| Revision as of 07:28, 3 August 2014 editCOD T 3 (talk | contribs)617 edits →Blue Army RFC← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:24, 7 August 2014 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,963 edits →Arbitration enforcement sanction: new section | ||
| (99 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Arbitration enforcement sanction == | |||
| == July 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 20:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=] from all articles (including talk pages and subpages) related to Eastern Europe}} | |||
| == Blue Army RFC == | |||
| You have been sanctioned per . | |||
| I have reviewed my closure of the RFC. The RFC was poorly formed and was not straightforward to close. On the one hand, I am not willing to change the wording of my closure. On the other hand, I am willing to insert a properly formed RFC with Survey and Threaded Discussion sections and leave it open for 30 days, or to have another editor do that. Is that satisfactory? ] (]) 13:56, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::You asked me to change the wording of the close. I considered doing that, although it violates the statement in the box that the discussion is closed, as per ]. I concluded that either the close can be left as is, or a new RFC is in order. Your call. ] (]) 14:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::By the way, ] is in ] as usually noted. This means that ArbCom ] are available for disruptive editing. If you think that another editor is being disruptive or tendentious, you can apply the discretionary sanctions warning to their talk page, <nowiki> {{subst:Ds/alert|ee}} </nowiki>. ] (]) 14:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Do you want a new RFC, or do you want to leave alone, or do you want to request closure review at ]? I don't plan to change the wording of the close. ] (]) 14:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::], at this point I will go ahead and request a ]. --] (]) 07:28, 3 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| == Discretionary sanctions == | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 14:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| }} | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ] (]), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 16:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].] (]) 19:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 7 August 2014
Arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
Topic ban from all articles (including talk pages and subpages) related to Eastern Europe
You have been sanctioned per this AE request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)