Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/General Tojo: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:32, 29 June 2006 editThatcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,287 edits →General Tojo: moved comment, removed boldface← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:40, 3 April 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(94 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!--
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on ] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
===Persistant usertalk vandal===
* {{checkuser|11111111111111Z}}
* {{checkuser|Yyyyyyyyyykl}}
* {{checkuser|Grunhuldam}}
* {{checkuser|Olly sunsky}}
* {{checkuser|CHRIS 73 THE PAEDOPHILE}}
* {{checkuser|Judge Horner}}
* {{checkuser|CHRIS 73 : TIME WASTER}}
* {{checkuser|CHRIS 73 - OBSESSIVE PERVERT}}
* {{checkuser|Dr Spokky}}
* etc...

Some users are endlessly defacing ]. Since the attacks are always separated by at least a day, this is very probably the same IP again and again. Can you check that and block that IP for a long time if that's possible? Thanks! (I'd be very happy to file an abuse report :)) -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
:PS: some users are tagged as being Tojo, but I'm not that sure (hence me not listing it there). -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

:: It's Tojo all right, and there are quite a few sockies under there. Can we possibly merge this case with General Tojo's cu history? I'll keep working the case here - ] <sup>]</sup> 18:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
::: {{IPblock}} - the main IPs, as well as a few other socks - ] <sup>]</sup> 22:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

=== ] ===

{{rfcu box|case=General Tojo|filed=14:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|General Tojo}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
<!-- Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line. The above line will list an account matching the pagename. -->
* {{checkuser|Uuuuuuuu 99}}
* {{checkuser|609872542 b}}
* {{checkuser|KK 91378}}
* {{checkuser|Jules Verrne}}
* '''Code letter:''' F
* '''Supporting evidence:''' .

This user has been blocked indef, but multiple sockpuppets have been attacking ]. They are adding sections exactly the same as other confirmed socks have done.

] <small>has a boring sig</small>

{{clerknote}} All of these accounts are now indef blocked. I just blocked ] for personal attacks. -]<sub>]</sub> 17:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

:{{confirmed}} - {{User|General Tojo}} = {{User|Foe Toe}}, {{User|E Hyreet}}, {{User|Enemy Forever}}, {{User|Maj Tahal}}, {{User|Uuuuuuuuuu 99}}, {{User|Uuuuuuuu 99}}, {{User|Uuuuuuu 99}}, {{User|Veneere}}, {{User|609872542 b}}, {{User|Logon 789}}, {{User|Dr Von Reiksburg}}, {{User|Lin Wun Du}}, {{User|KK 91378}}, {{User|Lplplplplp}}, {{User|XXX100}}, {{User|XXX101}}, {{User|Jules Verrne}}, {{User|Kapibarra 1}} - some of these are not yet blocked

:{{IPblock}} - ] <sup>]</sup> 18:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
::{{clerknote}}, the remainder of the confirmed accounts have been blocked, and all user pages tagged with the appropriate template and link to evidence. ] 20:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


More:
* {{checkuser|Boriz Yeltzin}}
* {{checkuser|RV 987867}}
* {{checkuser|Yaz 911}}
* {{checkuser|Toyota 897654}}
* {{checkuser|Jules Verrne}}
* {{checkuser|ZX786}}
* {{checkuser|897645rtere}}
* {{checkuser|GGGGGGGG14}}

Looks like they're finding a way around whatever IP block(s) were in place. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 12:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

:{{confirmed}}, needless to say. Unfortunately, this editor is using three /17 ranges of a popular ISP and applying a rangeblock in any way will cause a ''lot'' of collateral damage - ] <sup>]</sup> 13:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
::Ah, tricky. Thanks for looking. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 23:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

===General Tojo 3===
{{rfcu box|case=General Tojo|filed=20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)}}
* {{checkuser|David Wittgenstein}}
* See ] and previous requests
* '''Code letter:''' F

Behaviour highly typical for a Tojo sock on ]. More information on the LTA page and in previous requests. {{User|General Tojo}} is under a community ban for POV pushing, personal attacks and heavy sockpuppeteering on the Parkinson's page. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

{{confirmed}}. ]·] 09:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

=== General Tojo ===
{{rfcu box|case=General Tojo|filed=22:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)}}
<!-- END LINKBOX - DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE -->
<!-- Do not edit above this line. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Lova Falk}}
* {{checkuser|XX7}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

