| Revision as of 19:27, 25 September 2014 editVeera Dheera Sooran (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,079 edits →Nayantara: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:53, 11 November 2024 edit undo5.31.240.101 (talk) →Nomination of Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai for deletion: SettingTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around | |||
| |2 = {{BASEPAGENAME}} | |||
| |3 = {{MONTHNAME|12}} 2015 }} | |||
| <!--PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP, OF THE PAGE!!!--> | <!--PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP, OF THE PAGE!!!--> | ||
| <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;color:red;"> <big><big><big><big><big><big>'''VOTE NO'''</big></big></big></big></big></big></div> | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive index|mask=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| |counter = 15 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(10d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=10|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot III}} | |||
| {{archives|small=yes|index=/Archive index}} | |||
| And there is also ]. | |||
| The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing '''the sole task''' for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. '''Vote NO on every candidate''' to prevent further validation of this farce. | |||
| == Kellermensch re-release == | |||
| You have deleted and redirected the article https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kellermensch_(album_re-release)&redirect=no | |||
| It is a re-release, with the debut and EP merged together, and under a completely new label. I agree there may not be that much of a difference, but for the sake chronological releases from ] it should be its own article.{{unsigned|Rakathor}} | |||
| : -- ] 02:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2014 == | |||
| ] HURRY, HURRY, HURRY! | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>| 2003 || '']'' || Gauri || ] ||</nowiki>{{red|'''['''}}<nowiki></nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 00:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes! | |||
| Hi I am bollysitter, you deleted my entry at Mary Kom film page, BollySitter is focused on bringing awareness about Bollywood films to parents in order to help them make an informed decision if their child should watch a particular film. Our reviews are spoiler-free & objective in order to help you determine what you think is appropriate for your children. As an independent group, we provide fair & trustworthy information and tools, as well as a discussion forum, so that families can have a choice and a voice about the media they consume. We added recommended age and family go factor on the page of Mary Kom Film. ] (]) 21:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits. | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki></nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki> in 1991 stated that Juan Huarte de San Juan's 1575 ''Examen de ingenios para las ciencias'' was</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 14:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The most ethical show in the big top! | |||
| <Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br> | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki> publisher = '']'' | date = September 5, 2014 | accessdate = September 6, 2014</nowiki>{{red|''']]'''}}<nowiki>''}}</ref> It's first day box office collection is the 11th highest of 2014<ref name="Ankita Mehta"</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, -2, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 01:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive index|mask=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
| *<nowiki>the name was spelled out, not abbreviated. However, this document was later identified to be a hoax</nowiki>{{red|'''{'''}}<nowiki><ref name="Donovan2011"/> In 1984, a set of documents was allegedly discovered in United States</nowiki> | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| *<nowiki>* Program July 13, 2006</nowiki>{{red|''']'''}}<nowiki></nowiki> | |||
| |counter = 20 | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, 1, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 10:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(10d) | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| |archive = User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| Thx 4 d barnstar :D. WIll do my best to make articles nicer to see and read. ] (]) | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archives|small=yes|index=/Archive index|age=10|bot=MiszaBot III}} | |||
| == Eliezer Yudkowsky == | |||
| And there is also ] | |||
| This has been discussed on the talk page and we decided to keep the material, so.... ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete3 --> ] (]) 03:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :The consensus on the talk page ] speaks for itself. -- ] 03:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm sorry because I did not see the other discussion on the talk page. ] (]) 13:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit on the ] Article== | |||
| Would the film qualify if the directors raised their target? --] (]) 20:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :There needs to be significant reliable secondary-source coverage. ] (]) 20:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Subhash Ghai Career Section == | |||
| Hi, I work in Mukta Arts Ltd and have edited the career section of Subhash Ghai. The details added are correctly updated and have been provided by him only. Mr Ghai needs his recent profile to be displayed on Wiki. Please do not again revert this to the old version. Thanks, ] (]) 06:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Seemant | |||
| == Subhash Ghai - Career section == | |||
| Hi, First of all I am sorry for again editing the page this morning without checking the talk section. Now I have gone through the policies page and fully understand the rules and limitations in editing a page. The source link I used / referred is : http://muktaarts.com/subhash-ghai/. Thanks, ] (]) 06:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for your work on clarifying facts and removing promotional material from the ] article. It doesn't get enough attention from good editors, and there's a constant flood of users trying to whitewash it. ] (]) 14:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Re: Civil Conduct == | |||
| Hello there, | |||
| I thought I'd leave a message here in appreciation for your civil conduct over at ]. I find that bias (even where it is justified) can often compromise encyclopedic standards in articles dealing with hoaxes/conspiracies ''et cetera''. It is refreshing to encounter an editor who can view the matter impartially, despite disagreeing with the claims which are the article's subject. | |||
| ] <sup>•</sup> <sup>]</sup> 20:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| ] | |||
| This kitten would like to hang out with Grumpy Cat and Lil Bub on your talk page for a while. (Careful he's not quite house trained.) | |||
| ] (]) 03:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "]". | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] (]) 06:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Graphology== | |||
| Hi! I saw your comments on the talk page of graphology and I don't agree with you that "claims" regarding the ability of graphology to evaluate personality is "hogwash" and not verifiable. Though not experimented much, there are many peer-reviewed research studies in support of graphology (most in foreign languages) : http://www.igc-grapho.net/research-in-graphology . Here is the link to a review of experimental research conducted in graphology: http://www.amsciepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.1961.12.1.67 . It describes that graphology can reveal personality traits such as intelligence, vitality, neuroticism, anxiety level etc. The journal is "Perceptual and Motor Skills" published by Ammons Scientific. Please do look through ALL studies on a subject before dismissing it as a pseudoscience. | |||
| ] (]) 15:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :If you want to believe in it, I cannot stop you. I, however, will stick with the mainstream scientists and the lack of repeatable claims. -- ] 15:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, you seem to be repeatedly saying that scientific studies have failed to validate "claims" made by graphologists. So, I thought I should say this. Experimental studies in handwriting analysis have been able to conclude that handwriting analysis can predict intelligence, personal interests (especially aesthetic interests), neuroticism, anxiety levels, energy and vitality etc. (A Review of Experimental Research in Graphology: 1933 -1960" (Fluckiger, Fritz A, Tripp, Clarence A & Weinberg, George H: A Review of Experimental Research in Graphology: 1933 - 1960. Perceptual and Motor Skills 12: 67–90) http://www.amsciepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2466/pms.1961.12.1.67 | |||
| Verify for yourself. | |||
| A main reason why some experimental studies failed to validate graphology is the use of untrained professionals. Its like testing whether a medical diagnosis can be made by using judges who have read a book on anatomy and saying that medicine is not valid. Very often researchers did not understand what graphology can and cannot do, so they tended to focus on the wildest claims by marginal graphologists who are not genuine graphologists. | |||
| ] (]) 08:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::those studies are 60 years old and havent been duplicated. -- ] 12:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Research in graphology is not too old to be of value. The human graphic motor sequence has not altered; the anatomical system is the same and the neurological pathways for writing impulses are the same. However, this does not mean that graphologists don't have to replicate research done earlier. There have been studies after these in the 80's (eg: Baruch Nevo studies), 90's (eg: Graphology in Personality Assessment: Reliability and Validity Study A dissertation, Adelphi University 1993, Patricia Wellingham-Johnes studies etc), i the 2000's (eg: Ist an der Graphologie doch etwas dran? Jens F. Beckmann, Gabriele Schmidtand etc.) and studies are still being conducted, most in foreign languages. Astrology or palmistry do not have so many validating studies. According to Misplaced Pages, it does not involve changing the basic laws of nature and has nothing mystical to it and hence, it is not a pseudoscience but rather fits better under the questionable sciences division. | |||
| ] (]) 12:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh please. without any modern confirmations and many disconfirmations after the ancient publications, you have no case. -- ] 13:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| For your information, modern confirmations are definitely there. Many are done as dissertations. I understand that facts and studies cannot convince some people who are highly biased. You really don't have any background in this subject do you? | |||
| ] (]) 16:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| If you had actually gone through that list, you would have noticed that most studies are from the 90's and there are several from the 2000's. Have you noticed that in the Misplaced Pages article the "invalidating" studies you quoted are also from the same time, if not earlier. You wouldn't call those "ancient", would you? Only the validating studies... | |||
| ] (]) 10:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Chiranjeevi == | |||
| Thank you, yes the award is less prominent ] (]) 15:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === SIIMA Awards === | |||
| SIIMA awards are a part of awards section, but you are removing them to intimidate editors by showing your dominance. SIIMA awards are included in awards section, you better check in other actors list ] (]) 16:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === Halo === | |||
| I have provided all sources for SIIMA award. Hope your eyesight is working properly. ] (]) 17:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === SIIMA Awards === | |||
| I have included Times of India reference for SIIMA, again I dont have to include the same in Awards section, but since you appear to abuse fellow editors, I will repeat the same source ] (]) 17:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === eye sight === | |||
| I am talking about Times of India reference, not wikipedia article as a reference, I did not include any wikipedia reference, sure you may have to check your eye sight ] (]) 17:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === SIIMA awards reference === | |||
| I have only included SIIMA award with Times of India reference as an Inline citation, this is the only edit I did in Chiranjeevi article. I cant understand your personal attack over me. ] (]) 17:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| === Please explain === | |||
| Please explain I really cannot understand which reference and claims you are talking about ] (]) 17:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Quit trying to intimidate people == | |||
| If someone is violating policy, then you should politely note it to them. If they do so repeatedly, the proper thing to do, once polite correction has failed, is not to threaten them, but to bring it up to a higher level. Repeatedly threatening to report people is a form of harassment or intimidation, and is not ]. Likewise, your clamping down on many things is an example of ]. Please clamp down on your aggression in the future. Misplaced Pages is about ]. ] (]) 21:38, 20 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :On the other hand, I like your use of Ping, I need to remember that, I like how it only requires 1 edit and doesn't clutter up talk pages or edit counts while still making that notifier come up. ] (]) 21:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for Response == | |||
| == Seasons' Greetings == | |||
| Hi RedPen | |||
| ] | |||
| Could you kindly respond to the points I have made regarding the inclusion of the Escapist DDoS on the ] talk page? In my edit comment I asked for a response to what I had written on the talk page in case of reversion. While you did give reasons for reversion in your edit comment, these did not address the points I had made on the talk page. According to ], reversions should be addressed on the talk page in case of dispute, so as someone who reverted the edit it would be highly useful to have a rebuttal from you. My apologies if I have come across as hostile or overzealous in any way. ] (]) 10:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ...to you and yours, from the Great White North! ] (]) 17:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| <Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Re Marilou mcphedran == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| I see we have some editing disagreements. In general the piece is puffed up but the most egregious claim is that this person has a masters from Osgoode hall law school when in fact it is a degree from osgoode's professional development program- OPD-a terminal and course based masters. There is no such thing as a thesis based Osgoode masters in comparative constitutional law though there is that designation from the OPD. You rejected my hyperlink but I encourage you to contact that law school to confirm. A false credential is a serious offence in academic circles so I thought it important to correct. Thanks for your comments and suggestions. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| == September 2014 == | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| <blockquote>'''Disambiguation page not required. ] is not known as "Motorist", and "motorist" is not ambiguous.'''</blockquote> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}''You may be in the right but don't go about it the wrong way.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 06:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == List of hoaxes == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| Could you please explain why you deleted my edit on ]? I merely linked to a Misplaced Pages article about a hoax. Thanks. --] (]) 12:31, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| :{{ping|ToniSant}} You did not provide any ] - Misplaced Pages articles ]. In addition there is nothing in the main article that gives anything other than a typical tabloid flash in the pan that merits an article. We are not here to facilitate someones desperate crawl for fame. ]/ ] / ] / ] etc. -- ] 12:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for the explanation. I see you're a deletionist. I'm an inclusionist. I won't get into an edit war with you, mainly because I see that you're quite forceful on such things. :-) I think that and are reliable sources by Misplaced Pages guidelines; however, media hoaxes are often just "tabloid flash in pan" things anyway. Please consider reverting your deletion. --] (]) 13:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::yes the trivialists and I frequently disagree on what is appropriate for an encyclopedia. -- ] 17:33, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| == Nayantara == | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->installation_location/cassandra/bin all settings displayed red color no work your ducomend | |||
| Hi bauer, I know you are little very strange but I tell you, DON'T you undo my edits with one click!!! Never ever ever again!!! You removed all upcoming films, the whole awards section and a whole subsection that ALL had very very reliable sources!!! Such mass edits without any discussion, seriously? By a senior editor?? Any sensibility?? Last time you did this!! ] (]) 19:27, 25 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Vvvvvvvvvmmm | |||
| Ttthjjjkkkkkjugbjfy1234★ | |||
| ↓©®$ | |||
| %%%7@&*mmmmghjkkjj | |||
| Open operations setting | |||
Latest revision as of 02:53, 11 November 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. TheRedPenOfDoom has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing the sole task for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. Vote NO on every candidate to prevent further validation of this farce.
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Insectoid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Insectoid, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Insectoid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Motorist (disambiguation)
The article Motorist (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required. The '?' Motorist is not known as "Motorist", and "motorist" is not ambiguous.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)installation_location/cassandra/bin all settings displayed red color no work your ducomend Vvvvvvvvvmmm Ttthjjjkkkkkjugbjfy1234★ ↓©®$ %%%7@&*mmmmghjkkjj Open operations setting
Categories: