| Revision as of 20:08, 9 October 2014 editVeera Dheera Sooran (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,079 edits General note: Removal of content, blanking on Bobby Simha. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:53, 11 November 2024 edit undo5.31.240.101 (talk) →Nomination of Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai for deletion: SettingTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around | |||
| |2 = {{BASEPAGENAME}} | |||
| |3 = {{MONTHNAME|12}} 2015 }} | |||
| <!--PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP, OF THE PAGE!!!--> | <!--PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM, NOT THE TOP, OF THE PAGE!!!--> | ||
| <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;color:red;"> <big><big><big><big><big><big>'''VOTE NO'''</big></big></big></big></big></big></div> | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive index|mask=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| |counter = 16 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| |algo = old(10d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=10|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot III}} | |||
| {{archives|small=yes|index=/Archive index}} | |||
| And there is also ]. | |||
| The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing '''the sole task''' for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. '''Vote NO on every candidate''' to prevent further validation of this farce. | |||
| == Barnstar == | |||
| Thx 4 d barnstar :D. WIll do my best to make articles nicer to see and read. ] (]) | |||
| == September 2014 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| ] HURRY, HURRY, HURRY! | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}''You may be in the right but don't go about it the wrong way.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 06:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes! | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>'''''Shahrukh Bola "Khoobsurat Hai Tu"''''' (</nowiki>{{red|'''{{'''}}<nowiki>English:'' Shahrukh said "You are Beautiful"'') is a 2010 ] film directed by [[Makrand</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, 2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 22:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits. | |||
| Dude now check the main lead. Every thing mentioned is sourced and all sources are reliable. please check before reverting. myself cleaned unwanted content.now the article looks perfect. Thanks ] ] (]) 14:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC). | |||
| == Complaint of edit warring at ] == | |||
| The most ethical show in the big top! | |||
| Do you want to reply to ]? It is a claim of edit warring at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br> | |||
| My experience is that User:TheRedPenOfDoom is engaging in repeated editing wars across a variety of articles and must be stopped asap. See his actions on ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == A proposed compromise for the ] article == | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive index|mask=User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0|indexhere=yes}} | |||
| Hi Red-Pen, | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| If I were to accept your two "negatively phrased" points in the last sentence of the lead for the ] article, could you allow me to add one more "positively phrased" point there, such that it would read something like: | |||
| |archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| "The book has been called everything from "New Age psychobabble" and "a Satanic seduction" to the "Third Testament", and "The New Age Bible". " | |||
| |counter = 20 | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| Would this be acceptable to you? Hoping we might be able to settle this thing directly between us. ] (]) 14:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| |algo = old(10d) | |||
| :{{ping|Scottperry}} it would probably be better to beef up the reception section and once that is more fully reflective of the views that are out there, adjust the lead to match. -- ] | |||
| |archive = User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| ::The book is clearly a somewhat "controversial" book, with very strong opinions on both sides. "Christians" and athiests on the one side considering it as pure rubbish at best, or satanic at worst, while the millions who study it, obviously consider it to be of considerable value. You would appear to me to fall into the "anti-camp" while I admittedly fall into the "pro-camp". With controversial topics, it is my understanding that Misplaced Pages generally attempts to suitably represent both sides of any such "conversation", no? ] (]) 15:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| {{archives|small=yes|index=/Archive index|age=10|bot=MiszaBot III}} | |||
| :::nope ] which per Miller is "Christians think it is non-Christian at best and Satanic at worst, Academia considers it pure psychobabble, its promoters see it as a financial cash cow, and its adherents love it." -- ] 15:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| And there is also ] | |||
| ::::So you are then saying that the reports of its adherents cannot be represented in Misplaced Pages, per Misplaced Pages policy?] (]) 15:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::reports of its adherents are only appropriate when filtered through a third party expert who evaluates their representation and value. -- ] 15:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::So then, all articles on Christianity cannot allow for any "Christian" authors to be directly represented? Is that what you are saying? Same would go for athiests, birthers, etc. etc. I have not heard that rule before. ] (]) 15:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::sure we do. we dont include "John Doe Christian believes/do/are considered X" we have "Theologian John Doe says Christians believe/do/are considered X" and when it is clear that Theologian John Doe's views represent a majority of the experts on the subject, we simply say "Christians believe/do/are considered X" but its based on the third party expert.-- ] 15:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| It seems to me that the readers of an article about a book that has sold into the millions deserve to hear directly from experts such as Dyer, Winfrey, and Tolle about what makes the book "tick", as well as hearing from expert Theologians and folks akin to yourself as to why it is nothing more than "Satanic psychobabble". ] (]) 15:58, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :1) please stop making assertions about who i am and what i believe. ] | |||
| :2) we are an encyclopedia and we present the subject as an encyclopedia would. if people come here expecting something else, they will still find an encyclopedia. if they are disappointed because they wanted something other than an encyclopedia when they came to Misplaced Pages the 💕, oh well, hopefully they know how to google. -- ] 16:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::You have insisted on including the terms "psychbabble" and "Satanic" in the article's lead. That is a mere point of fact, and not meant to be an attack. Misplaced Pages, by its nature, is far more than Britannica ever was. Britannica only treated nearly all subjects very "sparsley", if for no other reason, simply due to lack of space. One definition of an encyclopedia is "a well-rounded view". Not only an "academic-mainstream view". It seems to me that Misplaced Pages has enough room to represent more views than Britannica ever did. So are you going to attempt to delete the views of the experts I listed then? ] (]) 16:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::"psychbabble" and "Satanic" are sourced by third party Miller as significant views of the book by major populations. thats what we present. | |||
| ::: wikipedia is ] or have ]. | |||
| :::If your involvement in with the subject creates aw ] you should seek out other subjects where you do not have the conflict. Misplaced Pages is big and there are lots of articles that need help where you can edit all day long without worrying touching subjects that you cannot approach with the required perspective.-- ] 16:26, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::So you would prefer to only represent the "critical" view in the article and no other. That is apparently your take on what a "well rounded view" should be, one that is entirely critical in this case, no? You would censor out the experts who are not critical, is that correct? And you would attempt to drive away anyone who did not agree with you, no? On the one hand you say you want "experts" to be represented, but then you are apparently saying that only critical experts may be represented, no? ] (]) 22:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::if the ]. -- ] 22:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You mean "that is what we ''only'' present", not "what we present ''as well''", no? ] (]) 22:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I think so. | |||
| :::::*Mainstream reliable sources present the topic as : AAA BB C D | |||
| :::::*Our article presents the topic as: AAA BB C D | |||
| :::::Given the paucity of third party coverage given and used in the article, we have to make some estimates, but roughly seems to me that the coverage is 1) popular with the New Age masses, 2) rejected by Christians as anti-biblical at best and satanic at worst 3) dismissed by academics as psychobabble, 4) New age speaker home industry cash cow (see 1) 5) long-running litigious copyright fight (see 4) 6) splintering into "just unique enough" derivatives or MyTakeOnACIM to keep 4 in business. | |||
| :::::What am I missing?-- ] 22:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| So, in your view, Misplaced Pages is supposed to be the "arbiter of the ''correct'', supposedly mainstream academic view". A place where only the majority voice is heard, and all others censored. If for example, it were one century ago, when the mainstream view was that outer space is filled with a material called "ether", and anyone published a theory that outer space was pure vacuum, then a Misplaced Pages of that day would have refused to let the "vacuum scientist" be heard directly, no? ] (]) 22:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :Its not my view, it is policy: ]. So yes we present the current mainstream academic views and as they change, if they do, the article content changes to reflect them. ] or ] fighting for ]<sup>TM</sup>-- ] 22:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::So you believe that it would have been "correct" Misplaced Pages policy to "censor out the vacuum scientist." What about ] which states that, "Misplaced Pages articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority ''and significant minority views'' that have appeared in those sources are covered.", and on the same page that you referred to: ]? Would the views of the adherents of a New Religious Movement such as ACIM, not represent a ''significant minority view'' in an article about that movement's primary study book? ] (]) 23:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::yes, until the vacuum scientist had published his papers and convinced a significant portion of the mainstream scientists that he was on the right track and not a looney, he would not be covered as anything other than a curiosity. We dont make any effort to predict what is going to turn out to be true and what is going to turn out pure crap, we just follow what the mainstream has agreed has actually been convincingly demonstrated. -- ] 23:33, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::One thing I can say with fair certainty, Britannica's tone was always "respectful" (read NPOV) towards all subject matters. You will never find a Britannica article with loaded words like "Psychobabble" in the leads of any of their articles. ] (]) 23:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::britanica had better things to do than cover anything that it might have called "psychobabble" in the lead.