| Revision as of 15:15, 25 March 2014 edit39.32.206.224 (talk) →Infobox budget figures discussion← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 16:32, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,440 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| (48 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ⚫ |
{{WP India|class=start|importance=low|cinema=yes}} |
|
|
{{WP Film|class=start|Indian=yes|needs-image=no}} |
|
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|cinema=yes|cinema-importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Film|Indian=yes}} |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|counter = 1 |
|
|counter = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(20d) |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Total Siyapaa/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Total Siyapaa/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=MiszaBot I |age=90 |units=days }} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Abuse by Socks. == |
|
|
|
|
|
This page has been the target of socks of {{Noping|LanguageXpert}} – {{Noping|MusicPoineer}}, {{Noping|Xcrescent9}}, {{Noping|Morexbine}}, {{Noping|Archtexlic}} and {{Noping|Ibnebatutaji}}. They attempted to suppress negative reviews, BO collections and were even successful in doing so. Their disruption has left the page in tatters and some Good-faithed editors like {{U|Vvarkey}}, {{U|ZORDANLIGHTER}} and {{U|Whistlingwoods}} harassed. – ] (]) 07:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
: Yup, so it's important to ''respond'' to their actions correctly and not get ''yourself'' blocked <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span> 08:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive#14_March_2014--] (]) 15:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Apology needed from Administrators for trusting socks of LanguageXpert== |
|
|
|
|
|
I want all administrators(<span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span> ,<span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span>, <font color="#191970">]</font><font color="#696969">]</font> ,]''''' <sup>]</sup>,]) to apologize to me for not trusting my reliable sources and giving unnecessary and pointless importance to the the socks created by one user.] (])'''Is one and only good faith Administrator'''.'''If users make mistakes then they are punished but when Administrators make mistake then they should also repent'''. '''All those users who were constantly arguing with me are actually one person and these accounts are blocked by wikipedia'''. The hero of this movie is a Pakistani and LanguageXpert is a pakistani so he is unable to tolerate negative reviews and low box office reception in India. One thing is certain any new account which will favour the movie is a sock of ] (]).] (]),] (]),] (]),] (]) and ] '''are one person'''-something administrators never understood, now you powerful administrators check this user account page and you will find them blocked byWikipedia .--] (]) 08:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)] |
|
|
|
|
|
: There's no apology needed from me: you were TOLD to stop removing text from this talkpage because it was against policy, yet you continued to do it. I'm sorry you felt you were somehow above the rules, and that you forced me to block you. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span> 11:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
I have no regret that I removed his text. as he was a sock and i was aware of that. I was frustrated that this LanguageXpert is using socks like Xcrescent9 to avoid the truth. At that time I didn't know how to report a sock. Which I learned yesterday and reported them as sock and I will track this LanguageXpert wherever he exists. I can smell him through his comments. I removed his worthless comments in good faith] (]) 16:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::"If users make mistakes then they are punished..." A block is '''never''' used as a punishment. See ]. <font color="#191970">]</font><font color="#696969">]</font> 15:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
::: Exactly. I've never issued a punishment block before, and I certainly did not this time. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span> 16:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: You made no such assertion of sockpuppetry in your edit summary. My one revert here was in response to you made with the edit summary "XCRESCENT has accepted in hid previous edits that he was wrong about his objections . So I believe his discussions will create confusion for administrators. I am removing All discussions related to his irrelevant objections". Discussions may be archived but should not be deleted; that's why I restored about 3k of text. |
|
|
:My other recent edits have been technical edits, adding {{tl|reflist-talk}} templates to better display the references included in comments. —''']''' (]) 19:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
This link is for good faith administrators even though the section was removed but it can be viewed in revision history https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Whistlingwoods&oldid=600252820#You_respond_too_slowly] (]) 09:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy of master sock https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive#03_November_2012 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Infobox budget figures discussion == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== this movie follows the same plot as the spanish movie "only human" or "seres queridos" == |
|
Hey everyone. Since it seems like some sort of edit war is imminent, I started a topic on the budget figures to discuss and come to a consensus on what the figures should be. It seems to me that at least one of the sources supports 8 crore as the budget figures. If you want to remove these sourced figures, you should have a good reason for doing so. – ] <sup>]</font></sup><sup>]</font></sup> 15:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
: I 100% agree with FenixFeather. ] (]) 15:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |
|
should there be some reference? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 05:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)</small> |
.svg)
