| Revision as of 19:21, 14 April 2014 editLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,841 edits →Your [] nomination of []: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:46, 20 November 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,175 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:CR4ZE/Archive 3. (BOT) | ||
| (376 intermediate revisions by 60 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{-}} | |||
| == GTA V == | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} | |||
| --] (]) 09:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| Regarding the revert {{diff|Grand Theft Auto V|prev|601033867|here}}, both the ] issues as well as changes to link, e.g. changing <nowiki> ]</nowiki> to <nowiki>]</nowiki>, are done by . Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">] '']''</font> 14:16, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| @]; So having the link as <nowiki>]</nowiki> is okay, and your change was just a Reflinks default? And the same for linking publishers in ]? In regards to citing publishers in the template, ] and I agreed that either every publisher is linked every time in the (publisher=) field or that they are linked in the first instance and never again after that. Rhain went with the former. Is that okay? (We have the article at FAC so small things such as this matter). ] (]) 14:25, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :As for overlinking, if two of those ] sources are a mile apart in the reflist it seems logical that they are both linked. If there are, say, 50 of them, maybe not. However, if you guys found it appropriate, I'm the last person to waste time on it. But Reflink seems to think differently. Yes, it's the default apparently, no action on my part there. As for the links to redirects, the choices Reflink makes is without question also IMO less valuable than links directly to sub sections. In other words: I understand your motivation for reverting. Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">] '']''</font> 14:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| :Regarding redirects, well, it's maybe a situation where Reflink's choice makes sense in some cases, but not in other cases. Have a read of ]. Best, <font face="Eras Bold ITC">] '']''</font> 15:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ::In the instances of sub-section wikilinking in ], they make the most sense as they are. If "melee phase" or "continue point" ever split off into their own article, that would require going through 'What links here' to fix the redundant links from other pages, but there is I'm sure a streamlined way of doing so should that ever happen. ] (]) 04:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 --> | |||
| == '']'' == | |||
| Thanks again for the thorough review. I appreciate your diligence. (And that ''Yeezus'' thread was really interesting... but let's promise not to do that.) See you around <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font> ]</span> 01:35, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Also if you have any extra FAC advice for the article, let me know (I'll watch this page) <span style='font:1.1em"Avenir";padding:1px 3px;border:1px solid #909'><font color="#909">czar</font> ]</span> 02:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::The debate over Yeezus to me brings up the need to have a wider discussion at a WikiProject (]/ ]), resulting in the insertion of a new guideline into the project's MoS. In regards to Threes! being sent to FAC, I think the mid-sentence footnotes would come up in addition to the "universal acclaim" use. The prose would need meticulous tightening. Take the following sentence as an example: "The game had no inclination towards minimalism and the pair felt that they needed game mechanics to make the game appear more difficult and worthy of player attention". A mouthful. There's three uses each of the words "the" and "game", which would make the sentence's prose a little unwieldy to read. Consider things like that, and as it's quite a short article, keep reading it aloud to reword sentences to be as succinct as possible. | |||
| ::Feel free, if you're interested, to move along my GAN for ] or ]. Don't forget we have work to do on ], but like you I'm not rushing to work on that one. ] (]) 04:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
| |doc=yes | |||
| |User=Tezero | |||
| |1=t | |||
| }} 22:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] for things which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
| |doc=yes | |||
| |User=Tezero | |||
| |1=t | |||
| }} 02:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! <!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- {{User-multi | |||
| |doc=yes | |||
| |User=Tezero | |||
| |1=t | |||
| }} 04:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==DYK for Development of Grand Theft Auto V== | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| |type = notice | |||
| |image = ] | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the five-year ''']''' was conducted by a team of over 1,000 people?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Development of Grand Theft Auto V|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Development of Grand Theft Auto V|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], , )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> ] (]) 00:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Talkback == | |||
| {{Talkback|Rhain1999|The Music of Grand Theft Auto V|ts = 06:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| Also, congratulations on the DYK for the Development article! -- ] <sup>(])</sup> 06:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Your ] nomination of ]== | |||
| Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 19:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:46, 20 November 2024
 Archives (Index) |
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)