Paleolithic continuity paradigm: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:01, 10 July 2014 editYagmurlukorfez (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users527 edits Reverting IP vandal's POV← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:30, 9 December 2023 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,234,769 editsm Fixing broken anchor: 2023-09-21 #Palaeolithic continuity theory→Proto-Indo-European homeland#Paleolithic continuity theory Tag: Redirect target changed
(64 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			#REDIRECT ]
	{{multiple issues\|

	{{primary sources\|date=October 2011}}
			{{Redirect category shell\|
	{{undue\|date=October 2011}}
			{{R to section}}
			{{R from subtopic}}
			{{R from alternative spelling\|of=Palaeolithic continuity paradigm}}
			{{R from alternative name\|of=Paleolithic continuity theory}}
	}}		}}
	{{Indo-European topics}}

	The '''Paleolithic Continuity Theory''' (or '''PCT''', Italian ''La teoria della continuità''), since 2010 relabelled as the '''Paleolithic Continuity Paradigm''' (or '''PCP'''), is a ] suggesting that the ] (PIE) can be traced back to the ], several millennia earlier than the ] or at the most ] estimates in other scenarios of ]. Its main proponents are ], ], and ]. Alinei advanced the theory in his '''''Origini delle Lingue d’Europa '''''(Origins of the Languages of Europe), published in two volumes in 1996 and 2000.<ref>
	La teoria della continuità (1996), Bologna : Mulino
	ISBN 88-15-05513-4, 779 pages ; ''Continuità dal Mesolitico all'età del Ferro nelle principali aree etnolinguistiche'' (2000) Bologna : Mulino, ISBN 88-15-07386-8, 1113 pages
	.
	</ref>

	The PCT posits that the advent of Indo-European languages should be linked to the arrival of ] in Europe and Asia from Africa in the ].<ref name=continuitas/> Employing "lexical periodization", Alinei arrives at a timeline deeper than even that of ]'s ].<ref>: "The sharp, and now at last admitted even by traditionalists (Villar 1991) differentiation of farming terminology in the different IE languages, while absolutely unexplainable in the context of ], provides yet another fundamental proof that the differentiation of IE languages goes back to remote prehistory."</ref>

	Since 2004, an informal workgroup of scholars who support the Paleolithic Continuity Theory has been held online.<ref>http://www.continuitas.org/workgroup.html</ref> Apart from Alinei himself, its leading members (referred to as "Scientific Committee" in the website) are linguists ] (]) and ] (]). Also included are prehistorian ] (]) and anthropologist ] (]).<ref name=continuitas></ref>

	The Paleolithic Continuity Theory is distinctly a minority view as it enjoys very little academic support, serious discussion being limited to a small circle of scholars. It is not listed by Mallory among the ] that are widely discussed and considered credible within academia.<ref>{{Cite book
	\| last=Mallory \| first=James P. \| author-link=J.P. Mallory
	\| contribution=The homelands of the Indo-Europeans \| editor-last=Blench \| editor-first=Roger
	\| editor2-last=Spriggs \| editor2-first=Matthew
	\| title=Archaeology and Language \| publication-place=London
	\| year=1997 \| publisher=Routledge \| volume=I: ''Theoretical and Methodological Orientations''
	\| page=106
	}}</ref>

	==General lines==
	The framework of PCT is laid out by Alinei in four main assumptions:<ref name=continuitas/>

	# Continuity is the basic pattern of European prehistory and the basic working hypothesis on the origins of IE languages.
	# Stability and antiquity are general features of languages.
	# The lexicon of natural languages, due to its antiquity, may be "periodized" along the entire course of human evolution.
	# Archaeological frontiers coincide with linguistic frontiers.

	The continuity theory draws on a Continuity Model (CM), positing the presence of IE and non-IE peoples and languages in Europe from Paleolithic times and allowing for minor invasions and infiltrations of local scope, mainly during the last three millennia.<ref></ref>

	Arguing that continuity is "the archeologist's easiest pursuit," Alinei deems this "the easiest working hypothesis," putting the burden of proof on competing hypotheses as long as none provide irrefutable counter-evidence. Alinei also claims linguistic coherence, rigor and productivity in the pursuit of this approach.<ref name=continuitas/>

	==Historical reconstruction==
	] identification of the horse riding ] (Y) and ] (SS) ] cultures with neighboring ] and ] peoples in the 4th and 3rd millennium BC.<ref name="Alinei1"/>]]
	Associated with the Paleolithic Continuity Theory (PCT) is the historical reconstruction proposed by Alinei, which suggests that Indo-European speakers were native in Europe since the ]. According to this reconstruction, the differentiation process of languages would have taken an extremely long time; by the end of the Ice Age the Indo-European language family had differentiated into proto ]/]/]/]/] speakers occupying territories within or close to their traditional homelands. The rate of change accelerated when (Neolithic) social stratification and colonial wars began. Summarizing:<ref name=continuitas/>

	# The colonial expansion of the Celts started much earlier than ] and proceeded (generally) from West to East, not vice versa.
	# The Mesolithic cultures of Northern Europe are identified with already differentiated Celtic, Germanic, Baltic and Uralic groups.
	# Scandinavia was colonized by Germanic groups "only" after deglaciation, and was better able to preserve its original character in isolation. Germany, in contrast, suffered fragmentation as a result of the Neolithic appearance of the ], and developed a wealth of dialects.
	# The prehistoric distribution of proto-languages akin to Italic was an important factor underlying the current distribution of Romance languages throughout Europe.
	# The Slavic languages originated in the ] and became linked with the Neolithic expansion. This group would be especially identified by the ].<ref name=hungarian>.</ref>

	The Paleolithic Continuity hypothesis reverses the Kurgan hypothesis and largely identifies the Indo-Europeans with ]'s "Old Europe."<ref>Gimbutas, Marija. "Old Europe c.7000-3500 BC., the earliest European cultures before the infiltration of the Indo-European peoples". ''Journal of Indo-European Studies'', 1, 1973, pp. 1-20.</ref> PCT reassigns the Kurgan culture (traditionally considered early Indo-European) to a people of predominantly mixed ] and ] stock. Alinei argues that the use of borrowed Turkic words in horse terminology, such as ''qaptï'' ("to grab with hands and teeth"), ''yabu'' ("horse"), ''yam'' ("nomadic caravan-tent"), ''yuntă'' ("horse" (generic)), ''aygur'' ("stallion"), ''homut'' ("horse collar") and ''alaša'' ("pack horse"), in ] (Northern and Southern), in some ] and ], "proves the antiquity of Turkic presence in the European area bordering Asia". He further suggests, by proposing an ] indigenism in Asia and eastern Europe, that horse domestication originated with Turkic peoples, offering this as an explanation why horse terminology in the European area bordering ] and in most of ] is rooted in Turkic and not ] vocabulary.<ref name="Alinei1">Mario Alinei ('''2003'''), "", Quaderni di semantica, vol. 26.</ref> He supports this hypothesis by making a tentative linguistic identification of ] as a Uralic, ] people that had already undergone strong ] influence in the third millennium BC,<ref name=hungarian/> when Pontic invasions would have brought this people to the Carpathian Basin. A subsequent migration of ] signature around 1250 BC is said to have caused this ethnic group to expand south in a general movement of people. This is equated with the upheaval of the ] and the overthrow of an earlier Italic substrate at the onset of the "Etruscan" ].<ref name=hungarian/>

	==Genetics==

	In introduction to PCT ] argues, following ], that the distribution of genetic markers largely corresponds to that of languages. He further contends that 80% of Europe's human genetic material dates back to the Paleolithic, and cites ] in claiming that only a fifth of European DNA can be traced back to neolithic incomers.<ref name=continuitas/>

	A 2009 study comparing mitochondrial DNA lineages of late hunter-gatherers, early farmers, and modern Europeans found large differences between the three groups. In particular, 82% of hunter-gatherers had maternal lineages that are rare in modern central Europeans.<ref name=discontinuity>{{cite news \| author = B. Bramanti \| url = \| title= We Are Not Our Ancestors: Evidence for Discontinuity between Prehistoric and Modern Europeans \| date = 3 September 2009 \| work = sciencemag.org \| accessdate = 19 January 2010}}</ref>

	The origin of paternal lineages remains difficult to prove because modern science is unable to extract Y-DNA haplogroups from Paleolithic samples. However, the recent analysis of Arredi, Poloni and Tyler-Smith (2007) suggests that ], the most common western European haplogroup, may have entered Europe only in the Neolithic.<ref name="neolithic">{{cite news \| author = Arredi, Poloni and Tyler-Smith \| url = http://books.google.ca/books?id=tlSspaBLkhoC&pg=PA380&lpg=PA394#PPA394,M1 \| title = The Peopling of Europe \| year = 2007 \| work = Michael Crawford, Anthropological Genetics, pp. 380-408}}</ref>

	==Reception==
	Alinei's ''Origini delle Lingue d’Europa'' was reviewed favourably in 1996 by Jonathan Morris in '']'', a journal dedicated to the reconstruction of Paleolithic language, judging Alinei's theory as being
	<blockquote>"both simpler than its rivals and more powerful in terms of the insights it provides into language in the Meso- and Palaeolithic. While his book contains some flaws I believe that it deserves to be regarded as one of the seminal texts on linguistic archaeology, although given its lamentable lack of citation in English-language circles, it appears that recognition will have to wait until a translation of the original Italian appears."</blockquote>
	Morris's review was reprinted as the foreword to the 2000 edition of Alinei's book.<ref>Morris, Jonathan. Review: "Mario Alinei - Origini delle Lingue d’Europa ; Volume 1 – Teoria della Continuità , Volume 2 – Continuità dal Mesolítico all’età di ferro nelle principali aree etnolinguistiche (Il Mulino – Bologna, 1996 and 2000)." </ref>

	Renzi (1997) sharply criticized Alinei's book, refuting in particular the claim of the presence of Latin and of its different territorial forms in Italy in the 2nd millennium BC. Renzi argues that this theory would subvert firmly established concepts of Romance philology and dialectology, such as the concepts of ], ] and so on.<ref>''Alinei, ovvero il latino prima di Roma'', RID. Rivista italiana di dialettologia, ISSN 1122-6331, 1997, vol. 21, pp. 191-202.</ref>

	Alinei's theory was again critically reviewed by Adiego Lajara (2002):<ref>Ignasi-Xavier Adiego Lajara , ''Indoeuropeïtzació al paleolític? Algunes reflexions sobre la "teoria della continuità" de Mario Alinei'', Estudis romànics, ISSN 0211-8572, Nº. 24, 2002, pp. 7-30 .</ref>
	{{quote\|Although some of Alinei's reflections on linguistic change are very interesting, it should be said that certain conceptions in his work -- such as the excessive immobility of languages or the relationship between types of language and progress in the prehistoric lithic industry -- are very debatable. Alinei's core theory -- continuity from the Palaeolithic --, runs into a serious difficulty: it obliges us to deal with words traditionally reconstructed for Indo-European, referring to notions that did not exist in the Palaeolithic as loans, when from the formal standpoint they are indistinguishable from those Alinei sees as being Indo-European in the Palaeolithic period.}}

	==PCT workgroup==
	List of few members of scholars of ''The PCT workgroup'' to which the Paleolithic Continuity Theory attributed interest in, and acceptance of:<ref></ref>

	*Linguist Mario Alinei - University of Utrecht.
	*Linguist Xaverio Ballester - Universidad de Valencia.
	*Philologist ] - Università di Bologna.
	*Linguist Franco Cavazza - Università di Bologna.
	*Linguist Michel Contini - Università Stendhal de Grenoble.
	*Linguist Gabriele Costa - Università del Molise.
	*Linguist Philippe Dalbera - Université de Nice.
	*Historian Paolo Galloni - Edizioni Viella, Roma.
	*Anthropologist ] - University of Utah - Salt Lake C.
	*Prehistorian Alexander Hausler - Universitat Halle/Saale.
	*Linguist Alfio Lanaia - Università di Catania.
	*Linguist Jean Le Dû - Université de Brest.
	*Anthropologist Matteo Meschiari - Università di Palermo.
	*Prehistorian ] - Université de Liyge.

	==See also==
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	* ]
	*]
	*]

	==References==
	{{Reflist}}

	==Literature==
	*Adams, Jonathan and Otte, Marcel. "Did Indo-European Languages spread before farming?" '']'', 40, No. 1. (February, 1999), pp. 73–77.
	*Alinei, Mario. "An Alternative Model for the Origins of European Peoples and Languages: the continuity theory". ''Quaderni di Semantica'' 21, 2000, pp. 21–50.
	* Alinei, Mario (2002). "Towards a Generalized Continuity Model for Uralic and Indo-European Languages" in ''The Roots of Peoples and languages of Northern Eurasia IV'', edited by K. Julku.
	* Alinea Mario. "Interdisciplinary and Linguistic Evidence for Palaeolithic Continuity of European, Uralic and Altaic Populations in Eurasia". ''Quaderni di Semantica'', 24, 2, 2003.

	==External links==
	*
	**

	]
	]
	]
	]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 9 December 2023

Redirect to:

Proto-Indo-European homeland#Paleolithic continuity theory

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:

To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to a subsection or subheader, use {{R to subsection}}. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.

From a subtopic: This is a redirect from a subtopic of the target article or section.
- If the redirected subtopic could potentially have its own article in the future, then also tag the redirect with {{R with possibilities}} and {{R printworthy}}.

From an alternative spelling: This is a redirect from a title with an alternative spelling of Palaeolithic continuity paradigm. Pages that link to this redirect may be updated to link directly to the target page if that results in an improvement of the text. Do not "fix" such links if they are not broken. Also, these links should not be replaced with piped links.
- There are many more specific templates such as {{R from alternative hyphenation}}, {{R from alternative punctuation}} and {{R from alternative spacing}}. Also see subcategories of Category:Redirects from modifications for other options (capitals, abbreviations, diacritics, plurals, stylizations, transliteration, ligatures, different parts of speech, etc.)

From an alternative name: This is a redirect from a title that is another name or identity such as an alter ego, a nickname, or a synonym of the target, or of a name associated with the target (in this case, the more common name is: Paleolithic continuity theory).
- This redirect leads to the title in accordance with the naming conventions for common names to aid searches and writing. It is not necessary to replace these redirected links with a piped link.
- If this redirect is an incorrect name for the target, then {{R from incorrect name}} should be used instead.

When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.