| Revision as of 22:15, 28 July 2014 editGranada2000 (talk | contribs)120 edits →Suzanne Marie Olsson← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:51, 30 September 2022 edit undoJtrrs0 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,600 editsm Please check the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/William Rawn AssociatesTag: Twinkle | ||
| (67 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC) | Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | <br style="clear: both;"/> | ||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| {{talkback|Piguy101|I have unreviewed a page you curated|ts=03:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 03:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)<br /> | |||
| == User:JapaneseKnoweed == | |||
| Hi, I recently added a page to Misplaced Pages entitled 'Japanese knotweed claims' which has recently been deleted for unambiguous advertising. Firstly I would like to apologise for transgressing the Misplaced Pages's code of conduct and would like to have another opportunity to write a short bio about Japanese Knotweed Claims again, hopefully the second time will be more acceptable. I was wondering if a) it would be ok to do so and what are the things I should avoid doing so the new page doesn't get deleted. b) what can be done to make things as if the page had never been created, i.e. how to remove the message explaining the deletion and removing the search result for 'Japanese knotweed claims' | |||
| ==simplicity.co.za== | |||
| Please let me know what to remove of this page to prevent deletion. | |||
| ⚫ | ] (]) |
||
| ==]== | |||
| I changed your proposed deletion to a speedy - db-ad Cheers ] (]) 08:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> Cheers, genuinely wasn't sure if that one would pass on a G11. ] (]) 10:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | == A kitten for you! == | ||
| Line 55: | Line 40: | ||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | <br style="clear: both;"/> | ||
| == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | |||
| Hello Dolescum. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''"world's larget pet fashion supplier" assertion, with refs that at least establish this as a real thing, and with some support for assertion - to ]? .''' Thank you. ] (]) 08:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Four sleepy kittehs for you! == | == Four sleepy kittehs for you! == | ||
| Line 65: | Line 48: | ||
| --] (]) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | --] (]) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==Proposed deletion of Shad Al-Sherif Pasha article== | |||
| ==Suzanne Marie Olsson== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ], which you have contributed to, is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy. Some reasons that make the article unsuitable are on ]. See, and if desired contribute to, deletion discussion at ]. ] (]) 15:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Mentioned in an AN filing == | |||
| Dolescum, | |||
| I mentioned you in an AN filing (not in a bad way either :) ). It's ]. <span style="text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em blue">]] </span> 11:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| Just be aware of edit warring on articles. When the other user reverting your tag for the third time the correct procedure would be to take it to ] rather than reverting their edits again. Just a heads up. I've blocked the other user for 24 hours in the interim. Cheers. ''']''' 08:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Glen}} Thanks. I generally try to avoid the drama boards, they look like a good way to get lynched... ] (]) 08:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Rochelle Gadd page == | |||
| Hi | |||
| I need help! I don't know what is meant by this is not the venue, go to DRV. Please advise? Thanks ] (]) 07:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring at Macedonia == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> I take no side in this edit war, but please start discussing instead.] (]) 10:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Just sayin == | |||
| You seem to be a bit biased against Golden Dawn and people who do not align to your liberalistic worldview. --<small style="font-size:85%;">] ]</small> 07:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> | |||
| ==Merger discussion for ]== | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing—]—has been '''proposed for ]''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in ]. Thank you. ] (]) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | --] (]) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Dolescum. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Dolescum. First , Thank you for your help editing the page I was creating about Suzanne Marie Olsson. I am aware that she had pages on Wiki previously- but eventually these got in to editing wars and she demanded the pages be deleted. This is because people would post a line or two from news articles-just like you did earlier today- and, depending on one's religious views- these segments of sentences could be taken out of context and make Olsson look really bad. That's the purpose behind these false planted articles and she has already explained that. So it is biased and unfair to keep inserting such info when it is known that the person disputes and denies these. Some people would publish these bad lines-("Olsson attempted to break in to the tomb and steal DNA","Olsson claims to be 59th descendant of jesus" et cetera) but not the explanations. If you read the article again, you will see that she had leading archaeologists on the team, and had the approval of the Chief Minister, whom she tells in her book she had been to his home several times. So there was no "break-in" and "Stealing DNA'. If you read further, she states that Laurence Gardner was the first to make this claim about her being descended from the Jesus bloodline. Then she went to investigate and came up with the idea for a DNA Project. She stated clearly that no one could make such claims without DNA or some solid proof. She was being responsible but not getting credit or the facts printed right. Most people just go by the news article without knowing the full background story, and this becomes very misleading. And frustrating. If you read further down the article, she clearly states that some news stories were "fed" to the press falsely and maliciously. I hope you understand. I realize this will probably happen again and again because anyone can edit at Wiki and keep making these same mistakes. I have asked for a speedy deletion of the page. That is best so we avoid misrepresenting anyone. I am so grateful for your help and interest. But it's just not fair to Olsson. Best the page is deleted....it was up for deletion anyway so no one will care. I really do appreciate your understanding! I'll start a new wiki page and hope you will be around to help me again. ] (]) 06:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Granada2000] (]) 06:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 --> | |||
| == January 2018 == | |||
| :See note at ] ] (]) 06:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for . </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| {{User:Beedlebrox}}, assuming you get this ping, I was watching your contribs and assumed you were ignoring me to decline the request. If you'd be kind enough to remove my talk page privs, that would be wonderful. ] (]) 23:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Done}}. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==New message from Jtrrs0== | |||
| Dolescum- No. You cannot re-insert the deletions I made. Just because you find things online does not make them true or appropriate to insert into articles=- especially about living people who have already denied those statements and given the explanations for how they got into newspapers in the first place. Olsson entered Pakistan and Kashmir as a "facilitator" - someone who organized others to do the work. Read her book. She never "broke in to local tombs" She never even excavated anything! She never "hurt local muslim feelings"...those comments were fed to the press by a local man who got angry with her because he wanted more baksheesh...she has already explained this to most everyone' satisfaction. I am sorry I ever started this page and I hope it will be deleted soon. Meanwhile, I will delete everything that I know is false or planted information leaked to the press and the Internet- it's all in her book. If I have to quote page and line every time, then I will because I have the book right here..much easier and less confusing for the article to just delete it..I hope you understand. Please dont take this personal..it is only intended to not hurt the feelings of a living person who knows these statements to be false. And thanks again for all your help. You are much appreciated. ] (]) 22:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Granada2000] (]) 22:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] You are invited to join the discussion at ].  Hi, I noticed you've contributed to an article I've nominated for deletion at AfD and thought you may have views. ] (]) 17:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)<!-- ] --> | |||
Latest revision as of 17:51, 30 September 2022
I dislike the vast bulk of wikipedians, so please go away unless you have pictures of adorable kittens.
A kitten for you!
_by_Ron.jpg)
i understand i was only experamening sorry for all your trouble
Zira456 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
A kitten for you!
Dolescum, Here is an adorable kitten. Signed, the new user that created Rodli, Beskar, Krueger and Pletcher, S.C.
Wikinnikinnic 01:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
And here is one unrelated to the bicolor twins.
Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for the archiving help at Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate.
Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Four sleepy kittehs for you!
So I herd you liek kittens, etc, etc. 
--Shirt58 (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Shad Al-Sherif Pasha article
The article Shad Al-Sherif Pasha, which you have contributed to, is being considered for deletion in accordance with Misplaced Pages's deletion policy. Some reasons that make the article unsuitable are on its Talk page. See, and if desired contribute to, deletion discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shad Al-Sherif Pasha. Pol098 (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Mentioned in an AN filing
Dolescum,
I mentioned you in an AN filing (not in a bad way either :) ). It's here, just in case you wanted to add anything in . KoshVorlon R.I.P Leonard Nimoy "Live Long and Prosper" 11:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
Just be aware of edit warring on articles. When the other user reverting your tag for the third time the correct procedure would be to take it to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring rather than reverting their edits again. Just a heads up. I've blocked the other user for 24 hours in the interim. Cheers. Glen 08:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Glen: Thanks. I generally try to avoid the drama boards, they look like a good way to get lynched... Dolescum (talk) 08:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Rochelle Gadd page
Hi
I need help! I don't know what is meant by this is not the venue, go to DRV. Please advise? Thanks Chrispanto (talk) 07:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring at Macedonia
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I take no side in this edit war, but please start discussing instead.Jeppiz (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Just sayin
You seem to be a bit biased against Golden Dawn and people who do not align to your liberalistic worldview. --Sιgε |д･) 07:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Ali-Illahism
An article that you have been involved in editing—Ali-Illahism—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
--MiguelMadeira (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Dolescum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN 23:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
User:Beedlebrox, assuming you get this ping, I was watching your contribs and assumed you were ignoring me to decline the request. If you'd be kind enough to remove my talk page privs, that would be wonderful. Dolescum (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Done. New message from Jtrrs0
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/William Rawn Associates. Hi, I noticed you've contributed to an article I've nominated for deletion at AfD and thought you may have views. Jtrrs0 (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)