| Revision as of 14:22, 23 May 2014 editKoala15 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users132,298 edits →Undo deletion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:34, 23 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,290,674 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:JBW/Archive 84) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <big><big>Please post new sections at the ''bottom'' of the page. If you don't, there is a risk that your message may never be noticed, if other edits follow it before I get here.</big></big> | |||
| {{Clear}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = |
|maxarchivesize = 300K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 84 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 0 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(10d) | ||
| |archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:JBW/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| <!--TABLE MUST START ON NEXT LINE START, ELSE SANDBOX BUG--> | |||
| {| CLASS="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{lc: }}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{lc:attn }}|none|<!--NONE--> | |||
| | {{!}}{{!}} [[Image:{{#switch:{{lc:attn }} | |||
| | blank = No image.svg | |||
| | plus = B plus.svg | |||
| | lang = Nuvola apps edu languages.svg | |||
| | info = Info talk.png | |||
| | attn = Emblem-important.svg | |||
| | stop = Stop hand nuvola.svg | |||
| | frag = Merge-split-transwiki default.svg | |||
| | #default = attn | |||
| }}|{{#ifeq:{{lc: }}|yes|30px|50px}}|User talk]] | |||
| }} | |||
| |<!--NEW CELL--> | |||
| * '''If I left you a message on your talk page:''' please answer on your talk page, and drop me a brief note here to let me know you have done so. (<nowiki>You may do this by posting {{Talkback|your username}} on this page, or by writing your own note.</nowiki>) (I make only limited use of watchlisting, because I have found otherwise I am unable to keep it under control, and soon build up such a huge watchlist that it is unworkable.) | |||
| * '''If you leave me a message here:''' I will answer here, unless you request otherwise, or I think there are particular reasons to do otherwise, and usually I will notify you on your talk page. | |||
| *Please add new sections to the '''bottom''' of this page, and new messages to the '''bottoms''' of their sections. New messages at the top of the page may be overlooked. | |||
| :{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{hidenew}}} }}|yes||{{#ifeq:{{lc:{{{runon}}} }}|yes||}}<SPAN CLASS="plainlinks">''''''</SPAN>}} | |||
| : | |||
| *After a section has not been edited for a week it is automatically moved to the latest archive. Links to those archives are given below. However, I reserve the right to delete vandalism, trolling or other unconstructive edits without archiving them. | |||
| |} | |||
| {{archive box | auto=yes }} | {{archive box | auto=yes }} | ||
| == Robert Castillo Notable School of Visual Arts Alumni == | |||
| I have some links that Robert Castillo is a Notable SVA Computer Arts Alumni below. | |||
| :http://mfaca.sva.edu/node/415/default.htm | |||
| And also a Storyboard Artist on Feature Films. | |||
| :http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1453591/ | |||
| please let me know if you need more information. | |||
| hope i did this right first time on here. | |||
| (] (]) 01:10, 16 May 2014 (UTC)) | |||
| Evidently you have come to me in the belief that I deleted your article. In fact, what I deleted was another article, about a completely different person called "Robert Castillo". Nevertheless, in the hope of helping you, I have had a look at the history of your article, and the following is what I concluded. | |||
| Unfortunately, it looks to me as though, like many people, you have probably come to Misplaced Pages in good faith, thinking that it would be a perfect place to have a page to tell the world about yourself, but without realising that for several reasons what you have in mind does not conform to Misplaced Pages standards. My advice is that you would be better off posting your page about yourself either on a social networking site or on a web hosting service: Misplaced Pages is neither of those. In the hope of helping you understand why I say that, I will list some of the issues involved. | |||
| #"... '''is''' a Notable ..."? Do you mean "... '''am''' a Notable ..."? If not, then your username is deceptive, and you need to change it. | |||
| #Neither of the links you provide goes anywhere towards showing that you/he satisfy/satisfies Misplaced Pages's ]. A glowingly promotional IMDb page does nothing whatever to show notability, as anyone with the remotest connection to the film industry can write themselves one of those. Nor does a page on a college's web site listing the career history of one of its student establish notability. | |||
| #You should not be writing an article about yourself. Misplaced Pages articles should be written by neutral, third party, editors. | |||
| #Prompted by this message, I looked at your editing history, and was led to your user page. It seems that it was originally created as an article, and moved to your user space because it was grossly unsuitable as an article. In fact, the editor who moved it was being remarkably generous, as it is equally unsuitable as a user page. The first thing that struck me was that it was clearly a piece of pure promotion. Misplaced Pages is not a medium for promotion, and any promotional page may be speedily deleted without notice. The second thing that struck me was that it is nothing whatever about work on the encyclopaedia, as a user page should be, and appears to constitute use of the Misplaced Pages servers as a free web host to hold a personal web page. That too, on its own, is sufficient grounds for speedy deletion. Looking further, I found that the page is a verbatim copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1453591/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bth_nm meaning that there is copyright infringement, which again would on its own be sufficient grounds for speedy deletion. With three separate reasons, any one of which would be grounds for speedy deletion, I'm afraid the page really must be deleted. | |||
| #The article that you created was deleted because it was a copyright infringement of a page at www.indiepixfilms.com. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 07:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Non-block == | |||
| {{talkback|Gogo Dodo|Non-block}} | |||
| :Seen. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 07:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == APPA == | |||
| This is a new team in a national U-20 soccer league with the majority here on Wiki with articles. | |||
| How is that not relevant? I want to create this page, but not get deleted again. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :After some searching, I concluded that this must refer to deletion of the article ]. It was apparently about a local, largely amateur, youth sports team, with no indication whatever that it is any more significant than most such teams. If there are articles about other teams in the same league then they should probably be deleted too. However, a quick search failed to turn up any articles devoted to such teams, though I did find mentions of such teams in articles about professional clubs that also have junior teams. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 07:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==QxOrm== | |||
| {{Talkback|Bozo614}} | |||
| :Seen. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 07:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Thank you for finally resolving Wondering55. I hope they learn to work well with others, after a WP:GAB-compliant request. ]<sup>]]</sup> 11:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{Talkback|Bozo614}} | |||
| Hi | |||
| Thanks for your advice earlier with the page on sertoli cell tumors. Appreciated. | |||
| Cheers | |||
| ] (]) 19:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == List of Teen Titans Go! episodes == | |||
| Hello JamesBWatson. You recently deleted the page ] as unambiguous copyright infringement. ] just alerted me to the fact that it's been recreated, with much of the same content (including the infringing material), only this time split across three articles: ], ], and ]. The only substantial contributors to these new articles are the new users ] and ]. This seems rather suspicious. For one thing, the similarity in user names leads me to supect that the two accounts are operated by the same individual. For another, the fact that they reposted much of the exact text of the deleted page leads me to suspect that this person is the same person who contributed it to the original incarnation of ]. (It may be one of the users who was persistently removing the copyvio template from the original article, and/or even ], whose ] was the reason the page was discovered to be a copyvio.) However, as I'm not an administrator I don't have access to the deleted page history to see if it supports these suspicions. Perhaps you could have a look? If not, do you think this would be worth filing an ] for someone else to investigate? In the meantime I've blanked the pages with the {{tl|copyvio}} template, and will let ] know about this post, since they opened the CCI. —] (]) 21:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Summichum == | |||
| Concerning your recent actions, you should inform on this ]. Thanks ] (]) 11:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :About the ], I am impressed that you could identify the copyright infringement. I had added a specific warning to the User's talk page, concerning such violation. Knowing that it is very serious concern. ] (]) 12:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| re. {{user|John Johnstone Smith}}. I was about to start an RFC/U. ] (]) 18:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Userfication == | |||
| Hello. I am requesting userfication of "Exchange 2.0" to my userspace for potential improvement. I have found additional sources and references for it which appeared as the program developed over the months, since its deletion in November 2013, such as and , among others. Thank you. --] (]) 15:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :The article was nothing but an advertisement, which has no place whatever on Misplaced Pages. In the unlikely event that there exists evidence that the subject satisfies Misplaced Pages's notability criteria, perhaps someone can write a good, balanced, non-promotional article about it, but that article will have nothing in common with the blatant spam that you posted, and restoring the deleted content would do nothing whatever to benefit the encyclopaedia. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 07:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == pls. protect my page == | |||
| == Disruptive Pakistani IP apparently hopped ranges == | |||
| Hi, i'm a new user here and i don't want my user page to be vandalized. Being a admin, you have been given the right to protect pages. can you please protect my user page so only registered users can edit my page? | |||
| have a nice day! | |||
