Revision as of 01:44, 12 August 2014 view source184.66.160.91 (talk) retired users don't spend all day stirring up shit. Revert if you are using some definition of "retired" I am not familiar with← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Neotarf: User request within own user space ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
(261 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
{{banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
|counter = 1 | |||
{{noindex}} | |||
|algo = old(24h) | |||
| minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
| minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
|archive = User talk:Neotarf/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
Subpages: | |||
*] Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the ''Signpost'' during the 2013 arbitration cycle | |||
*]:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections | |||
*]: Enables edit counter | |||
*]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | |||
*]:Some notes | |||
*] (including link to discussion about "retired" banner) | |||
*] Wikimania civility speech, August 2014 | |||
== Query, and request == | |||
Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? you don't really work on articles any more. edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as , without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --] (]) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Responded on your talk page. Regards, —] (]) 22:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration case request declined == | |||
An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found , may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --]] 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015