Misplaced Pages

:Copyright problems/2014 September 28: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:44, 28 September 2014 editMER-C (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators250,704 edits create  Latest revision as of 14:27, 5 October 2014 edit undoVoceditenore (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers123,168 edits 28 September 2014: ce 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<!-- This is Cppage. Comment used by User:DumbBOT, do not remove or change --> <!-- This is Cppage. Comment used by User:DumbBOT, do not remove or change -->
===== Copyright investigations (manual article tagging) ===== ===== Copyright investigations (manual article tagging) =====
* {{anchor|:Anil Trivedi}}] <span class="plainlinks">( · · ])</span> from http://candidates.aamaadmiparty.org/anil-trivedi.html. ] (]) 10:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

:*] '''Article cleaned''' by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Note that the editor reporting the copyvio and the author of the comment below have both been blocked for sockpuppetry and legal threats. Although there was definitely copyright infringement from the URL specified, there is no credible evidence that they were acting on behalf of the copyright holder. --] (]) 14:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)<br>
:::To the Network Administrator. Take notice that I am acting for the affected person/s. This content must be disabled immediately. ] (]) 09:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:27, 5 October 2014

28 September 2014

Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)

SCV for 2014-09-28 Edit

2014-09-28 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Cleaned (for now). Article was rife with promotional edit warring and copyright vio image warring, such that it was protected. Worth keeping an eye on. Crow 23:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Note that the editor reporting the copyvio and the author of the comment below have both been blocked for sockpuppetry and legal threats. Although there was definitely copyright infringement from the URL specified, there is no credible evidence that they were acting on behalf of the copyright holder. --Voceditenore (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
To the Network Administrator. Take notice that I am acting for the affected person/s. This content must be disabled immediately. Claus at Name Defend DE (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)