Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Oh my actual god: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:31, 27 June 2006 editTimtrent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers131,324 edits →[]: del← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:29, 19 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,667,804 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (6x)Tag: Fixed lint errors 
(15 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was '''delete'''. --] 06:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
I get about for this protologism, far short of sufficient to establish notability ] 15:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC) I get about for this protologism, far short of sufficient to establish notability ] 15:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


*'''Delete'''. Not a notable phrase; also offensive.--] 15:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Not a notable phrase; also offensive.--] 15:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
::'''Comment.''' How could the fact that it's offensive be in ANY way relevant to this discussion? Misplaced Pages is not censored. If you don't like that fact, stop editing. NOW. ] 16:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

:::Misplaced Pages is a collective enterprise which determines, by consensus, both what is notable and what is appropriate. If you don't think there is censorship in Misplaced Pages already then you should try posting anything on a conservative topic. Misplaced Pages is and will be censored. ] 19:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
94 actually, why not have it on wiki, I know more than 100 people who say it frequently, you probably know none.{{unsigned|Shaunhodge}}
94 actually, why not have it on wiki, I know more than 100 people who say it frequently, you probably know none.<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:'''Comment''': ] ] 17:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' protologism, sources need to be verifiable, "I know people who say it" is not verifiable. ] 15:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC) * '''Delete''' protologism, sources need to be verifiable, "I know people who say it" is not verifiable. ] 15:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Delete''' this doesn't belong in wikipedia. I know lots of people who say ], ] and ] but none of these merit an article. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 15:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong Delete''' this doesn't belong in wikipedia. I know lots of people who say ], ] and ] but none of these merit an article. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 15:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Then maybe we can hear someone say it. ] 15:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Then maybe we can hear someone say it. ] 15:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ]. Funny, but I've never heard anyone use it. --] 16:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This saying raises troubling theological questions that could get Misplaced Pages into (even more) trouble with the Almighty. ] 19:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Unless this has been written up in some reliable source outside Misplaced Pages, this isn't encyclopedic. --] 19:48, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Very, very, very, very stupid. ] 20:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Good Lord! Delete''', nonsense, fails ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 21:49, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''' Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. ]<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 01:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong actual delete''' per above. ] 04:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per all. "This phrase is not slang for anything". So...um... it's just words then? --] 08:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Actually really in fact delete''' - blasphemy is neither here nor there. There's no entry for the vast majority of common phrases in English, nor should there be. This clumsy neologism doesn't deserve one either. ] 12:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 20:29, 19 March 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 06:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh my actual god

I get about 93 hits on Google for this protologism, far short of sufficient to establish notability Daniel Case 15:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment. How could the fact that it's offensive be in ANY way relevant to this discussion? Misplaced Pages is not censored. If you don't like that fact, stop editing. NOW. 205.188.116.138 16:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages is a collective enterprise which determines, by consensus, both what is notable and what is appropriate. If you don't think there is censorship in Misplaced Pages already then you should try posting anything on a conservative topic. Misplaced Pages is and will be censored. george 19:34, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

94 actually, why not have it on wiki, I know more than 100 people who say it frequently, you probably know none.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaunhodge (talk • contribs)

Comment: (insert snow owl here) hateless 17:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.