Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Devyn Devine: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:57, 3 July 2006 editWinhunter (talk | contribs)14,068 edits →[]: d← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:06, 6 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the nomination was '''delete'''. ] ] 02:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
Another porn star "article" -- with a bad-taste photo too. *sigh*. I'm not a puritan, but if you are going to write up articles on specific porn stars, then they better pass the ] test and the article has to at least resemble a biography of some sort. -- <span style="border: 1px solid #003333;">]&nbsp;''']]'''</span> 19:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Another porn star "article" -- with a bad-taste photo too. *sigh*. I'm not a puritan, but if you are going to write up articles on specific porn stars, then they better pass the ] test and the article has to at least resemble a biography of some sort. -- <span style="border: 1px solid #003333;">]&nbsp;''']]'''</span> 19:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Line 6: Line 13:
:Well, I don't object to the ] article at all just saying the Devine image is much less revealing that the one in the Chandler article by a long shot. The Devine image is just an image of a rather well endowed lady.--] 19:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC) :Well, I don't object to the ] article at all just saying the Devine image is much less revealing that the one in the Chandler article by a long shot. The Devine image is just an image of a rather well endowed lady.--] 19:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''',The Photo can be changed or replace. But all the information is true and accurate. ] *'''Keep''',The Photo can be changed or replace. But all the information is true and accurate. ]
:The issue of this article's deletion is not over factuality, but notability. ]] 19:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC) :The issue of this article's deletion is not over factuality, but notability. ]] 19:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', fails ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', fails ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' fails ], as well as proposed guideline ]. ] 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' fails ], as well as proposed guideline ]. ] 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Line 12: Line 19:
**Not that I'm claiming bust size = notability in this case, but it could. If one can have a WP article simply for being among the tallest people in the world, then I'd imagine the person with the largest breasts in the world could have an article simply for that reason. -- ] 23:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC) **Not that I'm claiming bust size = notability in this case, but it could. If one can have a WP article simply for being among the tallest people in the world, then I'd imagine the person with the largest breasts in the world could have an article simply for that reason. -- ] 23:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*** Superlatives are not policy, ] is. ~ ] 00:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC) *** Superlatives are not policy, ] is. ~ ] 00:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
****Um... ]] 01:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC) ****Um... ]] 01:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Fails to meet relevant guidelines and lack of verifiable evidence. Judging from her Google hits, she is talented at self-promotion with her Yahoo group and myspace page on the first page of hits. However, there is a distinct lack of verifiable material from third-party sources. ] 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. Fails to meet relevant guidelines and lack of verifiable evidence. Judging from her Google hits, she is talented at self-promotion with her Yahoo group and myspace page on the first page of hits. However, there is a distinct lack of verifiable material from third-party sources. ] 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''Based on the information listed here http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=38716995&blogID=134388814&MyToken=afaa3621-42d9-4b21-a854-10f4de50ca7a and here http://www.herecomesjohn.com plus his direct relation to Howard Stern would make her bio acceptable. *<s>'''Keep'''</s> Based on the information listed here http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=38716995&blogID=134388814&MyToken=afaa3621-42d9-4b21-a854-10f4de50ca7a and here http://www.herecomesjohn.com plus his direct relation to Howard Stern would make her bio acceptable. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
**'''Comment''' Please "vote" only once. I've struck out your second "keep". Also, MySpace isn't a ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 05:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': fails ], which is only a proposed guideline but is very sensible in my opinion. &ndash;]&nbsp;(]/]) 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''': fails ], which is only a proposed guideline but is very sensible in my opinion. &ndash;]&nbsp;(]/]) 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' They why is Ron Jemery about to be kept? Or any porn star?] *<s>'''Keep'''</s> They why is Ron Jemery about to be kept? Or any porn star?]
::LMPjr007,Please see ] and ], as already previously mentioned above. ] 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) , ::LMPjr007,Please see ] and ], as already previously mentioned above. ] 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
**'''Comment''' I've struck out your third "keep". This is not a vote, but please don't argument-stack. --''']''' <small>]</small> 05:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Fails ] ] 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Fails ] ] 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' She's been on the Howard Stern Show multiple times. I've actually heard of her, which is very rare for such an "actress". I think this article could be expanded. -- ] 23:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Weak keep''' She's been on the Howard Stern Show multiple times. I've actually heard of her, which is very rare for such an "actress". I think this article could be expanded. -- ] 23:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' for failing ] --] <sup>(])</sup> 02:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' for failing ] --] <sup>(])</sup> 02:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', non-notable porn star. --]]] <sub>(] | ])</sub> 04:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
* '''Delete'''. Fails ] -- ]
*'''Keep''' passes ] #7 Performer has appeared multiple times in notable mainstream media outlets (the Air Force Amy rule) - by being on the Howard Stern show. ] 05:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 12:06, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mackensen (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Devyn Devine

Another porn star "article" -- with a bad-taste photo too. *sigh*. I'm not a puritan, but if you are going to write up articles on specific porn stars, then they better pass the Misplaced Pages:Notability (people) test and the article has to at least resemble a biography of some sort. --  Netsnipe  CVU   19:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, notable enough (google search) Misplaced Pages is not censored for children. In my humble much less revealing than this Rex Chandler and likely more notable, you are right could use a cleanup but the photo is not that offensive.--John Lake 19:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment Proposed guideline WP:PORN BIO specifically warns against google tests for this kind of subject due to the adult industry practice of google bombing Bwithh 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I know that Misplaced Pages isn't censored for children. In fact I wouldn't object to the Rex Chandler article at all that you've cited as an example because unlike the two I've nominated so far, it actually reads like a biography and links to a IMDB Page. This article on the other hand is uninformative and is thinly disguised link-spam. --  Netsnipe  CVU   19:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I don't object to the Rex Chandler article at all just saying the Devine image is much less revealing that the one in the Chandler article by a long shot. The Devine image is just an image of a rather well endowed lady.--John Lake 19:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep,The Photo can be changed or replace. But all the information is true and accurate. User:LMPjr007
The issue of this article's deletion is not over factuality, but notability. Yanksox 19:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
LMPjr007,Please see WP:BIO and WP:PORN BIO, as already previously mentioned above. Bwithh 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.