| Revision as of 00:24, 14 July 2014 view sourceSue Rangell (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,776 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:25, 7 October 2023 view source JJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,666,242 editsm Moving Category:Misplaced Pages AfC reviewers to Category:Misplaced Pages Articles for Creation reviewers per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 September 19#Category:Misplaced Pages AfC reviewers |
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
|
|description=This page has been semi-protected from editing. |
|
|description=This page has been semi-protected from editing. |
|
|id=prot |
|
|id=prot |
|
⚫ |
| extra_offset = 26 |
|
|width=24 |
|
|width=24 |
|
|icon_nr =11 |
|
|sortkey =11 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
| Line 14: |
Line 15: |
|
| description = This user has account creator rights on the English Misplaced Pages. |
|
| description = This user has account creator rights on the English Misplaced Pages. |
|
| id = accountcreator-icon |
|
| id = accountcreator-icon |
|
| icon_nr = 10 |
|
| sortkey = 10 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
| extra_offset = 25 |
|
| width = 24 |
|
| width = 24 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Autopatrolled topicon |
|
{{Autopatrolled topicon |
|
| icon_nr = 9 |
|
| sortkey = 9 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
| extra_offset = 24 |
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
{{AWB topicon |
|
| ⚫ |
| icon_nr = 5 |
|
| ⚫ |
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Rollback |
|
{{Rollback |
|
| icon_nr = 7 |
|
| sortkey = 8 |
|
| extra_offset = 23 |
|
| extra_offset = 23 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{reviewer topicon |
|
{{reviewer topicon |
|
| icon_nr = 6 |
|
| sortkey = 7 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{AWB topicon |
|
⚫ |
| sortkey = 6 |
|
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{CVU topicon |
|
|
| sortkey = 5 |
|
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
|
| nocat = no = disables the automatically added category (default = no) |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WPCleaner topicon |
|
{{WPCleaner topicon |
|
| icon_nr = 4 |
|
| sortkey = 4 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{email user |
|
{{email user |
|
| icon_nr = 5 |
|
| sortkey = 5 |
|
| extra_offset = 10 |
|
| extra_offset = 10 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Huggle topicon |
|
{{Huggle topicon |
|
| icon_nr = 2 |
|
| sortkey = 2 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
| extra_offset = 15 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| Line 57: |
Line 64: |
|
| article_name = Lothian Buses |
|
| article_name = Lothian Buses |
|
| date = 01/04/13 |
|
| date = 01/04/13 |
|
| icon_nr = 3 |
|
| sortkey = 3 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
| action = This user was the primary contributor to |
|
| action = This user was the primary contributor to |
| Line 63: |
Line 70: |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiSloth/topicon |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiSloth/topicon |
|
| icon_nr = 0 |
|
| sortkey = 0 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
| extra_offset = 0 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| Line 79: |
Line 86: |
|
|'''YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!''' |
|
|'''YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!''' |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
{{quote box|bgcolor=#eee9d9|salign=right |
|
{{Jimboquote|I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.}} |
|
|quote = I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons. |
|
|
|source = –<cite>Jimmy Wales </cite>}} |
|
{{quotation|1=Oh, let me explain, then. I hear from many people who are BLP enforcers that they feel unsupported and there are constant concerns about whether they will be fully backed if they do what is necessary. In general, I think those fears are overblown, but the point I am making today is that I am standing firm on this issue. BLP enforcement is important. Speedy deletion, blocking people violating the policy, protecting pages, sprotecting pages, what needs doing can be done confidently. First, protect the reputations of people who may be in a position of being victimized by someone by using our resources. And sort out the details later, there is no rush. If there's a horrible murderer out there somewhere and if for a week Misplaced Pages doesn't have an article at all, until finally some reliable sources are fine, that's perfectly ok. What's not ok is BLP violations. I think everyone agrees with that, but not everyone yet fully understands that those who disagree are quite simply wrong and will have no power when a decision comes in judgment of whatever may have happened in a difficult situation.|2=Jimbo Wales (talk)|3=<span class="plainlinks"></span>}} |
|
{{quotation|1=Oh, let me explain, then. I hear from many people who are BLP enforcers that they feel unsupported and there are constant concerns about whether they will be fully backed if they do what is necessary. In general, I think those fears are overblown, but the point I am making today is that I am standing firm on this issue. BLP enforcement is important. Speedy deletion, blocking people violating the policy, protecting pages, sprotecting pages, what needs doing can be done confidently. First, protect the reputations of people who may be in a position of being victimized by someone by using our resources. And sort out the details later, there is no rush. If there's a horrible murderer out there somewhere and if for a week Misplaced Pages doesn't have an article at all, until finally some reliable sources are fine, that's perfectly ok. What's not ok is BLP violations. I think everyone agrees with that, but not everyone yet fully understands that those who disagree are quite simply wrong and will have no power when a decision comes in judgment of whatever may have happened in a difficult situation.|2=Jimbo Wales (talk)|3=<span class="plainlinks"></span>}} |
|
</center> |
|
</center> |
| Line 367: |
Line 376: |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
] |
|
|
Notice: This is a Misplaced Pages user page, not a Misplaced Pages article.
As such it may contain opinions and unsupported facts...even possible HUMOR.
|
|
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
|
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.
–Jimmy Wales
Oh, let me explain, then. I hear from many people who are BLP enforcers that they feel unsupported and there are constant concerns about whether they will be fully backed if they do what is necessary. In general, I think those fears are overblown, but the point I am making today is that I am standing firm on this issue. BLP enforcement is important. Speedy deletion, blocking people violating the policy, protecting pages, sprotecting pages, what needs doing can be done confidently. First, protect the reputations of people who may be in a position of being victimized by someone by using our resources. And sort out the details later, there is no rush. If there's a horrible murderer out there somewhere and if for a week Misplaced Pages doesn't have an article at all, until finally some reliable sources are fine, that's perfectly ok. What's not ok is BLP violations. I think everyone agrees with that, but not everyone yet fully understands that those who disagree are quite simply wrong and will have no power when a decision comes in judgment of whatever may have happened in a difficult situation.
— Jimbo Wales (talk), 18:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
These are mostly humor articles that rubbed some admin or other the wrong way. I either created or contributed content to each of these. All have been up for deletion, speedy deletion, or are in a state of deletion as of this writing (any red ones).
Alaska • 
Japan • 
Switzerland • 
USA • 
California • 
Canada • 
Mexico • 
Barbados • 
Brazil • 
Texas • 
England • 
Nevada • 
Singapore • 
Colorado • 
Saudi Arabia • 
Michigan • 
Egypt • 
Florida • 
Hong Kong • 
Belize • 
Minnesota • 
Germany • 
New Mexico • 
Spain • 
Italy • 
Cuba • 
Jamaica• 
Bermuda • .svg){kind=small}
Antarctica • 
Chile • 
Nicaragua • 
Panama
This user is identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. (verify)
Categories: