Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Frank Samuelsen and George Harbo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:32, 27 June 2006 editNscheffey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,278 edits []: Comment, neutral← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:40, 19 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,670 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (3x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''keep'''. --] 05:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
Comes across as story, should not be in "duo" form. Needs split, deleted, or reworking. 223 google hits, one on google groups. ] 12:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Comes across as story, should not be in "duo" form. Needs split, deleted, or reworking. 223 google hits, one on google groups. ] 12:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' This is a good question. They are both clearly notable (crossing the Atlantic in 55 days in a rowboat), but the "duo" format does seem strange. I guess we have ], although they are most well known by that title. If we split it into two articles it seems like they would be two copies of the same thing though. Remaining '''Neutral''' until I hear other's thoughts. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''' This is a good question. They are both clearly notable (crossing the Atlantic in 55 days in a rowboat), but the "duo" format does seem strange. I guess we have ], although they are most well known by that title. If we split it into two articles it seems like they would be two copies of the same thing though. Remaining '''Neutral''' until I hear other's thoughts. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' but clean up. The redirects from the individuals works for me. Since they did this as a team, the one entry seems proper. --] 14:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I think it should be kept, what they did is notable enough. I don't think it shold be split either - this is the only thing they are notable for, and they did it together. It is more of an article on what they did - which is notable, then on their private lives - which are not so notable. So I think it should be kept in this way (but of course the article does need a clean-up).--] 11:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' they've got sources, and there are plenty of two-person articles (see ]). Article should be tagged for cleanup, though. ] 21:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 18:40, 19 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Ezeu 05:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Frank Samuelsen and George Harbo

Comes across as story, should not be in "duo" form. Needs split, deleted, or reworking. 223 google hits, one on google groups. Burgwerworldz 12:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment This is a good question. They are both clearly notable (crossing the Atlantic in 55 days in a rowboat), but the "duo" format does seem strange. I guess we have Leopold and Loeb, although they are most well known by that title. If we split it into two articles it seems like they would be two copies of the same thing though. Remaining Neutral until I hear other's thoughts. --Nscheffey 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but clean up. The redirects from the individuals works for me. Since they did this as a team, the one entry seems proper. --DarkAudit 14:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I think it should be kept, what they did is notable enough. I don't think it shold be split either - this is the only thing they are notable for, and they did it together. It is more of an article on what they did - which is notable, then on their private lives - which are not so notable. So I think it should be kept in this way (but of course the article does need a clean-up).--Konstable 11:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep they've got sources, and there are plenty of two-person articles (see Category:Multiple people). Article should be tagged for cleanup, though. Ziggurat 21:58, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.