| Revision as of 15:14, 11 August 2014 view sourceSphilbrick (talk | contribs)Administrators178,550 edits →Arbitration case request declined: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Neotarf: User request within own user space ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (268 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| {{noindex}} | |||
| |algo = old(24h) | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Neotarf/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| Subpages: | |||
| *] Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the ''Signpost'' during the 2013 arbitration cycle | |||
| *]:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections | |||
| *]: Enables edit counter | |||
| *]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | |||
| *]:Some notes | |||
| *] | |||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| == Query, and request == | |||
| Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? you don't really work on articles any more. edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as , without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --] (]) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration case request declined == | |||
| An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found , may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --]] 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015