Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:22, 23 March 2014 editFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,983 edits merge: oppose← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:58, 29 December 2024 edit undoA.Musketeer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users513 edits Edits 
(209 intermediate revisions by 63 users not shown)
Line 33: Line 33:
|action5result=not promoted |action5result=not promoted
|action5oldid=580139908 |action5oldid=580139908

|currentstatus=GA
|action6=GAR
|action6date=08:29, 28 August 2020
|action6link=Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/GA2
|action6result=delisted
|action6oldid=975204726

|currentstatus=DGA
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProjectBanners|1=
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=GA|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Cold-War=y|Pakistani=yes|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Cold-War=y|Pakistani=yes}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=GA|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|class=GA|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Bangladesh|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Pakistan|class=GA|importance=Mid|History=yes}} {{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=Mid|History=yes}}
{{WikiProject India|class=GA|importance=low|history=yes|history-importance=mid}} {{WikiProject India|importance=low|history=yes|history-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Stfg|date=24 February 2012}} {{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Stfg|date=24 February 2012}}
}} }}
{{contentious topics/talk notice|ipa}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K |maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 2 |counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 3
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(20d) |algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=90 |units=days }}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=/Archive index |target=/Archive index
Line 62: Line 68:
}} }}


== merge == == Repetition of Paragraph ==

{{edit extended-protected|Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War|answered=yes}}
The first paragraph of the International Reactions header is repeated twice. ] (]) 14:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

*Done--'''<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><span style="color:#AC9F06">❯❯❯</span>]<sup>&nbsp;]</sup></i>''' 16:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

== Not All ==

Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. ] (]) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

==Edits==
{{Ping|Nomian}} Do you have any sources to dispute the content you are so far? Just citing the lack of existence of a talk page discussion is not enough. See ]. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
:I have restored the before the edit wars began. This version is old and much more stable than the I reverted. There are a lot of issues with the reverted version, some of which I am explaining below:
:The version says "Bengali Muslims were targeted in this pogrom due to supposedly retaining Hindu traditions." That is a blatant ] since there is no source that says "Bengali Muslims" were "targeted", it is the Hindus who were targeted according to the sources. The quotation from the cited source says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers", yes they were raped but the targets were essentially Hindus. see Islam, M. Rafiqul (2019). ''National Trials of International Crimes in Bangladesh: Transitional Justice as Reflected in Judgments''. BRILL. pp. 175. ISBN 978-90-04-38938-0. quote: "The Pakistani occupation army and its local collaborators targeted mostly the Hindu women and girls for rape and sexual violence."

:The version also says "Bengali Muslim men were targets of rape by West Pakistani soldiers as well." That is another ], as I said, there is no source that says Bengali Muslims were the targets. The cited source here says "Oral testimonies I have gathered suggest that Bengali Muslim men were raped", this is a personal opinion of the author, and thus ], fails ]. Yet, the source in no part says that they were the "targets".


:I would also recommend reading '']'' by ], a breakthrough research on this genocide where he states, ''there was mounting evidence that among the Bengalis, the Hindu minority was doubly marked out for persecution.'' Essentially, it is the targeting of the Hindus that makes it a case for genocide. You can also read a review of the book by '']'', . ] (]) 01:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
This can easily fit in the Bangladesh Liberation war article. Why the heck do these subtopics have separate articles of their own? it's not encyclopedic to make articles out of subtopics <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::What you recommend has no bearing on this article. You admit that Bengali Muslim women were raped (which is what the citation says), though you have omitted this entirely from the article.
*'''Oppose'''. These events easily pass ] ] (]) 06:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
::The University of Florida Press reference says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers to "cleanse" them of their alleged tendencies to uphold their Hindu traditions." Yet, you removed that as well. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 04:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
*Also per ] Articles ought to be around the 50kb size, Bangladesh Liberation War is already well over that at 88,791. ] (]) 10:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
:::As I see it, Nomnian and A.Musketeer appear to wanting to portray this topic as a religious conflict, when it was in fact an ethnic one. The citations that were added to the article meet the WP:RS policy and if the wording could be improved, that's fine. But to delete the citations and content entirely reeks of POV pushing and censorship. ] (]) 16:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Support- other article missed out on huge part of contemporaneous consequences and antecedents of conflict. And it is crucial and directly related to the matter. Look at articles on controversial or religious topics easily supersede the informal 50 kb norm. We can try merging and if it doesn't flow smoothly we can partition it once again. Go for it OP I'll provide assistance to my capability. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->{{spa|Raiders88}}
::::Leaving the ] aside, personal observations are not ], much less ]. @Nxcrypto: are you sure that the award-winning book by Gary Bass is not relevant here? It is in fact the most authoritative source you could find on this topic. The first two sentences in the lead says ''"members of the Pakistani military and Razakar paramilitary force raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bengali women and girls in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape. Most of the rape victims of the Pakistani Army and its allies were Hindu women."'' It perfectly states that Bengali women of all religions were raped but Hindus were disproportionately affected which is aligned with what the sources say. I would also quote the '''' of ], ''"In our view there is a '''strong''' prima facie case that the crime of genocide was committed against the group comprising the Hindu population of East Bengal."'' ] (]) 21:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' - <This is a huge article on an important topic and merging it to a paragraph size would in essence destroy it. Since this is a valid and significant topic, not to mention that it's a Misplaced Pages featured article candidate, the POV motives behind this peculiar anonymous request to merge, must be taken into account as well.> ] (]) 02:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
:::::A.Musketeer, leave false warnings on my talk page all that you want, but at the end of the day, you have removed material that talks about how non-Hindus were affected from this article. And the citations that you removed are reliable. ] (]) 23:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' It meets GNG criteria. It is the subject of focused scholarly literature, ie. literature about the mass rape carried out before and during the 1971 war in Bangladesh, not generally about the war. The reliable sources have decided it is an independent topic. Our hands are tied. In any case, it is too late in the day to attempt such a move. The article has already been to ], where it received the attention of more editors than this page move will elicit. Besides, there is precedent on Misplaced Pages: see ], ], ], ]. ]] 09:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
::::::I am not surprised that you have nothing to say about the sources and quotations I have discussed here. Pushing a POV that undermines the genocidal claims by mispresenting the sources, adding ] to the lead, and non-] sources would always be removed. ] (]) 00:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:58, 29 December 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Former good articleRape during the Bangladesh Liberation War was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 2, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
September 25, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 6, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 28, 2020Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconHuman rights High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / South Asia / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBangladesh Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
WikiProject iconPakistan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
WikiProject iconIndia: History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 February 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.


Repetition of Paragraph

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The first paragraph of the International Reactions header is repeated twice. Zargham Ali (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Not All

Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Edits

@Nomian: Do you have any sources to dispute the content you are reverting so far? Just citing the lack of existence of a talk page discussion is not enough. See WP:STONEWALL. Nxcrypto Message 00:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I have restored the status quo version before the edit wars began. This version is more than a year old and much more stable than the version I reverted. There are a lot of issues with the reverted version, some of which I am explaining below:
The version says "Bengali Muslims were targeted in this pogrom due to supposedly retaining Hindu traditions." That is a blatant WP:OR since there is no source that says "Bengali Muslims" were "targeted", it is the Hindus who were targeted according to the sources. The quotation from the cited source says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers", yes they were raped but the targets were essentially Hindus. see Islam, M. Rafiqul (2019). National Trials of International Crimes in Bangladesh: Transitional Justice as Reflected in Judgments. BRILL. pp. 175. ISBN 978-90-04-38938-0. quote: "The Pakistani occupation army and its local collaborators targeted mostly the Hindu women and girls for rape and sexual violence."
The version also says "Bengali Muslim men were targets of rape by West Pakistani soldiers as well." That is another WP:OR, as I said, there is no source that says Bengali Muslims were the targets. The cited source here says "Oral testimonies I have gathered suggest that Bengali Muslim men were raped", this is a personal opinion of the author, and thus WP:PRIMARY, fails WP:HISTRS. Yet, the source in no part says that they were the "targets".
I would also recommend reading The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide by Gary J. Bass, a breakthrough research on this genocide where he states, there was mounting evidence that among the Bengalis, the Hindu minority was doubly marked out for persecution. Essentially, it is the targeting of the Hindus that makes it a case for genocide. You can also read a review of the book by PTI, here. A.Musketeer (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
What you recommend has no bearing on this article. You admit that Bengali Muslim women were raped (which is what the citation says), though you have omitted this entirely from the article.
The University of Florida Press reference says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers to "cleanse" them of their alleged tendencies to uphold their Hindu traditions." Yet, you removed that as well. Nxcrypto Message 04:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
As I see it, Nomnian and A.Musketeer appear to wanting to portray this topic as a religious conflict, when it was in fact an ethnic one. The citations that were added to the article meet the WP:RS policy and if the wording could be improved, that's fine. But to delete the citations and content entirely reeks of POV pushing and censorship. desmay (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Leaving the aspersions aside, personal observations are not WP:RS, much less WP:HISTRS. @Nxcrypto: are you sure that the award-winning book by Gary Bass is not relevant here? It is in fact the most authoritative source you could find on this topic. The first two sentences in the lead says "members of the Pakistani military and Razakar paramilitary force raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bengali women and girls in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape. Most of the rape victims of the Pakistani Army and its allies were Hindu women." It perfectly states that Bengali women of all religions were raped but Hindus were disproportionately affected which is aligned with what the sources say. I would also quote the East Pakistan Staff Study (1972) of International Commission of Jurists, "In our view there is a strong prima facie case that the crime of genocide was committed against the group comprising the Hindu population of East Bengal." A.Musketeer (talk) 21:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
A.Musketeer, leave false warnings on my talk page all that you want, but at the end of the day, you have removed material that talks about how non-Hindus were affected from this article. And the citations that you removed are reliable. desmay (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
I am not surprised that you have nothing to say about the sources and quotations I have discussed here. Pushing a POV that undermines the genocidal claims by mispresenting the sources, adding WP:UNDUE to the lead, and non-WP:HISTRS sources would always be removed. A.Musketeer (talk) 00:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: