User talk:Middle 8: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 09:23, 1 September 2014 editMiddle 8 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users8,217 edits →Excessive complaints and misleading use of evidence: typo, and e.g.← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:24, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk \| contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery
(242 intermediate revisions by 33 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{NOINDEX\|visible = no}}		{{NOINDEX\|visible = no}}
			* <big>'''Welcome to my usertalk page!'''</big> Please ] and see  ] on my userpage.
	{{Template:User Scientist}}
			* <big>'''If you leave a message here, I will reply here'''</big> unless you state a different preference or ping me. It's much easier for me to keep conversations in one place.
	{{Template:User acupuncturist}}
	{{User:Ashley Y/Userbox/Humanist}}
	{{Template:User Autistic rights}}

			* '''Privacy note: Do not post any personal information about me on Misplaced Pages''' beyond what I disclose on this and my other user pages. See ''']''' and ], which is taken as seriously as ], as it should be.
	{{Break\|3}}

			That said... let's get high! On the ol' hierarchy...
			<br>

			]

	{{Break\|1}}
	'''Privacy note: Do not post any personal information about me on Misplaced Pages''' beyond what I disclose on this and my other user pages. See ''']''' and ], which is taken as seriously as ], as it should be.
	<hr>
	'''If you leave a message here, I will reply here''' unless you state a different preference. It's much easier for me to keep conversations in one place.
	<hr>
	{{cot\|title=userpage boilerplate for mirror sites}}		{{cot\|title=userpage boilerplate for mirror sites}}
	{{userpage}}		{{userpage}}
	{{cob}}		{{cob}}
			'''<big>]''' (personal list)</big><br>
	{{Break\|1}}
	''']''' ''(as yet incomplete; check the history)''		''']''' ''(as yet incomplete; check the history)''
			</center>
	{{Break\|2}}
	__TOC__		__TOC__

			== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
	== Acupuncture and Biomedical Correlate ==
	:Review request for a review on the acupuncture page, first paragraph. See the Talk page, "Physical correlates of acupoints" section and "Physical correlates of acupoints, Part Two." I am concerned that an ethnocentric bias on the part of editors has prevented a simple edit. The editors stand by some very shaky references and will not accept references from the most prestigious universities in the world, including those in China. At issue, the current article reads inaccurately, "Scientific investigation has not found any histological or physiological correlates for traditional Chinese concepts such as qi, meridians and acupuncture points," and yet I have sourced numerous peer reviewed studies from reputable sources showing MRI brain activity, hemodynamic and oxygen pressure correlates. Please review, I think you will find the research interesting. ] (]) 13:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
	::Thanks for the note; I've been very busy and only read it just now. I will have a look, but can't get into anything very intense for another week or so. But I will have a close look. This is an important area and we need to get it right. --] (]) 16:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
	:::Note to self and {{U\|Acuhealth}} aka TriumvirateProtean: believe it or not, I haven't forgotten about this, which is why I didn't archive it. Besides being occupied elsewhere, I've been waiting for good sources: not just studies, but reviews (per MEDRS). Looks like ] now. --] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 20:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2019\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	==Note to self re refs==
	Some stuff from {{U\|Puhlaa}} to follow up.


			If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
	And, from Puhlaa's post to ]:
			</td></tr>
	:If you feel so inclined, here are some secondary sources that could be used to add relevant text to :
			</table>
	*
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=926750357 -->
	* Ahn 2007
			==Concern regarding ]==
	* Huang et al 2012
			] Hello, Middle 8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again or ] that it be moved to your userspace.
	* Kawakita et al. 2006
	* Cheng 2009
	--] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 20:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
	:::Hi Middle8, I think that you would also be interested in the that was recently published by the US Dept. of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service. Best regards ] (]) 22:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
	::::Very interesting; it's a first-rate MEDRS and some if its findings diverge considerably from Cochrane's, usually but not always in the (+) direction, but also with more detail: they chart evidence according to both magnitude of effect and strength of evidence. Naively, I guess the different conclusions are no more and no less than results of different approaches to meta-analysis; I see no reason to suspect bias from this group (as opposed to, e.g., the NCCAM). Surprising. I'm sure some of the anti-acu POV-pushers will freak (yes, POV-pushing occurs from more than one side with alt-med, imagine that), but we follow the sources, wherever they take us. Thanks, this is a really good and interesting source. --] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 08:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
	::::There were several reviews I posted last year at acupuncture and DJ was blocking any attempt at including reviews that showed efficacy with QG being the henchman. This source is authoritative and excellent presents the data. While considering the sources, we should also consider if there are 'outlier' findings, i.e. conclusions that haven't been reproduced elsewhere. Ernst, Colqhoun, Novella and other sources come to mind. I'll add a few reviews to your list when i have some time. I agree, we should follow the sources, but we also need to discern the noise from the signal. ] (]) 02:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

			If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it.
	== Notability of authors ==

			Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
	I see that one of the arguments against Wang is that he's not notable, and that Colquhoun and Novella are. But if one searches Google Scholar, there are very few results for SP Novella. There are many for D Colquhoun and for Shu-Ming Wang. By that measure, Wang is as notable as Colquhoun and Novella. But as you say, MEDRS doesn't say anything about notability but does give guidance regarding editorials. ] (]) 10:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
			: --] <small>(])] • ]</small> 18:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
	:Good catch. And MEDRS also says "experts in the relevant field", and that's the crux of it; one can be very much an expert but not at all well-known. QG may be confusing expertise with notability. The skeptics will hate this, but notability in the skeptic world doesn't (necessarily) confer academic expertise. Peer review exists for a reason.... that said, I think Novella is fine here; it's just that Wang is more than fine. --] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 11:11, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
			==Your draft article, ]==
			]

			Hello, Middle 8. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
	== Thank you ==

			In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can ]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
	Thank you for being a voice of calm and reason over at ]. It is always a pleasure to edit with you. - ] <small>(])</small> 20:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
	:Likewise, 100%. I feel much more inclined to edit knowing you're around (the same for Jytdog and Brangifer). I've had to take breaks from the article now and again .... some extended ones over the last year or two to recalibrate my own NPOV (I could get pretty ], in retrospect, a reputation that's hard to shake), and sometimes because the hyperbole and obtuseness become intolerable. But when there is level-headedness, editing can be pretty fun. --] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 20:45, 14 August 2014 (UTC) <small>edited: ], not ] 16:40, 18 August 2014 (UTC)</small>

			Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 04:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
	==Excessive complaints and misleading use of evidence==
			:Fine by me, ]. FWIW, although I created the article, it was not as a draft (I think it might've been a redirect ]). It was significantly changed by other editors, thereby bringing about the current situation. They're the ones who would benefit from the above message, FWIW -- it does no good here (but no harm either, of course; no worries). Kudos for helping maintain WP, and happy editing! --] <small>(])] • ]</small> 08:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
	This comment -- a very belated one, given the diffs involved -- regards misleading evidence presented by QuackGuru regarding my editing. I'm asking a few editors to have a look: {{U\|QuackGuru}} himself and {{U\|Kww}}; and {{U\|John}}, {{U\|Jayaguru-Shishya}} and {{U\|BullRangifer\|Brangifer}}, who commented on this issue earlier at John's user talk (]).

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	'''tl;dr: QG provided some diffs about me that made it look like I was POV-pushing, but I can and do show that those diffs, taken alone, are deceptive. These are part of a larger pattern of unwarranted complaints that involve being less than candid. Attacks based on selective evidence unfairly shift the burden to the accused and shouldn't be tolerated.''' Evidence follows.
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2021\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	QuackGuru posted the following at Kww's user talk:
	{{talkquote\|text=On two separate occasions Middle 8 added the word "characterized" to the lede and on two separate occasions Middle 8 added the word "described" to the lede.

			If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
	I think this can be reported to AE or I can let you handle this situation. You wanted me to run things like this before I make a report.\|by=QuackGuru\|ts=04:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)\|oldid=615652596}}
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1056563210 -->

			== Hi. ==
	Kww replied:
	{{talkquote\|text=It's not a 3RR violation. I will discuss it with Middle 8.\|by=Kww\|ts=05:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)\|oldid=615655698}}

			--] (]) 23:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
	To recap, QG chooses four diffs and depicts them as POV pushing. But QG himself was the first to add the supposedly biased "characterized" to the text at hand, while I was the first to add the safely-neutral "stated" . He didn't mention that when he contrasted the two words. QG is very detail-oriented, so his overlooking these is surprising. But they tell a much different story, and omitting them is consistent with his being overeager to depict my editing as bad. It's time for that to stop. (I do apologize sincerely if I am wrong and/or straying into ABF, but -- cf. the duck test -- I think it's more likely than not that the omissions were deliberate. He's making way too many complaints, and they're almost entirely baseless, so to make them appear substantive needs to stretch and bend the truth.)

			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	Attacking other editors with selective evidence is wrong, and hard to refute. And now I have to do exactly that, to show that my complaint has merit -- see how selective attacks seem to shift the burden, and take up the target's time? (A lot of time in this case; upwards of 12-18 hours.) FWIW:

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	{{cot\|pertinent mainspace changes during the time of my supposedly bad four edits}}
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2022\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	* My first "bad edit" of : {{tq\|"TCM has been described as "fraught with pseudoscience."}} I ], and nobody commented there, nor did anyone revert it. I find no further mention of this passage on talk in the span of time between this edit and my final one on July 4th.

			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	* Following a small edit war (24 May ) over multiple sentences, QG changed the wording to {{tq\|"TCM is characterized as largely pseudoscience..."}} . This was also removed but quickly restored by Doc James .

			</div>
	* A few days later Herbxue (using an edit by QG accepted at Talk:TCM) reworded as {{tq\|"''Nature'' found TCM to be largely pseudoscience..."}} . Then an IP changed that to {{tq\|"According to one editorial in Nature magazine, TCM is characterized as largely pseudoscience,..."}}. . Doc James amended this awkward construction to {{tq\|"According to an editorial in Nature magazine, TCM is largely pseudoscience..."}}, and QuackGuru reverted back to his own (via Herbxue) preceding wording: . That stuck for a couple of weeks.
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 -->

			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	* Then toward the end of June, I changed the wording to {{tq\|"An editorial in ''Nature'' stated that TCM is largely pseudoscience..."}} and then a day later to {{tq\|"An editorial in ''Nature'' characterized TCM as largely pseudoscience..."}} (, my 2nd "bad edit"). That stuck for a few days, and then QG reverted to my "stated" wording . That stuck for a few more days. About a week later, I reverted back to my "characterized" wording (my third "bad edit", ). <small>(Note: I didn't even realize I was reverting or being reverted at the time, and I doubt QG or anyone else did either, unless the edits were closely spaced. There were about 200(!) edits to be mainspace and talk space during this time, including sockpuppet edits and a reverting of same . But still no talk page discussion of this passage at all, as far as I can tell. People just weren't paying attention.)</small>

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	* Finally, that "third bad edit" of mine above -- the only reason for which was to vary up the prose, with a word QG and Doc James once accepted -- was reverted , with an ES ''"Reverted non neutral change characterised as neutral"'' <small>(plus a couple of that QG and Doc James were oddly spared)</small>. Following BRD, I ] and address that editor's objections; hence {{tq\|"An editorial in ''Nature'' characterized TCM as largely pseudoscience..."}} (, my fourth and last "bad edit"). And for the first time since ] on May 12, ] ensued, and consensus at last began to emerge. I didn't edit that section of the article any further.
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
	{{cob}}
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2023\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	What the history shows is gradual "drift": changes by multiple editors, with consensus yet to emerge. QG's selective evidence and comments only made it seem that my edits were improper.

			</div>
	QG's use of those diffs against me is opportunistic and underhanded, and the string of complaints (mentioned above, i.e. ) is overdone (and arguably harassment). Those complaints are also chock-full of further misleading use of evidence (e.g. , which Kww ). If I were making so many bad edits I'd have a pretty big block log by now.
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 -->

			== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
	Attacks based on misleading evidence are unfair time-sinks to those targeted. This shouldn't be allowed to happen again.

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	OK! Happier editing. --] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 21:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2024\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	:Here's another, very simple instance: QuackGuru saying ArbCom disrectionary sanctions on pseudoscience. As evidence for his assertion he cites , again selectively, because (a) I immediately followed up that diff with , and (b) both QuackGuru and I are veteran editors of pseudoscience topics and have been well aware of Arbcom sanctions for a long time. I'm really getting tired of the ] and misrepresentation of the record. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 05:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
	::And selective use of a newspaper quote at article talk: ] --] <small>(] • ])</small> 09:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
	==Fields Medal==

			</div>
	Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			</div>
	:{{replyto\|Rezameyqani}} Hi, I wish I could help, but I've only edited that page once or twice and am not familiar with the background, and can't help you. If I were you I'd ask at the talk page of whoever blocked you, or at ]. Best of luck to you. --] <small>(] • ])</small> 08:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 -->

Latest revision as of 00:24, 19 November 2024

Welcome to my usertalk page! Please AGF and see § Collaboration & accomodation on my userpage.
If you leave a message here, I will reply here unless you state a different preference or ping me. It's much easier for me to keep conversations in one place.

Privacy note: Do not post any personal information about me on Misplaced Pages beyond what I disclose on this and my other user pages. See User:Middle 8/Privacy and WP:OUTING, which is taken as seriously as WP:BLP, as it should be.

That said... let's get high! On the ol' hierarchy...

userpage boilerplate for mirror sites

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Middle_8.

Editing tips (personal list)
Archives (as yet incomplete; check the history)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Better Call Saul characters

Hello, Middle 8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Better Call Saul characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

noted --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 18:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Better Call Saul characters

Hello, Middle 8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Better Call Saul characters".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 04:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Fine by me, Liz. FWIW, although I created the article, it was not as a draft (I think it might've been a redirect here). It was significantly changed by other editors, thereby bringing about the current situation. They're the ones who would benefit from the above message, FWIW -- it does no good here (but no harm either, of course; no worries). Kudos for helping maintain WP, and happy editing! --Middle 8 (s)talk • privacy 08:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi.

My answer. --The Explaner (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)