| Revision as of 23:11, 15 September 2014 editDanntm (talk | contribs)3,251 edits Delete← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:23, 13 July 2024 edit undoJPxG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators118,942 editsm fix substed afd courtesy-blank template from "The result of this discussion was" to "The result was" because scripts that parse AfD outcomes choke on the former (via WP:JWB) | ||
| (119 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| ''The result was '''keep'''. The actual discussion has been ] but can still be accessed by following the "history" link at the top of the page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). <span style="color:red">'''No further edits should be made to this page.'''</span>'' __NOINDEX__<!-- inserted using Template:afd-privacy --></div> | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| :{{la|Danièle Watts}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | |||
| :({{Find sources|Danièle Watts}}) | |||
| Film/TV actress with only minor roles. Mostly covered in the news lately, for a minor story, that's likely to result in ]. (Some editors, who added hearsay from poor sources, have added that she is "best known" for this.) Specifically, for being handcuffed by the LAPD while with her partner, . —] 20:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Strong Keep'''. As I tried to explain on the talkpage, I created this stub because she has acted on film and television. She is "best known" (not necessarily famous) for acting in '']'', because it was an '''internationally distributed''' film. She has also appeared on many television series, which are also '''shown internationally'''. I added the "incident" to the "personal life" section because it is a minor event (indeed, an incident), but it did get '''international coverage''' in the press (for example, in France). I believe she is '''notable as an actress''', regardless of the incident. I would recommend keeping this page and hopefully expanding it, as it is a mere stub. When/where was she born, etc.] (]) 20:52, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's up to you to establish her notability as an actress by adding sources and content. She doesn't seem notable to a non-expert, looking at articles like '']''. The international coverage of the police incident isn't relevant to her notability, as it's just coverage of an ], and not a very significant one at all. —] 21:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes, upon creating the article, I added references for her acting work on Django but also several other films and television series, which are watched by millions of people globally. It's also a stub, which means it is a work in process which should be expanded.] (]) 21:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::To establish that she's notable, you need to add sources with coverage of her career, and a bit of content too. All the more so, with the police incident and negative coverage of her. —] 21:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The article is fully sourced, but it is a stub. Help us expand it with more referenced info if you want. Otherwise, hopefully others will expand the page too. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort, and a work in progress. Don't tell me what to do or try to start a fight. I also don't think her page should be deleted because she is black--she is an actress seen on screen by millions of people--no need to debase her work. Thank you.] (]) 21:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Assume good faith, please! I brought this to AfD because this is person who didn't seem notable (and still doesn't), and because the article has little more than the police incident, so it needs more scrutiny to ensure we aren't providing inappropriate, negative coverage of the subject. I guess race, perhaps, means it's more likely we'll get vandalism/POV-pushing. It's quite OK for the article to be a stub, and lack detail, but it needs to establish the subject's notability in some way. Adding more coverage of the police incident, because it has mentions of her acting career, doesn't help with that. —] 23:10, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Delete''': Famous for a police incident in which she may or not not have been accused of being a prostitute. A minor role in a film does not equate to notability. ] (]) 21:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::You fail to acknowledge she has also acted on many television series, which are watched by millions of people globally.] (]) 21:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::You fail to acknowledge that these were all minor roles. ] (]) 21:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' ] requires "significant roles in multiple films, television shows...." As she has mostly has minor roles, she has yet to met WP:NACTOR yet. ] does not necessarily change that.-- ] <sup>]</sup> <sub>]</sub> 23:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC) | |||