| Revision as of 08:21, 14 May 2014 editSnow Rise (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,493 editsm →You've failed to even mention how it started as a ninja game← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:00, 1 December 2024 edit undoSadko (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers81,625 edits OneClickArchived "External links modified (February 2018)" to Talk:Dishonored/Archive 1 |
| (40 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
|action1result=keep |
|
|action1result=keep |
|
|action1oldid=440518760 |
|
|action1oldid=440518760 |
|
|
|maindate= 11 January 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=GAN |
|
|action2=GAN |
| Line 19: |
Line 20: |
|
|action3oldid=602083481 |
|
|action3oldid=602083481 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=FA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Video games|class=FA|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
{{refideas |
|
{{refideas |
|
|1={{cite web |url=http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/religions/article/view/12163 |title=‘The Lamb of Comstock’. Dystopia and Religion in Video Games}} |
|
|1={{cite web |url=http://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/religions/article/view/12163 |title=‘The Lamb of Comstock’. Dystopia and Religion in Video Games}} |
|
|
|2= |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{archives}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Issues with edits == |
|
==Website== |
|
|
There is an official website up, www.dishonored.com] (]) 03:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Dishonored box art Bethesda.jpg== |
|
|
] |
|
|
Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. |
|
|
|
|
|
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair --> "n.a." is not a valid fair use rationale. ] (]) 21:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Harvey Smith's work on Thief? == |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't actually think Harvey Smith did much for Thief: Deadly Shadows and in fact it is probably more like people confuse him with the Project Director, Randy Smith. Harvey Smith that "Periodically, someone credits me with Thief, which I love, but did not work on. (I’m mentioned in special thanks for Thief 3, probably.)" , and the most I could find a reference for was in under "Additional Design". |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 05:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Josh Holloway is not in this game. == |
|
|
|
|
|
To prevent further bizarre additions of this, read . |
|
|
|
|
|
""Corvo is entirely silent," Smith said. "We let you project onto him, for better or worse." ] (]) 03:01, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Gameplay image or video == |
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have any suggestions for a good image or video that could visualise the gameplay? A video is fine, I can edit it if necessary. ] (]) 14:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Pointless entry until release == |
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever any dev may have said about any feature the game may have - it all may change until release day. The whole entry is pretty pointless until the game is actually released, IMHO.] (]) 19:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:It comes out in a month and all previews back up what is in it, nothing has changed. So your comment is pretty unnecessary IMHO. ] (]) 19:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Corvo Attano == |
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see this ingame poster you're talking about, but to prevent any further confusion I just asked Harvey Smith and he says Attano . ] (]) 19:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Smith and Colantonio stated... unreferenced tag == |
|
|
|
|
|
I added the tag to "Smith and Colantonio stated that it is impossible for a player to accrue all of the powers and abilities in a single playthrough." because I didn't see a cite immediately after it, and I think generally for a direct attribution, which this basically is even though it doesn't quote, adding a cite is encouraged, or even required. If it's in one of the other sources used in the article, could that ref tag be copied to the end of that sentence, for clarity? —<B>]</B> <sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-3ex;">]</sub> 19:29, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:It was the next immediate source, but I repeated it. ] (]) 20:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== "Dishonored" redirect == |
|
|
|
|
|
Right now the page {{no redirect|Dishonored}} is a redirect to ]. Now I doubt many people would type in the word "dishonored" looking for that page. "Dishonor", definitely, but I'm sure at least 99% of people who type in "dishonored" are looking for this game. What does everyone think? Should I change the redirect or not? If nobody posts anything here I'll ] and change the redirect; if that's not what the community wants it can always be changed back. |
|
|
'''<span style="color: #060;">flarn</span><span style="color: #090;">2006</span>''' ] ] ]''] time: 07:20, 20 October 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Agreed. It doesn't seem to be a reasonable redirect on its own (neither ], ] or ] exist) and you'd imagine most people would be looking for either this article or ]. I've gone ahead and CSD'd ] to make way for the move. ''']'''<sup>''']'''•''']'''</sup> 19:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Instead of changing the redirect, why not moving the article to that title? — ]] 19:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Oh, I assumed that was what was being suggested. Otherwise there'd be no need to delete the current redirect. ''']'''<sup>''']'''•''']'''</sup> 20:46, 2 December 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Talk:Dishonored/GA1}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Copy Edit Progress == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have removed all of the redundant reference tags (seriously? Three consecutive identical references in 3 sentences?) and will be checking grammar, spelling and overall language. :) ] (]) 11:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:I disagree on a lot of the reference tags, if the exact same reference is repeated one after another without interruption that's a side effect of expanding the article, but in some cases you've removed references entirely from a section meaning points are now longer properly referenced. In other cases they might appear later in the same section but they're after multiple other references, so the original point is now not referenced as far as someone checking the first immediate reference is concerned and they realistically shouldn't be checking every ref in a paragraph to find the one relating to the point. Where multiple references are used one after another for a single point, it is because the point is not entirely covered in the single source. ] (]) 16:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::I understand that, but the fact is that several of these paragraphs were littered with references, making them extremely hard to read. I may have been overzealous left and right, but I stand by the majority of these removals. As with most triple A-titles these days, there consist a plethora of online reference materials, which results in a short sentence being followed by three or more references... ] (]) 10:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I understand removing repeat references in consecutive sentences, I'm just saying that when your CE is done I will have to restore some of them because there are some unsourced statements now. ] (]) 02:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Ping|Darkwarriorblake|SomeoneElseMightGetItWrong}} |
|
== You've failed to even mention how it started as a ninja game == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please discuss the issue here instead of the edit summary of the article. This way other editors can weigh in on the situation and provide their thoughts and guidance. Thank You. '''''<span style="background:#4169E1;padding:2px; border-radius:7px"><span class="nowrap">]]</span></span>''''' 23:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
--] (]) 17:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:The issue appears to be resolved. My intention was not to edit war, I am somewhat still inexperienced here and did not know how else to begin a discussion. In either case, I still believe the plot can be trimmed in certain parts - for instance, the summary as is mentions details that the player can only learn by taking certain routes, such as learning that Burrows (the Lord Regent) started the plague himself. That's only learned if you take the non-lethal route on his level. In any case, for now I will focus on other articles. ] (]) 15:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
:You've failed to mention a source for this claim. ] ] 08:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:For the record {{u|Alucard 16}} I think the edit warring warning was a bit premature and excessive, there were 3 edits total over a lengthy period of time. And {{u|SomeoneElseMightGetItWrong}}, it does contain info that can't be obtained through every route but the aim is to create a comprehensive story. It seems pointless to leave out details just because someone might not learn that on their playthrough. ] / ] 17:19, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
::While we're at it, I also disliked getting a warning such as that one after already settling the situation peacefully... especially considering that there was no bad faith on either part till then. Also, I understand your reasoning {{u|Darkwarriorblake}}, and will not make any edit regarding that then. If you wish to return Granny Rags to the summary, go ahead. Any edit I make from now on will focus only on readability ] (]) 18:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{U|Alucard 16}}, FYI this might be coming across like you've done something wrong, I think it was unnecessary to warn us but I can see you were trying to help and force a dialog. Thanks. ] / ] 18:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC) |
Please discuss the issue here instead of the edit summary of the article. This way other editors can weigh in on the situation and provide their thoughts and guidance. Thank You. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 23:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
