Revision as of 09:24, 18 March 2014 editJgera5 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,274 edits →LEAVE ME ALONE!: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:24, 1 November 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots531,711 edits Notification that File:Doe B at the 2013 BET Hip Hop Awards.jpg is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=26 September 2021}} | |||
{{Rollback|icon_nr=3}} | {{Rollback|icon_nr=3}} | ||
{{Autopatrolled topicon|icon_nr=2}} | {{Autopatrolled topicon|icon_nr=2}} | ||
Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
{{Reviewer topicon|icon_nr=0}} | {{Reviewer topicon|icon_nr=0}} | ||
{{message}} | {{message}} | ||
{{Notice | {{Notice | ||
|'''In order to keep a conversation together rather than spread over multiple talk pages, if you leave me a message here, I will respond here.}} | |'''In order to keep a conversation together, rather than spread over multiple talk pages, if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. I will also always ] you along with my responses.}} | ||
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no| | |||
{{archive box collapsible| | |||
* ]<br /> | * ]<br /> | ||
* ]<br /> | * ]<br /> | ||
* ]<br /> | * ]<br /> | ||
* ]<br /> | * ]<br /> | ||
* ] | * ]<br /> | ||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
* ] | |||
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} | |||
}} is it possible to contact you to create a wiki page for me | |||
== WWE: Uncaged VIII == | |||
WWE: Uncaged VIII ARTICLE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DELETED ITS A GOOD READ.?. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== 100,000th edit! == | |||
{| style="background:#fdffe7; border:1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| style="font-size:x-large; padding:3px 3px 0; height:1.5em;"| '''100,000th edit award''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Let me be the first to congratulate you on your 100,000th edit! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your bling page! or you could choose to display the {{tlx|User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thanks for all your work at the 'pedia! Cheers, — ]|] 04:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
: {{ping|MarnetteD}} Well thanks for the kind message, I didn't think anyone would notice lol. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 05:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
::Congrats! I will see you in that club in 3000 edits :-). - ''''']]''''' 13:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
::: {{ping|Galatz}} You got this Galatz, you're almost there lol. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 18:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::haha thanks...10 years in the making - ''''']]''''' 19:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
::You are most welcome S. Cheers. ]|] 16:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::Belated congrats. Nice to see that star I designed going to a nice home. ] ] 00:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== soulja boy article citations == | |||
sorry about the earlier edit, added in a more comprehensive version with proper citations. | |||
] (]) 10:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Cashlizard | |||
: {{ping |CashLizard}} Thank you for doing that :) <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 21:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Your comment to me == | |||
Relax lol. It was a good edition I just didn’t have time to source at that precise moment... <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|Hoglundan}} I am very relaxed tbh. Refer to ], ] and ]. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 21:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
== r == | |||
Why did you revert me edit to Bill Goldberg? ] (]) 12:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|Jimmyy68}} When you add or change content on Misplaced Pages you need to cite a reliable source for you change. Please click all the blue links in the message I sent you. Outside of that I feel no reason to say the exact match time, it is trivial. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 18:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Drake Maverick == | |||
You know, in your haste to put Maverick back as "other personnel", you put Elias back as 24/7 Champion - yet you said ''I'' put in incorrect information. | |||
Gotta watch before you leap, sir. | |||
] ] 00:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|Vjmlhds}} This moving of Maverick was directly against consensus from the article talk page. You already got a final warning since you returned, if I wanted ANI is that way, but I am just not active enough rn to bother. There was consensus. I don't know how winning the joke 24/7HardcoreIronmanHeavyweight championship a few more times means anything. You labeled Maverick as a 205 wrestler and that is not correct. Sorry about my mistake with Elias, did not see that until now. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ] (]) 02:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC) == | |||
Hello what is a redlik that you mention in my talk page | |||
: {{ping|Andrewboricua787407}} See ] There are ] and ]. You should not remove red links unless you know that, that person or thing is not and will not ever be notable. Also you only need to sign your posts at the end of your posts on ] pages. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 08:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Pat buck info == | |||
https://www.mandatory.com/wrestlezone/news/1117371-get-to-know-guest-wwe-pc-coach-pat-buck | |||
https://thepopbreak.com/2019/04/03/pat-buck-on-the-buzz-killer-the-future-of-wrestling-the-duality-of-being-a-promoter-a-wrestler/# | |||
https://rajah.com/node/notes-impacts-code-red-event-two-new-producers-former-nxt-star-spotted | |||
I would of quoted all of this but don’t know how, if you can help. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|ChipDouglas820}} Thanks for the effort I do appreciate it! A few things to link you to. First would be ] and ]. Also of note, Mandatory and Rajah are known as unreliable sources, please only use reliable sources like the ones found at ]. All content needs to have a citation, the part I was more concerned about was the claim that he produced the match, is their a reliable source that you can find that information on? <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 08:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Could you help me update my page? I can pay for it. ] (]) 15:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Sabu and Reno Scum== | |||
Hey, Static. I notice that on Sabu's page, you've given him the sub-heading "Second return to Impact, 2019-present" or words to that effect with a source indicating Impact are still going to use Sabu in future. Would you suggest that means Sabu should be added back to Impact's roster, or would you advise against it? | |||
] (]) 08:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|SkylerLovefist}} I was iffy on it, only because "plans can change". Maybe wait till he returns, but I wouldn't revert it if you wanted to add him back. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 03:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Since he's returned at today's taping, I'll add him back, I'll use both sources. Thanks. | |||
While I'm at it, reports coming out from the tapings indicate Reno Scum have formalised their alliance with Ace Austin, whom they've been involved in an ongoing storyline with, along with Eddie Edwards. While no formal news of a contract has broken, they've been used a lot since Cali Combat and appear to being used going forward. Too Synth at this stage, or are they fair to be added too? ] (]) 03:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|SkylerLovefist}} Oh cool that's awesome to hear, saves us the headache worrying about that. As for Reno I would wait for 1) roster profile 2) source confirming signing or 3) them being used at tapings outside of California/Nevada. They seem to only use them when it's convenient when they're touring in the area. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 07:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Fair call. Perhaps if they appear at the next tapings, still allied with Ace?] (]) 08:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|SkylerLovefist}} Yeah that would seem okay, as long as the taping isn't in Nevada/California, where Reno Scum is from lol. Also I just . You could add ] and ] to the backstage section as producers based off this since they have worked previous tapings as producers as well. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 23:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Yeah, the next tapings are in Canada, so pretty far from that area. Lol. I'll chuck Paul and Chris in when I have the chance. | |||
] (]) 01:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks, editing tables at all is a nightmare on my browser. I just wish Impact frequently updated their roster page so everyone didn't have to always play the wait/guess game. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 03:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Nikki cross == | |||
Nikki cross does Indeed perform under the smack down brand as she is currently smackdown tag champ with alexa bliss you should watch it and then you'll see ] (]) 19:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|Kintobor86}} You must be misunderstanding something. They are not the ]. That title is held by The New Day. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
if you check the women's division also have tag champs alexa bliss and nikki cross are champs in their first reign <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> | |||
: {{ping|Kintobor86}} The women's tag team championships are dual brand championships. The champions can appear on both brands. Bliss and Cross are still Raw superstars though. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 22:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Backlog | |||
Instead of reaching a magic '''300''' as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google. | |||
;Coordinator | |||
A proposal is taking place ] to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR. | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
'']'', a 2008 essay by long since retired {{U|Ballonman}}, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading. | |||
;Deletion tags | |||
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification. | |||
;Paid editing | |||
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to ] if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts. | |||
;Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion | |||
*Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for ]. | |||
*''Blank-and-Redirect'' is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed. | |||
;Not English | |||
*A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with ]. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it. | |||
;Tools | |||
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs. | |||
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See ], It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools. | |||
Assessment: The script at ] makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done. | |||
{{noping|DannyS712 bot III}} is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its . | |||
<small>Go ] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.</small> | |||
</div> | |||
] (]) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=914408718 --> | |||
== Braun Strowman == | |||
When I edited the weight of #REDIRECT ] I did cite a reliable source, a recent interview in which Adam Scherr (Braun Strowman) said that his weight was 345-350 lbs, all you had to do was go to that video at the point of the video which I specified and hear it. So you're wrong. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
But since you want a 'billed' weight, I added the correct billed weight for Braun Strowman. 385lbs, not 340lbs. I also provided a reliable source for it. So don't send me another message. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|Vannyvis55}} I am clearly not "wrong", the section of the infobox does say billed weight. I saw someone else reverted it. Weird that they announced him at 385 when they said he was 340 in June. I have my doubts that his weight fluctuates that much. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 12:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
Strowman's billed weight has always been 385lbs. Look at wwe.com, watch RAW every Monday night, they say 385lbs. And yes his weight does flucuate, Strowman has comfirmed that his own weight fluctuates 10-15bs per DAY (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LISn6eOwlIw) (Point 4:25). Super ShowDown was in June, three months ago, and the only show in which they said he was 340. Even if his weight was 340lbs then, it is possible for him to gain 45 lbs during that time period of three months. It doesn't matter if you 'have doubts'. It's a fact. With that being said, I have edited the page again. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|Vannyvis55}} A few comments on your editing. 1) I sent you a message to teach you how to sign your posts on talk pages, please do that. 2) Even if you think you are right, do not ever ], it is the quickest way to a block. As for this dispute, I saw the video and they clearly do announce him as 385 still so I will leave it alone. In the future, if someone reverts you, (especially if two people do!) discuss on the article talk page and reach consensus before restoring your preferred version. Even if you are "right" it is still edit warring.<u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 14:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I initially reverted Vannyvis55's edit since the channel is not verified. However I've restored it to their version, for now. Someone need to update it with a video from a verified source. - ] (]) 14:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::: {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}} We might as well use the wwe.com profile as the source since it says the same thing as the YouTube video. I was the one who originally changed it to 340 due to the Super ShowDown video, but it appears they reverted back to the heavier weight. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 15:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::I don't have a problem. If I remember correctly, you and someone else agreed upon that recent sources are better. Since I kinda agreed to it, I was enforcing . We can always change it back to WWE.com official profile since Brawn is still associated with the company and his profile is likely up-to-date. - ] (]) 16:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::: {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}} What's sad is that don't really update their website listings. That is the only reason I jumped to make the 340 change when I saw it updated somewhere else. For example, Gulak has apparently been and I just watched a clip from Extreme Rules (he is billed at 202), but he is still 193 on wwe.com and on our article for him. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 17:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::::Yeah, that's kinda problematic. Do you want me to re add the YT video, since it is from August 26? I mean both the WWE source and the YT video. - ] (]) 17:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I feel like leaving the YouTube ref out is best since it is a copy vio of WWE television. It was good as proof, but we now know that the .com is accurate to what they say on their show. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 19:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Agreed. - ] (]) 07:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Omega == | |||
Hi there, STATicVapor! I apologize for not explicitly referencing the specific MOS guidelines in my edit summary. | |||
Per ] (i.e. {{tq|When an abbreviation will be used in an article, first introduce it using the full expression . . .}}), I believe if the company name is referenced repeatedly in the lead section, then it is important to annotate the abbreviation. However, if the first introduction of the name is its only presence in the lead, then I personally believe the abbreviation should wait until the body because it will be even more confusing to introduce a section specifically devoted to AEW and not introduce the abbreviation (e.g. "''Omega signed with All Elite Wrestling. He made his debut for AEW on . . .''"). I believe this is in line with ] (i.e. {{tq|Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article . . .}}) in that an abbreviation is overly specific for only one mention in the lead. | |||
] references abbreviations in the first sentence of the article, but it illustrates the same scenario where the abbreviation is utilized multiple times in the lead. | |||
That said, there's not a definitive guideline, so I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on this. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|KyleJoan}} Make sense to me thanks for the links :). I was honestly really just looking for information after I had saw someone recently add the abbreviations to a bunch of leads. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 08:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::No problem at all! Generally, I find that professional wrestlers’ article leads are either too brief or too elaborate. Omega’s is a good length, in my opinion. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Combined reigns table == | |||
I read the PW/SG thing and no where does it say that people on the same amount of days but have more reigns are ranked higher and if you look at other articles that have combined reigns you will see that people with the same amount of days are ranked equally regardless of number of reigns. ] (]) 00:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|Browndog91}} According to WP:PW/SG it should be sorted as "If two or more wrestlers are tied in days, priority is given in this order: most reigns, most successful defenses, alphabetical." You will find more discussion on ]. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 20:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I made a new section in ] please comment. ] (]) 08:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Lio Rush == | |||