Possibility of these two user to be sockpuppets for the community banned vandal and mass sockpuppeteer General Tojo, (]), suspicion based on edit history, also XX7 is used by Tojo on Meta. ] | ] 22:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
:{{clerknote}} Histmerged from ]. &ndash; <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 22:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
::Retract my request, was hanging around too long, currently not an issue. May reactivate this request if problems flare up again -- ] | ] 23:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>

<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>

=== General Tojo 2 ===
* {{checkuser|General Tojo 2}}
<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Gerard Doyle}}
* {{checkuser|DanJames}}
* {{checkuser|RJ68}}
* '''Code letter:''' F

] provides most details on this sad saga where one user mobilised 100s of sockpuppets to war with an increasing number of users, including several admins, with regards to ]. Tojo (a presumed alias of Keith Bridgeman) was blocked by community ban, and the ArbComm had to intervene to maximise the block. Now, a user has appeared that edited little during the PD wars but engaged in edits that were typical of Tojo (see ]) but somehow managed to escape the blocks. This same user now pushes non-standard views on the Parkinson's page and makes accusations rather similar to Tojo's past defenses on his talkpage. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 20:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

:More info:
:* (adding URL to Tojo site), (reinserting link after being reverted, and this during a Tojo sockpuppet spree).
:* (adding very unusual cause), (and adding it again despite being reverted), etc etc etc. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 20:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

::{{moreinfo}} Code letter and links/diffs as appropriate. ] Co., ] 19:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

:::More info added. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 20:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

{{takenote}} Someone who has older checkuser data on Tojo on file is going to have to handle this. ] Co., ] 18:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

:The deleted August 7 edits at ] were made by Tojo socks and ] is a likely Tojo sock on meta if anyone has cross project Checkuser access. -- <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 19:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

::''Comment'': Uninvited, you may have some of the earlier data on file yourself, per the second request ]. ] 02:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

:::I think Fred Bauder would be best suited to check this one, since he has complied an extensive page about GT socks ]. 01:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

:RJ68 is definitely Tojo coming in from Emirates Telecommunications Corporation. I believe he lives in England, but somehow can use Emirates Telecommunications Corporation in Dubai. I hesitate to block this provider as some of the few Arabs who edit here use that provider. Emailing Emirates Telecommunications Corporation gets no response. ] 02:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
::Checkuser is not really necessary to identify Tojo. He has a very limited repertoire of tendentious editing of Parkinson's disease and related articles and insertion of scurrilous information into articles about black athletes and entertainers. ] 02:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

:Fred, our main concern is {{User|Gerard Doyle}}. Could you check his origin (UK or Emirates?). ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 18:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>



<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>

=== General Tojo2 ===
* {{checkuser|General Tojo_2}}
<!-- Do not edit the top two lines. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|General Tojo}}

A slightly non standard request. I'm trying to send a complaint to an ISP I'm probably going to need Ips but I will need the foundations permission for that. In the mean time I don't want the IP to be lost by falling out of the logs. So I would like the Ips to be extracted and and a record kept. Idealy a copy would be forwarded to Brad Patrick. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

The dif I need IPs recorded from are:

*{{Checkuser|Dan Strickland : ComfortWoman}} http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Profsnow&oldid=63819012
*{{Checkuser|DS and his Comfort Woman}} http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Profsnow&oldid=67282593
*{{Checkuser|DiamondPlus}} http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3APaulWicks&diff=63621213&oldid=63620247
*{{checkuser|Ding dong bing}} http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AProfsnow&diff=63945014&oldid=63848041
*{{checkuser|Dan Strickland and his Comfort Woman}} http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Profsnow&diff=prev&oldid=65448356

* '''Logged.''' I will await an email from Brad before releasing the log. ] Co., ] 20:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>

<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it'''</span>.''</div>

=== General Tojo === === General Tojo ===
* {{checkuser|General Tojo}} * {{checkuser|General Tojo}}
Line 9: Line 169:
* {{checkip|88.106.187.125}} * {{checkip|88.106.187.125}}
* {{checkip|88.106.150.206}} * {{checkip|88.106.150.206}}
* {{checkip|88.106.216.81}} (added by ]) * {{checkip|88.106.216.81}} (added by ])
* {{checkip|88.106.217.11}} (added by ]) * {{checkip|88.106.217.11}} (added by ])
* {{checkip|88.106.218.241}} (added by ]) * {{checkip|88.106.218.241}} (added by ])
Line 18: Line 178:
:I've blocked Hirohito indefinitely for incendiary username, and Parkinsons for 48h for sockpuppeting using the Hirohito account. Their style (and choice of subject) is identical. A range block may become necessary if the disruption does not cease. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 15:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC) :I've blocked Hirohito indefinitely for incendiary username, and Parkinsons for 48h for sockpuppeting using the Hirohito account. Their style (and choice of subject) is identical. A range block may become necessary if the disruption does not cease. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 15:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


That's a deliberately false statement. General Tojo was blocked for the username. It was claimed to be not allowed, and so resulted in a blocking without complying with Wii requirements first. What you describe as warring and disruption was making improvements to the PD site. You specifically thanked me for making them !!! However, you obviousy have double standards. When you or somebody you agree with makes changes no matter how stupied you allow them. When I do exactly the same you desribe it as vandalaism or warring. You have obvious double standards depending on what suits your personal interest and prejudices. General Tojo. {{unsigned|88.106.216.81}} That's a deliberately false statement. General Tojo was blocked for the username. It was claimed to be not allowed, and so resulted in a blocking without complying with Wii requirements first. What you describe as warring and disruption was making improvements to the PD site. You specifically thanked me for making them !!! However, you obviousy have double standards. When you or somebody you agree with makes changes no matter how stupied you allow them. When I do exactly the same you desribe it as vandalaism or warring. You have obvious double standards depending on what suits your personal interest and prejudices. General Tojo. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:That user's only edits are in violating ] on two pages. I took the liberty of adding that address to your list of IP addresses since he claims to be Tojo. All of the contributions follow exactly the same style of writing, commenting, editwarring, 3RR violations, Personal Attacks, Bold Prefacing, massive editing, etc, along with claiming to be Tojo himself on talk pages without signing his name with tildes. Sincerely, ] 19:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC) :That user's only edits are in violating ] on two pages. I took the liberty of adding that address to your list of IP addresses since he claims to be Tojo. All of the contributions follow exactly the same style of writing, commenting, editwarring, 3RR violations, Personal Attacks, Bold Prefacing, massive editing, etc, along with claiming to be Tojo himself on talk pages without signing his name with tildes. Sincerely, ] 19:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
*:{{clerknote}} Excessive strong/bold text de-bolded. General Tojo was indeed indef blocked for "''disruption''". ] 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC) *:{{clerknote}} Excessive strong/bold text de-bolded. General Tojo was indeed indef blocked for "''disruption''". ] 23:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)




**There is a new page on Tojo: Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of General Tojo. Not sure if these sockpuppets need to be checked or not since they are so obvious. ] 15:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC) **There is a new page on Tojo: Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of General Tojo. Not sure if these sockpuppets need to be checked or not since they are so obvious. ] 15:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


{{Confirmed}} ] ] 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC) {{Confirmed}} ] ] 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


'''Additional requests'''
*DOUBLE STANDARDS

*Isn't it strange that some people describe any alterations or reverts they make, no matter how counterproductive, as improvements. If somebody does exactly the same to what they have written they describe it as vandalism, warring and disruption. Intolerant and deludued people ! What puzzles me is this word banned. As I add to Misplaced Pages more than a dozen times a day in various names and with various IP addresses does that really constitute a ban ??? I only use the General Tojo guise when I want to make it very obvious how completely powerless the intolerants on this site are. And no, Kevin (fail to get your facts right) Breitenstein it was because I used (at random) a Japanese pseudonym. I questioned the decision which unable tp provide answers they then described as disruption. General Tojo {{unsigned|88.106.213.233}}
Could you also investigate:

* {{checkuser|Zamalek}}
* {{checkuser|Atterton}}
* {{checkuser|Brockwell}}
* {{checkuser|Viartis}}
* {{checkuser|Dr June}}
* {{checkuser|Hytfr}}

{{Confirmed}} these as well. ] ] 13:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

'''Further additional requests'''

Additionally...
* {{checkuser|Sammy 77}}
* {{checkuser|Oxford Don}}
* {{checkuser|Japanese historian}}
* {{checkuser|MoniqueRN}} (similar style, use of titles in username, related topic ])
* {{checkuser|Railton}}
* {{checkuser|God Allmighty}}
* {{checkuser|88.106.253.177}}
* {{checkuser|Anti Christ}}
* {{checkuser|Johnson MD}}
* {{checkuser|E Bear}}
* {{checkuser|Fuji San}}
* {{checkuser|Winston G}}
* {{checkuser|General_Tojo..........}}
* {{checkuser|General Tojo 3}}

:I'm wondering if we shouldn't do a range block on this one. There seem to be few other edits emanating from that range, and Tojo remains a complete and utter nuisance on the PD page as well as Japan-related articles. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 12:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

{{Clerk-Note}} Additional names added July 2. It should be noted that once a user has established a pattern of abusively using sockpuppets, it is not necessary to prove each one by technical investigation before taking action. ] 16:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

'''Agreed'''. I'll check the range (88.104.0.0/13) and implement a block shortly. ] ] 16:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*I'm seeing too much potential collateral damage here. Keep tagging them suspected; I'll try to keep up. ] ] 16:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

'''Well done. Keep the good work up.''' --] 18:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

*Always good to hear from our fans. I've applied a limited range-block; we'll see how it goes. ] ] 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
**since Gt is editing from IP's in the range of 88.106.100+.xx, wouldn't it be better to use a range block (88.106.255.0/13) or (88.106.255.0/15)? -- ] | ] 21:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
***You might have something there. ] ] 22:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

{{Clerk-Note}} moved commentary to talk page. ] 19:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

{{Clerk-Note}} This request is closed and the names added recently are probably not being seen by the checkusers. New suspects should be added to ] and you should post a notice at the ] to request that new sockpuppet accounts be blocked.] 16:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
</br>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 10:40, 3 April 2023

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/General Tojo}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Persistant usertalk vandal

Some users are endlessly defacing User talk:Chris 73. Since the attacks are always separated by at least a day, this is very probably the same IP again and again. Can you check that and block that IP for a long time if that's possible? Thanks! (I'd be very happy to file an abuse report :)) -- lucasbfr 18:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

PS: some users are tagged as being Tojo, but I'm not that sure (hence me not listing it there). -- lucasbfr 18:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
It's Tojo all right, and there are quite a few sockies under there. Can we possibly merge this case with General Tojo's cu history? I'll keep working the case here - Alison 18:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 IP blocked - the main IPs, as well as a few other socks - Alison 22:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

General Tojo

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 14:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

This user has been blocked indef, but multiple sockpuppets have been attacking User talk:Chris 73. They are adding sections exactly the same as other confirmed socks have done.

Soxred93 has a boring sig

 Clerk note: All of these accounts are now indef blocked. I just blocked Jules Verrne for personal attacks. -JodyB talk 17:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

 Confirmed - General Tojo (talk · contribs) = Foe Toe (talk · contribs), E Hyreet (talk · contribs), Enemy Forever (talk · contribs), Maj Tahal (talk · contribs), Uuuuuuuuuu 99 (talk · contribs), Uuuuuuuu 99 (talk · contribs), Uuuuuuu 99 (talk · contribs), Veneere (talk · contribs), 609872542 b (talk · contribs), Logon 789 (talk · contribs), Dr Von Reiksburg (talk · contribs), Lin Wun Du (talk · contribs), KK 91378 (talk · contribs), Lplplplplp (talk · contribs), XXX100 (talk · contribs), XXX101 (talk · contribs), Jules Verrne (talk · contribs), Kapibarra 1 (talk · contribs) - some of these are not yet blocked
 IP blocked - Alison 18:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 Clerk note:, the remainder of the confirmed accounts have been blocked, and all user pages tagged with the appropriate template and link to evidence. Anthøny 20:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


More:

Looks like they're finding a way around whatever IP block(s) were in place. – Luna Santin (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

 Confirmed, needless to say. Unfortunately, this editor is using three /17 ranges of a popular ISP and applying a rangeblock in any way will cause a lot of collateral damage - Alison 13:54, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah, tricky. Thanks for looking. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

General Tojo 3

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Behaviour highly typical for a Tojo sock on Parkinson's disease. More information on the LTA page and in previous requests. General Tojo (talk · contribs) is under a community ban for POV pushing, personal attacks and heavy sockpuppeteering on the Parkinson's page. JFW | T@lk 20:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

 Confirmed. Dmcdevit·t 09:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



General Tojo

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 22:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Possibility of these two user to be sockpuppets for the community banned vandal and mass sockpuppeteer General Tojo, (Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/General Tojo), suspicion based on edit history, also XX7 is used by Tojo on Meta. Chris 73 | Talk 22:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

 Clerk note: Histmerged from Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/General Tojo related. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Retract my request, was hanging around too long, currently not an issue. May reactivate this request if problems flare up again -- Chris 73 | Talk 23:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

General Tojo 2

Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse/General Tojo provides most details on this sad saga where one user mobilised 100s of sockpuppets to war with an increasing number of users, including several admins, with regards to Parkinson's disease. Tojo (a presumed alias of Keith Bridgeman) was blocked by community ban, and the ArbComm had to intervene to maximise the block. Now, a user has appeared that edited little during the PD wars but engaged in edits that were typical of Tojo (see User_talk:Gerard Doyle) but somehow managed to escape the blocks. This same user now pushes non-standard views on the Parkinson's page and makes accusations rather similar to Tojo's past defenses on his talkpage. JFW | T@lk 20:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

More info:
 Additional information needed Code letter and links/diffs as appropriate. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
More info added. JFW | T@lk 20:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

information Note: Someone who has older checkuser data on Tojo on file is going to have to handle this. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The deleted August 7 edits at Special:Undelete/Parkinson's_disease were made by Tojo socks and Tracer is a likely Tojo sock on meta if anyone has cross project Checkuser access. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Uninvited, you may have some of the earlier data on file yourself, per the second request here. Newyorkbrad 02:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
I think Fred Bauder would be best suited to check this one, since he has complied an extensive page about GT socks here. 01:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
RJ68 is definitely Tojo coming in from Emirates Telecommunications Corporation. I believe he lives in England, but somehow can use Emirates Telecommunications Corporation in Dubai. I hesitate to block this provider as some of the few Arabs who edit here use that provider. Emailing Emirates Telecommunications Corporation gets no response. Fred Bauder 02:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Checkuser is not really necessary to identify Tojo. He has a very limited repertoire of tendentious editing of Parkinson's disease and related articles and insertion of scurrilous information into articles about black athletes and entertainers. Fred Bauder 02:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Fred, our main concern is Gerard Doyle (talk · contribs). Could you check his origin (UK or Emirates?). JFW | T@lk 18:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.



The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

General Tojo2

A slightly non standard request. I'm trying to send a complaint to an ISP I'm probably going to need Ips but I will need the foundations permission for that. In the mean time I don't want the IP to be lost by falling out of the logs. So I would like the Ips to be extracted and and a record kept. Idealy a copy would be forwarded to Brad Patrick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geni (talk • contribs)

The dif I need IPs recorded from are:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

General Tojo

General Tojo was blocked for edit warring and disruption on Parkinson's disease and took to continuing to disrupt from IPs in the 88.104.0.0/13 range. After I semi-protected the article to stop the ongoing problems, the three users above showed up to continue with similar changes. GraemeL 14:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I've blocked Hirohito indefinitely for incendiary username, and Parkinsons for 48h for sockpuppeting using the Hirohito account. Their style (and choice of subject) is identical. A range block may become necessary if the disruption does not cease. JFW | T@lk 15:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

That's a deliberately false statement. General Tojo was blocked for the username. It was claimed to be not allowed, and so resulted in a blocking without complying with Wii requirements first. What you describe as warring and disruption was making improvements to the PD site. You specifically thanked me for making them !!! However, you obviousy have double standards. When you or somebody you agree with makes changes no matter how stupied you allow them. When I do exactly the same you desribe it as vandalaism or warring. You have obvious double standards depending on what suits your personal interest and prejudices. General Tojo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.216.81 (talk • contribs)

That user's only edits are in violating WP:NPA on two pages. I took the liberty of adding that address to your list of IP addresses since he claims to be Tojo. All of the contributions follow exactly the same style of writing, commenting, editwarring, 3RR violations, Personal Attacks, Bold Prefacing, massive editing, etc, along with claiming to be Tojo himself on talk pages without signing his name with tildes. Sincerely, Logical2u (Wikibreak) 19:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 Confirmed Mackensen (talk) 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Additional requests

Could you also investigate:

 Confirmed these as well. Mackensen (talk) 13:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Further additional requests

Additionally...

I'm wondering if we shouldn't do a range block on this one. There seem to be few other edits emanating from that range, and Tojo remains a complete and utter nuisance on the PD page as well as Japan-related articles. JFW | T@lk 12:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

 Clerk note: Additional names added July 2. It should be noted that once a user has established a pattern of abusively using sockpuppets, it is not necessary to prove each one by technical investigation before taking action. Thatcher131 16:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. I'll check the range (88.104.0.0/13) and implement a block shortly. Mackensen (talk) 16:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Well done. Keep the good work up. --General.Tojo 18:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

 Clerk note: moved commentary to talk page. Thatcher131 19:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

 Clerk note: This request is closed and the names added recently are probably not being seen by the checkusers. New suspects should be added to Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of General Tojo and you should post a notice at the administrator's noticeboard to request that new sockpuppet accounts be blocked.Thatcher131 16:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.