Misplaced Pages

:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 12: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:16, 14 July 2014 editT13bot (talk | contribs)28,565 editsm T13bot task 1 using AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:18, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{| width = "100%" {| width = "100%"
|- |-
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="gray">&lt;</font> ] ! style="width:50%; text-align:left;" | <span style="color:gray;">&lt;</span> ]
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="gray">&gt;</font> ! style="width:50%; text-align:right;" | ] <span style="color:gray;">&gt;</span>
|}</div></noinclude> |}</div></noinclude>
===August 12=== ===August 12===
Line 38: Line 38:
The result of the discussion was '''Delete'''&nbsp;] ] 03:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC) The result of the discussion was '''Delete'''&nbsp;] ] 03:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
:{{Tfdlinks|Hitler related}} :{{Tfdlinks|Hitler related}}
Completely redundant to {{tl|Adolf Hitler}}. <font color="#082567">]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">]</font></sub> 07:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Completely redundant to {{tl|Adolf Hitler}}. ] ] ] 07:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


* Very good cross-references. Better under the title 'Hitler, Adolf.' Must-keep.] (]) 18:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC) * Very good cross-references. Better under the title 'Hitler, Adolf.' Must-keep.] (]) 18:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Line 58: Line 58:
The result of the discussion was '''delete.''' In light of the article covering the soundtrack of this movie, there is little reason to have a separate template for the soundtrack. ]<small>]</small> 06:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC) The result of the discussion was '''delete.''' In light of the article covering the soundtrack of this movie, there is little reason to have a separate template for the soundtrack. ]<small>]</small> 06:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
:{{Tfdlinks|Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?}} :{{Tfdlinks|Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?}}
I nominated this for deletion back in February, and the reasoning remains the same: the title of this template is incorrect, as these are a few of the songs that appear on the soundtrack, not a template listing multiple soundtracks; furthermore, there is already an article for the ], which goes into detail about all of the songs and music used in the film. This template offers no new information, and is not useful for navigation and research. The creator has made no attempt to edit or improve the template since the February discussion, despite his protestations that it could be fixed. <font face="Georgia">''']'''<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC) I nominated this for deletion back in February, and the reasoning remains the same: the title of this template is incorrect, as these are a few of the songs that appear on the soundtrack, not a template listing multiple soundtracks; furthermore, there is already an article for the ], which goes into detail about all of the songs and music used in the film. This template offers no new information, and is not useful for navigation and research. The creator has made no attempt to edit or improve the template since the February discussion, despite his protestations that it could be fixed. <span style="font-family:Georgia;">''']'''<sub>'']''</sub></span> 16:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep and rename''' - There is a value to such a template, but this is misnamed (should probably be ]) and underdeveloped. I'll see what I can do about improving it shortly; please consider alternate names and what might be best. ] (]) 19:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC) *'''Keep and rename''' - There is a value to such a template, but this is misnamed (should probably be ]) and underdeveloped. I'll see what I can do about improving it shortly; please consider alternate names and what might be best. ] (]) 19:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': Might be incomplete or incorrect. ''<font face="roman">]]</font>'' 19:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC) *'''Delete''': Might be incomplete or incorrect. ''<span style="font-family:roman;">]]</span>'' 19:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - I've just expanded it and fixed the name; please consider in light of these changes (and if there are other changes you feel are necessary, please let me know). Thanks, ] (]) 20:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - I've just expanded it and fixed the name; please consider in light of these changes (and if there are other changes you feel are necessary, please let me know). Thanks, ] (]) 20:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
**I've also added it to articles about applicable songs. Not sure about putting it on articles about the musicians though. ] (]) 20:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC) **I've also added it to articles about applicable songs. Not sure about putting it on articles about the musicians though. ] (]) 20:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:18, 11 February 2023

< August 11 August 13 >

August 12

Template:GrandTourTournaments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ 03:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:GrandTourTournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

appears to be a failed editing experiment, and possibly a copy of Template:Infobox GrandSlamTournaments. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 15:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Road March years

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ 03:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:Road March years (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

provides very little navigation, and the article which it navigates should probably be deleted. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hitler related

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ 03:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Template:Hitler related (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely redundant to {{Adolf Hitler}}. Sir Armbrust Contribs 07:46, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment Side bar templates don't entirely replace navigation templates, as the side ones are usually on the top right side, and box navigation templates are at the bottom. What guidelines govern side nav templates usage? Maybe one is redundant to the other. hbdragon88 (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
    • There are no hard and fast rules for sidebars, but nor should they be created lightly when a navbox covering a similar area already exists. In this case, the only difference between the two seems to be that the sidebar has rather less editorial discretion (for instance, it links to World War II: what article is it going to be transcluded on which doesn't mention World War II prominently in the wikitext?). We really don't need that sort of duplication. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ 00:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. In light of the article covering the soundtrack of this movie, there is little reason to have a separate template for the soundtrack. RyanGerbil10(Mac Miller stole my style! 06:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou? (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I nominated this for deletion back in February, and the reasoning remains the same: the title of this template is incorrect, as these are a few of the songs that appear on the soundtrack, not a template listing multiple soundtracks; furthermore, there is already an article for the soundtrack, which goes into detail about all of the songs and music used in the film. This template offers no new information, and is not useful for navigation and research. The creator has made no attempt to edit or improve the template since the February discussion, despite his protestations that it could be fixed. RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:12, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ 00:33, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.