Revision as of 20:11, 5 July 2006 editWing Nut (talk | contribs)900 edits →Book Summary: Did Brock detail intolerance toward people, or ideological opposition to homosexuality as a lifestyle?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:57, 28 April 2024 edit undoSimLibrarian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users123,874 editsm rm contractionTag: Visual edit | ||
(101 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|2002 book by David Brock}} | |||
⚫ | |||
{{Infobox book | |||
| name = Blinded by the Right | |||
| image = Blindedbytheright.jpg | |||
| caption = First edition | |||
| author = ] | |||
| title_orig = | |||
| translator = | |||
| illustrator = | |||
| cover_artist = | |||
| country = | |||
| language = | |||
| series = | |||
| subject = | |||
| genre = ] | |||
| publisher = Crown | |||
| pub_date = 2002 | |||
| english_pub_date = | |||
| media_type = | |||
| pages = | |||
| isbn = 1-4000-4728-5 | |||
| oclc = | |||
| dewey = | |||
| congress = | |||
| preceded_by = ] | |||
| followed_by = ] | |||
}} | |||
⚫ | '''''Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative''''' is a 2002 book written by former ] ] ], detailing his departure from the conservative movement. It is also the story of his ] as a ] man. | ||
⚫ | The subtitle alludes to ]'s '']'', which helped define the modern conservative movement in the |
||
⚫ | In the book, he states that he visited ]s with ] and other conservatives. The title alludes to the ] song "]", while the subtitle alludes to ]'s '']'', which helped define the modern conservative movement in the United States. | ||
==Book Summary== | |||
{{spoiler}} | |||
⚫ | Brock recalls his days at ] and how he was turned off by hecklers at a speech by then United States ambassador to the United Nations, ]. Brock's main attraction to ] was his disdain for ]. | ||
==Synopsis== | |||
⚫ | After college, Brock moved with his then |
||
⚫ | Brock recalls his days at the ], and how he was turned off by hecklers at a speech by then United States ambassador to the United Nations, ]. Brock's main attraction to ] was his disdain for ]. | ||
⚫ | After college, Brock moved with his then-partner (called "Andrew" to conceal his identity) to Washington, D.C. In D.C., Brock worked for '']'' and '']''. Brock claims while he was working for those publications he thought he was doing honest journalism, but later stated that he had never corroborated his facts. | ||
⚫ | While working for |
||
⚫ | While working for ''The American Spectator'', he wrote an article on ], which he later expanded into '']'', a book that made him popular in the conservative movement. Brock would later say that many of the details he used were false. | ||
⚫ | After ] |
||
⚫ | After ] was elected, Brock was assigned to write a story, later dubbed ], about four Arkansas state troopers who held a grudge against ]. He claims that the troopers made up stories about affairs that could never be corroborated. Brock was given assurances that the troopers would not get paid for telling their stories. He later discovered he was deceived, and that the troopers had been paid by ], who bankrolled ''The American Spectator'' and the ], a secret project to discredit Clinton. | ||
⚫ | Brock made sure to conceal the identities of the women identified by the troopers, with the exception of one woman named Paula. Brock thought that by not revealing her last name, it would be enough to conceal her identity. Brock did not take into account that ] is small city. Eventually her identity would be revealed as ], which |
||
⚫ | Brock made sure to conceal the identities of the women identified by the troopers, with the exception of one woman named "Paula". Brock thought that by not revealing her last name, it would be enough to conceal her identity. Brock did not take into account that ] is a small city. Eventually her identity would be revealed as ], which led to her civil lawsuit against Bill Clinton. | ||
Following the Troopergate story, Brock wrote a book about ], '']''. Unlike the Anita Hill book, Brock decided not to put anything in the book that he could not corroborate. The book was not as critical of Hillary Clinton as it was promised to be. Brock claims that conservatives planned on the book being so damning as to influence the outcome of the 1996 presidential election. | Following the Troopergate story, Brock wrote a book about ], '']''. Unlike the Anita Hill book, Brock decided not to put anything in the book that he could not corroborate. The book was not as critical of Hillary Clinton as it was promised to be. Brock claims that conservatives planned on the book being so damning as to influence the outcome of the 1996 presidential election. | ||
''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham'' was the beginning of |
''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham'' was the beginning of Brock's falling out with the conservative movement. The issue that forced him to leave the conservative movement was the movement's intolerance towards ]. Brock had reluctantly come out of the closet, prior to writing the Hillary Clinton book, and believes this contributed to his being shunned by many in the movement. | ||
Brock voted for ] in |
Brock voted for ] in 2000, the first time he voted since he voted for ] in 1984. During the period in which he did not vote, he had two rationalizations for his non-voting: | ||
* He believed that his vote |
* He believed that his vote did not count in liberal ] | ||
* He believed that not voting allowed him to stay neutral | * He believed that not voting allowed him to stay neutral | ||
Brock proclaimed that the latter rationalization was bogus, as he was not neutral during that time period. | Brock proclaimed that the latter rationalization was bogus, as he was not neutral during that time period. | ||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
⚫ | * April 26, 2002 | ||
===Media Appearance=== | |||
*. (VIDEO) ] -section starts at 3 mins 33 secs in and ends at 6 mins and 23 secs | |||
⚫ | * April 26, 2002 |
||
===Positive Reviews=== | |||
* at ] | * at ] | ||
===Negative Reviews=== | |||
* - LA Weekly review. | * - LA Weekly review. | ||
* in ] by ] | * in ] by ]; Brock's response at the bottom of the page. | ||
** | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:57, 28 April 2024
2002 book by David BrockFirst edition | |
Author | David Brock |
---|---|
Genre | Non-fiction |
Publisher | Crown |
Publication date | 2002 |
ISBN | 1-4000-4728-5 |
Preceded by | The Seduction of Hillary Rodham |
Followed by | The Republican Noise Machine |
Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative is a 2002 book written by former conservative journalist David Brock, detailing his departure from the conservative movement. It is also the story of his coming out as a gay man.
In the book, he states that he visited gay bars with Matt Drudge and other conservatives. The title alludes to the Bruce Springsteen song "Blinded by the Light", while the subtitle alludes to Barry Goldwater's The Conscience of a Conservative, which helped define the modern conservative movement in the United States.
Synopsis
Brock recalls his days at the University of California, Berkeley, and how he was turned off by hecklers at a speech by then United States ambassador to the United Nations, Jeane Kirkpatrick. Brock's main attraction to conservatism was his disdain for communism.
After college, Brock moved with his then-partner (called "Andrew" to conceal his identity) to Washington, D.C. In D.C., Brock worked for The Washington Times and The American Spectator. Brock claims while he was working for those publications he thought he was doing honest journalism, but later stated that he had never corroborated his facts.
While working for The American Spectator, he wrote an article on Anita Hill, which he later expanded into The Real Anita Hill, a book that made him popular in the conservative movement. Brock would later say that many of the details he used were false.
After Bill Clinton was elected, Brock was assigned to write a story, later dubbed Troopergate, about four Arkansas state troopers who held a grudge against Bill Clinton. He claims that the troopers made up stories about affairs that could never be corroborated. Brock was given assurances that the troopers would not get paid for telling their stories. He later discovered he was deceived, and that the troopers had been paid by Richard Mellon Scaife, who bankrolled The American Spectator and the Arkansas Project, a secret project to discredit Clinton.
Brock made sure to conceal the identities of the women identified by the troopers, with the exception of one woman named "Paula". Brock thought that by not revealing her last name, it would be enough to conceal her identity. Brock did not take into account that Little Rock is a small city. Eventually her identity would be revealed as Paula Jones, which led to her civil lawsuit against Bill Clinton.
Following the Troopergate story, Brock wrote a book about Hillary Clinton, The Seduction of Hillary Rodham. Unlike the Anita Hill book, Brock decided not to put anything in the book that he could not corroborate. The book was not as critical of Hillary Clinton as it was promised to be. Brock claims that conservatives planned on the book being so damning as to influence the outcome of the 1996 presidential election.
The Seduction of Hillary Rodham was the beginning of Brock's falling out with the conservative movement. The issue that forced him to leave the conservative movement was the movement's intolerance towards homosexuality. Brock had reluctantly come out of the closet, prior to writing the Hillary Clinton book, and believes this contributed to his being shunned by many in the movement.
Brock voted for Al Gore in 2000, the first time he voted since he voted for Ronald Reagan in 1984. During the period in which he did not vote, he had two rationalizations for his non-voting:
- He believed that his vote did not count in liberal Washington, D.C.
- He believed that not voting allowed him to stay neutral
Brock proclaimed that the latter rationalization was bogus, as he was not neutral during that time period.
References
External links
- CNN Crossfire April 26, 2002
- BBC documentary. (VIDEO) The Power of Nightmares -section starts at 3 mins 33 secs in and ends at 6 mins and 23 secs
- A review by James M. Kehl at Democratic Underground
- Blinded by the Fight - The miseducation of David Brock, snot-faced warrior for the right - LA Weekly review.
- David Brock, Liar: A lifelong habit proves hard to break. in slate.com by Timothy Noah; Brock's response at the bottom of the page.