of the Civil War are part of a 'Lincoln cult';" he particularly attacks scholar Eric Foner, characterizing him and others as "cover-up artists" and "propagandists".

Writing for the Mises Institute, David Gordon summarises DiLorenzo's thesis: that Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery to new states because black labor would compete with white labor; that Lincoln hoped that all blacks would eventually be deported to Africa in order that white laborers could have more work. According to Gordon, DiLorenzo states that Lincoln supported emancipation of slaves only as a wartime expedient to help defeat the South.

In a 2009 review of three newly published books on Lincoln, historian Brian Dirck linked the earlier work of Thomas DiLorenzo with that of Lerone Bennett, another critic of Lincoln. He wrote that "Few Civil War scholars take Bennett and DiLorenzo seriously, pointing to their narrow political agenda and faulty research."

DiLorenzo's 2008 book Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution--and What It Means for Americans Today expands on DiLorenzo's libertarian, small government views and details ideological differences between "Hamiltonians" and "Jeffersonians" in the role of the central government.

League of the South involvement

In 2009, Indiana University historian Carl R Weinberg wrote in the magazine of the Organization of American Historians that "DiLorenzo has also allied himself with the neo-Confederate League of the South, which shares his view that slavery had little to do with the Civil War and that 'big government' is the root of all evil."

Congressman Lacy Clay criticized DiLorenzo for his associations with the group when DiLorenzo testified before the House Financial Services Committee at the request of former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul in 2011. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank noted that the League of the South had listed DiLorenzo on its Web site as an "affiliated scholar" as recently as 2008. Milbank also wrote that DiLorenzo had in 2010 told a secessionist Web site, DumpDC, that "secession is not only possible but necessary if any part of America is ever to be considered 'the land of the free' in any meaningful sense".

DiLorenzo denied any affiliation with the group, telling a Baltimore Sun reporter that "I don't endorse what they say and do any more than I endorse what Congress says and does because I spoke at a hearing on Wednesday." An investigation was subsequently conducted by his employer, but no action was taken. In a LewRockwell.com column, he described his association with the League as limited to "a few lectures on the economics of the Civil War" he gave to The League of the South Institute about thirteen years ago. In a 2005 LewRockwell.com article, DiLorenzo addressed concerns against the League of the South's core beliefs statement stating that neoconservative viewpoints were at odds with the League of the South's statement, leading to vitriol. Further, DiLorenzo argues that the current Republican party is descended, not from the small-government views of Jefferson, but rather from the ideals of the Hamiltonian Federalist Party.

Publications

DiLorenzo has authored several books, including:

References

  1. Thomas DiLorenzo, The New Deal Debunked (again), Mises Daily, September 27, 2004.
  2. ^ "Nonfiction Book Review: Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe by Thomas J. DiLorenzo". Publishers Weekly. 2006-08-07. Retrieved 2014-08-13.
  3. ^ "The Joseph A. Sellinger, S.J., School of Business and Management – Loyola University Maryland – Acalog ACMS™". catalogue.loyola.edu. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  4. Barr, John McKee (2014). Loathing Lincoln: An American Tradition from the Civil War to the Present. United States: LSU Press. ISBN 9780807153857.
  5. "Tom DiLorenzo on Antitrust, Abe Lincoln, and the Future of the Austrian School | Mises Institute". mises.org. 2024-03-08. Retrieved 2024-09-30.
  6. Thomas DiLorenzo profile at The Independent Institute website, accessed November 22, 2013.
  7. "CFACT Board of Advisors". Archived from the original on 2022-03-05. Retrieved 2022-03-05.
  8. Abbeville Institute associates list Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine, accessed November 22, 2013.
  9. Interview with Thomas DiLorenzo Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine at Ludwig von Mises Institute website, August 16, 2010.
  10. ^ Weinberg, C. R. (1 January 2009). "Does Lincoln Still Matter?". OAH Magazine of History. 23 (1). Oxford University Press (OUP): 64. doi:10.1093/maghis/23.1.64. ISSN 0882-228X.
  11. ^ Milbank, Dana (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul's economic Rx: a Southern secessionist". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
  12. ^ Beirich, Heidi; Potok, Mark (December 21, 2004). "The Ideologues". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  13. DiLorenzo, Thomas, "The Evil of Politics", LewRockwell.com, 25 December 2002.
  14. Anthony Wile, "Interview with Thomas James DiLorenzo on Abraham Lincoln, U.S. Authoritarianism and Manipulated History", The Daily Bell, 16 May 2010, published by High Alert Capital Partners.
  15. "Sellinger School of Business Profile of Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo". Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University Maryland. 2009. Archived from the original on 2013-05-14. Retrieved 2015-02-27.
  16. ^ Thomas J. Dilorenzo profile, Contemporary Authors, January 1, 2005
  17. Thomas J. DiLorenoz, Book Review : The Public's Business: The Politics and Practices of Government Corporations, Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 1981, 117–119
  18. James T. Bennett and Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "Poverty, Politics, and Jurisprudence: Illegalities at the Legal Services Corporation", Policy Analysis No. 49, Cato Institute, February 26, 1985.
  19. Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "The subjectivist roots of James Buchanan's economics", The Review of Austrian Economics, Volume 4, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 180–195.
  20. Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Suburban Legends: Why "Smart Growth" Is Not So Smart Archived 2013-12-12 at the Wayback Machine, Washington University in St. Louis Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, "Contemporary Issues", Series 97, November 1999.
  21. "Thomas J. DiLorenzo". The Independent Institute. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  22. Thomas DiLorenzo profile Archived 2013-12-11 at the Wayback Machine, at the Ludwig von Mises Institute website, accessed November 22, 2013.
  23. Archive of DiLorenzo commentary for LewRockwell.com.
  24. Beirich, Heidi (February 9, 2011). "Ron Paul Invites Neo-Confederate Witness to Testify in Congress". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  25. Reichman, Henry (2019). The Future of Academic Freedom. United States: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 116. ISBN 9781421428598.
  26. Thomas DiLorenzo, "Confronting the Lincoln Cult,", Mises Daily, 3 June 2002]
  27. Abraham Lincoln Online: Speeches and Writing. "Letter to Henry L. Pierce and others". Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  28. Thomas DiLorenzo, "An Abolitionist Defends the South,", LewRockwell.com, October 20, 2004].
  29. Kirchick, James (2008-01-08). "Angry White Man". The New Republic. ISSN 0028-6583. Retrieved 2023-10-23.
  30. Dilorenzo, Thomas J. (2009). Hamilton's Curse: How Jefferson's Arch Enemy Betrayed the American Revolution – and What It Means for Americans Today. Crown Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0307382856.
  31. "Neocons Are Unhinged".
  32. "The Antitrust Economists' Paradox | Mises Institute". mises.org. 1991-02-24. Retrieved 2024-09-30.
  33. Thomas DiLorenzo, The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, Random House LLC, 2002, ISBN 978-0307559388.
  34. Lowry, Rich (2013-06-17). "The Rancid Abraham Lincoln–Haters of the Libertarian Right". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 2023-06-06.
  35. David Gordon review of Thomas J. DiLorenzo, "The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War" Archived 2014-09-14 at the Wayback Machine, The Mises Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, February 2002.
  36. Gamble, Richard M. "The Real Lincoln: Book review" The Independent Review .
  37. Masugi, Ken. "The Unreal Lincoln". Claremont Institute. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  38. Ken Masugi is an academic in the fields of American history and multiculturalism at Johns Hopkins University and the Claremont Institute. See: "Ken Masugi Faculty bio". Johns Hopkins University. Archived from the original on 27 November 2014. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  39. Harry V. Jaffa; Thomas J. DiLorenzo (May 7, 2002). "The Real Abraham Lincoln: A Debate". Events. The Independent Institute.
  40. Thomas DiLorenzo, Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe, Random House LLC, 2007, ISBN 030749652X
  41. Ewers, Justin (January 14, 2007). "Memorializing Lincoln". The Washington Post.
  42. David Gordon review of Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe, Mises Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, February 2007.
  43. Dirck, Brian. Review: "Father Abraham: Lincoln's Relentless Struggle to End Slavery, and: Act of Justice: Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation and the Law of War, and: Lincoln and Freedom: Slavery, Emancipation, and the Thirteenth Amendment (review)", Civil War History, September 2009, Vol. 55, No. 3; pp. 382–385
  44. DiLorenzo, Thomas J. (2008). Hamilton's curse: how Jefferson's archenemy betrayed the American revolution – and what it means for Americans today. New York: Three Rivers Press. ISBN 978-0307382856. OCLC 316835983.
  45. Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group". The Baltimore Sun.
  46. Sullivan, Andy (February 9, 2011). "Paul calls Fed's Bernanke "cocky" in House hearing." Reuters
  47. Walker, Childs (February 11, 2011). "Loyola professor faces questions about ties to pro-secession group." The Baltimore Sun
  48. "League of the South Institute for the Study of Southern History and Culture". Archived from the original on October 29, 2007. Retrieved 2010-01-31.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  49. Burris, Joe (February 14, 2011). "Loyola investigating whether professor has ties to hate group." The Baltimore Sun
  50. "My Associations with Liars, Bigots, and Murderers", Lewrockwell.com, February 11, 2011
  51. "Why They Hate Tom Woods". LewRockwell. Retrieved 2022-11-01.
  52. "Loyola University Maryland, listing of representative publications for Dr. Thomas J. Di Lorenzo". Archived from the original on May 14, 2013.

External links

Austrian school economics
Influences
Founders
Other contributors
See also
Categories: