Misplaced Pages

Jennifer's Body: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:23, 1 July 2014 editSock (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,917 edits Casting: Since the source is censored, we technically need to bracket this← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:01, 24 December 2024 edit undo176.250.145.82 (talk) Fixed typoTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(798 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2009 film by Karyn Kusama}}
{{About|the 2009 film|the Hole song|Jennifer's Body (Hole song)|the Ken Carson song|Jennifer's Body (Ken Carson song)}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use American English|date=August 2022}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2023}}
{{Infobox film {{Infobox film
| name = Jennifer's Body | name = Jennifer's Body
| image = Jennifers body ver2.jpg | image = Jennifers body ver2.jpg
| alt = Jennifer holding books in her arms sitting on a school desk, wearing a red top and short plaid skirt, in front of a blackboard with the words HELL YES! written in chalk. A hand can be seen trapped by the lid of the schooldesk. The poster bears the tagline "She's evil... and not just high school evil" in white block capitals, with the film title underneath in large red block capitals. <!-- See ] --> | alt = Jennifer holding books in her arms sitting on a school desk, wearing a red top and short plaid skirt, in front of a blackboard with the words HELL YES! written in chalk. A hand can be seen trapped by the lid of the school desk. The poster bears the tagline "She's evil ... and not just high school evil" in white block capitals, with the film title underneath in large red block capitals. <!-- See ] -->
| caption = Theatrical Release Poster | caption = Theatrical release poster
| director = ] | director = ]
| producer = {{Plain list | | writer = ]
| producer = {{Plainlist|
* Daniel Dubiecki
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
}} }}
| writer = ] | starring = {{Plainlist|
* ]
| starring = {{Plain list |
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
}} }}
| music = {{Unbulleted list|]|]}}
| cinematography = ] | cinematography = ]
| editing = Plummy Tucker | editing = Plummy Tucker
| music = {{Plainlist|
| studio = ] <!-- Fox Atomic produced the film -->
* ]
* ]
}}
| production_companies = {{Plainlist|
* ]
* ]
}}
| distributor = ]<!-- 20th Century Fox distributed the film --> | distributor = ]<!-- 20th Century Fox distributed the film -->
| released = {{Film date|2009|09|10|]|2009|09|18|United States}}<!--- per ] ---> | released = {{Film date|2009|09|10|]|2009|09|18|United States}}<!--- per ] --->
| runtime = 102 minutes<!--Theatrical runtime: 102:14--><ref>{{cite web | url=https://bbfc.co.uk/releases/jennifers-body-2009-1 | title=''Jennifer's Body'' (15) | publisher=] | date=August 17, 2009 | access-date=September 19, 2014}}</ref>
| runtime = 102 minutes
| country = United States | country = United States
| language = English | language = English
| budget = $16 million<ref name="mojo" /> | budget = $16 million
| gross = $31,556,061<ref name="mojo" /> | gross = $31.6 million
}} }}
'''''Jennifer's Body''''' is a 2009 ] ] written by ] and directed by ]. The film stars ], ], ], and ]. Fox portrays a newly ] cheerleader who kills her male classmates, with her best friend striving to stop her. The film premiered at the ]<ref>{{Citation | title = TIFF 2009: Jennifer's Body premiere photos
| url = http://www.digitalhit.com/galleries/34/494 | year = 2009 | last1 = Evans| first1 = Ian | last2 = Lambert| first2 = Christine | accessdate = 2009-11-27}}</ref> and was released in the United States and Canada on September 18, 2009.<ref name="Access Hollywood premiere of Jennifer's Body"> video from . Retrieved 2009-11-25.</ref> The title is a reference to the song of the same name by alternative rock band ] on their album '']''. As a ] to the film, ] produced a ''Jennifer's Body'' ], released in August 2009.


'''''Jennifer's Body''''' is a 2009 American ] film directed by ] and written by ]. Starring ], ], ], ], ], and ]. The film follows Jennifer Check (Fox), a ] high school student who kills her male classmates and devours their flesh in order to survive, while her bookworm best friend Anita "Needy" Lesnicki (Seyfried) must find a way to end her killing spree.
Working with Cody again following their collaborative efforts on the film '']'', ] stated he and his producers "want to make unusual films".<ref name="www.hollywoodreporter.com">{{cite news |last= Kit | first= Borys| title= Reitman has the jump on Cody's 'Body'|work= ]|date=2007-11-13|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i26138003c343f1a15375cde64a1c96ef| accessdate= 2008-02-11 |archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20080628234946/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i26138003c343f1a15375cde64a1c96ef <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archivedate = 2008-06-28}} {{Subscription}}</ref> Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends.<ref name="in.reuters.com">{{cite web|first=Jennifer|last=Kwan|title=Cody exorcises demons from "Jennifer's Body"|publisher=Reuters|date=2009-09-14|accessdate=2009-09-23|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idINTRE58C0ZI20090914}}</ref>

Working with Cody again following their collaborative efforts on '']'' (2007), ] stated he and his producers "want to make unusual films".<ref name="www.hollywoodreporter.com">{{cite news |last= Kit | first= Borys| title= Reitman has the jump on Cody's 'Body'|work= ]|date=November 13, 2007|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i26138003c343f1a15375cde64a1c96ef| access-date= February 11, 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080705191205/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i26138003c343f1a15375cde64a1c96ef <!-- Bot retrieved archive --> |archive-date = July 5, 2008}} {{Subscription required}}</ref> Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends.<ref name="in.reuters.com">{{cite web|first=Jennifer|last=Kwan|title=Cody exorcises demons from "Jennifer's Body"|publisher=Reuters|date=September 14, 2009|access-date=September 23, 2009|url=http://in.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idINTRE58C0ZI20090914|archive-date=September 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918041358/http://in.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idINTRE58C0ZI20090914|url-status=dead}}</ref> As a ] to the film, ] produced a ''Jennifer's Body'' ], released in August 2009.

''Jennifer's Body'' premiered at the ] on September 10, 2009,<ref>{{Citation| title = TIFF 2009: Jennifer's Body premiere photos| url = http://www.digitalhit.com/galleries/34/494| year = 2009| last1 = Evans| first1 = Ian| last2 = Lambert| first2 = Christine| access-date = November 27, 2009| archive-date = June 8, 2011| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110608005424/http://www.digitalhit.com/galleries/34/494| url-status = live}}</ref> and was theatrically released in the United States and Canada on September 18, 2009.<ref name="Access Hollywood premiere of Jennifer's Body"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091129224920/http://www.accesshollywood.com/2009-toronto-film-festival-megan-foxs-jennifers-body-premiere_video_1156312 |date=November 29, 2009 }} video from {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090713232449/http://www.accesshollywood.com/ |date=July 13, 2009 }}. Retrieved November 25, 2009.</ref> The film was a commercial failure, grossing $31.6 million against its $16 million production budget, and received mixed reviews from critics, with its dialogue, emotional resonance, and performances of the cast being praised, while the narrative and uneven tone were criticized.<ref name="www.rottentomatoes.com">{{cite web| url = https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jennifers_body/| title = Jennifer's Body (2009)| publisher = ]| work = ]| date = March 8, 2018| access-date = April 20, 2020| archive-date = April 28, 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200428204517/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jennifers_body| url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="www.slate.com">{{cite web|first=Dana|last=Stevens|title=Jennifer's Body|work=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 19, 2009|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2228708/|archive-date=September 22, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090922182806/http://www.slate.com/id/2228708|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="www.sfgate.com">{{cite web|first=Peter|last=Hartlaub|title='Jennifer Body' sags under weight of cleverness|work=San Francisco Chronicle|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/17/MVM219NK8K.DTL&type=movies|archive-date=September 30, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090930225936/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/17/MVM219NK8K.DTL&type=movies|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="movies.nytimes.com">{{cite web|first=A.O.|last=Scott|title=Jennifer's Body (2009): Hell Is Other People, Especially the Popular Girl|work=The New York Times|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=https://movies.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/movies/18jennifer.html|archive-date=September 22, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090922220403/http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/movies/18jennifer.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


Following revelations that the film's poor marketing campaign was the result of the studio's desire to capitalize on Fox's sex appeal and gear the film towards a younger male audience, ''Jennifer's Body'' has undergone a critical reevaluation in the years since its release, and has been described as a ] ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Comeback Kid: Jennifer's Body – revaluated in the #MeToo era |url=https://theeverydaymagazine.co.uk/photographyandfilm/-jennifers-body-revaluated-in-the-metoo-era |access-date=January 11, 2023 |website=The Everyday |date=April 19, 2022 |language=en-US |archive-date=January 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111183256/https://theeverydaymagazine.co.uk/photographyandfilm/-jennifers-body-revaluated-in-the-metoo-era |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=How Jennifer's Body went from a flop in 2009 to a feminist cult classic today |url=https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/31/18037996/jennifers-body-flop-cult-classic-feminist-horror |access-date=January 11, 2023 |website=www.vox.com |date=October 31, 2018 |language=en |archive-date=January 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115145332/https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/31/18037996/jennifers-body-flop-cult-classic-feminist-horror |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/a-misunderstood-horror-film-turns-10-we-call-it-a-nerds-frightful-delight/|title=Horror film Jennifer's Body bombed 10 years ago; now it's a cult classic|date=September 21, 2019|access-date=August 22, 2024|website=]|last=Ouellette|first=Jennifer|archive-date=April 21, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240421144728/https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/a-misunderstood-horror-film-turns-10-we-call-it-a-nerds-frightful-delight/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Colangelo |first=B. J. |date=May 5, 2022 |title=How Jennifer's Body Became A True Cult Classic |url=https://www.slashfilm.com/853717/how-jennifers-body-became-a-true-cult-classic/ |access-date=January 11, 2023 |website=/Film |language=en-US |archive-date=January 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230111183254/https://www.slashfilm.com/853717/how-jennifers-body-became-a-true-cult-classic/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
The film had a disappointing performance at the North American ], making $2.8 million its opening day and $6.8 million its opening weekend,<ref name="mojo">{{cite web|title=JENNIFER'S BODY|publisher=]|accessdate=2009-10-21|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jennifersbody.htm}}</ref><ref name="theboxofficejunkie.com">{{cite web|url = http://blog.theboxofficejunkie.com/2009/09/friday-estimates-meatballs-headed-for.html| title = Friday Estimates: Meatballs And Informant Do Well, Jennifer's Body And Love Happens Don't| publisher = The Box Office Junkie| date = September 19, 2009}}</ref> and received mixed reviews from critics; whereas negative reviews criticized the narrative and, specifically, the horror/comic premise for "fail to be either funny or scary enough to satisfy", positive reviews praised the film for its dialogue, performances, and emotional resonance.<ref name="www.rottentomatoes.com">{{cite web| url = http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jennifers_body/|title = Jennifer's Body (2009) |publisher= ] | work = ]|date = September 15, 2009}}</ref><ref name="www.slate.com">{{cite web|first=Dana|last=Stevens|title=Jennifer's Body|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-19|url=http://www.slate.com/id/2228708/}}</ref><ref name="www.sfgate.com">{{cite web|first=Peter|last=Hartlaub|title=
'Jennifer Body' sags under weight of cleverness|work=San Francisco Chronicle|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/17/MVM219NK8K.DTL&type=movies}}</ref><ref name="movies.nytimes.com">{{cite web|first=A.O.|last=Scott|title=Jennifer's Body (2009): Hell Is Other People, Especially the Popular Girl|work=The New York Times|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/movies/18jennifer.html?ref=movies}}</ref>


==Plot== ==Plot==
Anita "Needy" Lesnicki, once an insecure and studious teenager living in the small town of ], ], is now a violent mental inmate who narrates the story as a flashback while in ].
Anita "Needy" Lesnicki (]), once an insecure teenager, is now a violent ] inmate who narrates the story as a ] while in ]. She has been friends with a selfish and popular ], Jennifer Check (]), since childhood, despite having little in common. One night, Jennifer takes Needy to a local ] to attend a concert by ] band Low Shoulder. A suspicious fire engulfs the bar, killing several, and Jennifer who is in shock, agrees to leave with the band despite Needy's attempts to stop her. Later that evening, Jennifer, covered in blood, appears in Needy's kitchen and proceeds to eat food from the refrigerator. Unable to digest the matter, she vomits a trail of black, spiny fluid and then leaves in a hurry as Needy calls after her.


Since childhood, Needy has been best friends with Jennifer Check, a popular and beautiful high school ], despite the two having little in common. Jennifer often mistreats and dominates Needy, who is too in awe of her to stand up for herself. One night, Jennifer takes Needy to a local ] to attend a concert by the ] band Low Shoulder. A fire engulfs the bar, killing several people. Jennifer, in shock from the fire, leaves with the band even though Needy tells her not to. Later that evening, she appears in Needy's kitchen, covered in blood, and attempts to eat a ]. She immediately vomits a trail of black fluid and almost bites Needy's neck, but retreats and leaves.
The next morning at school, Jennifer appears fine and shrugs off Needy's concerns. While the small town is devastated by the deaths caused by the fire, Jennifer seduces the school's football captain in the woods and then kills him; his ] corpse is later found. Meanwhile, the members of Low Shoulder gain popularity due to their rumored ] during the fire and offer to make a charity appearance at the school's spring formal.


The next morning at school, Jennifer appears fine and dismisses Needy's concerns, appearing apathetic to the fire tragedy. She seduces the school's football captain and lures him into the woods where she ] and ] him. Meanwhile, Low Shoulder gains popularity due to their falsely rumored heroism during the fire, and offer to make a charity appearance at the school's spring formal.
A month later, Jennifer is beginning to look pale, and accepts a date with school ]/] Colin (]), whom she brutally kills that night. While Needy and her boyfriend, Chip (]) have sex, Needy senses something dreadful has happened. She leaves in a panic and almost runs over Jennifer, drenched in blood. She rushes home and finds Jennifer in her bedroom. Jennifer kisses her, initiating a brief ] session, and soon explains what happened after the fire: Low Shoulder took her into the woods and offered her as a ] ] to ] in exchange for fame and fortune. Although the sacrifice and greedy exchange were a success, Jennifer was in fact not a virgin, and when the lead singer Nikolai (]) murdered her, the ritual backfired and a ]ic spirit ]. Unbeknownst to Needy, Jennifer also encountered the Indian exchange student Ahmet after the fire and, upon hearing that no one knew he had survived, took him into the woods and ate him, rendering him her first victim. Jennifer states that she can withstand virtually any injury without pain and is rather difficult to kill.


A month later, Jennifer appears sick and listless. She accepts a date with school ]/] Colin, whom she invites to an abandoned house; once there she brutally kills and devours him. While Needy and her boyfriend Chip have sex, Needy senses something dreadful has happened and has a disturbing vision of a demonic Jennifer. She flees back home but on the way she is accosted by Jennifer, who is drenched in blood. After making it home unhurt, Needy finds a revitalized and amorous Jennifer in her bed. Jennifer attempts to seduce Needy by kissing her; Needy initially reciprocates but then comes to her senses and demands an explanation.
The next day at school, as the town is stunned by Colin's death, Needy goes to the school library's ] section and surmises that Jennifer is a ]; she is weakest when she is hungry, and must feed on flesh in order to sustain her life and appearance. Needy tells Chip about her discoveries and warns him not to attend the school dance. He does not believe her and she subsequently breaks up with him in order to protect him. Chip goes to the dance, hoping to meet with Needy, but is instead intercepted by Jennifer, who seduces him and takes him to an abandoned pool house. Needy arrives there and finds Jennifer feeding on Chip. Needy tries to drown Jennifer but Jennifer, hovering in the air, attacks her. She is then stabbed by Chip with a pool skimmer. Jennifer escapes while Needy watches her boyfriend die.


Jennifer reveals that Low Shoulder had taken her into the woods after the bar fire and offered her as a virgin ] to ] in exchange for fame and fortune. Although the sacrifice was a success, Jennifer was not actually a virgin, so she became permanently possessed. She became hungry and Ahmet, a foreign exchange student, who was thought to have died in the fire, was her first victim. She had intended to eat Needy as well, but left because she could not bring herself to hurt her best friend. When she has eaten, she can withstand virtually any injury without pain, healing instantly.
Needy decides she must kill Jennifer for the common good. She goes to Jennifer's home and sees Jennifer picking out her next victims in her yearbook. Crashing through the window, Needy engages in a fight with Jennifer wielding a ]. Culminating with a stab to the heart, Needy finally destroys the demon and kills her. Jennifer's mother enters and finds Needy with the box cutter on top of her daughter's body. Soon after, Needy is brought to an ]. Since she was bitten non-fatally by Jennifer, she has obtained some of Jennifer's supernatural powers, such as the ability to hover in the air. Set upon revenge for what was done to Jennifer and her, she escapes the mental facility and hitchhikes a ride to the hotel where Low Shoulder are staying; there, she slaughters the members, whose killings are later discovered by local authorities.


Needy goes to the school library's ] section and determines that Jennifer is a ] who must feed on flesh and can only be killed while she is hungry and weak. Needy tells Chip about Jennifer. He does not believe her, so she breaks up with him in order to protect him. Jennifer intercepts Chip on the way to the school dance and lies to him, saying that Needy had been cheating on him with Colin. She takes him to an abandoned pool and begins feeding on him. Needy arrives and Chip impales Jennifer through the stomach with a pool skimmer. Jennifer escapes and Chip dies.
== Casting ==
] was in negotiations to star as Jennifer Check since the film was announced in 2007, and was officially cast in October 2007.<ref>{{cite news| author= Mr. Disgusting | title= Megan Fox to Star in Supernatural-Comedy 'Jennifer's Body'| url= http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10237| publisher= ] | date=2007-10-23|accessdate= 2008-02-11}}</ref> Fox said the reason she agreed to the role was her love for the script. "I think what I loved about the movie is it's so unapologetic and how completely inappropriate it is at all times," she said. "That was my favorite part about the script and about the character. It's fun to be able to say the shit that she got to say and get away with it and how people find it charming."<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> Asked how acting in a film like this is different from acting in '']'', Fox said "there's distractions, like there's no robots to distract you from whatever performance I do give. So, if it's terrible, you're gonna fucking know that it's really terrible".<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> She said despite this aspect of the business being intimidating, she enjoyed portraying the character. "I wasn't really sure what I was doing," said Fox. "I was just trying to have fun with it and I felt like I was able to make fun of my own image as to how some people might perceive Megan Fox to be. I was just sort of flying freely and I hope some of it works." <ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> To prepare for her role as a living-dead teenager, Fox dropped to a near frail 97 pounds and stayed out of the sun to keep her skin pale.


Angry and heartbroken, Needy breaks into Jennifer's bedroom. The two fight and Jennifer bites Needy's shoulder in the struggle. Needy rips Jennifer's best friend necklace off her neck. Jennifer stops fighting back and Needy stabs her in the heart with a ], killing her and destroying the demon. Jennifer's mother enters and finds Needy on top of her dead daughter's body. Needy is brought to an ]. She now manifests some of Jennifer's supernatural powers due to the bite. She escapes the mental facility and hitchhikes a ride, telling the driver she is following a band.
In balancing out the film's horror with humor, Fox said she relied heavily on ]'s script and ]'s direction to pull it off. "I have a very specific sense of humor, things that I think are funny aren't going to fly with middle America," she stated. "It's going to eliminate some of the audience, so you need someone there to tell you you can't do that."<ref name="shocktillyoudrop.com">{{cite web |first=Ryan |last=Rotten |title= Megan Fox Talks Jennifer's Body FX |publisher=shocktillyoudrop.com |date=2009-07-29|accessdate=2009-09-26 |url=http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=11239 }}</ref>


A home video and crime scene photos show that the members of Low Shoulder have been murdered in their hotel by Needy.
In February 2008, ] was cast as Anita "Needy" Lesnicki, the "plain Jane" best friend to Fox's character with whom she shares a somewhat ] infatuation.<ref name="Seyfried">{{cite news |last= Kit | first= Borys| last2= Simmons | first2= Leslie
| title= Seyfried in 'Body' cast | publisher= ] |date=2008-02-08 | url = http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb |accessdate= 2008-02-11 }} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}} {{Subscription}}</ref><ref name="www.afterellen.com">{{cite web |first=Jamie |last=Murnane| title=Diablo Cody didn't do the same-sex kiss in "Jennifer's Body" for publicity| publisher=] |date=2009-09-08| accessdate=2009-09-26| url=http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jamiemurnane/diablo-cody-didnt-do-the-same-sex-kiss-in-jennifer-body-for-publicity }}</ref> Seyfried said it was a relief to play the nerdy character opposite Fox. "Being a lead (like Megan), you have that weird pressure of feeling like you have to look attractive," she stated. "In this movie, I didn't worry about any of that . I don't want to play the one that everybody is supposed to want to have sex with."<ref name="wWw.afterellen.com">{{cite web |first=Jen| last=Sabella |title=Amanda Seyfried rolls her eyes about kissing Megan Fox|publisher=]| date=2009-08-18| accessdate=2009-10-14 | url=http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jensabella/amanda-seyfried-rolls-her-eyes-about-kissing-megan-fox }}</ref>


==Cast==
Chud.com reported that the filmmakers were looking at actual rock band members ] of ] and ] of ] to portray male lead Nikolai Wolf. Also considered was actor ].<ref>{{cite news| last = Faraci | first= Devin| title = Jennifer's body is going authentically Emo!| publisher= Chud.com| date= 2008-02-05| url = http://chud.com/articles/articles/13528/1/JENNIFER039S-BODY-IS-GOING-AUTHENTICALLY-EMO/Page1.html| accessdate= 2008-02-11}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> In March 2008, actor ] was reportedly cast as Nikolai.<ref>{{cite news| last= Perry| first= Byron| title= Johnny Simmons| work=]| date=2008-03-05| url = http://variety.com/2008/scene/people-news/johnny-simmons-1117981899/ | accessdate= 2014-01-10 }}</ref> However, ] was officially cast in the role of Nikolai, while Simmons was then given the role of Chip Dove. Brody said he did not do his own vocals. "My singing voice is still going through puberty," he said. "They gave me a singing lesson or two, and it's not the worst thing in the world, but it's not anything anyone would choose to hear."<ref name="popwatch.ew.com">{{cite web|first=Mandi|last=Bierly|title='Jennifer's Body' bad boy Adam Brody takes the EW Pop Culture Personality Test|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-24|url=http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/09/18/jennifers-body-bad-boy-adam-brody-takes-the-ew-pop-culture-personality-test/}}</ref>
{{Cast listing|
* ] as Jennifer Check
* ] as Anita "Needy" Lesnicki
* ] as Nikolai Wolf
* ] as Chip Dove
* ] as Mr. Wroblewski
* ] as Toni Lesnicki
* ] as Colin Gray
* ] as Mrs. Dove
* ] as Officer Roman Duda
* ] as Mrs. Check
* ] as Dirk
* ] as Officer Warzak
* Valerie Tian as Chastity
* Aman Johal as Ahmet
* Josh Emerson as Jonas Kozelle
* ] as Jonas' dad
* ] as the driver near the end of film
* Michael Brock as Goth Boy
* ] as Goth Girl #1
* ] as Goth Girl #2
}}


==Production==
Additional cast members include ] as Mr. Wroblewski, ] as Colin Gray, ] as Toni Lesnicki, ] as Mrs. Dove, Carrie Genzel as Mrs. Check, Juan Riedinger as Dirk, ] as Officer Roman Duda, Juno Ruddell as Officer Warzak, ] as Chasity, Keegan Sigurnjak as Meek School Nerd, ] as Ahmet from India, Josh Emerson as Jonas Kozelle and ] as the driver near the end of film. A number of supporting and minor roles were filled by supporting and minor cast members from ]'s previous films '']'' and '']'', including Simmons, Brody, Johal and ].


== Production == ===Development===
''Jennifer's Body'' is the follow-up to writer and producer Diablo Cody and Jason Reitman's collaboration efforts on ''].'' In October 2007, ] pre-emptively purchased the rights to Cody's script with Megan Fox to star. Peter Rice, who at the time oversaw ] and Fox Atomic, brought in the project as Fox Searchlight had previously distributed Cody's film ''Juno''.<ref name="Cody Body">{{cite news|last1=Kit |first1=Borys |last2=Simmons |first2=Leslie |title=Atomic has Cody 'Body,' Fox part |work=] |date=October 23, 2007 |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb |access-date=February 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100110213754/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb |archive-date=January 10, 2010 }} {{Subscription required}}</ref> Mason Novick and Reitman's producing partner Dan Dubiecki signed as producers in November 2007 with plans to produce the film under Hard C, which is housed at Fox Searchlight. Reitman commented, "We want to make unusual films, and anything that turns a genre on its ear interests Dan and I."<ref name=www.hollywoodreporter.com/> ] took over as director in January 2008.<ref>{{cite news | last= Fleming| first= Michael| title= Kusama to direct Cody's 'Body'| work= ]| date= January 7, 2008| url= https://variety.com/2008/film/markets-festivals/kusama-to-direct-cody-s-body-1117978567/ | access-date= February 11, 2008}}</ref> Kusama said she signed on to the project because of the script. "I was blessed to read this script at a moment where the producers were meeting with directors and it just knocked me out. It was just so original, so imaginative", she stated. "That's what it is about this script and the world is that it feels like a ] gone psycho and I think that's what most fairy tales actually started as."<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca">{{cite web|first=Sheila|last=Roberts|title=Megan Fox, Diablo Cody Interview, Jennifers Body|publisher=MoviesOnline|year=2009|access-date=September 26, 2009|url=http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_17327.html|archive-date=September 5, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090905163024/http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_17327.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, Cody, Reitman and Kusama knew the film would be ] because of the language.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>


{{quote_box|width=35%|align=right|quote=I remember cracking open my father's laser disk of '']'' and having the coolest movie moments of my childhood and I can't imagine having that experience with any other genre. I can't imagine dangerously opening a broad comedy in the middle of the night hoping I wouldn't get caught. I have an idea there's a kid out there who will be secretly opening up a ] of ''Jennifer's Body'' and I think it's pretty exciting to all of us.|source=—Jason Reitman<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>}}
=== Development ===
''Jennifer's Body'' is the follow-up to writer and producer Diablo Cody's and Jason Reitman's collaboration efforts on ''].'' In October 2007, ] pre-emptively purchased the rights to Cody's script with Megan Fox to star. Peter Rice, who at the time oversaw ] and Fox Atomic, brought in the project as Fox Searchlight had previously distributed Cody's film ''Juno''.<ref name="Cody Body">{{cite news|last= Kit|first= Borys|last2= Simmons| first2= Leslie| title= Atomic has Cody 'Body,' Fox part|publisher= ]| date=2007-10-23| url= http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb| accessdate= 2008-02-11}} {{Dead link|date=October 2010|bot=H3llBot}} {{Subscription}}</ref> Mason Novick and Reitman's producing parter Dan Dubiecki signed as producers in November 2007 with plans to produce the film under Hard C, which is housed at Fox Searchlight. Reitman commented, "We want to make unusual films, and anything that turns a genre on its ear interests Dan and I."<ref name=www.hollywoodreporter.com/> ] was announced as director in January 2008.<ref>{{cite news | last= Fleming| first= Michael| title= Kusama to direct Cody's 'Body'| work= ]| date= 2008-01-07| url= http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117978567.html | accessdate= 2008-02-11}}</ref> Kusama said she signed on to the project because of the script. "I was blessed to read this script at a moment where the producers were meeting with directors and it just knocked me out. It was just so original, so imaginative", she stated. "That's what it is about this script and the world is that it feels like a ] gone psycho and I think that's what most fairy tales actually started as."<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca">{{cite web|first=Sheila|last=Roberts|title=Megan Fox, Diablo Cody Interview, Jennifers Body|publisher=MoviesOnline|year=2009|accessdate=2009-09-26|url=http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_17327.html}}</ref> Additionally, Cody, Reitman and Kusama knew the film would be ] because of the language.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>{{Quote_box|width=35%|align=right|quote="I remember cracking open my father's laser disk of '']'' and having the coolest movie moments of my childhood and I can't imagine having that experience with any other genre. I can't imagine dangerously opening a broad comedy in the middle of the night hoping I wouldn't get caught. I have an idea there's a kid out there who will be secretly opening up a ] of ''Jennifer's Body'' and I think it's pretty exciting to all of us."|source=—Jason Reitman<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>}}


In February 2008, a cease and desist was given to a writer at CC2K.us after they posted an advance script review for the film.<ref>{{cite news|title= Fox Searchlight Lawyer's Defend Jennifer's Body from Snarky Bloggers| publisher= mediabistro.com|date=2008-02-11| url= http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/so_sue_me/fox_searchlight_lawyers_defend_jennifers_body_from_snarky_bloggers_77164.asp?c=rss| accessdate= 2008-02-11}}</ref> The Latino Review also posted an advance review.<ref>{{cite news| last= Chavez| first= Kellvin| title= Exclusive: Jennifer's Body Story Details| publisher= Latinoreview.com| date=2008-01-08| url= http://www.latinoreview.com/news/exclusive-jennifer-s-body-story-details-3616| accessdate= 2008-02-11}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> At the time CC2K.us received their cease and desist order, questions were raised why Latino Review's largely positive script review was allowed to stay posted while CC2K was being forced by Fox Searchlight to remove their mainly negative coverage.<ref>{{cite news| last= Longworth| first= Karina | authorlink=Karina Longworth | title= Diablo Cody: Above Critique?| publisher= Spout Blog| date= 2008-02-11| url= http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/11/diablo-cody-above-critique/| accessdate= 2008-04-09| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20080319135059/http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/11/diablo-cody-above-critique/ <!--Added by H3llBot-->| archivedate= 2008-03-19}}</ref> Although Latino Review was later asked to remove their review, numerous other websites and blogs published their own critiques of the script.<ref>{{cite news| last= Frazier| first= Adam| title= Jennifer's Body| publisher= Counting Down The Hours| date= 2007-12-15| url= http://afrazier.blogspot.com/2007/12/jennifers-body.html| accessdate= 2008-04-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| last= Drees| first= Rich| title= ''Jennifer's Body'' Script Review| publisher= FilmBuffOnLine| date= 2008-03-14| url= http://www.filmbuffonline.com/ReadingRoom/JennifersBodyScriptReview.htm| accessdate= 2008-04-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title= Review- Diablo Cody's "Body"| publisher= Mystery Man On Film| date=2008-03-05| url= http://mysterymanonfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/review-diablo-codys-body.html| accessdate= 2008-04-09}}</ref> In February 2008, a cease and desist was given to a writer at CC2K.us after they posted an advance script review for the film.<ref>{{cite news| title= Fox Searchlight Lawyer's Defend Jennifer's Body from Snarky Bloggers| publisher= mediabistro.com| date= February 11, 2008| url= http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/so_sue_me/fox_searchlight_lawyers_defend_jennifers_body_from_snarky_bloggers_77164.asp?c=rss| access-date= February 11, 2008| url-status= dead| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090629220425/http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/so_sue_me/fox_searchlight_lawyers_defend_jennifers_body_from_snarky_bloggers_77164.asp?c=rss| archive-date= June 29, 2009| df= mdy-all}}</ref> The Latino Review also posted an advance review.<ref>{{cite news|last=Chavez |first=Kellvin |title=Exclusive: Jennifer's Body Story Details |publisher=Latinoreview.com |date=January 8, 2008 |url=http://www.latinoreview.com/news/exclusive-jennifer-s-body-story-details-3616 |access-date=February 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080119163114/http://www.latinoreview.com/news/exclusive-jennifer-s-body-story-details-3616 |archive-date=January 19, 2008 }}</ref> At the time CC2K.us received their cease and desist order, questions were raised why Latino Review's largely positive script review was allowed to stay posted while CC2K was being forced by Fox Searchlight to remove their mainly negative coverage.<ref>{{cite news| last= Longworth| first= Karina | author-link=Karina Longworth | title= Diablo Cody: Above Critique?| publisher= Spout Blog| date= February 11, 2008| url= http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/11/diablo-cody-above-critique/| access-date= April 9, 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080319135059/http://blog.spout.com/2008/02/11/diablo-cody-above-critique/ <!--Added by H3llBot-->| archive-date= March 19, 2008}}</ref> Although Latino Review was later asked to remove their review, numerous other websites and blogs published their own critiques of the script.<ref>{{cite news| last= Frazier| first= Adam| title= Jennifer's Body| publisher= Counting Down The Hours| date= December 15, 2007| url= http://afrazier.blogspot.com/2007/12/jennifers-body.html| access-date= April 9, 2008| archive-date= July 8, 2011| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110708022047/http://afrazier.blogspot.com/2007/12/jennifers-body.html| url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| last= Drees| first= Rich| title= ''Jennifer's Body'' Script Review| publisher= FilmBuffOnLine| date= March 14, 2008| url= http://www.filmbuffonline.com/ReadingRoom/JennifersBodyScriptReview.htm| access-date= April 9, 2008| url-status= dead| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080519174648/http://www.filmbuffonline.com/ReadingRoom/JennifersBodyScriptReview.htm| archive-date= May 19, 2008| df= mdy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title= Review- Diablo Cody's "Body"| publisher= Mystery Man On Film| date= March 5, 2008| url= http://mysterymanonfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/review-diablo-codys-body.html| access-date= April 9, 2008| archive-date= March 8, 2008| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080308162913/http://mysterymanonfilm.blogspot.com/2008/03/review-diablo-codys-body.html| url-status= live}}</ref>


Cody stated that when writing the script, she was "simultaneously trying to pay tribute to some of the conventions that we've already seen in horror, yet, at the same time, kind of turn them on their ear".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> One of her influences from the 1980s horror genre was the film '']''. She wanted to "honor that, and at the same time, had never really seen this particular subgenre done with girls and tried to do a little of both".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Despite this, she said she had noticed that "the last survivor standing in the typical horror film is a woman" and that because of this she feels "horror has always had kind of a feminist angle to it in a weird way and, at the same time, it's kind of delightfully exploitative". ''Jennifer's Body'' could play on both of these aspects.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Cody stated that when writing the script, she was "simultaneously trying to pay tribute to some of the conventions that we've already seen in horror, yet, at the same time, kind of turn them on their ear".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> One of her influences from the 1980s horror genre was the film '']''. She wanted to "honor that, and at the same time, had never really seen this particular subgenre done with girls and tried to do a little of both".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Despite this, she said she had noticed that "the last survivor standing in the typical horror film is a woman" and that because of this she feels "horror has always had kind of a feminist angle to it in a weird way and, at the same time, it's kind of delightfully exploitative". ''Jennifer's Body'' could play on both of these aspects.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> In terms of other influences, the film has been frequently compared to the 2001 film '']'', though neither ] nor ] have acknowledged it as an influence.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://screenrant.com/jennifers-body-ginger-snaps-movie-comparisons-explained/ | title=Jennifer's Body: Every Similarity to 2000's Ginger Snaps | website=] | date=April 23, 2020 | access-date=March 1, 2024 | archive-date=June 5, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230605025720/https://screenrant.com/jennifers-body-ginger-snaps-movie-comparisons-explained/ | url-status=live }}</ref>


Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends.<ref name=in.reuters.com/> "(Director) Karyn Kusama and I are both outspoken ]", she said. "We wanted to subvert the classic horror model of women being terrorized. I want to write roles that service women. I want to tell stories from a female perspective. I want to create good parts for actresses where they're not just accessories to men."<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Addressing "the male-dominated" horror genre, Cody said "a key reason for writing the film was to bring to the screen a new way of expressing the intensity of female bonds" and that the adolescent female friendships she experienced were unparalleled in their intensity. She wanted to show the "almost horrific" aspect of such devotion and its relation to ].<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends.<ref name=in.reuters.com/> "(Director) Karyn Kusama and I are both outspoken ]", she said. "We wanted to subvert the classic horror model of women being terrorized. I want to write roles that service women. I want to tell stories from a female perspective. I want to create good parts for actresses where they're not just accessories to men."<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Addressing "the male-dominated" horror genre, Cody said "a key reason for writing the film was to bring to the screen a new way of expressing the intensity of female bonds" and that the adolescent female friendships she experienced were unparalleled in their intensity. She wanted to show the "almost horrific" aspect of such devotion and its relation to ].<ref name=in.reuters.com/>


The producers decided to have the film open with the statement "Hell is a teenage girl" to reflect the "horrors" of ] and that "the hellish emotions felt during high school often reappear as teenage girls mature into young women".<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Cody stated: <blockquote>There's the scene where Jennifer's sitting alone smearing makeup on her face. I always thought that was such a sad image. She's so vulnerable. I don't know any woman who hasn't had a moment sitting in front of the mirror and thinking, 'Help me, I want to be somebody else.' What makes it extra affecting is that is stunning.<ref name=in.reuters.com/></blockquote> The producers decided to have the film open with the statement "Hell is a teenage girl" to reflect the "horrors" of ] and that "the hellish emotions felt during high school often reappear as teenage girls mature into young women".<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Cody stated:


<blockquote>There's the scene where Jennifer's sitting alone smearing makeup on her face. I always thought that was such a sad image. She's so vulnerable. I don't know any woman who hasn't had a moment sitting in front of the mirror and thinking, 'Help me, I want to be somebody else.' What makes it extra affecting is that is stunning.<ref name=in.reuters.com/></blockquote>
Cody crafted the story to follow a night that ends in a tragic fire, after which Jennifer is kidnapped and set up as a sacrifice which goes awry. Jennifer, now possessed by a demon and subsequently altered into a ], sets out on a bloody rampage in which she devours boys, and it is up to Needy to stop her. In sort of a reversal ], Jennifer must consume the blood of others once a month or she becomes weak and plain-looking.<ref name="www.msnbc.msn.com">{{cite web|first=Alonso|last=Duralde|title=‘Jennifer's Body' fails at horror and comedy. For all its pedigree, teen fright flick winds up a mess.|publisher=]|date=2009-09-17|accessdate=2009-09-24|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32903289/ns/entertainment-movies/}}</ref> "It's a ] sort of thing. I think it's always really satisfying and cathartic to see a character that was previously bullied become super human", said Cody.<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Cody said the script is not a reflection of any part of her own life, but that she is more like character Needy. "I would say I was more of a Needy than a Jennifer. I was never an ], and I've never gotten off with bullying other people", she said. "If I had to choose, I was definitely the one being shoved, not the one shoving."<ref name=in.reuters.com/>


Cody crafted the story to follow a night that ends in a tragic fire, after which Jennifer is kidnapped and set up as a sacrifice which goes awry. Jennifer, now possessed by a demon and subsequently altered into a ], sets out on a bloody rampage in which she devours boys, and it is up to Needy to stop her. In sort of a reversal ], Jennifer must consume the blood of others once a month or she becomes weak and plain-looking.<ref name="www.msnbc.msn.com">{{cite web|first=Alonso|last=Duralde|title='Jennifer's Body' fails at horror and comedy. For all its pedigree, teen fright flick winds up a mess.|publisher=]|date=September 17, 2009|access-date=September 24, 2009|url=https://www.today.com/popculture/jennifer-s-body-fails-horror-comedy-wbna32903289|archive-date=November 27, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171127223749/https://www.today.com/popculture/jennifer-s-body-fails-horror-comedy-wbna32903289|url-status=live}}</ref> "It's a ] sort of thing. I think it's always really satisfying and cathartic to see a character that was previously bullied become super human", said Cody.<ref name=in.reuters.com/> Cody said the script is not a reflection of any part of her own life, but that she is more like character Needy. "I would say I was more of a Needy than a Jennifer. I was never an ], and I've never gotten off with bullying other people", she said. "If I had to choose, I was definitely the one being shoved, not the one shoving."<ref name=in.reuters.com/>
The nickname "Needy" was given to Seyfried's character to underline the essentially condescending dynamic in Jennifer and Needy's high school relationship,<ref name="sfweekly.com">{{cite web|first=Nick|last=Pinkerton|title=Jennifer's Body|publisher=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-24|url=http://www.sfweekly.com/movies/jennifers-body-1279788/}}</ref> as Needy often admires Jennifer and feels she needs her. Cody said "Jennifer is a product of a culture that pressures girls to be skinny, beautiful and just like movie stars" and that she "hopes the film inspires girls to take life into their own hands and do with it, what they want".<ref name=in.reuters.com/> "If I had gone to this movie as a teenage girl, I would've come out of it feeling totally inspired", she stated. "I would've wanted to write, I would've wanted to create and I would've felt like I watched something that was speaking to me."<ref name=in.reuters.com/>

The nickname "Needy" was given to Seyfried's character to underline the essentially condescending dynamic in Jennifer and Needy's high school relationship,<ref name="sfweekly.com">{{cite web|first=Nick|last=Pinkerton|title=Jennifer's Body|publisher=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 24, 2009|url=http://www.sfweekly.com/movies/jennifers-body-1279788/|archive-date=September 23, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090923152006/http://www.sfweekly.com/movies/jennifers-body-1279788|url-status=dead}}</ref> as Needy often admires Jennifer and feels she needs her. Cody said "Jennifer is a product of a culture that pressures girls to be skinny, beautiful and just like movie stars" and that she "hopes the film inspires girls to take life into their own hands and do with it, what they want".<ref name=in.reuters.com/> "If I had gone to this movie as a teenage girl, I would've come out of it feeling totally inspired", she stated. "I would've wanted to write, I would've wanted to create and I would've felt like I watched something that was speaking to me."<ref name=in.reuters.com/>


Assigned to direct the film, Kusama said, "I think also a lot of horror is about femaleness – whether it's '']'' or '']''."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> She said she feels "like there's a lot of fear of the female or kind of celebration of it in some weird way and something about this movie managed to take the fear and the sense that it's the female that ultimately survives and sort of marry that in a really interesting way".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Assigned to direct the film, Kusama said, "I think also a lot of horror is about femaleness – whether it's '']'' or '']''."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> She said she feels "like there's a lot of fear of the female or kind of celebration of it in some weird way and something about this movie managed to take the fear and the sense that it's the female that ultimately survives and sort of marry that in a really interesting way".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>
Line 86: Line 119:
<blockquote>Obviously we knew people were going to totally sensationalize it. They're beautiful girls, the scene is hot—I'm not afraid to say that. There is a sexual energy between the girls which is kind of authentic, because I know when I was a teen-aged girl, the friendships that I had with other girls were almost romantic, they were so intense. I wanted to sleep at my friend's house every night, I wanted to wear her clothes, we would talk on the phone until our ears ached. I wanted to capture that heightened feeling you get as an adolescent that you don't really feel as a grownup. (laughs) You like friends when you're a grownup, but you don't need to sleep in the same bed with them and talk to them on the phone until 5 a.m. every night.<ref name=www.afterellen.com/></blockquote> <blockquote>Obviously we knew people were going to totally sensationalize it. They're beautiful girls, the scene is hot—I'm not afraid to say that. There is a sexual energy between the girls which is kind of authentic, because I know when I was a teen-aged girl, the friendships that I had with other girls were almost romantic, they were so intense. I wanted to sleep at my friend's house every night, I wanted to wear her clothes, we would talk on the phone until our ears ached. I wanted to capture that heightened feeling you get as an adolescent that you don't really feel as a grownup. (laughs) You like friends when you're a grownup, but you don't need to sleep in the same bed with them and talk to them on the phone until 5 a.m. every night.<ref name=www.afterellen.com/></blockquote>


Though the film is part comedy, Cody initially intended for it to be a "very dark, very brooding" traditional slasher film. Close to "a third of the way into the process" she felt that she was incapable of doing so because "the humor just kept sneaking in". She stated, "I have a macabre sense of humor. A lot of the things in the movie that are horrifying are funny to me." Feeling that "comedy films and horror films are kind of similar" due to being films where you can significantly gauge intense reactions from the audience, Cody stated, "They're laughing, they're screaming, it's not a passive experience. So, I actually think comedy and horror are kind of similar in that way."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Though the film is part comedy, Cody initially intended for it to be a "very dark, very brooding" traditional slasher film. Close to "a third of the way into the process" she felt that she was incapable of doing so because "the humor just kept sneaking in". She stated, "I have a macabre sense of humor. A lot of the things in the movie that are horrifying are funny to me." Feeling that "comedy films and horror films are kind of similar" due to being films where you can significantly gauge intense audience reactions, Cody stated, "They're laughing, they're screaming, it's not a passive experience. So, I actually think comedy and horror are kind of similar in that way."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>

=== Casting ===
Megan Fox was in negotiations to star as Jennifer Check since 2007, and was officially cast in October 2007.<ref>{{cite news | author= Mr. Disgusting | title= Megan Fox to Star in Supernatural-Comedy 'Jennifer's Body' | url= https://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10237 | publisher= ] | date= October 23, 2007 | access-date= February 11, 2008 | url-status= dead | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20081120203404/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10237 | archive-date= November 20, 2008 | df= mdy-all }}</ref> Fox said the reason she agreed to the role was her love for the script. "I think what I loved about the movie is it's so unapologetic and how completely inappropriate it is at all times," she said. "That was my favorite part about the script and about the character. It's fun to be able to say the shit that she got to say and get away with it and how people find it charming."<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> Asked how acting in a film like this is different from acting in '']'', Fox said "there's distractions, like there's no robots to distract you from whatever performance I do give. So, if it's terrible, you're gonna fucking know that it's really terrible".<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> She said despite this aspect of the business being intimidating, she enjoyed portraying the character. "I wasn't really sure what I was doing," said Fox. "I was just trying to have fun with it and I felt like I was able to make fun of my own image as to how some people might perceive Megan Fox to be. I was just sort of flying freely and I hope some of it works."<ref name="www.moviesonline.ca" /> In balancing out the film's horror with humor, she said she relied heavily on ]'s script and ]'s direction to pull it off, stating, "I have a very specific sense of humor, things that I think are funny aren't going to fly with ]. It's going to eliminate some of the audience, so you need someone there to tell you you can't do that."<ref name="shocktillyoudrop.com">{{cite web |first=Ryan |last=Rotten |title=Megan Fox Talks Jennifer's Body FX |publisher=shocktillyoudrop.com |date=July 29, 2009 |access-date=September 26, 2009 |url=http://shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=11239 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090930120030/http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/topnews.php?id=11239 |archive-date=September 30, 2009 |url-status=dead }}</ref>

In February 2008, Amanda Seyfried was cast as Anita "Needy" Lesnicki, the "plain Jane" best friend to Fox's character for whom she harbors a somewhat ] infatuation.<ref name="Seyfried">{{cite news|last1=Kit |first1=Borys |last2=Simmons |first2=Leslie |title=Seyfried in 'Body' cast |work=] |date=February 8, 2008 |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb |access-date=February 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100110213754/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i55bff7bc1a68ecefd1ee67eb5979e4fb |archive-date=January 10, 2010 }} {{Subscription required}}</ref><ref name="www.afterellen.com">{{cite web|first=Jamie|last=Murnane|title=Diablo Cody didn't do the same-sex kiss in "Jennifer's Body" for publicity|publisher=]|date=September 8, 2009|access-date=September 26, 2009|url=http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jamiemurnane/diablo-cody-didnt-do-the-same-sex-kiss-in-jennifer-body-for-publicity|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090912053822/http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jamiemurnane/diablo-cody-didnt-do-the-same-sex-kiss-in-jennifer-body-for-publicity|archive-date=September 12, 2009}}</ref> Seyfried said it was a relief to play the nerdy role opposite Fox. "Being a lead (like Megan), you have that weird pressure of feeling like you have to look attractive," she said. "In this movie, I didn't worry about any of that shit. I don't want to play the one that everybody is supposed to want to have sex with."<ref name="wWw.afterellen.com">{{cite web|first=Jen|last=Sabella|title=Amanda Seyfried rolls her eyes about kissing Megan Fox|publisher=]|date=August 18, 2009|access-date=October 14, 2009|url=http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jensabella/amanda-seyfried-rolls-her-eyes-about-kissing-megan-fox|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821181559/http://www.afterellen.com/blog/jensabella/amanda-seyfried-rolls-her-eyes-about-kissing-megan-fox|archive-date=August 21, 2009}}</ref>

The filmmakers had hoped to cast an actual rock musician to portray Nikolai Wolf, with ] of ] and ] of ] being their top choices. '']'' star ] was also considered for the role.<ref>{{cite news|last=Faraci |first=Devin |title=Jennifer's body is going authentically Emo! |publisher=Chud.com |date=February 5, 2008 |url=http://chud.com/articles/articles/13528/1/JENNIFER039S-BODY-IS-GOING-AUTHENTICALLY-EMO/Page1.html |access-date=February 11, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080208051112/http://chud.com/articles/articles/13528/1/JENNIFER039S-BODY-IS-GOING-AUTHENTICALLY-EMO/Page1.html |archive-date=February 8, 2008 }}</ref> In March 2008, Johnny Simmons was reportedly cast as Nikolai.<ref>{{cite news| last= Perry| first= Byron| title= Johnny Simmons| work= ]| date= March 5, 2008| url= https://variety.com/2008/scene/people-news/johnny-simmons-1117981899/| access-date= January 10, 2014| archive-date= December 3, 2019| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191203015120/https://variety.com/2008/scene/people-news/johnny-simmons-1117981899/| url-status= dead}}</ref> However, Adam Brody was officially cast in the role, while Simmons then accepted the role of Chip Dove. Brody did not perform his own vocals, saying, "My singing voice is still going through puberty. They gave me a singing lesson or two, and it's not the worst thing in the world, but it's not anything anyone would choose to hear."<ref name="popwatch.ew.com">{{cite magazine|first=Mandi|last=Bierly|title='Jennifer's Body' bad boy Adam Brody takes the EW Pop Culture Personality Test|magazine=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 24, 2009|url=http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/09/18/jennifers-body-bad-boy-adam-brody-takes-the-ew-pop-culture-personality-test/|archive-date=October 19, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141019051459/http://popwatch.ew.com/2009/09/18/jennifers-body-bad-boy-adam-brody-takes-the-ew-pop-culture-personality-test/|url-status=live}}</ref> His vocals were provided by Ryan Levine, who also played another member of the band.


=== Design and effects === === Design and effects ===
]'s so that Jennifer can "fully envelop" her victims.<ref name="maximotv">{{cite news|title=Megan Fox on the 'Make-Up Process' for Jennifer's Body at Hot Topic Event|publisher=maximotv|date=2009-09-16|accessdate=2009-09-26}}</ref> Unlike a snake, the character has long, sharp teeth in order to tear the flesh from her victims' bodies as she eats them.]] ]


Handling the film's ]s were KNB EFX GROUP and the ] (MPC). For Jennifer's demonic form, the creators used different techniques. "I actually wasn't in that much because they created an entire head. They did a live cast of me from the shoulders up. They created me and then put the teeth in", stated Fox. "To save my face, they had a photo double that would come in and do most of the crazy monster makeup - they would do that on her. So it would go from me, then in post-production it would somehow go to her and the fake head. They would mix them all together."<ref name=shocktillyoudrop.com/> Handling the film's ]s were KNB EFX GROUP and ] (MPC). For Jennifer's demonic form, the creators used different techniques. "I actually wasn't in that much because they created an entire head. They did a live cast of me from the shoulders up. They created me and then put the teeth in", stated Fox. "To save my face, they had a photo double that would come in and do most of the crazy monster makeup - they would do that on her. So it would go from me, then in post-production it would somehow go to her and the fake head. They would mix them all together."<ref name=shocktillyoudrop.com/>


For the "vomit scene" where Jennifer has just arrived at Needy's house after being murdered and inhabited by a demon, Fox said the liquid she was given to spit out "was actually ...chocolate syrup initially".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> "We did a few takes where I would just do this scream and sort of puke ]'s chocolate syrup. Scratch the Hershey's because I don't want to endorse that or anything", she stated. "And then, special effects did a rig that clamps onto my ear and you revisit it in the pool scene..." Fox said it "clips on. It goes around the back of my ear and then I bite down on it on the side of my face, like this, and it projectiles. It's a tube..."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> For the "vomit scene" where Jennifer has just arrived at Needy's house after being murdered and inhabited by a demon, Fox said the liquid she was given to spit out "was actually ... chocolate syrup initially".<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> "We did a few takes where I would just do this scream and sort of puke ]'s chocolate syrup. Scratch the Hershey's because I don't want to endorse that or anything", she stated. "And then, special effects did a rig that clamps onto my ear and you revisit it in the pool scene ..." Fox said it "clips on. It goes around the back of my ear and then I bite down on it on the side of my face, like this, and it projectiles. It's a tube ..."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>


Directing the scene, Kusama said it had a classic feel. Fox agreed, "Yeah, and it projects whatever that material was. I'm not sure. It was pretty intense. I think it was worse for because she's the one that got puked on. I was the one doing the puking."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Director Kusama said it had a classic feel. Fox agreed, "Yeah, and it projects whatever that material was. I'm not sure. It was pretty intense. I think it was worse for because she's the one that got puked on. I was the one doing the puking."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>


For more practical special effects on the set as opposed to ], Kusama said it "was a choice that we all sort of made organically". She said they appreciate "those kind of effects in older movies and sometimes how much more effective it is to use a ton of CG" and that they "always started with a practical effect and then moved forward from there to lay a groundwork of something that's actually physically, materially there". They found this to be more enjoyable.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> For more practical special effects on the set as opposed to ], Kusama said it "was a choice that we all sort of made organically". She said they appreciate "those kind of effects in older movies and sometimes how much more effective it is to use a ton of CG" and that they "always started with a practical effect and then moved forward from there to lay a groundwork of something that's actually physically, materially there". They found this to be more enjoyable.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>
{{Quote_box|width=35%|align=left|quote="Before we started shooting, it involved the full appliance attached to face and then her real jaw would be ] essentially inside of her mouth and then the appliance would drop below her real jaw and then visual effects essentially owned everything in her mouth and everything outside would've been a special effects appliance. And then there would've been a lot of clean up as well because of the way it attached to her face."|source=—Erik Nordby on the construction of Jennifer's demonic mouth and jaw<ref name=www.awn.com/>}}


{{quote_box|width=35%|align=left|quote=Before we started shooting, it involved the full appliance attached to face and then her real jaw would be ] essentially inside of her mouth and then the appliance would drop below her real jaw and then visual effects essentially owned everything in her mouth and everything outside would've been a special effects appliance. And then there would've been a lot of clean up as well because of the way it attached to her face.|source=—Erik Nordby on the construction of Jennifer's demonic mouth and jaw<ref name=www.awn.com/>}}
Erik Nordby of KNB (known for his work on '']'', which also features co-star ]) stated, "We immediately went into pitch mode in January and spent a solid two weeks trying to not only bid the script but also collect as much reference material and stuff for the first client get together."<ref name="www.awn.com">{{cite web|first=Bill|last=Desowitz|title=Jennifer's Body: Jaw Dropping VFX|publisher=]|date=2009-09-22|accessdate=2009-09-27|url=http://www.awn.com/articles/feature/ijennifers-bodyi-jaw-dropping-vfx}}</ref> He said the director and producers wanted an "old-school, hands-off, lo-fi approach to the visual effects" so that the horror elements would not overpower the storyline.<ref name=www.awn.com/> Based on the script, MPC similarly came to the same conclusion and "provided a clear direction" for Nordby and his team. "At that point when we met with them, they had already met with KNB, who had already done up a stylized still of what, at the time, they were calling 'Evil Jennifer,'" he said. "There was a lot of info yet to come, but based on the script, Jennifer goes from very beautiful Megan Fox to a very ghoulish, succubus creature whose jaw distends half-way down her face." Nordby said the look was eventually toned down at the wishes of MPC. From there, KNB "produced some tests, grabbing a bunch of stills from and work to indicate how that balance could exist between special effects and visual effects and still maintain a level of subtlety" and that " responded really well".<ref name=www.awn.com/>

Erik Nordby of KNB (known for his work on '']'', which also features co-star ]) stated, "We immediately went into pitch mode in January and spent a solid two weeks trying to not only bid the script but also collect as much reference material and stuff for the first client get together."<ref name="www.awn.com">{{cite web|first=Bill|last=Desowitz|title=Jennifer's Body: Jaw Dropping VFX|publisher=]|date=September 22, 2009|access-date=September 27, 2009|url=http://www.awn.com/articles/feature/ijennifers-bodyi-jaw-dropping-vfx|archive-date=September 26, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090926082848/http://www.awn.com/articles/feature/ijennifers-bodyi-jaw-dropping-vfx|url-status=live}}</ref> He said the director and producers wanted an "old-school, hands-off, lo-fi approach to the visual effects" so that the horror elements would not overpower the storyline.<ref name=www.awn.com/> Based on the script, MPC similarly came to the same conclusion and "provided a clear direction" for Nordby and his team. "At that point when we met with them, they had already met with KNB, who had already done up a stylized still of what, at the time, they were calling 'Evil Jennifer,'" he said. "There was a lot of info yet to come, but based on the script, Jennifer goes from very beautiful Megan Fox to a very ghoulish, succubus creature whose jaw distends half-way down her face." Nordby said the look was eventually toned down at the wishes of MPC. From there, KNB "produced some tests, grabbing a bunch of stills from and work to indicate how that balance could exist between special effects and visual effects and still maintain a level of subtlety" and that " responded really well".<ref name=www.awn.com/>


The teams wanted to "maintain some sort of the Megan Fox allure" but said that it was "incredibly difficult because as soon as warped her face in any direction, the shine kind of came off it". To combat this, they ended up focusing on anything below her nose, where they had the freedom to make things "as horrific as needed to" and then above her nose, " could manipulate it somewhat with warps and color correction in her eye sockets. So even at her worst, she had some of that sexiness throughout".<ref name=www.awn.com/> The teams wanted to "maintain some sort of the Megan Fox allure" but said that it was "incredibly difficult because as soon as warped her face in any direction, the shine kind of came off it". To combat this, they ended up focusing on anything below her nose, where they had the freedom to make things "as horrific as needed to" and then above her nose, " could manipulate it somewhat with warps and color correction in her eye sockets. So even at her worst, she had some of that sexiness throughout".<ref name=www.awn.com/>


Nordby said most of the attention was devoted to Jennifer's face and that "very quickly in combination" with special effects and makeup, MPC thought up a five-station system for what Jennifer goes through. Nordby stated:<blockquote>Stage one is beautiful Jennifer and then two and three were strictly makeup where her eyes become more recessed and she would start to look plain like the rest of us. And stage four was some custom ] that KNB made for her, and then visual effects in stage four was mainly facial warping and recessing her eyes some more and having a pinning effect to her ] and a variety of other musculature deforms, just bringing her cheek bones down more. And stage five was the full on, as crazy as it gets, which you don't really see until near the end.<ref name=www.awn.com/></blockquote> Nordby said most of the attention was devoted to Jennifer's face and that "very quickly in combination" with special effects and makeup, MPC thought up a five-station system for what Jennifer goes through. Nordby stated:
<blockquote>Stage one is beautiful Jennifer and then two and three were strictly makeup where her eyes become more recessed and she would start to look plain like the rest of us. And stage four was some custom ] that KNB made for her, and then visual effects in stage four was mainly facial warping and recessing her eyes some more and having a pinning effect to her ] and a variety of other musculature deforms, just bringing her cheek bones down more. And stage five was the full on, as crazy as it gets, which you don't really see until near the end.<ref name=www.awn.com/></blockquote>


During testing, Nordby and the special effects teams realized that getting Fox in and out of the appliance used to create Jennifer's murderous jaw would be too time-consuming. To remedy this, they hired a photo double. "very day (for about 10 days) she would sit in a chair with this full appliance on her and we would shoot this jaw, and then all would have to do is the dentures", stated Nordby. He said that "when it came time to shoot any of these jaw moments, would act out in rehearsal how she was going to attack her victim and fine tune that blocking so it was relatively locked".<ref name="www.awn.com" /> The camera accompanied them in the same way, as "it would roll and she would put her dentures in, and they would really distort her face" in a way that would produce a satisfying and nice side effect. Additionally, the team would have Fox wear ]es and go through exactly the same motions as normal Jennifer. "But then I would shoot all the key poses that existed in whatever moves the digital double was doing, so that we had as much of that appliance in that lighting condition that we could get", said Nordby. "KNB also created a hairless but high detailed head of the stage five Jennifer that had an articulating jaw."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> During testing, Nordby and the special effects teams realized that getting Fox in and out of the appliance used to create Jennifer's murderous jaw would be too time-consuming. To remedy this, they hired a photo double. "very day (for about 10 days) she would sit in a chair with this full appliance on her and we would shoot this jaw, and then all would have to do is the dentures", stated Nordby. He said that "when it came time to shoot any of these jaw moments, would act out in rehearsal how she was going to attack her victim and fine tune that blocking so it was relatively locked".<ref name="www.awn.com" /> The camera accompanied them in the same way, as "it would roll and she would put her dentures in, and they would really distort her face" in a way that would produce a satisfying and nice side effect. Additionally, the team would have Fox wear ]es and go through exactly the same motions as normal Jennifer. "But then I would shoot all the key poses that existed in whatever moves the digital double was doing, so that we had as much of that appliance in that lighting condition that we could get", said Nordby. "KNB also created a hairless but high detailed head of the stage five Jennifer that had an articulating jaw."<ref name="www.awn.com" />
] ]


Nordby spent a significant amount of time shooting "the articulating jaw" scene because they had "ultimate control over how the light was hitting the head". He said, "This so-called jaw shot became a pivotal point, because for four months of the post, the filmmakers thought the film was getting too scary so MPC pulled back on the jaw and then they thought it wasn't scary enough."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> Because of this, "they pushed back and this jaw went back and forth quite a bit to help navigate where they wanted the tone on any given day". These different poses helped the two teams perfect the jaw scenes. "From a marketing point of view, from all the test screenings they did", said Norby, "there was a lot of work figuring out how to make this a scary film as well as a funny film."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> Since the team was on a small budget, they "relied more on skilled artists to think through shots rather than a brute force approach".<ref name="www.awn.com" /> Nordby spent a significant amount of time shooting "the articulating jaw" scene because they had "ultimate control over how the light was hitting the head". He said, "This so-called jaw shot became a pivotal point, because for four months of the post, the filmmakers thought the film was getting too scary so MPC pulled back on the jaw and then they thought it wasn't scary enough."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> Because of this, "they pushed back and this jaw went back and forth quite a bit to help navigate where they wanted the tone on any given day". These different poses helped the two teams perfect the jaw scenes. "From a marketing point of view, from all the test screenings they did", said Nordby, "there was a lot of work figuring out how to make this a scary film as well as a funny film."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> Since the team was on a small budget, they "relied more on skilled artists to think through shots rather than a brute force approach".<ref name="www.awn.com" />


MPC additionally worked on the disappearing waterfall that serves as Jennifer's grave when she is killed at the beginning of the film. They transformed the mysterious waterfall into a whirlpool. "We came up with an approach that we thought would work because we had a lot of confidence in our water sims", stated Nordby. "The waterfall appears both as a day and night shot, so we had to integrate with the water. And the night shots play a pivotal role in the film, and we do a huge crane over."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> They could not lock it to a ] or to a ] and filming the shots was difficult due to the actual base of the waterfall being out of reach. Nordby said, "I eventually lowered down a shot—a ton of reference of the area because I knew we'd have to do some digi-matte work to recreate the basin that the whirlpool ends up in." They soon realized that there was an insufficient amount of churning and foam to read as real as the location. The CG Supervisor, Pete Dionne, presented a different idea. "He grabbed chunks of that river and tialing it so that it had a nice stretch of birds' eye point of view of the water that existed on the location in the lighting situation we were trying to match", stated Nordby. "And then he projected that onto a whirlpool of animated ] and had similar enough texture to the actual water that existed there, but pulled control into lighting it and could add depth mainly to the center of it." Dealing with "very shallow" water, the team had to take extra care when filming the scenes.<ref name="www.awn.com" /> MPC additionally worked on the disappearing waterfall that serves as Jennifer's grave when she is killed at the beginning of the film. They transformed the mysterious waterfall into a whirlpool. "We came up with an approach that we thought would work because we had a lot of confidence in our water sims", stated Nordby. "The waterfall appears both as a day and night shot, so we had to integrate with the water. And the night shots play a pivotal role in the film, and we do a huge crane over."<ref name="www.awn.com" /> They could not lock it to a ] or to a ] and filming the shots was difficult due to the actual base of the waterfall being out of reach. Nordby said, "I eventually lowered down a shot—a ton of reference of the area because I knew we'd have to do some digi-matte work to recreate the basin that the whirlpool ends up in." They soon realized that there was an insufficient amount of churning and foam to read as real as the location. The CG Supervisor, Pete Dionne, presented a different idea. "He grabbed chunks of that river and tialing it so that it had a nice stretch of birds' eye point of view of the water that existed on the location in the lighting situation we were trying to match", stated Nordby. "And then he projected that onto a whirlpool of animated ] and had similar enough texture to the actual water that existed there, but pulled control into lighting it and could add depth mainly to the center of it." Dealing with "very shallow" water, the team had to take extra care when filming the scenes.<ref name="www.awn.com" />
Line 116: Line 159:


=== Filming === === Filming ===
In late 2007, Fox Atomic had plans to film ''Jennifer's Body'' before a possible writer's strike. When the ] began, shooting was then moved to March 7, 2008, in ], ], specifically at Robert Burnaby Park near Cariboo Hill Secondary School. Some of the scenes, particularly those situated in a school setting, were filmed in local ]-area schools such as ], ] and ]. In late 2007, Fox Atomic had plans to film ''Jennifer's Body'' before a possible writer's strike. When the ] began, shooting was then moved to March 7, 2008, in ], British Columbia, specifically at Robert Burnaby Park near Cariboo Hill Secondary School. Some of the scenes, particularly those situated in a school setting, were filmed in local ]-area schools such as ], ] and ]. The waterfalls scene was filmed at Cascade Falls in Cascade Falls Regional Park in British Columbia.


Fox said that while filming her highly anticipated kissing scene with Seyfried that Seyfried was "extremely uncomfortable" but that she herself was not. "I feel much safer with girls, so I felt more comfortable kissing than kissing any of the other people that I had to kiss", she said.<ref name="moviesblog.mtv.com">{{cite web | first = Adam | last = Rosenberg | title = Megan Fox Talks About Her 'Jennifer's Body' Kiss With Amanda Seyfried |publisher= MTV|date= 2009-08-31 |accessdate= 2009-09-26 |url= http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/08/31/megan-fox-talks-about-her-jennifers-body-kiss-with-amanda-seyfried/ }}</ref> Seyfried's uneasiness in the scene caused "giggling fits" between takes.<ref name=moviesblog.mtv.com/> Seyfried said that neither of them wanted to do the kiss because they felt it was just for promotional purposes.<ref name=wWw.afterellen.com/> She agreed with Fox that she was uneasy about acting out the scene. "It was my first time doing a real kissing scene with a woman", she stated. "It is just weird. It is a woman. With a woman's smell—soft and floraly—and maybe the ]s are different. Something about it felt uncomfortable for me."<ref name="www.digitalspy.com">{{cite web|first=Catriona|last=Wightman|title=Seyfried: 'Kissing Megan Fox was weird'|publisher=]|date=2009-10-04|accessdate=2009-10-14|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a180342/seyfried-kissing-megan-fox-was-weird.html}}</ref> Fox said that while filming her highly anticipated kissing scene with Seyfried that Seyfried was "extremely uncomfortable" but that she herself was not. "I feel much safer with girls, so I felt more comfortable kissing than kissing any of the other people that I had to kiss", she said.<ref name="moviesblog.mtv.com">{{cite web | first = Adam | last = Rosenberg | title = Megan Fox Talks About Her 'Jennifer's Body' Kiss With Amanda Seyfried | publisher = MTV | date = August 31, 2009 | access-date = September 26, 2009 | url = http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/08/31/megan-fox-talks-about-her-jennifers-body-kiss-with-amanda-seyfried/ | archive-date = October 1, 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20091001222354/http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/08/31/megan-fox-talks-about-her-jennifers-body-kiss-with-amanda-seyfried | url-status = dead }}</ref> Seyfried's uneasiness in the scene caused "giggling fits" between takes.<ref name=moviesblog.mtv.com/> Seyfried said that neither of them wanted to do the kiss because they felt it was just for promotional purposes.<ref name=wWw.afterellen.com/> She agreed with Fox that she was uneasy about acting out the scene. "It was my first time doing a real kissing scene with a woman", she stated. "It is just weird. It is a woman. With a woman's smell—soft and floraly—and maybe the ]s are different. Something about it felt uncomfortable for me."<ref name="www.digitalspy.com">{{cite web|first=Catriona|last=Wightman|title=Seyfried: 'Kissing Megan Fox was weird'|publisher=]|date=October 4, 2009|access-date=October 14, 2009|url=http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a180342/seyfried-kissing-megan-fox-was-weird.html|archive-date=October 7, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091007235518/http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a180342/seyfried-kissing-megan-fox-was-weird.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Music === === Music ===
Music was incorporated as an essential part of the film; there are "very specific bands" placed in band posters in some parts, such as in the selection of the band poster on the walls of the bar.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Kusama said "he music was a huge component of the movie" and this is first evident with "the songs that we see and hear performed, but then, just the vibe of the movie actually". She said, "As the movie progresses, it becomes a pretty clearly music-oriented movie. It's sort of a youth movie. Some of those bands were totally made up and some of them are not."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Music was incorporated as an essential part of the film; there are "very specific bands" placed in band posters in some parts, such as in the selection of the band poster on the walls of the bar.<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/> Kusama said "he music was a huge component of the movie" and this is first evident with "the songs that we see and hear performed, but then, just the vibe of the movie actually". She said, "As the movie progresses, it becomes a pretty clearly music-oriented movie. It's sort of a youth movie. Some of those bands were totally made up and some of them are not."<ref name=www.moviesonline.ca/>


== Reception == == Release ==


=== Critical response === === Critical response ===
{{Anchor|Critics|Reviews}} {{Anchor|Critics|Reviews}}
The film received mixed reviews from critics. Review aggregation website ] reports 42% of critics gave the film positive write-ups based on 173 reviews, with a rating ] of 5.1/10.<ref name="www.rottentomatoes.com" /> The site's consensus of opinion is that "''Jennifer's Body'' features occasionally clever dialogue but the horror/comic premise fails to be either funny or scary enough to satisfy".<ref name="www.rottentomatoes.com" /> At ], which assigns a ] rating out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film holds a mixed/average score of 47 based on 29 reviews.<ref name="Metacritic">{{cite web | url = http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/jennifersbody| title = Jennifer's Body | publisher = ] | work = ]|date =2009-09-17}}</ref>
Audiences polled by ] gave the film a C- grade, on a scale of A to F.<ref>{{cite web | title = Prospects for 'Cloudy' future mixed as 'Informant,' 'Love Happens,' 'Jennifer's Body' disappoint | date = September 20, 2009 | author = Ben Fritz | url = http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/09/prospects-for-cloudy-future-mixed-as-informant-love-happens-jennifers-body-disappoint.html }}</ref>


====Contemporary====
Film critic ] enjoyed the film, dubbing it a "'']'' for boys" and saying "as a movie about a flesh-eating cheerleader, it's better than it has to be". Ebert said that within Cody there is "the soul of an artist, and her screenplay brings to this material a certain edge, a kind of gleeful relish, that's uncompromising. This isn't your assembly-line teen horror thriller". Additionally, he complimented Fox as " through" in her portrayal and "play the role straight". He gave the film three out of four stars.<ref name="rogerebert.suntimes.com">{{cite web |first= Roger |last= Ebert | authorlink = Roger Ebert |title= Jennifer's Body (R) |publisher= ]|date= 2009-09-18 |accessdate= 2009-09-19 |url= http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090916/REVIEWS/909169996 }}</ref> Rick Groen of '']'' gave the film three out of four stars.<ref name="toronto-globe">{{cite web | title = Hot high-school horror, with bite | work = The Globe and Mail (Toronto) | date = Sep 17, 2009 | author = Rick Groen http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/jennifers-body/article1345536/}}</ref> ] of '']'' stated it is "Hot! Hot! Hot!" and that "Director Karyn Kusama is torn between duty to female empowerment and slasher convention".<ref name="www.rollingstone.com">{{cite web|first=Peter| last=Travers|title=Jennifer's Body |publisher= Rolling Stone |date= 2009-09-18|accessdate= 2009-09-19|url= http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/29190858/review/30165951/jennifers_body}}</ref> He credited Fox's portrayal as showing "a comic flair" that '']'' "never investigated".<ref name="www.rollingstone.com" /> Tom Charity of ] said " last time a horror flick tried for a distinctly female point of view the result was ''Twilight'', which was more of a wan gothic romance than a chiller" and "Fox makes a convincing vixen, callously picking up victims whenever her luster begins to fade. It's not hard to imagine she can have anyone who takes her fancy". Charity credited the dialogue as "bitingly smart, funny teen-speak ...along with sharp pop culture references".<ref name="www.cnn.com">{{cite news |date= 2009-09-18 |first= Tom |last= Charity |title= 'Jennifer's Body' is a winner |publisher= CNN |accessdate= 2009-09-24 |url= http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/movies/09/18/review.jennifers.body/index.html |archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20091003075651/http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/18/review.jennifers.body/index.html <!--Added by H3llBot--> | archivedate = 2009-10-03}}</ref>
The ] website ] reports that 46% of critics gave the film positive reviews, based on 212 reviews, and an average rating of 5.20/10. The website's critical consensus states, "''Jennifer's Body'' features occasionally clever dialogue but the horror/comic premise fails to be either funny or scary enough to satisfy."<ref name="www.rottentomatoes.com" /> At ], which assigns a weighted average rating to reviews from mainstream critics, the film holds a score of 47 out of 100 based on 29 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".<ref name="Metacritic">{{cite web| url = https://www.metacritic.com/movie/jennifers-body| title = Jennifer's Body Reviews| publisher = ]| work = ]| date = September 17, 2009| access-date = April 20, 2020| archive-date = October 17, 2018| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181017014705/https://www.metacritic.com/movie/jennifers-body| url-status = live}}</ref> Audiences polled by ] gave the film an average grade of "C−" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{cite web | title = Prospects for 'Cloudy' future mixed as 'Informant,' 'Love Happens,' 'Jennifer's Body' disappoint | date = September 20, 2009 | author = Ben Fritz | url = http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/09/prospects-for-cloudy-future-mixed-as-informant-love-happens-jennifers-body-disappoint.html | access-date = January 10, 2014 | archive-date = January 24, 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140124025835/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/09/prospects-for-cloudy-future-mixed-as-informant-love-happens-jennifers-body-disappoint.html | url-status = live }}</ref>


Film critic ] enjoyed the film, dubbing it a "'']'' for boys" and saying "as a movie about a flesh-eating cheerleader, it's better than it has to be." Ebert said that within Cody there is "the soul of an artist, and her screenplay brings to this material a certain edge, a kind of gleeful relish, that's uncompromising. This isn't your assembly-line teen horror thriller". Additionally, he complimented Fox as " through" in her portrayal and "play the role straight". He gave the film three out of four stars.<ref name="rogerebert.suntimes.com">{{cite web |first= Roger |last= Ebert |author-link= Roger Ebert |title= Jennifer's Body (R) |publisher= ] |date= September 18, 2009 |access-date= September 19, 2009 |url= https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/jennifers-body-2009 |archive-date= June 7, 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190607030103/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/jennifers-body-2009 |url-status= live }}</ref> Rick Groen of '']'' gave the film three out of four stars.<ref name="toronto-globe">{{cite news | title = Hot high-school horror, with bite | work = The Globe and Mail (Toronto) | date = September 17, 2009 | author = Rick Groen | url = https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/jennifers-body/article1345536/ | access-date = September 1, 2017 | archive-date = November 29, 2017 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171129235748/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/jennifers-body/article1345536/ | url-status = live }}</ref> ] of '']'' stated it is "Hot! Hot! Hot!" and that "Director Karyn Kusama is torn between duty to ] and slasher convention".<ref name="www.rollingstone.com">{{cite web|first=Peter| last=Travers|title=Jennifer's Body |publisher= Rolling Stone |date= September 18, 2009|access-date= September 19, 2009|url= https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/29190858/review/30165951/jennifers_body|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090922170915/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/29190858/review/30165951/jennifers_body|url-status= dead|archive-date= September 22, 2009}}</ref> He credited Fox's portrayal as showing "a comic flair" that '']'' "never investigated".<ref name="www.rollingstone.com" /> Tom Charity of ] said " last time a horror flick tried for a distinctly female point of view the result was ''Twilight'', which was more of a wan gothic romance than a chiller" and "Fox makes a convincing vixen, callously picking up victims whenever her luster begins to fade. It's not hard to imagine she can have anyone who takes her fancy". Charity credited the dialogue as "bitingly smart, funny teen-speak ... along with sharp pop culture references".<ref name="www.cnn.com">{{cite news |date= September 18, 2009 |first= Tom |last= Charity |title= 'Jennifer's Body' is a winner |publisher= CNN |access-date= September 24, 2009 |url= http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/movies/09/18/review.jennifers.body/index.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091003075651/http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/18/review.jennifers.body/index.html <!--Added by H3llBot--> | archive-date = October 3, 2009}}</ref>
Mary Pols of '']'' magazine called the film entertaining and reasoned "here is a lot of intelligent camp here, and some sharply observed characterizations" and Cody and Kusama's "depiction of the ways in which women like Needy are willing to compromise themselves to indulge an ultimately less secure friend is spot-on".<ref name="www.time.com">{{cite news|first=Mary|last=Pols|title=Jennifer's Body: Megan Fox Is a Man Eater|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-28|url=http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1924473,00.html}}</ref> Dana Stevens of '']'' praised the film for being "luscious and powerful, sexy and scary, maddening at times, but impossible to stop watching" and a "wicked black comedy with unexpected emotional resonance, one of the most purely pleasurable movies of the year so far".<ref name=www.slate.com/> '']'' Karen Durbin said the film not only puts "a fresh spin on female-centric pop genres but also own them outright" and is "rich with first-rate performances".<ref name="www.elle.com">{{cite web |first= Karen |last= Durbin |title= Whip It, Jennifer's Body |work= ] |date=2009-09-18 |accessdate= 2009-09-24 |url= http://www.elle.com/Entertainment/Movies-TV/Movie-Releases-Whip-It-Jennifer-s-Body}}</ref>


Mary Pols of '']'' magazine called the film entertaining and reasoned "here is a lot of intelligent ] here, and some sharply observed characterizations" and Cody and Kusama's "depiction of the ways in which women like Needy are willing to compromise themselves to indulge an ultimately less secure friend is spot-on".<ref name="www.time.com">{{cite magazine|first=Mary|last=Pols|title=Jennifer's Body: Megan Fox Is a Man Eater|magazine=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 28, 2009|url=http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1924473,00.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090922170028/http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1924473,00.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 22, 2009}}</ref> Dana Stevens of '']'' praised the film for being "luscious and powerful, sexy and scary, maddening at times, but impossible to stop watching" and a "wicked black comedy with unexpected emotional resonance, one of the most purely pleasurable movies of the year so far".<ref name=www.slate.com/> '']''{{'}}s Karen Durbin said the film not only puts "a fresh spin on female-centric pop genres but also own them outright" and is "rich with first-rate performances".<ref name="www.elle.com">{{cite web |first= Karen |last= Durbin |title= Whip It, Jennifer's Body |work= ] |date= September 18, 2009 |access-date= September 24, 2009 |url= http://www.elle.com/Entertainment/Movies-TV/Movie-Releases-Whip-It-Jennifer-s-Body |archive-url= https://archive.today/20110809030727/http://www.elle.com/Entertainment/Movies-TV/Movie-Releases-Whip-It-Jennifer-s-Body |url-status= dead |archive-date= August 9, 2011 }}</ref>
'']''{{'s}} Rene Rodriguez likened the film's " of the genre as a metaphor for ] angst, female sexuality and the strange, sometimes corrosive bonds between girls who claim to be best friends" to ]'s 1976 film '']''.<ref name="www.miamiherald.com">{{cite web|first=Rene|last=Rodriguez |title=Jennifer's Body (R) **½: Flirting with greatness, bedeviled by timidity|publisher=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-19|url=http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/movies/reviews/story/1237654.html}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> She applauded the film for being fearless when delving into the subject of ] and for reversing the tradition/idea that only "bad girls have sex when they're 16 good ones—those who, like Needy, do their homework and are responsible—never slide past first base".<ref name=www.miamiherald.com/> Nick Pinkerton of '']'' called Fox and Seyfried's ] kissing scene "the best close-up girl-girl liplock" since '']'',<ref name=sfweekly.com/> and ] of '']'' concluded "the movie deserves—and is likely to win—a devoted cult following, despite its flaws" and " are mitigated by a sensibility that mixes playful pop-culture ingenuity with a healthy shot of feminist anger".<ref name=movies.nytimes.com/>


The '']''{{'s}} Rene Rodriguez likened the film's " of the genre as a metaphor for adolescent angst, female sexuality and the strange, sometimes corrosive bonds between girls who claim to be best friends" to ]'s 1976 film '']''.<ref name="www.miamiherald.com">{{cite web|first=Rene|last=Rodriguez |title=Jennifer's Body (R) **½: Flirting with greatness, bedeviled by timidity|publisher=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 19, 2009|url=http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/movies/reviews/story/1237654.html}} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> Rodriguez applauded the film for being fearless when delving into the subject of ] and for reversing the notion that only "bad girls have sex when they're 16 good ones—those who, like Needy, do their homework and are responsible—never slide past first base".<ref name=www.miamiherald.com/> Nick Pinkerton of '']'' called Fox and Seyfried's kissing scene "the best close-up girl-girl liplock" since '']'' (1999),<ref name=sfweekly.com/> and ] of '']'' concluded "the movie deserves—and is likely to win—a devoted cult following, despite its flaws" and that " are mitigated by a sensibility that mixes playful pop-culture ingenuity with a healthy shot of feminist anger".<ref name=movies.nytimes.com/>
Giving a partially negative review of the film was Joshua Rothkopf of '']'', who said the "movie has a centerfold sheen to it—and some lesbianic soft-core flirtation to match—as its plot dives deeply into ''Twilight''-esque heavy-melo meltdown in the last act" and that "Cody throws one too many losses at Needy; the screenwriter loses her satiric way about halfway through. But for a while, this has real fangs".<ref name="newyork.timeout.com">{{cite web|first=Joshua|last=Rothkopf|title=Jennifer's Body|publisher=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-19|url=http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/film/78622/jennifers-body-film-review#ixzz0Rbakz5HA}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> Ann Hornaday of '']'' said, "There's a certain kooky, kinky fun to be had with ''Jennifer's Body''" but that "dmittedly, this is the stuff of lurid adolescent distraction, not great cinema" and "is strictly a niche item but provides a goofy, campy bookend to '']'' on the ] shelf. Watch it, forget it, move on".<ref name="www.washingtonpost.com">{{cite web|first=Ann|last=Hornaday|title=Jennifer's Body|publisher=The Washington Post|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/jennifers-body,1156228/critic-review.html#reviewNum1}}</ref> '']''{{'s}} Peter Hartlaub stated, "Enjoy the film for its witty dialogue and fun performances, but know that there isn't a single good scare. An episode of '']'' has more thrills."<ref name=www.sfgate.com/> Hartlaub felt the film is not bad, is "almost always pleasing" and that Fox "proves that she has some range" but "the chances that it will be somebody else's pop culture reference 27 years from now are slim to none".<ref name=www.sfgate.com/> Joe Neumaier of '']'' said, "Fox merely needs to look either vacant or evil, which the ''Transformers'' boy-toy does spookily well" but "ords and story are still the lifeblood of a movie, and ''Jennifer's Body'' is filled like a Twinkie with half-fleshed-out ideas".<ref name="www.nydailynews.com">{{cite web|first=Joe|last=Neumaier|title='Jennifer's Body': Megan Fox zombie horror satire needs more fleshing out|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2009/09/17/2009-09-17_jennifers_body_megan_fox_zombie_horror_satire_needs_more_fleshing_out.html
}}</ref> Disagreeing with Fox's performance, '']'s'' Michael Phillips called Fox "a pretty bad actress" who "doesn't seem to get Cody's sense of humor. At all".<ref name="chicagotribune.com">{{cite web|first= Michael|last=Phillips|title='Jennifer's Body' ★★. How bad do you want it?|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-24|url=http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-tc-mov-jennifers-body-0916-0sep18,0,5023457.column}}</ref> He reasoned the "movie's partially redeemed by Seyfried, who makes her character more than a repository for audience sympathy" and "her make-out scene with Fox is handled with more suspense and care than anything else in the movie".<ref name=chicagotribune.com/>


Giving a partially negative review of the film was Joshua Rothkopf of '']'', who said the "movie has a centerfold sheen to it—and some lesbianic soft-core flirtation to match—as its plot dives deeply into ''Twilight''-esque heavy-melo meltdown in the last act" and that "Cody throws one too many losses at Needy; the screenwriter loses her satiric way about halfway through. But for a while, this has real fangs".<ref name="newyork.timeout.com">{{cite web|first=Joshua |last=Rothkopf |title=Jennifer's Body |publisher=] |date=September 18, 2009 |access-date=September 19, 2009 |url=http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/film/78622/jennifers-body-film-review#ixzz0Rbakz5HA |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090923011200/http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/film/78622/jennifers-body-film-review |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 23, 2009 }}</ref> Ann Hornaday of '']'' said, "There's a certain kooky, kinky fun to be had with ''Jennifer's Body''" but that "dmittedly, this is the stuff of lurid adolescent distraction, not great cinema" and "is strictly a niche item but provides a goofy, campy bookend to '']'' (2009) on the ] shelf. Watch it, forget it, move on".<ref name="www.washingtonpost.com">{{cite news|first=Ann|last=Hornaday|title=Jennifer's Body|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/jennifers-body,1156228/critic-review.html#reviewNum1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110131942/http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/jennifers-body,1156228/critic-review.html#reviewNum1|url-status=dead|archive-date=November 10, 2012}}</ref> '']''{{'s}} Peter Hartlaub stated, "Enjoy the film for its witty dialogue and fun performances, but know that there isn't a single good scare. An episode of '']'' has more thrills."<ref name=www.sfgate.com/> Hartlaub felt the film is not bad, is "almost always pleasing" and that Fox "proves that she has some range" but "the chances that it will be somebody else's pop culture reference 27 years from now are slim to none".<ref name=www.sfgate.com/> Joe Neumaier of '']'' said, "Fox merely needs to look either vacant or evil, which the ''Transformers'' boy-toy does spookily well" but "ords and story are still the lifeblood of a movie, and ''Jennifer's Body'' is filled like a ] with half-fleshed-out ideas".<ref name="www.nydailynews.com">{{cite web|first=Joe|last=Neumaier|title='Jennifer's Body': Megan Fox zombie horror satire needs more fleshing out|work=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2009/09/17/2009-09-17_jennifers_body_megan_fox_zombie_horror_satire_needs_more_fleshing_out.html|archive-date=September 22, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090922185650/http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2009/09/17/2009-09-17_jennifers_body_megan_fox_zombie_horror_satire_needs_more_fleshing_out.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> Disagreeing with Fox's performance, '']'s'' Michael Phillips called Fox "a pretty bad actress" who "doesn't seem to get Cody's sense of humor. At all".<ref name="chicagotribune.com">{{cite web|first=Michael|last=Phillips|title='Jennifer's Body' ★★. How bad do you want it?|work=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 24, 2009|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-tc-mov-jennifers-body-0916-0sep18,0,5023457.column|archive-date=September 28, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090928235659/http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-tc-mov-jennifers-body-0916-0sep18,0,5023457.column|url-status=dead}}</ref> He reasoned the "movie's partially redeemed by Seyfried, who makes her character more than a repository for audience sympathy" and "her make-out scene with Fox is handled with more suspense and care than anything else in the movie".<ref name=chicagotribune.com/>
Michael Sragow of '']'' described the only "perfect aspect" of ''Jennifer's Body'' as being its title. "No one is going to like this movie for its brain", he said.<ref name="www.baltimoresun.com">{{cite web|first= Michael|last=Sragow|title='Jennifer's Body' is dodgy hipster horror film|work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/movies/bal-jennifers-body-review,0,4558176.story}}</ref> Claudia Puig of '']'' stated of the film, "''Jennifer's Body'' is not as hot as you hope it would be".<ref name="www.usatoday.com">{{cite web|first=Claudia|last=Puig|title='Jennifer's Body': Kind of hot, but a little flabby in spots |work=]|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-20|url=http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2009-09-17-jennifers-body_N.htm}}</ref> Where others praised the film's dialogue, ]'s Alonso Duralde called the writing lazy and "orse still, all of Cody's trademark pop-culture–infused dialogue stands out as artificial and precious".<ref name=www.msnbc.msn.com/> ''Jennifer's Body'', he said, wants "so badly" to be a '']''-esque dark comedy, "but its shortcomings makes you appreciate why that earlier film was so great".<ref name=www.msnbc.msn.com/> ] of '']'' also said the film wants to be like ''Heathers'', and reminded him "a lot" of ''Heathers'' but the only scene in the film that "actually feels dangerous" is when the possessed Jennifer initiates a long and passionate kiss with Needy, which the film "very, very nervously backs away from" and that "''Jennifer's Body'' falls into the dispiriting category of dumb movies made by smart people, in this case a glibly clever writer and a talented director who think a few wisecracks are enough to subvert the teen horror genre".<ref name="www.boston.com">{{cite web|first=Ty|last=Burr|title=Jennifer' Body Fox can't heat up ‘Body'|publisher=The Boston Globe|date=2009-09-18|accessdate=2009-09-25|url=http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2009/09/18/fox_cant_heat_up_body/}}</ref>


Michael Sragow of '']'' described the only "perfect aspect" of ''Jennifer's Body'' as being its title. "No one is going to like this movie for its brain", he said.<ref name="www.baltimoresun.com">{{cite web|first=Michael|last=Sragow|title='Jennifer's Body' is dodgy hipster horror film|work=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/movies/bal-jennifers-body-review,0,4558176.story}}{{Dead link|date=April 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Claudia Puig of '']'' stated of the film, "''Jennifer's Body'' is not as hot as you hope it would be".<ref name="www.usatoday.com">{{cite web|first=Claudia|last=Puig|title='Jennifer's Body': Kind of hot, but a little flabby in spots|work=]|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 20, 2009|url=https://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2009-09-17-jennifers-body_N.htm|archive-date=September 22, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090922201719/http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2009-09-17-jennifers-body_N.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Where others praised the film's dialogue, ]'s Alonso Duralde called the writing lazy and "orse still, all of Cody's trademark pop-culture–infused dialogue stands out as artificial and precious".<ref name=www.msnbc.msn.com/> ''Jennifer's Body'', he said, wants "so badly" to be a '']''-esque dark comedy, "but its shortcomings makes you appreciate why that earlier film was so great".<ref name=www.msnbc.msn.com/> ] of '']'' also said the film wants to be like ''Heathers'', and reminded him "a lot" of ''Heathers'' but the only scene in the film that "actually feels dangerous" is when the possessed Jennifer initiates a long and passionate kiss with Needy, which the film "very, very nervously backs away from" and that "''Jennifer's Body'' falls into the dispiriting category of dumb movies made by smart people, in this case a glibly clever writer and a talented director who think a few wisecracks are enough to subvert the teen horror genre".<ref name="www.boston.com">{{cite news|first=Ty|last=Burr|title=Jennifer' Body Fox can't heat up 'Body'|newspaper=Boston.com|publisher=The Boston Globe|date=September 18, 2009|access-date=September 25, 2009|url=https://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2009/09/18/fox_cant_heat_up_body/|archive-date=September 24, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090924062625/http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2009/09/18/fox_cant_heat_up_body/|url-status=live}}</ref>
=== Box office ===
Though the film was expected to pull in a significant number of the late teenage/] audience, particularly males aged 17 and older, while Cody hoped for a large female turnout,<ref name=in.reuters.com/> it earned a "disappointing" $2.8&nbsp;million on its opening Friday and $6.8&nbsp;million its opening weekend at the North American ]; the film placed #5, while ] animated film ''] ''placed #1 with $30.1&nbsp;million.<ref name=theboxofficejunkie.com/><ref name="hollywoodreporter.com">{{cite web | url = http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i0d52172227325f28c4c19ec7af9c3317 | title = 'Cloudy' wins weekend boxoffice | publisher = ] | date = September 20, 2009 }}</ref><ref name="lexib.net">{{cite web |author= LexiB |title= Jennifer's Body D.O.A in Weekend Box Office |publisher= LexiB |date= 2009-09-21 |accessdate= 2009-09-25 |url= http://lexib.net/2009/09/jennifer%e2%80%99s-body-doa-in-weekend-box-office/ }}</ref> Produced for $16&nbsp;million, ''Jennifer's Body'' did manage to attract the sizable female audience Cody wanted; 51% were female, with 70% of patrons under age 25.<ref name=hollywoodreporter.com/> The film had been expected to benefit somewhat from its heavily marketed lesbian kissing scene between Fox and Seyfried, which, in addition to Fox being in the film, was thought to entice and successfully attract male viewers.<ref name=wWw.afterellen.com/><ref name=movies.ign.com/> Critic Jim Vejvoda at IGN stated that such a scene is not as shocking as it was in past decades and cannot be expected to significantly pull in an audience.<ref name="movies.ign.com">{{cite web | author = Jim Vejvoda | date = September 17, 2009 | url = http://movies.ign.com/articles/101/1019379p1.html| title = Jennifer's Body Review. Jennifer's Body Review. Megan Fox's new movie isn't scary, funny or hot enough. | publisher =IGN |accessdate= 2014-01-04}}</ref> The film grossed $16,204,793 domestically and $15,351,268 in international sales, for a worldwide total of $31,556,061.<ref name="mojo" />


====Retrospective====
Box-office analysts and critics debated the film's underperformance. Analyst Jeff Bock, of Exhibitor Relations, reasoned the film underperformed at the box office due to two reasons; the first, he said, is the genre. Bock stated that Americans get horror and comedy, but with the idea "of those two things together in one place, people suddenly get very dumb".<ref name="www.eonline.com">{{cite web|first=Leslie|last=Gornstein|title=Did Jennifer's Body Bomb Because of Megan Fox?|publisher=]|date=2009-09-21|accessdate=2009-09-21|url= http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/ask_the_answer_bitch/b145273_did_jennifers_body_bomb_because_of.html }}</ref> "The horror-comedy genre is the toughest sell in Hollywood", he said. He noted films '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and ], and said that while many of those are considered critical and business successes, "none of them have brought in the megabucks that a simple horror or comedy can."<ref name=www.eonline.com/> In addition, he labeled the '']'' franchise as more "straight-up horror" than comedy and stated '']''{{'}}s box office performance would determine the horror-comedy genre's current viability.<ref name=www.eonline.com/>
In 2018, Constance Grady reported in '']'' that a new critical consensus was forming that appreciated the film as a "forgotten feminist classic".<ref name="Vox 31 October 2018">{{cite news |last1=Grady |first1=Constance |date=October 31, 2018 |title=How Jennifer's Body went from a flop in 2009 to a feminist cult classic today |work=Vox |url=https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/31/18037996/jennifers-body-flop-cult-classic-feminist-horror |access-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-date=November 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181101024122/https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/31/18037996/jennifers-body-flop-cult-classic-feminist-horror |url-status=live }}</ref> She stated that after the ] highlighted routine ] and ] in the media industry, the film's story of "a group of powerful men sacrificing a girl's body on the altar of their own professional advancement" became "uncomfortably familiar". This, according to Grady, allowed viewers to see the film, rather than as a sex fantasy, as a revenge fantasy as Jennifer uses her abused body against her attackers.<ref name="Vox 31 October 2018" />


According to the screenwriter, Diablo Cody, the film was marketed "all wrong". She had argued with executives who wanted "to market this to boys who like Megan Fox. That's who's going to see it. And I was like. No! This is a movie for girls too! That audience, they did not attempt to reach."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vox.com/i-think-youre-interesting/2018/11/10/18080168/jennifers-body-diablo-cody-interview-reborn|title=The life, death, and rebirth of Jennifer's Body, according to screenwriter Diablo Cody|last=VanDerWerff|first=Emily Todd|date=November 10, 2018|website=Vox|access-date=August 6, 2019|archive-date=May 3, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190503044743/https://www.vox.com/i-think-youre-interesting/2018/11/10/18080168/jennifers-body-diablo-cody-interview-reborn|url-status=live}}</ref>
Despite other R-rated horror films having centered around teenagers, some such as ''Scream'' having been successful, Bock said the second reason ''Jennifer's Body'' underperformed at the box office is the R-rating, which he described as a "killer" for the film. He said the film is set in high school and "sounds like the perfect package for teens" but that "the R rating banned many teens from the theaters" and the studio was left with "an R-rated film marketed to whom, exactly?"<ref name=www.eonline.com/> Nicole Sperling of '']'' felt that it was a slow and disappointing weekend for the box office in general; 3D animated film ''Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs'' was steep competition, and with low box office performances by the ] film '']'' and ] film '']'', she concluded that this may support "the current hypothesis floating around Hollywood, that movie stars no longer matter" and that it takes more than a name to open a film.<ref name="hollywoodinsider.ew.com">{{cite web|first=Nicole|last=Sperling|title=Box Office: 'Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs' soars; 'Jennifer's Body' sinks|work=]|date=2009-09-21|accessdate=2009-09-22|url= http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/09/box-office-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs-soars-jennifers-body-sinks/ }} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> S.T. VanAirsdale of '']'' echoed Sperling's sentiment about the weekend, as "some of the stinkiest high-profile openings in recent memory".<ref name="www.movieline.com">{{cite web|first=S.T.|last=VanAirsdale|title=So What Went Wrong with Jennifer's Body?|publisher=]|date=2009-09-21|accessdate=2009-09-28|url= http://www.movieline.com/200909/so-what-went-wrong-with-jennifers-body.php }} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> He concluded five reasons for ''Jennifer's Body''{{'}}s underperformance at the box office. The first, he said, is the distributor. "]'s genre wing, ], had ''Jennifer's Body'' in the can by the time the mother ship shut it down last spring", he said. "Instead of offloading the film to ], which nimbly maneuvered Diablo Cody's previous brainchild ''Juno'' to awards-season lucre in 2007, a decision was somehow reached to fill a gap in Big Fox's early fall slate with a gory" and "post-feminist horror romp starring Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried". VanAirsdale classified this as a "ig mistake" and that "ou'd have to go back to '']'' to find an example of a Fox release that worked without a genuine male lead; you’d probably have to go back to '']'' to find a genre example of such that they pulled off successfully."<ref name=www.movieline.com/> He named the second reason as the marketing, stating that the film was not well-marketed (whether by billboards, transit posters, lobby standees, or other promotional venues), even in New York.<ref name=www.movieline.com/>
].]]


In a 2022 essay on its status as a classic ] and ] film, ] wrote that ''Jennifer's Body'' speaks to "what it means to experience parallel sexualities with your best friend as you punch through the last vestiges of childhood." Machado rejects accusations that the film is guilty of ], considering it instead an effective depiction of the "central body of water that is bisexuality" which many queer people spend at least some of their life in.<ref>{{cite book |title=It Came From the Closet |pages=21–28 |first=Carmen Maria |last=Machado |chapter=Both Ways |editor-first=Joe |editor-last=Vallese |publisher=The Feminist Press |location=New York City |year=2022 |isbn=9781952177798 |oclc=1325677846}}</ref>
VanAirsdale cited the release date and ] as the third and fourth reasons; he said there was confusion about what day the film was going to debut in theaters, and that ] is "a nation removed from the audience where the film's actual momentum had been accruing for at least a month" and that "this rarely works for early fall releases; not because news doesn’t travel, obviously, but because it peels away a layer of accessibility that accompanies New York and L.A. bows."<ref name=www.movieline.com/> The final reason, he attributed to the critics, believing that the fusion of horror and teen comedy confused some of them. He mentioned ]'s review in particular, and stated that the film could perhaps have used more horror and been funnier, but that the film is "ultimately a movie about two teenage girls' misadventures in victimization" and that "he jokes are virtually incidental to the friction imposed on women who happen to be two sides of the same coin. Who's the monster, and who made the monster? Sorry if you wanted ''Heathers'' with demons, fellas. Equipment's cheap these days; perhaps make your own?"<ref name=www.movieline.com/>


=== Box office ===
Hollywood.com box-office analyst and President Paul Dergarabedian said "the poor numbers don't mean Fox can't open a movie."<ref name="www.usmagazine.com">{{cite web|title=Jennifer Aniston, Megan Fox Bomb at the Box Office|publisher=]|date=2009-09-21|accessdate=2009-09-21|url=http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/jen-aniston-and-megan-fox-2009219}}</ref> "It may be a matter of just choosing the right projects for her", he told the ''].'' "She's trying to find a world beyond ''Transformers'', and she will. She's young and has a lot of promise."<ref name="www.usmagazine.com" />
Though the film was expected to pull in a significant number of the late teenage/] audience, particularly males aged 17 and older, and though Cody hoped for a large female turnout,<ref name=in.reuters.com/> it earned a "disappointing" $2.8&nbsp;million on its opening Friday and $6.8&nbsp;million in its opening weekend at the North American box office; the film placed #5, while ] animated film ''] ''placed #1 with $30.1&nbsp;million.<ref name="theboxofficejunkie.com">{{cite web |date=September 19, 2009 |title=Friday Estimates: Meatballs And Informant Do Well, Jennifer's Body And Love Happens Don't |url=http://blog.theboxofficejunkie.com/2009/09/friday-estimates-meatballs-headed-for.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090926035743/http://blog.theboxofficejunkie.com/2009/09/friday-estimates-meatballs-headed-for.html |archive-date=September 26, 2009 |publisher=The Box Office Junkie }}</ref><ref name="hollywoodreporter.com">{{cite web|url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/cloudy-wins-weekend-boxoffice-89075/|title='Cloudy' wins weekend boxoffice|work=]|date=September 20, 2009|access-date=June 18, 2023|archive-date=June 18, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230618185544/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/cloudy-wins-weekend-boxoffice-89075/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="lexib.net">{{cite web |author= LexiB |title= Jennifer's Body D.O.A in Weekend Box Office |publisher= LexiB |date= September 21, 2009 |access-date= September 25, 2009 |url= http://lexib.net/2009/09/jennifer%e2%80%99s-body-doa-in-weekend-box-office/ |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110515001521/http://lexib.net/2009/09/jennifer%e2%80%99s-body-doa-in-weekend-box-office/ |archive-date= May 15, 2011 |url-status= dead }}</ref> Produced for $16&nbsp;million, ''Jennifer's Body'' did manage to attract the sizable female audience Cody wanted; 51% were female, with 70% of patrons under age 25.<ref name=hollywoodreporter.com/> The film had been expected to benefit somewhat from its heavily marketed lesbian kissing scene between Fox and Seyfried, which, in addition to Fox being in the film, was thought to entice and successfully attract male viewers.<ref name=wWw.afterellen.com/><ref name=movies.ign.com/> Critic Jim Vejvoda at ] stated that such a scene is not as shocking as it was in past decades and cannot be expected to significantly pull in an audience.<ref name="movies.ign.com">{{cite web | author = Jim Vejvoda | date = September 17, 2009 | url = http://movies.ign.com/articles/101/1019379p1.html | title = Jennifer's Body Review. Jennifer's Body Review. Megan Fox's new movie isn't scary, funny or hot enough. | publisher = IGN | access-date = January 4, 2014 | archive-date = January 29, 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120129022137/http://movies.ign.com/articles/101/1019379p1.html | url-status = live }}</ref> The film grossed $16,204,793 domestically and $15,351,268 in international sales, for a worldwide total of $31,556,061.<ref name="mojo">{{cite web |title=JENNIFER'S BODY |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jennifersbody.htm |access-date=October 21, 2009 |publisher=] |archive-date=October 16, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091016072133/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jennifersbody.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>


Box-office analysts and critics debated the film's underperformance. Analyst Jeff Bock, of Exhibitor Relations, reasoned the film underperformed at the box office due to two reasons; the first, he said, is the genre. Bock stated that Americans get horror and comedy, but with the idea "of those two things together in one place, people suddenly get very dumb".<ref name="www.eonline.com">{{cite web|first=Leslie|last=Gornstein|title=Did Jennifer's Body Bomb Because of Megan Fox?|publisher=]|date=September 21, 2009|access-date=September 21, 2009|url=http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/ask_the_answer_bitch/b145273_did_jennifers_body_bomb_because_of.html|archive-date=September 24, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090924232748/http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/ask_the_answer_bitch/b145273_did_jennifers_body_bomb_because_of.html|url-status=live}}</ref> "The horror-comedy genre is the toughest sell in ]", he said. He noted films '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and the '']'' series, and said that while many of those are considered critical and business successes, "none of them have brought in the megabucks that a simple horror or comedy can."<ref name=www.eonline.com/> In addition, he labeled the ] as more "straight-up horror" than comedy and stated '']''{{'}}s box office performance would determine the horror-comedy genre's current viability.<ref name=www.eonline.com/>
== Soundtrack ==
{{Anchor|Soundtrack|Music|Score}}
{{Infobox album|
| Name = Jennifer's Body
| Type = Soundtrack
| Artist = Various artists
| Cover = Jennifer's Body CD Soundtrack.jpg
| Released = {{Start date|2009|8|25}}
| Genre = ], ]
| Length =
| Label = ]
| Producer = ], ], Ed Butler, Dave Cooley, JD Cronise, Max Dingel, Andy Ernest, ], ], ], ], Randall Poster, ], Kevin Weaver, Josh Wilbur, ]<ref>{{cite web|url={{Allmusic|class=album|id=r1626383|pure_url=yes}}|work=Allmusic|title=allmusic: Jennifer's Body: Credits|accessdate=November 14, 2009}}</ref>
}}
{{Album ratings
|rev1 = ]
|rev1score = {{Rating|3|5}}<ref name="Allmusic" />
|rev2 = ]
|rev2score = (unfavorable)<ref name="bbcMusic" />
}}
The film's soundtrack was released by ] on August 25, 2009, and featured previously released music by various ] and ] bands such as ], ], ] and ].<ref name="amg" />
It also features pop punk band ] and ] singer ].
In addition, the album features new songs from ] artists such as ] and ] and ]'s singer ].<ref name="amg" />
The first single from the soundtrack is "]" by ].


Despite other R-rated horror films having centered around teenagers, some such as '']'' having been successful, Bock said the second reason ''Jennifer's Body'' under-performed at the box office is the R-rating, which he described as a "killer" for the film. He said the film is set in high school and "sounds like the perfect package for teens" but that "the R rating banned many teens from the theaters" and the studio was left with "an R-rated film marketed to whom, exactly?"<ref name=www.eonline.com/> Nicole Sperling of '']'' felt that it was a slow and disappointing weekend for the box office in general; 3D animated film ''Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs'' was steep competition, and with low box office performances by the ] film '']'' and ] film '']'', she concluded that this may support "the current hypothesis floating around Hollywood, that movie stars no longer matter" and that it takes more than a name to open a film.<ref name="hollywoodinsider.ew.com">{{cite magazine|first=Nicole|last=Sperling|title=Box Office: 'Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs' soars; 'Jennifer's Body' sinks|magazine=]|date=September 21, 2009|access-date=September 22, 2009|url= http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/09/box-office-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs-soars-jennifers-body-sinks/ |archive-url= https://archive.today/20120902183020/http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/09/box-office-cloudy-with-a-chance-of-meatballs-soars-jennifers-body-sinks/ |url-status= dead |archive-date= September 2, 2012 }}</ref> S.T. VanAirsdale of '']'' echoed Sperling's sentiment about the weekend, as "some of the stinkiest high-profile openings in recent memory".<ref name="www.movieline.com">{{cite web|first=S.T.|last=VanAirsdale|title=So What Went Wrong with Jennifer's Body?|publisher=]|date=September 21, 2009|access-date=September 28, 2009|url= http://www.movieline.com/200909/so-what-went-wrong-with-jennifers-body.php |archive-url= https://archive.today/20130129030300/http://www.movieline.com/200909/so-what-went-wrong-with-jennifers-body.php |url-status= dead |archive-date= January 29, 2013 }}</ref> He concluded five reasons for ''Jennifer's Body''{{'}}s underperformance at the box office. The first, he said, is the distributor. "]'s genre wing, ], had ''Jennifer's Body'' in the can by the time the mother ship shut it down last spring", he said. "Instead of offloading the film to ], which nimbly maneuvered Diablo Cody's previous brainchild ''Juno'' to awards-season lucre in 2007, a decision was somehow reached to fill a gap in Big Fox's early fall slate with a gory" and "] horror romp starring Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried". VanAirsdale classified this as a "ig mistake" and that "ou'd have to go back to '']'' to find an example of a Fox release that worked without a genuine male lead; you'd probably have to go back to '']'' to find a genre example of such that they pulled off successfully."<ref name=www.movieline.com/> He named the second reason as the marketing, stating that the film was not well-marketed (whether by billboards, transit posters, lobby standees, or other promotional venues), even in New York City.<ref name=www.movieline.com/>
The album received a 3 out of 5 review from ], who described the album as having "a slightly different spin, mixing indie with the more expected punk, emo, and metal".<ref name="amg">{{Allmusic|class=album|id=r1626383}} {{retrieved |accessdate=2009-09-19}}</ref> Mike Diver at the ] wrote an unfavorable review of the album, stating that "This assortment of acts says nothing of its parent film, beyond the occasional reference to school days and nods to something nasty coming this way".<ref name="bbcMusic">{{cite web | first = Mike | last = Diver | title = While the film packs bite, its soundtrack is relatively toothless. | url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/reviews/mmnv | work = BBC Music | publisher = BBC | date= November 19, 2009 | accessdate = November 25, 2009 }}</ref>
].]]


VanAirsdale cited the release date and ] as the third and fourth reasons; he said there was confusion about what day the film was going to debut in theaters, and that ] is "a nation removed from the audience where the film's actual momentum had been accruing for at least a month" and that "this rarely works for early fall releases; not because news doesn't travel, obviously, but because it peels away a layer of accessibility that accompanies New York and L.A. bows."<ref name=www.movieline.com/> The final reason, he attributed to the critics, believing that the fusion of horror and teen comedy confused some of them. He mentioned Ty Burr's review in particular, and stated that the film could perhaps have used more horror and been funnier, but that the film is "ultimately a movie about two teenage girls' misadventures in victimization" and that "he jokes are virtually incidental to the friction imposed on women who happen to be two sides of the same coin. Who's the monster, and who made the monster? Sorry if you wanted ''Heathers'' with demons, fellas. Equipment's cheap these days; perhaps make your own?"<ref name=www.movieline.com/>
The ending sequence of the film itself features a song, "]", from the album '']'' by ]. This same album also features a song entitled "Jennifer's Body." In total, the film features 22 songs, most of which are included on the soundtrack.<ref> at </ref>


Hollywood.com box-office analyst and President Paul Dergarabedian said "the poor numbers don't mean Fox can't open a movie."<ref name="www.usmagazine.com">{{cite web|title=Jennifer Aniston, Megan Fox Bomb at the Box Office|publisher=]|date=September 21, 2009|access-date=September 21, 2009|url=http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/jen-aniston-and-megan-fox-2009219|archive-date=September 24, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090924233015/http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/jen-aniston-and-megan-fox-2009219|url-status=live}}</ref> "It may be a matter of just choosing the right projects for her", he told ]''.'' "She's trying to find a world beyond ''Transformers'', and she will. She's young and has a lot of promise."<ref name="www.usmagazine.com" />
{{tracklist
| headline = <ref name="Allmusic">{{cite web | url = {{Allmusic|class=album|id=r1626383|pure_url=yes}} | title = allmusic: Jennifer's Body: Overview | first =Heather | last =Phares | work =Allmovie | accessdate = November 14, 2009
}}</ref>
| extra_column = Original artist
| collapsed = no
| writing_credits = yes
| title1 = ]
| note1 =
| writer1 = Matt Allchin, ]
| extra1 = ]
| length1 = 2:04
| title2 = ]
| note2 =
| writer2 = ], ]
| extra2 = ]
| length2 = 3:47
| title3 = Teenagers
| note3 =
| writer3 = ]
| extra3 = Hayley Williams
| length3 = 2:05
| title4 = ]
| note4 =
| writer4 = Victoria Hesketh, ]
| extra4 = ]
| length4 = 3:16
| title5 = Finishing School
| note5 =
| writer5 = ]
| extra5 = ]
| length5 = 3:25
| title6 = Through the Trees
| note6 =
| writer6 = Andrew Ampaya, Ryan Levine
| extra6 = ]
| length6 = 5:04
| title7 = Time
| note7 =
| writer7 = Cute Is What We Aim For, Feldmann, Shaant
| extra7 = ]
| length7 = 3:57
| title8 = ]
| note8 =
| writer8 = ]
| extra8 = ]
| length8 = 2:17
| title9 = Chew Me Up & Spit Me Out
| note9 =
| writer9 = ], ], ]
| extra9 = ]
| length9 = 3:57
| title10 = Toxic Valentine
| note10 =
| writer10 = Alex Gaskarth, Jimmy Harry, Tony Kanal
| extra10 = ]
| length10 = 2:52
| title11 = ]
| note11 =
| writer11 = ]
| extra11 = Black Kids
| length11 = 3:37
| title12 = ]
| note12 =
| writer12 = Jack Brown, Charles Cave, Harry McVeigh
| extra12 = ]
| length12 = 5:00
| title13 = Celestial Crown
| note13 =
| writer13 = JD Cronise
| extra13 = ]
| length13 = 2:00
| title14 = ]
| note14 =
| writer14 = Brian Aubert, Christopher Guanlao, Joseph Lester, Nicole Monninger
| extra14 = ]
| length14 = 4:59
| title15 = ]
| note15 =
| writer15 = Alexis Benjamin Taylor, Owen Clarke, Al Doyle, Joseph Goddard, Felix Martin
| extra15 = ], ]
| length15 = 4:00
}}


== Home media == === Home media ===
{{Anchor|DVD|Video}} {{Anchor|DVD|Video}}
The film was released on DVD and Blu-ray on December 29, 2009 in the United States and Canada. In Australia, the DVD and Blu-ray was released on May 18, 2010.<ref></ref> The film opened at #11 at the DVD sales chart, making $1.6m in the first week off 104,000 DVD units.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2009/JBODY-DVD.php |title=Jennifer's Body - DVD Sales |publisher=The Numbers |date= |accessdate=2010-04-24}}</ref> There is a rated and an unrated version, with the unrated version running about five minutes longer than the theatrical version. The UK Blu-ray lacks most of the extras found on the locked US release.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1WC |title=Jennifer's Body: Amanda Segfried, Megan Fox: Movies & TV |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |accessdate=2010-04-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1VS |title=Jennifer's Body (+ Digital Copy) [Blu-ray&#93;: Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Jennifer's Body: Movies & TV |publisher=Amazon.com |date= |accessdate=2010-04-24}}</ref> The film was released on DVD and ] on December 29, 2009, in the United States and Canada. In Australia, the DVD and Blu-ray was released on May 18, 2010.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.dreadcentral.com/news/35072/exclusive-behind-scenes-clip-jennifers-body-home-video-release |title=Exclusive Behind-the-Scenes Clip from Jennifer's Body Home Video Release |date=July 2, 2012 |access-date=April 20, 2020 |archive-date=May 19, 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140519222525/http://www.dreadcentral.com/news/35072/exclusive-behind-scenes-clip-jennifers-body-home-video-release |url-status=live }}</ref> The film opened at #11 at the DVD sales chart, making $1.6 million in the first week off 104,000 DVD units.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2009/JBODY-DVD.php |title=Jennifer's Body - DVD Sales |publisher=The Numbers |access-date=April 24, 2010 |archive-date=February 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100217090906/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2009/JBODY-DVD.php |url-status=live }}</ref> There is a rated and an unrated version of the film, with the unrated version running about five minutes longer than the theatrical version. The UK Blu-ray lacks most of the extras found on the locked US release.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1WC |title=Jennifer's Body: Amanda Segfried, Megan Fox: Movies & TV |website=Amazon |date=December 29, 2009 |access-date=April 24, 2010 |archive-date=August 22, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240822072916/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1WC |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1VS |title=Jennifer's Body (+ Digital Copy) [Blu-ray&#93;: Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Jennifer's Body: Movies & TV |website=Amazon |access-date=April 24, 2010 |archive-date=August 22, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240822072917/https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002USF1VS |url-status=live }}</ref>

== Soundtrack ==
{{Main|Jennifer's Body (Music from the Motion Picture)}}
The film's soundtrack was released by ] on August 25, 2009, and featured previously released music by various ] and ] bands such as ], ], ] and ].<ref name="amg" /> It also features pop punk band ] and ] singer ]. In addition, the album features new songs from ] artists such as ] and ] and ]'s lead singer ].<ref name="amg">{{AllMusic|class=album|id=r1626383}} {{retrieved |access-date=September 19, 2009}}</ref> The first single from the soundtrack is "]" by ].

The ending sequence of the film itself features a song, "]", from the album '']'' by ]. This same album also features a song entitled "Jennifer's Body." In total, the film features 22 songs, most of which are included on the soundtrack.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091004214727/http://www.what-song.com/movie/title.php?Title=Jennifer%27s%20Body |date=October 4, 2009 }} at {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141228113303/http://www.what-song.com/ |date=December 28, 2014 }}</ref>


== Graphic novel == <!-- ] redirects here --> == Graphic novel == <!-- ] and ] redirect here -->
As a ] to the film, ] produced a ''Jennifer's Body'' ]. The novel expands on the film's universe and Jennifer's murders of the boys. It was written by Black Metal's ], with the first nine pages illustrated by ] ('']''). Two covers, in Fox's likeness, were designed; one for the direct market by Eric Jones (available only in comic specialty stores), and the other by ] for the mass market focusing more on "hellish Jennifer stories" with art by Mahfood, ]'s Tim Seely, ] Nikki Cook, and Popgun's Ming Doyle. The novel was released in August 2009.<ref name="Shocktillyoudrop.com">{{cite web|first=Ryan|last=Rotten|title=EXCL: First Look at the Jennifer's Body Graphic Novel|publisher=shocktillyoudrop.com|date=2009-07-15|accessdate=2009-09-27|url=http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/comicsnews.php?id=11082}}</ref><ref name="usatoday.com">{{cite web | first=Brent| last=Jones|title='Jennifer's Body' creeps into theaters ... and comics| work=]| date=2009-09-02|accessdate=2009-09-27| url=http://www.usatoday.com/communities/popcandy/post/2009/09/jennifers-body-creeps-into-theaters--and-comics/1}}</ref><ref name="www.atomiccomics.com">{{cite web | title=Radiation Interrogation featuring Jennifer's Body creators Rick Spears, Tim Seeley and Jim Mahfood! | publisher=Atomiccomics.com| date=2009-08-26 |accessdate=2009-09-27| url=http://www.atomiccomics.com/Pages/AtomicBlog/tabid/91/EntryID/561/Default.aspx}} {{Dead link|date=April 2012|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> As a ] to the film, ] produced a ''Jennifer's Body'' graphic novel. The ] expands on the film's universe and Jennifer's murders of the boys. It was written by Black Metal's ], with the first nine pages illustrated by ] ('']''). Two covers, in Fox's likeness, were designed; one for the direct market by Eric Jones (available only in comic specialty stores), and the other by ] for the mass market focusing more on "hellish Jennifer stories" with art by Mahfood, '']''{{'s}} Tim Seely, '']''{{'s}} Nikki Cook, and ''Popgun''{{'s}} Ming Doyle. The novel was released in August 2009.<ref name="Shocktillyoudrop.com">{{cite web|first=Ryan|last=Rotten|title=EXCL: First Look at the Jennifer's Body Graphic Novel|publisher=shocktillyoudrop.com|date=July 15, 2009|access-date=September 27, 2009|url=http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/comicsnews.php?id=11082|archive-date=September 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090918155413/http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/comicsnews.php?id=11082|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="usatoday.com">{{cite web| first=Brent| last=Jones| title='Jennifer's Body' creeps into theaters ... and comics| work=]| date=September 2, 2009| access-date=September 27, 2009| url=https://www.usatoday.com/communities/popcandy/post/2009/09/jennifers-body-creeps-into-theaters--and-comics/1| archive-date=March 4, 2016| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304033003/http://www.usatoday.com/communities/popcandy/post/2009/09/jennifers-body-creeps-into-theaters--and-comics/1| url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="www.atomiccomics.com">{{cite web|title=Radiation Interrogation featuring Jennifer's Body creators Rick Spears, Tim Seeley and Jim Mahfood! |publisher=Atomiccomics.com |date=August 26, 2009 |access-date=September 27, 2009 |url=http://www.atomiccomics.com/Pages/AtomicBlog/tabid/91/EntryID/561/Default.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090828020455/http://www.atomiccomics.com/Pages/AtomicBlog/tabid/91/EntryID/561/Default.aspx |archive-date=August 28, 2009 }}</ref>


The novel features less of Jennifer than the film, but does capture her "going in for the kill" several times. It focuses heavily on following her soon-to-be victims and provides information on their personalities not elaborated on in the film so that readers can better conclude whether the boys deserved to be murdered. The novel consists of four chapters, with a prologue and an epilogue, with art provided for each by different artists. Each one follows a different boy and what is happening in his life just before Jennifer kills him.<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/> The novel features less of Jennifer than the film, but does capture her "going in for the kill" several times. It focuses heavily on following her soon-to-be victims and provides information on their personalities not elaborated on in the film so that readers can better conclude whether the boys deserved to be murdered. The novel consists of four chapters, with a prologue and an epilogue, with art provided for each by different artists. Each one follows a different boy and what is happening in his life just before Jennifer kills him.<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/>


On creating the story, Spears stated, "The best part for me as a writer was to show some events from the movie from a different point of view, sort of like ] for you ] fans. And with comics we can get into the character's heads in a way that works well in comics and novels more so than in film."<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/> He stated, "...I was using the medium to change what we really know about these characters and twist around what we see in the movies. All the academics aside, it's also very funny and gore splattered."<ref name=www.atomiccomics.com/> On creating the story, Spears stated, "The best part for me as a writer was to show some events from the movie from a different point of view, sort of like '']'' for you ] fans. And with comics we can get into the character's heads in a way that works well in comics and novels more so than in film."<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/> He stated, "... I was using the medium to change what we really know about these characters and twist around what we see in the movies. All the academics aside, it's also very funny and gore splattered."<ref name=www.atomiccomics.com/>


Spears stated that while writing the stories, the film was still being made and he had not seen any of it at the time. He mainly learned about the characters through the script. "I got to read the screenplay. It was kinda crazy writing characters that were being changed on set and in the editing process. I had to bob and weave to keep up but that was all part of the fun", he said.<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/> Spears stated that while writing the stories, the film was still being made and he had not seen any of it at the time. He mainly learned about the characters through the script. "I got to read the screenplay. It was kinda crazy writing characters that were being changed on set and in the editing process. I had to bob and weave to keep up but that was all part of the fun", he said.<ref name="www.atomiccomics.com"/>

== Possible sequel ==
In January 2024, screenwriter ] expressed her interest in a possible sequel fifteen years after the first film. She said, "Nothing makes me happier than when a person approaches me and tells me that they love this movie."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bergeson |first=Samantha |date=2024-01-26 |title=Diablo Cody Wants 'Jennifer's Body 2' 15 Years After Being 'Humiliated' by Original's Box Office Bomb |url=https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/diablo-cody-wants-jennifers-body-2-1234948849/ |access-date=2024-07-25 |website=IndieWire |language=en-US |archive-date=August 22, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240822073041/https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/diablo-cody-wants-jennifers-body-2-1234948849/ |url-status=live }}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==
* ], a 2000 film with a similar plot.
* ]—part of the storyline for the film is loosely based on Elyse Pahler's story
* '']'', a 2013 queer horror comedy with a similar plot.
* ]—the nightclub fire in the film was inspired by this real life tragedy
* "]" a 2021 song by ], which contains references to ''Jennifer’s Body'' in the music video.
* ]—A 2000 film with a similar plot
* '']'', a 2024 comedy film written by Diablo Cody that takes place within the same ] as ''Jennifer's Body''.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deadline.com/2024/02/diablo-cody-lisa-frankenstein-jennifers-body-universe-reboot-1235815843/|title=Diablo Cody Says 'Lisa Frankenstein' Takes Place In The Same Universe As 'Jennifer's Body'; Talks Reboot|first1=Armando|last1=Tinoco|first2=Natalie|last2=Sitek|date=February 6, 2024|access-date=February 20, 2024|archive-date=March 2, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240302000614/https://deadline.com/2024/02/diablo-cody-lisa-frankenstein-jennifers-body-universe-reboot-1235815843/|url-status=live}}</ref>
* "]", a 2024 song by ], which contains many references to ''Jennifer's Body'' in the music video.


== References == == References ==
Line 286: Line 236:


== External links == == External links ==
{{wikiquote}} {{Wikiquote}}
{{Commons category}} {{Commons category}}
* {{IMDb title|id=1131734|title=Jennifer's Body}} * {{IMDb title|id=1131734|title=Jennifer's Body}}
* {{AllRovi movie|424575|Jennifer's Body}} * {{TCMDb title|736809|Jennifer's Body}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|id=jennifers_body|title=Jennifer's Body}}
* {{mojo title|id=jennifersbody|title=Jennifer's Body}} * {{mojo title|id=jennifersbody|title=Jennifer's Body}}
* {{rotten-tomatoes|id=jennifers_body|title=Jennifer's Body}}


{{Navboxes
|title=''Jennifer's Body'' related articles
|list1=</span>
{{Karyn Kusama}} {{Karyn Kusama}}
{{Diablo Cody}}
{{Jason Reitman}} {{Jason Reitman}}
{{Diablo Cody}} {{Authority control}}
}}

{{Good Article}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Jennifer's Body}}
]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 23:01, 24 December 2024

2009 film by Karyn Kusama This article is about the 2009 film. For the Hole song, see Jennifer's Body (Hole song). For the Ken Carson song, see Jennifer's Body (Ken Carson song).

Jennifer's Body
Jennifer holding books in her arms sitting on a school desk, wearing a red top and short plaid skirt, in front of a blackboard with the words HELL YES! written in chalk. A hand can be seen trapped by the lid of the school desk. The poster bears the tagline "She's evil ... and not just high school evil" in white block capitals, with the film title underneath in large red block capitals.Theatrical release poster
Directed byKaryn Kusama
Written byDiablo Cody
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyM. David Mullen
Edited byPlummy Tucker
Music by
Production
companies
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release dates
  • September 10, 2009 (2009-09-10) (TIFF)
  • September 18, 2009 (2009-09-18) (United States)
Running time102 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$16 million
Box office$31.6 million

Jennifer's Body is a 2009 American comedy horror film directed by Karyn Kusama and written by Diablo Cody. Starring Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Johnny Simmons, J. K. Simmons, Amy Sedaris, and Adam Brody. The film follows Jennifer Check (Fox), a demonically possessed high school student who kills her male classmates and devours their flesh in order to survive, while her bookworm best friend Anita "Needy" Lesnicki (Seyfried) must find a way to end her killing spree.

Working with Cody again following their collaborative efforts on Juno (2007), Jason Reitman stated he and his producers "want to make unusual films". Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends. As a tie-in to the film, Boom! Studios produced a Jennifer's Body graphic novel, released in August 2009.

Jennifer's Body premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 10, 2009, and was theatrically released in the United States and Canada on September 18, 2009. The film was a commercial failure, grossing $31.6 million against its $16 million production budget, and received mixed reviews from critics, with its dialogue, emotional resonance, and performances of the cast being praised, while the narrative and uneven tone were criticized.

Following revelations that the film's poor marketing campaign was the result of the studio's desire to capitalize on Fox's sex appeal and gear the film towards a younger male audience, Jennifer's Body has undergone a critical reevaluation in the years since its release, and has been described as a feminist cult classic.

Plot

Anita "Needy" Lesnicki, once an insecure and studious teenager living in the small town of Devil's Kettle, Minnesota, is now a violent mental inmate who narrates the story as a flashback while in solitary confinement.

Since childhood, Needy has been best friends with Jennifer Check, a popular and beautiful high school color guard flag spinner, despite the two having little in common. Jennifer often mistreats and dominates Needy, who is too in awe of her to stand up for herself. One night, Jennifer takes Needy to a local dive bar to attend a concert by the indie rock band Low Shoulder. A fire engulfs the bar, killing several people. Jennifer, in shock from the fire, leaves with the band even though Needy tells her not to. Later that evening, she appears in Needy's kitchen, covered in blood, and attempts to eat a rotisserie chicken. She immediately vomits a trail of black fluid and almost bites Needy's neck, but retreats and leaves.

The next morning at school, Jennifer appears fine and dismisses Needy's concerns, appearing apathetic to the fire tragedy. She seduces the school's football captain and lures him into the woods where she disembowels and cannibalizes him. Meanwhile, Low Shoulder gains popularity due to their falsely rumored heroism during the fire, and offer to make a charity appearance at the school's spring formal.

A month later, Jennifer appears sick and listless. She accepts a date with school alternative/emo Colin, whom she invites to an abandoned house; once there she brutally kills and devours him. While Needy and her boyfriend Chip have sex, Needy senses something dreadful has happened and has a disturbing vision of a demonic Jennifer. She flees back home but on the way she is accosted by Jennifer, who is drenched in blood. After making it home unhurt, Needy finds a revitalized and amorous Jennifer in her bed. Jennifer attempts to seduce Needy by kissing her; Needy initially reciprocates but then comes to her senses and demands an explanation.

Jennifer reveals that Low Shoulder had taken her into the woods after the bar fire and offered her as a virgin sacrifice to Satan in exchange for fame and fortune. Although the sacrifice was a success, Jennifer was not actually a virgin, so she became permanently possessed. She became hungry and Ahmet, a foreign exchange student, who was thought to have died in the fire, was her first victim. She had intended to eat Needy as well, but left because she could not bring herself to hurt her best friend. When she has eaten, she can withstand virtually any injury without pain, healing instantly.

Needy goes to the school library's occult section and determines that Jennifer is a succubus who must feed on flesh and can only be killed while she is hungry and weak. Needy tells Chip about Jennifer. He does not believe her, so she breaks up with him in order to protect him. Jennifer intercepts Chip on the way to the school dance and lies to him, saying that Needy had been cheating on him with Colin. She takes him to an abandoned pool and begins feeding on him. Needy arrives and Chip impales Jennifer through the stomach with a pool skimmer. Jennifer escapes and Chip dies.

Angry and heartbroken, Needy breaks into Jennifer's bedroom. The two fight and Jennifer bites Needy's shoulder in the struggle. Needy rips Jennifer's best friend necklace off her neck. Jennifer stops fighting back and Needy stabs her in the heart with a utility knife, killing her and destroying the demon. Jennifer's mother enters and finds Needy on top of her dead daughter's body. Needy is brought to an asylum. She now manifests some of Jennifer's supernatural powers due to the bite. She escapes the mental facility and hitchhikes a ride, telling the driver she is following a band.

A home video and crime scene photos show that the members of Low Shoulder have been murdered in their hotel by Needy.

Cast

Production

Development

Jennifer's Body is the follow-up to writer and producer Diablo Cody and Jason Reitman's collaboration efforts on Juno. In October 2007, Fox Atomic pre-emptively purchased the rights to Cody's script with Megan Fox to star. Peter Rice, who at the time oversaw Fox Searchlight and Fox Atomic, brought in the project as Fox Searchlight had previously distributed Cody's film Juno. Mason Novick and Reitman's producing partner Dan Dubiecki signed as producers in November 2007 with plans to produce the film under Hard C, which is housed at Fox Searchlight. Reitman commented, "We want to make unusual films, and anything that turns a genre on its ear interests Dan and I." Karyn Kusama took over as director in January 2008. Kusama said she signed on to the project because of the script. "I was blessed to read this script at a moment where the producers were meeting with directors and it just knocked me out. It was just so original, so imaginative", she stated. "That's what it is about this script and the world is that it feels like a fairy tale gone psycho and I think that's what most fairy tales actually started as." Additionally, Cody, Reitman and Kusama knew the film would be R rated because of the language.

I remember cracking open my father's laser disk of Nightmare on Elm Street and having the coolest movie moments of my childhood and I can't imagine having that experience with any other genre. I can't imagine dangerously opening a broad comedy in the middle of the night hoping I wouldn't get caught. I have an idea there's a kid out there who will be secretly opening up a Blu-ray of Jennifer's Body and I think it's pretty exciting to all of us.

—Jason Reitman

In February 2008, a cease and desist was given to a writer at CC2K.us after they posted an advance script review for the film. The Latino Review also posted an advance review. At the time CC2K.us received their cease and desist order, questions were raised why Latino Review's largely positive script review was allowed to stay posted while CC2K was being forced by Fox Searchlight to remove their mainly negative coverage. Although Latino Review was later asked to remove their review, numerous other websites and blogs published their own critiques of the script.

Cody stated that when writing the script, she was "simultaneously trying to pay tribute to some of the conventions that we've already seen in horror, yet, at the same time, kind of turn them on their ear". One of her influences from the 1980s horror genre was the film The Lost Boys. She wanted to "honor that, and at the same time, had never really seen this particular subgenre done with girls and tried to do a little of both". Despite this, she said she had noticed that "the last survivor standing in the typical horror film is a woman" and that because of this she feels "horror has always had kind of a feminist angle to it in a weird way and, at the same time, it's kind of delightfully exploitative". Jennifer's Body could play on both of these aspects. In terms of other influences, the film has been frequently compared to the 2001 film Ginger Snaps, though neither Diablo Cody nor Karyn Kusama have acknowledged it as an influence.

Cody said she wanted the film to speak to female empowerment and explore the complex relationships between best friends. "(Director) Karyn Kusama and I are both outspoken feminists", she said. "We wanted to subvert the classic horror model of women being terrorized. I want to write roles that service women. I want to tell stories from a female perspective. I want to create good parts for actresses where they're not just accessories to men." Addressing "the male-dominated" horror genre, Cody said "a key reason for writing the film was to bring to the screen a new way of expressing the intensity of female bonds" and that the adolescent female friendships she experienced were unparalleled in their intensity. She wanted to show the "almost horrific" aspect of such devotion and its relation to parasitism.

The producers decided to have the film open with the statement "Hell is a teenage girl" to reflect the "horrors" of puberty and that "the hellish emotions felt during high school often reappear as teenage girls mature into young women". Cody stated:

There's the scene where Jennifer's sitting alone smearing makeup on her face. I always thought that was such a sad image. She's so vulnerable. I don't know any woman who hasn't had a moment sitting in front of the mirror and thinking, 'Help me, I want to be somebody else.' What makes it extra affecting is that is stunning.

Cody crafted the story to follow a night that ends in a tragic fire, after which Jennifer is kidnapped and set up as a sacrifice which goes awry. Jennifer, now possessed by a demon and subsequently altered into a succubus, sets out on a bloody rampage in which she devours boys, and it is up to Needy to stop her. In sort of a reversal aspect of how puberty changes a girl's life, Jennifer must consume the blood of others once a month or she becomes weak and plain-looking. "It's a meek shall inherit the Earth sort of thing. I think it's always really satisfying and cathartic to see a character that was previously bullied become super human", said Cody. Cody said the script is not a reflection of any part of her own life, but that she is more like character Needy. "I would say I was more of a Needy than a Jennifer. I was never an Alpha female, and I've never gotten off with bullying other people", she said. "If I had to choose, I was definitely the one being shoved, not the one shoving."

The nickname "Needy" was given to Seyfried's character to underline the essentially condescending dynamic in Jennifer and Needy's high school relationship, as Needy often admires Jennifer and feels she needs her. Cody said "Jennifer is a product of a culture that pressures girls to be skinny, beautiful and just like movie stars" and that she "hopes the film inspires girls to take life into their own hands and do with it, what they want". "If I had gone to this movie as a teenage girl, I would've come out of it feeling totally inspired", she stated. "I would've wanted to write, I would've wanted to create and I would've felt like I watched something that was speaking to me."

Assigned to direct the film, Kusama said, "I think also a lot of horror is about femaleness – whether it's Carrie or Rosemary's Baby." She said she feels "like there's a lot of fear of the female or kind of celebration of it in some weird way and something about this movie managed to take the fear and the sense that it's the female that ultimately survives and sort of marry that in a really interesting way".

Addressing her decision to have Jennifer and Needy be romantically intimate at one point during the film, which takes place in the form of a long and passionate kissing scene, Cody said she did not write the scene to score publicity. Speaking of the scene's media hype, she said that "if the two protagonists of the film were a guy and a girl and in a particularly tense moment, they shared a kiss, no one would say it was gratuitous" but "the fact that they're women means it's some kind of stunt". The scene was "intended to be something profound and meaningful" to her and Kusama. She further stated:

Obviously we knew people were going to totally sensationalize it. They're beautiful girls, the scene is hot—I'm not afraid to say that. There is a sexual energy between the girls which is kind of authentic, because I know when I was a teen-aged girl, the friendships that I had with other girls were almost romantic, they were so intense. I wanted to sleep at my friend's house every night, I wanted to wear her clothes, we would talk on the phone until our ears ached. I wanted to capture that heightened feeling you get as an adolescent that you don't really feel as a grownup. (laughs) You like friends when you're a grownup, but you don't need to sleep in the same bed with them and talk to them on the phone until 5 a.m. every night.

Though the film is part comedy, Cody initially intended for it to be a "very dark, very brooding" traditional slasher film. Close to "a third of the way into the process" she felt that she was incapable of doing so because "the humor just kept sneaking in". She stated, "I have a macabre sense of humor. A lot of the things in the movie that are horrifying are funny to me." Feeling that "comedy films and horror films are kind of similar" due to being films where you can significantly gauge intense audience reactions, Cody stated, "They're laughing, they're screaming, it's not a passive experience. So, I actually think comedy and horror are kind of similar in that way."

Casting

Megan Fox was in negotiations to star as Jennifer Check since 2007, and was officially cast in October 2007. Fox said the reason she agreed to the role was her love for the script. "I think what I loved about the movie is it's so unapologetic and how completely inappropriate it is at all times," she said. "That was my favorite part about the script and about the character. It's fun to be able to say the shit that she got to say and get away with it and how people find it charming." Asked how acting in a film like this is different from acting in Transformers, Fox said "there's distractions, like there's no robots to distract you from whatever performance I do give. So, if it's terrible, you're gonna fucking know that it's really terrible". She said despite this aspect of the business being intimidating, she enjoyed portraying the character. "I wasn't really sure what I was doing," said Fox. "I was just trying to have fun with it and I felt like I was able to make fun of my own image as to how some people might perceive Megan Fox to be. I was just sort of flying freely and I hope some of it works." In balancing out the film's horror with humor, she said she relied heavily on Diablo Cody's script and Karyn Kusama's direction to pull it off, stating, "I have a very specific sense of humor, things that I think are funny aren't going to fly with middle America. It's going to eliminate some of the audience, so you need someone there to tell you you can't do that."

In February 2008, Amanda Seyfried was cast as Anita "Needy" Lesnicki, the "plain Jane" best friend to Fox's character for whom she harbors a somewhat homoerotic infatuation. Seyfried said it was a relief to play the nerdy role opposite Fox. "Being a lead (like Megan), you have that weird pressure of feeling like you have to look attractive," she said. "In this movie, I didn't worry about any of that shit. I don't want to play the one that everybody is supposed to want to have sex with."

The filmmakers had hoped to cast an actual rock musician to portray Nikolai Wolf, with Pete Wentz of Fall Out Boy and Joel Madden of Good Charlotte being their top choices. One Tree Hill star Chad Michael Murray was also considered for the role. In March 2008, Johnny Simmons was reportedly cast as Nikolai. However, Adam Brody was officially cast in the role, while Simmons then accepted the role of Chip Dove. Brody did not perform his own vocals, saying, "My singing voice is still going through puberty. They gave me a singing lesson or two, and it's not the worst thing in the world, but it's not anything anyone would choose to hear." His vocals were provided by Ryan Levine, who also played another member of the band.

Design and effects

One of the makeup designs in the film for Jennifer's mouth while the character is in demonic form. Fox explained that the jaw unhinges sort of like a snake's so that Jennifer can "fully envelop" her victims. Unlike a snake, the character has long, sharp teeth in order to tear the flesh from her victims' bodies as she eats them.

Handling the film's special effects were KNB EFX GROUP and Moving Picture Company (MPC). For Jennifer's demonic form, the creators used different techniques. "I actually wasn't in that much because they created an entire head. They did a live cast of me from the shoulders up. They created me and then put the teeth in", stated Fox. "To save my face, they had a photo double that would come in and do most of the crazy monster makeup - they would do that on her. So it would go from me, then in post-production it would somehow go to her and the fake head. They would mix them all together."

For the "vomit scene" where Jennifer has just arrived at Needy's house after being murdered and inhabited by a demon, Fox said the liquid she was given to spit out "was actually ... chocolate syrup initially". "We did a few takes where I would just do this scream and sort of puke Hershey's chocolate syrup. Scratch the Hershey's because I don't want to endorse that or anything", she stated. "And then, special effects did a rig that clamps onto my ear and you revisit it in the pool scene ..." Fox said it "clips on. It goes around the back of my ear and then I bite down on it on the side of my face, like this, and it projectiles. It's a tube ..."

Director Kusama said it had a classic feel. Fox agreed, "Yeah, and it projects whatever that material was. I'm not sure. It was pretty intense. I think it was worse for because she's the one that got puked on. I was the one doing the puking."

For more practical special effects on the set as opposed to CG, Kusama said it "was a choice that we all sort of made organically". She said they appreciate "those kind of effects in older movies and sometimes how much more effective it is to use a ton of CG" and that they "always started with a practical effect and then moved forward from there to lay a groundwork of something that's actually physically, materially there". They found this to be more enjoyable.

Before we started shooting, it involved the full appliance attached to face and then her real jaw would be greened essentially inside of her mouth and then the appliance would drop below her real jaw and then visual effects essentially owned everything in her mouth and everything outside would've been a special effects appliance. And then there would've been a lot of clean up as well because of the way it attached to her face.

—Erik Nordby on the construction of Jennifer's demonic mouth and jaw

Erik Nordby of KNB (known for his work on The Haunting in Connecticut, which also features co-star Kyle Gallner) stated, "We immediately went into pitch mode in January and spent a solid two weeks trying to not only bid the script but also collect as much reference material and stuff for the first client get together." He said the director and producers wanted an "old-school, hands-off, lo-fi approach to the visual effects" so that the horror elements would not overpower the storyline. Based on the script, MPC similarly came to the same conclusion and "provided a clear direction" for Nordby and his team. "At that point when we met with them, they had already met with KNB, who had already done up a stylized still of what, at the time, they were calling 'Evil Jennifer,'" he said. "There was a lot of info yet to come, but based on the script, Jennifer goes from very beautiful Megan Fox to a very ghoulish, succubus creature whose jaw distends half-way down her face." Nordby said the look was eventually toned down at the wishes of MPC. From there, KNB "produced some tests, grabbing a bunch of stills from and work to indicate how that balance could exist between special effects and visual effects and still maintain a level of subtlety" and that " responded really well".

The teams wanted to "maintain some sort of the Megan Fox allure" but said that it was "incredibly difficult because as soon as warped her face in any direction, the shine kind of came off it". To combat this, they ended up focusing on anything below her nose, where they had the freedom to make things "as horrific as needed to" and then above her nose, " could manipulate it somewhat with warps and color correction in her eye sockets. So even at her worst, she had some of that sexiness throughout".

Nordby said most of the attention was devoted to Jennifer's face and that "very quickly in combination" with special effects and makeup, MPC thought up a five-station system for what Jennifer goes through. Nordby stated:

Stage one is beautiful Jennifer and then two and three were strictly makeup where her eyes become more recessed and she would start to look plain like the rest of us. And stage four was some custom dentures that KNB made for her, and then visual effects in stage four was mainly facial warping and recessing her eyes some more and having a pinning effect to her irises and a variety of other musculature deforms, just bringing her cheek bones down more. And stage five was the full on, as crazy as it gets, which you don't really see until near the end.

During testing, Nordby and the special effects teams realized that getting Fox in and out of the appliance used to create Jennifer's murderous jaw would be too time-consuming. To remedy this, they hired a photo double. "very day (for about 10 days) she would sit in a chair with this full appliance on her and we would shoot this jaw, and then all would have to do is the dentures", stated Nordby. He said that "when it came time to shoot any of these jaw moments, would act out in rehearsal how she was going to attack her victim and fine tune that blocking so it was relatively locked". The camera accompanied them in the same way, as "it would roll and she would put her dentures in, and they would really distort her face" in a way that would produce a satisfying and nice side effect. Additionally, the team would have Fox wear contact lenses and go through exactly the same motions as normal Jennifer. "But then I would shoot all the key poses that existed in whatever moves the digital double was doing, so that we had as much of that appliance in that lighting condition that we could get", said Nordby. "KNB also created a hairless but high detailed head of the stage five Jennifer that had an articulating jaw."

Seyfried (left) as Needy during the fire which leads to Jennifer's kidnapping, and Fox (right) as demonic Jennifer a month after the incident; the special effects teams recessed the character's eyes and added a pinning effect to her irises, along with a variety of other musculature deforms to create the illusion.

Nordby spent a significant amount of time shooting "the articulating jaw" scene because they had "ultimate control over how the light was hitting the head". He said, "This so-called jaw shot became a pivotal point, because for four months of the post, the filmmakers thought the film was getting too scary so MPC pulled back on the jaw and then they thought it wasn't scary enough." Because of this, "they pushed back and this jaw went back and forth quite a bit to help navigate where they wanted the tone on any given day". These different poses helped the two teams perfect the jaw scenes. "From a marketing point of view, from all the test screenings they did", said Nordby, "there was a lot of work figuring out how to make this a scary film as well as a funny film." Since the team was on a small budget, they "relied more on skilled artists to think through shots rather than a brute force approach".

MPC additionally worked on the disappearing waterfall that serves as Jennifer's grave when she is killed at the beginning of the film. They transformed the mysterious waterfall into a whirlpool. "We came up with an approach that we thought would work because we had a lot of confidence in our water sims", stated Nordby. "The waterfall appears both as a day and night shot, so we had to integrate with the water. And the night shots play a pivotal role in the film, and we do a huge crane over." They could not lock it to a pan or to a tilt and filming the shots was difficult due to the actual base of the waterfall being out of reach. Nordby said, "I eventually lowered down a shot—a ton of reference of the area because I knew we'd have to do some digi-matte work to recreate the basin that the whirlpool ends up in." They soon realized that there was an insufficient amount of churning and foam to read as real as the location. The CG Supervisor, Pete Dionne, presented a different idea. "He grabbed chunks of that river and tialing it so that it had a nice stretch of birds' eye point of view of the water that existed on the location in the lighting situation we were trying to match", stated Nordby. "And then he projected that onto a whirlpool of animated sprites and had similar enough texture to the actual water that existed there, but pulled control into lighting it and could add depth mainly to the center of it." Dealing with "very shallow" water, the team had to take extra care when filming the scenes.

During the film's fire scene, Cody appears as a character in the barroom. "To me, I am afraid of fire and fire technics and all that stuff which is why I don't know why I asked to be in the bar scene because I've never exploded before", she said. She had asked to be set on fire. "That was me trying to conquer a fear. By the way, they would not allow me to do a full burn for insurance purposes, even though I argued that Burt Reynolds had done it once", stated Cody. "But apparently he got really hurt, so they would not let me. To me, there's nothing more horrifying than being stuck in a claustrophobic space as it is burning down so, to me, it was more like tapping into a personal fear. That's not tough."

Filming

In late 2007, Fox Atomic had plans to film Jennifer's Body before a possible writer's strike. When the Writers Guild of America strike began, shooting was then moved to March 7, 2008, in Burnaby, British Columbia, specifically at Robert Burnaby Park near Cariboo Hill Secondary School. Some of the scenes, particularly those situated in a school setting, were filmed in local Vancouver-area schools such as Vancouver Technical Secondary School, Langley Secondary School and University Hill Secondary School. The waterfalls scene was filmed at Cascade Falls in Cascade Falls Regional Park in British Columbia.

Fox said that while filming her highly anticipated kissing scene with Seyfried that Seyfried was "extremely uncomfortable" but that she herself was not. "I feel much safer with girls, so I felt more comfortable kissing than kissing any of the other people that I had to kiss", she said. Seyfried's uneasiness in the scene caused "giggling fits" between takes. Seyfried said that neither of them wanted to do the kiss because they felt it was just for promotional purposes. She agreed with Fox that she was uneasy about acting out the scene. "It was my first time doing a real kissing scene with a woman", she stated. "It is just weird. It is a woman. With a woman's smell—soft and floraly—and maybe the pheromones are different. Something about it felt uncomfortable for me."

Music

Music was incorporated as an essential part of the film; there are "very specific bands" placed in band posters in some parts, such as in the selection of the band poster on the walls of the bar. Kusama said "he music was a huge component of the movie" and this is first evident with "the songs that we see and hear performed, but then, just the vibe of the movie actually". She said, "As the movie progresses, it becomes a pretty clearly music-oriented movie. It's sort of a youth movie. Some of those bands were totally made up and some of them are not."

Release

Critical response

Contemporary

The review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes reports that 46% of critics gave the film positive reviews, based on 212 reviews, and an average rating of 5.20/10. The website's critical consensus states, "Jennifer's Body features occasionally clever dialogue but the horror/comic premise fails to be either funny or scary enough to satisfy." At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average rating to reviews from mainstream critics, the film holds a score of 47 out of 100 based on 29 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews". Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "C−" on an A+ to F scale.

Film critic Roger Ebert enjoyed the film, dubbing it a "Twilight for boys" and saying "as a movie about a flesh-eating cheerleader, it's better than it has to be." Ebert said that within Cody there is "the soul of an artist, and her screenplay brings to this material a certain edge, a kind of gleeful relish, that's uncompromising. This isn't your assembly-line teen horror thriller". Additionally, he complimented Fox as " through" in her portrayal and "play the role straight". He gave the film three out of four stars. Rick Groen of The Globe and Mail gave the film three out of four stars. Peter Travers of Rolling Stone stated it is "Hot! Hot! Hot!" and that "Director Karyn Kusama is torn between duty to female empowerment and slasher convention". He credited Fox's portrayal as showing "a comic flair" that Transformers "never investigated". Tom Charity of CNN said " last time a horror flick tried for a distinctly female point of view the result was Twilight, which was more of a wan gothic romance than a chiller" and "Fox makes a convincing vixen, callously picking up victims whenever her luster begins to fade. It's not hard to imagine she can have anyone who takes her fancy". Charity credited the dialogue as "bitingly smart, funny teen-speak ... along with sharp pop culture references".

Mary Pols of Time magazine called the film entertaining and reasoned "here is a lot of intelligent camp here, and some sharply observed characterizations" and Cody and Kusama's "depiction of the ways in which women like Needy are willing to compromise themselves to indulge an ultimately less secure friend is spot-on". Dana Stevens of Slate praised the film for being "luscious and powerful, sexy and scary, maddening at times, but impossible to stop watching" and a "wicked black comedy with unexpected emotional resonance, one of the most purely pleasurable movies of the year so far". Elle's Karen Durbin said the film not only puts "a fresh spin on female-centric pop genres but also own them outright" and is "rich with first-rate performances".

The Miami Herald's Rene Rodriguez likened the film's " of the genre as a metaphor for adolescent angst, female sexuality and the strange, sometimes corrosive bonds between girls who claim to be best friends" to Brian De Palma's 1976 film Carrie. Rodriguez applauded the film for being fearless when delving into the subject of teen sex and for reversing the notion that only "bad girls have sex when they're 16 good ones—those who, like Needy, do their homework and are responsible—never slide past first base". Nick Pinkerton of Sci Fi Weekly called Fox and Seyfried's kissing scene "the best close-up girl-girl liplock" since Cruel Intentions (1999), and A. O. Scott of The New York Times concluded "the movie deserves—and is likely to win—a devoted cult following, despite its flaws" and that " are mitigated by a sensibility that mixes playful pop-culture ingenuity with a healthy shot of feminist anger".

Giving a partially negative review of the film was Joshua Rothkopf of Time Out New York, who said the "movie has a centerfold sheen to it—and some lesbianic soft-core flirtation to match—as its plot dives deeply into Twilight-esque heavy-melo meltdown in the last act" and that "Cody throws one too many losses at Needy; the screenwriter loses her satiric way about halfway through. But for a while, this has real fangs". Ann Hornaday of The Washington Post said, "There's a certain kooky, kinky fun to be had with Jennifer's Body" but that "dmittedly, this is the stuff of lurid adolescent distraction, not great cinema" and "is strictly a niche item but provides a goofy, campy bookend to Drag Me to Hell (2009) on the B-movie shelf. Watch it, forget it, move on". San Francisco Chronicle's Peter Hartlaub stated, "Enjoy the film for its witty dialogue and fun performances, but know that there isn't a single good scare. An episode of Murder, She Wrote has more thrills." Hartlaub felt the film is not bad, is "almost always pleasing" and that Fox "proves that she has some range" but "the chances that it will be somebody else's pop culture reference 27 years from now are slim to none". Joe Neumaier of New York Daily News said, "Fox merely needs to look either vacant or evil, which the Transformers boy-toy does spookily well" but "ords and story are still the lifeblood of a movie, and Jennifer's Body is filled like a Twinkie with half-fleshed-out ideas". Disagreeing with Fox's performance, Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips called Fox "a pretty bad actress" who "doesn't seem to get Cody's sense of humor. At all". He reasoned the "movie's partially redeemed by Seyfried, who makes her character more than a repository for audience sympathy" and "her make-out scene with Fox is handled with more suspense and care than anything else in the movie".

Michael Sragow of The Baltimore Sun described the only "perfect aspect" of Jennifer's Body as being its title. "No one is going to like this movie for its brain", he said. Claudia Puig of USA Today stated of the film, "Jennifer's Body is not as hot as you hope it would be". Where others praised the film's dialogue, MSNBC's Alonso Duralde called the writing lazy and "orse still, all of Cody's trademark pop-culture–infused dialogue stands out as artificial and precious". Jennifer's Body, he said, wants "so badly" to be a Heathers-esque dark comedy, "but its shortcomings makes you appreciate why that earlier film was so great". Ty Burr of The Boston Globe also said the film wants to be like Heathers, and reminded him "a lot" of Heathers but the only scene in the film that "actually feels dangerous" is when the possessed Jennifer initiates a long and passionate kiss with Needy, which the film "very, very nervously backs away from" and that "Jennifer's Body falls into the dispiriting category of dumb movies made by smart people, in this case a glibly clever writer and a talented director who think a few wisecracks are enough to subvert the teen horror genre".

Retrospective

In 2018, Constance Grady reported in Vox that a new critical consensus was forming that appreciated the film as a "forgotten feminist classic". She stated that after the MeToo movement highlighted routine sexual harassment and misconduct in the media industry, the film's story of "a group of powerful men sacrificing a girl's body on the altar of their own professional advancement" became "uncomfortably familiar". This, according to Grady, allowed viewers to see the film, rather than as a sex fantasy, as a revenge fantasy as Jennifer uses her abused body against her attackers.

According to the screenwriter, Diablo Cody, the film was marketed "all wrong". She had argued with executives who wanted "to market this to boys who like Megan Fox. That's who's going to see it. And I was like. No! This is a movie for girls too! That audience, they did not attempt to reach."

In a 2022 essay on its status as a classic queer and bisexual film, Carmen Maria Machado wrote that Jennifer's Body speaks to "what it means to experience parallel sexualities with your best friend as you punch through the last vestiges of childhood." Machado rejects accusations that the film is guilty of queerbaiting, considering it instead an effective depiction of the "central body of water that is bisexuality" which many queer people spend at least some of their life in.

Box office

Though the film was expected to pull in a significant number of the late teenage/young adult audience, particularly males aged 17 and older, and though Cody hoped for a large female turnout, it earned a "disappointing" $2.8 million on its opening Friday and $6.8 million in its opening weekend at the North American box office; the film placed #5, while 3D animated film Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs placed #1 with $30.1 million. Produced for $16 million, Jennifer's Body did manage to attract the sizable female audience Cody wanted; 51% were female, with 70% of patrons under age 25. The film had been expected to benefit somewhat from its heavily marketed lesbian kissing scene between Fox and Seyfried, which, in addition to Fox being in the film, was thought to entice and successfully attract male viewers. Critic Jim Vejvoda at IGN stated that such a scene is not as shocking as it was in past decades and cannot be expected to significantly pull in an audience. The film grossed $16,204,793 domestically and $15,351,268 in international sales, for a worldwide total of $31,556,061.

Box-office analysts and critics debated the film's underperformance. Analyst Jeff Bock, of Exhibitor Relations, reasoned the film underperformed at the box office due to two reasons; the first, he said, is the genre. Bock stated that Americans get horror and comedy, but with the idea "of those two things together in one place, people suddenly get very dumb". "The horror-comedy genre is the toughest sell in Hollywood", he said. He noted films Tremors, Slither, Shaun of the Dead, Eight Legged Freaks and the Evil Dead series, and said that while many of those are considered critical and business successes, "none of them have brought in the megabucks that a simple horror or comedy can." In addition, he labeled the Scream franchise as more "straight-up horror" than comedy and stated Zombieland's box office performance would determine the horror-comedy genre's current viability.

Despite other R-rated horror films having centered around teenagers, some such as Scream having been successful, Bock said the second reason Jennifer's Body under-performed at the box office is the R-rating, which he described as a "killer" for the film. He said the film is set in high school and "sounds like the perfect package for teens" but that "the R rating banned many teens from the theaters" and the studio was left with "an R-rated film marketed to whom, exactly?" Nicole Sperling of Entertainment Weekly felt that it was a slow and disappointing weekend for the box office in general; 3D animated film Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs was steep competition, and with low box office performances by the Matt Damon film The Informant! and Jennifer Aniston film Love Happens, she concluded that this may support "the current hypothesis floating around Hollywood, that movie stars no longer matter" and that it takes more than a name to open a film. S.T. VanAirsdale of Movieline echoed Sperling's sentiment about the weekend, as "some of the stinkiest high-profile openings in recent memory". He concluded five reasons for Jennifer's Body's underperformance at the box office. The first, he said, is the distributor. "20th Century Fox's genre wing, Fox Atomic, had Jennifer's Body in the can by the time the mother ship shut it down last spring", he said. "Instead of offloading the film to Fox Searchlight, which nimbly maneuvered Diablo Cody's previous brainchild Juno to awards-season lucre in 2007, a decision was somehow reached to fill a gap in Big Fox's early fall slate with a gory" and "post-feminist horror romp starring Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried". VanAirsdale classified this as a "ig mistake" and that "ou'd have to go back to The Devil Wears Prada to find an example of a Fox release that worked without a genuine male lead; you'd probably have to go back to Aliens to find a genre example of such that they pulled off successfully." He named the second reason as the marketing, stating that the film was not well-marketed (whether by billboards, transit posters, lobby standees, or other promotional venues), even in New York City.

Cody (center) at Jennifer's Body screening at the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival.

VanAirsdale cited the release date and screening as the third and fourth reasons; he said there was confusion about what day the film was going to debut in theaters, and that Toronto is "a nation removed from the audience where the film's actual momentum had been accruing for at least a month" and that "this rarely works for early fall releases; not because news doesn't travel, obviously, but because it peels away a layer of accessibility that accompanies New York and L.A. bows." The final reason, he attributed to the critics, believing that the fusion of horror and teen comedy confused some of them. He mentioned Ty Burr's review in particular, and stated that the film could perhaps have used more horror and been funnier, but that the film is "ultimately a movie about two teenage girls' misadventures in victimization" and that "he jokes are virtually incidental to the friction imposed on women who happen to be two sides of the same coin. Who's the monster, and who made the monster? Sorry if you wanted Heathers with demons, fellas. Equipment's cheap these days; perhaps make your own?"

Hollywood.com box-office analyst and President Paul Dergarabedian said "the poor numbers don't mean Fox can't open a movie." "It may be a matter of just choosing the right projects for her", he told Associated Press. "She's trying to find a world beyond Transformers, and she will. She's young and has a lot of promise."

Home media

The film was released on DVD and Blu-ray on December 29, 2009, in the United States and Canada. In Australia, the DVD and Blu-ray was released on May 18, 2010. The film opened at #11 at the DVD sales chart, making $1.6 million in the first week off 104,000 DVD units. There is a rated and an unrated version of the film, with the unrated version running about five minutes longer than the theatrical version. The UK Blu-ray lacks most of the extras found on the locked US release.

Soundtrack

Main article: Jennifer's Body (Music from the Motion Picture)

The film's soundtrack was released by Fueled by Ramen on August 25, 2009, and featured previously released music by various indie rock and alternative rock bands such as White Lies, Florence + The Machine, Silversun Pickups and Black Kids. It also features pop punk band All Time Low and electropop singer Little Boots. In addition, the album features new songs from pop rock artists such as Cobra Starship and Panic! at the Disco and Paramore's lead singer Hayley Williams. The first single from the soundtrack is "New Perspective" by Panic! at the Disco.

The ending sequence of the film itself features a song, "Violet", from the album Live Through This by Hole. This same album also features a song entitled "Jennifer's Body." In total, the film features 22 songs, most of which are included on the soundtrack.

Graphic novel

As a tie-in to the film, Boom! Studios produced a Jennifer's Body graphic novel. The graphic novel expands on the film's universe and Jennifer's murders of the boys. It was written by Black Metal's Rick Spears, with the first nine pages illustrated by Jim Mahfood (Clerks). Two covers, in Fox's likeness, were designed; one for the direct market by Eric Jones (available only in comic specialty stores), and the other by Frank Cho for the mass market focusing more on "hellish Jennifer stories" with art by Mahfood, Hack/Slash's Tim Seely, DMZ's Nikki Cook, and Popgun's Ming Doyle. The novel was released in August 2009.

The novel features less of Jennifer than the film, but does capture her "going in for the kill" several times. It focuses heavily on following her soon-to-be victims and provides information on their personalities not elaborated on in the film so that readers can better conclude whether the boys deserved to be murdered. The novel consists of four chapters, with a prologue and an epilogue, with art provided for each by different artists. Each one follows a different boy and what is happening in his life just before Jennifer kills him.

On creating the story, Spears stated, "The best part for me as a writer was to show some events from the movie from a different point of view, sort of like Rashomon for you Kurosawa fans. And with comics we can get into the character's heads in a way that works well in comics and novels more so than in film." He stated, "... I was using the medium to change what we really know about these characters and twist around what we see in the movies. All the academics aside, it's also very funny and gore splattered."

Spears stated that while writing the stories, the film was still being made and he had not seen any of it at the time. He mainly learned about the characters through the script. "I got to read the screenplay. It was kinda crazy writing characters that were being changed on set and in the editing process. I had to bob and weave to keep up but that was all part of the fun", he said.

Possible sequel

In January 2024, screenwriter Diablo Cody expressed her interest in a possible sequel fifteen years after the first film. She said, "Nothing makes me happier than when a person approaches me and tells me that they love this movie."

See also

References

  1. "Jennifer's Body (15)". British Board of Film Classification. August 17, 2009. Retrieved September 19, 2014.
  2. ^ Kit, Borys (November 13, 2007). "Reitman has the jump on Cody's 'Body'". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 5, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2008. (subscription required)
  3. ^ Kwan, Jennifer (September 14, 2009). "Cody exorcises demons from "Jennifer's Body"". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved September 23, 2009.
  4. Evans, Ian; Lambert, Christine (2009), TIFF 2009: Jennifer's Body premiere photos, archived from the original on June 8, 2011, retrieved November 27, 2009
  5. 2009 Toronto Film Festival: Megan Fox's 'Jennifer's Body' Premiere Archived November 29, 2009, at the Wayback Machine video from Access Hollywood Archived July 13, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved November 25, 2009.
  6. ^ "Jennifer's Body (2009)". Rotten Tomatoes. Fandango Media. March 8, 2018. Archived from the original on April 28, 2020. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  7. ^ Stevens, Dana (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body". Slate. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  8. ^ Hartlaub, Peter (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer Body' sags under weight of cleverness". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on September 30, 2009. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  9. ^ Scott, A.O. (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body (2009): Hell Is Other People, Especially the Popular Girl". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  10. "The Comeback Kid: Jennifer's Body – revaluated in the #MeToo era". The Everyday. April 19, 2022. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  11. "How Jennifer's Body went from a flop in 2009 to a feminist cult classic today". www.vox.com. October 31, 2018. Archived from the original on January 15, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  12. Ouellette, Jennifer (September 21, 2019). "Horror film Jennifer's Body bombed 10 years ago; now it's a cult classic". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on April 21, 2024. Retrieved August 22, 2024.
  13. Colangelo, B. J. (May 5, 2022). "How Jennifer's Body Became A True Cult Classic". /Film. Archived from the original on January 11, 2023. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  14. Kit, Borys; Simmons, Leslie (October 23, 2007). "Atomic has Cody 'Body,' Fox part". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on January 10, 2010. Retrieved February 11, 2008. (subscription required)
  15. Fleming, Michael (January 7, 2008). "Kusama to direct Cody's 'Body'". Variety. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  16. ^ Roberts, Sheila (2009). "Megan Fox, Diablo Cody Interview, Jennifers Body". MoviesOnline. Archived from the original on September 5, 2009. Retrieved September 26, 2009.
  17. "Fox Searchlight Lawyer's Defend Jennifer's Body from Snarky Bloggers". mediabistro.com. February 11, 2008. Archived from the original on June 29, 2009. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  18. Chavez, Kellvin (January 8, 2008). "Exclusive: Jennifer's Body Story Details". Latinoreview.com. Archived from the original on January 19, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  19. Longworth, Karina (February 11, 2008). "Diablo Cody: Above Critique?". Spout Blog. Archived from the original on March 19, 2008. Retrieved April 9, 2008.
  20. Frazier, Adam (December 15, 2007). "Jennifer's Body". Counting Down The Hours. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved April 9, 2008.
  21. Drees, Rich (March 14, 2008). "Jennifer's Body Script Review". FilmBuffOnLine. Archived from the original on May 19, 2008. Retrieved April 9, 2008.
  22. "Review- Diablo Cody's "Body"". Mystery Man On Film. March 5, 2008. Archived from the original on March 8, 2008. Retrieved April 9, 2008.
  23. "Jennifer's Body: Every Similarity to 2000's Ginger Snaps". Screen Rant. April 23, 2020. Archived from the original on June 5, 2023. Retrieved March 1, 2024.
  24. ^ Duralde, Alonso (September 17, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' fails at horror and comedy. For all its pedigree, teen fright flick winds up a mess". Today.com. Archived from the original on November 27, 2017. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  25. ^ Pinkerton, Nick (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body". Sci Fi Weekly. Archived from the original on September 23, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  26. ^ Murnane, Jamie (September 8, 2009). "Diablo Cody didn't do the same-sex kiss in "Jennifer's Body" for publicity". AfterEllen.com. Archived from the original on September 12, 2009. Retrieved September 26, 2009.
  27. Mr. Disgusting (October 23, 2007). "Megan Fox to Star in Supernatural-Comedy 'Jennifer's Body'". Bloody Disgusting. Archived from the original on November 20, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  28. ^ Rotten, Ryan (July 29, 2009). "Megan Fox Talks Jennifer's Body FX". shocktillyoudrop.com. Archived from the original on September 30, 2009. Retrieved September 26, 2009.
  29. Kit, Borys; Simmons, Leslie (February 8, 2008). "Seyfried in 'Body' cast". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on January 10, 2010. Retrieved February 11, 2008. (subscription required)
  30. ^ Sabella, Jen (August 18, 2009). "Amanda Seyfried rolls her eyes about kissing Megan Fox". AfterEllen.com. Archived from the original on August 21, 2009. Retrieved October 14, 2009.
  31. Faraci, Devin (February 5, 2008). "Jennifer's body is going authentically Emo!". Chud.com. Archived from the original on February 8, 2008. Retrieved February 11, 2008.
  32. Perry, Byron (March 5, 2008). "Johnny Simmons". Variety. Archived from the original on December 3, 2019. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  33. Bierly, Mandi (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' bad boy Adam Brody takes the EW Pop Culture Personality Test". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on October 19, 2014. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  34. "Megan Fox on the 'Make-Up Process' for Jennifer's Body at Hot Topic Event". maximotv. September 16, 2009.
  35. ^ Desowitz, Bill (September 22, 2009). "Jennifer's Body: Jaw Dropping VFX". Animation World Network. Archived from the original on September 26, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  36. ^ Rosenberg, Adam (August 31, 2009). "Megan Fox Talks About Her 'Jennifer's Body' Kiss With Amanda Seyfried". MTV. Archived from the original on October 1, 2009. Retrieved September 26, 2009.
  37. Wightman, Catriona (October 4, 2009). "Seyfried: 'Kissing Megan Fox was weird'". Digital Spy. Archived from the original on October 7, 2009. Retrieved October 14, 2009.
  38. "Jennifer's Body Reviews". Metacritic. CBS Interactive. September 17, 2009. Archived from the original on October 17, 2018. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  39. Ben Fritz (September 20, 2009). "Prospects for 'Cloudy' future mixed as 'Informant,' 'Love Happens,' 'Jennifer's Body' disappoint". Archived from the original on January 24, 2014. Retrieved January 10, 2014.
  40. Ebert, Roger (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body (R)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 7, 2019. Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  41. Rick Groen (September 17, 2009). "Hot high-school horror, with bite". The Globe and Mail (Toronto). Archived from the original on November 29, 2017. Retrieved September 1, 2017.
  42. ^ Travers, Peter (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  43. Charity, Tom (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' is a winner". CNN. Archived from the original on October 3, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  44. Pols, Mary (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body: Megan Fox Is a Man Eater". Time. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 28, 2009.
  45. Durbin, Karen (September 18, 2009). "Whip It, Jennifer's Body". Elle. Archived from the original on August 9, 2011. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  46. ^ Rodriguez, Rene (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body (R) **½: Flirting with greatness, bedeviled by timidity". The Miami Herald. Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  47. Rothkopf, Joshua (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body". Time Out New York. Archived from the original on September 23, 2009. Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  48. Hornaday, Ann (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer's Body". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 10, 2012. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  49. Neumaier, Joe (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body': Megan Fox zombie horror satire needs more fleshing out". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  50. ^ Phillips, Michael (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' ★★. How bad do you want it?". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on September 28, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2009.
  51. Sragow, Michael (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' is dodgy hipster horror film". Baltimore Sun. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  52. Puig, Claudia (September 18, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body': Kind of hot, but a little flabby in spots". USA Today. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 20, 2009.
  53. Burr, Ty (September 18, 2009). "Jennifer' Body Fox can't heat up 'Body'". Boston.com. The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on September 24, 2009. Retrieved September 25, 2009.
  54. ^ Grady, Constance (October 31, 2018). "How Jennifer's Body went from a flop in 2009 to a feminist cult classic today". Vox. Archived from the original on November 1, 2018. Retrieved November 1, 2018.
  55. VanDerWerff, Emily Todd (November 10, 2018). "The life, death, and rebirth of Jennifer's Body, according to screenwriter Diablo Cody". Vox. Archived from the original on May 3, 2019. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  56. Machado, Carmen Maria (2022). "Both Ways". In Vallese, Joe (ed.). It Came From the Closet. New York City: The Feminist Press. pp. 21–28. ISBN 9781952177798. OCLC 1325677846.
  57. "Friday Estimates: Meatballs And Informant Do Well, Jennifer's Body And Love Happens Don't". The Box Office Junkie. September 19, 2009. Archived from the original on September 26, 2009.
  58. ^ "'Cloudy' wins weekend boxoffice". The Hollywood Reporter. September 20, 2009. Archived from the original on June 18, 2023. Retrieved June 18, 2023.
  59. LexiB (September 21, 2009). "Jennifer's Body D.O.A in Weekend Box Office". LexiB. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011. Retrieved September 25, 2009.
  60. ^ Jim Vejvoda (September 17, 2009). "Jennifer's Body Review. Jennifer's Body Review. Megan Fox's new movie isn't scary, funny or hot enough". IGN. Archived from the original on January 29, 2012. Retrieved January 4, 2014.
  61. "JENNIFER'S BODY". Box Office Mojo. Archived from the original on October 16, 2009. Retrieved October 21, 2009.
  62. ^ Gornstein, Leslie (September 21, 2009). "Did Jennifer's Body Bomb Because of Megan Fox?". E!. Archived from the original on September 24, 2009. Retrieved September 21, 2009.
  63. Sperling, Nicole (September 21, 2009). "Box Office: 'Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs' soars; 'Jennifer's Body' sinks". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on September 2, 2012. Retrieved September 22, 2009.
  64. ^ VanAirsdale, S.T. (September 21, 2009). "So What Went Wrong with Jennifer's Body?". Movieline. Archived from the original on January 29, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2009.
  65. ^ "Jennifer Aniston, Megan Fox Bomb at the Box Office". Us Weekly. September 21, 2009. Archived from the original on September 24, 2009. Retrieved September 21, 2009.
  66. "Exclusive Behind-the-Scenes Clip from Jennifer's Body Home Video Release". July 2, 2012. Archived from the original on May 19, 2014. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
  67. "Jennifer's Body - DVD Sales". The Numbers. Archived from the original on February 17, 2010. Retrieved April 24, 2010.
  68. "Jennifer's Body: Amanda Segfried, Megan Fox: Movies & TV". Amazon. December 29, 2009. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024. Retrieved April 24, 2010.
  69. "Jennifer's Body (+ Digital Copy) [Blu-ray]: Megan Fox, Amanda Seyfried, Jennifer's Body: Movies & TV". Amazon. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024. Retrieved April 24, 2010.
  70. ^ Jennifer's Body at AllMusic Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  71. Jennifer's Body Archived October 4, 2009, at the Wayback Machine at what-song Archived December 28, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  72. Rotten, Ryan (July 15, 2009). "EXCL: First Look at the Jennifer's Body Graphic Novel". shocktillyoudrop.com. Archived from the original on September 18, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  73. Jones, Brent (September 2, 2009). "'Jennifer's Body' creeps into theaters ... and comics". USA Today. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  74. ^ "Radiation Interrogation featuring Jennifer's Body creators Rick Spears, Tim Seeley and Jim Mahfood!". Atomiccomics.com. August 26, 2009. Archived from the original on August 28, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2009.
  75. Bergeson, Samantha (January 26, 2024). "Diablo Cody Wants 'Jennifer's Body 2' 15 Years After Being 'Humiliated' by Original's Box Office Bomb". IndieWire. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.
  76. Tinoco, Armando; Sitek, Natalie (February 6, 2024). "Diablo Cody Says 'Lisa Frankenstein' Takes Place In The Same Universe As 'Jennifer's Body'; Talks Reboot". Archived from the original on March 2, 2024. Retrieved February 20, 2024.

External links

Films directed by Karyn Kusama
Works by Diablo Cody
Films written
Television
Book
Stage
Jason Reitman
Films directed
Films produced
Related
Categories: