Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:00, 26 March 2014 editFlat Out (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,822 edits →User:Connor2278 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: Protected): request← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:36, 25 December 2024 edit undoJasca Ducato (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,533 edits →User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}{{/Header}}]
<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|{{pp|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
{{pp-move|small=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}} |archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 240 |counter = 490
|algo = old(48h) |algo = old(2d)
|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
|key = c95548204df2d271954945f82c43354a
|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
}}</noinclude>
}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid="3741656" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators&#039; noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
<!-- NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==
NOTE: THE *BOTTOM* IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
== ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinite block) ==
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|PaleoFile}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Space Jam}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Jdogno5}}


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->
#
#
#
#


Previous version reverted to:


<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts (March 18–20):
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


Editor was blocked for 31 hours by ]:


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
Diffs of the user's reverts (March 21):


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
#
#


Editor was blocked for 60 hours by ]: '''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''


] | ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Diffs of the user's reverts (March 24):
*Both users have been {{AN3|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
#
*:Those users and {{userlinks|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
*:1.
*:2.
*:3.
*:4.
*:5.
*:6.
*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] | ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==
Disruptive editing on the article talk page:
#


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Lindy Li}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Napoleonjosephine2020}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and ] #
#
#
#


<u>Comments:</u> <br />


This is the third spate of warring after two blocks. I think a lengthy block is required this time. The issues have been highlighted on the talk page and the sensible thing to do would have been to work through them and supply the requested sourcing, and there isn't much any of can do if he simply refuses to co-operate. ] (]) 04:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
:Indefinitely blocked.&mdash;](]) 04:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: No violation) ==


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Shakira}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Filucz2004}}


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch.
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
User continues to edit-war over edits to the ] article, and giving little to no reason or explanation for why, other than that the edits are "repulsive". User was previously blocked for edit-warring, and when I tried speaking to said user, they ignored my talk page comments and continued on editing. Two other editors also tried communicating with said-user, and ignored them as well. He also called the edits "untrue", but all that was reverted was the infobox and how the date of birth was represented. Neither edit was untrue. User also changed simple changes to how the references were appeared, with "30em", which is what is most accustomed used in articles now. User is obviously only here for self agenda is appears and will continue their edits until they've been blocked once more. And given a look at their talkpage, a severe case of disruptive editing is at hand. ''']''' ] 12:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# (User explanation: ''Revert, totally untrue.'')
# (User explanation: ''STOP!!!!!'')
# (User explanation: ''UNTRUE AGAIN!!!!!!!!!'')
# (User explanation: ''THIS IS REPULSIVE EDITION'')


Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. ] • ] • ] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? ] (]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
::@]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand ] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. ] • ] • ] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
# ] tried asking why they've been making their edits, with no response.
:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. ] (]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
# ] tried once again contacting user, with no response.
::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. ] • ] • ] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
# I tried contacting user, with no response.
::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). , for those curious. ] (]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} ] ] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] and ] reported by ] (Result: Page already protected) ==
<u>Comments:</u> <br />


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br />
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}}
*{{AN3|no}} There is a slow-moving edit war there, but no violation of 3RR exists. Remember that ''at least'' *four* reverts must be done in no more than 24 hours, which is not the case here. However, if you continue, it is likely for any of you to end up blocked. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' ]] 14:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
;Page: {{pagelinks|Abdus Salam‎}}
#
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Woleez}}
#
#
# (second IP)


;Previous version reverted to:


;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|601028970|13:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|601028014|13:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "huge difference between non-muslim and not-muslim, constitution say not-muslim, so read it by your self. then undo my edit. http://www.thepersecution.org/archive/ordxx.html"
# {{diff2|601025757|12:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Dr salam had contributed towards initial project development of atomic project, I known it for sure. so don't try to undo it."


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601028467|13:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (])"


'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page


'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
;<u>Comments:</u>


<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
It is an edit warring report not a 3RR. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a stating {{tq|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. ] | ] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|p}} ] (]) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hours) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==


;Page: {{pagelinks|Pattern Recognition in Physics}} '''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Marc Benioff}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Intuitive2000}}


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|99.98.190.59}}
;Previous version reverted to:


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff|oldid=601018969|diff=601024234|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC) to 12:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|601023278|12:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601018969 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601023733|12:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601014447 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601023819|12:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600996239 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601023868|12:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600996199 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601023936|12:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600996098 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601024047|12:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600987011 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601024147|12:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600986899 by ] (])"
## {{diff2|601024234|12:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 600986661 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|601024993|12:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "TheRedPenOfDoom is abusing and disrupting this entry by deleting entries necessary for understanding the full story:"
# {{diff2|601047501|15:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601046086 by ]: The original content has been restored. There are several attempts of censoring information necessary to understand the full story. Argue your argument instead of deleting"
# {{diff2|601051741|16:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601049755 by ] Dear TheRedPenOfDoom, do not delete just because you do not like the full story. Add contents if you have it"
# {{diff2|601056947|17:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601056121 by ] Do not delete. You are censoring. Argue your arguments in the talk page."
# {{diff2|601058302|17:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601057248 by ] Do not be boring. There is a discussion."


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: '''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
# {{diff2|1265027253|18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1265009969|16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1264902002|03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
#
# {{diff2|1264865734|23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: '''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# {{diff2|601051394|16:23, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* We are not Ouadfeul mouthpiece */ agree" # {{diff2|1265024674|18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
# {{diff2|1265033023|18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
;<u>Comments:</u>
# {{diff2|1265024924|18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
Several editors disagree with this one editor on the article talk page. Editor has now full scale reverted at least five times, after clear warnings on their talk page. ] (]) 17:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==
*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#4682B4">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#99BADD">]</font>)</sup> 19:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Dune: Part Two}}
== ] reported by ] (Result: No violation) ==


'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|ChasePlowman2014}}
'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Carrie (2013 film)}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Arderich}}


'''Previous version reverted to:'''
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->


'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
Previous version reverted to:
# {{diff2|1265161751|12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
# {{diff2|1265079289|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|1265038799|19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|1264974672|12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""


'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
# https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Carrie_(2013_film)&oldid=601063427
# {{diff2|1265079184|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."
#
# {{diff2|1265080757|00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."
#
#


'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
# {{diff2|1265080353|00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:


<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. ] (]) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
<u>Comments:</u> <br />
:{{u|ChasePlowman2014}} is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
*{{AN3|nve}} <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#4682B4">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#99BADD">]</font>)</sup> 19:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
*{{AN3|b|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

**Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the ] explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- ] <small>(] &#124; ])</small> 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->

== ] reported by ] (Result: 24 hours) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|G8}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|210.211.110.236}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|601060729|17:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|601066137|18:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|601068153|18:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|601070336|18:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601061159|17:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "General note: Not adhering to neutral point of view on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|601070292|18:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

IP repeatedly adding POV comments/personal analysis. I notified them about both NPOV and 3RR on their talk page (diffs included). ] (]) 18:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
:IP has continued to perform reverts restoring the inappropriate content after my warning and and notifying them of this report. ] (]) 18:47, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

*{{AN3|b|24 hours}} <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#4682B4">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#99BADD">]</font>)</sup> 19:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: 72 hours) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Template:Syrian civil war detailed map}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Amensnober91}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *2* reverts to violate WP:1RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts (1RR per ]):
#
#
#

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 1RR warning:

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: (i'm not an involved party)

<u>Comments:</u> <br />
] is among several users engaged on an all-out edit-warring on the described article, which is sanctioned for 1RR.] (]) 19:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->

:{{an3|b}} 72 hours, given that he was previosuly blocked this very same month for 48 hours. ]: please keep and eye on it and let me know at my talk page if, after the block expires, he come sback and violates 1RR again. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' ]] 21:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
::{{replyto|Hahc21}} please record the block at ].] (]) 22:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
:::Done. Thanks. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' ]] 22:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: No action taken) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Template:Syrian civil war detailed map}} <br />
'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks|Daki122}}

<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place, and which proves the diffs are reverts by showing material the same or similar to what is being reverted to. -->

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *2* reverts to violate WP:1RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts (1RR per ]):
#
#

<!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary -->
<!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so. -->
Diff of edit warring / 1RR warning: for edit-warring at this same page

<!-- You've tried to resolve this edit war on the article talk page, haven't you? So put a link to the discussion here. If all you've done is reverted-without-talk, you may find yourself facing a block too -->
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: (i'm not an involved party)

<u>Comments:</u> <br />
Among several users engaged on an all-out edit-warring on the described article, which is sanctioned for 1RR.] (]) 19:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
<!-- OPTIONAL: Add any other comments and sign your name using ~~~~ -->

:{{an3|not}}. I'm going to give Daki122 the benefit of the doubt since the edits did occur on different days although they were 21 hours apart, ''and'' because Daki122 wasn't notified of this discussion. That particular edit seems to have gone back and forth quite a bit among other editors as well. I'm minded to fully protect the talk page for a while, although several of the reverts I see in the history are self-reverts.

:I will leave a warning on the user's talk page. ~] <small>(])</small> 21:04, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
::Yeah, my mistake for not notifying him - i had been distracted right in the middle of it.] (]) 22:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
::{{replyto|Amatulic}} please record the warning at ].] (]) 22:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about this I did not see the hours on the reverts as I did revert in two different days so I did not notice that 24 hours did not pass.I did not notice that I eve broke the rule as I thought a day(24 hours) had passed since my last edit.Thanks for the heads up I will try to be more careful next times.] (]) 23:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Winx Club}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|87.161.204.120}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Winx_Club&diff=601098411&oldid=601098263
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Winx_Club&diff=601094709&oldid=601085441

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601095004|21:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|601095700|21:40, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* Threatening users about being blocked */ new section"
# {{diff2|601096874|21:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* March 2014 */"
# {{diff2|601098393|21:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

Continually edit warring with another IP and threatening to block the other IP. This IP has persistently ignored warnings and branded them as me threatening them <span style="background:#FFF; text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue">]]</span> 22:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
*{{an3|b}} for 60 hours. ''<small>→ Call me</small>'' ]] 22:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Bhakta Prahlada (1931 film)}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Marchoctober}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:


;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

When there is strong evidence to prove that '']'' was released in 1932, he mocks it and supports much older sources which erroneously state 1931 (due to an old belief which he still follows). He has been edit warring against multiple experienced editors who support 1932. ] (]) 13:22, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

::Could you please see the talk page here: ], the above user has been trying to edit the article in a biased manner suitable to him, the talk page even had and administrator who concluded that the name change had no consensus and that the same name be continued, now this user reports me as edit warring though I had not indulged in any edit warring as reported by this user, I have provided all the possible sources and also provided an amicable solution of presenting the same information on the article which the above user presented and without deleting the present information which has overwhelming sources unlike this user's version, the talk page has all the information, in order to get his way on the article this user seem to be reporting me as edit warring, but in good faith I will assume, he misunderstood me and reported me as edit warring here. ] (]) 21:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|List of video games notable for negative reception}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|XXX8906}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff|oldid=601178783|diff=601179754|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC) to 11:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}}
## {{diff2|601179518|11:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Reverted to revision 601108918 by ] (]): Seems acceptable to me. (])"
## {{diff2|601179754|11:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601108918 by ] (])Nothing wrong with having a large amount of content."
# {{diff2|601094741|21:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Reverted ] edits by ] (]): ]'s have now been added for the files. (])"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601204674|15:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


;<u>Comments:</u>

He is placing in-depth content, copied from other pages, on a page that has always been written in a summary style. There is no consensus for these changes. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 15:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Total Siyapaa}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|39.32.206.224}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|601208097|15:52, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "See the talk page topic discussion <Box info>"
# {{diff2|601199857|14:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Reverted to last edit by Finexfeather <Even if 8 crore budget figure from 13 sources is being claimed from low quality sources still it is better then 18 crore un cited figure may be typo error of 1)"
# {{diff2|601138780|02:47, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Even if 8 crore budget figure from 12 sources is being claimed from low quality sources still it is better then 18 crore un cited figure"
# {{diff2|601047588|15:57, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Cited 12 sources and Corrected. wt sock?"
# {{diff2|601046567|15:49, 24 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Reason ?"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601208460|15:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# {{diff2|601205486|15:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* Infobox budget figures discussion */ Cmt"

;<u>Comments:</u>

This is likely an IP sock of LanguageXpert, who has been all over this article like a rash with multiple socks. I requested PP yesterday, but it appears there are a backlog over there. ] (]) 15:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Royal Moroccan Army}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Tabrisius}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|601168334|09:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "removing vandalism..."
# {{diff2|601190791|13:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "The Moroccan army has existed continuously since the 11th-century (removing vandalism)"
# {{diff2|601201734|15:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "ok...done.."
# {{diff2|601211203|16:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Vandalism...next time you edit i'll contact a mod. YOU CAN'T"

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:


;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# {{diff2|601197513|14:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* Tabrisius */ new section"

;<u>Comments:</u>

User is in violation of 3RR, refuses to resolve the conflict on talk, and keeps reverting edit which is clearly good faith with the edit summary "vandalism".
The user in question is also threatening me on the talk page quote: "Next time you edit i'll contact somebody to make you respect a bit others work" ] (]) 16:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] and sockpuppets reported by ] (Result: ) ==

'''Page:''' {{pagelinks|Roosh V}} <br />
'''User being reported:'''
* {{userlinks|Elmech}}
'''and sockpuppets;'''
* {{Userlinks|Egirl90}}
* {{Userlinks|Doixir}}

Previous version reverted to:

<!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed. Dates are optional. Remember, you do need *4* reverts to violate WP:3RR, although edit warring has no such strict rule. -->
Diffs of the user's reverts:
# 00:17, 25 March 2014
# 11:06, 25 March 2014
# 13:51, 25 March 2014‎
# 00:18, 26 March 2014‎

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: The user has been invited to the talk page on numerous occasions , but their one and only edit to an article talk page so far has been to delete the discussion they were invited to join and insert a forged comment from another user to make them appear biased.

My report on this user ] has received little attention. This is the first time they have broken the 3RR, but they have been reverting the article to their preferred version at least once every few days for more than a month now. This needs some serious admin attention, as they are holding the article hostage and ignoring all attempts at discussion. – ]\<sup><font color="gray">]</font></sup> 01:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
:Seconding Smyth's report. User is ] and a single purpose account. Requesting strong action. Thought they were a sock but apparently were not blocked for it. ] (]) 02:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

== ] reported by ] (Result: Protected) ==

;Page: {{pagelinks|Ed Manion}}
;User being reported: {{userlinks|Connor2278}}

;Previous version reverted to:

;Diffs of the user's reverts:
# {{diff2|601286976|01:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601286406 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|601284658|01:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 601280773 by ] (])"
# {{diff2|601279452|00:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""
# {{diff2|601278556|00:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} ""

;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
# {{diff2|601281111|00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} "General note: Unconstructive editing on ]. (])"
# {{diff2|601286173|01:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on ]. (])"

;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
# {{diff2|601281383|01:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)}} "/* Copyright problem removed */ seek consensus"

;<u>Comments:</u>
*{{AN3|p}} It seems that per the result of the last report, both users were warned of edit warring. Instead of issuing blocks, I have decided to protect the page instead. I did however block {{user|Arizona3876}} and {{user|Bodiddle1963}}. I have also warned Connor2278 about our policy on multiple accounts. <span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:14px"><b><font color="#4682B4">]</font></b></span> <sup>(<font color="#99BADD">]</font>)</sup> 02:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
::{{nao}} would you consider reverting to the previous version given that I have sought consensus at article's talk page? ] ] 03:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:36, 25 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

    Click here to create a new report

    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357
    358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164
    1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480
    481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336
    337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346
    Other links

    User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

    Page: Giganotosaurus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: PaleoFile (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:Napoleonjosephine2020 reported by User:Kline (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

    Page: Lindy Li (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Zilch.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:

    Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. Kline • talk • contribs 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    @Napoleonjosephine2020
    "This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. Kline • talk • contribs 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. Kline • talk • contribs 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). Here’s the exchange, for those curious. EncycloDeterminate (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C and User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Page already protected)

    Page: Warburg effect (oncology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    4. (second IP)



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

    Comments:
    I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a talk page comment stating I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here., and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. CipherRephic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. Bowler the Carmine | talk 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

    User:99.98.190.59 reported by User:ZimZalaBim (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

    Page: Marc Benioff (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 99.98.190.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265024592 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
    2. 16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264902249 by Augmented Seventh (talk)"
    3. 03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264868382 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
    4. 23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264776552 by Zachomatic (talk)"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Marc Benioff."
    2. 18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"

    Comments:

    User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

    Page: Dune: Part Two (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: ChasePlowman2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""
    4. 12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
    2. 00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"

    Comments:

    User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. Happily888 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

    ChasePlowman2014 is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    • Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
      • Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the Dune: Part Two talk page explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
    Categories: