Revision as of 03:47, 18 September 2014 editNulla Taciti (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,543 edits + reference← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:14, 23 December 2024 edit undo118.179.97.190 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Disambiguation links added | ||
(380 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Radical Islamist ideology}} | |||
{{italics}} | |||
{{Islamism sidebar}} | {{Islamism sidebar}} | ||
A '''takfiri''' (from {{lang-ar|تكفيري}} ''{{transl|ar|ALA-LC|takfīrī}}'') is a ] who accuses another Muslim (or member of ] religions) of ].<ref>http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RS21745.pdf</ref> The accusation itself is called '']'', derived from the word '']'' (infidel), and is described as when "one who is, or claims to be, a Muslim is declared impure,"<ref name=KepelJihad>Kepel, Gilles; ''Jihad: the Trail of Political Islam'', London: I.B. Tauris, 2002, page 31</ref> and the act of accusing other Muslims of being takfiri can itself be a sectarian slur such as when used by Shi'a extremists such as ].<ref>{{cite web | url= http://mideastafrica.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/01/29/the_vocabulary_of_sectarianism |last1=Zelin|first1=Aaron Y.| last2=Smyth|first2=Phillip| title= The vocabulary of sectarianism |publisher= Foreign Policy | accessdate= 17 September 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iraq%20Syria%20Lebanon/Lebanon/153-lebanon-s-hizbollah-turns-eastward-to-syria.pdf| title=Lebanon's Hizbollah Turns Eastward to Syria|publisher=International Crisis Group | format=PDF| accessdate= 15 September 2014}}</ref> | |||
'''''Takfiri''''' ({{langx|ar|تَكْفِيرِيّ}}, ''{{transl|ar|ALA-LC|takfīriyy}}'' lit. "]") is an ] and ] denoting a ] who excommunicates one of his/her coreligionists, i.e. who accuses another Muslim of being an ].<ref name="EncyclopediaofIslam">{{cite encyclopedia |author1-last=Hunwick |author1-first=Ed |author2-last=Hunwick |author2-first=J. O. |year=2000 |title=Takfīr |editor1-last=Bosworth |editor1-first=C. E. |editor1-link=Clifford Edmund Bosworth |editor2-last=van Donzel |editor2-first=E. J. |editor2-link=Emeri Johannes van Donzel |editor3-last=Heinrichs |editor3-first=W. P. |editor3-link=Wolfhart Heinrichs |editor4-last=Lewis |editor4-first=B. |editor5-last=Pellat |editor5-first=Ch. |editor5-link=Charles Pellat |editor6-last=Bearman |editor6-first=P. J. |editor6-link=Peri Bearman |encyclopedia=] |location=Leiden and Boston |publisher=Brill Publishers |volume=10 |doi=10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1154 |isbn=978-9004161214}}</ref><ref name="EoQ-Quran">{{cite encyclopedia |author-last=Adang |author-first=Camilla |year=2001 |title=Belief and Unbelief: Choice or Destiny? |editor-last=McAuliffe |editor-first=Jane Dammen |editor-link=Jane Dammen McAuliffe |encyclopedia=] |volume=I |location=Leiden and Boston |publisher=Brill Publishers |doi=10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00025 |isbn=978-90-04-14743-0}}</ref><ref name="Poljarevic 2021">{{cite book |author-last=Poljarevic |author-first=Emin |year=2021 |chapter=Theology of Violence-oriented Takfirism as a Political Theory: The Case of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) |editor1-last=Cusack |editor1-first=Carole M. |editor1-link=Carole M. Cusack |editor2-last=Upal |editor2-first=M. Afzal |editor2-link=Afzal Upal |title=Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements |location=Leiden and Boston |publisher=Brill Publishers |series=Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion |volume=21 |doi=10.1163/9789004435544_026 |doi-access=free |isbn=978-9004435544 |issn=1874-6691 |pages=485–512}}</ref><ref name="FAS-2009">{{cite web |author-last=Blanchard |author-first=Christopher |date=28 January 2009 |title=Islam: Sunnis and Shia |url=https://fas.org/irp/crs/RS21745.pdf |url-status=live |department=fpc.state.gov |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220511230914/https://irp.fas.org/crs/RS21745.pdf |archive-date=11 May 2022 |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref> | |||
In principle the only group authorised to declare a member of an Abrahamic religion a kafir ("infidel") is the ], and this is only done once all the prescribed legal precautions have been taken.<ref name=KepelJihad/> However, a growing number of splinter ]/] groups, labeled by some scholars as Salafi-Takfiris,<ref>Oliveti, Vincenzo; ''Terror's Source: the Ideology of Wahhabi-Salafism and its Consequences,'' Birmingham: Amadeus Books, 2002</ref> have split from the orthodox method of establishing takfir through the processes of the ] law, and have reserved the right to declare apostasy themselves against any Muslim in addition to non-Muslims. | |||
Since according to the traditional interpretations of Islamic law ('']'') the punishment for ] is the ],<ref name="Poljarevic 2021" /> and potentially a cause of strife and violence within the Muslim community ('']''),<ref name="Jo">Karawan, Ibrahim A. (1995). "Takfīr". In John L. Esposito. ''The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World''. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</ref> an ill-founded accusation of '']'' is considered a major forbidden act ('']'') in ],<ref name="auto1">{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=Michael |title=Contending with Terrorism |date=2010 |page=89}}{{ISBN?}}</ref> with one ] declaring that one who wrongly declares another Muslim to be an unbeliever is himself an apostate.<ref name="maher-2017-75">Shiraz Maher, ''Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea'', Penguin UK (2017), p. 75 {{ISBN?}}</ref> Takfirism has been called a "minority ideology" which "advocates the killing of other Muslims declared to be ]".<ref name="Badar-radical-2007">{{cite journal |last1=Badara |first1=Mohamed |last2=Nagata |first2=Masaki |last3=Tueni |first3=Tiphanie |date=June 2017 |title=The Radical Application of the Islamist Concept of ''Takfir'' |url=https://www.geopoldia.org/images/bedas-tueni2.pdf |url-status=live |journal=] |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill Publishers |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=134–162 |doi=10.1163/15730255-31020044 |issn=1573-0255 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711093513/https://www.geopoldia.org/images/bedas-tueni2.pdf |archive-date=11 July 2019 |access-date=25 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
==Classification== | |||
Takfiris have been classified by some commentators as violent offshoots of the ], yet while Salafism is seen as a form of 'fundamentalist Islam', it is not an inherently violent movement that condones terrorism.<ref>Oliveti, ''Terror's Source'', (2002), page 45</ref> Takfiris, on the other hand, condone acts of ] as legitimate methods of achieving religious or political goals. Middle East expert ] has written that | |||
<blockquote>"''takfiri'' generally refers to a Sunni Muslim who looks at the world in black-and-white; there are true believers and then there are nonbelievers, with no shades in between. A ''takfiri'''s mission is to re-create the ] according to a literal interpretation of the ]."<ref>{{cite book|last=Baer|first=Robert|authorlink=Robert Baer|year=2008|title=The Devil We Know|publisher=Crown|location=New York|isbn=978-0-307-40864-8}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
The accusation itself is called ''takfīr'', derived from the Arabic word '']'' ("unbeliever"), and is described as when "one who is a Muslim is declared impure."<ref name=KepelJihad>Kepel, Gilles; ''Jihad: the Trail of Political Islam'', London: I.B. Tauris, 2002, p. 31 {{ISBN?}}</ref> An apostate is a ''murtad''. In principle, in mainstream ], the only group authorized to declare another Muslim a ''kāfir'' are the scholars of Islam ('']''), and this is only done if all the prescribed legal precautions have been taken.<ref name=KepelJihad/> Traditionally, the declaration of ''takfīr'' was used against self-professed Muslims who denied one or more of the ]. Throughout the ], Islamic denominations and movements such as ] and the ] have been accused of ''takfīr'' and labeled as ''kuffār'' ("unbelievers") by ], becoming victims of ], ], and ] perpetrated against them over the centuries.<ref name="Poljarevic 2021"/><ref name="Badar-radical-2007"/><ref name="Baele 2019">{{cite journal |author-last=Baele |author-first=Stephane J. |date=October 2019 |title=Conspiratorial Narratives in Violent Political Actors' Language |url=https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/10871/37355/2/ConspiratorialNarratives_MainArticle_Resubmit_FINAL_CLEAN%20.pdf |editor-last=Giles |editor-first=Howard |journal=] |publisher=Sage Publications |volume=38 |issue=5–6 |pages=706–734 |doi=10.1177/0261927X19868494 |doi-access=free |hdl=10871/37355 |hdl-access=free |issn=1552-6526 |s2cid=195448888 |access-date=3 January 2022}}</ref><ref name="Rickenbacher 2019">{{cite journal |last=Rickenbacher |first=Daniel |date=August 2019 |title=The Centrality of Anti-Semitism in the Islamic State's Ideology and Its Connection to Anti-Shiism |editor-last=Jikeli |editor-first=Gunther |journal=] |location=Basel, Switzerland |publisher=MDPI |volume=10 |issue=8: "The Return of Religious Antisemitism?" |page=483 |doi=10.3390/rel10080483 |doi-access=free |issn=2077-1444}}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis |last=Ghasemi |first=Faezeh |date=2020 |title=Anti-Shiism Discourse |publisher=] |type=PhD |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342697889}}<br />{{bullet}}{{cite journal |first=Faezeh |last=Ghasemi |title=Anti-Shiite and Anti-Iranian Discourses in ISIS Texts |journal=Discourse |volume=11 |issue=3 |date=2017 |pages=75–96 |url=https://www.magiran.com/paper/1713990}}<br />{{bullet}}{{cite web |first=Toby |last=Matthiesen |title=The Islamic State Exploits Entrenched Anti-Shia Incitement |date=21 July 2015 |work=Sada |publisher=] |url=https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/?fa=60799}}</ref><ref name="Uddin 2014">{{cite book |author-last=Uddin |author-first=Asma T. |year=2014 |chapter=A Legal Analysis of Ahmadi Persecution in Pakistan |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k9TVCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA81 |editor-last=Kirkham |editor-first=David M. |title=State Responses to Minority Religions |location=Farnham, UK and Burlington, Vermont |publisher=Ashgate Publishing/Routledge |series=Ashgate Inform Series on Minority Religions and Spiritual Movements |pages=81–98 |isbn=978-1-4724-1647-6 |lccn=2013019344}}</ref> The term ''Takfiri'' has also been pejoritavely deployed by ] groups to demonise and justify violence against ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Siegel |first=Alexandra |date=December 2015 |title=Sectarian Twitter Wars: Sunni-Shia Conflict and Cooperation in the Digital Age |url=https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_262_Siegel_Sectarian_Twitter_Wars_.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230503231059/https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_262_Siegel_Sectarian_Twitter_Wars_.pdf |archive-date=3 May 2023 |website=Carnegie Endowment for International Peace |page=6}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Y. Zelin, Smyth |first=Aaron, Phillip |date=29 January 2014 |title=The Vocabulary of Sectarianism |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/vocabulary-sectarianism |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220201071024/https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/vocabulary-sectarianism |archive-date=1 February 2022 |website=The Washington Institute for Near East Policy}}</ref> | |||
==Beliefs== | |||
Takfiris believe in Islam strictly according to their interpretation of ]'s and his companions' actions and statements, and do not accept any deviation from their path; they reject any reform or change to their interpretation of religion as it was revealed in the time of the prophet. Those who change their religion from Islam to any other way of life, or deny any of the fundamental foundations of Islam, or who worship, follow or obey anything other than Islam, become those upon whom the takfiris declare the "takfir", calling them ]s from Islam and so no longer Muslim. | |||
In the ], a sect originating in the 7th century CE known as the ] carried out ''takfīr'' against both Sunnī and Shīʿa ], and became the ] for centuries.<ref name="Izutsu 2006">{{cite book |last=Izutsu |first=Toshihiko |author-link=Toshihiko Izutsu |year=2006 |origyear=1965 |title=The Concept of Belief in Islamic Theology: A Semantic Analysis of Imān and Islām |chapter=The Infidel (''Kāfir''): The Khārijites and the origin of the problem |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PDxHG5MtLawC&pg=PA1 |location=] |publisher=Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies at ] |pages=1–20 |isbn=9839154702}}</ref> Since the latter half of the 20th century, ''takfīr'' has also been used for "sanctioning violence against leaders of ]"<ref name="OISO"/> who do not enforce ] or are otherwise "deemed insufficiently religious".<ref name="Nedza 2016">{{cite book |author-last=Nedza |author-first=Justyna |year=2016 |chapter=The Sum of Its Parts: The State as Apostate in Contemporary Saudi Militant Islamism |editor1-last=Adang |editor1-first=Camilla |editor2-last=Ansari |editor2-first=Hassan |editor3-last=Fierro |editor3-first=Maribel |editor4-last=Schmidtke |editor4-first=Sabine |editor4-link=Sabine Schmidtke |title=Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr |location=Leiden and Boston |publisher=Brill Publishers |series=Islamic History and Civilization |volume=123 |doi=10.1163/9789004307834_013 |pages=304–326 |isbn=978-9004307834 |issn=0929-2403}}</ref> This arbitrary application of ''takfīr'' has become a "central ]"<ref name="OISO">{{cite web |title=Takfiri |url=http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e2319 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130117234531/http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e2319 |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 17, 2013 |website=Oxford Islamic Studies Online |access-date=18 December 2020}}</ref> of insurgent ]-] ] and ],<ref name="Baele 2019"/><ref name="Badara 2017">{{cite journal |last1=Badara |first1=Mohamed |last2=Nagata |first2=Masaki |date=November 2017 |title=Modern Extremist Groups and the Division of the World: A Critique from an Islamic Perspective |journal=] |location=Leiden |publisher=Brill Publishers |volume=31 |issue=4 |doi=10.1163/15730255-12314024 |doi-access=free |issn=1573-0255 |pages=305–335}}</ref><ref name="Jalal 2009">{{cite book |last=Jalal |first=Ayesha |author-link=Ayesha Jalal |year=2009 |chapter=Islam Subverted? Jihad as Terrorism |title=Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |publisher=Harvard University Press |pages=239–240 |doi=10.4159/9780674039070-007 |isbn=978-0674039070 |s2cid=152941120}}</ref><ref>Oliveti, Vincenzo. ''Terror's Source: The Ideology of Wahhabi-Salafism and its Consequences''. Birmingham: Amadeus Books, 2002 {{ISBN?}}.</ref> particularly ] and ],<ref name="Poljarevic 2021"/><ref name="Baele 2019"/><ref name="Badara 2017"/><ref name="JulieRajan 2015">{{cite book |author-last=Julie Rajan |author-first=V. G. |year=2015 |chapter=Islamism, Al Qaeda, and ''Takfir'' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Pz5yBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA44 |title=Al Qaeda's Global Crisis: The Islamic State, Takfir, and the Genocide of Muslims |location=London and New York |publisher=Routledge |series=Contemporary Terrorism Studies |pages=44–102 |isbn=978-1138221802 |lccn=2014031954}}</ref> who have drawn on the ideas of the ] scholars ] and ], and those of the modern Islamist ideologues ] and ].<ref name="Baele 2019"/><ref name="Badara 2017"/><ref name="Jalal 2009"/> The practice of ''takfīr'' has been denounced as deviant by the ] and mainstream Muslim scholars such as ] (d. 1977) and ].<ref name="OISO"/> | |||
According to at least one source (Trevor Stanley) the precedent "for the declaration of takfir against a leader" came from Medieval Islamic scholar Taqi al-Din ] who issued a famous ] declaring ] against ] not because they were invading but because they were ], apostasy from Islam being punishable by death. Though the Mongols had converted to Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah reasoned that since they followed their traditional ] rather than Islamic ] law, they were not really Muslims and thus apostates.<ref name=PWHCE>{{cite web|last=Stanley|first=Trevor|title=Kufr - Kaffir - Takfir - Takfiri|url=http://www.pwhce.org/takfiri.html|publisher=Perspectives on World History and Current Events|accessdate=30 Dec 2013}}</ref> More recently 18th-century Islamic Revivalist ] and 20th-century Muslim authors ] and ], referenced Ibn Taymiyyah in condemning self-proclaimed Muslims as not really Muslims. Al-Wahhab condemned practices of ], ] and other Muslims as ] (innovation of the religion), and al-Wahhab's followers slew many Muslims for allegedly pagan ('']'') practices. In his influential book ], ] argued not that some Muslims should not be considered Muslims, but that the failure of the world Muslim community to obey Shariah law meant, "the Muslim community has been extinct for a few centuries" having fallen back into a state of pagan ignorance ('']'')<ref>Sayyid Qutb, ''Milestones'', p. 11</ref><ref></ref> | |||
==Issues and criticisms== | |||
Elie Podeh distinguishes between conservative Islamists, "jihadi" Muslims and takfiri groups. Like jihadis, Takfiri groups advocate armed struggle against the secular regime, invoking the concepts of jahiliyya, al-hakimiyya (God's sovereignty), and al-takfir (branding as apostate). However, takfiri groups are more extreme, regarding the whole of Egyptian society as kafir, and therefore completely disengage themselves from it. Also unlike jihadis, takfiri groups (according to Podeh) make no distinction between the regime and the ordinary population when employing violence.<ref> by Elie Podeh. in ''Religious Radicalism in the Greater Middle East'', edited by Efraim Inbar, Bruce Maddy-Weitzman, Routledge, Jan 11, 2013</ref> | |||
Traditionally, Muslims have agreed that someone born a ] or converting to Islam ] is deserving of ],<ref name="Poljarevic 2021"/> provided legal precautions have been taken (the accused being educated in their error, given a chance to repent, evaluated for mental soundness, etc.). This is true in the case of a self-professed apostates, or "extreme, persistent and aggressive" proponents of religious innovation ('']'').<ref name="Lewis-229">{{cite book|last1=Lewis|first1=Bernard|title=The Middle East: a Brief History of the Last 2000 Years|date=1995|publisher=Touchstone|isbn=978-0684832807|page=229}}</ref> | |||
From the 19th century onwards, liberal/modernist/reformist Muslims have complained that this capital punishment is a violation of the principle of ], and only those guilty of treason should be executed. Revivalist and conservative Muslims see the capital punishment as a matter of obedience to the ] (''sharīʿa'') and protection of the faith. Since the 20th century, capital punishment is seldom applied by the state in ]; instead, it is frequently carried out by "vigilantes" who believe that they are executing their "individual duty". (''See also'': ]) | |||
There is also agreement among Muslims in the case of declaring ''takfīr'' upon orthodox, self-professed Muslims. Generally, Muslims agree that the declaration of ''takfīr'' is "so serious, and mistakes therein are so grave", that great care is needed, and that if the accused is actually a believing Muslim, then the act of accusing makes the accuser themself guilty of ].<ref name="Badar-radical-2007"/> There is also a belief shared by various ] which assert that the practice of ''takfīr'' may be dangerous for the entire ] (''Ummah'');<ref name="Jo"/> they believe that if ''takfīr'' is "used wrongly or unrestrainedly", retaliation could lead down a slippery slope of "discord and sedition" to mutual excommunication and "complete disaster."<ref name=KepelJihad/> The Sunnī ] ] group and ] ] ], for example, have declared ''takfīr'' not only upon ] and ] but also against rival insurgent Islamist groups (although they are also Salafi-jihadists) and all those who oppose its policy of ] and killing ] and Non-Muslim religious minorities, particularly ] and ].<ref name="Poljarevic 2021"/><ref name="Baele 2019"/><ref name="Rickenbacher 2019"/><ref name="Badara 2017"/><ref name="what-isis-really-wants"/> | |||
Takfiris also reject the traditional Muslim duty to obey one's legitimate rulers in all manners that do not contradict Sharia, as sedition is viewed as a great danger to a nation. However, Takfiris consider all political authority that does not abide by their interpretation of Islam as illegitimate and apostate; a view which closely mirrors ] on jahiliyyah.<ref>Esposito, John L.; ''Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam'', Oxford University Press 2002, page 59/60.</ref> As such, violence against such regimes is considered legitimate. | |||
What to do in a situation where self-professed Muslim(s) disagree with other Muslims on an important doctrinal point is more controversial. In the case of the ]—who are accused of denying the basic tenet of ]—the ] declares in ] of the ], that Ahmadi Muslims are ] and deprives them of religious rights.<ref name="Uddin 2014"/><ref name="law.harvard.edu"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090917163148/http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss16/khan.shtml |date=17 September 2009 }} ''Harvard Human Rights Journal'', Vol 16, September 2003.<br> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090930094915/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4317998.stm |date=30 September 2009 }}, BBC News<br> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120402161927/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4131624.stm |date=2 April 2012 }}, BBC News</ref> All religious seminaries and '']s'' in Pakistan belonging to ] have prescribed essential reading materials specifically targeted at refuting Ahmadiyya beliefs.<ref name="uoit.ca">Rahman, Tariq: . {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070616161323/http://uoit.ca/sas/Articles/DAW.pdf |date=16 June 2007 }} Contemporary South Asia, 2004. p. 15.</ref> Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, the ] has sparked several large riots (in ] and ]) and bombings (in ]) who have targeted and killed hundreds of Ahmadi Muslims in the country.<ref name="Uddin 2014"/><ref name="law.harvard.edu"/> | |||
Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhāb makes an explicit takfeer of people who invoke or implore for help to dead people (such as the prophet and his family) or in other word, intercede for themselves with God by seeking intercession to the prophet and his family in his book and ''Kashf ush-Shubuhaat'' (Clarification Of The Doubts). | |||
==Takfiri, Khawarij== | |||
==Suicide== | |||
The importance of ''takfir'' in ], insurgent ] groups, and ] on civilians is underscored by the fact that as of 2017 (according to ] and the ]), "the overwhelming majority" of violent ] attacks had occurred in ] and the ].<ref>{{cite book |last1= Cordesman |first1=Anthony |date=2017 |title=Islam and the patterns in terrorism and violent extremism |publisher=Center for strategic and International Studies (CSIS) |url=https://www.csis.org/analysis/islam-and-patterns-terrorism-and-violent-extremism }}</ref><ref name="Kadivar-2020"/> | |||
Takfiri ] also differ significantly from that of ]. Takfiris believe that one who deliberately kills himself whilst attempting to kill enemies is a ] (''shahid'') and therefore goes straight to ]. As such all ] is absolved when a person is martyred, allowing carte blanche for the indiscriminate killing of non-combatants, for example.<ref>Oliveti, ''Terror's Source'', (2002), page 47/48.</ref> An example of such a takfiri terrorist group is the ].<ref>Darion Rhodes, Salafist Takfiri Jihadism: The Ideology of the Caucasus Emirate http://www.ict.org.il/Article/132/Salafist-Takfiri%20Jihadism%20the%20Ideology%20of%20the%20Caucasus%20Emirate</ref> | |||
Studying the largest ] country, ], Elie Podeh distinguishes between three groups: conservative ], "]" Muslims, and ''takfiri''. All three see the government and society sadly lacking in piety and in need of Islamification and restoration of '']'' law. Conservative Islamists do not support armed struggle against the secular government, whereas jihadist and takfiri groups do, and invoke the concepts of '']'' (regression of Muslims to pre-Islamic ignorance), ''al-hakimiyya'' (God's sovereignty), and ''al-takfir'' (branding as ]). However, according to Podeh's formulation, takfiri groups are more ], and regard not just some Muslims but the whole of Egyptian society as '']'', and consequently completely disengage from it. Podeh also points out that unlike jihadists, takfiri groups make no distinction between the regime and the ordinary population when employing violence.<ref> by Elie Podeh. in ''Religious Radicalism in the Greater Middle East'', edited by Efraim Inbar, Bruce Maddy-Weitzman, Routledge, 2013 {{ISBN?}}</ref> | |||
==Views within Islam== | |||
Opponents of the takfiris often view them as modern-day analogues of the ], a seventh-century off-shoot Islamic sect which waged war against the ]ate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/takfiri.aspx|title=Al Qaeda History |accessdate=May 21, 2014}}</ref> | |||
Some ] and ] of ] (such as Jacob Zenna, Zacharias Pier,<ref name="too-much-2017-288">{{cite journal |last1=Zenna |first1=Jacob |last2=Pierib |first2=Zacharias |title=How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization. |journal=Journal for Deradicalization |date=Summer 2017 |issue=11 |page=288|url=https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/download/107/90 |access-date=6 March 2021 |issn=2363-9849}}</ref> and Dale Eikmeier)<ref name="(Eikmeier 2007: 89)">{{cite journal |last1=Eikmeier |first1=Dale |date=Spring 2007 |title=Qutbism: An Ideology of Islamic-fascism |journal=Parameters: U.S. Army War College Journal| page=89 |url=https://www.academia.edu/7384358 |access-date=10 March 2021}}</ref> argue that the accusation of ''takfir'' may serve as a sort of ingenious "legal ]" for ] insurgents, allowing them to bypass the '']'' injunction against imprisoning or killing fellow Muslims. Since it is very difficult to overthrow governments without killing their (self-proclaimed) Muslim rulers and officials or any Muslim opposing the Islamists, and since enforcing ''sharia'' is the insurgents '']'', the prohibition against killing ] is a major impediment against taking power. But if the enemy can be made to be not Muslims but ] claiming to be Muslims, the prohibition is turned into a religious ].<ref name="too-much-2017-288"/> | |||
==In mainstream media== | |||
The term ''takfiri'' was brought to a more public prominence by the ] investigative journalist ], in his 2005 BBC television series ''The New Al Qaeda''.<ref> ]</ref> However, the term was used frequently by proponents of Salafism before the Taylor series. In 2012, Shiite social media websites have mentioned Takfiri organizations.<ref>http://www.shiitenews.com/index.php/articles/5615-who-are-takfiri-deobandis</ref> | |||
Takfiris have also been classified by some scholars as violent offshoots of the ]. Although most Salafis oppose terrorism or violence within the Muslim community ('']''),<ref>Oliveti, ''Terror's Source'', (2002), p. 45</ref> Takfiris condone acts of violence as legitimate methods of achieving religious or political goals. ] expert ] has written that | |||
<blockquote>"''takfiri'' generally refers to a ] ] who looks at the world in black-and-white; there are true believers and then there are ], with no shades in between. A ''takfiri''{{'}}s mission is to re-create the ] according to a ] of the ]."<ref>{{cite book|last=Baer|first=Robert|author-link=Robert Baer|year=2008|title=The Devil We Know|publisher=Crown|location=New York|isbn=978-0307408648}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
Takfiris also reject the traditional Muslim duty to obey one's legitimate rulers in all manners that do not contradict the Sharia, as sedition is viewed as a great danger to a nation. However, takfiris consider all political authority that does not abide by their interpretation of Islam to be illegitimate and therefore ]; this view closely mirrors ] on what he perceived as '']'' in the ].<ref>Esposito, John L.; ''Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam'', Oxford University Press 2002, pp. 59–60. {{ISBN?}}</ref> As such, violence against such regimes is considered legitimate. | |||
The term ''takfiri'' was brought to a more public prominence by the ] investigative journalist ] in his 2005 ] series ''The New Al Qaeda''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/4697707.stm|title=The New Al-Qaeda: Madrid bombings|date=21 July 2005|via=news.bbc.co.uk}}</ref> | |||
===Suicide=== | |||
Takfiri ] also differ significantly from those of ]. In mainstream ], suicide is considered a major ], but Takfiris believe that one who deliberately kills himself whilst attempting to kill a religious enemy is a ] ('']'') and therefore goes straight to ] without having to wait for the ]. According to this doctrine, all ] of the martyrs are absolved when they die in martyrdom, allowing '']'' for the indiscriminate killing of ] and ].<ref>Oliveti, ''Terror's Source'', (2002), pp. 47–48. {{ISBN?}}</ref> | |||
==Historical background== | |||
In the "early times" of Islam, "charges of apostasy" were also "not unusual, and ... the terms 'unbeliever' and 'apostate' were commonly used in religious polemic"<ref name="Lewis-229"/> in hopes of silencing the deviant and prodding the lax back to the straight path. Classical manuals of jurisprudence in Islam sometimes provided fairly detailed lists of practices and beliefs that would render a Muslim an apostate that went far beyond infractions of the basic tenets of Islam. For example, ''Madjma' al-Anhur'' by Hanafi scholar Shaykhzadeh (d.1667 CE), declared such misdeeds as "to assert the ], to translate the Quran, ... to pay respect to non-Muslims, to celebrate ] the Iranian New Year", would make a Muslim an unbeliever.<ref name=shaykhzadeh>Shaykhzadeh, ''Madjma' al-anhur'' (1, pp. 629–637); cited in {{cite journal|last1=Peters |first1=Rudolph |last2=Vries |first2=Gert J. J. De |title=Apostasy in Islam |journal=Die Welt des Islams |year=1976 |volume=17 |issue=1/4 |pages=1–25 |doi= 10.2307/1570336 |jstor=1570336}}</ref> Nonetheless, those accused of apostasy were usually left "unmolested",<ref name="Lewis-229"/> and in general executions for apostasy were "rare in Islamic history",<ref name="ELLIOTT-3-26-2006">{{cite news|last1=Elliott|first1=Andrea|title=In Kabul, a Test for Shariah |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/weekinreview/26elliott.html|access-date=28 November 2015 |work=The New York Times|date=26 March 2006 |url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160111010040/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/weekinreview/26elliott.html?_r=0|archive-date=11 January 2016}}</ref> unless the violation was "extreme, persistent and aggressive".<ref name="Lewis-229"/> | |||
According to researcher Trevor Stanley, the precedent "for the declaration of takfir against a leader" came from the medieval Islamic scholar Taqi al-Din ] (1263–1328 CE), who supported the ] in their jihad against the ]. After the Mongols converted to Islam, another cause was sought for the jihad against them. In his famous ], Ibn Taymiyyah reasoned that since the Mongols followed their traditional ] law rather than ] (Islamic law), they were not really Muslims,<ref name=PWHCE>{{cite web|last=Stanley|first=Trevor|title=Kufr – Kaffir – Takfir – Takfiri|url=http://www.pwhce.org/takfiri.html|publisher=Perspectives on World History and Current Events|access-date=30 Dec 2013}}</ref> and since non-Muslims who called themselves Muslims were ], the Mongols should be killed. Ibn Taymiyya wrote that he "was among the strictest of people in forbidding that a specific person be accuse of unbelief, immorality or sin until proof from the Messenger has been established", yet he "regularly accused his opponents of outright unbelief and has become a source of inspiration to many Islamist and even takfiri movements."<ref name="Adang-2015-14">{{cite book |author1-last=Ansari |author1-first=Hassan |author2-last=Fierro |author2-first=Maribel |author3-last=Schmidtke |author3-first=Sabine |author3-link=Sabine Schmidtke |year=2016 |chapter=Introduction |editor1-last=Adang |editor1-first=Camilla |editor2-last=Ansari |editor2-first=Hassan |editor3-last=Fierro |editor3-first=Maribel |editor4-last=Schmidtke |editor4-first=Sabine |title=Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr |location=Leiden and Boston |publisher=Brill Publishers |series=Islamic History and Civilization |volume=123 |doi=10.1163/9789004307834_002 |pages=1–24 |isbn=978-9004307834 |issn=0929-2403}}</ref> | |||
=== Kharijites === | |||
{{Main|Khawarij}} | |||
] dates back to the ] with the emergence of the ] in the 7th century CE.<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/> The original schism between ], ], and ] among ] was disputed over the ] to the guidance of the ] (''Ummah'') after the death of the ] ].<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/> From their essentially political position, the Kharijites developed extreme doctrines that set them apart from both mainstream Sunni and Shiʿa Muslims.<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/> Shiʿas believe ] is the true successor to Muhammad, while Sunnis consider ] to hold that position. The Kharijites broke away from both the Shiʿas and the Sunnis during the ] (the first Islamic Civil War);<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/> they were particularly noted for adopting a radical approach to '']'' (excommunication), whereby they declared both Sunni and Shiʿa Muslims to be either ] (''kuffār'') or ] (''munāfiḳūn''), and therefore deemed them ] for their perceived ].<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/another-battle-with-islams-true-believers/article20802390/|title=Another battle with Islam's 'true believers'|last=Khan|first=Sheema|date=12 May 2018|website=The Globe and Mail|publisher=The Globe and Mail Opinion|access-date=19 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/publications/free/the-balance-of-islam-in-challenging-extremism.pdf|title=The Balance of Islam in Challenging Extremism|last=Hasan|first=Usama|date=2012|website=Quiliam Foundation|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140802045255/http://www.quilliamfoundation.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/publications/free/the-balance-of-islam-in-challenging-extremism.pdf|archive-date=2 August 2014|access-date=2015-11-17}}</ref> | |||
The Islamic tradition traces the origin of the Kharijities to the ] in 657 CE. When 'Ali was faced with a military stalemate and agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration, some of his party withdrew their support from him. "Judgement belongs to God alone" (لاَ حُكْكْ إلَا لِلّهِ) became the slogan of these secessionists.<ref name="Izutsu 2006"/> They also called themselves ''al-Shurat'' ("the Vendors"), to reflect their willingness to sell their lives in ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|last=Brown|first=Daniel|title=A New Introduction to Islam|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Ltd|year=2017|isbn=978-1118953464|edition=3rd|location=Oxford|pages=163–169}}</ref> | |||
These original Kharijites opposed both 'Ali and Mu'awiya, and appointed their own leaders. They were decisively defeated by 'Ali, who was in turn assassinated by a Kharijite. Kharijites engaged in guerilla warfare against the ], but only became a movement to be reckoned with during the ] (the second Islamic Civil War) when they at one point controlled more territory than any of their rivals. The Kharijites were, in fact, one of the major threats to Ibn al-Zubayr's bid for the caliphate; during this time they controlled Yamama and most of southern Arabia, and captured the oasis town of al-Ta'if.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
The Azariqa, considered to be the extreme faction of the Kharijites, controlled parts of western Iran under the Umayyads until they were finally put down in 699 CE. The more moderate ] Kharijites were longer-lived, continuing to wield political power in North and East Africa and in eastern Arabia during the ]. Because of their readiness to declare any opponent as apostate, the extreme Kharijites tended to fragment into small groups. One of the few points that the various Kharijite splinter groups held in common was their view of the caliphate, which differed from other Muslim theories on two points. | |||
* First, they were principled egalitarians, holding that any pious Muslim ("even an ]") can become Caliph and that family or tribal affiliation is inconsequential. The only requirements for leadership are piety and acceptance by the community. | |||
* Second, they agreed that it is the duty of the believers to depose any leader who falls into error. This second principle had profound implications for Kharijite theology. Applying these ideas to the early history of the caliphate, Kharijites only accept Abu Bakr and 'Umar as legitimate caliphs. Of 'Uthman's caliphate they recognize only the first six years as legitimate, and they reject 'Ali altogether. | |||
By the time that Ibn al-Muqaffa' wrote his political treatise early in the 'Abbasid period, the Kharijites were no longer a significant political threat, at least in the ]. The memory of the menace they had posed to Muslim unity and of the moral challenge generated by their pious idealism still weighed heavily on Muslim political and religious thought, however. Even if the Kharijites could no longer threaten, their ghosts still had to be answered.<ref name=":0" /> The Ibadis are the only Kharijite group to surivive into modern times. | |||
=== ibn Abdul-Wahhāb === | |||
The 18th-century Islamic revivalist ] and 20th-century Muslim authors ] and ] have referred to Ibn Taymiyyah when condemning self-proclaimed Muslims as not being real Muslims. ibn Abd al-Wahhab condemned the practices of ], ] and other Muslims as ] (innovation of the religion), and ibn Abd al-Wahhab's followers slew many Muslims for allegedly pagan ('']'') practices. | |||
(In his books ''Risālah Aslu Dīn Al-Islām wa Qā’idatuhu''<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://al-aqeedah.com/images/books/asludeen.pdf|title=Risālah Aslu Dīn Al-Islām wa Qā'idatuhu|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140723034556/http://al-aqeedah.com/images/books/asludeen.pdf |archive-date=2014-07-23 }}</ref> and ''Kashf ush-Shubuhaat'' (''Clarification of the Doubts''), ibn Abdul-Wahhāb makes an explicit takfir of people who invoke or implore for help from dead people (such as the prophet and his family) or, in other words, intercede for themselves with God by seeking intercession from the prophet and his family.)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.islamicweb.com/beliefs/creed/Clarification_Doubts.htm|title=IslamicWeb|work=islamicweb.com}}</ref> | |||
=== Colonial era and after === | |||
In the colonial and post-colonial Muslim world the influence and pressure of Western powers meant that not only was apostasy rare in practice, but that it was (contrary to '']'') abolished as a crime punishable by death in state statutes of law<ref name=peters-apostasy-24>{{cite journal|last1=Peters |first1=Rudolph |last2=Vries |first2=Gert J. J. De |title=Apostasy in Islam |journal=Die Welt des Islams |year=1976 |volume=17 |issue=1/4 |page=24 |doi= 10.2307/1570336 |jstor=1570336}}</ref> (the West also encouraged establishing laws giving equal rights to women and non-Muslims in violation of ''sharia''). Some Muslims (such as the cleric 'Adb al-Qadir 'Awdah) responded by preaching that if the state would not kill apostates then it had "become a duty of individual Moslems" to do so, and gave advice on how to plead in court to avoid punishment after being arrested for such a murder.<ref>'Abd al-Qadir 'Awdah, ''al-tashri al-djina'i al-Islam muqaran bi-al-qanun al-wadi'', Bayrut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi, n.d. 2 volumes; v. 1, pp. 535–538; quoted in {{cite journal|last1=Peters |first1=Rudolph |last2=Vries |first2=Gert J. J. De |title=Apostasy in Islam |journal=Die Welt des Islams |year=1976 |volume=17 |issue=1/4 |page=17 |doi= 10.2307/1570336 |jstor=1570336}}</ref> | |||
====Sayyid Qutb==== | |||
{{Main|Sayyid Qutb}} | |||
] could be said to have founded the actual movement of radical Islam.<ref name="Moussalli 2012">{{cite book |author-last=Moussalli |author-first=Ahmad S. |year=2012 |chapter=Sayyid Qutb: Founder of Radical Islamic Political Ideology |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=D-LfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA9 |editor-last=Akbarzadeh |editor-first=Shahram |title=Routledge Handbook of Political Islam |location=London and New York |publisher=Routledge |edition=1st |pages=9–26 |isbn=978-1138577824 |lccn=2011025970}}</ref><ref name="Cook 2015">{{cite book |last=Cook |first=David |author-link=David Cook (historian) |year=2015 |origyear=2005 |chapter=Radical Islam and Contemporary Jihad Theory |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SqE2DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA102 |title=Understanding Jihad |location=Berkeley |publisher=University of California Press |edition=2nd |pages=102–110 |isbn=978-0520287327 |jstor=10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10 |lccn=2015010201}}</ref> Unlike the other Islamic thinkers that have been mentioned above, Qutb was not an ].<ref name="Cook 2015"/> He was a prominent leader of the ] and a highly influential Islamist ideologue,<ref name="Moussalli 2012"/><ref name="Cook 2015"/> and the first to articulate these anathemizing principles in his magnum opus ''Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān'' (''In the shade of the Qurʾān'') and his 1966 manifesto ''Maʿālim fīl-ṭarīq'' ('']''), which lead to his execution by the Egyptian government.<ref name="Cook 2015"/><ref>Gibril Haddad, “Quietism and End-Time Reclusion in the Qurʾān and Hadith: Al-Nābulusī and His Book Takmīl Al-Nuʿūt within the ʿuzla Genre,” ''Islamic Sciences'' 15, no. 2 (2017): pp. 108–109)</ref> Other Salafi movements in the ] and across the ] adopted many of his Islamist principles.<ref name="Moussalli 2012"/><ref name="Cook 2015"/> According to Qutb, the Muslim community has been extinct for several centuries and reverted to '']'' (the pre-Islamic age of ignorance) because those who call themselves Muslims have failed to follow the ].<ref name="Moussalli 2012"/><ref name="Cook 2015"/> In order to ], bring back its days of glory, and free the Muslims from the clasps of ignorance, Qutb proposed the shunning of modern society, establishing a vanguard modeled after the early Muslims, preaching, and bracing oneself for poverty or even death as preparation for '']'' against what he perceived as ''jahili'' government/society, and overthrow them.<ref name="Moussalli 2012"/><ref name="Cook 2015"/> ], the radical Islamist ideology derived from the ideas of Qutb,<ref name="Moussalli 2012"/> was denounced by many prominent Muslim scholars as well as other members of the Muslim Brotherhood, like ]. | |||
==Late 20th and early 21st century== | |||
===Qutb and insurgents=== | |||
By the mid 1990s, one list of Qutb-inspired groups included ''], ], Jund Allah, al-Jihaad, Tanzim al-Faniyyah al-Askariyyah''—all of which were fighting violent insurgencies.<ref>Ahmad S. Moussalli, ''Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: the Ideological and Political Discourse of Sayyid Qutb'', American University of Beirut, 1992, p. 244 al-Jihaad al-Islami, Jama'a al Jihaad, and al-Takfir wa al-Hijrah were Egyptian terrorist groups. There was a Jund Allah in Egypt (Ruthven, Malise, ''Islam in the World'', Penguin, 1982, p. 315 {{ISBN?}}) and Lebanon (mentioned in Radical Islam : Medieval Theology and Modern Politics, 1985 by Emmanuel Sivan).</ref> | |||
While Qutb declared that the Islamic world had "long ago vanished from existence" <ref>Sayyid Qutb, ''Milestones'', p. 20</ref> and that true Muslims would have to confront "arrogant, mischievous, criminal and degraded people" in the struggle to restore Islam,<ref>Sayyid Qutb, ''Milestones'', p. 150</ref> he had not specifically stated that the self-professed Muslim "authorities of the ''jahili'' system" were apostates (or whether they should all be killed)<ref name=KepelJihad/>—but his followers have. | |||
], "jihad's main ideologist," (originally of ''al-Jihaad al-Islami'' aka ]), and the current leader of ], paid homage to Qutb in his book ''Knights under the Prophet's Banner''<ref>''The War for Muslim Minds : Islam and the West'', Gilles Kepel, Belknap Press, 2004, pp. 74, 79, 98</ref><ref>''Understanding Terror Networks'' by Marc Sageman, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004, p. 63 {{ISBN?}}</ref> Al Qaeda is commonly described as seeking to overthrow the "apostate" regimes in the Middle East and replace them with "true" Islamic governments,<ref name="Byman-2015">{{cite web |last1=Byman |first1=Daniel L. |title=Comparing Al Qaeda and ISIS: Different goals, different targets |url=https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/comparing-al-qaeda-and-isis-different-goals-different-targets/ |website=Brookings Institution |access-date=18 December 2020 |date=29 April 2015}}</ref><ref name="words-2008-155">{{cite book |last1=Kepel |first1=Gilles |last2=Milelli |first2=Jean-Pierre |last3=Hegghammer |first3=Thomas |title=Al Qaeda in Its Own Words |date=2008 |publisher=Belknap Press of Harvard University Press |page=155 |isbn=978-0674028043 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CabsOugrUIgC&dq=kepel+apostate+regime&pg=PA155 |access-date=18 December 2020}}</ref> and having a "habit" of denouncing Muslims who did not "accept a narrow interpretation" of Sunni Islam as "non-believers and legitimate targets."<ref name="FAS-2009"/> | |||
Shukri Mustaf, founder of '']'' (known to the public as '']'') had been in prison with Qutb, and was a "disciple" of his.<ref name=pbs/> | |||
The Takfir of ] may be more rooted in ] and ] than Qutb, but "one famous quote" from him "has been seen written on walls and has also appeared repeatedly in IS texts: 'Whoever does not pay the price of jihad, shall pay the price of abstention'".<ref name="daesh-2016-102">{{cite book |last1=al-Qarawee |first1=Harith Hasan |editor1-last=Giusto |editor1-first=Hedwig |title=Daesh and the terrorist threat: from the Middle East to Europe |date=2016 |publisher=FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies |location=Belgium |page=102 |url=https://wb-iisg.com/wp-content/uploads/bp-attachments/4850/Daesh-and-the-Terrorist-Threat_2016-daguzan-feps-islamic-terrorism.pdf |access-date=20 December 2020 |chapter=The Media, Methods and Messages of the Islamic State's Communication Strategy}}</ref> Another source writes that the "roots" of ISIL's "takfiri" ideology "can be found in the Khawarij's view, and in the writings of ], ], and ]."<ref name="Kadivar-2020">{{cite journal |last1=Kadivar |first1=Jamileh |title=Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh's Media |journal=Contemporary Review of the Middle East |date=May 18, 2020 |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=259–285 |doi=10.1177/2347798920921706 |s2cid=219460446 |doi-access=free }}</ref> | |||
===Egypt=== | |||
In Qutb's home country of Egypt in the 1980s and 1990s many authorities of "the jahili system" were attacked and killed (along with non-Muslims such as tourists and Christians) by extremists. | |||
In 1974, 100 members of the "Islamic Liberation Organization", led by one Salih Sirriya, stormed the armory of the Military Technical College in Cairo, seizing weapons and vehicles,<ref>Kepel, Gilles, ''Muslim Extremism in Egypt'', English translation published by University of California Press, 1986, p. 93 {{ISBN?}}</ref> as part of a plan to kill President ] and other top Egyptian officials. | |||
In 1977, the group '']'' (known to the public as '']'' for its strategy of takfiring Muslim society and going into psychological hijra/exile from it), kidnapped and later killed an Islamic scholar and former Egyptian government minister Muhammad al-Dhahabi. The group's founder, Shukri Mustaf—who had been imprisoned with ], and was now one of Qutb's "most radical" disciples<ref name=pbs>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/front/etc/script.html|title=Transcript | Al Qaeda's New Front | Frontline | PBS|website=www.pbs.org}}</ref>—believed that not only were the Egyptian President and his government officials ]s, but so was "Egyptian society as a whole" because it was "not fighting the Egyptian government and had thus accepted rule by non-Muslims".<ref name=Mili-29-6-2006>{{cite journal|last1=Mili|first1=Hayder|title=Jihad Without Rules: The Evolution of al-Takfir wa al-Hijra|journal=Terrorism Monitor|date=June 29, 2006|volume=4|issue=13|url=http://www.jamestown.org/programs/tm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=822&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=181&no_cache=1#.VnQ8MNKrTq4|access-date=18 December 2015}}</ref> Hundreds of members of the group were arrested and Shukri Mustafa was executed but (according to journalist Robin Wright), the group reorganized with thousands of members.<ref>Wright, Robin ''Sacred Rage'', 1985, p. 181 {{ISBN?}}</ref> Later its ex-members went on to help assassinate Anwar Sadat,<ref name="Rabasa">{{Cite book|first=Angel|last=Rabasa|title=Radical Islam in East Africa|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=x96UabsFz4AC&pg=PA70|year=2009|publisher=Rand Corporation|page=70|isbn=978-0833046796}}</ref> and be involved in the ] and Al-Qaeda.<ref name="Dalacoura"> By Katerina Dalacoura, p. 113</ref> | |||
In 1981, ] was successfully assassinated (along with six diplomats) by members of the Tanzim al-Jihad movement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.onwar.com/aced/data/echo/egypt1981.htm |title=Armed Conflict Year Index |publisher=Onwar.com |access-date=2015-07-11}}</ref> | |||
During the 1990s, a violent Islamic insurgency in Egypt, primarily perpetrated by ], targeted police, government officials (but also civilians including tourists). In one particularly bloody year (1993), 1106 persons were killed or wounded, and "several senior police officials and their bodyguards were shot dead in daylight ambushes."<ref>Murphy, Caryle ''Passion for Islam : Shaping the Modern Middle East: the Egyptian Experience'', Scribner, 2002, pp. 82–83</ref> | |||
===Algerian Civil War=== | |||
But in addition to the authorities of the jahili system, civilians also were targeted. Unlike the scholars of classical Islam, extremists not only expanded the definition of what constituted an apostate, but enforced its penalty. Along with other traditional socio-economic-ethnic-military-personality factors of insurgency, takfir played a part in the bloodshed of extremist violence. | |||
In the brutal 1991–2002 ] between the Algerian Government and various Islamist rebel groups, takfir was known to be declared by the hardline Islamist GIA (]). Starting in April 1998, a series of massacres in villages or neighborhoods killed tens, and sometimes hundreds, of civilians without disregard to the age and sex of victims.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Nesroullah Yous |author2=Salima Mellah |title=Qui a tué a Bentalha?|publisher=La Découverte, Paris|year=2000|isbn=978-2707133328}}</ref> Although the government had infiltrated the insurgents and it is thought by many that security forces as well as Islamists were involved in massacres,<ref>, 31 March 1998</ref> the GIA amir, Antar Zouabri claimed credit for two massacres (] and ]s), calling the killings an "offering to God" and declaring impious the victims and all Algerians who had not joined its ranks.<ref name=GKJTPI2002:272-3>]: pp. 272–273</ref> He declared that "except for those who are with us, all others are apostates and deserving of death,"<ref>'']'', 21 January (quoted in Willis 1996)</ref> Between 100,000 and 200,000 were ultimately killed in the war.<ref name=Ajami-2010>{{cite magazine|last1=Ajami|first1=Fouad|title=The Furrows of Algeria|magazine=New Republic|date=27 January 2010|url=https://newrepublic.com/article/books-and-arts/the-furrows-algeria|access-date=4 June 2015}}</ref> | |||
===Afghanistan=== | |||
In August 1998 the Taliban insurgents slaughtered 8000 mostly Shia ] non-combatants in ], Afghanistan. The Taliban indicated revenge, or ethnic hatred may have been a motivation for the slaughter, but comments by Mullah Niazi, the Taliban commander of the attack and newly installed governor, also indicated that ] may also have been a motive. Niazi declared in a number of post-slaughter speeches from Mosques in Mazar-i-Sharif: "Hazaras are not Muslim, they are Shi’a. They are kofr . The Hazaras killed our force here, and now we have to kill Hazaras. ... You either accept to be Muslims or leave Afghanistan. ...".<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.hrw.org/report/1998/11/01/afghanistan-massacre-mazar-i-sharif|title=The Massacre in Mazar-i Sharif|website=www.HRW.org|date=November 1, 1998 |access-date=25 December 2020}}</ref> | |||
Ironically, the Taliban seemed to have backed off the "Hazaras are not Muslim" approach and were later denounced by the ISIS for their tolerance of Shia. The 13th issue of the ISIS magazine '']'' (19 January 2016) attacked the Taliban for "considering the ] to be their brothers and publicly denouncing those who target the Rāfidah:"<ref name="Pillalamarri-why-hate-29-1-2016">{{cite news |last1=Pillalamarri |first1=Akhilesh |title=Revealed: Why ISIS Hates the Taliban |url=https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/revealed-why-isis-hates-the-taliban/ |access-date=26 December 2020 |agency=The Diplomat |date=29 January 2016}}</ref> ''Dabiq'' quoted "Abdullāh al-Wazīr, the official correspondent of the nationalist Taliban media committee": | |||
<blockquote>The Shī’ah are Muslims ... Everyone who says there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is Allah's Messenger is a Muslim. The sects are many and Allah will decide between them on Judgment Day.<ref name="Pillalamarri-why-hate-29-1-2016"/></blockquote> | |||
as evidence of Taliban wrongdoing. | |||
===Al Qaeda=== | |||
Al Qaeda shared some of the takfir beliefs of ISIS, with, for example senior leader ] denigrating Shi’a as "a religious school based on excess and falsehood", but al-Zawahiri (and Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi)<ref name="Kadivar-2020"/> also opposed attacks on Shia as a distraction from the more important goal of defeating the "far enemy", the United States. Attacks "on ordinary Shi’a, their mosques, and the mausoleum of their Imams" would "lift the burden from the Americans by diverting the mujahedeen to the Shi’a".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Al-Zawahiri |first1=A. |date=2005 |title= |url=https://fas.org/irp/news/2005/10/letter_in_english.pdf |access-date=10 January 2021}}</ref><ref>Stewart, S. (2017, March 9). Can the Islamic State and Al Qaeda find common ground? Stratfor World View. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/can-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-find-common-ground; cited in {{cite journal |last1=Kadivar |first1=Jamileh |title=Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh's Media |journal=Contemporary Review of the Middle East |date=May 18, 2020 |volume=7 |issue=3 |pages=259–285 |doi=10.1177/2347798920921706 |s2cid=219460446 |doi-access=free }}</ref> What did provoke it to takfir and "legitimize targeting" was the fighting by Muslim soldiers as the allies of the West against Muslims.<ref name="Kadivar-2020"/> | |||
===War in Iraq (2013–2017) and aftermath=== | |||
From its inception in 2013 to 2021, directly or through affiliated groups, ISIS (also ''Daesh'' or ]), "has been responsible for 27,947 terrorist deaths". The majority of these have been Muslims{{#tag:ref|according to Jamileh Kadivar based on estimates from Global Terrorism Database, 2020; Herrera, 2019; Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights & United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) Human Rights Office, 2014; Ibrahim, 2017; Obeidallah, 2014; 2015<ref name="Kadivar-2020"/>|group=Note}} "because it has regarded them as kafir".<ref name="Kadivar-2020"/> | |||
====Anti-Shia==== | |||
], who founded ] in Iraq in 1999, is said to have turned "an insurgency against US troops" in Iraq "into a Shia–Sunni ]".<ref name="mystery-NYRoB">{{cite journal|last1=Anonymous|title=The Mystery of ISIS|journal=New York Review of Books|date=August 13, 2015|volume=LXII|issue=13|url=http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/aug/13/mystery-isis/|access-date=October 29, 2015}}</ref> He saw himself as fighting not just the occupying United States military, but what he called "the sects of apostasy" (i.e. Shia Muslims).<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cpa-iraq.org/transcripts/20040212_zarqawi_full.html |title=Letter from Zarqawi to bin Laden |date=January 2004 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160120134429/http://www.cpa-iraq.org/transcripts/20040212_zarqawi_full.html |archive-date=January 20, 2016 }}</ref> In September 2005 he declared "all-out war" on ] in Iraq after the Iraqi government offensive on insurgents in the Sunni town of ].<ref name="aljazeera">{{cite news|url=http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2005/09/200849143727698709.html|work = ]|title = Al-Zarqawi declares war on Iraqi Shia|date = September 14, 2005|access-date=October 22, 2009}}</ref> | |||
The 13th issue of the ISIS magazine ''Dabiq'' dedicates "dozens of pages" were devoted "to attacking and explaining the necessity of killing Shia", who the group refers to by the label '']''. | |||
<blockquote>Initiated by a sly Jew, are an apostate sect drowning in worship of the dead, cursing the best companions and wives of the Prophet, spreading doubt on the very basis of the religion (the Qur’ān and the Sunnah), defaming the very honor of the Prophet, and preferring their "twelve" imāms to the prophets and even to Allah! ...Thus, the Rāfidah are mushrik apostates who must be killed wherever they are to be found, until no Rāfidī walks on the face of earth, even if the jihād claimants despise such...<ref name="Pillalamarri-why-hate-29-1-2016"/></blockquote> | |||
====Broader takfir==== | |||
In addition to takfiring Shia, from about 2003 to 2006 al-Zarqawi expanded "the range of behavior" that could make large number of self-proclaimed Muslims apostates: including "in certain cases, selling alcohol or drugs, wearing Western clothes or shaving one's beard, voting in an election—even for a Muslim candidate—and being lax about calling other people apostates".<ref name="what-isis-really-wants">{{cite magazine |last=Wood |first=Graeme |author-link=Graeme Wood (journalist) |title=What ISIS Really Wants |magazine=The Atlantic |location=Washington, D.C. |date=March 2015 |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150216095910/https://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/02/what-isis-really-wants/384980/ |archive-date=16 February 2015 |url-status=live |access-date=10 September 2020}}</ref> | |||
Al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006 the successor of the ]—the ], aka ISIL or Daesh, expanded takfir still further. ISIL not only called for the revival of slavery of non-Muslims (specifically of the ] minority group), but takfired any Muslim who disagreed with their policy. | |||
<blockquote>Yazidi women and children divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the ] ... Enslaving the families of the ] and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet ... and thereby apostatizing from Islam.<ref name="what-isis-really-wants"/></blockquote> | |||
Starting in 2013, the ISIL began "encouraging takfir of Muslims deemed insufficiently pure in regard of ''tawhid'' (monotheism)". The Taliban were found "to be "a 'nationalist' movement, all too tolerant" of Shia.<ref name=infighting-2019/> In 2015 ISIL "pronounced ]—then al-Qaida's affiliate in Syria—an apostate group."<ref name=infighting-2019>{{cite journal|journal=Perspectives on Terrorism |volume=13 |issue=1 |last1=Bunzel |first1=Cole |title=Ideological Infighting in the Islamic State |date=February 2019 |pages=12–21 |jstor=26590504 |access-date=17 December 2020 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/26590504}}</ref> | |||
One of ISIL's "most infamous large-scale killings" was the June 2014 ] in Iraq, "when the group murdered more than 1,500 Shi’a army cadets in ]".<ref>{{cite news | last1=Shaheen|first1= K. |date=30 August 2016 |title= Up to 15,000 ISIS victims buried in mass graves in Syria and Iraq – survey|agency=The Guardian |url= https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/30/up-to–15000-bodies-may-be-buried-in-mass-graves-in-syria-and-iraq-survey}}</ref> In a film made by ISIL about the Camp Speicher massacre, a narrator states: "All are apostates who have come from cities of apostates to kill Sunnis here, we have more than 2,000 of them."<ref name="Vice">{{cite news |title=Islamic State Releases New Footage Showing Scenes From Massacre of 1,700 Iraqi Troops |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/ev9nda/islamic-state-releases-new-footage-showing-scenes-from-massacre-of-1700-iraqi-troops |access-date=18 December 2020 |agency=Vice news |date=12 July 2015}}</ref> | |||
====Attacks on Sufis==== | |||
Along with Shia, ISIL and to a lesser extent Al-Qaeda have ], considering their the shrines and these living saints a violation of monotheism.<ref name="Specia-24-11-2017"/> The deadliest attack by ISIL on Sufis, and "the worst terrorist attack in Egypt's modern history",<ref name="Specia-24-11-2017">{{cite news |last1=Specia |first1=Megan |title=Who Are Sufi Muslims and Why Do Some Extremists Hate Them? |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/world/middleeast/sufi-muslim-explainer.html |access-date=19 December 2020 |agency=New York Times |date=24 November 2017}}</ref> occurred on 24 November 2017, when approximately 40 gunmen ] the al-Rawda mosque (associated with the Jaririya Sufi order)<ref name="auto">{{Cite web|url=http://aa.com.tr/en/africa/death-toll-in-egypt-mosque-attack-rises-to-309/981391|title=Death toll in Egypt mosque attack rises to 309|website=Anadolu Agency|access-date=2017-11-28}}</ref> near El-] Sinai during Friday prayers. 311 people were killed and at least 122 injured. While no group claimed responsibility for the attack,<ref name="CNNHunt">{{Cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/24/africa/egypt-sinai-mosque-attack/index.html|title=Egypt hunts for killers after mosque attack leaves at least 235 dead|author=Ian Lee, Laura Smith-Spark and Hamdi Alkhshali|publisher=CNN|access-date=24 November 2017}}</ref> the ]'s ] branch was strongly suspected.<ref name="AP_200">{{cite news|title=The Latest: Egypt says death toll in mosque attack up to 200|url=https://www.apnews.com/fd358a6c4e3f4955a57809266408a9ad/The-Latest:-Egypt-says-death-toll-in-mosque-attack-up-to-200|access-date=24 November 2017|work=Associated Press|date=24 November 2017}}</ref> On 25 November, the Egyptian public prosecutor's office, citing interviews with survivors, said the attackers brandished the ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-egypt-security/suspected-militants-target-mosque-with-bomb-gunfire-in-egypts-north-sinai-witnesses-idUSKBN1DO1AN|title=Gunmen in Egypt mosque attack carried Islamic State flag, prosecutor says|work=Reuters|access-date=25 November 2017}}</ref><ref name="FahmyMarke">{{Cite news|author1=Omar Fahmy |author2=Patrick Marke|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-egypt-security/gunmen-in-egypt-mosque-attack-carried-islamic-state-flag-prosecutor-says-idUSKBN1DO1AN|title=Gunmen in Egypt mosque attack carried Islamic State flag, prosecutor says|date=25 November 2017|work=Reuters}}</ref> In an interview in the Islamic State magazine '']'' (January 2017 issue five) an insurgent Islamic State commander condemned Sufi practices and identified the district where the attack occurred as one of three areas where Sufis live in Sinai that Islamic State intended to "eradicate."<ref name="WALSH-nyt">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/world/middleeast/mosque-attack-egypt.html|title=Militants Kill 305 at Sufi Mosque in Egypt's Deadliest Terrorist Attack|last1=Walsh|first1=Declan|date=24 November 2017|newspaper=The New York Times|last2=Youssef|first2=Nour}}</ref> | |||
===Syrian civil war=== | |||
Writing in 2014, Aaron Y. Zelin and Phillip Smyth argue that the combatants in the ] have used sectarian language to "cast one another" as non-Muslims/infidels, dehumanizing the enemy and intensifying the bloodshed and mayhem. The Shia ], for example had successfully "tarred all shades of the opposition, and indeed sometimes all Sunnis", with the brush of "takfiri". The Sunnis and Shiites antagonism has spread from Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, so that "there have been incidents in Australia, Azerbaijan, Britain, and Egypt".<ref name=zekub-vocab-2014>{{cite web | url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/29/the-vocabulary-of-sectarianism/ |last1=Zelin|first1=Aaron Y.| last2=Smyth|first2=Phillip| title= The vocabulary of sectarianism |publisher= Foreign Policy | access-date= 17 September 2014|quote=Another popular term used by Shiite jihadis for their Sunni enemies has been "takfiri"}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iraq%20Syria%20Lebanon/Lebanon/153-lebanon-s-hizbollah-turns-eastward-to-syria.pdf| title=Lebanon's Hizbollah Turns Eastward to Syria| publisher=International Crisis Group| access-date=15 September 2014| quote=By framing its fight as a preemptive attack on ''takfiris''—those who declare other Muslims to be apostates—Hizbollah has tarred all shades of the opposition, and indeed sometimes all Sunnis, with the same radicalising brush. It has exaggerated, and thereby exacerbated, the sectarianism of the Syrian opposition as well as its own domestic opponents| url-status=dead| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141021094218/http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/Middle%20East%20North%20Africa/Iraq%20Syria%20Lebanon/Lebanon/153-lebanon-s-hizbollah-turns-eastward-to-syria.pdf| archive-date=21 October 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url= http://blogs.channel4.com/miller-on-foreign-affairs/meeting-hezbollah-fighting-dying-confused/687 |last=Miller|first=Johnathan| title= Inside Hezbollah: fighting and dying for a confused cause |date=April 2014 |publisher= Channel Four News| access-date= 18 September 2014|quote=those they provocatively and brand "the Takfiris"}}</ref> | |||
Well-known cleric ], often branded as "moderate," declared ]s (aka Alawiyya) of Syria bigger infidels than even the Jews or Christians in a conference in June 2013 in Cairo (a conference that called for jihad in Syria and was attended by the Grand Imam of al-Azhar).<ref name=zekub-vocab-2014/> Indications that executions of the enemy may have religious motivation came from an October 2013 video clip<ref>{{ cite video |title= Hizballah Executing Syrian Prisoners? – Analyzing the Video |website=Brown Moses Blog |url=https://brown-moses.blogspot.com/2013/10/hizballah-executing-syrian-prisoners.html |date=14 October 2013 }}</ref> where Shiite Islamist fighters executed alleged captured Syrian rebels with the claim by one of the shooters that: "We are performing our taklif and we are not seeking personal vengeance."<ref name=zekub-vocab-2014/> | |||
===Boko Haram in Nigeria=== | |||
According to researchers Jacob Zenna and Zacharias Pier, takfir has been a major part of the focus of ] under the leadership of ]. | |||
<blockquote>after 2010 ... Shekau, believed that jihad was obligatory and that not actively joining his jihad was tantamount to apostasy. This did not mean Shekau actively killed anyone after he announced jihad and renamed the group "JAS" in 2010. Rather, there was a "priority scale" with Christians, the government, and publicly anti-JAS Muslim preachers targeted first. This also meant any Muslims killed collaterally were not a concern since they were "guilty" for not having joined his jihad. ... October 2010, ... assassinations targeting Muslim religious leaders, especially Salafists who opposed JAS's religious interpretation, as well as civil servants, became an almost weekly occurrence in northeastern Nigeria. In addition to this, prisons, banks, churches and beer halls also were common targets of attack<ref>Watts, Michael. 2015. "Insurgent Spaces: Power, Place, and Spectacle in Nigeria" in Merrill, Heather, and Hoffman, Lisa. ''Spaces of Danger: Culture and Power in the Everyday'', Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. p. 196. {{ISBN?}}</ref><ref name="too-much-2017-294">{{cite journal |last1=Zenna |first1=Jacob |last2=Pierib |first2=Zacharias |title=How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization. |journal=Journal for Deradicalization |date=Summer 2017 |issue=11 |page=294|url=https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/download/107/90 |access-date=6 March 2021 |issn=2363-9849}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
The policy led to a schism in the group, and after Shekau ordered an "]" in ] in 2012 where "up to 200 people" were killed,<ref name="Abubakar 2012: 97">Abubakar, Aballahhi. 2012. "The media, politics and Boko blitz". '']'', 4(1): 97.</ref> a splinter group called "Ansaru" left, complaining of the excessive killing of Muslims.<ref name="too-much-2017-295">{{cite journal |last1=Zenna |first1=Jacob |last2=Pierib |first2=Zacharias |title=How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization. |journal=Journal for Deradicalization |date=Summer 2017 |issue=11 |page=295|url=https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/download/107/90 |access-date=6 March 2021 |issn=2363-9849}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{portal|Islam|Religion}} | |||
{{Div col}} | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] (Egyptian terrorist organization) | |||
* ] | |||
{{Div col end}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
=== Explanatory notes === | |||
<references /> | |||
{{reflist|group=Note}} | |||
===Citations=== | |||
{{Reflist}} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* Sahih al-Bukhari 4.574{{Full citation needed|date=July 2021}} | |||
* AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, ''A Critical Study of the Multiple Identities and Disguises of 'al-Muhajiroun': Exposing the Antics of the Cult Followers of Omar Bakri Muhammad Fustuq,'' Jamiah Media, 2009 | |||
* AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, '' |
* AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, ''A Critical Study of the Multiple Identities and Disguises of 'al-Muhajiroun': Exposing the Antics of the Cult Followers of Omar Bakri Muhammad Fustuq'', Jamiah Media, 2009 {{ISBN?}} | ||
* AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, ''Abdullah El-Faisal Al-Jamayki: A Critical Study of His Statements, Errors and Extremism in Takfeer'', Jamiah Media, 2011 {{ISBN?}} | |||
* ] (2009), ''Global Jihadism as a Transnational Movement: A Theoretical Framework'', PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara. | |||
* ] (2009), ''Global Jihadism as a Transnational Movement: A Theoretical Framework'', PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara. | |||
* Jason Burke, ''Al Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam,'' Penguin, 2004 | |||
* |
* Jason Burke, ''Al Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam'', Penguin, 2004 {{ISBN?}} | ||
* Gilles Kepel, ''Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam,'' I.B. Tauris, 2003 | |||
== External links == | |||
* Vincenzo Oliveti, ''Terror's Source: The Ideology of Wahhabi-Salafism and its Consequences,'' Amadeus Books, 2002 | |||
* {{wiktionary inline}} | |||
{{Religious slurs}} | |||
==External links== | |||
* | aljazeera.net | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* – at Rotten.com | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 18:14, 23 December 2024
Radical Islamist ideology
Part of a series on Islamism |
---|
Fundamentals |
Ideologies Islamic fundamentalism |
Concepts |
Influences |
MovementsScholastic
Political
Militant
|
Key texts |
Heads of state |
Key ideologues
|
Criticism of Islamism |
Related topics |
Politics portal |
Takfiri (Arabic: تَكْفِيرِيّ, takfīriyy lit. "excommunicational") is an Arabic and Islamic term denoting a Muslim who excommunicates one of his/her coreligionists, i.e. who accuses another Muslim of being an apostate.
Since according to the traditional interpretations of Islamic law (sharīʿa) the punishment for apostasy is the death penalty, and potentially a cause of strife and violence within the Muslim community (Ummah), an ill-founded accusation of takfīr is considered a major forbidden act (haram) in Islamic jurisprudence, with one ḥadīth declaring that one who wrongly declares another Muslim to be an unbeliever is himself an apostate. Takfirism has been called a "minority ideology" which "advocates the killing of other Muslims declared to be unbelievers".
The accusation itself is called takfīr, derived from the Arabic word kāfir ("unbeliever"), and is described as when "one who is a Muslim is declared impure." An apostate is a murtad. In principle, in mainstream Sunnī Islam, the only group authorized to declare another Muslim a kāfir are the scholars of Islam (Ulama), and this is only done if all the prescribed legal precautions have been taken. Traditionally, the declaration of takfīr was used against self-professed Muslims who denied one or more of the basic tenets of Islam. Throughout the history of Islam, Islamic denominations and movements such as Shīʿa Muslims and the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community have been accused of takfīr and labeled as kuffār ("unbelievers") by Sunnī Muslims, becoming victims of religious discrimination, violence, and persecution perpetrated against them over the centuries. The term Takfiri has also been pejoritavely deployed by Shia jihadist groups to demonise and justify violence against Sunni Muslims.
In the history of Islam, a sect originating in the 7th century CE known as the Kharijites carried out takfīr against both Sunnī and Shīʿa Muslims, and became the main source of insurrection against the early caliphates for centuries. Since the latter half of the 20th century, takfīr has also been used for "sanctioning violence against leaders of Islamic states" who do not enforce sharia or are otherwise "deemed insufficiently religious". This arbitrary application of takfīr has become a "central ideology" of insurgent Wahhabi-Salafi jihadist extremist and terrorist groups, particularly al-Qaeda and ISIL/ISIS/IS/Daesh, who have drawn on the ideas of the medieval Islamic scholars Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Kathir, and those of the modern Islamist ideologues Sayyid Qutb and Abul A'la Maududi. The practice of takfīr has been denounced as deviant by the mainstream branches of Islam and mainstream Muslim scholars such as Hasan al-Hudaybi (d. 1977) and Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
Issues and criticisms
Traditionally, Muslims have agreed that someone born a Muslim or converting to Islam who rejects the faith is deserving of capital punishment, provided legal precautions have been taken (the accused being educated in their error, given a chance to repent, evaluated for mental soundness, etc.). This is true in the case of a self-professed apostates, or "extreme, persistent and aggressive" proponents of religious innovation (bidʻah). From the 19th century onwards, liberal/modernist/reformist Muslims have complained that this capital punishment is a violation of the principle of no compulsion in religion, and only those guilty of treason should be executed. Revivalist and conservative Muslims see the capital punishment as a matter of obedience to the Islamic law (sharīʿa) and protection of the faith. Since the 20th century, capital punishment is seldom applied by the state in Muslim-majority countries; instead, it is frequently carried out by "vigilantes" who believe that they are executing their "individual duty". (See also: Apostasy in Islam#In practice in the recent past)
There is also agreement among Muslims in the case of declaring takfīr upon orthodox, self-professed Muslims. Generally, Muslims agree that the declaration of takfīr is "so serious, and mistakes therein are so grave", that great care is needed, and that if the accused is actually a believing Muslim, then the act of accusing makes the accuser themself guilty of apostasy. There is also a belief shared by various Muslim scholars which assert that the practice of takfīr may be dangerous for the entire Muslim community (Ummah); they believe that if takfīr is "used wrongly or unrestrainedly", retaliation could lead down a slippery slope of "discord and sedition" to mutual excommunication and "complete disaster." The Sunnī Islamist militant group and Salafi-jihadist terrorist organization ISIL/ISIS/IS/Daesh, for example, have declared takfīr not only upon Shīʿa Muslims and Sufi Muslims but also against rival insurgent Islamist groups (although they are also Salafi-jihadists) and all those who oppose its policy of enslaving and killing Shīʿa Muslims and Non-Muslim religious minorities, particularly Christians and Yazidis.
What to do in a situation where self-professed Muslim(s) disagree with other Muslims on an important doctrinal point is more controversial. In the case of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community—who are accused of denying the basic tenet of the Finality of Prophethood—the Islamic Republic of Pakistan declares in Ordinance XX of the Second Amendment to its Constitution, that Ahmadi Muslims are Non-Muslims and deprives them of religious rights. All religious seminaries and madrasas in Pakistan belonging to different sects of Islam have prescribed essential reading materials specifically targeted at refuting Ahmadiyya beliefs. Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, the political and religious persecution of Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan has sparked several large riots (in 1953 and 1974) and bombings (in 2010) who have targeted and killed hundreds of Ahmadi Muslims in the country.
Takfiri, Khawarij
The importance of takfir in modern Islamic political thought, insurgent Islamist groups, and religiously-motivated terrorist attacks on civilians is underscored by the fact that as of 2017 (according to Anthony Cordesman and the CSIS), "the overwhelming majority" of violent terrorist attacks had occurred in Muslim-majority countries and the "primary victims" of these attacks were Muslims.
Studying the largest Arab country, Egypt, Elie Podeh distinguishes between three groups: conservative Islamists, "jihadi" Muslims, and takfiri. All three see the government and society sadly lacking in piety and in need of Islamification and restoration of sharia law. Conservative Islamists do not support armed struggle against the secular government, whereas jihadist and takfiri groups do, and invoke the concepts of jahiliyya (regression of Muslims to pre-Islamic ignorance), al-hakimiyya (God's sovereignty), and al-takfir (branding as apostate). However, according to Podeh's formulation, takfiri groups are more extreme, and regard not just some Muslims but the whole of Egyptian society as kafir, and consequently completely disengage from it. Podeh also points out that unlike jihadists, takfiri groups make no distinction between the regime and the ordinary population when employing violence.
Some political scientists and scholars of Middle Eastern studies (such as Jacob Zenna, Zacharias Pier, and Dale Eikmeier) argue that the accusation of takfir may serve as a sort of ingenious "legal loophole" for Islamist insurgents, allowing them to bypass the sharia injunction against imprisoning or killing fellow Muslims. Since it is very difficult to overthrow governments without killing their (self-proclaimed) Muslim rulers and officials or any Muslim opposing the Islamists, and since enforcing sharia is the insurgents raison d'être, the prohibition against killing Muslims is a major impediment against taking power. But if the enemy can be made to be not Muslims but unbelievers claiming to be Muslims, the prohibition is turned into a religious obligation.
Takfiris have also been classified by some scholars as violent offshoots of the Salafi movement. Although most Salafis oppose terrorism or violence within the Muslim community (Ummah), Takfiris condone acts of violence as legitimate methods of achieving religious or political goals. Middle East expert Robert Baer has written that
"takfiri generally refers to a Wahabi Salafi who looks at the world in black-and-white; there are true believers and then there are nonbelievers, with no shades in between. A takfiri's mission is to re-create the Caliphate according to a literal interpretation of the Qur'an."
Takfiris also reject the traditional Muslim duty to obey one's legitimate rulers in all manners that do not contradict the Sharia, as sedition is viewed as a great danger to a nation. However, takfiris consider all political authority that does not abide by their interpretation of Islam to be illegitimate and therefore apostate; this view closely mirrors Qutb's views on what he perceived as jahiliyyah in the Muslim world. As such, violence against such regimes is considered legitimate.
The term takfiri was brought to a more public prominence by the BBC investigative journalist Peter Taylor in his 2005 BBC television series The New Al Qaeda.
Suicide
Takfiri views on suicide also differ significantly from those of orthodox Muslims. In mainstream Islam, suicide is considered a major sin, but Takfiris believe that one who deliberately kills himself whilst attempting to kill a religious enemy is a martyr (shahid) and therefore goes straight to heaven without having to wait for the Day of Judgement. According to this doctrine, all sins of the martyrs are absolved when they die in martyrdom, allowing carte blanche for the indiscriminate killing of civilians and non-combatants.
Historical background
In the "early times" of Islam, "charges of apostasy" were also "not unusual, and ... the terms 'unbeliever' and 'apostate' were commonly used in religious polemic" in hopes of silencing the deviant and prodding the lax back to the straight path. Classical manuals of jurisprudence in Islam sometimes provided fairly detailed lists of practices and beliefs that would render a Muslim an apostate that went far beyond infractions of the basic tenets of Islam. For example, Madjma' al-Anhur by Hanafi scholar Shaykhzadeh (d.1667 CE), declared such misdeeds as "to assert the createdness of the Quran, to translate the Quran, ... to pay respect to non-Muslims, to celebrate Nowruz the Iranian New Year", would make a Muslim an unbeliever. Nonetheless, those accused of apostasy were usually left "unmolested", and in general executions for apostasy were "rare in Islamic history", unless the violation was "extreme, persistent and aggressive".
According to researcher Trevor Stanley, the precedent "for the declaration of takfir against a leader" came from the medieval Islamic scholar Taqi al-Din Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328 CE), who supported the Mamluks in their jihad against the invading Central Asian Mongols. After the Mongols converted to Islam, another cause was sought for the jihad against them. In his famous fatwa, Ibn Taymiyyah reasoned that since the Mongols followed their traditional Yassa law rather than Sharia (Islamic law), they were not really Muslims, and since non-Muslims who called themselves Muslims were apostates, the Mongols should be killed. Ibn Taymiyya wrote that he "was among the strictest of people in forbidding that a specific person be accuse of unbelief, immorality or sin until proof from the Messenger has been established", yet he "regularly accused his opponents of outright unbelief and has become a source of inspiration to many Islamist and even takfiri movements."
Kharijites
Main article: KhawarijIslamic extremism dates back to the early history of Islam with the emergence of the Kharijites in the 7th century CE. The original schism between Kharijites, Sunnis, and Shiʿas among Muslims was disputed over the political and religious succession to the guidance of the Muslim community (Ummah) after the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. From their essentially political position, the Kharijites developed extreme doctrines that set them apart from both mainstream Sunni and Shiʿa Muslims. Shiʿas believe Ali ibn Abi Talib is the true successor to Muhammad, while Sunnis consider Abu Bakr to hold that position. The Kharijites broke away from both the Shiʿas and the Sunnis during the First Fitna (the first Islamic Civil War); they were particularly noted for adopting a radical approach to takfīr (excommunication), whereby they declared both Sunni and Shiʿa Muslims to be either infidels (kuffār) or false Muslims (munāfiḳūn), and therefore deemed them worthy of death for their perceived apostasy.
The Islamic tradition traces the origin of the Kharijities to the battle between 'Ali and Mu'awiya at Siffin in 657 CE. When 'Ali was faced with a military stalemate and agreed to submit the dispute to arbitration, some of his party withdrew their support from him. "Judgement belongs to God alone" (لاَ حُكْكْ إلَا لِلّهِ) became the slogan of these secessionists. They also called themselves al-Shurat ("the Vendors"), to reflect their willingness to sell their lives in martyrdom.
These original Kharijites opposed both 'Ali and Mu'awiya, and appointed their own leaders. They were decisively defeated by 'Ali, who was in turn assassinated by a Kharijite. Kharijites engaged in guerilla warfare against the Umayyads, but only became a movement to be reckoned with during the Second Fitna (the second Islamic Civil War) when they at one point controlled more territory than any of their rivals. The Kharijites were, in fact, one of the major threats to Ibn al-Zubayr's bid for the caliphate; during this time they controlled Yamama and most of southern Arabia, and captured the oasis town of al-Ta'if.
The Azariqa, considered to be the extreme faction of the Kharijites, controlled parts of western Iran under the Umayyads until they were finally put down in 699 CE. The more moderate Ibadi Kharijites were longer-lived, continuing to wield political power in North and East Africa and in eastern Arabia during the 'Abbasid period. Because of their readiness to declare any opponent as apostate, the extreme Kharijites tended to fragment into small groups. One of the few points that the various Kharijite splinter groups held in common was their view of the caliphate, which differed from other Muslim theories on two points.
- First, they were principled egalitarians, holding that any pious Muslim ("even an Ethiopian slave") can become Caliph and that family or tribal affiliation is inconsequential. The only requirements for leadership are piety and acceptance by the community.
- Second, they agreed that it is the duty of the believers to depose any leader who falls into error. This second principle had profound implications for Kharijite theology. Applying these ideas to the early history of the caliphate, Kharijites only accept Abu Bakr and 'Umar as legitimate caliphs. Of 'Uthman's caliphate they recognize only the first six years as legitimate, and they reject 'Ali altogether.
By the time that Ibn al-Muqaffa' wrote his political treatise early in the 'Abbasid period, the Kharijites were no longer a significant political threat, at least in the Islamic heartlands. The memory of the menace they had posed to Muslim unity and of the moral challenge generated by their pious idealism still weighed heavily on Muslim political and religious thought, however. Even if the Kharijites could no longer threaten, their ghosts still had to be answered. The Ibadis are the only Kharijite group to surivive into modern times.
ibn Abdul-Wahhāb
The 18th-century Islamic revivalist Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and 20th-century Muslim authors Maulana Maududi and Sayyid Qutb have referred to Ibn Taymiyyah when condemning self-proclaimed Muslims as not being real Muslims. ibn Abd al-Wahhab condemned the practices of Shia, Sufi and other Muslims as bid'a (innovation of the religion), and ibn Abd al-Wahhab's followers slew many Muslims for allegedly pagan (kufr) practices.
(In his books Risālah Aslu Dīn Al-Islām wa Qā’idatuhu and Kashf ush-Shubuhaat (Clarification of the Doubts), ibn Abdul-Wahhāb makes an explicit takfir of people who invoke or implore for help from dead people (such as the prophet and his family) or, in other words, intercede for themselves with God by seeking intercession from the prophet and his family.)
Colonial era and after
In the colonial and post-colonial Muslim world the influence and pressure of Western powers meant that not only was apostasy rare in practice, but that it was (contrary to sharia) abolished as a crime punishable by death in state statutes of law (the West also encouraged establishing laws giving equal rights to women and non-Muslims in violation of sharia). Some Muslims (such as the cleric 'Adb al-Qadir 'Awdah) responded by preaching that if the state would not kill apostates then it had "become a duty of individual Moslems" to do so, and gave advice on how to plead in court to avoid punishment after being arrested for such a murder.
Sayyid Qutb
Main article: Sayyid QutbSayyid Qutb could be said to have founded the actual movement of radical Islam. Unlike the other Islamic thinkers that have been mentioned above, Qutb was not an apologist. He was a prominent leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and a highly influential Islamist ideologue, and the first to articulate these anathemizing principles in his magnum opus Fī ẓilāl al-Qurʾān (In the shade of the Qurʾān) and his 1966 manifesto Maʿālim fīl-ṭarīq (Milestones), which lead to his execution by the Egyptian government. Other Salafi movements in the Middle East and North Africa and across the Muslim world adopted many of his Islamist principles. According to Qutb, the Muslim community has been extinct for several centuries and reverted to jahiliyah (the pre-Islamic age of ignorance) because those who call themselves Muslims have failed to follow the sharia law. In order to restore Islam, bring back its days of glory, and free the Muslims from the clasps of ignorance, Qutb proposed the shunning of modern society, establishing a vanguard modeled after the early Muslims, preaching, and bracing oneself for poverty or even death as preparation for jihad against what he perceived as jahili government/society, and overthrow them. Qutbism, the radical Islamist ideology derived from the ideas of Qutb, was denounced by many prominent Muslim scholars as well as other members of the Muslim Brotherhood, like Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
Late 20th and early 21st century
Qutb and insurgents
By the mid 1990s, one list of Qutb-inspired groups included al-Jihaad al-Islami, Takfir wal-Hijra, Jund Allah, al-Jihaad, Tanzim al-Faniyyah al-Askariyyah—all of which were fighting violent insurgencies.
While Qutb declared that the Islamic world had "long ago vanished from existence" and that true Muslims would have to confront "arrogant, mischievous, criminal and degraded people" in the struggle to restore Islam, he had not specifically stated that the self-professed Muslim "authorities of the jahili system" were apostates (or whether they should all be killed)—but his followers have.
Ayman al-Zawahiri, "jihad's main ideologist," (originally of al-Jihaad al-Islami aka Egyptian Islamic Jihad), and the current leader of al-Qaeda, paid homage to Qutb in his book Knights under the Prophet's Banner Al Qaeda is commonly described as seeking to overthrow the "apostate" regimes in the Middle East and replace them with "true" Islamic governments, and having a "habit" of denouncing Muslims who did not "accept a narrow interpretation" of Sunni Islam as "non-believers and legitimate targets."
Shukri Mustaf, founder of Jama'at al-Muslimin (known to the public as Takfir wal-Hijra) had been in prison with Qutb, and was a "disciple" of his.
The Takfir of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant may be more rooted in Wahhabism and Ibn Abd al-Wahhab than Qutb, but "one famous quote" from him "has been seen written on walls and has also appeared repeatedly in IS texts: 'Whoever does not pay the price of jihad, shall pay the price of abstention'". Another source writes that the "roots" of ISIL's "takfiri" ideology "can be found in the Khawarij's view, and in the writings of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, and Sayyid Qutb."
Egypt
In Qutb's home country of Egypt in the 1980s and 1990s many authorities of "the jahili system" were attacked and killed (along with non-Muslims such as tourists and Christians) by extremists.
In 1974, 100 members of the "Islamic Liberation Organization", led by one Salih Sirriya, stormed the armory of the Military Technical College in Cairo, seizing weapons and vehicles, as part of a plan to kill President Anwar El Sadat and other top Egyptian officials.
In 1977, the group Jama'at al-Muslimin (known to the public as Takfir wal-Hijra for its strategy of takfiring Muslim society and going into psychological hijra/exile from it), kidnapped and later killed an Islamic scholar and former Egyptian government minister Muhammad al-Dhahabi. The group's founder, Shukri Mustaf—who had been imprisoned with Sayyid Qutb, and was now one of Qutb's "most radical" disciples—believed that not only were the Egyptian President and his government officials apostates, but so was "Egyptian society as a whole" because it was "not fighting the Egyptian government and had thus accepted rule by non-Muslims". Hundreds of members of the group were arrested and Shukri Mustafa was executed but (according to journalist Robin Wright), the group reorganized with thousands of members. Later its ex-members went on to help assassinate Anwar Sadat, and be involved in the Algerian Civil War and Al-Qaeda.
In 1981, President Sadat was successfully assassinated (along with six diplomats) by members of the Tanzim al-Jihad movement.
During the 1990s, a violent Islamic insurgency in Egypt, primarily perpetrated by Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya, targeted police, government officials (but also civilians including tourists). In one particularly bloody year (1993), 1106 persons were killed or wounded, and "several senior police officials and their bodyguards were shot dead in daylight ambushes."
Algerian Civil War
But in addition to the authorities of the jahili system, civilians also were targeted. Unlike the scholars of classical Islam, extremists not only expanded the definition of what constituted an apostate, but enforced its penalty. Along with other traditional socio-economic-ethnic-military-personality factors of insurgency, takfir played a part in the bloodshed of extremist violence.
In the brutal 1991–2002 Algerian Civil War between the Algerian Government and various Islamist rebel groups, takfir was known to be declared by the hardline Islamist GIA (Armed Islamic Group of Algeria). Starting in April 1998, a series of massacres in villages or neighborhoods killed tens, and sometimes hundreds, of civilians without disregard to the age and sex of victims. Although the government had infiltrated the insurgents and it is thought by many that security forces as well as Islamists were involved in massacres, the GIA amir, Antar Zouabri claimed credit for two massacres (Rais and Bentalha massacres), calling the killings an "offering to God" and declaring impious the victims and all Algerians who had not joined its ranks. He declared that "except for those who are with us, all others are apostates and deserving of death," Between 100,000 and 200,000 were ultimately killed in the war.
Afghanistan
In August 1998 the Taliban insurgents slaughtered 8000 mostly Shia Hazara non-combatants in Mazar-i-Sharif, Afghanistan. The Taliban indicated revenge, or ethnic hatred may have been a motivation for the slaughter, but comments by Mullah Niazi, the Taliban commander of the attack and newly installed governor, also indicated that takfir may also have been a motive. Niazi declared in a number of post-slaughter speeches from Mosques in Mazar-i-Sharif: "Hazaras are not Muslim, they are Shi’a. They are kofr . The Hazaras killed our force here, and now we have to kill Hazaras. ... You either accept to be Muslims or leave Afghanistan. ...".
Ironically, the Taliban seemed to have backed off the "Hazaras are not Muslim" approach and were later denounced by the ISIS for their tolerance of Shia. The 13th issue of the ISIS magazine Dabiq (19 January 2016) attacked the Taliban for "considering the Rāfidah to be their brothers and publicly denouncing those who target the Rāfidah:" Dabiq quoted "Abdullāh al-Wazīr, the official correspondent of the nationalist Taliban media committee":
The Shī’ah are Muslims ... Everyone who says there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is Allah's Messenger is a Muslim. The sects are many and Allah will decide between them on Judgment Day.
as evidence of Taliban wrongdoing.
Al Qaeda
Al Qaeda shared some of the takfir beliefs of ISIS, with, for example senior leader Ayman al-Zawahiri denigrating Shi’a as "a religious school based on excess and falsehood", but al-Zawahiri (and Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi) also opposed attacks on Shia as a distraction from the more important goal of defeating the "far enemy", the United States. Attacks "on ordinary Shi’a, their mosques, and the mausoleum of their Imams" would "lift the burden from the Americans by diverting the mujahedeen to the Shi’a". What did provoke it to takfir and "legitimize targeting" was the fighting by Muslim soldiers as the allies of the West against Muslims.
War in Iraq (2013–2017) and aftermath
From its inception in 2013 to 2021, directly or through affiliated groups, ISIS (also Daesh or Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), "has been responsible for 27,947 terrorist deaths". The majority of these have been Muslims "because it has regarded them as kafir".
Anti-Shia
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who founded Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in Iraq in 1999, is said to have turned "an insurgency against US troops" in Iraq "into a Shia–Sunni civil war". He saw himself as fighting not just the occupying United States military, but what he called "the sects of apostasy" (i.e. Shia Muslims). In September 2005 he declared "all-out war" on Shi'ites in Iraq after the Iraqi government offensive on insurgents in the Sunni town of Tal Afar.
The 13th issue of the ISIS magazine Dabiq dedicates "dozens of pages" were devoted "to attacking and explaining the necessity of killing Shia", who the group refers to by the label Rafidah.
Initiated by a sly Jew, are an apostate sect drowning in worship of the dead, cursing the best companions and wives of the Prophet, spreading doubt on the very basis of the religion (the Qur’ān and the Sunnah), defaming the very honor of the Prophet, and preferring their "twelve" imāms to the prophets and even to Allah! ...Thus, the Rāfidah are mushrik apostates who must be killed wherever they are to be found, until no Rāfidī walks on the face of earth, even if the jihād claimants despise such...
Broader takfir
In addition to takfiring Shia, from about 2003 to 2006 al-Zarqawi expanded "the range of behavior" that could make large number of self-proclaimed Muslims apostates: including "in certain cases, selling alcohol or drugs, wearing Western clothes or shaving one's beard, voting in an election—even for a Muslim candidate—and being lax about calling other people apostates".
Al-Zarqawi was killed in 2006 the successor of the Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad—the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, aka ISIL or Daesh, expanded takfir still further. ISIL not only called for the revival of slavery of non-Muslims (specifically of the Yazidi minority group), but takfired any Muslim who disagreed with their policy.
Yazidi women and children divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the Sinjar operations ... Enslaving the families of the kuffar and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet ... and thereby apostatizing from Islam.
Starting in 2013, the ISIL began "encouraging takfir of Muslims deemed insufficiently pure in regard of tawhid (monotheism)". The Taliban were found "to be "a 'nationalist' movement, all too tolerant" of Shia. In 2015 ISIL "pronounced Jabhat al-Nusrat—then al-Qaida's affiliate in Syria—an apostate group."
One of ISIL's "most infamous large-scale killings" was the June 2014 Camp Speicher massacre in Iraq, "when the group murdered more than 1,500 Shi’a army cadets in Tikrit". In a film made by ISIL about the Camp Speicher massacre, a narrator states: "All are apostates who have come from cities of apostates to kill Sunnis here, we have more than 2,000 of them."
Attacks on Sufis
Along with Shia, ISIL and to a lesser extent Al-Qaeda have takfired Sufi Muslims, considering their the shrines and these living saints a violation of monotheism. The deadliest attack by ISIL on Sufis, and "the worst terrorist attack in Egypt's modern history", occurred on 24 November 2017, when approximately 40 gunmen attacked the al-Rawda mosque (associated with the Jaririya Sufi order) near El-Arish Sinai during Friday prayers. 311 people were killed and at least 122 injured. While no group claimed responsibility for the attack, the Islamic State's Wilayat Sinai branch was strongly suspected. On 25 November, the Egyptian public prosecutor's office, citing interviews with survivors, said the attackers brandished the Islamic State flag. In an interview in the Islamic State magazine Rumiyah (January 2017 issue five) an insurgent Islamic State commander condemned Sufi practices and identified the district where the attack occurred as one of three areas where Sufis live in Sinai that Islamic State intended to "eradicate."
Syrian civil war
Writing in 2014, Aaron Y. Zelin and Phillip Smyth argue that the combatants in the Syrian Civil War have used sectarian language to "cast one another" as non-Muslims/infidels, dehumanizing the enemy and intensifying the bloodshed and mayhem. The Shia Hizbollah, for example had successfully "tarred all shades of the opposition, and indeed sometimes all Sunnis", with the brush of "takfiri". The Sunnis and Shiites antagonism has spread from Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, so that "there have been incidents in Australia, Azerbaijan, Britain, and Egypt". Well-known cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi, often branded as "moderate," declared Nusayris (aka Alawiyya) of Syria bigger infidels than even the Jews or Christians in a conference in June 2013 in Cairo (a conference that called for jihad in Syria and was attended by the Grand Imam of al-Azhar). Indications that executions of the enemy may have religious motivation came from an October 2013 video clip where Shiite Islamist fighters executed alleged captured Syrian rebels with the claim by one of the shooters that: "We are performing our taklif and we are not seeking personal vengeance."
Boko Haram in Nigeria
According to researchers Jacob Zenna and Zacharias Pier, takfir has been a major part of the focus of Boko Haram under the leadership of Abubakar Shekau.
after 2010 ... Shekau, believed that jihad was obligatory and that not actively joining his jihad was tantamount to apostasy. This did not mean Shekau actively killed anyone after he announced jihad and renamed the group "JAS" in 2010. Rather, there was a "priority scale" with Christians, the government, and publicly anti-JAS Muslim preachers targeted first. This also meant any Muslims killed collaterally were not a concern since they were "guilty" for not having joined his jihad. ... October 2010, ... assassinations targeting Muslim religious leaders, especially Salafists who opposed JAS's religious interpretation, as well as civil servants, became an almost weekly occurrence in northeastern Nigeria. In addition to this, prisons, banks, churches and beer halls also were common targets of attack
The policy led to a schism in the group, and after Shekau ordered an "urban invasion" in Kano in 2012 where "up to 200 people" were killed, a splinter group called "Ansaru" left, complaining of the excessive killing of Muslims.
See also
References
Explanatory notes
- according to Jamileh Kadivar based on estimates from Global Terrorism Database, 2020; Herrera, 2019; Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights & United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) Human Rights Office, 2014; Ibrahim, 2017; Obeidallah, 2014; 2015
Citations
- Hunwick, Ed; Hunwick, J. O. (2000). "Takfīr". In Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch.; Bearman, P. J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Vol. 10. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_COM_1154. ISBN 978-9004161214.
- Adang, Camilla (2001). "Belief and Unbelief: Choice or Destiny?". In McAuliffe, Jane Dammen (ed.). Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān. Vol. I. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1875-3922_q3_EQCOM_00025. ISBN 978-90-04-14743-0.
- ^ Poljarevic, Emin (2021). "Theology of Violence-oriented Takfirism as a Political Theory: The Case of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)". In Cusack, Carole M.; Upal, M. Afzal (eds.). Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements. Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion. Vol. 21. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 485–512. doi:10.1163/9789004435544_026. ISBN 978-9004435544. ISSN 1874-6691.
- ^ Blanchard, Christopher (28 January 2009). "Islam: Sunnis and Shia" (PDF). fpc.state.gov. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 May 2022. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
- ^ Karawan, Ibrahim A. (1995). "Takfīr". In John L. Esposito. The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Brown, Michael (2010). Contending with Terrorism. p. 89.
- Shiraz Maher, Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea, Penguin UK (2017), p. 75
- ^ Badara, Mohamed; Nagata, Masaki; Tueni, Tiphanie (June 2017). "The Radical Application of the Islamist Concept of Takfir" (PDF). Arab Law Quarterly. 31 (2). Leiden: Brill Publishers: 134–162. doi:10.1163/15730255-31020044. ISSN 1573-0255. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2021.
- ^ Kepel, Gilles; Jihad: the Trail of Political Islam, London: I.B. Tauris, 2002, p. 31
- ^ Baele, Stephane J. (October 2019). Giles, Howard (ed.). "Conspiratorial Narratives in Violent Political Actors' Language" (PDF). Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 38 (5–6). Sage Publications: 706–734. doi:10.1177/0261927X19868494. hdl:10871/37355. ISSN 1552-6526. S2CID 195448888. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
- ^ Rickenbacher, Daniel (August 2019). Jikeli, Gunther (ed.). "The Centrality of Anti-Semitism in the Islamic State's Ideology and Its Connection to Anti-Shiism". Religions. 10 (8: "The Return of Religious Antisemitism?"). Basel, Switzerland: MDPI: 483. doi:10.3390/rel10080483. ISSN 2077-1444.
- Ghasemi, Faezeh (2020). Anti-Shiism Discourse (PhD). University of Tehran.
• Ghasemi, Faezeh (2017). "Anti-Shiite and Anti-Iranian Discourses in ISIS Texts". Discourse. 11 (3): 75–96.
• Matthiesen, Toby (21 July 2015). "The Islamic State Exploits Entrenched Anti-Shia Incitement". Sada. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. - ^ Uddin, Asma T. (2014). "A Legal Analysis of Ahmadi Persecution in Pakistan". In Kirkham, David M. (ed.). State Responses to Minority Religions. Ashgate Inform Series on Minority Religions and Spiritual Movements. Farnham, UK and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing/Routledge. pp. 81–98. ISBN 978-1-4724-1647-6. LCCN 2013019344.
- Siegel, Alexandra (December 2015). "Sectarian Twitter Wars: Sunni-Shia Conflict and Cooperation in the Digital Age" (PDF). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. p. 6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 May 2023.
- Y. Zelin, Smyth, Aaron, Phillip (29 January 2014). "The Vocabulary of Sectarianism". The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Archived from the original on 1 February 2022.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Izutsu, Toshihiko (2006) . "The Infidel (Kāfir): The Khārijites and the origin of the problem". The Concept of Belief in Islamic Theology: A Semantic Analysis of Imān and Islām. Tokyo: Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies at Keio University. pp. 1–20. ISBN 9839154702.
- ^ "Takfiri". Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Archived from the original on January 17, 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
- Nedza, Justyna (2016). "The Sum of Its Parts: The State as Apostate in Contemporary Saudi Militant Islamism". In Adang, Camilla; Ansari, Hassan; Fierro, Maribel; Schmidtke, Sabine (eds.). Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr. Islamic History and Civilization. Vol. 123. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 304–326. doi:10.1163/9789004307834_013. ISBN 978-9004307834. ISSN 0929-2403.
- ^ Badara, Mohamed; Nagata, Masaki (November 2017). "Modern Extremist Groups and the Division of the World: A Critique from an Islamic Perspective". Arab Law Quarterly. 31 (4). Leiden: Brill Publishers: 305–335. doi:10.1163/15730255-12314024. ISSN 1573-0255.
- ^ Jalal, Ayesha (2009). "Islam Subverted? Jihad as Terrorism". Partisans of Allah: Jihad in South Asia. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 239–240. doi:10.4159/9780674039070-007. ISBN 978-0674039070. S2CID 152941120.
- Oliveti, Vincenzo. Terror's Source: The Ideology of Wahhabi-Salafism and its Consequences. Birmingham: Amadeus Books, 2002 .
- Julie Rajan, V. G. (2015). "Islamism, Al Qaeda, and Takfir". Al Qaeda's Global Crisis: The Islamic State, Takfir, and the Genocide of Muslims. Contemporary Terrorism Studies. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 44–102. ISBN 978-1138221802. LCCN 2014031954.
- ^ Lewis, Bernard (1995). The Middle East: a Brief History of the Last 2000 Years. Touchstone. p. 229. ISBN 978-0684832807.
- ^ Wood, Graeme (March 2015). "What ISIS Really Wants". The Atlantic. Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on 16 February 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
- ^ "Persecution of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan: An Analysis Under International Law and International Relations". Archived 17 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol 16, September 2003.
"Eight die in Pakistan sect attack" Archived 30 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News
"Sect offices closed in Pakistan" Archived 2 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News - Rahman, Tariq: "Denizens of Alien Worlds: A Survey of the Education System of Pakistan". Archived 16 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine Contemporary South Asia, 2004. p. 15.
- Cordesman, Anthony (2017). Islam and the patterns in terrorism and violent extremism. Center for strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
- ^ Kadivar, Jamileh (May 18, 2020). "Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh's Media". Contemporary Review of the Middle East. 7 (3): 259–285. doi:10.1177/2347798920921706. S2CID 219460446.
- "Egypt's Struggle against the Militant Islamic Groups" by Elie Podeh. in Religious Radicalism in the Greater Middle East, edited by Efraim Inbar, Bruce Maddy-Weitzman, Routledge, 2013
- ^ Zenna, Jacob; Pierib, Zacharias (Summer 2017). "How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization". Journal for Deradicalization (11): 288. ISSN 2363-9849. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
- Eikmeier, Dale (Spring 2007). "Qutbism: An Ideology of Islamic-fascism". Parameters: U.S. Army War College Journal: 89. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
- Oliveti, Terror's Source, (2002), p. 45
- Baer, Robert (2008). The Devil We Know. New York: Crown. ISBN 978-0307408648.
- Esposito, John L.; Unholy War: Terror in the Name of Islam, Oxford University Press 2002, pp. 59–60.
- "The New Al-Qaeda: Madrid bombings". 21 July 2005 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
- Oliveti, Terror's Source, (2002), pp. 47–48.
- Shaykhzadeh, Madjma' al-anhur (1, pp. 629–637); cited in Peters, Rudolph; Vries, Gert J. J. De (1976). "Apostasy in Islam". Die Welt des Islams. 17 (1/4): 1–25. doi:10.2307/1570336. JSTOR 1570336.
- Elliott, Andrea (26 March 2006). "In Kabul, a Test for Shariah". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 11 January 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
- Stanley, Trevor. "Kufr – Kaffir – Takfir – Takfiri". Perspectives on World History and Current Events. Retrieved 30 Dec 2013.
- Ansari, Hassan; Fierro, Maribel; Schmidtke, Sabine (2016). "Introduction". In Adang, Camilla; Ansari, Hassan; Fierro, Maribel; Schmidtke, Sabine (eds.). Accusations of Unbelief in Islam: A Diachronic Perspective on Takfīr. Islamic History and Civilization. Vol. 123. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 1–24. doi:10.1163/9789004307834_002. ISBN 978-9004307834. ISSN 0929-2403.
- Khan, Sheema (12 May 2018). "Another battle with Islam's 'true believers'". The Globe and Mail. The Globe and Mail Opinion. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Hasan, Usama (2012). "The Balance of Islam in Challenging Extremism" (PDF). Quiliam Foundation. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 August 2014. Retrieved 2015-11-17.
- ^ Brown, Daniel (2017). A New Introduction to Islam (3rd ed.). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 163–169. ISBN 978-1118953464.
- "Risālah Aslu Dīn Al-Islām wa Qā'idatuhu" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-07-23.
- "IslamicWeb". islamicweb.com.
- Peters, Rudolph; Vries, Gert J. J. De (1976). "Apostasy in Islam". Die Welt des Islams. 17 (1/4): 24. doi:10.2307/1570336. JSTOR 1570336.
- 'Abd al-Qadir 'Awdah, al-tashri al-djina'i al-Islam muqaran bi-al-qanun al-wadi, Bayrut: Dar al-Kitab al-'Arabi, n.d. 2 volumes; v. 1, pp. 535–538; quoted in Peters, Rudolph; Vries, Gert J. J. De (1976). "Apostasy in Islam". Die Welt des Islams. 17 (1/4): 17. doi:10.2307/1570336. JSTOR 1570336.
- ^ Moussalli, Ahmad S. (2012). "Sayyid Qutb: Founder of Radical Islamic Political Ideology". In Akbarzadeh, Shahram (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Political Islam (1st ed.). London and New York: Routledge. pp. 9–26. ISBN 978-1138577824. LCCN 2011025970.
- ^ Cook, David (2015) . "Radical Islam and Contemporary Jihad Theory". Understanding Jihad (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 102–110. ISBN 978-0520287327. JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctv1xxt55.10. LCCN 2015010201.
- Gibril Haddad, “Quietism and End-Time Reclusion in the Qurʾān and Hadith: Al-Nābulusī and His Book Takmīl Al-Nuʿūt within the ʿuzla Genre,” Islamic Sciences 15, no. 2 (2017): pp. 108–109)
- Ahmad S. Moussalli, Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: the Ideological and Political Discourse of Sayyid Qutb, American University of Beirut, 1992, p. 244 al-Jihaad al-Islami, Jama'a al Jihaad, and al-Takfir wa al-Hijrah were Egyptian terrorist groups. There was a Jund Allah in Egypt (Ruthven, Malise, Islam in the World, Penguin, 1982, p. 315 ) and Lebanon (mentioned in Radical Islam : Medieval Theology and Modern Politics, 1985 by Emmanuel Sivan).
- Sayyid Qutb, Milestones, p. 20
- Sayyid Qutb, Milestones, p. 150
- The War for Muslim Minds : Islam and the West, Gilles Kepel, Belknap Press, 2004, pp. 74, 79, 98
- Understanding Terror Networks by Marc Sageman, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004, p. 63
- Byman, Daniel L. (29 April 2015). "Comparing Al Qaeda and ISIS: Different goals, different targets". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
- Kepel, Gilles; Milelli, Jean-Pierre; Hegghammer, Thomas (2008). Al Qaeda in Its Own Words. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-0674028043. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
- ^ "Transcript | Al Qaeda's New Front | Frontline | PBS". www.pbs.org.
- al-Qarawee, Harith Hasan (2016). "The Media, Methods and Messages of the Islamic State's Communication Strategy". In Giusto, Hedwig (ed.). Daesh and the terrorist threat: from the Middle East to Europe (PDF). Belgium: FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies. p. 102. Retrieved 20 December 2020.
- Kepel, Gilles, Muslim Extremism in Egypt, English translation published by University of California Press, 1986, p. 93
- Mili, Hayder (June 29, 2006). "Jihad Without Rules: The Evolution of al-Takfir wa al-Hijra". Terrorism Monitor. 4 (13). Retrieved 18 December 2015.
- Wright, Robin Sacred Rage, 1985, p. 181
- Rabasa, Angel (2009). Radical Islam in East Africa. Rand Corporation. p. 70. ISBN 978-0833046796.
- Islamist Terrorism and Democracy in the Middle East By Katerina Dalacoura, p. 113
- "Armed Conflict Year Index". Onwar.com. Retrieved 2015-07-11.
- Murphy, Caryle Passion for Islam : Shaping the Modern Middle East: the Egyptian Experience, Scribner, 2002, pp. 82–83
- Nesroullah Yous; Salima Mellah (2000). Qui a tué a Bentalha?. La Découverte, Paris. ISBN 978-2707133328.
- Entre menace, censure et liberté: La presse privé algérienne se bat pour survivre, 31 March 1998
- Kepel, Jihad, 2002: pp. 272–273
- El Watan, 21 January (quoted in Willis 1996)
- Ajami, Fouad (27 January 2010). "The Furrows of Algeria". New Republic. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
- "The Massacre in Mazar-i Sharif". www.HRW.org. November 1, 1998. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
- ^ Pillalamarri, Akhilesh (29 January 2016). "Revealed: Why ISIS Hates the Taliban". The Diplomat. Retrieved 26 December 2020.
- Al-Zawahiri, A. (2005). "[Letter from al-Zawahiri to al-Zarqawi]" (PDF). Retrieved 10 January 2021.
- Stewart, S. (2017, March 9). Can the Islamic State and Al Qaeda find common ground? Stratfor World View. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/can-islamic-state-and-al-qaeda-find-common-ground; cited in Kadivar, Jamileh (May 18, 2020). "Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh's Media". Contemporary Review of the Middle East. 7 (3): 259–285. doi:10.1177/2347798920921706. S2CID 219460446.
- Anonymous (August 13, 2015). "The Mystery of ISIS". New York Review of Books. LXII (13). Retrieved October 29, 2015.
- "Letter from Zarqawi to bin Laden". January 2004. Archived from the original on January 20, 2016.
- "Al-Zarqawi declares war on Iraqi Shia". Al Jazeera. September 14, 2005. Retrieved October 22, 2009.
- ^ Bunzel, Cole (February 2019). "Ideological Infighting in the Islamic State". Perspectives on Terrorism. 13 (1): 12–21. JSTOR 26590504. Retrieved 17 December 2020.
- Shaheen, K. (30 August 2016). "Up to 15,000 ISIS victims buried in mass graves in Syria and Iraq – survey". The Guardian.
- "Islamic State Releases New Footage Showing Scenes From Massacre of 1,700 Iraqi Troops". Vice news. 12 July 2015. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
- ^ Specia, Megan (24 November 2017). "Who Are Sufi Muslims and Why Do Some Extremists Hate Them?". The New York Times. New York Times. Retrieved 19 December 2020.
- "Death toll in Egypt mosque attack rises to 309". Anadolu Agency. Retrieved 2017-11-28.
- Ian Lee, Laura Smith-Spark and Hamdi Alkhshali. "Egypt hunts for killers after mosque attack leaves at least 235 dead". CNN. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- "The Latest: Egypt says death toll in mosque attack up to 200". Associated Press. 24 November 2017. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- "Gunmen in Egypt mosque attack carried Islamic State flag, prosecutor says". Reuters. Retrieved 25 November 2017.
- Omar Fahmy; Patrick Marke (25 November 2017). "Gunmen in Egypt mosque attack carried Islamic State flag, prosecutor says". Reuters.
- Walsh, Declan; Youssef, Nour (24 November 2017). "Militants Kill 305 at Sufi Mosque in Egypt's Deadliest Terrorist Attack". The New York Times.
- ^ Zelin, Aaron Y.; Smyth, Phillip. "The vocabulary of sectarianism". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 17 September 2014.
Another popular term used by Shiite jihadis for their Sunni enemies has been "takfiri"
- "Lebanon's Hizbollah Turns Eastward to Syria" (PDF). International Crisis Group. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 15 September 2014.
By framing its fight as a preemptive attack on takfiris—those who declare other Muslims to be apostates—Hizbollah has tarred all shades of the opposition, and indeed sometimes all Sunnis, with the same radicalising brush. It has exaggerated, and thereby exacerbated, the sectarianism of the Syrian opposition as well as its own domestic opponents
- Miller, Johnathan (April 2014). "Inside Hezbollah: fighting and dying for a confused cause". Channel Four News. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
those they provocatively and brand "the Takfiris"
- Hizballah Executing Syrian Prisoners? – Analyzing the Video. Brown Moses Blog. 14 October 2013.
- Watts, Michael. 2015. "Insurgent Spaces: Power, Place, and Spectacle in Nigeria" in Merrill, Heather, and Hoffman, Lisa. Spaces of Danger: Culture and Power in the Everyday, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. p. 196.
- Zenna, Jacob; Pierib, Zacharias (Summer 2017). "How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization". Journal for Deradicalization (11): 294. ISSN 2363-9849. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
- Abubakar, Aballahhi. 2012. "The media, politics and Boko blitz". Journal of African Media Studies, 4(1): 97.
- Zenna, Jacob; Pierib, Zacharias (Summer 2017). "How much Takfir is too much Takfir? The Evolution of Boko Haram's Factionalization". Journal for Deradicalization (11): 295. ISSN 2363-9849. Retrieved 6 March 2021.
Further reading
- Sahih al-Bukhari 4.574
- AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, A Critical Study of the Multiple Identities and Disguises of 'al-Muhajiroun': Exposing the Antics of the Cult Followers of Omar Bakri Muhammad Fustuq, Jamiah Media, 2009
- AbdulHaq al-Ashanti and Abu Ameenah AbdurRahman as-Salafi, Abdullah El-Faisal Al-Jamayki: A Critical Study of His Statements, Errors and Extremism in Takfeer, Jamiah Media, 2011
- Reza Aslan (2009), Global Jihadism as a Transnational Movement: A Theoretical Framework, PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara.
- Jason Burke, Al Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam, Penguin, 2004
External links
- The dictionary definition of takfiri at Wiktionary
Religious slurs | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buddhists |
| ||||||||||||
Christians |
| ||||||||||||
Hindus | |||||||||||||
Jains | |||||||||||||
Jews |
| ||||||||||||
Muslims |
| ||||||||||||
Non-believers |
| ||||||||||||
Zoroastrians | |||||||||||||
Atheists |
|