| Revision as of 12:07, 24 October 2014 editRanze (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,222 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:13, 6 October 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | |||
| ] Hello and ]. When you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to ]. There are two ways to do this. Either: | |||
| # Add four ]s ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or | |||
| # With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (] or ]) located above the edit window. | |||
| This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when. | |||
| Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 09:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] applies '''everywhere'''. If you're going to make statements like you need to provide reliable sources that report those statements. --] <sup>]</sup> 13:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC) | |||
| To be clear: | |||
| :"the SJWs claiming that it was pure misogyny because it disclosed that she cheated on him" - is fine; | |||
| :"there's no marriage involved here" - is fine; | |||
| but I have to cite that they were in a monogamous relationship? | |||
| Or is the claim that we're allowed to say that Zoe's ex made certain allegations (since an RS mentioned them), but can't actually say what those allegations were? Everything in my comment was clear about the allegations being allegations and not presenting anything as factual that can't be demonstrated. {{unsigned}} | |||
| :If a couple in an exclusive relationship are not married I would propose -monoamorous- in place of monogamous. Instead of trying to prove an exclusive relationship exists (kinda hard) an alternative would be to state that there is no evidence of additional relationships, which implies monoamorousness and leaves the burden of disproving that (evidence of other relations) to detractors. ] (]) 12:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2014 == | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you violate Misplaced Pages's ] policy by inserting ] or ] ] content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-biog4im --> ] (]) 08:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| I did no such thing. ] (]) 08:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :It would be useful if NBSB had been more specific about which edit to the talk page they are alleging violates BLP. Save other curious parties some legwork. ] (]) 12:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Q4U== | |||
| In you mentioned that an edit of yours was revdelled as -trolling-. You did not provide a link to the edit you made (or the one made removing your text) so I am not sure what comment it is. Could you link to it from your contributions? In the future this would be useful for informing users regarding your accusations. ] (]) 12:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:13, 6 October 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.