Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User names: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:10, 24 July 2014 editSYSS Mouse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,153 edits archiving← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024 edit undoSYSS Mouse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,153 edits archivingTag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{RFCUsername}} ] ] {{RFCUsername}} ] ]

==Reports== ==Reports==
Please remember that this is ''not a vote'', rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion. Please remember that this is ''not a vote'', rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
Line 5: Line 6:
<!-- Usernames should be *discussed* with the user prior to reporting here. --> <!-- Usernames should be *discussed* with the user prior to reporting here. -->
<!-- Undiscussed reports will be removed summarily. --> <!-- Undiscussed reports will be removed summarily. -->
<!-- Please be sure to use the {{subst:rfcn1|username|reason ~~~~}} template: --> <!-- Please be sure to use the {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}} template: -->
<!-- New reports go at the TOP, below this line. --> <!-- New reports go at the TOP, below this line. -->


:''Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the page.'' :''Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.''
----<!-- Below this one --> ----<!-- Below this one -->
===FletcherNathan===
{{#if:|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Misplaced Pages| |{{error:not substituted|Rfcn1}}<div style="display:none;">}}
{{user|FletcherNathan}}
New user whose only edits have been to the existing article about the politician ]. Edits are sourced, but all are positive material about the subject; I have tried to tone down some of the laudatory stuff or material with unreliable sourcing. User has been warned twice on their talk page, once about username, once about COI, with no response. Active ongoing editing as we speak. ] (]) 02:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
{{#if:|</div></div>}}
: '''Disallow''' under 'Misleading' username. The username implies that the user is the subject, to which I'm pretty sure they're not. However, if they are, that's clear ] editing. I would report this to the ] while you're at it. They seem to be pushing all positive views despite being a new user. ] (]) 02:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
:::Thanks for the suggestion, I have done that. --] (]) 03:29, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
: '''Allow''' This report should be at ], unless you believe this ''is'' the politician, then ] is in order. Otherwise too ambiguous. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 19:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

===BillMoyers===
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: Moccasin; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as ]). No further edits should be made to this section. ''
<!--Template:Rfcn top-->
The result was: Non-admin closure: '''User indefinitely blocked'''. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 19:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
{{#if:|<div style="display:none;">}} {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Misplaced Pages| |{{error:not substituted|Rfcn1}}<div style="display:none;">}}
{{user|BillMoyers}}
:
{{#if:|</div></div>}}
Violation of ] for "]. ] is a prominent television personality on PBS. If this editor does not share the same name then he should not use it. If he does, policy requires him to prove it. I directed this editor to the policy, but have received no response. ] (]) 23:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
: I concur that this name is a problem. ] (]) 17:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Disallow''' per ] unless they are able to prove their identity. ]'']]]'' 22:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
**Revised; see below. ]'']]]'' 02:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
***Restored, see below below. ]'']]]'' 21:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Bill responds . While I did originally report this username, I don't believe that the editor is attempting to impersonate a well-known person. I'm inclined to believe it is his real name but I think there could be confusion among readers (I was surprised to see the name) and it would be preferable if he changed it. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 01:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
:In that case, this part of the page I linked to above needs to be followed: "If you are using such a name because it is your real name, you should make clear on your userpage that you are not (or are not related to) the well-known person of that name." After that is done, there should be no more problems. Pinging ] so he can hopefully see this. ]'']]]'' 02:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
::He has not said it is his real name. ] (]) 12:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
::: He has also been generally obtuse, demonstrating ] on article and user talk, and since he edits medical articles, the name *is* misleading. He has demonstrated varying levels of understanding of Misplaced Pages processes, and doesn't seem to respond to either pings or direct posts to his talk page. ] (]) 15:38, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
::::Ah, I misread (which was possibly his intent, eh?). The famous Moyers doesn't have anything explicit to do with medical (or psychology) matters, does he? At least a quick perusal of his page didn't ring any warning bells for me compared to this editor's contribution areas. Since as of right now he can't or won't prove that his name really is Bill Moyers or that he is not actually the famous Bill Moyers, I'm restoring my disallow above. ]'']]]'' 21:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
*Another editor has questioned the use of the name on the user's talk page (]). Again he evades saying that his real name is Bill Moyers and the implication is that it is not. Also, he has failed to post to this discussion page despite my request. I suggest therefore that the account be blocked until and unless he states that he is using his real name or agrees to a name change. ] (]) 22:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
:* I don't know why no action has been taken on this; of course the real Bill Moyers is involved in health (look up his books on amazon.com). And I would post the claims Moyers has made about me all over Misplaced Pages, but I don't want to give them more attention than warranted. There is some apparent deliberate obtuseness here, and this fellow is getting traction via the use of this name. ] (]) 22:22, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
::* Someone needs to rewrite that article, then. ]'']]]'' 01:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
:::* {{ul|Ansh666}} Apparently: On the general apparent obtuseness, I encourage perusal of ] where (among other places) he has decided that I don't know the difference between a doctor and a nurse, I'm not qualified to work on the article since I don't own the DSM5, and I'm not qualified to work on the article because I'm not a Dr. Work on that article has ground to a halt, partly as a result of the IDHT on talk. ] (]) 01:50, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
He doesn't appear to have claimed that this is his real name. He says it is a common name, but isn't explicit. Maybe I am being overly pedantic, but I am inclined to block unless he claims it is his real name. -- ] 05:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

:I had not realized that Bill Moyers had edited a bestseller, ''Healing and the Mind'' (1993) as a companion to his PBS TV series. It makes the chance of confusion even greater. Ansh, he has not edited anything related to Bill Moyers AFAIK. ] (]) 08:22, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
'''Blocked'''. The situation seems rather ambiguous, since he's not precisely saying whether he's the famous guy, or whether he's someone else with the same name, or neither. I've blocked because of the ambiguity, and I've left him a set of simple instructions for resolving the situation. ] (]) 14:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
:You know, that section of the policy needs a minor re-write to allow for the possibility that the editor actually is "the well-known person of that name". There are no instructions about what a notable person editing under his or her real name should do. (And given ], can we really require that a person publicly post "Hi, I'm actually this famous person"?) ] (]) 19:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
::I also noticed that a sentence the first paragraph seemed to assume that a famous person would not use a real name; I've changed that sentence so it doesn't make that assumption. The second through fourth paragraphs give instructions that famous people can follow if they want to edit under their own names. A page on the person's Web site saying "on Misplaced Pages I use the account ''Foo''" doesn't seem like a serious outing problem, if someone has decided to use a real name. &mdash;] 21:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Yeh, it's a bit hard to 'out' someone who is using their real name. I would think that, because of possible COI issues, someone famous enough for an article editing under their own name ought to declare the fact. Especially if they are editing the article - and I can't really see many doing any other unrelated editing. ] (]) 19:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:Red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:RFCNbottom-->
</div>

Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024

Shortcuts
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • Purge page cache

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

Do NOT post here if:

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

  • has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
  • has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
  • is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList

Reports

Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.

Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
Category: