Revision as of 09:22, 23 March 2014 editFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,983 edits →merge: oppose← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:58, 29 December 2024 edit undoA.Musketeer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users513 edits →Edits |
(209 intermediate revisions by 63 users not shown) |
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
|
|action5result=not promoted |
|
|action5result=not promoted |
|
|action5oldid=580139908 |
|
|action5oldid=580139908 |
|
|
|
⚫ |
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|
|
|action6=GAR |
|
|
|action6date=08:29, 28 August 2020 |
|
|
|action6link=Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/GA2 |
|
|
|action6result=delisted |
|
|
|action6oldid=975204726 |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|currentstatus=DGA |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBanners|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Human rights|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Cold-War=y|Pakistani=yes|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|Cold-War=y|Pakistani=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Bangladesh|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|class=GA|importance=Mid|History=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pakistan|importance=Mid|History=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject India|class=GA|importance=low|history=yes|history-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|history=yes|history-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Stfg|date=24 February 2012}} |
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Stfg|date=24 February 2012}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{contentious topics/talk notice|ipa}} |
|
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|counter = 2 |
|
|counter = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(20d) |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=90 |units=days }} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|target=/Archive index |
Line 62: |
Line 68: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== merge == |
|
== Repetition of Paragraph == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War|answered=yes}} |
|
|
The first paragraph of the International Reactions header is repeated twice. ] (]) 14:51, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*Done--'''<i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><span style="color:#AC9F06">❯❯❯</span>]<sup> ]</sup></i>''' 16:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Not All == |
|
|
|
|
|
Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. ] (]) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Edits== |
|
|
{{Ping|Nomian}} Do you have any sources to dispute the content you are so far? Just citing the lack of existence of a talk page discussion is not enough. See ]. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:I have restored the before the edit wars began. This version is old and much more stable than the I reverted. There are a lot of issues with the reverted version, some of which I am explaining below: |
|
|
:The version says "Bengali Muslims were targeted in this pogrom due to supposedly retaining Hindu traditions." That is a blatant ] since there is no source that says "Bengali Muslims" were "targeted", it is the Hindus who were targeted according to the sources. The quotation from the cited source says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers", yes they were raped but the targets were essentially Hindus. see Islam, M. Rafiqul (2019). ''National Trials of International Crimes in Bangladesh: Transitional Justice as Reflected in Judgments''. BRILL. pp. 175. ISBN 978-90-04-38938-0. quote: "The Pakistani occupation army and its local collaborators targeted mostly the Hindu women and girls for rape and sexual violence." |
|
|
|
|
|
:The version also says "Bengali Muslim men were targets of rape by West Pakistani soldiers as well." That is another ], as I said, there is no source that says Bengali Muslims were the targets. The cited source here says "Oral testimonies I have gathered suggest that Bengali Muslim men were raped", this is a personal opinion of the author, and thus ], fails ]. Yet, the source in no part says that they were the "targets". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I would also recommend reading '']'' by ], a breakthrough research on this genocide where he states, ''there was mounting evidence that among the Bengalis, the Hindu minority was doubly marked out for persecution.'' Essentially, it is the targeting of the Hindus that makes it a case for genocide. You can also read a review of the book by '']'', . ] (]) 01:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
This can easily fit in the Bangladesh Liberation war article. Why the heck do these subtopics have separate articles of their own? it's not encyclopedic to make articles out of subtopics <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
::What you recommend has no bearing on this article. You admit that Bengali Muslim women were raped (which is what the citation says), though you have omitted this entirely from the article. |
|
*'''Oppose'''. These events easily pass ] ] (]) 06:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::The University of Florida Press reference says "Muslim Bengali women have been raped by Pakistani soldiers to "cleanse" them of their alleged tendencies to uphold their Hindu traditions." Yet, you removed that as well. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 04:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
*Also per ] Articles ought to be around the 50kb size, Bangladesh Liberation War is already well over that at 88,791. ] (]) 10:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::As I see it, Nomnian and A.Musketeer appear to wanting to portray this topic as a religious conflict, when it was in fact an ethnic one. The citations that were added to the article meet the WP:RS policy and if the wording could be improved, that's fine. But to delete the citations and content entirely reeks of POV pushing and censorship. ] (]) 16:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Support- other article missed out on huge part of contemporaneous consequences and antecedents of conflict. And it is crucial and directly related to the matter. Look at articles on controversial or religious topics easily supersede the informal 50 kb norm. We can try merging and if it doesn't flow smoothly we can partition it once again. Go for it OP I'll provide assistance to my capability. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->{{spa|Raiders88}} |
|
|
|
::::Leaving the ] aside, personal observations are not ], much less ]. @Nxcrypto: are you sure that the award-winning book by Gary Bass is not relevant here? It is in fact the most authoritative source you could find on this topic. The first two sentences in the lead says ''"members of the Pakistani military and Razakar paramilitary force raped between 200,000 and 400,000 Bengali women and girls in a systematic campaign of genocidal rape. Most of the rape victims of the Pakistani Army and its allies were Hindu women."'' It perfectly states that Bengali women of all religions were raped but Hindus were disproportionately affected which is aligned with what the sources say. I would also quote the '''' of ], ''"In our view there is a '''strong''' prima facie case that the crime of genocide was committed against the group comprising the Hindu population of East Bengal."'' ] (]) 21:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
*'''Oppose''' - <This is a huge article on an important topic and merging it to a paragraph size would in essence destroy it. Since this is a valid and significant topic, not to mention that it's a Misplaced Pages featured article candidate, the POV motives behind this peculiar anonymous request to merge, must be taken into account as well.> ] (]) 02:39, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::::A.Musketeer, leave false warnings on my talk page all that you want, but at the end of the day, you have removed material that talks about how non-Hindus were affected from this article. And the citations that you removed are reliable. ] (]) 23:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
*'''Oppose''' It meets GNG criteria. It is the subject of focused scholarly literature, ie. literature about the mass rape carried out before and during the 1971 war in Bangladesh, not generally about the war. The reliable sources have decided it is an independent topic. Our hands are tied. In any case, it is too late in the day to attempt such a move. The article has already been to ], where it received the attention of more editors than this page move will elicit. Besides, there is precedent on Misplaced Pages: see ], ], ], ]. ]] 09:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::::::I am not surprised that you have nothing to say about the sources and quotations I have discussed here. Pushing a POV that undermines the genocidal claims by mispresenting the sources, adding ] to the lead, and non-] sources would always be removed. ] (]) 00:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
Not all Imams and Mullahs said that in support of Pakistan, Many Imams and other religious scholars supported the Bangladesh Liberation Cause or condemned the assault. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2024 (UTC)