Misplaced Pages

User talk:ER MD: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:43, 3 July 2006 editIrishguy (talk | contribs)45,851 edits restored← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:49, 22 July 2006 edit undoER MD (talk | contribs)872 edits revert--I moved to a different profile and this one is no longer active 
(69 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Stop==
Stop ! --] 21:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
::that paragraph was is duplicated in the next section. ] 22:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
::Also removed propaganda from youtube(a great source of information if I've ever heard on one)--not even a real discussion on shock and awe--simply a criticism of iraq war--propaganda needs to be removed. ] 00:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
:::It EXPLICITLY is talking about shock and awe, it is explicitly relevant to this article. I dont care if you label it propaganda, its the other sides arguements. --] 10:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
::::Alrighty, I will insert some POV into the intro and let us see if you tolerate the "other side's arguments." ] 19:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages or sections with blank content. It is considered ]. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.<!-- Template:Blank2 --> The edit I refer to is . <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 04:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages or sections with blank content. It is considered ]. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.<!-- Template:Blank2 --> Also, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. That, too, goes against policy. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 18:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

==Question==

Hi. I have a couple of quick questions about one of the articles you're working on, if you have just a second. You can send me an email through Misplaced Pages: ] Thanks! ] 22:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. <!-- Template:Wr (second level warning) --> --]<sup> '''(''']''')'''</sup> 23:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

==Removing warnings==

Don't do it. Simple as that. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:11 (]) </font>

==3RR==

Doesn't apply when one is dealing with vandalism. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:21 (]) </font>

:No, I'm not. And I've added you to the ] for your behavior. --] 08:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
: ] This is your '''last warning'''. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered ''']'''. You ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages and your talk page will be ''protected'' from editing if you do it again. <!-- Template:Wr2 (final level warning) --> ]]<sup>(])</sup> 08:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

::And by the way, editing without registering and editing other's pages is not against policy. --] 08:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

:::You are an idiot. I am trying to remove DUMB comments by uninformed people, probably teenagers with their stupdi comments. Why the hell do you even care? I got a fucking violation for trying to clean up the shit on this page by morons. ] 08:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
::: Warnings aren't "dumb comments". And little notes like these<sup class=plainlinks></sup> and what you wrote up above will got you blocked. <div style="clear: both"></div>{{{1|] }}}'''You have been temporarily ] from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages.''' Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of ] are considered ]. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. <!-- Template:Test5 --> ]]<sup>(])</sup> 08:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

==Okay, how about this:==

Instead of ''deleting'' the messages, make an ''archive'' of them. Otherwise, they have to stay on this page. --] 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

::There is nothing on this page worth archiving. Its all junk. ] 19:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

:::Yeah, but everytime you remove it somebody else will put it back. That's the way it works. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:06 (]) </font>

::::according to the talk page: "Others delete comments after they have responded to them." I've responded to the comments and I have opted to delete them. My warning is on deleting entries that have no value. And my block was for deleting unimportant stuff and getting pissed off at people for puting false information on the talk page. ] 20:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

:::::No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (]) </font>

::::::I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the public opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), parts of euthanasia, topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ] 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

:::::::Actually, '''it looks like you deleted it from your talk page'''! If you are deleting stuff from your page, I'm going to clean up mine. Thanks... ] 20:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

::::::::As for warnings, from my understanding of how wiki works, the administrators have a tool to see how many times that you have been blocked. As for me, I've been blocked 3 times prior (because I get pissed off dealing with not so intelligent people--go read my history with 4 people who claimed that I was not a doctor even when my IP prointed to the hospitals that I worked at--they claimed that I hacked into hospital IP to "falsely" claim that I was a doctor) to getting now blocked 2 times for trying to clean up my talk page. ] 21:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

:::::::::Finally, the talk page states: "Furthermore WP:VAND states: Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism. '''It is generally acceptable to remove misplaced vandalism tags''', as long as the reasoning is solid."
::::::::::I have not vandalized any pages except for nrcprm2026 user page prior to that user getting a permanent ban for his behavior. I have contributed to wiki--see above articles--and I am getting real tired of defending myself against baseless accusations. Is there a way that I can tell people not to write on my user talk page? ] 21:39, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:49, 22 July 2006