Rush was a face last night. Why would he be facing heel Oney Lorcan to face heel Gulak? Last time I checked they don’t do heel vs. heel. Rush is a face. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|Rebelrick123}} Misplaced Pages does not accept assumptions based on events. Citations to reliable sources must be provided for face/heel turns. Anyways Oney is a babyface so I don't even know what else to say. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 17:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Humberto Carillo == | |||
Regarding the Humberto Carillo edit, I apologize for not using proper citations I had simply forgotten to add them. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|KallaroKay}} No worries the message was mainly to teach you how, if you did not know how to. Also remember to sign your posts when you post on user or article talk pages. Thanks and happy editing. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 22:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== About ] undiscussed page move == | |||
Hi StatVap, and thanks for . I've asked for assistance ]. Pete "why is the part of my brain that should remember where I left my wallet and car keys yesterday instead a concise history of Western visual art from 1850 to 1950?" AU aka --] (]) 11:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks for dedicating time to this {{ping|Shirt58}}. I appreciate it. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 21:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
::No problem, always happy to help out. Pete AU aka --] (]) 13:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
== o.o == | |||
Я си еби майката ве урод! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Apology== | |||
I would like to apologize for claiming that Bryan turned face without proof backing it up. I promise not to do that again. ] (] • ]) 22:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Gable == | |||
Chad Gable is a face. He’s been a face for weeks now. Watch the show. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: {{ping|Rebelrick123}} I am aware. However, that sort of stuff is always up to opinion. So when you add face/heel turns you have to cite a source. Also ] your talk page posts. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 22:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's true, he's right, Chad Gable did recently announce he did say he wanted people to refer to him as Shorty Gable, as it was directly coming from Mr. McMahon himself when he, Mr. McMahon, said directly that he wanted Chad Gable to come up with a new ring name and actually legitimately made fun of Chad Gable over Chad Gable 's height. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== changes == | |||
Hey! Just wanted to say that you missed the second episode of Ridiculousness he was on. Season 13 Episode 11 Machine Gun Kelly II] (]) 16:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Regarding “Shorty Gable” == | |||
At the 2019 Hell in a Cell PPV, King Corbin dubbed Chad Gable as “Shorty Gable” and after Gable won he was announced as “Shorty Gable”. People have been making edits on Gable’s Misplaced Pages page adding the name, claimimg that since it was announced it is a ringname. ] (]) 13:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|KallaroKay}} Sorry I was largly gone for over a week. In case of disputes I would suggest taking discussion to the article talk page or ]. I haven't reviewed the article yet, but it appears a discussion was started in the article talk page. What a dumb name change though. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 22:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Charlotte is a heel again? == | |||
I recently edited Charlotte's article because I thought she turned heel when she elbowed Becky Lynch last night on RAW | |||
Not long after, some user deleted my edit | |||
: {{ping|HassanTheScumbob}} Do you have a source for face/heel turns? A reliable source is required. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 18:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
I found one on Smarkoutmoment's list of heel and face turns. Is it okay if I post the link ] (]) 22:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|HassanTheScumbob}} You will find a list of reliable and unreliable sources at ]. Smarkoutmoment would not qualify as a reliable source. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 22:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Unsourced content == | |||
Dear STATic Vapor, I will put references for articles relating wrestlers. Please let me know when I make a reference if ti's great. Also if its read or something you can edit it. ] (]) 02:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
From, | |||
Kingzwest | |||
: {{ping|Kingzwest}} Hey why did you add unsourced content to ], ] and ] following this message? <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 07:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Triple H == | |||
Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's not, everybody knows Triple H did wrestle in 1991 and 1994,under Terra Ryzin' he says December 11, 1998 when he asked Owen Hart a question and Owen asked why he never went back to WCW and he brought it up when he said what he said about hating someone for throwing Alex Wright under the bus about something from the night before the night before his, Triple H 's ONLY ONLY WCW match <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 06:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Dude, Much Love as a friend, It's true on Triple H ] (]) 06:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== The Rock == | |||
Dude, Hi, Much Love as a friend, On The Rock, it really is true that The Rock actually, no lie, no joke, did appear that day on The Kelly Clarkson show in August, as You see, the week before, I kid you not, and it repeats again the day before, Kevin Hart was supposed to appear on The Kelly Clarkson show and due to his, Kevin Hart 's accident, he Texted The Rock himself and The Rock actually legitimately offered to fill in for Kevin Hart and ended up appearing on The Kelly Clarkson show, Ellen DeGenres herself vouched for it the day he also appeared on her, Ellen DeGenere's show. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Matt Hardy == | |||
I don't understand why you removed it, do I need to add where the videos come from? I think I already said that they are at the end of the you don't understand videos. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== New Page Review newsletter November 2019 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. | |||
;Getting the queue to 0 | |||
There are now {{NUMBERINGROUP:patroller}} holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.<br> | |||
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If ''each'' reviewer soon does '''only 2 reviews a day''' over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by ''every'' reviewer doing '''only 1 review every 2 days''' - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.<br> | |||
Want to join? Consider adding the ].<br> | |||
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some ]. | |||
; Coordinator | |||
Admin {{U|Barkeep49}} has been officially invested as ] by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: ] will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Misplaced Pages or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See ] to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. | |||
;Tools | |||
*It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list. | |||
*It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar. | |||
;Reviewer Feedback | |||
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. ] will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional ] for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch ''November 13''. | |||
;Second set of eyes | |||
*Not only are ''New Page Reviewers'' the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the ] section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing ''good'' work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR. | |||
*Do be sure to have ] on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers. | |||
;Arbitration Committee | |||
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. | |||
;Community Wish list | |||
There is to be no ] for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. | |||
<hr> | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself ] | |||
</small> | |||
</div>] (]) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=924341675 --> | |||
== Fredericknapoleon005 == | |||
Hi STATicVapor, please look into the constant vandalism by {{ping|Fredericknapoleon005}} on ]. ] (]) 23:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=926750357 --> | |||
== Ric Flair == | |||
Hi Much Love as a friend, It's true, Ric Flair really was always called "Ramblin' " Ric Rhodes, Tully Blanchard said as did Harley Race May 10, 1984. ] (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Hi Much Love as a friend, It really is true on Ric Flair, "That 70s Guy" Mike Awesome said May 4 1991 and repeated in November 1998 on Nitro when he accidentally called Glacier by his real name before a match and brought it up when he makes a joke about The 4 Horsemen. ] (]) 03:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks! == | |||
Hello, | |||
], Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Misplaced Pages. | |||
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at ] and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in! | |||
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community. | |||
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org. | |||
Thank you! | |||
--] (]) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Martin Urbanec@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Martin_Urbanec/MassMessage/Documenters_enwiki&oldid=19583321 --> | |||
== The Rock == | |||
Dude, Much Love as a friend, Do you have an Instagram account so I can show you something on The Rock? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== A post that i made on roman reigns == | |||
I would like to know what this post or edit was for roman that i did. I can not recall anything that i posted. And because of that someone might have used my name for the post. And now i cant do anything on wiki. So please enlighten me on this edit please. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
] | |||
<!-- ] --> | |||
;Reviewer of the Year | |||
] | |||
This year's Reviewer of the Year is {{noping|Rosguill}}. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult. | |||
Special commendation again goes to {{noping|Onel5969}} who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to {{noping| Boleyn}} and {{noping|JTtheOG}} who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well. | |||
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with ] and ] (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year. | |||
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year. | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|+Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days | |||
!Rank | |||
!Username | |||
!Num reviews | |||
!Log | |||
|- | |||
|1 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Onel5969" |47,395 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|2 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Rosguill" |41,883 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|3 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="JTtheOG" |11,493 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|4 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Arthistorian1977" |5,562 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|5 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Boleyn" |4,866 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|6 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="DannyS712" |3,995 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|7 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Cwmhiraeth" |3,812 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|8 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="Ymblanter" |3,655 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|9 | |||
|] (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="CAPTAIN" |3,553 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|- | |||
|10 | |||
|] (]) | |||
|3,522 | |||
|Patrol Page Curation | |||
|} | |||
(''The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found ''']''''') | |||
;Redirect autopatrol | |||
A recent ] on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was ]. New Page Reviewers are now able to ] who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a ] whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by {{noping|DannyS712 bot III}}. | |||
;Source Guide Discussion | |||
Set to launch early in the new year is our first ] discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a ] prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the ] for more information. | |||
;This month's refresher course | |||
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on ]. Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. | |||
</div>Delivered by ] (]) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=931696676 --> | |||
== Merry Merry! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
] (]) 15:03, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
|} | |||
== Happy Holidays! == | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);<!-- | |||
-->;" class="plainlinks">]]]{{Center|]}} | |||
'''Hello STATicVapor:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand ]. Cheers, ] (]) 16:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | |||
]{{paragraph break}} | |||
</div> | |||
{{paragraph break}} | |||
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}} | |||
Hello, | |||
I re-edited the entry you noted with the credited songwriters listed here: | |||
https://open.spotify.com/track/4Tk9QvtwwOj2Ah9E8ahutZ?si=nfbqz4qaQrmSOqqKeOmUyQ | |||
Please let me know if there's anything else you need. | |||
Thanks, | |||
Steve <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
] | |||
] (]) 20:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)01/19/2020 | |||
== Kenny Omega RfC == | |||
Hey there, STATicVapor! I hope you've been well. I remember we had a discussion regarding the use of abbreviations in professional wrestling BLP lead sections, specifically over at the ] article. I'm now writing because I wanted to get your take on ]. I'm really curious about your view on the matter, so if you would like to state it to help the discussion, it would be highly appreciated. Cheers! ]<sup>]</sup> 18:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
== getting a wikipedia made == | |||
How you doing im a artist trying to get a wikapedia page made. i have several google news articles and a real fanbase. I also have a newspaper article being written by my hometown covering my story as we speak. I have over a million plays across all platforms and I have 15 thousand instagram followers and with in that 200+ are verified users.Ive worked with grammy award winning and platinum producers and have a real story even before my success in music. | |||
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNQykFakOpZVUv50Q4m3LutO8DOJVQ%3A1580922774221&source=hp&ei=lvc6Xu2TC-zr_Qaoqp-IDg&q=shay+bxxgie&oq=&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.35i362i39l10.0.0..58534...10.0..0.0.0.......0......gws-wiz.....10.ytnB_bOVJTE#kpfb-kpid=_0fc6XpH_D-qm_QbU_I7YAQ11 | |||
Above is my google search link were i have a creditable google knowledge panel and all my music. if you could give me a reply on how i can get this done id be very grateful. | |||
My artist name is "Shay Bxxgie". Website- shaybxxgie.com .Social media @shaybxxgie <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Source Guide Discussion | |||
The first ] discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success. | |||
;Redirects | |||
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the ]. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at ]. | |||
;Discussions and Resources | |||
*There is an ] around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles. | |||
*A recent discussion of whether ] restraunts are notable was ]. | |||
*A ] with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month. | |||
*A ] to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn. | |||
;Refresher | |||
] generally do not need ] type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of ] for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline. | |||
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095 | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]</small> | |||
</div>16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=940512118 --> | |||
==Looking for Some Help== | |||
Hey, StaticVapor, this one is a bit weird, but I'd like your help with something. There's a user who keeps making unhelpful alterations to the List of Impact Wrestling Personnel page, specifically attempting to remove Bhupinder Singh every 2 or 3 months with no source outside of "I haven't seen him wrestle on TV." Now, Bhupinder is still there, in training, and I'm beginning to get extremely frustrated with this user's edits. What would the best course of action be in regards to getting this ongoing issue resolved? I'm coming to you simply because I know you're an experienced user especially when it comes to professional wrestling articles, so I figured I'd ask rather than have it become uncivil and so on. ] (]) 03:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Stop sending me messages == | |||
Before sending your malicious messages, first check the edit date and then rate me "vandalism", it is not the first time that you do it without checking the MLW webpage, the MLW roster page is very very active, only in this case you can check my edition date April 3rd, and you just now April 14th waited for Salina to return to the roster to send me your message of bad coexistence on wikipedia. I never edit "unsupported" or "vandalism" as you imply without proof, look here https://web.archive.org/web/20200402001141/https://mlw.com/fighters/MLW April 2nd, where is Salina? if you didnt know MLW in some cases works by dates so before claiming, verify and do it in time that the one that is very bad position is you. | |||
]] | |||
== New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020 == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Your help can make a difference | |||
] can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ], your help could really make a difference. | |||
;Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate | |||
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages. | |||
;Discussions and Resources | |||
*A ] on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump. | |||
*Also at the Village Pump is a ] about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion. | |||
*A proposed new ] for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus. | |||
*Also ending with no change was a ] to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images. | |||
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271 | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]</small> | |||
</div>] (]) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=962960055 --> | |||
== Wednesday Night War == | |||
A bot removed the scoreboard for how many wins NXT and AEW had in the 18-49 demographic. Can you get somebody to put it back or is it too unnecessary to do so ] (]) 01:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
== A kitten for you! == | |||
] | |||
How are you mate? | |||
] (]) 13:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
: {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}} Good! Unfortunately probably will not be editing much or at all for the near future. Appreciate the thoughts though, truely hope all is well with you! <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 00:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks man. I was out for 4 months, April to August. Was unwell, then got busy. Hope everything is well with you too! - ] (]) 05:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Damian Priest == | |||
Hey ! | |||
I want to bring it to your concern that I have been editing the page "]" by updating the article and citing all the relevant sources every week. This helps in maintaining its continuity. I was doing this for around 8 months and I have welcomed all the corrections and edits. | |||
However, today out of nowhere, the user ] has removed most of the content that I have updated every week. | |||
This user has a record of removing information from other biographies as well, and inspite of the warnings, the user continues to do so, without any relevant explanation. | |||
You understand that doing this every week takes consistency and patience to jot down every detail to make pages more informative. Please check ] page's edit history.<ref>{{cite web |first1=History: Damian Priest |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Damian_Priest&action=history}}</ref> If the edit made by ] is justified (though I still am not convinced), please let me know what is wrong. I would humbly welcome constructive criticism. | |||
Thanking You. | |||
] | |||
] (]) 10:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
: Hi {{u|NautiyalSiddharth98}}, I'll take the liberty of replying in STATicVapor's stead. For a start, I'm not in favour of Etacarinaee's large removal of sourced content, so you have my support on this matter. However, I'm not fully against Etacarinaee's concerns. His/her main point, which I agree with, is that the article was overly detailed, which is generally discouraged in encyclopedias. I wouldn't remove as much content as she did though. You might find it helpful to read ]. The article has evolved quite a bit since you sent this message; did you manage to reinstate content that Etacarinaee had removed? If you need anything, feel free to contact me. <i><b>]</b></i> <sup><small>] ▾ ]</small></sup> 06:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::: {{ping|NautiyalSiddharth98}} Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help. If I choose to edit in the future, this page is in my watchlist so I will see it. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 00:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Requesting assistance == | |||
Dear STATicVapor, | |||
I'm writing to you because you have contributed to ] and ]. | |||
I'd like to ask for your help in related articles. | |||
I'm anticipating that my latest edit in ] and ] will be continuously reverted by a certain someone. | |||
If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could assess the situation and verify if their reverts are legitimate.<br/> | |||
If you think they are not, please ] revert their reverts (in ] too). | |||
Here's the whole story, if you would like: | |||
The thing is, Jammo85 states that ] was a member of the group ], and has added this information to the respective articles.<br/> | |||
However, Addicted4517 reverted their edits + , and . | |||
By the time of the AfD discussion ], I was uninvolved with these articles. But I researched the topic and concluded that Jammo's sources were sufficient, so I selectively reverted Addicted's revert of Jammo's edit ().<br/> | |||
Addicted reverted my revert . | |||
The discussion went on the AfD itself.<br/> | |||
Addicted's main complaint was the reliability of the sources.<br/> | |||
With some effort I have collected many sources, including official ones and (they are archived, so takes some time to load), that mention Hartley being part of TMDK. The full list of sources I collected will go as footnotes: <ref>{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170303035516/http://melbournecitywrestling.com.au/2016/06/18/hostile-takeover-2016/|title=Hostile Takeover 2016|date=June 18, 2016|access-date=October 6, 2020|publisher=Melbourne City Wrestling}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160502062934/https://wrestlerampage.wordpress.com/|title=Matches announced for REVOLUTION on Friday, May 6th|date=April 11, 2016|access-date=October 6, 2020|publisher=Wrestle Rampage}} See also their ad on social media .</ref><ref name='lastword-tmdk-legacy'>{{Cite web|last=Greer|first=Jamie|date=2020-05-05|title=The Mighty, Too: Shane Thorne & Brendan Vink Continue TMDK Legacy|url=https://lastwordonprowrestling.com/2020/05/05/the-mighty-too-shane-thorne-brendan-vink-continue-tmdk-legacy/|access-date=2020-09-26|website=Last Word on Pro Wrestling|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=List of TMDK Stable Matches|url=https://www.cagematch.net/?id=29&nr=1293&page=2|url-status=live|access-date=October 6, 2020|publisher=Cage Match}}</ref><ref>Other sources on this piece of information are: , which is an article from a podcast on wrestling, which mentions Hartley as being part of TMDK; and also , which are official match advertisements from Wrestling Rampage, and show Hartley in the TMDK team. All links were accessed on October 7, 2020.</ref>. | |||
Addicted was not satisfied, and reverted my edits again and . | |||
Best, <i><b>]</b></i> <sup><small>] ▾ ]</small></sup> 06:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
: {{ping|Walwal20}} Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help look in to this. If I do I will try to take time to look into the issue that is Australian wrestling articles. <u>'''] <small>]</small>'''</u> 00:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Diwali! == | |||
{| style="border: 3px solid red; background-color: #FFCC33;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.2em;" |''']!!!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid red;" | | |||
''Sky full of fireworks,''<br> | |||
''Mouth full of sweets,''<br> | |||
''Home full of lamps,''<br> | |||
''And festival full of sweet memories...''<br> | |||
'''''Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous ].'''''<br> | |||
] (]) 08:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | |||
:<small>Send Diwali wishings by adding {{tls|Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.</small> | |||
|}{{clear}} | |||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
==DYK for We Dem Boyz== | |||
{{tmbox | |||
|type = notice | |||
|image = ] | |||
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that ''''']''''' by American rapper ] was the first song to be premiered by the music identifying app ]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/We Dem Boyz|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/We Dem Boyz|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> Thanks from the Wiki and I ] (]) 00:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Rick Ross Mugshot == | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=990308269 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol December Newsletter == | |||
Hello. I went on Rick Ross' page to check out his biography and saw that a mug shot is being used for his photo. I'm sure that this wasn't intentional, but it just doesn't seem appropriate to use for an artist. I found this on Google Images; not sure if you can use it but it seems better, and more respectful. | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
http://e31gbvb944rzg5u2.zippykid.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/rick-ross-e1357661090287.jpg | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
] | |||
Thanks! | |||
;Year in review | |||
] (]) 01:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by {{noping|Rosguill}} who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to {{noping|JTtheOG}} and {{noping|Onel5969}} who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to {{noping|John B123}}, {{noping|Hughesdarren}}, and {{noping|Mccapra}} who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by {{noping|DannyS712}} which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the ]. | |||
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
{| class='wikitable sortable' | |||
! Rank | |||
! Username | |||
! Num reviews | |||
! Log | |||
|- | |||
| 1 | |||
| {{User0|DannyS712 bot III}} | |||
| data-sort-value=DannyS712 bot III | {{FORMATNUM:67552}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 2 | |||
| {{User0|Rosguill}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Rosguill | {{FORMATNUM:63821}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 3 | |||
| {{User0|John B123}} | |||
| data-sort-value=John B123 | {{FORMATNUM:21697}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 4 | |||
| {{User0|Onel5969}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Onel5969 | {{FORMATNUM:19879}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 5 | |||
| {{User0|JTtheOG}} | |||
| data-sort-value=JTtheOG | {{FORMATNUM:12901}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 6 | |||
| {{User0|Mcampany}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Mcampany | {{FORMATNUM:9103}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 7 | |||
| {{User0|DragonflySixtyseven}} | |||
| data-sort-value=DragonflySixtyseven | {{FORMATNUM:6401}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 8 | |||
| {{User0|Mccapra}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Mccapra | {{FORMATNUM:4918}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 9 | |||
| {{User0|Hughesdarren}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Hughesdarren | {{FORMATNUM:4520}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 10 | |||
| {{User0|Utopes}} | |||
| data-sort-value=Utopes | {{FORMATNUM:3958}} | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
]] | |||
: {{ping|Vigelande12}} There is a discussion on the talk page a few months ago where it was deemed okay. It is basically the only ''free'' image we have of his full face and it is not obviously a mugshot. '''] <small>]</small>''' 05:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
;Reviewer of the Year | |||
{{noping|John B123}} has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity. | |||
;NPP Technical Achievement Award | |||
== Alonzo Holt == | |||
As a special recognition and thank you {{noping|DannyS712}} has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition. | |||
Why do you keep messing with my page? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271 | |||
: Stop adding fake content, it is not your page. '''] <small>]</small>''' 05:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]</small> | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
</div> | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
|doc=yes | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=992938304 --> | |||
|User=Prism | |||
|1=t | |||
}} 15:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Kanye West studio albums GTC == | |||
== Allegations == | |||
I have given you credit on the ]; care to leave any comments? --] 08:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
You will stop with your harassment now. Enough. ] (]) 06:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Merry Christmas! == | |||
: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} Laughing out loud. Sounds like ]. I have never harassed you, sorry try again. . '''] <small>]</small>''' 07:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;" | |||
:: You brought all of that before an advisement board and they disagreed. Stop sending me baseless messages and warnings. I don't care what you think about me, but seriously grow up and leave me alone. ] (]) 07:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. <br />Happy editing,'''<br /> | |||
] (]) 07:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}'' | |||
::: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} Disagreed? ] did you see any "disagreement" at all? The administrators completely agreed with us and practically laughed off your ridiculous remarks. When you edit war, they are not baseless and if you continue with the horrid editing you will be blocked. Sorry brodie, but the only one that needs growing up is you. '''] <small>]</small>''' 07:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:::: You have a seriously warped vision of a board that ultimately decided that your claims against me were baseless and declined your request. What the hell is a brodie? Look, enough. Seriously. We're done discussing this and I'm done interacting with you unless I have no alternative. ] (]) 08:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::: I will reiterate: Do not interact with me unless it is absolutely necessary to do so as I want to avoid these kinds of disagreements in the future. You are not allowed to remove other people's messages from talk pages, but I refuse to engage in your attempts to draw me into another argument so that you can have a second attempt at banning me. Enough. Do not interact with me again. ] (]) 09:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} See ] which you continue to violate, the removal was clearly justified. '''] <small>]</small>''' 09:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::: I'm just going to point out this instance where you attempted to chastise me for doing exactly what you just did for the sole purpose of highlighting your hypocrisy before never speaking to you again: ] (]) 09:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} That comment is barley uncivil, it is not a full blown ] like every single one of your damn posts. At least that person was commenting on the content '''not the contributors'''. Please do not ever do that again. I am so sick of seeing you saying my name in every single discussion. For you to think this is appropriate: is ridiculous. '''] <small>]</small>''' 16:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::: You're choosing to interpret my actions as personal attacks. I think you've misinterpreted what I was trying to do with those messages on those user's pages. I wasn't trying to slander you at all; I was trying to combat the argument that they were going to see on those pages that you made about my alleged bias. That was it. I only mention your name when you're involved in the discussion at hand. Let me also point out that you were the one to initiate the "commenting on users instead of content" when you accused me of not having a ] for no reason at the start of the conversation over the critical consensus on the Artpop page. ] (]) 16:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} No if you read ] you would know they are. I am not misinterpreting anything, you were blatantly slandering me across multiple pages. You need to learn to '''comment on content not contributors'''. And why do you think I accused you of not having a NPOV? Because you do not and it is blatantly obvious. But do not comment here again, I am done replying to you. '''] <small>]</small>''' 17:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Reece, whether your remarks were intended as personal attacks or not, this does seem to be a case of harassment on your part, which includes repeatedly doing things towards others that they find irritating. ] (]) 19:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::: {{ping|Reece Leonard}} Reece, just STOP! No admin ever agreed with your opinion. Anyone who wants to read the entire thing can do so . That thread was simply '''automatically''' archived after 36 hours of inactivity. DO NOT USE IT AS AN EXCUSE TO ] OTHER USERS! ] (]) 01:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::: {{ping|Homeostasis07}} Yeah good thing I brought the discussion back. Glad I am not the only one seeing this blatant harassment. How much you wanna bet he will violate either the topic or interaction ban before its over? I guess we will just have to watch for sockpuppets. '''] <small>]</small>''' 01:44, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::: {{ping|User:STATicVapor}} Agreed. Whatever the outcome of that discussion will be, Artpop and several other Gaga articles will still be on my Watchlist. My Wiki Watchlist is practically my home page: so any suspicious/unusual activity will immediately be reported. ] (]) 01:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Happy New Year, STATicVapor! ==<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks"> | |||
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
]] | |||
|doc=yes | |||
{{Paragraph break}} | |||
|User=Prism | |||
{{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}} | |||
|1=t | |||
'''STATicVapor''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. | |||
}} 18:31, 5 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<br />] (]) 08:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)<br /><br /> | |||
</div> | |||
''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}'' | |||
{{clear}} | |||
== |
== ] update == | ||
Do you remember what information was newly available when you did ]? ] (]) 00:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021 == | |||
: {{ping|Josephdavinci}} Since Misplaced Pages runs on ], I would need to see ] or official posts from one of the founders Southside/Lex Lugar to support your changes. We need to be able to detonate that you are actually officially in the group and not just a fan trying to get your name there to promote yourself. '''] <small>]</small>''' 06:37, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
]] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
Please join ] - there is increase in the abuse of Misplaced Pages and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including ]. Even our review systems themselves at ] and ] have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs. | |||
Tarentino verified it actually] (]) 06:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
] are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection ]. | |||
: {{ping|Josephdavinci}} Link? '''] <small>]</small>''' 06:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages. | |||
Its in my direct messages on twitter how can I link it <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
There are currently '''706''' New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers. | |||
==Promotional single vs Official== | |||
Okay so I know you will just tell me that any single that appears on the album and is available to purchase is official BUT...Dark Horse/Walking On Air were available for purchase as a promotional singles because they were simply available to purchase off the albums preorder. Break the Bank was released this way as well/has no radio release date so that can only mean that it's technically a promtional single too, right? ] (]) 10:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software. | |||
: {{ping|BlaccCrab}} No "Break the Bank" was released for digital download as a single as seen . This is referenced on the album and song article. '''] <small>]</small>''' 20:45, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described ]. | |||
<hr> | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]</small> <small> Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1044572521 --> | |||
== November 2021 backlog drive == | |||
Walking On air has that too, it's just a link to an individual song off amazon . They were both released the same way, a song to download off of itunes pre-preorder ] (]) 20:52, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
Ok so the link you gave me is just a link to the track off the album but I found the link to the single. How does a song being released on amazon qualify it as a single? a 6 minute track that never gets sent to radio can't possibly be considered an official single ] (]) 20:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">November 2021 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* On November 1, a ] for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. | |||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. | |||
*Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. | |||
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
(] · ]) ''']''' 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
: {{ping|BlaccCrab}} Yes it was released on there February 17, 2014 in the link I gave you, prior to the album's release as a retail single in the format of ]. ]s are only song's released for free or '''only''' available with the iTunes pre-order. If they have a separate download page they are a single. As for the weird way pop articles work sometimes see ] and yes a six minute song that ''may'' be sent to radio is a single as I just explained. In no way is a radio release required to be a "official single". '''] <small>]</small>''' 21:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1051512397 --> | |||
== |
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | ||
this is a video on youtube that explains everything I've been telling you. I believe you have awful intentions to hide the truth (which is the man was born August 30, 1978), for reason im unaware; maybe because your jealous. He was one of three underage boys in 1994 to be sent to federal prison. Ten years later, when he got out, leaves him in his twenties. Ten years after that, which is current time, puts him in his thirties! im not sure of your personal reasons but please stop lying on his Misplaced Pages page it is hurtful to his fans. Don't know if this will change your opinion you seem dead set on ageing this man. But if authenticity means anything to you the honest truth will be displayed. ] (]) 17:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
: That explains nothing. In the source does he say that he was born on August 30, 1978? Then it is ]. There are two sources cited in the article that place him as older. You are coming up with these bad faith accusations and I am not trying to "age him" at all. According to the ] he was 37 in 2010 . '''] <small>]</small>''' 18:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== Sorry == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
I didn't meant to be annoying on the page 'Yours Truly' | |||
</td></tr> | |||
I just didn't know... | |||
</table> | |||
The reason I tried it a second time is that I thought there was something wrong with my internet. | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1056563273 --> | |||
Sorry | |||
] (]) 18:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Misplaced Pages page creation == | |||
: {{ping|Flumen-fulmen}} No problem at all, you are a beginner, mistakes are completely understandable. '''] <small>]</small>''' 19:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Hello, I’m curious as to if you would consider creating a Misplaced Pages page for a artist. And if so what info would you need provided, and any fees associated. ] (]) 20:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Magna Carta== | |||
Are you looking at the review comments Static? —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 16:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022 == | |||
: {{ping|IndianBio}} Sorry for lag, I shall get to them either early in the day today or tomorrow, so if you would like feel free to detail another section. '''] <small>]</small>''' 17:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
== Stop bullying me == | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
]] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue. | |||
Stop playing the enforcer and stop bullying people as a meatpuppett. ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the ], but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant. | |||
: {{ping|GabeMc}} There is no bullying going on at all, you obviously just do not understand guidelines and policies. Referring to a single revert as "bullying" is just beyond ridiculous. Please understand ] and you obviously have no idea what a ] even is... This message is just littered with inaccurate libel.'''] <small>]</small>''' 18:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
:: You reverted my at other pages where Dan pinged you; it will not be difficult to show that you meatpuppett for him at numerous pages, so stop being a bully. ] <sup>(]|])</sup> 18:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
In the last 30 days, only ] have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently ] New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All {{NUMBEROFADMINS:R}} administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP. | |||
::: {{ping|GabeMc}} Yes this is Misplaced Pages, you will be reverted quite often just as everyone is, try to get used to it. And the hilarity in that thought is becoming. It would take me more than two hands to count how many times me and Dan have reverted eachother in the four years I have been here. I only commented on that page (did not revert anything), since you obviously refused to abide by a ] on that article and as many other editors told you, you were wrong. But please I do not want you to harass me all the time like you do Dan, so in the future just abide by ] and discuss controversial changes. Most certainly do not change any guides, guidelines or policies to fit your opinion. And after you just vandalized my talk page, '''do not post on it again or I will report you to ]'''. '''] <small>]</small>''' 18:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear. | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
|doc=yes | |||
|User=Zanimum | |||
|1=t | |||
}} 21:41, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
== 2 Pac == | |||
So why do u keep changing it back to your incorrect info?????? Its about Big Dric, that's why Stretch produced it, that's why Stretch says before his verse, " I love u forever my nigga" who would think Stretch would say that about some dude he never met, from the West Coast.... the goal here is correct info, and youre posting mis-info. {{{unsigned|Chronos12713} | |||
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
: {{ping|Chronos12713}} Do you have reliable sources? '''] <small>]</small>''' 02:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]<br>Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
::1st I don't see any references or sources on your claim, 2nd in a Live Squad YouTube video a Live Squad member speaks on it 3rd it just makes more sense, cuz why would Stretch say I love u, etc and if it was a tribute to Johnny Is dude, wouldn't Johnny J have been the producer? | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB. Copyedited by User:Kudpung. Proofread by user: DanCherek--> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1089313003 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022 == | |||
::: {{ping|Chronos12713}} First sign all your posts on talk pages with four "~" markings as in: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Second, it is not "my claim" I barley started watch listing the page last week, even though I have had the CD for years. I also do not see any producer credit in the article for Stretch. '''] <small>]</small>''' 03:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)] (]) 05:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)ok sorry about the sign in thing I'm not very tech-savy... to follow up, on Stretch's wikipedia page it lists him as producer of the song... and I don't know how helpful the YouTube video would be but its called "Remembering Tupac stories from the Live Squad DVD, most of the vid is Stretch's brother Majesty, but within the first minute or two another member speaks on Big Dric, he gives an account of Pac's interaction with him and it even has some video footage of him | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
== Akon == | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
]] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Backlog status | |||
It's a bit of fun, you make it out like I've committed one of the most heinous acts a human can do, calm down. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new ] on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000{{efn|not including another ~6,000 redirects}} at the end of May. | |||
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.{{efn|The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.}} | |||
: {{ping|BrettRickles}} The message is templated. If you plan to vandalize ] in serious ways such as changing vital information such as their name or birthday without sources, you would quickly be blocked if you continued. '''] <small>]</small>''' 03:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
In the last 30 days, ] have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month). | |||
== FOX Animated Universe == | |||
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month). | |||
I have started a discussion on the talk page for the FOX Animated Universe to keep it. You can find the discussion right ]. Thanks and have a good day. - ] (]) 09 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
;Backlog drive | |||
== why you warning me == | |||
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by ] and ], will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up ]. ] Barnstars will be awarded. | |||
;TIP – New school articles | |||
hey why are you wrning me?? | |||
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Misplaced Pages's projects and policy pages. ] has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable. | |||
there arealot of reference links in wikipedia then why areyou deleting my links?/ <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
;Misc | |||
: {{ping|Awais66}} Because you are ] many articles with links to this random website, that is why. '''] <small>]</small>''' 20:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
There is a new template available, {{txl|NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder: | |||
:{{NPP backlog}} | |||
There has been significant discussion at ] recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues. | |||
== Escape the Fate music genre edits == | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
Hello, this is me, firehawksal19. I will try to comprehensive and open minded as I can. The reason why I changed the music genres in Escape the Fate's Misplaced Pages article is because their music sounds more than what the article described it as before I edited the page. Back then, before I had a Misplaced Pages account, I went on their page and not only were they listed as "Post-hardcore", "hard rock" and "emo", they were also listed as "Alternative metal" and "metalcore". I've listened to their music, and not only do I consider their music as post-hardcore, I also believe they are a heavy metal/alternative metal/metalcore band as well. I know it seems stupid, but that why I edited the page. Feel free to reply back to me if you need to. | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Consider staying informed on project issues by putting ] on your watchlist. | |||
*If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
*To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
;Notes | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB. Copyedited by User:Kudpung. Proofread by user: DanCherek--> </div> | |||
] (]) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Nnadigoodluck@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1094756077 --> | |||
== NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on! == | |||
-firehawksal19. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
: {{ping|Firehawksal19}} That is what we call ], what is listed in the infobox now is what is sourced to be their genres in the article body. '''] <small>]</small>''' 21:22, 9 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">July 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. | |||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. | |||
*Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. | |||
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
|} | |||
(] · ]) ''']''' 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1096016086 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022 == | |||
==Hey budds== | |||
Static are you online? Need to ask a favor. —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 14:27, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
: {{ping|IndianBio}} I am now, do you still need something? '''] <small>]</small>''' 19:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Backlog status | |||
::{{ping|STATicVapor}}, the issue with Reece must be fresh in your memory, was just gonna ask you that in the Indian film articles we have an exact same user refusing to come to terms with consensus when the whole 99.99% of the community is against him/her. The user is blatantly disrupting articles and removing sourced content. May I tempt you a penny for your thoughts? —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 06:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators {{u|Buidhe}} and {{u|Zippybonzo}}, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to {{u|Dr vulpes}} who led with 880 points. See ] for further details. | |||
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the '''other 600 reviewers''' to do more! Please try to do at least '''one a day'''. | |||
::: {{ping|IndianBio}} I noticed that discussion at the WikiProject. I have had a disputes with the user in question and completely agree with your opinion on him/her. They are blatantly disruptive and uncivil, and does not have a strong grasp of ]. If you or someone else decides to start a ] discussion that shows promise, then I would happily comment on it. '''] <small>]</small>''' 06:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
;Coordination: {{u|MB}} and {{u|Novem Linguae}} have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. {{u|MPGuy2824}} will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years. | |||
::::Thanks, this is really going in a nasty direction and it seems the user is enjoying it. I really do not want this to blow up like the issue with Reece. :( —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 06:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
;Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at ]). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it ]. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive. | |||
::::: Yeah I can understand that. However, now that , I will be happy to no longer have to worry or comment on that user again. As I know you watch and edit Lady Gaga pages exponentially more than I do, if you see Reece editing any of them or any suspicious new accounts or IPs, let me know of them so I may report them to an administrator. Outside of any possible violations of their topic ban, I would prefer not discussing that user to avoid any scrutiny due to the interaction ban (yay no more harassment), which includes discussing the user. '''] <small>]</small>''' 06:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
;TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated ]. | |||
::::::Yeah forget about that, come to the ''Magna Carta'' page. :) —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 06:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
== Question == | |||
;New reviewers: The ] is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read ] exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page ]. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
How do you cite a source when you edit a page? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Consider staying informed on project issues by putting ] on your watchlist. | |||
*If you have noticed a user with a ''good'' understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{tq|<nowiki>{{subst:NPR invite}}</nowiki>}} on their talk page. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software. | |||
*To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB and User:Kudpung. Proofread by User:DanCherek --> </div> | |||
Delivered by: ] (]) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1102314130 --> | |||
== NPP message == | |||
: {{ping|Jacob Sudduth}} See ], it should fully explain it to you. '''] <small>]</small>''' 23:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
== PWinsider.com are "unreliable sources"? == | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
;Invitation | |||
Considering that the site has been in operation for over a decade, evolved from the original 1wrestling.com, and are staffed with guys whom once were employed in ECW, and have many sources within WWE, TNA, ROH, and across the indy lanscape, I would like to know how they are considered "unreliable"? They've even had Tod Gordon, Bruno Sammartino, Jim Cornette, and even Triple H on the site. And currently they have Mike "Nova/Simon Dean" Bucci and Paul London as occasional contributors. They are not tabloid writers, but reputable journalist with actual resumes in pro wrestling, and current contacts that include active performers and employees in the companies they report. | |||
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see ], and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated. | |||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]</small> | |||
So, can you explain to me how they are unreliable when just about every story they break or report are 100% true? And in the even that they post erroneous information, they have the class to publicly apologize for it. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:Kudpung & User:MB--> </div> | |||
] (]) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1105345534 --> | |||
==NPP Award for 2019== | |||
: {{ping|Risephoenixrise}} I never once said in that discussion that they were unreliable, I believe you messaged the wrong person. '''] <small>]</small>''' 23:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | | |||
'''The New Page Patroller's Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; width:100%;" | For over '''100''' article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -] (]) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -] (]) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
I posted updates on the CM Punk entry, which were reverted with this reference: | |||
== October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive == | |||
(-1,275) . . (Reverted 3 edits by Risephoenixrise (talk): Unreliable sources. (TW)) (undo | thank) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
: {{ping|Risephoenixrise}} I was referring to Wrestlezone and that PWinsider is only allowed to be used for noncontroversial things such as match results, not rumors or speculation. '''] <small>]</small>''' 03:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">]</span> | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* On 1 October, a ] for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. | |||
* Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. | |||
*Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. | |||
* ''']'''! | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
|} | |||
(] · ]) ''']''' 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1110106306 --> | |||
== New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022 == | |||
Again, your perception of that site are not reality. They are not in the business of rumors or speculation, they have posted legitimate news for over a decade--and even longer when they were staffed under Bob Ryder and Joey Styles's 1wrestling.com. They are a reliable source. If they weren't a reliable source, then why does Mike Bucci and Paul London contribute to their site? If they weren't a reliable source then why did Jim Cornette, Bruno Sammartino, and Triple H (yes, THAT Triple H) agree to do audio shoot interviews with the site? They have sources that they double and triple-check that are employed within WWE and TNA, and every organization they write a story on. The story that I posted of Punk's walkout was not a rumor whatsoever, as been proven in the weeks that preceeded it. The story actually happened, and the source was indeed a credible one because the events I described were 100% true. There was no rumor involved. | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
The only speculation that exists, with all due respect, is your speculation that their work is not legitimate news. They have resumes in the business and report NOTHING unless they have a story that can be double-sourced and has legs. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
] | |||
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The ] finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the ]. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section. | |||
'''Awards''': Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to {{Noping|MPGuy2824}}), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to {{no ping|John B123}} for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the ]. Check out the new ] also. | |||
== Unreliable == | |||
'''Software news''': {{Noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{Noping|MPGuy2824}} have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently ]. The ] has also been improved. | |||
] | |||
'''Suggestions''': | |||
*There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed". | |||
*Reminder: ''an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more.'' (from the ]) | |||
*Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue. | |||
*This ] puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar. | |||
'''Backlog''':] Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the ] to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate! | |||
just click on the song title, have you seen it ] (]) | |||
{{-}} | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
;Reminders | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
*If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the , where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers. | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at ]. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1114894896 --> | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 22:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
== RVD's time off == | |||
== ] == | |||
Dear STATic VaPor, | |||
Hi there. I know this was a really long time ago, but you started ]. Then there was a second one, ]. The article has been created again. I'm not sure how much new material can be added about a teenager who died several years ago. I'm wondering if the article has been improved to the point of notability. Thanks. ] (]) 16:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
I would like to inform you of the Professional Wrestler Rob Van Dam and why he has taken 'time off' from World Wrestling Entertainment since 7th October 2013. Many superstars which perform in Professional Wrestling tend to take 'time off' every once in a while however their contracts are not terminated. Stipulations in their contracts provide them with limited amount of appearances over a certain time period, may it be over a month or a year. When companies like the WWE announce their superstars are taking 'time off' it usually means they are going to have vacation time or rehabilitate from an injury however the company informs the public of this through their official website and social media. After RVD lost to Alberto Del Rio at Battleground he had to take 'time off' due to his written contract he signed with the company. These stipulations have always been present in not only WWE but many other Professional Wrestling companies. For example, WWE Wrestler CM Punk has taken 'time off' although he still has a legal contract to the company. His still remains a WWE employee however he has taken upon himself to have his vacation now although it is very troublesome for the company with Wrestlemania 30, the biggest wrestling showcase on the planet set to take place a month from now. | |||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023 == | |||
It pains me to say this but the only link I could find which supported my information on RVD's 'time off' has come from Bleachrreport. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1806696-rob-van-dam-disputes-online-reports-claims-hell-be-back-in-wwe | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
The article itself details of RVD apparently having a dispute with the booking team and how he has been handled since returning to the company. However this is not the case and he confirms these reports of mistreatment are nonsense, which everyone believes they are. Referencing RVD's absence with WWE.com is not enough in depth news on his hiatus from the company for over 3 months. I have worked with a number of Professional Wrestling promotions such as SMASH, Chikara and Dragon Gate USA. Reviewing contracts of such popular talents as Yoshihiro Tajiri, Dave Finlay, Yoshihiro Asai and Masanori Murakawa. My knowledge of the Professional Wrestling business and how it works are of a very high standard and has been for many years. | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
;Backlog | |||
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to {{noping|WaddlesJP13}} who led with 2084 points. See ] for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. | |||
;2022 Awards | |||
] | |||
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Rosguill}} led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the ] and the ]. Congratulations everyone! | |||
'''Minimum deletion time''': The previous ] guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and ]). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the ] are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.) | |||
Thank you for taking your time to read this. | |||
'''New draftify script''': In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly ]. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your ] or vector.js file from <code>User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js</code> to <code>User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js</code>''' | |||
Deluxe Editor. | |||
'''Redirects''': Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see ], ], and spend some time at ]. | |||
] (]) 00:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)11/03/14 | |||
'''Discussions with the WMF''' The ] signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted ] in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as {{noping|Novem Linguae}} and {{noping|MPGuy2824}} have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also ] with the NPP coordinators to discuss ] that new users see. | |||
: {{ping|Deluxe Editor}} Yes I realize that, but ] must be ] for content additions and according to ], BleacherReport is considered unreliable. '''] <small>]</small>''' 01:28, 11 March 2014 (UTC)| | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
;Reminders | |||
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
|doc=yes | |||
*There is live chat with patrollers on the . | |||
|User=XXSNUGGUMSXX | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
|1=t | |||
*If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at ]. | |||
}} 05:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Drafted by User:MB, Reviewed by Novem Linguae, Kudpung --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MB@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1130464022 --> | |||
== Re: ] == | |||
==What's your problem?== | |||
He finished his edit 3 minutes before me and all he did was write background info. I had the infobox, album artwork, and tracklist all he did was jot down some information he got off a fan website after I had already previewed the page so there was an edit conflict from 3 little paragraphs he wrote. I'm tired of you undoing everything I do ] (]) 16:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)]) 16:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
I’ve edited this disambiguation page to remove any reference to Ruth Etting. I’ve found no reference in any google search to associate her with the popular 1931 song. The song’s Misplaced Pages article doesn’t mention her, and her own Misplaced Pages article doesn’t mention the song. If you can provide a reliable reference to revert my edit, please do. If not, I regret that Misplaced Pages’s rules of civility prevent me from finishing this communique properly. ] (]) 08:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Oh yeah, not to metion NONE of his work that he scibbled down in 5 minutes is still left on the page after more editors came in to improve the article while my tracklist/genres/introduction is still there. ] (]) 16:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive == | |||
: {{ping|BlaccCrab}} Sorry for the misunderstanding, I was just about to message you and restore it. I was busy this morning and I did not look that into it. After my edit that other user came in and cleaned it up. I believe you do deserve credit for "creating the page". '''] <small>]</small>''' 16:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
Thank you, and my apologies if I snapped a little. It's just I worked on making that for like an hour last night and it was my first album page lol ] (]) 17:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2023 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* On 1 May, a ] for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. | |||
* Article patrolling is not part of the drive. | |||
* ''']'''! | |||
* There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
|} | |||
] (]) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Jonesey95@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1150755897 --> | |||
== New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023 == | |||
: {{ping|BlaccCrab}} That's good, you should take around an hour or so to create pages, then you come out with a good sized and informative article (]). Album pages do take longer to create then song pages though, and ] take even longer. But longer you edit here you will get even better and faster at creating them. '''] <small>]</small>''' 17:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
== Is it Possible To Ask For Help == | |||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers --> | |||
I found this article on a record producer that was marked for deletion. It said if I was going to work on it then I could. So I am working on it but you marked it for deletion again. Is it possible that we could work on it together. I found some things on this guy and he is really good. I mean from what I see he has done tons of work From the US to the UK and more. Just wondering if you could sort of help me out. I would love to have this article under my belt. I made a few small edits here and there but this one I spent time on. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
'''Backlog''' | |||
'''Redirect drive''': In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with '''23851''' reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to '''0''' (momentarily). Congratulations to {{Noping|Hey man im josh}} who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by {{noping|Meena}} and {{noping|Greyzxq}} with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See ] for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day. | |||
: {{ping|LennyPerez44}} I believe you should create the article at ] to avoid it being deleted an additional time. From a google search I could not find enough coverage in ] like ''XXL'', MTV, ''The Source'', BET, etc that would merit an article per the notability guideline at ]. However, feel free to work on it at ] until he meets ] and/or ]. '''] <small>]</small>''' 18:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
'''Redirect autopatrol''': All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them ]. | |||
: {{ping|STATicVapor}} Thanks... that is a great explanation of what I need to find in order to complete an article on a record producer. I really appreciate that information. | |||
'''WMF work on PageTriage''': The ], consisting of {{noping|Samwalton9 (WMF)|label1=Sam|JSherman (WMF)|label2=Jason|SCardenas (WMF)|label3=Susana}}, and also some patches from {{noping|Jon (WMF)|label1=Jon}}, has been hard at work ]. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in ] where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of ], to help find bugs. We will post more details at ] when we are ready for beta testers. | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
|doc=yes | |||
|User=XXSNUGGUMSXX | |||
|1=t | |||
}} 23:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Possible Monterrosa == | |||
'''Articles for Creation (AFC)''': All new page reviewers are now '''automatically approved''' for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at ] like was required previously). To install the ], visit ], visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit ], and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script. | |||
Do you and {{ping|Winkelvi}} sense a quack with IP 2605:e000:96c0:af00:dc19:c1f:cb9b:d9 on ] or am I making to early of a call? Winkelvi has an SPI and I'm tempted to add it but am not sure. ] (]) 03:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
You can review the AFC workflow at ]. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that ], so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest. | |||
: {{ping|XXSNUGGUMSXX}} I actually thought the same thing, but I think it might be a bit too soon to say. If they continue editing articles such as Seth's, ], ], ] etc, then I would say definitely report them. On another note, thanks a lot for the Good Article review, I have been waiting on that one for a while. I really appreciate you taking the time to review it. '''] <small>]</small>''' 03:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::My pleasure. Let's wait for what else that IP does. What makes me really suspicious is the "2605" range that was previously proven to be Monterrosa sock IP. ] (]) 03:50, March 12, 2014 (UTC) | |||
'''Pro tip''': Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own ]? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is ] 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums). | |||
:::Exactly what I thought, but agree it's too early to say. He's getting a little more sly in how he edits as a sock. Looks like he now will test for a few days with IP edits and account edits to see if anyone's on to him. Then the edits occur more frequently if he thinks he's in the clear. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 03:54, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
:::: {{ping|XXSNUGGUMSXX}} {{ping|Winkelvi}} Definitely has been attempting to be more slick with it. Yeah and once he edits more, then they get blocked. I do not know what sockmasters get out of wasting their time with stuff like this, it gets quite annoying after they do this for months on end.. '''] <small>]</small>''' 03:58, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
'''Reminders''' | |||
*Newsletter feedback - please take this ] about the newsletter. | |||
*There is live chat with patrollers on the and {{IRC|wikimedia-npp}} on IRC. | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Drafted by Novem Linguae, MPGuy2824 and Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1160196052 --> | |||
== New pages patrol needs your help! == | |||
:::::To think that only two months ago Monterrosa had a chance to edit freely after a week without wiki activity and completely wasted that chance by attempting to evade the one-week block, which grew into a three-week for one attempt of evasion and then indefinite for another. Not sure how much longer this will go on for if it hasn't already stopped. Winkelvi has been quite diligent in seeking out the numerous socks made since..... ] (]) 04:05, March 12, 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::::: I know, evading that block was a huge mistake for them and yeah got to give credit to ] for weeding out all the socks this guy has made. '''] <small>]</small>''' 04:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
{{od}}Reading his article talk page comment, it's definitely him. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 05:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers --> | |||
] | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
The ] team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting ]. Thank you very much for your help. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
== Interaction ban == | |||
'''Reminders''': | |||
*There is live chat with patrollers on the . | |||
*Please add ] to your watchlist. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}}{{Clear}} | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Drafted by Illusion Flame. Reviewed by Zippybonzo. Sent by Zippybonzo. --> | |||
Sent by {{noping|Zippybonzo}} using {{noping|MediaWiki message delivery}} at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
Per the result of you are now subject to a mutual ] with ]. This restriction has been logged at ], and violations will be subject to escalating ]. This restriction can be appealed on ]/] no sooner than 6 months after its implementation, i.e. September 12, 2014. — ''''']''''' <sup>]</sup> 06:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1162688084 --> | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (] | ]) 23:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
== New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive == | |||
== Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
|doc=yes | |||
|User=IndianBio | |||
|1=t | |||
}} 06:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
==Freaky Fortune== | |||
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">October 2023 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
I have contested both your speedy deletion requests for Freaky Fortune and the other singer as representing a country at the worlds biggest music competition like Eurovision is instant notability. Regards,--] (]) 00:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
|rowspan=3|] | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
* On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. | |||
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. | |||
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. | |||
* Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. | |||
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] | |||
|} | |||
] (]) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
==MC Guimê== | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Zippybonzo@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1174536672 --> | |||
relevant musician in Brazil.] (]) 02:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== New pages patrol newsletter == | |||
== Disruptive editing? == | |||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> | |||
OK, I'm not being disruptive by editing ] articles. Some of the stuff I can't find sources for. It's not like I'm trolling or anything, I'm actually adding useful information. So please quit spamming up my talk page. Thanks! ] (]) 15:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers --> | |||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; | |||
|} | |||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, | |||
{| style="float: right; | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
|} | |||
] | |||
'''Backlog update:''' | |||
: {{ping|Jgera5}} For about the fifth time, understand that adding ] or unsourced content is not okay and will get you blocked just as easy as trolling. Adding ] is disruptive, if you cannot find a ''reliable'' source for what you are adding, do not add it. Simple as that. I am not spamming anything, you are actually lucky I did not give you a final warning like you deserved. '''] <small>]</small>''' 15:22, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
At the time of this message, there are ''11,300'' articles and ''15,600'' redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews! | |||
'''October backlog elimination drive''': | |||
==Rick Ross discography== | |||
A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can ]. | |||
'''PageTriage code upgrades''': | |||
You need to provide sources directly next to your peaks as the sources provided do not support your peaks. You should never tell editors go here or there for your inserted peaks. You should learn to follow wikipedia's policies once and for all. Your edit, by the way, removes my sources that I provided for the peaks in the table of ''Other Charted Songs''.--] (]) 17:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Upgrades to the ] code, initiated by the ] in 2022 and actioned by the ] in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found ]. As part of this work, the ] now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed - it will replace the current version soon. | |||
'''Notability tip''': | |||
: {{ping|Harout72}} No I have not, read the edit for once. I cited the source and you are not reading the damn citation that is there. I did not remove a single citation that you added. Use CTRL-F if you must, but the peaks are all there. '''] <small>]</small>''' 17:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Professors can meet ] #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their ] or ] profile and take a look at their ] and number of citations. As a ''very rough'' rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of ], a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD. | |||
'''Reviewing tip''': | |||
::It doesn't bring up any result when you type in Rick Ross and also the name of the songs, "In Vein", or "Nobody". It does, however, when only Rick Ross is typed in. I wish you could start pointing these details out properly, before , that editors provide carefully. If the peaks you add are in the sources other the main sources already provided on the discography pages, then you need to provide those additional sources. Do not expect anyone to go fetch them for you. This is simple ].--] (]) 17:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge. | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
'''Reminders:''' | |||
*You can access live chat with patrollers on the . | |||
*Consider adding ] to your watchlist. | |||
*To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]. | |||
{{refend}} | |||
::: {{ping|Harout72}}Yes the database messes up like that, when you search for some artists it turns up no results, yet we have verification of multiple chartings. Same thing when you try to search both artist and song. was not a blind revert like your edits were, the positions for Devil Is A Lie were on Billboard, which I thought was being used a citation, but I forgot you decided to mess up the whole article because Billboard was adjusting their website. The ] proof was provided in the diff you just provided, but how surprising you refuse to ] and remain ] like usual and you just blindly revert more times when content was clearly cited , yet you reverted again. '''] <small>]</small>''' 20:35, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Sent by Illusion Flame on behalf of the New Page Patrol team. --> | |||
] (]) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Lel Brothas == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1176571921 --> | |||
== November Articles for creation backlog drive == | |||
Why were they deleted? They are a legitamate band. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
<div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#98FB98; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%"> | |||
: {{ping|209.215.171.5}} See ], legitimacy is not the problem, it is ]. '''] <small>]</small>''' 01:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Hello STATicVapor: | |||
''']''' is holding a '''month long ]!'''<br /> | |||
== Step Brothers == | |||
The goal of this drive is to '''reduce''' the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023. | |||
Hi, I apologise. This is a school IP address, so occasionally things like this will happen. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
You may find ] or ] helpful. | |||
== Juelz Santana == | |||
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.<br /> | |||
What source do you have that states that Juelz Santana was born in 1982? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
There is a backlog of over {{Rounddown|{{formatnum:{{PAGESINCATEGORY:Pending AfC submissions}}|R}}|-2}} pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! ] (]) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/November_2023_Backlog_Drive/Invite_list&oldid=1182798216 --> | |||
== आपके लेख भारत आदिवासी पार्टी में == | |||
: {{ping|Dodge1991}} It is only already cited in the article. '''] <small>]</small>''' 02:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
आपके लेख भारत आदिवासी पार्टी में अध्यक्ष, महासचिव, कोषाध्यक्ष का लेख add करे ] (]) 08:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
== WrestleMania theme == | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Keep-on-Ridin.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
In regards to , I think instead of reverting immediately when you see something added by a usually reliable editor, you need to see if it checks out. Just my two cents. <b style="font-family:sans-serif;text-shadow:2px 2px 2px #9eceee;color:#fd0;">]] | <sup>]</sup></b> 04:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
: {{ping|CRRaysHead90}} Do you know how many fake themes have been added over the last few months? Per our policy ], all content must be backed by a reliable source when added the first time. I was offline for a few hours and there were almost 50 new edits on the page, including some by multiple editors that frequently add false or unsourced content (no need to list them), so I had no idea who had added it. I just noticed that new addition. Sorry for the confusion. '''] <small>]</small>''' 05:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== LEAVE ME ALONE! == | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Doe B at the 2013 BET Hip Hop Awards.jpg== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:24, 1 November 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. STATicVapor has not edited Misplaced Pages since 26 September 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Please leave a new message. |
In order to keep a conversation together, rather than spread over multiple talk pages, if you leave me a message here, I will respond here. I will also always ping you along with my responses. |
Archives |
is it possible to contact you to create a wiki page for me
WWE: Uncaged VIII
WWE: Uncaged VIII ARTICLE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DELETED ITS A GOOD READ.?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmm134 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
100,000th edit!
100,000th edit award | |
Let me be the first to congratulate you on your 100,000th edit! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your bling page! or you could choose to display the {{User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thanks for all your work at the 'pedia! Cheers, — MarnetteD|Talk 04:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
|
- @MarnetteD: Well thanks for the kind message, I didn't think anyone would notice lol. StaticVapor message me! 05:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Congrats! I will see you in that club in 3000 edits :-). - Galatz גאליץ 13:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Galatz: You got this Galatz, you're almost there lol. StaticVapor message me! 18:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- haha thanks...10 years in the making - Galatz גאליץ 19:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Galatz: You got this Galatz, you're almost there lol. StaticVapor message me! 18:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- You are most welcome S. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 16:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Belated congrats. Nice to see that star I designed going to a nice home. Vjmlhds (talk) 00:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Congrats! I will see you in that club in 3000 edits :-). - Galatz גאליץ 13:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
soulja boy article citations
sorry about the earlier edit, added in a more comprehensive version with proper citations. CashLizard (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Cashlizard
- @CashLizard: Thank you for doing that :) StaticVapor message me! 21:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Your comment to me
Relax lol. It was a good edition I just didn’t have time to source at that precise moment... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoglundan (talk • contribs) 21:35, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Hoglundan: I am very relaxed tbh. Refer to WP:BURDEN, WP:BLP and WP:V. StaticVapor message me! 21:54, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
r
Why did you revert me edit to Bill Goldberg? Jimmyy68 (talk) 12:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Jimmyy68: When you add or change content on Misplaced Pages you need to cite a reliable source for you change. Please click all the blue links in the message I sent you. Outside of that I feel no reason to say the exact match time, it is trivial. StaticVapor message me! 18:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Drake Maverick
You know, in your haste to put Maverick back as "other personnel", you put Elias back as 24/7 Champion - yet you said I put in incorrect information.
Gotta watch before you leap, sir.
Vjmlhds (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Vjmlhds: This moving of Maverick was directly against consensus from the article talk page. You already got a final warning since you returned, if I wanted ANI is that way, but I am just not active enough rn to bother. There was consensus. I don't know how winning the joke 24/7HardcoreIronmanHeavyweight championship a few more times means anything. You labeled Maverick as a 205 wrestler and that is not correct. Sorry about my mistake with Elias, did not see that until now. StaticVapor message me! 08:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Andrewboricua787407 (talk) 02:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello what is a redlik that you mention in my talk page
- @Andrewboricua787407: See WP:REDLINK There are blue links and red links. You should not remove red links unless you know that, that person or thing is not and will not ever be notable. Also you only need to sign your posts at the end of your posts on WP:TALK pages. StaticVapor message me! 08:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Pat buck info
https://www.mandatory.com/wrestlezone/news/1117371-get-to-know-guest-wwe-pc-coach-pat-buck
https://rajah.com/node/notes-impacts-code-red-event-two-new-producers-former-nxt-star-spotted
I would of quoted all of this but don’t know how, if you can help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChipDouglas820 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- @ChipDouglas820: Thanks for the effort I do appreciate it! A few things to link you to. First would be WP: Referencing for beginners and WP:CITE. Also of note, Mandatory and Rajah are known as unreliable sources, please only use reliable sources like the ones found at WP:PW/RS. All content needs to have a citation, the part I was more concerned about was the claim that he produced the match, is their a reliable source that you can find that information on? StaticVapor message me! 08:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Could you help me update my page? I can pay for it. ChipDouglas820 (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Sabu and Reno Scum
Hey, Static. I notice that on Sabu's page, you've given him the sub-heading "Second return to Impact, 2019-present" or words to that effect with a source indicating Impact are still going to use Sabu in future. Would you suggest that means Sabu should be added back to Impact's roster, or would you advise against it?
SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
- @SkylerLovefist: I was iffy on it, only because "plans can change". Maybe wait till he returns, but I wouldn't revert it if you wanted to add him back. StaticVapor message me! 03:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Since he's returned at today's taping, I'll add him back, I'll use both sources. Thanks.
While I'm at it, reports coming out from the tapings indicate Reno Scum have formalised their alliance with Ace Austin, whom they've been involved in an ongoing storyline with, along with Eddie Edwards. While no formal news of a contract has broken, they've been used a lot since Cali Combat and appear to being used going forward. Too Synth at this stage, or are they fair to be added too? SkylerLovefist (talk) 03:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- @SkylerLovefist: Oh cool that's awesome to hear, saves us the headache worrying about that. As for Reno I would wait for 1) roster profile 2) source confirming signing or 3) them being used at tapings outside of California/Nevada. They seem to only use them when it's convenient when they're touring in the area. StaticVapor message me! 07:43, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Fair call. Perhaps if they appear at the next tapings, still allied with Ace?SkylerLovefist (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- @SkylerLovefist: Yeah that would seem okay, as long as the taping isn't in Nevada/California, where Reno Scum is from lol. Also I just saw this. You could add Paul London and Chris Sabin to the backstage section as producers based off this since they have worked previous tapings as producers as well. StaticVapor message me! 23:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, the next tapings are in Canada, so pretty far from that area. Lol. I'll chuck Paul and Chris in when I have the chance. SkylerLovefist (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, editing tables at all is a nightmare on my browser. I just wish Impact frequently updated their roster page so everyone didn't have to always play the wait/guess game. StaticVapor message me! 03:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Nikki cross
Nikki cross does Indeed perform under the smack down brand as she is currently smackdown tag champ with alexa bliss you should watch it and then you'll see Kintobor86 (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Kintobor86: You must be misunderstanding something. They are not the SmackDown Tag Team Champions. That title is held by The New Day. StaticVapor message me! 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
if you check the women's division also have tag champs alexa bliss and nikki cross are champs in their first reign — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kintobor86 (talk • contribs)
- @Kintobor86: The women's tag team championships are dual brand championships. The champions can appear on both brands. Bliss and Cross are still Raw superstars though. StaticVapor message me! 22:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello STATicVapor,
- Backlog
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
- Coordinator
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
- This month's refresher course
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
- Deletion tags
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
- Paid editing
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
- Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
- Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
- Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
- Tools
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Braun Strowman
When I edited the weight of #REDIRECT Braun Strowman I did cite a reliable source, a recent interview in which Adam Scherr (Braun Strowman) said that his weight was 345-350 lbs, all you had to do was go to that video at the point of the video which I specified and hear it. So you're wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
But since you want a 'billed' weight, I added the correct billed weight for Braun Strowman. 385lbs, not 340lbs. I also provided a reliable source for it. So don't send me another message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Vannyvis55: I am clearly not "wrong", the section of the infobox does say billed weight. I saw someone else reverted it. Weird that they announced him at 385 when they said he was 340 in June. I have my doubts that his weight fluctuates that much. StaticVapor message me! 12:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Strowman's billed weight has always been 385lbs. Look at wwe.com, watch RAW every Monday night, they say 385lbs. And yes his weight does flucuate, Strowman has comfirmed that his own weight fluctuates 10-15bs per DAY (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LISn6eOwlIw) (Point 4:25). Super ShowDown was in June, three months ago, and the only show in which they said he was 340. Even if his weight was 340lbs then, it is possible for him to gain 45 lbs during that time period of three months. It doesn't matter if you 'have doubts'. It's a fact. With that being said, I have edited the page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vannyvis55 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Vannyvis55: A few comments on your editing. 1) I sent you a message to teach you how to sign your posts on talk pages, please do that. 2) Even if you think you are right, do not ever edit war, it is the quickest way to a block. As for this dispute, I saw the video and they clearly do announce him as 385 still so I will leave it alone. In the future, if someone reverts you, (especially if two people do!) discuss on the article talk page and reach consensus before restoring your preferred version. Even if you are "right" it is still edit warring.StaticVapor message me! 14:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I initially reverted Vannyvis55's edit since the channel is not verified. However I've restored it to their version, for now. Someone need to update it with a video from a verified source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: We might as well use the wwe.com profile as the source since it says the same thing as the YouTube video. I was the one who originally changed it to 340 due to the Super ShowDown video, but it appears they reverted back to the heavier weight. StaticVapor message me! 15:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem. If I remember correctly, you and someone else agreed upon that recent sources are better. Since I kinda agreed to it, I was enforcing this. We can always change it back to WWE.com official profile since Brawn is still associated with the company and his profile is likely up-to-date. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: What's sad is that don't really update their website listings. That is the only reason I jumped to make the 340 change when I saw it updated somewhere else. For example, Gulak has apparently been billed at 203 and I just watched a clip from Extreme Rules (he is billed at 202), but he is still 193 on wwe.com and on our article for him. StaticVapor message me! 17:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's kinda problematic. Do you want me to re add the YT video, since it is from August 26? I mean both the WWE source and the YT video. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I feel like leaving the YouTube ref out is best since it is a copy vio of WWE television. It was good as proof, but we now know that the .com is accurate to what they say on their show. StaticVapor message me! 19:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- I feel like leaving the YouTube ref out is best since it is a copy vio of WWE television. It was good as proof, but we now know that the .com is accurate to what they say on their show. StaticVapor message me! 19:07, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's kinda problematic. Do you want me to re add the YT video, since it is from August 26? I mean both the WWE source and the YT video. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: What's sad is that don't really update their website listings. That is the only reason I jumped to make the 340 change when I saw it updated somewhere else. For example, Gulak has apparently been billed at 203 and I just watched a clip from Extreme Rules (he is billed at 202), but he is still 193 on wwe.com and on our article for him. StaticVapor message me! 17:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I don't have a problem. If I remember correctly, you and someone else agreed upon that recent sources are better. Since I kinda agreed to it, I was enforcing this. We can always change it back to WWE.com official profile since Brawn is still associated with the company and his profile is likely up-to-date. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: We might as well use the wwe.com profile as the source since it says the same thing as the YouTube video. I was the one who originally changed it to 340 due to the Super ShowDown video, but it appears they reverted back to the heavier weight. StaticVapor message me! 15:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- I initially reverted Vannyvis55's edit since the channel is not verified. However I've restored it to their version, for now. Someone need to update it with a video from a verified source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Omega
Hi there, STATicVapor! I apologize for not explicitly referencing the specific MOS guidelines in my edit summary.
Per MOS:1STOCC (i.e. When an abbreviation will be used in an article, first introduce it using the full expression . . .
), I believe if the company name is referenced repeatedly in the lead section, then it is important to annotate the abbreviation. However, if the first introduction of the name is its only presence in the lead, then I personally believe the abbreviation should wait until the body because it will be even more confusing to introduce a section specifically devoted to AEW and not introduce the abbreviation (e.g. "Omega signed with All Elite Wrestling. He made his debut for AEW on . . ."). I believe this is in line with MOS:INTRO (i.e. Editors should avoid lengthy paragraphs and overly specific descriptions – greater detail is saved for the body of the article . . .
) in that an abbreviation is overly specific for only one mention in the lead.
MOS:FIRST references abbreviations in the first sentence of the article, but it illustrates the same scenario where the abbreviation is utilized multiple times in the lead.
That said, there's not a definitive guideline, so I'd love to hear more of your thoughts on this. KyleJoan 20:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- @KyleJoan: Make sense to me thanks for the links :). I was honestly really just looking for information after I had saw someone recently add the abbreviations to a bunch of leads. StaticVapor message me! 08:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- No problem at all! Generally, I find that professional wrestlers’ article leads are either too brief or too elaborate. Omega’s is a good length, in my opinion. KyleJoan 10:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Combined reigns table
I read the PW/SG thing and no where does it say that people on the same amount of days but have more reigns are ranked higher and if you look at other articles that have combined reigns you will see that people with the same amount of days are ranked equally regardless of number of reigns. Browndog91 (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Browndog91: According to WP:PW/SG it should be sorted as "If two or more wrestlers are tied in days, priority is given in this order: most reigns, most successful defenses, alphabetical." You will find more discussion on Talk: List of WWE 24/7 Champions. StaticVapor message me! 20:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- I made a new section in Talk: List of WWE 24/7 Champions please comment. Browndog91 (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Lio Rush
Rush was a face last night. Why would he be facing heel Oney Lorcan to face heel Gulak? Last time I checked they don’t do heel vs. heel. Rush is a face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebelrick123 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Rebelrick123: Misplaced Pages does not accept assumptions based on events. Citations to reliable sources must be provided for face/heel turns. Anyways Oney is a babyface so I don't even know what else to say. StaticVapor message me! 17:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Humberto Carillo
Regarding the Humberto Carillo edit, I apologize for not using proper citations I had simply forgotten to add them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KallaroKay (talk • contribs) 21:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- @KallaroKay: No worries the message was mainly to teach you how, if you did not know how to. Also remember to sign your posts when you post on user or article talk pages. Thanks and happy editing. StaticVapor message me! 22:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
About The Viking Raiders (professional wrestling) undiscussed page move
Hi StatVap, and thanks for your message. I've asked for assistance here. Pete "why is the part of my brain that should remember where I left my wallet and car keys yesterday instead a concise history of Western visual art from 1850 to 1950?" AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for dedicating time to this @Shirt58:. I appreciate it. StaticVapor message me! 21:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- No problem, always happy to help out. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 13:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
o.o
Я си еби майката ве урод! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vzehasinami (talk • contribs) 12:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Apology
I would like to apologize for claiming that Bryan turned face without proof backing it up. I promise not to do that again. MaxRocker264 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Gable
Chad Gable is a face. He’s been a face for weeks now. Watch the show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebelrick123 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Rebelrick123: I am aware. However, that sort of stuff is always up to opinion. So when you add face/heel turns you have to cite a source. Also WP:SIGN your talk page posts. StaticVapor message me! 22:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's true, he's right, Chad Gable did recently announce he did say he wanted people to refer to him as Shorty Gable, as it was directly coming from Mr. McMahon himself when he, Mr. McMahon, said directly that he wanted Chad Gable to come up with a new ring name and actually legitimately made fun of Chad Gable over Chad Gable 's height. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 21:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
changes
Hey! Just wanted to say that you missed the second episode of Ridiculousness he was on. Season 13 Episode 11 Machine Gun Kelly IIMadderzzzzz (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Regarding “Shorty Gable”
At the 2019 Hell in a Cell PPV, King Corbin dubbed Chad Gable as “Shorty Gable” and after Gable won he was announced as “Shorty Gable”. People have been making edits on Gable’s Misplaced Pages page adding the name, claimimg that since it was announced it is a ringname. KallaroKay (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- @KallaroKay: Sorry I was largly gone for over a week. In case of disputes I would suggest taking discussion to the article talk page or WT:PW. I haven't reviewed the article yet, but it appears a discussion was started in the article talk page. What a dumb name change though. StaticVapor message me! 22:38, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Charlotte is a heel again?
I recently edited Charlotte's article because I thought she turned heel when she elbowed Becky Lynch last night on RAW
Not long after, some user deleted my edit
- @HassanTheScumbob: Do you have a source for face/heel turns? A reliable source is required. StaticVapor message me! 18:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
I found one on Smarkoutmoment's list of heel and face turns. Is it okay if I post the link HassanTheScumbob (talk) 22:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- @HassanTheScumbob: You will find a list of reliable and unreliable sources at WP:PW/RS. Smarkoutmoment would not qualify as a reliable source. StaticVapor message me! 22:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Unsourced content
Dear STATic Vapor, I will put references for articles relating wrestlers. Please let me know when I make a reference if ti's great. Also if its read or something you can edit it. Kingzwest (talk) 02:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
From, Kingzwest
- @Kingzwest: Hey why did you add unsourced content to Dusty Rhodes (wrestler), Kamala (wrestler) and Junkyard Dog following this message? StaticVapor message me! 07:32, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Triple H
Hi, Much Love as a friend, It's not, everybody knows Triple H did wrestle in 1991 and 1994,under Terra Ryzin' he says December 11, 1998 when he asked Owen Hart a question and Owen asked why he never went back to WCW and he brought it up when he said what he said about hating someone for throwing Alex Wright under the bus about something from the night before the night before his, Triple H 's ONLY ONLY WCW match — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 06:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Dude, Much Love as a friend, It's true on Triple H ] (talk) 06:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
The Rock
Dude, Hi, Much Love as a friend, On The Rock, it really is true that The Rock actually, no lie, no joke, did appear that day on The Kelly Clarkson show in August, as You see, the week before, I kid you not, and it repeats again the day before, Kevin Hart was supposed to appear on The Kelly Clarkson show and due to his, Kevin Hart 's accident, he Texted The Rock himself and The Rock actually legitimately offered to fill in for Kevin Hart and ended up appearing on The Kelly Clarkson show, Ellen DeGenres herself vouched for it the day he also appeared on her, Ellen DeGenere's show. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 21:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Matt Hardy
I don't understand why you removed it, do I need to add where the videos come from? I think I already said that they are at the end of the you don't understand videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by X43C (talk • contribs) 17:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello STATicVapor,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 812 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Misplaced Pages article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Misplaced Pages or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Fredericknapoleon005
Hi STATicVapor, please look into the constant vandalism by @Fredericknapoleon005: on Jay-Z. Isaacsorry (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ric Flair
Hi Much Love as a friend, It's true, Ric Flair really was always called "Ramblin' " Ric Rhodes, Tully Blanchard said as did Harley Race May 10, 1984. Telley~~ (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs)
Hi Much Love as a friend, It really is true on Ric Flair, "That 70s Guy" Mike Awesome said May 4 1991 and repeated in November 1998 on Nitro when he accidentally called Glacier by his real name before a match and brought it up when he makes a joke about The 4 Horsemen. ] (talk) 03:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Misplaced Pages.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The Rock
Dude, Much Love as a friend, Do you have an Instagram account so I can show you something on The Rock? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TelleyTell (talk • contribs) 01:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
A post that i made on roman reigns
I would like to know what this post or edit was for roman that i did. I can not recall anything that i posted. And because of that someone might have used my name for the post. And now i cant do anything on wiki. So please enlighten me on this edit please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:B40A:B900:B43F:D31E:67DB:3E4A (talk) 04:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Misplaced Pages:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Merry!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! | |
Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Happy Holidays!
Hello STATicVapor: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Hello,
I re-edited the entry you noted with the credited songwriters listed here:
https://open.spotify.com/track/4Tk9QvtwwOj2Ah9E8ahutZ?si=nfbqz4qaQrmSOqqKeOmUyQ
Please let me know if there's anything else you need.
Thanks, Steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realstacktrace (talk • contribs) 20:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Realstacktrace (talk) 20:24, 19 January 2020 (UTC)01/19/2020
Kenny Omega RfC
Hey there, STATicVapor! I hope you've been well. I remember we had a discussion regarding the use of abbreviations in professional wrestling BLP lead sections, specifically over at the Kenny Omega article. I'm now writing because I wanted to get your take on an active RfC on the article's talk page regarding its lead section. I'm really curious about your view on the matter, so if you would like to state it to help the discussion, it would be highly appreciated. Cheers! KyleJoan 18:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
getting a wikipedia made
How you doing im a artist trying to get a wikapedia page made. i have several google news articles and a real fanbase. I also have a newspaper article being written by my hometown covering my story as we speak. I have over a million plays across all platforms and I have 15 thousand instagram followers and with in that 200+ are verified users.Ive worked with grammy award winning and platinum producers and have a real story even before my success in music.
Above is my google search link were i have a creditable google knowledge panel and all my music. if you could give me a reply on how i can get this done id be very grateful. My artist name is "Shay Bxxgie". Website- shaybxxgie.com .Social media @shaybxxgie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaybxxgie (talk • contribs) 18:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020
Hello STATicVapor,
- Source Guide Discussion
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
- Redirects
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
- Discussions and Resources
- There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
- A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
- A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
- A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.
- Refresher
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Looking for Some Help
Hey, StaticVapor, this one is a bit weird, but I'd like your help with something. There's a user who keeps making unhelpful alterations to the List of Impact Wrestling Personnel page, specifically attempting to remove Bhupinder Singh every 2 or 3 months with no source outside of "I haven't seen him wrestle on TV." Now, Bhupinder is still there, in training, and I'm beginning to get extremely frustrated with this user's edits. What would the best course of action be in regards to getting this ongoing issue resolved? I'm coming to you simply because I know you're an experienced user especially when it comes to professional wrestling articles, so I figured I'd ask rather than have it become uncivil and so on. SkylerLovefist (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Stop sending me messages
Before sending your malicious messages, first check the edit date and then rate me "vandalism", it is not the first time that you do it without checking the MLW webpage, the MLW roster page is very very active, only in this case you can check my edition date April 3rd, and you just now April 14th waited for Salina to return to the roster to send me your message of bad coexistence on wikipedia. I never edit "unsupported" or "vandalism" as you imply without proof, look here https://web.archive.org/web/20200402001141/https://mlw.com/fighters/MLW April 2nd, where is Salina? if you didnt know MLW in some cases works by dates so before claiming, verify and do it in time that the one that is very bad position is you.
User:FranXBSCUser talk:FranXBSC
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello STATicVapor,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Wednesday Night War
A bot removed the scoreboard for how many wins NXT and AEW had in the 18-49 demographic. Can you get somebody to put it back or is it too unnecessary to do so HassanTheScumbob (talk) 01:04, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
How are you mate?
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: Good! Unfortunately probably will not be editing much or at all for the near future. Appreciate the thoughts though, truely hope all is well with you! StaticVapor message me! 00:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks man. I was out for 4 months, April to August. Was unwell, then got busy. Hope everything is well with you too! - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Damian Priest
Hey !
I want to bring it to your concern that I have been editing the page "Damian Priest" by updating the article and citing all the relevant sources every week. This helps in maintaining its continuity. I was doing this for around 8 months and I have welcomed all the corrections and edits.
However, today out of nowhere, the user User:Etacarinaee has removed most of the content that I have updated every week.
This user has a record of removing information from other biographies as well, and inspite of the warnings, the user continues to do so, without any relevant explanation.
You understand that doing this every week takes consistency and patience to jot down every detail to make pages more informative. Please check Damian Priest page's edit history. If the edit made by User:Etacarinaee is justified (though I still am not convinced), please let me know what is wrong. I would humbly welcome constructive criticism.
Thanking You.
User:NautiyalSiddharth98 NautiyalSiddharth98 (talk) 10:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi NautiyalSiddharth98, I'll take the liberty of replying in STATicVapor's stead. For a start, I'm not in favour of Etacarinaee's large removal of sourced content, so you have my support on this matter. However, I'm not fully against Etacarinaee's concerns. His/her main point, which I agree with, is that the article was overly detailed, which is generally discouraged in encyclopedias. I wouldn't remove as much content as she did though. You might find it helpful to read Misplaced Pages:Too_much_detail. The article has evolved quite a bit since you sent this message; did you manage to reinstate content that Etacarinaee had removed? If you need anything, feel free to contact me. Walwal20 06:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @NautiyalSiddharth98: Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help. If I choose to edit in the future, this page is in my watchlist so I will see it. StaticVapor message me! 00:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Requesting assistance
Dear STATicVapor,
I'm writing to you because you have contributed to The Mighty Don't Kneel and Melbourne City Wrestling.
I'd like to ask for your help in related articles.
I'm anticipating that my latest edit in Hartley Jackson and The Mighty Don't Kneel will be continuously reverted by a certain someone.
If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could assess the situation and verify if their reverts are legitimate.
If you think they are not, please boldly revert their reverts (in The Mighty Don't Kneel too).
Here's the whole story, if you would like:
The thing is, Jammo85 states that Hartley Jackson was a member of the group The Mighty Don't Kneel, and has added this information to the respective articles.
However, Addicted4517 reverted their edits here + here, and here.
By the time of the AfD discussion Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Hartley_Jackson_(3rd_nomination), I was uninvolved with these articles. But I researched the topic and concluded that Jammo's sources were sufficient, so I selectively reverted Addicted's revert of Jammo's edit (here).
Addicted reverted my revert here.
The discussion went on the AfD itself.
Addicted's main complaint was the reliability of the sources.
With some effort I have collected many sources, including official ones here and here (they are archived, so takes some time to load), that mention Hartley being part of TMDK. The full list of sources I collected will go as footnotes: .
Addicted was not satisfied, and reverted my edits again here and here.
Best, Walwal20 06:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Damian_Priest&action=history.
{{cite web}}
:|first1=
missing|last1=
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help) - "Hostile Takeover 2016". Melbourne City Wrestling. June 18, 2016. Retrieved October 6, 2020.
- "Matches announced for REVOLUTION on Friday, May 6th". Wrestle Rampage. April 11, 2016. Retrieved October 6, 2020. See also their ad on social media .
- Greer, Jamie (2020-05-05). "The Mighty, Too: Shane Thorne & Brendan Vink Continue TMDK Legacy". Last Word on Pro Wrestling. Retrieved 2020-09-26.
- "List of TMDK Stable Matches". Cage Match. Retrieved October 6, 2020.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Other sources on this piece of information are: , which is an article from a podcast on wrestling, which mentions Hartley as being part of TMDK; and also , which are official match advertisements from Wrestling Rampage, and show Hartley in the TMDK team. All links were accessed on October 7, 2020.
- @Walwal20: Sorry to say I do not really edit at all anymore. Thanks for coming to me and wish I could help look in to this. If I do I will try to take time to look into the issue that is Australian wrestling articles. StaticVapor message me! 00:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!
Happy Diwali!!! | ||
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello STATicVapor,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Kanye West studio albums GTC
I have given you credit on the nominations page; care to leave any comments? --K. Peake 08:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello STATicVapor, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Happy New Year, STATicVapor!
Happy New Year!STATicVapor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:20, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Brotha Lynch Hung update
Do you remember what information was newly available when you did this? Yappy2bhere (talk) 00:34, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello STATicVapor,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Misplaced Pages and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 backlog drive
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Misplaced Pages page creation
Hello, I’m curious as to if you would consider creating a Misplaced Pages page for a artist. And if so what info would you need provided, and any fees associated. 71.114.61.206 (talk) 20:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022
Hello STATicVapor,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 812 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 848 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022
Hello STATicVapor,
- Backlog status
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
- Backlog drive
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
- TIP – New school articles
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Misplaced Pages's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
- Misc
There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 15600 articles, as of 02:00, 28 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
- Notes
- not including another ~6,000 redirects
- The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022
Hello STATicVapor,
- Backlog status
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
- Coordination
- MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
- Open letter to the WMF
- The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
- TIP - Reviewing by subject
- Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
- New reviewers
- The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
- Reminders
- Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
- If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Misplaced Pages notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing
{{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page. - If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
- To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
NPP message
Hi STATicVapor,
- Invitation
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
NPP Award for 2019
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022
Hello STATicVapor,
Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.
Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.
Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.
Suggestions:
- There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
- Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
- Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
- This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.
Backlog:
Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you are no longer very active on Misplaced Pages or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Category:Singlechart usages for Flanders Urban has been nominated for renaming
Category:Singlechart usages for Flanders Urban has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Lil Snupe
Hi there. I know this was a really long time ago, but you started this RFC. Then there was a second one, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe (2nd nomination). The article has been created again. I'm not sure how much new material can be added about a teenager who died several years ago. I'm wondering if the article has been improved to the point of notability. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello STATicVapor,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Re: All of Me
I’ve edited this disambiguation page to remove any reference to Ruth Etting. I’ve found no reference in any google search to associate her with the popular 1931 song. The song’s Misplaced Pages article doesn’t mention her, and her own Misplaced Pages article doesn’t mention the song. If you can provide a reliable reference to revert my edit, please do. If not, I regret that Misplaced Pages’s rules of civility prevent me from finishing this communique properly. Tapered (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello STATicVapor,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp on IRC.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello STATicVapor,
The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.
Reminders:
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Funk Volume
Template:Funk Volume has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello STATicVapor,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello STATicVapor:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
आपके लेख भारत आदिवासी पार्टी में
आपके लेख भारत आदिवासी पार्टी में अध्यक्ष, महासचिव, कोषाध्यक्ष का लेख add करे 2409:4052:D8A:7FC4:14AD:5C6F:5B18:6B33 (talk) 08:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Keep-on-Ridin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Keep-on-Ridin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of The Main Event (Chamillionaire song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Main Event (Chamillionaire song) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Main Event (Chamillionaire song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Roasted (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Doe B at the 2013 BET Hip Hop Awards.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Doe B at the 2013 BET Hip Hop Awards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories: