Revision as of 20:19, 21 September 2004 edit62.172.24.46 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:02, 10 December 2024 edit undoMasterhatch (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers47,233 edits Undid revision 1262259392 by 2409:40E3:19:FD9F:8000:0:0:0 (talk) not sure how that helpsTags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header|noarchive=yes}} | |||
A vandal is a person who deliberately damages property, information etc. Vandalism is the act of damaging the property, information etc. | |||
{{tmbox | |||
| type = content | |||
| image = ] | |||
| style = padding: 6px; | |||
| textstyle = text-align: left; | |||
| text = <div style="font-size: 14pt; text-align: center; line-height: 2em">'''This is <u>NOT</u> the page for reporting vandalism'''.</div> | |||
This page is for discussion of the ''']''' page and its associated official policy. | |||
* Report obvious vandals at ''']'''. | |||
* Report any other incidents at the ''']'''. | |||
* For common cases of vandalism, just ''']''' them. | |||
}} | |||
{{Policy talk}} | |||
{{American English}} | |||
{{Central|Category talk:Misplaced Pages vandalism}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
{{Counter-Vandalism Unit}} | |||
{{WikiProject Help |class=Project |importance=top}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Press | |||
| author = Chris Matyszczyk | |||
| date = 2013-05-02 | |||
| url = http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57582647-71/windows-8-wikipedia-page-vandalized/ | |||
| title = Windows 8 Misplaced Pages page vandalized | |||
| org = ] | |||
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/6GKWDVO4U | |||
| archivedate = 2013-05-02 | |||
| accessdate = 2013-05-02 | |||
}} | |||
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes|bot=lowercase sigmabot II|age=180|index=/Archive index| | |||
<br /><center>See also: ]</center> | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
|counter = 9 | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
|algo = old(180d) | |||
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Vandalism/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
== Vandalism? Promotion? == | |||
IP-addresses including | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
*likely many more in the same range | |||
posted in late February many television series releases (like ) on pages like ] like they are notable events. It don’t seems notable?. But is it also vandalism or promotion? Or should it all be moved to pages like ] ] (]) 13:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
== should be protected == | |||
i did this once... i did it to the main page. | |||
It was stupid becasue I type I FARTED... | |||
the page should be protected ] (]) 23:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
got told off by a message... which is still there... wont go away. | |||
I dont get it though... why make such a thing. because I bet 100 do this every minute... | |||
== I do not think that all humorous writing is vandalism, and this page could acknowledge that. == | |||
Considering that vandalism is done in bad faith, and does not need to be humorous. Vandals can attempt to destroy Misplaced Pages out of hate. | |||
Examples of humorous writing that is in good faith, but still disruptive, is when adding constructive material in an excessively humorous style, or inserting jokes that are meant to improve the fun of reading the article (and therefore helping it), but the jokes are out of place. Misplaced Pages is a serious wiki, after all. Sites like ] are examples of sites with a lot of humorous writing in good faith, to the point where humor is featured in encyclopedic material. | |||
There are templates to warn people who are adding inappropriate humor into pages, and where such writing is not proven to be vandalism (therefore not making those templates be redundant to those for warning about vandalism), and they are ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
How can this be acknowledged? Perhaps by mentioning something like this under "What is not vandalism" so that good-faith editors with too much humor can be seperated from those who want to damage this wiki, even if it can be hard to tell those two apart since humor happens to be common in vandalism. ] (]) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Yes ] (]) 10:41, 28 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
== images of vandalism for examples? == | |||
I propose adding images as examples of vandalism, such as this | |||
] ] (]) 06:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I have to look at too much of this already. I'll quit if any of you make me start looking at it in my free time. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 06:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:No, we don't draw attention to trolls here, see ]. Please find something constructive to do. ] (]) 07:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Feedback requested about homoglyph vandalism == | |||
Hello. A discussion is taking place regarding this tricky form of vandalism. Your feedback would be appreciated at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 20:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:02, 10 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vandalism page. |
|
This is NOT the page for reporting vandalism.
This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Vandalism page and its associated official policy.
|
The project page associated with this talk page is an official policy on Misplaced Pages. Policies have wide acceptance among editors and are considered a standard for all users to follow. Please review policy editing recommendations before making any substantive change to this page. Always remember to keep cool when editing, and don't panic. |
This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, Category talk:Misplaced Pages vandalism redirects here. |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Vandalism? Promotion?
IP-addresses including
posted in late February many television series releases (like ) on pages like 2024 in the Netherlands like they are notable events. It don’t seems notable?. But is it also vandalism or promotion? Or should it all be moved to pages like 2024 in Dutch television 82.174.61.58 (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
should be protected
the page should be protected Truth protest (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I do not think that all humorous writing is vandalism, and this page could acknowledge that.
Considering that vandalism is done in bad faith, and does not need to be humorous. Vandals can attempt to destroy Misplaced Pages out of hate.
Examples of humorous writing that is in good faith, but still disruptive, is when adding constructive material in an excessively humorous style, or inserting jokes that are meant to improve the fun of reading the article (and therefore helping it), but the jokes are out of place. Misplaced Pages is a serious wiki, after all. Sites like TV Tropes are examples of sites with a lot of humorous writing in good faith, to the point where humor is featured in encyclopedic material.
There are templates to warn people who are adding inappropriate humor into pages, and where such writing is not proven to be vandalism (therefore not making those templates be redundant to those for warning about vandalism), and they are here, here, here, here and here.
How can this be acknowledged? Perhaps by mentioning something like this under "What is not vandalism" so that good-faith editors with too much humor can be seperated from those who want to damage this wiki, even if it can be hard to tell those two apart since humor happens to be common in vandalism. CarlFilip19 (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
images of vandalism for examples?
I propose adding images as examples of vandalism, such as this
InsertCoolNameHere78 (talk) 06:45, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have to look at too much of this already. I'll quit if any of you make me start looking at it in my free time. Remsense ‥ 论 06:48, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- No, we don't draw attention to trolls here, see WP:DENY. Please find something constructive to do. Johnuniq (talk) 07:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback requested about homoglyph vandalism
Hello. A discussion is taking place regarding this tricky form of vandalism. Your feedback would be appreciated at WT:AIV#Homoglyph vandalism. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: