| Revision as of 07:19, 26 September 2014 view sourceCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,962 edits →Proposed findings of fact on Banning Policy case: and again, please either back it up or remove it until you can← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015 view source Jehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Neotarf: User request within own user space ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| (184 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{banned user|time=indef|by=the ]|link=]}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 256K | |||
| |counter = 1 | |||
| {{noindex}} | |||
| |algo = old(24h) | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 1 | |||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 2 | |||
| |archive = User talk:Neotarf/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| How to disable Media Viewer: | |||
| * At the top of your page when you are logged in: Preferences > Appearance > Files. | |||
| Subpages: | |||
| *] Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the ''Signpost'' during the 2013 arbitration cycle | |||
| *]:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections | |||
| *]: Enables edit counter | |||
| *]:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013 | |||
| *]:Some notes | |||
| *] (including link to discussion about "retired" banner) | |||
| *] Wikimania civility speech, August 2014 | |||
| {{Retired}} | |||
| == Respect of my gender == | |||
| Hello, at one of the WP:ANI pages you commented and used male pronouns to describe me or subsequently used a comment like, 'Pretending to be something they're not'. I would like to note that '''I am a woman''' and referring to me by male pronouns by mistake, and fixing it later is perfectly fine, however given the context of the situation, I don't approve of it happening when I've made it clear several times that I am a woman. ArbCom especially has already set a precedent on this in the Manning case, where editors should respect other editor's gender identities, gender, backgrounds, and the like. I would like to be respected so I am going to ask that you edit your comment to use female pronouns. Thank you. ] (]) 15:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Diff? —] (]) 21:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :: . ] (]) 21:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::What male pronoun?—] (]) 21:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::: {{tq|Pretending to be something they're not'}} I also mentioned that bit. You're saying that I was pretending to be a woman. ] (]) 21:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Diff? —] (]) 21:52, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: The first diff I posted. Read where it starts "Claiming to be a woman..." ] (]) 22:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::You were claiming to be a woman, and you are still doing so. —] (]) 22:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::: Are you saying that I am not a woman, Neotarf? ] (]) 22:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Let's cut to the chase, shall we? There are no diffs. There are no male pronouns. Stop making stuff up, and go do something useful. —] (]) 22:20, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::: Not when your comment ultimately continues to say and implicate that I am a guy pretending to be a woman. Under ArbCom's manning dispute, other editors are to respect gender, gender identities, and other backgrounds. ArbCom also does good to enforce their rulings by sanctions. ] (]) 22:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::: Oh, please. And the ] said nothing about pronouns. Content disputes are not in ArbCom's remit. You may, however, be interested in ] —] (]) 22:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::: Please do read {{tq|Equality and respect | |||
| 5.2) Misplaced Pages editors and readers come from a diverse range of backgrounds, including with respect to their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex or '''gender,''' sexual orientation, and '''gender identity''' or expression. Comments that demean fellow editors, an article subject, or any other person, on the basis of any of these characteristics are offensive and damage the editing environment for everyone. Such comments, particularly when extreme or repeated after a warning, are grounds for blocking or other sanctions.}} | |||
| - https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning_naming_dispute ] (]) 22:40, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{OD}} | |||
| If you wish to continue making your ridiculous accusations, take it to the appropriate notice board, with diffs. ——] (]) 22:49, 13 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed findings of fact on Banning Policy case == | |||
| Hi Neotarf, notwithstanding the fact that the workshop case has closed would you please go through the findings of fact you've proposed and ensure that the claims and allegations made there are supported by recent diffs. They will make it much easier for the Committee to decide what action to take than unsupported claims. Thank you, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 04:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure, but as I indicated on the workshop page, it will take some time. —] (]) 05:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::How about the three diffs which support ? After I just asked you to supply evidence you make an edit which adds more ] to your evidence. If you can't back it up with evidence (including diffs) please remove the allegations until you can. Thank you, <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 07:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 19 January 2015