| ] (]) 09:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :No. Your user page will likely not be vandalized. Even if it is, there's an undo button. ]<sup>]]</sup> 03:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hey now, that is a little unfair regarding a reasonable request. Per ] it is permitted to protect user pages by request of that user. ] (]) 03:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, and I semi-protected the page when TheDyslexicWikipedian asked me to. Ver likely to be unnecessary, but it does no harm at all, so why not, if the editor wants it? <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 06:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| is exhibiting the same behavior. –] (]) 16:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Acknowledgement of response to help request== | |||
| : {{ping|Skywatcher68}} This is one of those really kind and helpful block-evading editors, who do their best to make what they are doing as blindingly obvious as they can, by various clever little tricks such as making every one of their edits on pages previously edited by the blocked editor (apart from one talk page edit back in July). If I were evading a block I don't think I would do that. ] (]) 21:09, 14 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : d57, d'oh ;) --] (]) 09:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Expired rangeblock needs renewal == | |||
| == Undo deletion == | |||
| Our uncommunicative friend at ] has begun his disruption again after a year-long block expired. ] (]) 01:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Thanks for letting me know, {{u|Binksternet}}. I've blocked again for three years. I've also included in the block rationale a link to a talk page where I've posted a fairly long message about the background to the block. As you no doubt know, it can be very difficult to be sure that an editor using IPv6 addresses sees talk page messages, and while it's certain that this editor has seen at least the block rationales, it is possible that they have seen few, or even none, of the talk page messages. | |||
| : I've already thanked you for alerting me to this, and told you that I have acted on what you said. Nevertheless, I should like to mention that I don't like the way that you posted a series of templated warning messages at escalating levels on the latest talk page, without any further edits between those messages. I don't know what your reason for doing that was, but it doesn't seem constructive. I also don't see it as at all necessary; for an editor with such an extensive history of warnings and blocks it seems pointless to do anything less than tell them right away that they are likely to be blocked again immediately. (In that case it's a good idea to briefly mention the history of range blocks, not for the benefit of the problematic editor, but for the benefit of any administrator reviewing the case. I don't know how many times I've seen a perfectly good report at AIV declined by an administrator who checked only the history of the single IPv6 address reported, not the range.) ] (]) 12:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the action and the advice. ] (]) 15:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 23 December 2024
Please post new sections at the bottom of the page. If you don't, there is a risk that your message may never be noticed, if other edits follow it before I get here.
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Disruptive Pakistani IP apparently hopped ranges
175.107.216.70 is exhibiting the same behavior. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Skywatcher68: This is one of those really kind and helpful block-evading editors, who do their best to make what they are doing as blindingly obvious as they can, by various clever little tricks such as making every one of their edits on pages previously edited by the blocked editor (apart from one talk page edit back in July). If I were evading a block I don't think I would do that. JBW (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Expired rangeblock needs renewal
Our uncommunicative friend at Special:Contributions/2600:8801:7180:7B00:0:0:0:0/64 has begun his disruption again after a year-long block expired. Binksternet (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, Binksternet. I've blocked again for three years. I've also included in the block rationale a link to a talk page where I've posted a fairly long message about the background to the block. As you no doubt know, it can be very difficult to be sure that an editor using IPv6 addresses sees talk page messages, and while it's certain that this editor has seen at least the block rationales, it is possible that they have seen few, or even none, of the talk page messages.
- I've already thanked you for alerting me to this, and told you that I have acted on what you said. Nevertheless, I should like to mention that I don't like the way that you posted a series of templated warning messages at escalating levels on the latest talk page, without any further edits between those messages. I don't know what your reason for doing that was, but it doesn't seem constructive. I also don't see it as at all necessary; for an editor with such an extensive history of warnings and blocks it seems pointless to do anything less than tell them right away that they are likely to be blocked again immediately. (In that case it's a good idea to briefly mention the history of range blocks, not for the benefit of the problematic editor, but for the benefit of any administrator reviewing the case. I don't know how many times I've seen a perfectly good report at AIV declined by an administrator who checked only the history of the single IPv6 address reported, not the range.) JBW (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the action and the advice. Binksternet (talk) 15:33, 20 December 2024 (UTC)