Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arthur Rubin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:43, 21 June 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,120 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Arthur Rubin/Archive 2014) (bot← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:52, 3 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,120 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Arthur Rubin/Archive 2024) (bot 
Line 3: Line 3:
|algo = old(28d) |algo = old(28d)
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive}}{{archive-nav|%(year)d}}
}} }}
{| {|
Line 8: Line 9:
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"
|- |-
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''28''' days are automatically archived to ''']''' . Sections without timestamps are not archived. |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''28''' days are automatically archived to ''']''' . Sections without timestamps are not archived.
|- |-
|} |}
|| {{archive box|<center>] ] ] ]</br/>] ] ] ] ] ]</center>}} || {{archive box|<center>] <br/> ] ] ] ]<br/>] ] ] ]<br/>] ] ] ]<br/>] ] ] ] <br/>] ] ] ]</center>}}
|} |}
{{User:Arthur Rubin/Vacation}} {{User:Arthur Rubin/Vacation}}
]


== TUSC token 6e69fadcf6cc3d11b5bd5144165f2991 == == TUSC token 6e69fadcf6cc3d11b5bd5144165f2991 ==


I am now proud owner of a account! I am now proud owner of a ] account!
__TOC__


== why???? == == Something ==


Hello there, dear sir. I would like to inform you that there is no need to have removed my edit to the year ]. The edit that I made to this page is a relevant edit. If you were to have read the page, you would have known that the actress who I edited onto the page was born in 1993, so technically it is relevant information. If you see this, please take note.
Thank you for deleting my posts I didnt know they bothered you i didnt know wikipedia was very territorial <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Thank you,
The Editor.


P.S. My account is both more than 4 days old and I have made more than 10 edits, so there is no real need to do this. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:11, November 25, 2019 (UTC)</small>
:The events you mentioned are not notable enough to justify including them in the general articles on the years which you edited. ] (]) 08:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


== Administrators' newsletter – November 2024 ==
== Request for comment ==


] from the past month (October 2024).
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by {{noping|Anna Frodesiak}}. Your comments ] is very much appreciated. Many thanks. ] through ] (]) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Jim Cartar@enwiki using the list at //en.wikipedia.org/Category:Wikipedia_administrators -->


]
== ] solution - chicago plan ==


] '''Administrator changes'''
Arthur, the Chicago plan is the most reasonable and elegant solution of the national debt issue. It's a pity that your incompetence in this area makes you to remove it from the page. On the same token one can remove a math theory just because they don't understand it. But editing wiki is your job, so its up to you. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:25, May 29, 2014‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:] {{hlist|class=inline
:It's not a "solution" (IMO), and not relevant to that article (clearly), and not yet sourced to a ] — ] ] 10:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
|]
:{{tps}} I looked at the reverted text, and my brain was mush after the 2nd paragraph. I agree with AR's edit summary that it read like gibberish. That said, the proper place for discussing this is the article talk page, so others can weight in also. Then again, any ed who refers to another's alleged "incompetence" doesn't really earn much credibility in my eyes. See ], ], and especially see ] ] (]) 11:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
}}
Read again what you have written. If alleged incompetence doesn't earn credibility, what ed with alleged gibberish does? If your brain is much after an astronomy bit does it mean that heliocentrism is gibberish? The reverted text mainly reiterates the section called 'The transformation' from the 'Chicago Plan Revisited' wiki page and should be well understood by an economist. This is more than relevant here, as the side effect of the proposed monetary reform is elimination of national debt which this article is about. Unclear description for wide public? Maybe. Gibberish and irrelevant? No way. I am not going to become an editor and spend time re-writing or further discussing this, you must be right re the wiki guidelines, but IMO thought provoking 'gibberish' is better than perfect nothing.<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:45, May 30, 2014‎</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:] {{hlist|class=inline
::In reply to ''I am not going to become an editor and spend time re-writing or further discussing this'' - ok ] (]) 12:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
|]

|]
== Invitation to vote on an article ==
|]
hello. since you are an editor of the article ], would you be interested in for it to make it a featured article or not? thank you for your time ] (]) 12:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
|]

|]
== prod of 2719 ==
|]

I removed a prod on ] thinking the editor had either misunderstood the lead or was deliberately being obtuse. I missed the significance of the ellipsis after "it says it's the largest known odd number". I've now just seen who put the prod there so I feel a bit sheepish but I actually still think prod was too abrupt. I have no difficulty at all with a merge to ] but we should keep the nugget that is is probably the largest such number (extraordinary to my mind), not merely the largest known. Also, of course and importantly, the references. We should keep a redirect. Now, I (we) could just go ahead and do that but seeing as you've raised the matter , I'll just lie low for the time being. ] (]) 17:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
:The problem with a straight merge is that there is too much material for a line item, and not enough ''credible'' material for an article. We have to decide how much material is credible and noteworthy. I'll take a stab at it, though. — ] ] 17:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
::I have added a bit more and it is still not the longest item on a number. This article is an absolute shocker with no references at all (until 2719!). I never followed what was happening back when these multimerges were going on. Were the original articles referenced and those got lost or were they never referenced in the first place? ] (]) 18:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Thincat}} I believe most of them weren't original articles at all, but most number articles ''are'' inadequately referenced. On the other hand, saying that {{num|412}} is even shouldn't require a reference. Exactly where the boundaries of ] fall for mathematical properties is the subject of some debate. — ] ] 21:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

== Chiefland Florida site ==

Hi,
I live near Levy County and have an update.. Duke Energy bought Progress Energy. They are decommissioning the nuke plant in Citrus County and have scrapped plans for the two plants in Levy County. I'm sure Chiefland was planning on benefiting from the Levy plants and it's mentioned in your article. I'm sure you can find references and update the Chiefland article fairly easily. Thanks for all you do.
] (]) 06:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

== L.A. events on June 21 and July 6 ==

{|style="{{divstylesiaaa}}{{border-radius|8px}}"
|-
!style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|
Upcoming L.A. events: ] (Saturday, June 21, 12-5pm) and ] (Sunday, July 6, ~9:30am-4pm)
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" |
{{multiple image
| align = right
| image1 = 356 S Mission.jpg
| width1 = 120
| caption1 = Gallery at 356 S. Mission Rd.
| image2 = BBQ - 001.jpg
| width2 = 120
| caption2 = Get hungry for the Wiknic!
| direction = vertical
}} }}
Dear fellow Wikipedian,


] '''CheckUser changes'''
The L.A. Misplaced Pages community has two exciting events coming up in the next few weeks: an edit-a-thon sponsored by the online magazine East of Borneo, and the fourth annual Los Angeles Wiknic!
:] ]


] '''Oversighter changes'''
The ''']''' is an ] that aims to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next chapter of their ] series will take place on Saturday, June 21, 2014 from 12pm to 5pm at 356 S. Mission Rd. (). Beginners welcome! Please ] if you plan to attend. For more info, see .
:] ]


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
The ''']''' is a part of the nationwide ]. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Misplaced Pages community! The event is tentatively planned for ] () and will be held on Sunday, July 6, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please ] and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!
* Following a ], the ] proposal that went for a trial to refine the ] (RfA) process has been discontinued.
* Following a ], ] is adopted as a policy.
I hope to see you there! ] (]) - via ] (]) 22:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


] '''Technical news'''
<small>To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from ].</small>
* Mass deletions done with the ] tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. {{phab|T366068}}
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Calliopejen1@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Meetup/LA/Invites&oldid=611792498 -->


] '''Arbitration'''
==2719, again==
* {{noping|RoySmith}}, {{noping|Barkeep49}} and {{noping|Cyberpower678}} have been appointed to the ] for the ]. {{noping|ThadeusOfNazereth}} and {{noping|Dr vulpes}} are reserve commissioners.
I reverted your (in effect) deletion of ]. I was too brusque and rude about it; I now am seeing that you indeed looked around to see if it was likely to be notable. I would still like to see an AFD process undergone in order to delete the article; regardless of that process, I erred in my behavior and would like to apologize. Thank you. ]] 22:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
* Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the ].
:{{ping|Red Slash}} I was wrong in proposing deletion; ''however'', all that should be in the article is in ], per ] convention. The rest of the <math>a x^2+b y^2+c z^2+d w^2</math> discussion should be at ], or at some other article on quadratic forms, not the article for any specific integer. In fact, much of it is at ]. — ] ] 02:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
* The Arbitration Committee is ] for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
] '''Miscellaneous'''
* An ] is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. ]


----
== Reversion of "system" page ==
{{center|{{flatlist|
* ]
* ]
* ]
}}}}
<!--
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 10:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1254686817 -->


== Books & Bytes – Issue 65 ==
Arthur


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Why remove all the improvements I made at the weekend?
<div style="font-size: 1.5em; margin: 0 100px;">
This has reintroduced errors and ambiguities.
]</div>
E.g. not all systems are activity systems (as some contributors have assumed).
<div style="line-height: 1.2;">
E.g. it is untrue that every system (e.g. the internet, or IBM) is bounded in space.
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">'''The Misplaced Pages Library''': ''Books & Bytes''</span><br />
E.g. "components" are probably better regarded as a subtype of "element".
Issue 65, September – October 2024
</div>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em;">
* Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
* Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
* Tech tip: Mass downloads
<big>''']'''</big>
</div>
</div>
<small>Sent by ] on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
<!-- Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=27730094 -->


== Administrators' newsletter – December 2024 ==
And why say the source quoted is unreliable?
It is backed up by detail research and references, and more reliable than some of the other sources.


] from the past month (November 2024).
The result of reverting is that my web site defines a system better than Misplaced Pages.


]
Kind regards
Graham <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


] '''Administrator changes'''
:]s are bounded spatially. For example, the Internet is confined to the surface of the Earth. ] (]) 11:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
|]
}}


] '''Interface administrator changes'''
No. The internet can involve radio transmissions that are not confined to the surface of the earth, but that is irrelevant here. "Bounded spatially" does not mean limited in terms of geographic locations you might find it in. It means the system is separable from its environment by a boundary that is definable in space. Physical systems may be bounded. A clock is bounded. But there is no 3-dimensional boundary surrounding IBM, the US government, the Yankee baseball team, the justice system, or Dewey Decimal Classification System, or any system that is conceptual or logical. The notion that a system has a boundary is primarily and generally a logical one. If the Misplaced Pages entry does not make that clear then it will remain too naïve for me to refer students to.
:] {{hlist|class=inline
|]
|]
}}
:] ]


] '''CheckUser changes'''
Compare the pre-revision version with the last one I posted yesterday, I believe the latter is more accurate and clearly expressed on several points, not only the one above. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:] {{hlist|class=inline

|]
:It ''might'' be more accurate, but it's a lot of information with no credible (or ]) source. However, I don't think "systems" like IBM really can be treated under ], so it may be counterproductive to extend the definition of "system". — ] ] 16:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
|]

}}
Please read "EA as applied system theory" on the home page at avancier.co.uk for a short overview of how businesses and business systems have been treated as systems - exactly in line with system theory - since the 1970s.

The current page is wrong on some points and misleading on others. I inserted a reference to a reputable paper on my web site, not wanting to take personal credit, but I have been working with systems in theory and in practice, and teaching systems analysis and design since 1980, so if referring to me personally is more "reliable", then we can do that. Or else, we can remove any reference to me or my web site. I don't care about the reference as much as improving what looks like a naïve and inadequate page at the moment. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


] '''Guideline and policy news'''
Arthur - I await your explanation of why you have reverted to an inferior version of the page - how to improve it in some or all ways I proposed - and what you will count as a "reliable source" - Graham <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 10:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* Following ], the ] has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the ] within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
:Please read ] which ]s ]. ''My'' understanding is that a source may be reliable if it is a published, reviewed, paper, by an organization with a reputation for accuracy (and not an advertisement, editorial, or press release); or published by a recognized expert in the field without a reputation for inaccuracy (but not ''about'' his own work, about living people other than himself, or about controversial topics). — ] ] 19:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
* Following a ], a new speedy deletion criterion, ], has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.
:avancier.co.uk is a commercial site, and the description of "system" you quote is part of an advertisement for what they do. — ] ] 19:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


] '''Technical news'''
== Reply via your message to me ==
* Technical volunteers can now register for the ], which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.
Um dude... I don't know who you think you are saying that I'm being paid by rossi because I just created a new account. I actually had a previous account, but forgot my username and decided to make a new one using the username that I now use for all we sites (see escapist magazine, mtgsalvation.com, @gmail, etc.), I am certain that I *will* get around to editing other articles as I see omitted sections, or errors. I am an Engineering Geologist and Ecologist by trade, and have a healthy amount of scepticism about rossi and cold fusion which I have been following for several years. I am a scientist, and believe in the scientific method. I think that the way that cold fusion was 'debunked' and then subsequently persecuted bears some similarities to scientific breakthroughs of the past (geocentricity, plate tectonics, etc).


] '''Arbitration'''
By careful study of relevant information (even non peer reviewed stuff, since thats the only place that the good scientists can go these days in this field) I have come to the conclusion that the reality of the effect is undeniable and that while a healthy amount of doubt is fine, *blind* outright denial is not. (note that *blind* here refers to without reading the relevant source material, a thoroughly unscientific and unacceptable stance.
* The arbitration case '']'' (formerly titled '']'') has been closed.
* An arbitration case titled '']'' has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.


----
SO yes, I will post on the Talk page, and I do have a point of view. However I do not hold that wikipedia is at fault for any of this, it is however the fault of the wider scientific community, which its denial of CF has meant that blind skeptics have far more peer reviewed and mainstream sources than do supporters or scientists in the field.] (]) 05:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
{{center|{{flatlist|
:@{{U|Insertcleverphrasehere}}, I have no doubt that Fleischmann and Pons found ''something'', even though even they could not replicate their result. It could have been increased fusion in adsorbed deuterium on newly forged platinum, but it could have just been energy of adsorbtion. I have no doubt that Rossi has ''not'' found something, or some of his demonstrations would have had the input power monitored. We all know the ''proper'' way to test a "black box" energy producing device; have third-party testers bring their own equipment with their own power supply. Even then, it would not be ''impossible'' for the "black box" to draw power from the external test equipment, but it would be difficult. (As we're talking about a "black box", even if he had found something, it would be difficult to determine whether it was a nuclear reaction or a superbattery, but either would be of interest.) There are enough &mdash; well, ]s &mdash; who would be willing and able to perform the appropriate tests. (I've met one.)
* ]
:I can see your point, that a ] who produces a power source of some sort, without a theory, or with the theory contradicting "known" physics, would be unlikely to be published in peer-reviewed journals. But it is not Misplaced Pages's job to be ahead of reliable sources. Not all CF researchers fall into that category; after all, there is measurable fusion in DT (<sup>2</sup>H<sup>3</sup>H) at {{convert|1000|atm|abbr=on}}, and theory predicts that, at higher pressures, you could reach break-even, if there were materials that would contain the "gas". — ] ] 06:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
* ]
::you act like I support him unconditionally, I do not. your comments about a theory are not helpful, it is not necessary to have a theory to make a working device... just look at ] technology. I am not going to argue about why I think it is more likely that Rossi has something than that he does not, its my opinion that i have arrived at after careful weight of the evidence.] (]) 08:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
* ]
:::I suggest checking out the following article, while very slightly biased, and I do not agree with all of the points that they try to make, it does provide a fairly intelligent and comprehensive view on the Rossi and other LENR devices. I'd be curious to know what your opinion is of it. http://lenrftw.net/are_lenr_devices_real.html#.U51n5nmhPVI] (]) 08:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
}}}}<!--
::::I haven't read ''all'' the E-Cat studies carefully, but the ones I've read made no or inadequate efforts to measure the electrical input from "wall sockets", etc. Most of the "counterpoint" seem stronger than the "point" to me; I have read most of the NASA studies, and they all said something along the lines of: This is extremely unlikely, but the gain if it worked is so great that the net benefit is reasonable, as far as one can analyze improbable outcomes with great gains. (I wish NASA would put more effort into the near-Earth asteroid watch. There, although we know it's improbable at any given time, we (believe, anyway, although some would say "know") that it ''has'' happened a number of times over the past billion years.) Although I cannot find enough information for a Misplaced Pages comment, NASA and JPL (where I did work for a time) ''were'' known for experimenting with unusual technologies in the slim hope of producing a scientific breakthrough. The projects were known as "purple pigeons" (as opposed to "white rats", I believe.) With the current political climate, I doubt that they could do such a thing now except in a director's "discretionary fund". Much of the rest of the paper you pointed me to is trying to analyze the chance of something being accurate based only on the promoter's (and would-be promoters') statements. The paper's interpretation of why Rossi's previous company went under is plausible, but not proven. It's also plausible (but not proven) that Rossi was and is a con-man. The paper also avoids noting that the isotopic composition of the alleged transmutation matches naturally occurring isotopic composition, which seems unlikely for a nuclear reaction. Although I don't remember reading the Toyota paper, transmuting <sub>55</sub>Cs to <sub>59</sub>Pr without producing measurable amounts of <sub>56</sub>Ba, <sub>57</sub>La, or <sub>58</sub>Ce seems unlikely without using particle beams of <sub>5</sub>B or heavier, especially considering the increased stability of atoms with an even number of protons (or neutrons). But I'm not sure of the isotopic stability regions near there, so it might conceivably be plausible. In other words, it's "magic", rather than "technology". (And I know Clarke's 3rd law and its converse.)
-->{{center|1=<small>Sent by ] (]) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC)</small>}}
::::Little of this should be on Misplaced Pages, but let me point out that I know (at least to the point that I'm able and willing to talk to them personally) one "mad scientist" (he has a prototype "warm fusion" reactor, but it doesn't look as if it will reach break-even) and two science fiction writers who know "mad scientists", who would almost certainly be willing and able to develop a test protocol which would determine that the E-Cat either: (1) had some reaction producing more energy than a chemical reaction would; (2) Have a battery with energy storage density considerably greater than presently known or believed to be possible; or (3) have the capacity to draw power from nearby, but not connected, electrical equipment. (If the 3rd-party test equipment uses power, it is not a "violation" of the laws of physics for the E-Cat to draw on that power, even if the equipment was not designed to have its power tapped.) Furthermore, the "mad scientist" is apparently working with the military, and the science fiction writers have enough fans, that, if this protocol determined the E-Cat worked, there would be little doubt that it ''actually'' worked. Since Rossi has not done even what Randi suggested as part of a protocol, one would have to presume he doesn't want skeptical people to believe his process works.
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_newsletter/Subscribe&oldid=1259680487 -->
:::: — ] ] 09:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:52, 3 December 2024

Write a new message. I will reply on this page, under your post.
This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any sections older than 28 days are automatically archived to User talk:Arthur Rubin/Archive 2025 . Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Archiving icon
Archives
undated
2005 2006 2007 2008
2009 2010 2011 2012
2013 2014 2015 2016
2017 2018 2019 2020
2021 2022 2023 2024

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Status

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages because of hostile editing environment.

TUSC token 6e69fadcf6cc3d11b5bd5144165f2991

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Something

Hello there, dear sir. I would like to inform you that there is no need to have removed my edit to the year 1993. The edit that I made to this page is a relevant edit. If you were to have read the page, you would have known that the actress who I edited onto the page was born in 1993, so technically it is relevant information. If you see this, please take note. Thank you, The Editor.

P.S. My account is both more than 4 days old and I have made more than 10 edits, so there is no real need to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Impishfont (talk • contribs) 23:11, November 25, 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Misplaced Pages Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

  • Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Misplaced Pages Library
  • Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
  • Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Misplaced Pages Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Category: