| Revision as of 03:45, 18 March 2014 editAndreJustAndre (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,392 edits →Re: Gospel of Matthew← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:01, 15 July 2020 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers380,652 edits →Precious anniversary: 7 | ||
| (136 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{retired|date=January 26, 2015}} | |||
| {{Long Wikibreak|]| when I feel recharged enough to resume editing.}} | |||
| == Archives == | |||
| == Arbitration clarification request closed == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hi Ignocrates, just letting you know that I've ] in which you were named as a party. For the Arbitration Committee, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 10:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Post-AE block future plans == | |||
| ] | |||
| @{{u|Chillum}}, please restore my deleted user page but leave me blocked for now. I'm having a hard time getting past what {{u|HJ_Mitchell|Harry}} did to me, so I'm not ready to return to editing. I'm taking a year off, and I will decide sometime next year to either return to editing on some different categories or just say the hell with it. See you in 2016. ] (]) 15:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Okay, done. ] 16:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :I also put a clarification in your block log to make it more clear that the arbcom block is expired and the current block is voluntary. I neglected to make that clear in the previous block log. ] 16:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Workpages == | |||
| ::Thanks for clarifying in the log that the indef block is voluntary. ] (]) 19:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| ] | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} --] (]) 06:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Please leave your posts to my talk page below this line. Thank you. --> | |||
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
| == Re: Gospel of Matthew == | |||
| The discussion does seem to have died down. I noticed that the version in the article is missing the "Many scholars have held..." bit, even though it seemed like everyone in the mediation supported that line. I'm a little uncomfortable about closing the mediation on that note since it sort of looks like we are not giving those proceedings justice here. ''']'''] 02:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Considering the intensity of opposition to doing anything at the beginning of mediation, I think it went extraordinarily well. Most of the involved editors don't really support the solution - they are indicating that by their silence - but these are veteran editors who realize there is a greater good being done here. I would take to heart ]'s famous quote that "]" and leave it at that. In any case, I am off for a long break and I won't be checking my talk page. ] (]) 03:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Wow, I just read over ], such a struggle over two sentences in an entire article. I'm glad that I don't edit in such contentious areas like early Christianity. It seemed like 1/3 of the way through, most editors agreed on a version, then the mediation went to hell (veered off-topic), then multiple versions were tweaked without any getting majority support. I hope you're enjoying your break. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 01:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :I think the tiny compromise we worked out was the best outcome that could be achieved under the circumstances. The mediator was very quick to pick up on the real problem, which is intractable. Ret.Prof needs to stay off this article, period. Otherwise, his deficiencies as an editor will continue to be used as straw-man reasons to maintain the ''status quo'' of suppressing the minority view that there was an original ] of some sort which became associated by tradition with ]. Believe me, there are days when I'm ready to file an arbitration case and pull this problem out by the roots. Then I quickly come to my senses and realize it's not worth the personal sacrifice that would require. See ya. ] (]) 18:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please feel free to take a break. I am going to leave the mediation open and see if people return to it; Athenekos has left a proposal there and people can comment on it there. Many of the participants in this mediation were combative and troublesome, but naming names really isn't very productive, and Ret. Prof was certainly not the one who was most disruptive. Let's go forward to building consensus instead of trying to find the culprit. ''']'''] 03:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:01, 15 July 2020
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages as of January 26, 2015.Arbitration clarification request closed
Hi Ignocrates, just letting you know that I've archived an arbitration clarification request in which you were named as a party. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Post-AE block future plans
@Chillum, please restore my deleted user page but leave me blocked for now. I'm having a hard time getting past what Harry did to me, so I'm not ready to return to editing. I'm taking a year off, and I will decide sometime next year to either return to editing on some different categories or just say the hell with it. See you in 2016. Ignocrates (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, done. Chillum 16:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I also put a clarification in your block log to make it more clear that the arbcom block is expired and the current block is voluntary. I neglected to make that clear in the previous block log. Chillum 16:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying in the log that the indef block is voluntary. Ignocrates (talk) 19:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|