-- ] 23:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::So you are saying that even in a Misplaced Pages article specifically about a given New Religious Movement (NRM), the Misplaced Pages readership ought to be "protected" (by editors such as yourself) from actually getting to read the uncensored views of that NRM's adherents, even if such adherents have published reliable sources on these views? 23:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::If people want to find out what a new religious movement has to say about themselves, they should google the new religious movement's home page. If they come to Misplaced Pages, the 💕, they should find encyclopedic coverage dont you think? -- ] 23:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::For the last 10 years (since the article was first created), this article has stood with both the critical and the adherent's views being presented, side by side, as many other such articles in Misplaced Pages are still written to this day. Apparently you are of the opinion that this was 10 years of "error". Since you arrived at the article last summer, you have apparently intended to rewrite the article so that it explained primarily your view (which you believe is the "mainstream-academic" view), that ACIM is essentially nothing but "psychobabble", and would be slanted heavily against, if even permitting, any other views. If these are the new policies in Misplaced Pages, then I stand humbly corrected. If not, then it is my aim to seek out a consultation from a mutually respected neutral third party on this question. Thanks, ] (]) 02:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::What third party sources haven't been included? -- ] 02:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Obviously you are quite sincere in your belief that such is Misplaced Pages policy. I too feel sincere in my understanding of Misplaced Pages policy. It would seem to me that one (or perhaps both) of us may need a little "tweaking" of our understanding of Misplaced Pages policy. As such, it is my aim to ask for a comment on these questions from a mutually respected third-party person from Misplaced Pages. (Good night from America) Thanks, ] (]) 03:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::Yes, I am quite sincere that there are policies that '''we present what the reliable third parties say:''' ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ]. I am not sure where you got the idea that there are policies that say otherwise.-- ] 03:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Notification: RfC on Game of Thrones and chapter-to-episode statements == | |||
| The RfC: Is Westeros.org a suitable source for this content? was closed with the result that Westeros.org is reliable but that whether the disputed text was valuable enough to include should be addressed separately. The closing editor recommended that all participants in the RfC and related RSN discussion be informed that such a discussion was under way: | |||
| ] | |||
| If any of you wish to make a statement on this matter, you are welcome to do so and your contribution would be greatly appreciated. If any of you would prefer to stay away from this dispute, I think we can all get that too. ] (]) 16:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == relating conspiracies == | |||
| how many of relating conspiracies have credible sources for aliens: | |||
| Alleged UFO-related entities | |||
| Energy beings | |||
| Grey aliens | |||
| Insectoids | |||
| Little green men | |||
| Nordic aliens | |||
| Reptilians | |||
| Projects has a list: | |||
| Project Sign (1948) | |||
| Estimate of the Situation | |||
| Project Grudge (1949) | |||
| Flying Saucer Working Party (1950) | |||
| Project Magnet (1950–1962) | |||
| Project Blue Book (1952–1970) | |||
| Robertson Panel (1953) | |||
| Condon Report (1966–1968) | |||
| Institute 22 (1978–?) | |||
| Project Condign (1997–2000) | |||
| Identification studies of UFOs | |||
| List of notable studies in ufology | |||
| Thus the documents themselves should be included somewhere if these are as well. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::''"how many of relating conspiracies have credible sources for aliens:"'' uh none. ever. anywhere. | |||
| ::''"Thus the documents themselves should be included somewhere"'' you must ]. -- ] 04:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ''"uh none. ever. anywhere."'' Tripod? They sell them in the Los Angeles Times in the Pasadena are near Jet Propulsion Labratories. Highlights of the advertisement include the cyrogenics for freezing. So you are not credible or the Los Angeles Times isnt. I personally choose them over you. | |||
| Heres webhosting that you say ive mistaben wikipedia for (anyone can create an incident : https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings | |||
| == Seasons' Greetings == | |||
| Maybe the CIA pays you to remove such documentation that maybe seen as "neutral" and for your to maintain an opinionated page. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::boy, do I need to buy stock in tinfoil! -- ] 04:35, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ''"boy, do I need to buy stock in tinfoil!"'' | |||
| Cell phones don't need tinfoil. Get a new IP address. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:39, 29 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| So you admit you're a spirit using a cellphone Haha Don't spend all your time editing wikipedia pages. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 04:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Reverred changes in ]== | |||
| ...to you and yours, from the Great White North! ] (]) 17:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| <Br><Br><Br><Br><Br><Br> | |||
| I am ] who recently expanded the page ] by editing various contents and expanded the page through various sources. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| I am unable to get as to why have you revered the entire edit as it contained all the sourced information in the edited in the page. So I would kindly request you to explain me the reason as to why have you revered the entire edit which contained the sourced facts in the page. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| == M. Frost == | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| Why did you remove ? ] is a reliable source, is it not? Regards. --] (]) 19:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == meat puppet accusation == | |||
| <blockquote>'''Disambiguation page not required. ] is not known as "Motorist", and "motorist" is not ambiguous.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You accused me of being a meat puppet . Please strike it. That is way over the top. ] (]) 13:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :If you start putting forth positions that show independent basis for thought and not just that we should succumb and acquiesce to the paid PR's desires, then I will. -- ] 17:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::I will ask you one more time. Then I will take you to ANI. This is offensive. I am nobody's fucking tool. ] (]) 17:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::So here is the one more time - please strike your comment. It is '''very''' offensive to me and you have no evidence that i am a meatpuppet. If your accusation is in good faith then take me to ]. Otherwise, withdraw it. ] (]) 17:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::::if you dont want to be accused of carrying on the same crusade as chopra's paid PR flacky then you shouldnt specifically identify your goal as promoting the same crusade as chopras PR flacky. -- ] 02:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Your behavior is ugly but I decided not to bother the community with this. 11:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == PEAR Lab == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Hi: When you get a chance, could you help follow up on the notes at ]? I absolutely agree that this stuff ''ain't science'', but is rather more of an academic/cultural curiosity. I'd like to get the background/funding into the same tone/style as many of the other parapsychology entries, like ] for example. Per yr comment, it doesn't have to be in the lede of course. We should also try to deal with the ] and ] item, in the absence of evidence of actual malicious intent. Tnx! ] (]) 16:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == addition to Osgoode Hall Law School == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I re-added Jean-Gabriel Castel with more links to provide evidence for the claims. All the claims are available in the links. ] (]) 17:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Alcoxnow | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->installation_location/cassandra/bin all settings displayed red color no work your ducomend | |||
| == October 2014 == | |||
| Vvvvvvvvvmmm | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 20:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Ttthjjjkkkkkjugbjfy1234★ | |||
| ↓©®$ | |||
| %%%7@&*mmmmghjkkjj | |||
| Open operations setting | |||
Latest revision as of 02:53, 11 November 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. TheRedPenOfDoom has not edited Misplaced Pages since December 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
The ArbCom as currently constructed and staffed has amply demonstrated that not only is it incapable of accomplishing the sole task for which it was established (To provide resolution to disputes that the community has been unable to resolve), it has become the locus from which disruption emanates. Vote NO on every candidate to prevent further validation of this farce.
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Insectoid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Insectoid, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Insectoid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Motorist (disambiguation)
The article Motorist (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required. The '?' Motorist is not known as "Motorist", and "motorist" is not ambiguous.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tu Mere Agal Bagal Hai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)installation_location/cassandra/bin all settings displayed red color no work your ducomend Vvvvvvvvvmmm Ttthjjjkkkkkjugbjfy1234★ ↓©®$ %%%7@&*mmmmghjkkjj Open operations setting
Categories: